throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`22-044
`
`RISK ASSESSMENT and RISK MITIGATION
`
`REVIEWg S!
`
`

`

`”ah
`MEMORANDUM
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`
`.
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`DATE:
`
`February 20, 2007
`
`TO:
`
`Mary Parks, M.D., Director
`Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products
`
`THROUGH: Ellis Unger, M.D., Acting Deputy Director
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology
`
`FROM:
`
`Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) Risk Management Team
`
`DRUG:
`
`Janumet (sitagliptin phosphate / metformin hydrochloride) Tablets
`
`NDA#:
`
`22-044
`
`SPONSOR: Merck & Co.
`
`SUBJECT: Review of Proposed Risk Management Plan (RMP) submitted
`May 22, 2006
`
`RCM #:
`
`2006-668
`
`INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
`
`This consult follows a request by the Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products
`(DMEP), for the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) to review and comment
`on the Sponsor’s proposed Risk Management Plan (RMP) for Janumet (sitagliptin
`phosphate / metformin hydrochloride fixed-dose combination) Tablets.
`
`Janumet is a fixed-dose combination of Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4)
`inhibitor approved October 16, 2006 as a single-ingredient product (Januvia) and
`meforrnin, a biguanide approved March 3, 1995 as a single~ingredient product
`(Glucophage). Sitagliptin exerts glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes by
`preventingthe rapid degradation of incretin hormones. Incretin hormones, including
`glucagon-like peptide-l (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), are
`released by the intestine throughout the day, and levels are increased in response to a
`meal. Metformin acts by decreasing hepatic glucose output and improving insulin
`sensitivity in liver and muscle. The proposed indication for Janumet is as an adjunct to
`
`

`

`diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
`who fail to achieve adequate control with diet and exercise and either ingredient alone, or
`in patients who are already being treated with both single-ingredient products. The
`proposed dosage is sitagliptin 50mg and metformin 500mg orally twice daily or
`sitagliptin 50mg and metformin 1000mg orally twice daily.
`
`The safety information for Janumet consists of data from four studies in which patients
`were co-administered sitagliptin and metformin. In the four studies combified, 1569
`subjects received metformin at daily dOSes Z 1500mg and sitagliptin at daily doses of
`100mg. In these studies, the subjects received combination therapy with sitagliptin and
`metformin for a mean period of 36.4 weeks. The Sponsor did not identify any safety
`signals or potential risks in any of the studies that would warrant risk management
`measures beyond routine labeling and pharmacovigilance. They noted that there is one
`important potential risk, necrotic skin lesions in the monkey, which has been identified
`with another DPP4 inhibitor. To date, this event has not been seen with sitagliptin.
`Additionally, there are no safety data in the following patient populations: children,
`pregnant women, patients with congestive heart failure, and patients with renal function
`impairment (metformin is contraindicated for patientswith congestive heart failure or
`renal function impairment).
`
`The Ilan Irony, M.D., the medical officer assigned to the clinical review of this NDA,
`indicated in a draft review1 that there are no new concerns regarding the safety of the co-
`administration of sitagliptin and metformin than those already noted in the review of the
`sitagliptin NDA and the known safety profile of metformin. Neither of these products has
`a Risk Minimization Action Plan (RiskMAP). Dr. Irony agrees with the routine risk
`management activity proposed by the Sponsor.
`
`REVIEW OF SPONSOR’S RMP
`
`The Sponsor does not believe that a RiskMAP is warranted for this product. They are
`proposing the following pharmacovigilance/ surveillance and post—marketing safety
`activities:
`-
`
`0 Labeling — professional labeling and the patient package insert will be utilized to
`convey to prescribers, other healthcare professionals, and patients about the risks
`associated with Janumet.
`
`o Routine Pharmacovigilance Practices — reporting of adverse event information will be
`accomplished in accordance with the relevant legal requirements.
`' o Necrotic skin lesions in monkeys — based on the Agency’s concern regarding animal
`data indicating that the administration of DPP-IV inhibitors to monkeys results in
`dose-dependent and duration-dependent increases in necrotic skin lesions, the
`Sponsor is undertaking an oral toxicity study in monkeys over a range of doses forlup
`to 3 months duration, the design of which has been reviewed and agreed upon by the
`US. FDA.
`
`1 [Ian Irony, MD, Medical Officer. Clinical Review of Janumet (sitagliptin phosphate and metformin
`hydrochloride fixed-dose combination), NDA 22—044; drafi clinical review forwarded 2/7/07.
`
`

`

`0
`
`Pregnancy Registry — In order to develop a better assessment ofthe safety profile of
`sitagliptin in pregnant women and for exposed fetuses, the Sponsor is establishing 21
`~ pregnancy registry for follow-up of sitagliptin pregnancy exposures. The pregnancy
`registry will be an enhanced surveillance program ofwomen exposed to sitagliptin,
`including women exposed to sitagliptin and metformin tablets, at any time from the
`date of the last menstrual period through the duration of the pregnancy.
`-.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The Sponsor’s proposed RMP does not differ substantially from routine risk management
`measures, such as FDA-approved professional labeling and routine post-marketing
`surveillance. The Sponsor has proposed other risk assessment measures for sitagliptin,
`including a plan to undertake an oral toxicity study in monkeys to assess the risk of
`necrotic skin lesions over,a range of doses and a pregnancy registry to determine if there
`is any risk to the pregnant woman or developing fetuses.
`
`OSE concludes that the Sponsor’s proposal for routine risk management measures and '
`planned pharmacovigilance activities is sufficient at this time. Ifthe Sponsor or the
`reviewing division identifies a safety concern in the fixture that might warrant a
`RiskMAP, or if the reviewing division wants OSE to review any proposed Phase IV
`protocols or epidemiological post-marketing studies, please provide a consult request.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`OSE Risk Management Team
`Mary Dempsey, Risk Management Program Coordinator
`Claudia Karwoski, PharmD, Team Leader, Risk Management Team
`Joyce Weaver, PharmD, Senior Risk Management Analyst
`Mary ~Willy, PhD, Senior Risk Management Epidemiologist
`
`

`

`This is a representation of'an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Mary Dempsey
`2/20/2007 04:30:50 PM
`DRUG SAFETY OFFICE REVIEWER
`
`Ellis Unger
`-2/20/2007 04:42:10 PM
`MEDICAL OFFICER
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket