throbber

`
`
`
`
`
` DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`
`
`NDA 21-976/S-006
`
`
`Tibotec, Incorporated
`Attention: Susan Fiordeliso
`Manager, Global Regulatory Affairs
`1020 Stony Hill Road, Suite 300
`Yardley, PA 19067
`
`Dear Ms. Fiordeliso:
`
`Please refer to your supplemental new drug application dated December 20, 2007, received
`December 21, 2007, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
`(FDCA) for PREZISTA (darunavir) 300 mg and 600 mg tablets.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions dated February 28, 2008, March 28, 2008, April 18,
`2008, April 30, 2008, May 14, 2008, June 13, 2008, June 17, 2008, July 2, 2008, July 21, 2008,
`September 4, 2008 and October 8, 2008.
`
`This supplemental new drug application provides for the use of PREZISTA (darunavir) tablets co-
`administered with 100 mg of ritonavir, for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in
`
` antiretroviral treatment-experienced adult patients.
`
`We completed our review of this application, as amended. This application is approved, effective on
`the date of this letter, for use as recommended in the agreed-upon labeling text and patient labeling.
`We approved this NDA (21-976/000) under the 21 CFR 314 Subpart H regulations for accelerated
`approval of new drugs for serious or life-threatening illnesses. Approval of this supplement and NDA
`21-976, supplement 007, fulfills your commitments made under 21 CFR 314.510, listed as PMCs 1
`and 2 in the June 23, 2006, approval letter:
`
`1.
`
`By December 31, 2007, submit the final study reports and datasets of the 96-week data for the
`ongoing Phase 2b studies TMC114-C202, TMC114-C213, TMC 114-C208, and TMC114-
`C215.
`
`
`2.
`
`By December 31, 2007, submit the final study reports and datasets of the 48 week data for the
`
`ongoing Phase 3 studies TMC114-C211 and TMC114-C214.
`
`
`Approval of this supplement also fulfills the following postmarketing commitments as numbered in the
`June 23, 2006, approval letter. These commitments are listed below:
`
`5.
`
`7.
`
`
` Conduct an in vivo drug-drug interaction study between darunavir/rtv b.i.d. and rifabutin.
`
` Conduct an in vivo drug-drug interaction study between darunavir/rtv b.i.d. and
`carbamazepine.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-976/S-006
`Page 2
`
`
`8.
`
`Complete the ongoing carcinogenicity study in mice and submit the final report.
`
`Complete the ongoing carcinogenicity study in rats and submit the final report.
`
`Please conduct a cocktail study to determine the effects of steady state darunavir/rtv
` 600/100 mg b.i.d. on the metabolism of CYP450 probe substrates for the following
` enzymes: CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`
`
`The following postmarketing commitment acknowledged in our June 23, 2006, approval letter has not
`been completed:
`
`6.
`
`Conduct an in vivo drug-drug interaction study between darunavir/rtv b.i.d. and
`buprenorphine/naloxone.
`
`
`
`12.
`
`
`
`Protocol Submission: by December 31, 2006
`Final Report Submission: by January 31, 2008
`
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submission of June 25, 2008, in support of fulfillment of the
`following postmarketing commitment listed in our June 23, 2006, approval letter:
`
`Conduct a study of darunavir in treatment-experienced female patients to elucidate any
`potential gender differences in efficacy and safety.
`
`Protocol Submission: by December 31, 2006
`
`Final Report Submission: 24 week data by December 31, 2008
`
`
`The submission of June 25, 2008 is currently under review.
`
`
`REQUIRED PEDIATRIC ASSESSMENTS
`
`Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) (21 U.S.C. 355c), all applications for new active
`ingredients, new indications, new dosage forms, new dosing regimens, or new routes of administration
`are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the product for the claimed
`indication(s) in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived, deferred, or inapplicable.
`
`We are waiving the pediatric study requirement for ages 0 to below 3 years of age because of evidence
`strongly suggesting the drug would be unsafe in this pediatric age group. This decision is based on the
`results of juvenile rat toxicology studies that provide evidence of a potential safety risk as a result of
`drug-brain accumulation.
`
`Your deferred pediatric studies required by section 505B(a) of the Federal Food and Drug and
`Cosmetic Act (FDCA) are required postmarketing studies. The status of these postmarketing studies
`must be reported annually according to 21 CFR 314.81 and section 505B(a)(3)(B) of the FDCA. We
`remind you of the deferred pediatric studies as identified in the June 23, 2006, approval letter for NDA
`21-976/000.
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submission of June 20, 2008 in support of fulfillment of
`postmarketing requirement number 3 acknowledged in our June 23, 2006 approval letter:
`
`

`

`NDA 21-976/S-006
`Page 3
`
`
`3.
`
`Deferred pediatric study under PREA for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric patients
`ages 6 to 17 years. Please assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and antiviral activity
`of two alternative doses of a suitable pediatric formulation in combination with ritonavir, in
`treatment-experienced pediatric children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years of age.
`
`
`
`
`The submission of June 20, 2008 is currently under review.
`
`Because we are waiving the pediatric study requirement for ages 0 to below 3 years of age, you are
`released from postmarketing requirement number 4, acknowledged in our June 23, 2006, approval
`letter:
`
`4.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Completed
`
`June 20, 2008
`
`
`Deferred pediatric study under PREA for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric
`patients less than 6 years of age. Please evaluate dose requirements and safety in pediatric
`patients less than 6 years of age with HIV-1 infection after preliminary review of data from
`
`the 6 to 17 year olds in trial TMC114-C212 with the Division of Antiviral Products (DAVP).
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`by December 31, 2008
`
`by June 30, 2011
`
`
`
`
`Postmarketing requirement 4 is now replaced with the following required deferred pediatric study:
`
`
`1.
`
`
`Deferred pediatric study under PREA for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in pediatric
`patients 3 to 6 years of age. Please evaluate dose requirements and safety in treatment-
`experienced pediatric patients 3 to 6 years of age with HIV-1 infection after preliminary review
`of data from the 6 to 17 year olds in trial TMC114-C212 with the Division of Antiviral
`Products (DAVP).
`
`
`
`
`
`Protocol Submission:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`by December 31, 2008
`
`by June 30, 2011
`
`
`
`
`Submit final study reports to this NDA. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to this
`required pediatric postmarketing study must be clearly designated “Required Pediatric
`Assessment(s)”.
`
`
`
`
`POSTMARKETING REQUIREMENTS UNDER 505(o)
`
`Title IX, Subtitle A, Section 901 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
`(FDAAA) amends the FDCA to authorize FDA to require holders of approved drug and biological
`product applications to conduct postmarketing studies and clinical trials for certain purposes, if FDA
`makes certain findings required by the statute (section 505(o)(3)(A), 21 U.S.C. 355(o)(3)(A)). This
`provision took effect on March 25, 2008.
`
`Since PREZISTA was approved in June 2006, for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus
`
`(HIV) infection in antiretroviral treatment-experienced adult patients, we have reviewed new data from
`
`
`juvenile rat toxicology studies submitted with this supplement and have re-analyzed data previously
`
`

`

`NDA 21-976/S-006
`Page 4
`
`
`submitted to FDA from other juvenile toxicology studies. Mortality was observed across all dose
`
`groups in the study of juvenile rats directly dosed at post-natal days (PDN) 5, 8 and 11, as well as
`juvenile rats directly dosed on PND 12. As a result of these findings, we also re-analyzed data from
`
`reproductive toxicology studies. These re-analyses raise a safety concern about the use of PREZISTA
`in pregnant women and neonates. These re-analyses were not available when PREZISTA was granted
`marketing authorization for the treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral treatment-experienced adult
`patients. Therefore, we consider this information to be “new safety information” as defined in
`FDAAA.
`
`We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under
`subsection 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess a signal of serious risk, that is,
`increased mortality and reproductive toxicity in animal studies that may be relevant to pregnant women
`and neonates.
`
`Furthermore, the new pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to establish under section
`505(k)(3) of the FDCA has not yet been established and is not sufficient to assess this serious risk.
`
`Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required, pursuant to
`section 505(o) (3) of the FDCA, to conduct the following study:
`
`2.
`
`Perform a nonclincal reproductive toxicology study in a relevant species which achieves an
`adequate AUC exposure margin (compared to human serum exposure) in order to
`establish the safety profile of darunavir in utero. Submit your protocol for review prior to
`initiation of the reproductive toxicology study.
`
`Protocol Submission:
`Final Report Submission:
`
`
`
`
`September, 2009
`
`April, 2011
`
`
`
`
`
`The timetable you submitted on October 21, 2008, states that you will conduct this study according to
`the following schedule:
`
`
`
`
`Submit the protocol to your IND 62,477, with a cross-reference letter to this NDA 21-976. Submit
`all final reports to your NDA 21-976. Use the following designators to prominently label all
`submissions, including supplements, relating to this postmarketing study requirement as
`appropriate:
`
`
`
`ƒ Required Postmarketing Protocol under 505(o)
`
`ƒ Required Postmarketing Final Report under 505(o)
`
`ƒ Required Postmarketing Correspondence under 505(o)
`
`Section 505(o)(3)(E)(ii) of the FDCA requires you to report periodically on the status of any study or
`clinical trial required under this section. This section also requires you to periodically report to FDA
`on the status of any study or clinical trial otherwise undertaken to investigate a safety issue. Section
`506B of the FDCA, as well as 21 CFR 314.81(b)(2)(vii) requires you to report annually on the status of
`any postmarketing commitments or required studies or clinical trials.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-976/S-006
`Page 5
`
`
`FDA will consider the submission of your annual report under section 506B and 21 CFR
`314.81(b)(2)(vii) to satisfy the periodic reporting requirement under section 505(o)(3)(E)(ii) provided
`that you include the elements listed in 505(o) and 21 CFR 314.81(b)(2(vii). We remind you that to
`
`comply with 505(o), your annual report must also include a report on the status of any study or clinical
`trial otherwise undertaken to investigate a safety issue. Failure to submit an annual report for studies
`or clinical trials required under 505(o) on the date required will be considered a violation of FDCA
`section 505(o)(3)(E)(ii) and could result in enforcement action.
`
`CONTENT OF LABELING
`
`
`As soon as possible, but no later than 14 days from the date of this letter, please submit the content of
`labeling [21 CFR 314.50(1)] in structured product labeling (SPL) format as described at
`http://www.fda.gov/oc/datacouncil/spl/html that is identical to the enclosed labeling (text for the
`package insert and text for the patient package insert). Upon receipt, we will transmit that version to
`the National Library of Medicine for public dissemination. For administrative purposes, please
`designate this submission “SPL for approved NDA 21-976/S-006.”
`
`In addition, within 21 days of the date of this letter, amend any pending applications for this NDA with
`content of labeling in structures product labeling (SPL) format to include the changes approved in this
`application.
`
`Marketing the product with FPL that is not identical to the approved labeling text and in the required
`format may render the product misbranded and an unapproved new drug.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`the Division of Antiviral Products and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package
`insert directly to:
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications
`5901-B Ammendale Road
`Beltsville, MD 20705-1266
`
`
`
`LETTERS TO HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
`
`If you issue a letter communicating important information about this drug product (i.e., a “Dear Health
`Care Professional” letter), we request that you submit a copy of the letter to this NDA and a copy to
`
`the following address:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MEDWATCH
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Suite 12B05
`
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-976/S-006
`Page 6
`
`Please submit one market package of the drug product when it is available.
`
`We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR
`314.80 and 314.81).
`
`If you have any questions, call Stacy Newalu, Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 796-3978.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Enclosure (clean copy of approved labels)
`
`Sincerely,
`
`
`{See appended electronic signature page}
`
`Debra Birnkrant, M.D.
`Director
`
`Division of Antiviral Products
`Office of Antimicrobial Products
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`/s/
`
`---------------------
`Jeffrey Murray
`
`10/21/2008 06:15:29 PM
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket