throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`22-030
`
`MEDICAL REVIEW! S)
`
`

`

`Financial Disclosure Review
`
`Form FDA 3455 (“Financial Interests and Arrangements of Clinical Investigators”),
`dated Feb. 13th 2006, was submitted and reviewed by this clinical reviewer. In
`accordance with 21 CFR Part 54.4, certification and disclosure requirements, forms of
`clinical investigator certification and financial disclosure were also provided by Schwarz
`BioSciences, Inc.
`'
`
`In this financial disclosure submission all investigators have provided financial disclosure
`information via questionnaires.
`
`No clinical investigator participating in the submitted studies from any of the study sites
`had any disclosures in the categories of compensation potentially affected by the outcome
`of the covered study [21 CFR 54.4(a)(3)(i), 54.2 (a)], significant payments of other sorts
`from the sponsor of the covered study [21 CFR 54.4 (a)(3)(ii), 54.2(i)], proprietary
`interest in the tested product [21 CFR 54.4(a)(3)(iii), 54.2(c)], or significant equity
`interest in the sponsor of the covered study product [21 CFR 54.4(a)(3)(iv), 54.2(b)].
`
`Reviewer ’s Comment:
`
`i There is no reason to suspect that the results ofany ofthe studies submitted in support of
`this NDA were compromised due to financial arrangements between the sponsor and the
`clinical investigators.
`
`Appears This Way
`On Orig/ting,
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Suresh Kaul
`
`10/20/2008 03:39:50 PM
`MEDICAL OFFICER '
`
`

`

`NDA 22-030
`
`Medical Officer’s Review: Complete Response to Approvable
`
`Date Submitted:
`Date Received:
`Date Review Completed:
`PDUFA Goal Date:
`
`May 1, 2008
`. May 1, 2008
`October 9, 2008
`November 3, 2008
`
`-
`Drug Product:
`Dose and Formulation:
`Sponsor:
`
`Toviaz (fesoterodine fumarate)
`4mg and 8mg extended-release tablets
`Pfizer, Inc
`New York, NY.
`Indication: Treatment of overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary
`incontinence, urgency and urinary frequency.
`'
`
`1.
`
`Regulatory History
`
`NDA 22—030 was initially submitted by Schwarz Pharma and accepted for filing by the FDA on
`March 17, 2006 for the indication “treatment of symptoms that may occur in subjects with
`overactive bladder syndrome”.
`
`Under terms of an agreement with Pfizer, Inc., effective June 13, 2006, Schwarz Pharma
`transferred all of its rights in fesoterodine to Pfizer on an exclusive world wide basis.
`
`In an Approvable letter to Schwarz Pharma on January 25, 2007, FDA requested: 1) that all
`manufacturing sites be made ready for pre-approval inspection, 2) that revised labeling be
`submitted, and 3) that another Safety Update'be submitted, to include data from all non-clinical
`and clinical fe'soterodine studies since the previous Safety Update.
`
`This review focuses on the requested Safety Update submitted in the Complete Response to
`Approvable action. This final update includes new safety data, obtained since the cutoff date of
`the original NDA (October 14, 2005), from 3 long-term, open-label extension studies completed
`by Schwarz Pharma (Studies SP669, SP73 8, and SP739), and an ongoing 12-week, open-label
`study (A0021007), initiated by Pfizer, with data included as of January 1, 2008.
`'
`
`In addition, this Complete Response to Approvable includes two new Phasel studies completed
`by Schwarz Pharma (Studies SP857 and SP877) and three new Phasel studies conducted by
`Pfizer (Studies A0221004, A0221015 and A0221044) since the NDA. The Clinical Safety
`Update includes summarizes of safety from these 5 new Phase 1 studies.
`
`

`

`1.0 2. Extent of Exposure to Fesoterodine
`
`2.1
`
`Overview of Extent of Exposure to Fesoterodine
`
`The following table presents the study design, number of subjects who received fesoterodine,
`and duration of treatment in Study SP669, an extension of the Phase 2 study SP668, and one of
`the three open-label, long-term extension studies.
`
`Table 1.
`
`Phase 2 open label studies of fesorerodiue in subjects with overactive bladder
`(Schwarz)
`
`
`
`#5 Subjects
`receiving
`placeboa
`
`Menu treatment
`duration on
`fosoterodine
`
`Study number/study tlesign-‘dosage
`
`.J-F' Subjects
`recein’ng
`fesoterodiue“
`186 (125 new
`exposmesb)
`
`SP6691'Extension of SP668/ 2-phase
`nuxlticenter, double-blind and open—label, long—
`rem: study to assess safety, tolerability, and
`efi‘icacy in OABI' fesotetodine SR 4mg, Sing,
`and 12mg doses once daily in the double-blind
`phase; fecoterodine 4mg and 8mg doses once
`dailyinthe I - vI labelphase
`OAB=ovexactive bladder, SR==sustained release
`1 These subject exposmes are based on the safety set (SS).
`1). New exposures include 20 subjects who previously received placebo in the preceding double-blind study, and
`105 “de novo“ subjects who enrolled directly into SP669 without having participated in SP668.
`
`Table 2 presents the study design, number of subjects who received fesoterodine, and durations
`of treatment in Studies SP738 and SP739, the two, open-label, long-term extension studies to the
`Schwarz Pharma Phase 3 studies SP5 83 and SP5 84, respectively.
`
`Table 2.
`
`Phase 3 open label studies of fesntermline in subjects with overactive bladder
`(Schwarz)
`
`# Sub'ects
`
`
`Stugy imméwr/study
`receding
`Sign, usage
`fesoterodine‘
`
`
`SP738lExtusion of SP583/
`417 (218nm
`nmlticenter, open—label, long-tum
`fesoterodine
`
`
`
`safety and efiicacy in OABI
`exposuos)”
`
`
`
`fssoterodine 4:11; and 8mg doses
`once dail
`
`
`473 (158 new
`
`SP739IExtensiou ofSP584I
`
`fesoterodine
`mnlticenter, open-label, long—tum
`
`
`safety and eficaeyin OAB/
`
`memos)”
`
`
`.fcsctexodine 41113 and 8mg doses
`once daily
`
`
`OAB=ovexactive bladder, NA=not applicable, SR=snstained telease
`a. “race subject exposures are based onthe safetyseKSS) for each study.
`is. New equosuses are defined as those who previously received placebo or tolterodine in the preceding double—blind
`studies.
`
`Mean treatment
`duration
`695 days
`
`584 days
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`# Sub'ects
`receii-ing
`laceho'
`NA
`
`it Subjects
`receiving active
`control'
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`
`
`
`
`The following table presents the study design, number of subjects receiving fesoterodine, and the
`duration of treatment in the Study A0021007, the new, open-label, Pfizer study in this report.
`
`

`

`
`
`Table 3. Study A0221007: Open-Label Study (Pfizer)
`
`
`
`# Subjects
`receiving
`placebo
`
`# Subjects
`remixing active
`control
`
`Median
`treatment
`duration
`
`Study designidosage
`
`ti Subjects
`receiving
`fesoterodiue
`
`T\V.~'el\‘e-\veek. multicentel: open-
`label study in O.AB- fesotetodiue
`4mg and 8mg (loses once daily
`OAB=o~ceracrive bladder. NA=nol applicable.
`
`2.2
`
`Integrated’Safety Pools in the Final Safety Update
`
`All safety pools are graphically illustrated in the following figure.
`
`Figure 1. Description of safety pools (Schwan Studies)
`
`Phase3Phase2
`
`Open—label
`
`2.3
`
`Overall Extent of Exposure (in Detail)
`
`2,3.1
`
`Schwarz Studies
`
`Table 4 summarizes the overall exposure to fesoterodine in all Schwarz studies, including the
`NDA studies, their open-label extensions, and the 2‘ additional Phase 1 studies since the NDA.
`
`

`

`Table 4.
`
`Schwnrz Studies: Overall fesoterodine exposure
`
`-
`
`
`
`Subj eel-years of
`ex - osure
`
`
`
`~.
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`Phase 1 (Pool P1
`‘
`Intravenous formulation
`Immediate-release formulatian
`
`‘//1«PP?
`Sustained-release formulation-:-
`’
`Additional Phase 1 (not acted)
`
`
`Phase Zn (SPSH)
`
`
`Immediate-release formulanen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ 2sz [1003
`
`
`HE_-——
`
`
`I==IS months
`1606
`.
`
`71-24 months
`145?
`
`
`
`—-—_
`Mean and median duration of exposure
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Population
`
`Mean / median months
`Original NDA
`l-‘SU
`13.51 13.4
`Phase 2/3 ‘ 00182, DB+0L
`21.3 [25.4
`11.71116
`Phase213'00152, 01.0111
`120 I 3.2
`7.6 [3.2
`‘
`Phase 2/3‘00153
`DB=double—blind, FSU=Final Safety Update, NA=not applicable, NDA=New Drug Application; 0L=open—
`label
`
`‘
`
`
`
`a. Percentages based on numbet ofsubjects within each respective pool.
`
`Overall, 2288 subjects received fesoterodine in the Phase 2 and 3 studies and another 525
`received fesoterodine in the Phase 1 studies.
`
`Reviewer ’s Comment: Compared with the original NDA, the mean duration ofexposure
`for Pool S2 increased by 10 months.

`
`2.3.2
`
`Pfizer Studies: Conducted Since the NDA
`
`In the three Pfizer Phase 1 studies (Studies A0221004, A0221015 and A0221044), 106 subjects
`were exposed to fesoterodine. The median duration of exposure for the 53 subjects administered
`fesoterodine 4mg was one day with a range of 1-5 days. The median duration ofexposure for 53
`subjects on fesoterodine 8mg was two days with a range of 2-5 days.
`
`Study A0221007 was a 12-week study with a screening period of 2 weeks in which baseline
`OAB symptoms were assessed prior to baseline. Subjects not satisfied with their previous
`treatment with tolterodine ortolterodine ER and were bothered by OAB symptoms at baseline
`and met all other entry criteria were enrolled. All enrolled subjects were initially treated with
`fesoterodine 4mg QD for the first 4 weeks oftreatment. At Week 4, based upon a discussion
`between the subjects and the investigators of efficacy and tolerability reported by the subjects,
`the investigator either increased the dose to 8mg QD for thoSe who desired greater symptom
`improvement and reported good tolerability, or continued the subjects on 4mg QD dose, for the
`remaining 8 weeks ofthe study.
`
`Five hundred and sixteen subjects with OAB received fesoterodine in Study A0221007. The
`median duration of exposure was 84 days and the range 3 —- 109 days. Four hundred and thirty
`four subjects (434/486; 89.3%) received fesoterodine for > 60 days.
`
`

`

`Formation
`
`Iom Subjects n (0/6)“
`
`E '
`' osure
`S“'°j'~‘“'3““” °f
`
`Table 5.
`Pfizer Studies conducted since the NDA: Overall Fesoterudine Exposure
`
`mm" 1 5M“
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 6.1— 90 days
`
`.
`
`44‘ {86)
`
`Studv A0221007- Median duration of exposure: 84 days; Mean duration of exposure: 19 days;
`
`
`Standard Deviation: 18 days
`Rance: 3 -— 108 dm‘s
`
`a. Percentages based on total number of subjects exposed
`b. Study A0221004: 16 subjects; Study A0221015: 16 subjects; Study A0221044: 36 subjects in a 3-way
`crossover study.
`.
`
`Exposure to Fesoterodine in the Long-Term Studies ~ Pool 82 (Schwarz NDA Open-
`2.4
`Label Studies, All Participants). Pfizer Study A0221007 shown for comparison purposes.
`
`Subjects treated in the open-label periods of the extension studies (Studies SP669, SP73 8, and
`SP73 9) are included in Pool 82. For the first analysis, data from‘prior Double-Blind Treatment *
`Periods are included, while the second analysis included only data from open-label periods.
`
`Safety data from the 12-week, open-label Study A0221007 conducted by Pfizer since the NDA
`are presented alongside to allow comparison.
`
`2.4.1 Treatment duration, maximum daily dose, and daily dose oflongest duration - Pool S2
`
`Pool S2 (SchWarz NDA Open-Label Studies)
`
`In Pool SZ, mean treatment duration was 23 months (range: 1 day to 60 months) for the
`combined DB+OL periods, and 21 months (range: 1 day to 51 months) during OL only. The -
`median maximum daily dose and median dose of longest duration was fesoterodine 8mg/day
`using both analysis approaches in Pool 82.
`'
`
`Study A0221007 (Pfizer)
`
`The median treatment duration in this study was 84 days (range 3 — 108 days). Four hundred and
`forty two subjects were on fesoterodine for 61 — 90 days (442/516 subjects; 86%). The maximum
`daily dose used in this study was fesoterodine 8mg/day and dose of longest duration was
`fesoterodine 4mg/day.
`
`

`

`2.4.2 Exposure by maximum daily dose - Pool S2
`
`Pool S2 (Schwarz NDA Open-Label Studies)
`
`In Pool 82 (DB+OL), most subjects (1040/1055: 99%) received a maximum daily fesoterodine
`dose of 8mg. A total of 522/1040 (50%) of these subjects were exposed to fesoterodine 8mg/day
`for more than 24 months, including 101 (10%) subjects exposed to the 8mg dose for more than
`36 months.
`
`During the OL only periods.(Pool $2) a total of 5 12/1054 (49%) subjects were exposed to
`fesoterodine 8mg/day for more than 24 months, including 78 (7%) exposed to the 8mg'dose for
`more than 36 months.
`
`Study A 022100 7 (Pfizer) '
`
`A total of 25 8/516 (50%) subjects were exposed to fesoterodine 8mg. Two hundred forty four
`subjects (95%) received the 8mg/day for > 70 days.
`
`2.4.3. Exposure by daily dose oflongest duration - Pool S2
`
`Pool S2 (Schwarz NDA Open-Label Studies)
`
`The daily fesoterodine dose of longest duration for most subjects (848/1055: 80%) in Pool S2
`(DB+OL) was 8mg/day. A fesoterodine dose of4mg/day was the daily dose of longest duration
`for 204/1055 (19%) subjects, while fesoterodine lng/day was the daily dose of longest duration
`for 3/1055 (<l%) subjects.
`‘
`
`Among subjects in Pool S2 (DB+OL) for whom 8mg/day was the daily dose of longest duration,
`436/848 (51%) subjects were exposed to fesoterodine 8mg/day for more than 24 months,
`including 92 (11%) exposed to the 8mg/day dose for more than 36 months. When double-blind
`data are excluded, 421/894 (47%) subjects were exposed to fesoterodine 8mg/day for more than
`24 months, including 68 (8%) exposed to the 8mg/day dose for more than 36 months.
`
`_
`
`The daily fesoterodine dose of longest duration for most subjects (894/1055: 85%) in Pool S2
`(0L only) was 8mg/day, while fesoterodine 4mg/day was the daily dose of longest duration for
`161/1055 (15%) subjects.
`
`Study A 0221 00 7 (Pfizer)
`
`The daily fesoterodine dose of longest duration for most subjects in Study A0221007 was
`4mg/day (271/516: 53%), while fesoterodine 8mg/day was the daily dose of longest duration for
`245/516 (47%) subjects.
`
`For the subjects in whom 8mg/day was the daily dose of longest duration, 243/245 (99%)
`subjects were exposed to fesoterodine 8mg/day for > 70 days. For the subjects in whom 4mg/day
`
`

`

`was the daily dose of longest duration, 222/271 (82%) subjects were exposed to fesoterodine
`4mg/day for > 70 days.
`
`2.4.4 Fesoterodine dose modifications (luring open-label treatment —— Pool S2
`
`Pool S2 (Schwarz NDA Open-Label Studies)
`All subjects started on afesoterodine dose of 8mg/day, but were allowed to switch to 4mg/day,
`and back to 8mg/day on an annual basis (except for SP669 where a decrease to 4mg/day and a
`subsequent dose increase back to 8mg/day was allowed only once during the study). The
`majority of subjects (825/1055: 78%) remained on the open-label starting dose of fesoterodine
`8mg/day. A total 0f178/ 1055 (17%) subjects reduced their dose to 4mg/day, and remained on
`this dose. Forty—three subjects (4%) re-escalated to fesoterodine 8mg/day.
`‘
`
`Study A0221007 (Pfizer)
`
`In this open-label study all enrolled subjects were initially treated with fesoterodine 4mg/day for
`the first 4 weeks oftreatment. At Week 4, based upon a discussion between the subjects and the
`investigators of efficacy and tolerability reported by the subjects, the investigator either
`increased the dose to 8mg/day for those who desired greater symptom improvement and reported
`good tolerability, or continued the subjects on 4mg/day dose, for the remaining 8 weeks ofthe
`study.
`
`Two hundred and fifiy eight subjects (258/516: 50%) remained on the open-label starting dose of
`fesoterodine 4mg/day. A total of255/516 (49%) subjects increased their dose to 8mg/day, and
`remained on this dose. One other subject who had titrated up to 8mg/day then titrated down to
`4mg/day and subsequently titrated up to 8mg/day again and another subject who had titrated up
`to 8mg/day titrated down to 4mg/day. There was one subject who had received 8mg/day
`through-out the study.
`'
`
`'
`
`Exposure to Fesoterodine in the Long-Term Studies — Pool S3 (All Phase 2/3
`2.5
`Schwarz Studies, Fesoterodine-Treated Subjects Only)
`
`In Pool S3, median treatment duration was 23 months. Most subjects received fesoterodine
`8mg/day.
`‘
`
`2.5.1 Exposure by maximum daily dose — Pool S3
`
`Among subjects treated with any dose of fesoterodine (Pool S3), 1759/2288 (77%) were exposed
`for up to 24 months. An additional 529/2288 (23%) subjects were exposed to fesoterodine for
`more than 24 months, including 105/2288 (5%) subjects who were exposed for more than 36
`months.
`-
`'
`
`The maximum daily dose of fesoterodine received by most subjects (1554/2288: 68%) in Pool S3
`was 8mg. Fesoterodine 4mg/day was the maximum dose for 512/2288 (22%) subjects, while
`fesoterodine 12mg/day was the maximum daily dose for 222/2288 (10%) subjects.
`
`

`

`2.5.2 Exposure by daily dose oflongest duration — Pool S3
`
`Among subjects treated with fesoterodine (Pool S3), the daily fesoterodine dose of longest
`duration for most subjects (1362/2288: 60%) was 8mg/day. Fesoterodine 4mg/day was the daily
`dose of longest duration for 715/2288 (31%) subjects, while fesoterodine 12mg/day was the daily
`dose of longest duration for 21 1/2288 (9%) subjects.
`
`2.6
`
`All Treated Subjects From Phase 2/3 Studies — Pool S4 (Schwarz Studies)
`
`Fesoterodine exposure was greatest in the 8mg/day group at 1638 subject—years. This was
`followed by the fesoterodine 4mg/day group at 433 subject—years, and the fesoterodine 12mg/day
`group at 43 subject-years.
`
`2.7
`
`Summary of Exposure
`
`Overall, 2288 subjects (Pool S3) received fesoterodine SR in Phase 2 or Phase 3 studies during
`the Schwarz development program for fesoterodine. A total of 529 subjects were exposed to
`fesoterodine for over 24 months, including 105 who were exposed for more than 36 months.
`Median treatment duration .for fesoterodine-treated subjects (Pool S3) was 3.2 months, with most
`subjects receiving fesoterodine 8mg/day.
`
`In the long-term pool, including data from the combined DB+OL periods (Pool S2), most
`subjects took fesoterodine 8mg/day for a mean duration of 23 months, ranging from a minimum
`of 1 day to a maximum of 60 months.
`
`In Study A0221007 a total of 5 16subjects received fesoterodine. Four hundred and forty two
`subjects received fesoterodine for. between 61 —‘90 days (442/516 subjects; 86%) and a further
`25 subjects received the drug for Z 91 days. The median treatment duration was 84 days with
`halfthe subjects who initially received 4mg/day were subsequently exposed to 8mg/day
`. (258/516) while the remaining half chose to continue with 4mg/day.
`
`Reviewer ’s Comment: The extent ofexposure to fesoterodine in clinical trials exceeds
`the ICHguidance criteria. There is safety datafiom >500 subjects and >100 subjects
`exposedfor at least 2years andat least 3years, respectively. M‘ [1(4)
`
`

`

`3.
`
`Subject Disposition in the Studies Comprising the NDA and Final Safety Update
`
`Side-by-side comparisons of subject disposition from the original NDA and this Final Safety
`Update are provided in the following table.
`
`Table 6. Schwarz NDA Open Label Studies: Summary of subject disposition (Pool 82)
`Parameter
`Original NDA
`PSI-
`(01. only)
`[01. only)
`.\'=10:'-5
`_\‘=10:‘-:'~
`in ($6)
`11 (*6)
`
`Subject: treated
`Subjects discontinuing treatment period
`Reasons for discontinuation
`
`Protocol violaticu
`Lack of efilcacy
`Adverse even:
`Unsatisfactory compliance of subject
`Subject withdrew consent
`Losttofollow-up
`’
`
`1055 (105‘)
`390 (3'!)
`
`5 (<1)
`
`1.055 (100)
`
`11 x: 1)
`141 (13)
`150 (14)
`22 (2)
`165 (16)
`72 (7) _
`W
`
`F
`
`=Final Safety Update, NDA=New Drug Application. 0L=open~1abel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In Pool 82 635/1055 60% subjects discontinued treatment prematurely. The most common
`reasons for discontinuation of open-label treatment in Pool 82, as recorded on the study
`termination page of the CRF, were withdrawal of consent (165/1055: 16%), adverse event (AE)
`(150/1055: 14%), and lack of effiCacy (141/1055: 13%). Compared with the original NDA, the
`number of subjects in Pool 82 (CL only) who discontinued treatment prematurely because of
`withdrawal of consent increased by 66 (6%), the number who discontinued because ofABS
`increased by 33 (3%), and the number of subjects who discontinued because of lack of efficacy
`increased by 44 (4%) since the original NDA.
`
`In Comparison, in Study A0221007 a total of 53/5 16 subjects (10%) discontinued from the study
`prematurely. The most common reasons for discontinuing were adverse events and subject
`defaults. Discontinuations from the study were judged to be related to the study drug for 33
`subjects (6%), and a majority ofthem were due to adverse events (29 subjects; 6%). The data are
`summarized in the table below.
`
`Study A0221007: Reasons for Discontinuation from Study
`Table 7.
`Total Number of Sub'ects: 486
`
`Rdatedtosmu- '
`
`I;
`
`Not Related to Stud 1)
`
`, ;
`
`S
`
`'eetdefautted
`
`Number % ofSub'ects
`
`29 '
`4 <1
`
`7(1)
`2 <1
`4 <1
`7(1)
`
`‘
`
`

`

`3.1
`
`All Treated Subjects From Phase 2/3 studies — Pool S3 (Schwarz Studies)
`
`Of the 2288 subjects included in Pool S3, 961 (42%) discontinued treatment prematurely.
`
`Consistent with findings in Pool 82, the most common reasons for discontinuation were AE’s ‘
`(266/2288: 12%), withdrawal of consent (238/2288: 10%), and lack of efficacy (156/2288: 7%).
`
`3.2
`
`All Treated Subjects From Phase 2/3 studies —- Pool S4 (Schwarz Studies)
`
`Of the 2964 subjects included in Pool S4, 1098 (37%) discontinued treatment prematurely.
`
`The most common reasons for discontinuation of treatment in Pool S4 were AE (305/2964;
`10%),- withdrawal of consent.(269/2964; 9%), and lack of efficacy (165/2964; 6%).
`
`In Pool S4, 3% to 8% of subjects in double-blind studies (Studies SP582, SP583, SP584, SP668,
`and SP669DB) discontinued due to an AB, compared with 10% to 24% of subjects in open-label
`studies (SP669, SP738, and SP739). The longer period of observation in the open-label studies
`probably contributes to the higher proportions ofAE-related discontinuations.
`
`Reviewer’s Comment: The subject discontinuation rates and reasonsfor discontinuation
`are reasonablefor this indication. Overall, the available datafiom all Phase 2 and
`Phase 3 studies allowsfor a complete overview ofsafety duringfesoterodine exposure.
`
`3.3.
`
`Summary of Subject Disposition
`
`3.3.1 Schwarz Studies
`
`In the pool of subjects treated long—term (Pool 82), 635/1055 (60%) discontinued treatment
`prematurely, mostly due to withdrawal of consent (165/1055; 16%), AEs (150/1055; 14%), and
`lack of efficacy (141/1055; 13%). In the pool of all subjects (Pool S3), 961/2288 (42%)
`discontinued prematurely, the majority due to AEs (12%).
`
`Disposition among all treated subjects (Pool S4) and reasons for discontinuation were also
`similar to those observed in Pool S3: 37% discontinued prematurely, 10% due to AEs.
`
`3.3.2 StudyA0221007 (Pfizer)
`
`In Study A0221007, 53/516 (10%) subjects discontinued prematurely mostly due to AE’s
`(36/516; 7%) and subjects defaulting (7/516; 1%).
`
`Reviewer ’3 Comment: The shorter duration ofthis study (12 weeks as opposed to long-
`term) is presumably the reasonforfewer discontinuations compared to the NDA open—
`label studies.
`'
`
`10
`
`

`

`4.
`
`Demographic and Other Characteristics of Study Population
`
`Schwarz Studies
`
`Demographic tables were not rerun for the NDA studies conducted by Schwarz for the Final
`Safety Update as these data did not change.
`
`Study A 022100 7 (Pfizer)
`
`Demographic characteristics for Study A0221-007 are presented in the following table. A
`majority of the subjects were white females in the age group 45 — 64 years (mean age of 59.4
`years). The demography of subjects in this study are similar to the subjects enrolled in the studies
`in the NDA.
`‘
`'
`
`Table 8.
`
`Study A0221007: Demographic Characteristics
`
`Total
`Female
`Made
`Number (96) ofSubjecls Number (%) of Subjects Number (96) of Subjects
`N=118
`N=398
`
`N=516
`
`
`
`
`“mm-mm:-
`__—a_—m—
`_——-_1_140.0 — 205.7
`
`4.1
`
`Eligibility Criteria for the DAB Program
`
`4.1.1 NDA Studies (Schwarz)
`
`Eligibility criteria were described in the Summary of Clinical Safety in the original NDA. There
`is no new information concerning eligibility criteria.
`
`4.1.2 _ Study A0221007 (Pfizer open-label study)
`
`11
`
` m-“m 39mm
`
`lam—m—
`97 (18.8)
`
`
`
`—_—14(2.7)
`
`.m- 513cm
`
`Im————E_
`
`_———a-
`
`
`
`

`

`The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study were subjects 2 18 years of age who had been
`treated with tolterodine for their OAB symptoms and had reported dissatisfaction with it. Their
`dissatisfaction with tolterodine treatment was documented in a Treatment Satisfaction Question
`prior to inclusion. The severity of urinary symptoms was also documented prior to inclusion and
`subjects with a mean urinary frequency ofZ 8 micturitions per 24 hours and mean number of
`urgency episodes 2 3 per 24 hours, as verified by a screening micturition diary, were considered
`eligible. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of fesoterodine on patient
`satisfaction and DAB symptom relief in this group of subjects.
`
`4.1.3 Phase 1 Studies .
`
`Schwarz Phase 1 studies
`
`Two Phase 1 studies have been completed since the original NDA by Schwarz: Study SP857, a
`randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study to investigate safety and
`tolerability of fesoterodine in healthy Japanese males, and Study SP877, a randomized, open-
`label, crossover study to investigate dose proportionality of the 4mg and 8mg tablets.
`
`Pfizer Phase 1 studies
`
`An additional three Phase 1 studies have been cOmpleted by Pfizer since the NDA: Studies
`A0221004, A0221015, and A0221044. Study A0221004 was a double—blind, placebo-controlled,
`multiple dose, randomized study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine
`sustained release tablets in healthy male subjects. Study A0221015 was another double-blind,
`placebo-controlled, multiple dose, randomized study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics
`of fesoterodine sustained release tablets in healthy male subjects. Study A0221044 was an open-
`label, randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover study to determine bioequivalence oftwo newly
`developed 4 mg and 8 mg dose-normalized formulations E1 of fesoterodine sustained release
`tablets as well as to determine bioequivalence of 8 mg formulation E1 and 8 mg formulation F of
`fesoterodine sustained release tablets in healthy subjects.
`
`Reviewer’s Comment: For complete review ofthese Phase 1 studies, the reader is
`referred to the Clinical Pharmacologist ’s review.
`
`4.2
`
`Summary of Demographics and Baseline Characteristics ’
`
`As no new subjects were exposed to fesoterodine for this Safety Update in the NDA studies,
`there areno overall changes to the demographics and baseline characteristics. Concomitant
`medication use during long-term studies was similar to that observed in the original NDA.
`The demographic characteristics ofthe subjects in Study A0221007 were broadly comparable to
`the subjects enrolled in the NDA studies. Majority of the subjects were white females with a
`mean age of 59 years. This was similar to that seen in the NDA.
`
`12
`
`

`

`5.0
`
`Adverse Events in the Safety Update
`
`The following AB results represent the cumulative data until finalization for Pools $2 and S3...
`Results for Pool 81 and Pool SS are not presented here as these data did not change since the
`original NDA. Data were analyzed in 2 ways for Pool 82. In one analysis, data from Double-
`Blind Treatment Periods and Open-Label Treatment Periods were combined (DB+OL). In the
`' other analysis, only data from Open-Label Treatment Periods were used (0L only).
`
`Common Adverse Events From Long-Term Studies — Pool SZ (Schwarz NDA Open-
`5.1 '
`Label Studies). Study A0221007 (Pfizer) shown for comparison purposes.
`
`Pool 52' (Schwarz NDA Open—Label Studies)
`Table 9.
`Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by 22% of subjects (Pool 32:
`Schwarz NDA Open—Label Studies)
`
`
`
`Preferred term
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`
`
`Original NDA (0L only)
`N=1055
`3
`n
`29w»
`90(9)
`
`
`
`l-‘SU (0L only)
`N=1055
`n %
`3226»
`
`w
`
`m w mm i
`
`s (2)
`33(3)
`W)
`
`m
`m3)
`m2)
`
`_ m
`25(2)
`
`m 20 (2)
`25(2)
`22(2)
`13(2)
`21 (2)
`m
`
`D C
`
`_ 15(1)
`
`m m
`
`13(1)
`13(1)
`
`15m
`FSU==Fmal Safety Update, NDA=New Drug Application, OL=open—1abd
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`we
`
`.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Study A0221007 (Pfizer)
`
`There were 230 subjects who suffered an adverse event in Study A0221007.
`
`Adverse events reported in at least 2% of subjects treated with fesoterodine in Study A0221007
`are presented in the following table and compared with the incidences seen in the NDA open-
`label studies presented above.
`
`Table 10. Study AOZZIOO?: Treatment—emergent adverse events reported by 22% of
`subjects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PSU (NDA 01. only)
`N=1055
`n 96)
`
`Preferred term
`
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FSU=Final Safety Update, NDA=New Drug Application, OIFopen-label ’ = includes the terms abdominal
`pain, abdominal pain lower, abdominal pain upper and abdominal discomfort
`
`The pattern of adverse events seen in Study A0221007 was similar to that seen in the NDA open-
`label studies. The most common AE’s were dry mouth, constipation and headache.
`
`Appears This Way
`' On Original
`
`14
`
`

`

`5.2
`
`Common AEs in Subjects Exposed to Fesoterodine — Pool S3 (Schwarz Studies)
`
`The following table describes the AE’s seen in 2 2 % of subjects in Pool S3 (fesoterodine—treated
`subjects only).
`
`Table 11. Treatment—emergent adverse events reported by 22% of subjects (Pool 53)
`EST:
`
`Preferred term
`Original .\'D.—\
`
`
`
`.\'=2288
`.\'=2288
`
`
`
`11 (cm .
`.\‘ (2’0)
`
`
`
`Dry mouth
`
`
`
`923 (36)
`85.4 (37)
`148(7)
`
`
`
`we
`
`mm
`
`m w
`
`e
`
`’
`
`' m
`,
`m»
`
`we
`
`65(3)
`
`w m m 5
`
`76)
`
`35 (2)
`
`m w w 4
`
`40»
`
`
`
`75(3)
`
`60(3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30w _
`44(2)
`
`
`35 (2)
`47 (2)
`
`Urinary tract infection
`Headache
`
`Constipation
`
`Nasopharyngitis
`Nausea
`
`Back pain
`Diarrhea
`Influenza
`
`Dyspeps’a
`
`Upper respiratory tract infection
`Cough
`
`d
`g
`
`Hynettmsion
`Dizziness
`
`Dry throat
`Sinusitis
`
`Uxinary retention
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`Bronchitis
`Abdominal pain upper
`Gastroesophagml reflux disease
`
`
`
`FSU=Final Safety Update, NDA=N€W Drug Applic'ation
`
`Agogecars this ‘sz
`On Original
`
`15
`
`

`

`5.3
`
`Adverse Events in Phase 1 Studies
`
`Schwarz Phase 1 studies
`
`Since the original NDA, two Phase 1 studies have been completed. In Study SP877, a study of
`single doses of fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg, the most frequent AE was headache. In Study SP857,
`subjects were exposed to single doses of fesoterodine 4, 8, or 16mg or placebo. In this study, dry
`mouth was the most commonly reported AE. There were no SAEs or ABS leading to
`discontinuation in either of these studies. With the exception of 1 event of headache of moderate
`intensity in Study SP877, all AEs reported in these 2 studies were mild in intensity.
`V
`
`Pfizer Phase 1 studies
`
`Pfizer conducted three Phase 1 studies since the NDA. In Study A0221004, a study of
`fesoterodine 4mg and 8mg and placebo administered for five days, the most frequent adverse
`event was somnoience. In Study A0221015, also of fesoterodine 4mg and 8mg and placebo
`administered for five days, the Mist fiequent adverse event was headache. Study AO221044 was
`a randomized, open-label, three—way crossover, single dose study in which the subjects received
`a single fesoterodine 4 mg Formulation El tablet (Treatment A), a single fesoterodine 8 mg
`Formulation E1 tablet (Treatment B) or a single fesoterodine 8 mg Formulation F tablet
`(Treatment C) at the start of each ofthree. periods of the study. The most common AB in this
`study was headache.
`
`There were no SAEs or AEs leading to discontinuation in any of these studies and all AEs
`reported in these three studies were mild or moderate in intensity.
`
`5.4 Time to First Onset of an Adverse Event in Long-term Studies — Pool 82 (Schwarz
`NDA Open-Label Studies). Study A0221007 (Pfizer) shown for comparison purposes.
`
`Pool SZ (Schwarz NDA Open-Label Studies)
`
`The number of subjects reporting first onset of an AB from any system organ class during 0L
`only treatment declined over time. A total of 667/1055 (63%) subjects reported first onset of any
`AE during the first 6 months of open-label treatment, 81/793 (10%) subjects reported first onset
`of any AE during months 7 to 12, 63/680 (9%) subjects reported first onset of an AB during
`months 13 to 24, and 19/512 (4%) subjects reported first onset of any AE during months 25 to
`36. None ofthe 78 subjects with more than 36 months of fesoterodine treatment reported their
`first AE starting after 36 months.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Table 12. Adverse events by period of first onset reported by 25% of subjects overall
`(Pool SZ 0]. only)
`
`Drj: moudi
`
`first onset
`First onset
`first onset
`first onset
` first onset
`
`
`
`
`
`1-6 months
`7—12 months
`13-24 months
`25-36 months
`' >36 months
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.\"=1055
`N=793
`N=680
`_\'=78
`N=Sll
`
`
`
`
`
`n (%)
`n (94»)
`
`
`
`
`Urinary trace infection
`
`
`NOTE: ’f-i’a refers to percentage of subjects among total (N).
`
`Constipation
`
`
`
`First onset of dry mouth and constipation almost always occurred during the first 6 months of
`treatment. There was no clear trend for onset of first urinary tract infection (UTI).
`
`Study A0221007 (Pfizer) .
`
`Study A0221007 was a 12-week open-label study. During this 12-week trial, the first onset of
`dry mouth and constipation occurred in 23% and 5% of all subjects respectively. This w

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket