throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`22-044
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND
`
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`Oflz‘ce of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics
`
`
`
`OCP Division (l, H, “LIV, V)
`
`DCP ll
`
`Medical Division
`OCPB Reviewer
`
`eam Leader053a --J
`
`Xiaoxion_ Jim Wei
`Hae-Youn Ahn
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New Dru A : :lication Filin and Review Form
`General information About the Submission
`NDA Number
`Brand Name
`Janumet TM
`Generic Name
`
`Sitagliptin
`phosphate/Metformin
`hydrochloride fixed-dose
`combination
`Anti-diabetic
`
`T $2 Diabetes
`tablets
`
`100 m [1500-2000 ; da
`
`Dru_ Class
`Indication s
`
`Dosa_e Form
`Dosin_ Re_imen
`Route of Administration
`
`Priori Classification
`
`
`
`
`05-31-2006
`Date of Submission
`Estimated Due Date of OCPB Review March 2, 2007
`Division Due Date
`March 2, 2007
`PDUFA Due Date
`
`March 30, 200;]
`Clin. I’harm. and Bio harm. Information
`
`“X" if included
`Number of
`Number of
`Critical Comments If any
`studies
`at filing
`reviewed
`
`STUDY TYPE
`
`Table of Contents present and sufficient to
`locate re orts, tables, data, etc.
`Tabular Listin_ otAll Human Studies
`
`Labelin_
`
`Reference Bioanalytical and Analytical
`Methods
`
`L Clinical Pharmacolo_
`Mass balance:
`lsoz me characterization:
`Blood/ ulasma ratio:
`
`Plasma orotein bindin_:
`Pharmacokinetics e.., Phase
`Health Volunteers-
`
`-
`
`Patients-
`
`sin _le dose:
`multi . 1e dose:
`
`sin _1e dose:
`multi ule dose:
`
`Dose ro nortionali
`
`-
`
`fastin. Inon-fastin; sin_le dose:
`fastin ; / non-fastin ; multi . le dose:
`Dru_-dru_ interaction studies -
`dru_:
`In«vivo effects on rima
`dru_:
`ln-vivo effects of urima
`ln-vitro:
`
`Sub I ulation studies -
`
`
`
`ethnici
`
`:
`
`ender:
`ediatrics:
`
`eriatrics:
`' renal imain'nent:
`
`KNDA22—044NDA22-044-Janumet-Sitagliptain-Metformin—filing.doc
`
`A}:
`
`
`
`

`

`
` _-
`
`
`Po ulation Anal ses -
`‘ —
`_—
`
`
`_—
`”_—
`
`_—-—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___-
`
`
`__—
`___—
`
`re- licate desi - n; sin lel multi dose:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___—
`___—
`Bcsaass
`' ___
`___—
`“__-
`__—
`___
`___
`___
`_ —
` Filabilit 'and QBR- comments
`__
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Primary reviewer Signature and Date
`
`
`Secondary reviewer Signature and Date
`
`This Way
`
`
`
`KNDA22—044NDA22—044-Janumei-Sitagiiptain-Metformin-filing.doc
`
`

`

`Briefing In Content:
`
`Merck submitted this NDA for seeking approval of fixed dose combination drug products of Sitagliptin and
`. Metformin. Sitagliptin phosphate (MK-0431) is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4)
`inhibitor developed by Merck & Co., Inc. for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is
`currently with the Agency for review under NDA21-995. Metformin hydrochloride is an approved anti-
`hyperglycemic agent widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. TIE: sponsor has
`developed an immediate release product containing a fixed dose of sitagliptin phosphate and multiple
`dose levels of metformin hydrochloride for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who are not
`adequately controlled with either agent alone or patients already being treated with the combination of
`sitagliptin and metformin. Two dose strengths of a film-coated fixed-dose Combination (FDC) tablet
`have been developed for the US. market: sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg/mg and 50/ 1000 mg/mg.
`
`To support this combo drug product, the sponsor submitted three new PK studies, two of which are BE studies,
`and one of which is PD study. All three studies were conducted in healthy subjects:
`
`1) Study P38 (BE with test formulations)
`
`A 2-Part, Open-Label, Randomized, 3—Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Profiles of MK-
`0431 and Metformin After Oral Administration of Single Doses of MK-043 l/Metforrnin Fixed~Dose
`Combination Tablet Probe Formulations or Coadministration of MK-0431 With Metforrnin as Individual
`
`' Tablets to Healthy Adult Subjects
`
`2) Study P48 (BE with commercial formulations)
`
`An Open-Label, Randomized, Two—Part, Two-Period Crossover Study to Demonstrate the Definitive
`Bioequivalence After Administration of the Final Market Image (FMI) of the MK-043l/Metformin 50/500 mg
`and 50/1000 mg Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Tablet and Concomitant Administration of 50-mg Doses of
`MK-043l and 500- or 1000-mg Doses of Metforrnin as Individual Tablets to Healthy Adult Subjects
`
`3) Study P50 (PD study)
`
`This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, doublevdummy, four-period crossover study to assess
`the effects of concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metforrnin alone and in combination on post-meal
`incretin hormone concentrations in healthy adult subjects. The objectives are to determine the effect of
`concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metforrnin on post-meal plasma incretin hormone concentrations ‘(e.g.,
`active and inactive and/or total glucagon-like peptide-l [GLP-1] and gastric inhibitory peptide [GIP] concentrations,
`the ratio of active to total GLP-1 and GIP concentrations) in healthy adult subjects. This study is to assess the effects
`of sitagliptin and metforrnin on post-meal incretin hormone (active and total GLP-1 and GIP) concentrations after
`concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metformin and after administration of sitagliptin alone, metforrnin alone
`and placebo in healthy adult subjects. In each 2-day treatment period, subjects were randomized to receive either
`sitagliptin alone (active sitagliptin and placebo to metformin), metforrnin alone (placebo to sitagliptin and active
`metformin), concomitant administration of sitagliptin, and metformin or placebo (concomitant administration of
`placebo to sitagliptin and placebo to metformin) according to a computer-generated allocation schedule (see treatment
`schedule below). Each subject received all treatments and there was a minimum of a 7-day washout interval between
`the last dose of study drug in one treatment period and the first dose of study drug in subsequent treatment periods.
`
`KNDA22v044NDA22-044-Janumet-Sitagliptain-Metforminvfiling.doc
`
`3
`
`

`

`The Sponsor cited many supportive studies in NDA21-995 including drug interactiOn studies between
`sitagliptin and metformin.
`
`The sponsor has developed dissolution specification for this combo drug product: no less than ..—— dissolved in
`20 min.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`KNDA22—044NDA22-044—Janumet-Sitagiiptain-Metformin-filing.doc
`
`4
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Xiao—xiong Wei
`7/17/2006 01:47:50 PM
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`Hae—Young Ahn
`7/17/2006 02:20:33 PM
`BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`

`

`.
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW
`_%
`
`NDA: 22-044
`
`Brand Name
`
`Generic Name
`
`Submission Date(s): 5/31/06
`
`Janumet
`
`Sitagliptin Phosphate and Metformifi‘ Hydrochloride
`Fixed Dose Tablets
`
`Reviewer
`
`Jaya bharathi Vaidyanathan, Ph.D.
`
`Team Leader (Acting)
`
`Jim Wei, Ph.D.
`
`OCP Division
`
`DCP-2
`
`0ND Division
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Products
`
`Sponsor
`
`Submission Type
`
`Formulation; Strength(s)
`
`Merck
`
`505 (b) (2)
`
`1000 mg
`50 mg/
`500 mg;
`50 mg/
`Sitagliptin/metformin Oral tablets administered
`
`_
`
`BID
`
`Indication
`Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
`
`
`Table of Contents
`
`I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 2
`A.
`Recommendation ................................................................................................. 2
`B.
`Phase IV Commitments....................................................................................... 2
`C.
`Summary of Clinical Pharmacology & Biopharmaceutics Findings.............. 3
`II. QBR .......................................-...........................................................................‘........... 3
`A.
`General Attributes........................................-....................................................... 3
`B.
`General Clinical Pharmacology ......................................................................... 6
`C.
`Intrinsic Factors ................................................................................................... 9
`D.
`Extrinsic Factors .................................................................................................. 9
`E.
`General Biopharmaceutics................................................................................ 10
`F.
`Analytical ............................................................................................................ 14
`III. Labeling Comments .........................’........................................................................ 15
`IV. Appendix ......................................................’............................................................. 16
`A.
`Proposed Labeling ............................................................................................. 15
`B.
`Individual Study synopsis ................................................................................. 36
`C. OCP Filing Memo ............................................................................................... 50
`
`

`

`I
`
`Executive Summary
`
`Merck has developed fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets containing sitagliptin and
`metforrnin.
`
`The efficacy and safety of the concomitant use of sitagliptin and metforrnin has
`previously been evaluated in controlled clinical
`trials (NDA 21—995). Concomitant
`administration of the separate commercial sitagliptin and metforrnin tablets in adult
`patients with type 2 diabetes was approved by the FDA in October 16, 2006 as a part of'
`the original marketing approval of sitagliptin.
`
`Sitagliptin is approved for once-daily administration at doses of 100 mg. Metforrnin is
`available in 500, 850, and 1000 mg tablets and is approved for individualized treatment
`up to a maximum daily dose of 2550 mg in adults. Typically metformin is administered
`twice per day with meals.
`
`To aid in the approval of this application the sponsor has submitted one pivotal
`bioequivalence study (048) and one pharmacodynamic study (058). There were no
`clinical studies done with the to-be marketed combination product and the bioequivalence
`study was designed to bridge the proposed combination tablets to the clinical safety and
`efficacy database supporting the use of sitagliptin in combination with metformin-
`existing under the approved NDA.
`
`A
`
`Recommendation
`
`The Office of Clinical Pharmacology/Division of Clinical Pharamcology—Z (OCP/DCP-Z)
`has reviewed the information provided in the NDA 22-044'for Janumet tablets and finds
`it acceptable. Recommendations and labeling comments should be sent to the sponsor as
`appropriate.
`
`at
`
`Clinical Pharmacology briefing was held on 2/21/07 and the attendees were Drs. Chandra
`Sahajwalla, Suresh Doddapaneni, Ilan Irony, Jim Wei, Jayabharathi Vaidyanathan, Sally
`Choe, Leena Aljuburi and Qi Liu.
`
`B
`
`Phase 4 Commitments
`
`None.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`

`

`C
`
`Summafl of Clinical Pharmacology Findings
`
`The summary of the results from the PK and PD studies are provided below.
`
`Bioequivalence: The results of the study demonstrated that the final market image (FMI)
`sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 and 50/1000 mg FDC tablets are bioequivalent
`to
`concomitant administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as
`individual
`tablets. The 90% confidence interval
`for
`the geometric mean ratios
`(FDC/concomitant administration) for the AUCinf and Cmax for both sitagliptin and
`metformin fell within the'bioequivalence limits of 80—125% for both strengths studied.
`Demonstration of bioequivalence thus bridges the safety and efficacy data from the
`clinical studies using co-administration of sitagliptin and metformin to the FDC tablets.
`
`Pharm'acodynamics: The 4 hour post-meal mean active glucagon like peptide-l (GLP-l)
`concentrations were increased significantly afier concomitant administration of sitagliptin
`and metformin compared with administration of sitagliptin alone. The ratio of active to
`total GLP—l concentrations increased after administration of sitagliptin alone. On the
`other hand, glucose dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) concentrations were similar
`following concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metforminversus sitagliptin
`alone.
`
`The known mechanism of action of metformin is as follows: Decreases hepatic glucose
`production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose and improves insulin sensitivity by
`increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. The results of the PD study indicates
`that metformin alone caused an increase in circulating levels of both active and total
`GLP-I to a similar extent (about 80%). Therefore, metformin may potentially increase
`the efficacy of sitagliptin due to at least partially the inhibition of GLP—1 metabolism.
`
`Drug Interaction: Co—administration of multiple twice-daily doses of sitaglitpin with
`metformin, an organic cation transporter (OCT) substrate, did not meaningfiilly alter the
`pharmacokinetics of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, sitagliptin is
`not an inhibitor of OCT-mediated transport. Also co-administration of multiple doses of
`metformin with sitagliptin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin in type 2
`diabetic patients (From NDA 21-995).
`
`II
`
`A
`
`Question Based Review
`
`General Attributes
`
`What are the highlights of the chemistry and physico—chemical properties of
`Janumet?
`
`tablets contain 2 oral antihyperglycemic drugs used in type 2 diabetes:
`Janumet
`Sitagliptin phosphate and metformin hydrochloride.
`
`

`

`7—[(3R)-3—amino-l-oxo-4-(2,4,5—
`is described chemically as
`Sitagliptin phosphate
`trifluorophenyl)butyl]—5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-3-(trifluoromethyl)—1,2,4—triazolo[4,3-
`is
`a]pyrazine
`phosphate
`(1:1)
`monohydrate.
`The
`empirical
`formula
`C(6H15F5N50'H3PO4°H20 and the molecular weight is 523.32 and is a white to off—white,
`crystalline, non-hygroscopic powder.
`
`Metformin hydrochloride (N,N -dimethylimidodicarbonimidic diamide. hydrochloride)
`(Figure l) is not chemically Or pharmacologically related to any other classes of oral
`antihyperglycemic agents. Metformin hydrochloride is a white crystalline powder with a
`molecular formula of C4H1 1N5°HCl and a molecular weight of 165.62.
`
`Figure 1: Chemical structure of Sitagliptin (top) and metformin (bottom).
`
`- H20
`
`- H3P04
`
`CH3
`l
`
`/
`
`H3C
`
`3
`\H/ \H/
`
`NH
`
`NH
`
`NH
`
`2
`
`- HCl
`
`What is the proposed mechanism (s) of action and therapeutic indication?
`
`Janumet combines two antihyperglycemic agents with different mechanisms of action to
`improve glycemic control
`in patients with type 2 diabetes: Sitagliptin phosphate, a
`dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and metformin hydrochloride, a member of the
`biguanide class.
`I
`
`Sitagliptin is an orally active DPP-4 inhibitor and a member of a new class of drugs
`intended to treat type 2 diabetes. DPP-4 inhibitors act by enhancing the levels of active
`incretin hormones. These hormones include glucagon-like peptide-l
`(GLP-1) and
`glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) which are released by the intestine in
`response to meal and are part of endogenous system involved in maintaining glucose
`homeostasis.
`'
`
`Metformin hydrochloride is a biguanide antihyperglycemic agent, which improves
`glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes, lowering both basal and postprandial
`plasma glucose. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal
`absorption of glucose and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose
`uptake and utilization.
`
`

`

`_ Janumet is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in
`patients with type 2 diabetes who are already treated with a combination of sitagliptin and
`metformin or whose diabetes is not adequately controlled with either agent alone.
`
`What is the proposed dose and dosage form?
`
`Janumet is available as immediate release tablets. Based on package insErt “The dosage
`of antihyperglycemic therapy with Janumet should be individualized on the basis of the
`patient’s current
`regimen, effectiveness, and tolerability while not exceeding the
`maximum recommended daily dose of 100 mg sitagliptin and 2000 mg metformin.
`
`A
`
`Janumet should generally be given twice daily with meals, with gradual dose escalation,
`to reduce the gastrointestinal (GI) side effects due to metformin.
`
`Dosing Recommendations
`
`The starting dose of Janumet should be based on the patient’s current regimen.
`Janumet should be given twice daily with meals. The following doses are available:
`50 mg sitagliptin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride
`50 mg sitagliptin/ 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride
`
`For patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy
`For patients not adequately controlled on metformin alone, the usual starting dose of
`Janumet should be equal to 100 mg total daily dose (50 mg twice daily) of sitagliptin plus
`the dose of metformin already being taken.
`For patients inadequately controlled on sitagliptin monotherapy
`For patients not adequately controlled on sitagliptin alone, the usual starting dose of
`Janumet is 50mg sitagliptin/500 mg metformin hydrochloride twice daily. Patients may
`be titrated up to 50 mg sitagliptin/1000 mg metformin hydrochloride twice daily. Patients
`taking sitagliptin monotherapy dose-adjusted » for renal
`insufficiency should not be
`switched to Janumet.
`
`For patients switching from sitagliptin co-administer-ed with metformin
`For patients switching from sitagliptin co-administrated with metformin, Janumet may be
`initiated at the dose of sitagliptinand metformin already being taken.
`No studies have been performed specifically examining the safety and efficacy of
`Janumet
`in patients previously treated with other oral antihyperglycemic agents and
`switched to Janumet. Any change in‘therapy of type 2 diabetes should be undertaken with
`care and appropriate monitoring 'as changes in glycemic control can occur.”
`
`

`

`B
`
`I General Clinical Pharmacology
`
`What are the design features of the clinical pharmacology and clinical studies used
`to support dosing or claims?
`‘
`
`No clinical studies with the drug product were performed in support of this submission.
`Consistent with the requirements for a 505 (b) (2) application, the clinical pharmacology
`studies were performed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of the combined drug product
`to the commercially available reference products.
`'
`
`Two doses of the sitaglitpin/metformin fixed dose tablet (50 mg/SOO mg and 50 mg/ 1000
`mg) were evaluated in bioequivalence study. The doses selected for the fixed dose
`combination tablets were based on the sitagliptin Phase II dose—ranging studies (P010 and
`P014). Study P014 evaluated sitagliptin 100 mg per day administered as a twice—daily
`dose (50 mg bid) or a once-daily dose (100 mg qd) and results indicated that both
`provided similar tolerability and reduction in glycemic endpoints. A Phase II add—on to
`metformin study (P015) was conducted in parallel to the dose-ranging study and results
`indicate that dosing of 50 mg bid or 100 mg qd sitagliptin resulted in similar overall drug
`exposures and comparable efficacy and safety of sitagliptin when administered as 50 mg
`bid or 100 mg qd in combination with metformin.
`
`4 PK studies were included in the clinical development program for the FDC tablets (2
`BE studies, one PD study and one DDI study). A pilot BE study was conducted with
`probe formulations (P038) and data from this study was used to develop the final market
`image (FMI) sitagliptin/metformin FDC tablets. A pivotal BE study (P048) was
`conducted in order to demonstrate bioequivalence between the FMI tablets and co-
`administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual tablets
`and therefore used to bridge the clinical safety and efficacy data for co-administration of
`sitagliptin and metformin to the FDC tablets.
`
`Study P050 was conducted to explore the complementary mechanisms of action of
`sitagliptin and metformin by determining the effect of administration of sitagliptin alone
`and metformin alone or in combination on active GLP-1 and GIP levels and glucose
`concentrations.
`
`Study P012 was a drug interaction study between sitagliptin and metformin in type?
`diabetic patients (also submitted with original NDA 21-995 for Januvia).
`
`What is the pharmacodynamic effect resulting from concomitant administration of
`sitagliptin and metformin?
`
`In order to assess whether concomitant administration of metformin and sitagliptin
`resulted in enhanced post meal active GLP—l and/or GIP concentrations compared with
`administration of sitagliptin alone, metformin alone or placebo, a randomized, placebo-
`controlled, double-blind, double~dummy, 4-period crossover study was conducted in
`
`

`

`healthy adult subjects The treatments shown below were administered following a
`overnight fast and with a minimum 7-day washout period.
`
`‘ Snagllpun aiohe '
`
`_ Day2: AM (Rambo(0.1901113 53231192111
`and-1000 m metiomm '
`
`De} 2: AM (9m to 190-mgsitagliptin”
`
`-Dayt: AM(macaw to loo-mg
`'
`_
`mdpkceboto‘OOm mezfgnhin)
`PM(Placebo(a 500mg malformin)
`
`.
`
`In this study PK analysis was not done. On day 2 of each treatment, blood samples were
`collected for determination of active GLP-1 and GIP concentrations, plasma glucose
`concentrations. The primary endpoint was 4h post meal total GLP-l, ratio of active to
`total GLP-l. GIP concentrations after concomitant administration of sitagliptin and
`metformin with administration of sitagliptin alone, metformin alone and placebo. DPP—4
`inhibitory activity was not assayed.
`
`The total GLP-l plasma concentrations were determined at Day 2. The geometric means
`pre—dose (fasting) and post-meal total GLP—l concentrations (pM) are shown in Figure 2.
`The 4-h post-meal average GLP-l concentrations were significantly increased after
`concomitant administration of sitagliptin and metformin compared with administration of
`sitagliptin alone; while it was similar to that of administration of metformin alone. The 4—
`h post meal average total GLP—l concentrations were significantly decreased after
`administration of sitagliptin alone as compared to placebo and increased following
`administration after metformin (Figure 2).
`
`Appears This Way-
`On Original
`
`

`

`Figure 2: Total GLP—l concentrations versus time on'Day 2 after concomitant
`administration of sitagliptin and metformin and after administration of sitagliptin
`alone, metformin alone andplacebo in healthy adult subjects.
`50
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`. , V . . . .V,.p ,
`
`
`
`
`as O.
`
`.A',Q.Q0.v
`m_w.<
`
`
`Totalsun—1(pm-z.
`
`'
`-
`{Min}
`
`" 4
`
`‘0
`(mu?)
`
`'
`
`-'
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`Hours Posfldeal
`§yg3mmm<mof msmg.638ng and mac my; mama
`mum
`
`.*
`~
`
`levels were significantly increased after concomitant administration of
`Active GLP-l
`sitagliptin and metformin compared with administration of metformin alone or placebo.
`The 4-h GLP-l levels were also increased with sitagliptin alone and metformin alone as
`compared to placebo (Figure 3). Administration of metformin alone increases circulating
`concentrations of both active and total GLP—l
`to similar extent suggesting the effect of
`metformin is primarily due to increase in total GLP—l concentrations. Sitagliptin therefore
`appears to stabilize the active GLP-l since it increases the active form of GLP-1.
`
`\‘K
`
`Figure 3: Active GLP-l levels after concomitant administration of sitagliptin and
`metformin versus administration of sitagliptin alone, metformin alone and placebo
`.
`.
`..
`-
`in healthy adult subjects.-
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.-'<‘>,’8,.8
`mateotm(pM)_
`
`
`
`.:14
`
`
`
`_*
`(3&9? .
`
`'4 a
`"
`
`'
`
`.
`
`So
`‘ (mean
`
`1
`
`2
`
`'
`
`3
`
`4
`
`_ Hours Post—Meal
`
`«Slugs
`immmiefiolMmeangfiiawimamgmm
`1090 MM
`IPM
`
`

`

`The ratio of active to total GLP-l concentrations after administration of sitagliptin alone
`is
`increased by 100%. On the other hand,
`total GIP concentrations
`following
`administration of both metformin and sitagliptin were similar to that when the drugs were
`given alone. While, active GIP concentrations increased after concomitant administration
`of sitagliptin and metformin as compared to metformin alone or placebo. The ratio of 4-h
`post meal average ratio of active to total GIP concentrations after concomitant
`administration of sitagliptin and metforrnin compared with sitagliptin alone were similar.
`The ratio increased slightly with concomitant therapy when compared to metforrnin alone
`or placebo.
`
`(Note: The GLP-l level at the-2 h time point on Day 2 (Figure 2 & 3) is much higher for
`the concomitant treatment group as compared to the individual drugs and placebo. This
`could be due to the fact that GLP-l levels may already have started to rise after Day 1
`dose of the 2 drugs.) ~
`.
`t
`
`Glucose concentrations pre-meal and at 2 h post meal (4 h post-dose) were similar
`between all active treatments and placebo in this study.
`
`This study indicates that metformin can increase GLP-l levels. The results of the current
`study suggest a complimentary and potentially additive effect of the combination therapy
`with sitagliptin and metformin however the glucose-lowering effects in patients with type
`2 diabetes with concomitant administration for longer duration is unknown.
`
`C
`
`Intrinsic Factors
`
`The effects of various intrinsic factors (e.g., hepatic, renal, gender, elderly) were provided
`in the original NDA for each drug.
`
`D
`
`Extrinsic Factors
`
`Is there any drug—drug interaction between sitagliptin and metformin?
`
`No.
`
`No drug interaction study was conducted with the fixed-dose combination tablet. Drug-
`drug interaction between sitagliptin and metformin was conducted under the original
`NDA submission for Januvia. (sitagliptin) and was referred to in this NDA. The
`conclusions from that study (P012) are as follows:
`
`Co-administration of multiple twice-daily doses of sitaglitpin with metformin, an OCT .
`substrate, did not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of metforrnin in patients with
`type 2 diabetes. Therefore, sitagliptin is not an inhibitor of OCT-mediated transport. Also
`
`

`

`co-administration of multiple doses of metforrnin with sitagliptin did not alter the
`pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients Therefore sitagliptin and
`metformin do not have any effect on pharmacokinetics of each other (From Dr. Wei’3
`Clinical Pharmacology review of NDA 21 —,995 Januvia)
`
`E
`
`General .Biopharmaceutics
`
`What is the formulation of Janumet tablets?
`
`Two drug strengths were selected for the development, containing 50 mg of sitagliptin
`phosphate and either 500 mg or 1000 mg of metforrnin hydrochloride in an immediate-
`release oral tablet and supplied as a film coated tablet. The compositions for the two
`dosage forms are shown in Table 1.
`
`Table 1: Composition of Janumet tablets
`
`Core Tablet
`Snagiiptin Phosplmte
`(asmlodtmpmshatea_-
`Metfernn‘nflydtochiofide

`'
`Mict'ccxvstalkue (3&1!me
`. _Poiymfip}urolidone.'( A )
`Sodiumfit931}!!th '
`
`_ Sodimimuyl Suifate
`
`'
`
`
` I}org-(table:
`.
`'
`‘
`f
`'
`. m
`.
`Active
`63‘2-5
`,
`..
`,
`i USP Phfiur. Acme.
`31000
`.NF. Phi Eur
`138?;Pb. Eur
`~ "NF.I’tiEar
`NF. PhiEiw
`
`
`
`-
`
`Core Tablet Weight
`Film Coating-Swami:
`
`M
`,
`
`
`l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`.
`FflmGoatedTabiet
`'
`"'
`KVJ'4- f
`I
`a
`
`
`
`
`
`H
`
`$1.6
`
`Is the dissolution method appropriate for Janumet tablets?
`
`Please refer to Chemistry review for dissolution details.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Bioeguivalence Studv:
`
`Are the combination tablets of sitagliptin and metformin (50mg/500 mg and 50
`mg/1000 mg) bioequivalent
`to concomitant dosing of sitaglitpin 50mg and
`metformin- 500 mg or 1000 mg (50 mg + 500 mg; 50 mg + 1000 mg) commercial
`tablets in healthy subjects?
`
`Yés.
`
`two-period crossover study
`randomized,
`The BB study. (P048) was an open-label,
`conducted in two parts: Part
`I determined the bioequivalence of
`the FMI
`sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg FDC tablet and concomitant administration of
`corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin as individual
`tablets and Part II
`determined the bioequivalence of the FMI sitagliptin/metformin 50/1000 mg FDC tablet
`and concomitant administration of corresponding doses of sitagliptin and metformin (2 x
`500 mg) as individual tablets. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h post-dose for
`pharmacokinetic analysis (half-life for sitagliptin ~14 h and metformin~ 2—4 h), with 7-
`days washout between periods. Subjects (N =24; 8 males; 16 females) received all
`treatments after an overnight fast. The treatments were:
`
`Treatment C“
`
`_ -
`
`A single 504112 'dojs'éjefsi glip mend 3900.413 dose ofmetforme ..
`a SOO-mgggcneric, Ageless); as individualtablets; given
`.
`.
`,
`concomitant} .
`fl
`,
`‘
`;
`p
`:
`g, _ .
`A single doseoftlxe9FMI sitagliptinfmetfomfin soaooc‘mgxmg-mc -.
`tablet.
`;
`_
`-
`I,
`'
`.
`TMI-‘Final‘marketimage.
`
`7
`
`a
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`
`Part I Results: (FMI sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg FDC tablets vs. concomitant
`administration)
`
`after
`sitagliptin and metformin plasma concentration-time profiles
`The mean
`administration of a single dose of the sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg FDC and
`concomitant administration of individual tablets are shown in Figure 4. As shown the
`profiles were superimposable.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Figure 4: Mean sitagliptin (top) and metformin (bottom) concentration-time profiles
`after administration of administratiOn of a single dose of the sitagliptin/metformin
`50/500 mg FDC and concomitant administration of individual tablets (50 mg + 500
`31g) ,
`,V
`
`"c:
`.;1-
`.
`1:
`
`
`to
`musswsoo
`
`.
`. 505.00
`_'
`
`
`
`'
`
`.
`.
`
`309
`
`.5
`'8:
`3°
`i3: «s
`-
`E 200 .'
`m v
`A
`
`.
`
`"
`
`-
`
`
`
`g. 1003'
`5x '
`_v
`i
`E D'
`.
`o- s .12
`.
`'
`
`1
`
`_‘
`
`.
`
`16
`
`..
`

`
`-
`a
`.
`24' 30‘38 42 :48
`Time-(hr)
`
`,
`V V, j
`.69 .66y1072
`
`54
`
`
`
`
`
`Metformin’Eia'lsma‘ConcentrationingfmL)
`
`{200
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`:0 g'sndividualrablets 501600 .
`
` _
`
`
`
`- .- iv FDC iabietSO/SOO :
`
`
`‘5”0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`4
`
`so: 66' 12
`54
`18 250.33 42
`.
`' J
`,
`V
`Timemr) C"
`I
`V,
`The pharmacokinetic parameters for sitagliptin and metformin were also similar
`following the two treatments. The geometric mean rations (FDC tablet/concomitant
`administration) and corresponding 90% confidence interval for the AUCinf and Cmax of
`sitagliptin as well as metformin fell within the prespecified bounds of 80-125% indicating
`bioequivalence (Table 1). Additionally there were no difference observed in Tmax and
`apparent tl/2 for both components following administration of the two treatments.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Original
`
`12
`
`

`

`Table 1: Summary statistics of sitagliptin and metformin after administration of
`administration of a single dose of the sitagliptin/metformin 50/500 mg FDC and
`concomitant administration of individual tablets _(50 mg + 500 mg) (N= 24)
`
`
`
`Metformin
`
`
`
`
`Sitagliptin
`
`
`
`LS Mean LS
`Reference Mean
`Test
`
`Parameter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ratio
`(90%CI)
`
`LS Mean LS Mean Ratio (90%CI)
`Reference Test
`
`
`
`98.10 (96.48 —
`
`
`99.75)
`
`
`
`
`
`99.76(93.67—
`99.71 (93.71 —
`106.09) '
`
`106.24)
`
`
`
`7.261
`
`7.250
`
`99.85 (95.47—
`104.43)
`
`
`
`1180.178
`
`1177.330
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"AUCinf
`.
`
`4.085
`
`4.007
`
`414.73
`
`413.51'r
`
`Part II Results: (FMI sitagliptin/metformin 50/1000 mg FDC tablets vs. concomitant
`administration)
`
`The mean sitagliptin and metformin plasma concentration time profiles after
`administration of the two treatments are presented in Figure 5. As shown the profiles of
`both components following the two treatments are similar. The summary statistics are
`provided in Table 2. The 90% confidence interval for AUCinf and Cmax for both
`sitagliptin and metformin were within the 80-125% range. There were no differences
`observed in other PK parameters of sitagliptin and metformin between the two
`treatments.
`
`Figure 5: Mean sitagliptin (top) and metformin (bottom) concentration-time profiles
`after administration of administration of a single dose of the sitagliptin/metformin
`50/1000 mg FDC and concomitant administration of individual tablets (50 mg +
`1000 mg)

`
`
`
`
`
`MK-0431PlasmaConcentrationmm aO
`
`O n
`0
`
`'8 Individual 16161655011000
`.0.
`FDC tablet 50110007:
`
`.'
`
` .;_
`
`e
`
`12
`
`18
`
`24
`
`36 42 ‘48
`30
`Time(hr)‘
`
`5'4
`
`so
`
`as 372]
`"
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`MenorminPIééhaCohéentration(091001.)
`
`individual mums 50110007
`B Foo 1811;145:5011ng -.
`._
`':-
`
`‘
`
`
` ja
`
`
`1,'858‘g‘3‘?
`
`e .12 518' 34’1391'581142.
`'
`n’mé.(hr)-
`
`.45
`
`’:
`
`..
`
`Table 2: Summary statisticswof sitagliptin and metformin after administration of
`administration of a single dose of the sitagliptin/metformin 50/1000 mg FDC and
`concomitant administration of individual tablets (50 mg + 1000 mg) (N= 24)
`
`
`Parameter
`
`
`
`
`
`LS Mean LS
`Reference Mean
`Test
`
`4.053
`
`3.938
`
`423.29
`
`397.172
`
` Metformin
`Sitagliptin
`
`
`
`
`LS Mean LS Mean
`
`Ratio
`Reference Test
`
`(90%CI)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11.869
`
`99.99 (93.55 —
`97.17 (95.00 —
`11.868
`
`
`
`106.87)
`99.39)
`
`
`
`
`
`1870.22
` 93.83 (87.51 —
`1848.044
`101.20
`(93.21
`
`— 109.88)
`
`100.61)
`
`
`
`
`
`Ratio (90%CI)
`
`3
`
`
`
`F
`
`Analytical
`
`Have the analytical methods been sufficiently validated?
`
`Sitagligtin .
`
`14
`
`

`

`Table: Mean accuracy and precision of sitagliptin plasma samples analysis _
`
`,
`
`V
`
`V
`
`‘
`
` ,E, "guytm' uA—mmzvnrm‘»_(w..a.¢,.
`
`,.
`
`__
`
`We a, ,M
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket