throbber
Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Tingling/numbness
`
`Site 339 / Subject 2324/ increased tingling all extremities
`Site 367 / Subject 2640/ numbness of hip, numbness of shoulder
`
`Site 025 / Subject 2387/ bilateral heaviness of arms, jittery feeling
`Site 197 / Subject 2007/ diabetes type 2 ,
`
`7.1.3.3 Other significant adverse events
`
`
`Other
`
`None
`
`7.1.4 Other Search Strategies
`
`There is an extensive literature on the safety of sumatriptan and naproxen. See Section 8.6
`
`7.1.5 Common Adverse Events
`
`7.1.5.1 Eliciting adverse events data in the development program
`
`At each visit, the subject spontaneously mentioned problems then the investigator inquired about
`adverse events:-
`
`0
`
`0
`
`"Have you had any (other) medical problems since your last visit/assessment?"
`
`"Have you taken any new medicines, other than those given to you in this study, since
`your last visit/assessment?"
`
`Subjects in the MT400—204 study and the three Phase 3 studies (MT400-301, MT400-302 and
`MT400—3 03) were instructed to record adverse events on diary cards.
`
`Since migraine headaches are typically accompanied by pain, nausea, vomiting, phonophobia
`and photophobia, these specific signs and symptoms were not recorded as adverse events, unless
`the condition worsened.
`
`Investigators were not obligated to actively seek adverse events in former study
`participants, but were instructed to notify Pozen if they became aware of any deaths or SAEs in
`any subject after sign-out from a clinical trial, when the event could have reasonably been related
`to study drug.
`
`7.1.5.2 Appropriateness of adverse event categorization and preferred terms
`
`I examined adverse events as categorized by preferred terms and combination of preferred terms
`(for example, ‘chest pain’ and ‘neck pain’ categories were assembled from several preferred
`
`72
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`terms, see section 7.1.6). Adverse effects were generally not serious and reversible, and derived
`mainly from patient reported symptoms. Adverse events data was generally straightforward
`given the healthy patient population and relative tolerability of Trexima.
`
`7.1.5.3 Incidence of common adverse events
`
`Studies MT400—204, MT400-301 and MT400—302 were single dose efficacy studies of Trexima
`in an outpatient setting. Therefore, objective safety assessments followed treatment with study
`medication by several days, making the measures less useful for safety determinations. Subjects
`recorded subjective adverse events during dosing of study medication.
`
`Phase I studies
`
`MT400-101, 102, 103, 105 (N = 13 to 31 for each)
`Common adverse events reported by healthy volunteers were dizziness, somnolence, nausea, and
`headache. All events were mild except for one case of moderate nausea and vomiting.
`
`Phase II studies
`
`MT400-204, (single-dose outpatient ‘proof of concept’ study)
`Importantly, the dose of sumatriptan in study MT400-204 was 50 mg non—RT, instead of the 85
`mg RT ( _ "
`in the final Trexima formulation. The
`incidences of adverse events were similar in subjects treated with MT400 and sumatriptan (23%
`and 24%, respectively), and higher than the incidences of adverse events with naproxen sodium
`(17%) and placebo (15%). Events occurring in 2% or more of subjects are listed in Table 51
`
`Appears This Way
`On Orlglnal
`
`73
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 51: Adverse Events in 2 2% of subjects, MT400-204
`
`v
`
`Treatment Groups
`
`Body System
`Adverse event
`
`(preferred term)
`
`MT 400
`
`Sumatriptan
`
`50 mg
`
`(non-RT)
`N=229
`
`(sumatriptan
`
`50 mg non—RT +
`naproxen
`sodium
`
`500 mg)
`N=251
`
`Naproxen v
`Sodium
`
`500 mg
`N=250
`
`
`
`Subjects with at least one
`
`58 (23)
`
`adverse event — n (%)
`
`Nervous System Disorders
`
`18 (7)
`
`Dizziness
`
`Somnolence
`
`Paresthesia
`
`General Disorders
`
`Chest tightness
`
`Fatigue
`
`Gastrointestinal Disorders
`
`Dry mouth
`
`Nausea aggravated
`
`Diarrhoea
`
`9 (4)
`
`3(1)
`
`2 (1)
`
`18 (7)
`
`5 (2)
`
`5 (2)
`
`14 (6)
`
`4(2)
`
`1 (<1)
`
`Bar and Labyrinth Disorders
`
`8 (3)
`
`2(1)
`-—
`
`37(15)
`
`11 (5)
`
`8 (3)
`
`1 (<1)
`
`5 (2)
`
`3(1)
`
`18(7)
`
`1(<1)
`
`4(2)
`
`3(1)
`
`2(1)
`
`Tinnitus
`
`6 (2)
`
`2(1)
`
`74
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Phase III studies
`
`The most Common Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events in >2% of Subjects in the Primary
`Safety Population (MT400-301 and MT400-302) are shown in Table 52, while the same data
`with a >1% cutoff is shown in Table 53 . Adverse events are increased in Trexima and
`
`sumatriptan arms versus the other two arms. No clear distinction can be made between Trexima
`and sumatriptan, however. ‘
`I
`
`Table 52: Common Adverse Events, >2%, MT400-301, MT400-302
`
`From Table 2.7.61
`
`Treatment Group
`
`
`
`Trexima
`(sumatriptan 85 mg
`(RT) / naproxen
`
`sodium 500 mg)
`N=737
`
`197 (27)
`
`89 (12)
`
`28 (4)
`
`24 (3)
`
`18(2)
`
`69 (9)
`
`24 (3)
`
`15 (2)
`
`15 (2)
`
`23 (3),
`
`13(2)
`
`'
`
`Any Adverse
`Event
`
`Nervous System
`
`Any Event
`Dizziness
`
`Somnolence
`
`Paresthesia
`
`Gastrointestinal
`
`Any Event
`Nausea
`
`Dry mouth
`
`Dyspepsia
`Cardiac
`
`Any Event
`Chest discomfort
`
`Sumatriptan Naproxen
`85 mg (RT)
`Sodium 500 mg
`
`N=735
`
`N=732
`
`N=752
`
`194 (26)
`
`100(14)
`
`84(11)
`
`63 (9)
`
`16 (2)
`
`17 (2)
`
`17 (2)
`
`71 (10)
`
`21(3)
`
`15(2)
`
`14(2)
`
`26(4)
`
`10(1)
`
`37 (5)
`
`11 (2)
`
`12(2)
`
`2 (<1)
`
`32(4)
`
`5 (<1)
`
`1 (<1)
`
`6 (1)
`
`7 (1)
`
`3 (<1)
`
`35(5)
`
`16(2)
`
`15(2)
`
`3 (<1)
`
`33(4)
`
`10(1)
`
`8(1)
`
`5(1)
`
`6(1)
`
`1(<1)
`
`75
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 53:Common Adverse Events, >1%, MT400—30l, MT400-302
`
`'
`Treatment Group
`Placebo
`Trexima
`Sumatriptan
`Naproxen
`N = 752
`(sumatriptan 85 mg
`85 mg (RT)
`SOdmm
`(RT) / naproxen
`N = 735
`500 mg
`sodium 500 mg)
`N = 732
`
`N=737 0/0)-
`
`An Adverse Eveng
`
`Nervous System
`disorders
`
`197 (27)
`
`89 (12)
`
`194 (26)
`
`63 (9)
`
`100 (14)
`
`37 (5)
`
`Dizziness
`
`Somnouence
`
`Paraesthesaa
`
`disorders
`
`a mouth
`
`osuesaa
`
`Vommn
`
`connectlve tlssue
`
`
`A
`
`84 (11)
`
`35 (5)
`
`16(2)
`
`15(2)
`
`3<<1>
`
`mm
`
`80>
`
`5<<1>
`
`90>
`
`3<<1>
`
`90>
`
`1<<1>
`
`6<<9
`
`1<<1>
`
`5<<1>
`
`3(<1)
`
`
`
`Muscleumness—--
`Neck am
`
`Genera: disorders
`
`Asmema
`
`cardiacaisomer
`
`cheswiscomron
`
`Pantauons
`
`and medrastlnal
`
`ThrO‘attihtness __“
`Vasculardisorders
`
`Homush
`
`‘ Total number of subjects with at least one adverse event
`Source: Section 2.7.4.722
`
`76
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21—926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Moderate/severe ratings were reported by 8 (3%) of subjects in the Trexima treatment
`group, by 7 (2%) subjects in the sumatriptan group, 4 (1%) subjects in the naproxen
`sodium group and 3 (1%) of subjects in the placebo group.
`
`Common adverse events in the long-term safety study (MT400-303) are shown in Table 54.
`find the common adverse events to be similar to those in current sumatriptan and naproxen
`labeling.
`
`I
`
`77
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21 -926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 54: Common Adverse Events, MT400-303
`
`(Table 2.7.4, Safety Update)
`
`Type of Event:
`.
`v
`
`'
`
`Oxeral! Safety
`Popuiatiou
`N= 565
`11(.%)
`
`V
`
`6-M0nth
`Completers
`N=414
`n(%)
`
`/
`
`IZ-Month
`Completers .
`N=362
`n(%)-
`
`V
`
`sfu,bjf¢h£§lWithAtLeastOxie 5.
`‘dL-v’erseiflvent
`.
`
`374(66.2)j_7.'i2.:'
`*
`*
`'
`I
`'3
`
`31, 228(35.1)-1
`,
`
`y :'246f(6:sgojf§gzz f
`.
`
`1'00 (242)
`

`
`5
`
`1,80“(3.11:9333,»
`' 50 (838133"
`>
`v
`'W”3VE.EI4.6 (.8313)
`321:7":2125 (4L4)
`
`1
`
`'
`
`.
`
`a:
`
`(nféctien‘sfind Infestations
`..
`Nasophamyngitls
`,
`_
`
`f
`
`'
`
`L
`
`i
`.1
`; 7
`
`infection
`i1 -.
`influenza
`'
`,
`{\‘Bronehitis
`”fsvtrdifitjesfinal Disorders \
`“Anyi'Ei/em,
`,.

`
`~
`
`‘
`
`_,
`
`2085)
`
`_
`
`_
`
`,
`
`..
`131(2335
`
`, .
`
`23 (56)
`13(33.)
`
`:
`
`. "
`‘Dyspepsia
`~ Abdominal} pain upper
`
`V
`
`5 ”
`
`i
`'
`20 (3S)
`

`
`' d5“6)
`
`EMuscquskeletaISz
`.ConnectiVe{PissneDisordersv
`
`,5:
`

`
`..
`f:
`
`:
`
`.
`
`4
`
`v
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`_
`'Muscie‘tighmessr 1.2-:
`
`iiiii21 (37)
`
`'1
`
`*
`
`2*1407(381713222
`" 47 (1,39)
`34 (94)
`23 (64)
`
`'
`
`17(47)
`l1(3Q)
`-
`
`(
`
`‘
`
`*
`
`‘1
`
`-'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`V
`
`"if .
`
`;
`
`‘
`
`Arthralgia-
`NeCkpain
`'Backpain ,3
`
`,3
`
`E‘NervousSystemDisorders
`
`AnyEvent
`'
`Dizziness
`"insomnia
`
`1
`
`9;
`
`" ' 5'
`
`,
`
`» 94'Ci..i6.6)335231a
`26146)“
`=
`'
`,
`
`,:v,;,16(2.8)
`{15.(27).
`
`~.
`' ,
`1 M
`1
`
`'V ——
`
`'5
`
`78
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`(qgntinuecl)
`
`1 media‘stinalr“
`‘4
`'
`‘ Any event?
`' Pliamgoiarynge
`
` : Respiratory”,
`
`79
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21 -926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Twenty-seven percent of subjects within the overall safety population reported an event judged
`related to Trexima by the investigator. These events were primarily from the gastrointestinal or
`nervous system (Table 55).
`
`Table 55: Common Adverse Events Judged Drug-Related by Investigator, MT400-303
`
`(from table 2:7?63, Safety Update)
`
`p
`
`.
`
`.
`
`'“ ‘VN=555»;
`
`.,
`,
`st
`"ne Adverse Event.
`" gGa rein ~,stxnalDlsorders ’
`
`'
`
`naectl‘ve 1 ,
`
`80
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`7.1.5.4 Common adverse event tables
`
`(see under heading 7.1.5.3)
`
`7.1.5.5
`
`Identifying common and drug-related adverse events
`
`(see under main heading 7.1.5)
`
`7.1.5.6 Additional analyses and explorations
`
`None
`
`7.1.6 Less Common Adverse Events
`
`I examined the table of all treatment emergent adverse events for rare (<2%) but possibly
`significant events (Table 56).
`'
`
`“Cardiac disorders” (listed as ‘chest discomfort, palpitations, chest pain, cardiac flutter’) were
`more common, about equally, for Trexima and sumatriptan versus naproxen and placebo. These
`symptoms are expected given previous adverse events documented for sumatriptan alone.
`
`0 Chest discomfort
`
`0
`
`Palpitations
`
`0 Chest pain
`
`Trexima(%)
`1.8
`
`Sumatriptan(%)
`1.4
`
`1 .1
`
`0.8
`
`1.4
`
`0.8
`
`Similarly, muscle tightness, particularly throat and neck tightness and discomfort, occurred more
`commonly for Trexima and sumatriptan:
`
`0 Muscle tightness
`
`0 Neck pain
`
`o Throat tightness
`
`o
`
`Pharyngolaryngeal pain
`
`Trexima(%)
`1.4
`
`Sumatriptan(%)
`1.2
`
`1.1
`
`1.4
`
`0.7
`
`0.5
`
`1.2
`
`0.8
`
`[Comment neck/throat pain should be included in labeling as a single adverse event]
`
`81
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 56: Adverse Events, Controlled Trials
`
`
`T.ab1e2'7..4722
`'E'reatmen: Emergent: Advez;
`e_ EvTents
`.
`By MedDRA System Organ Class '
`eterredTerm
`
`. Safety Population from Studie
`and 302
`
`
`Treyima
`Sumeriptan
`(14633?)
`{143735}
`
`
`
`fiagroxen
`032732)
`
`-
`
`Placebo.
`(14:75.?)
`
`Subject Had at Least Ema Adverse Event
`' N9
`_.Yes
`
`.
`;
`
`'Ii_ 1
`
`'
`
`_
`. 543} (?3.3%)
`137.
`(253.73.)
`
`.
`
`.
`
`541 {73.6%}
`194 (25.42)
`
`:
`
`'
`
`'532‘(8§.3§s)
`210.043.3324;
`
`,
`658‘ (88.8%)
`simian
`
`
`
`g ‘_
`
`3
`
`-
`
`,
`
`V,
`
`,
`
`"
`
`'
`
`.
`
`-
`
`I 0.1%)
`
`( 0.1%)
`
`I 6.5%}
`
`-
`
`.
`
`'
`
`( 0.14;)
`
`’
`
`g
`‘
`
`,
`
`>
`
`'
`
`,
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`*
`
`'
`
`'
`
`; 35 ("4.7311
`371,5.14} -
`63 ( 8.43%)f :3
`39, (32.1%)
`'
`'VNétvous system disoxders
`.«16 { 2.1%);
`_ 11 «'4 1.5%)
`16 ( 2. 2%}
`. ~ 28’
`( 3.8%}
`Dizziness
`V
`"12] {1.6%} " ~15 ( 24.0%);
`17 (2 3%)
`‘
`.- 2'4 ( 3.3%)
`:Somnolence
`‘17 f 2. 3%}
`. _.
`2 i 0.3%}
`3 ( 0.4%).
`18 l 2.33%)
`=Pa‘raesthesia
`4 i 0. 5%):
`’
`2 (9.3%) ‘
`O
`‘
`’7 (/ 9.9%)
`”Frame:
`,
`3 {0.4%}
`3 ( 0.4%),
`0
`’
`4
`(' 0.5%)
`Earning sensation
`3
`( 0.1%)
`l ( 0.1%)
`2 ( 0.3%)
`4 ,( 0.5%)
`Headache
`i
`l 0.1%)
`0
`0
`3 ( 0.4%)
`Hyparaesthesia
`3.
`( 0.1%)
`:4
`2 ( 0.3%)
`3 (10.4%)
`Vertigo
`5
`g 0.7%}
`0
`0
`2 l 0.3%)
`Hypoaeathesia
`0
`0
`0
`2 ( 0.3%)
`Mental impairment
`0
`O
`1
`2.
`l 0.3%)
`Migraine
`2
`0
`0
`2 ( 0.3%)
`Sensoxy distuxbance
`O
`0
`0
`1_
`‘( 0.192).
`Cognitive disorder
`3 l 0.1%)
`0
`0
`l
`( 0.1%)
`Fertilisation
`_ l
`l 0.1%)
`2 ( 0.3%)
`O
`1
`( 0.1%)
`Insomnia
`> 0
`0
`.
`0
`1
`( 0.1%)
`Restlessness
`,1 i 0.1%)
`l l 0.1%)
`0
`1
`( 0.1%)
`Tension headache
`:1
`' 2 {0.3%}
`0
`{ 0.1%)
`l '( 0.1%)
`Vision blurred
`I
`(3.1%}
`O
`'
`0
`0
`v
`Eyelid ytosis
`. 2 ( 0.3%)
`‘ 0
`0
`0
`_ Hypoaesthesia oral
`i
`( 0.1%)
`0-
`0
`0
`xncranasal paraeschesia
`3.
`( 0.1%}
`0
`1
`0
`.Paxzaesthesia oral
`1 ( 0.1%)
`0
`0
`0
`.E’arosmia
`63 L 8.fi%l
`37 i 5.1%}
`35 ( 4.7%)
`89 (32.1%)
`Nexvcus system disorders wont.)
`0
`1
`{ 0.1%}
`O
`O
`Psychometor hyperactivity
`.
`'70
`1
`i 0.1%}
`O
`0
`Psychometor skilis impaired
`I t 9.1%) ’
`0 .
`0
`0
`Sedation
`1.
`(
`IO..1%)
`0
`0
`O
`Skin burning sensation
`_
`0
`,1 { 0.1%)
`0
`O
`Tinnitus
`'71 ( 9.7%}
`32 E 4.4%)
`33 ( 4.4%)
`69 ( 9.4%)
`Gastrointestinal disorders
`23 (' 2.9%)
`5
`l 0.7%)
`10 l 1.3%).
`24 ( 3.3%) ‘
`Nausea
`15 ( 2.0%)
`1 E 0.1%}
`8 ( 1.3%)
`15 l 2.0%)
`Dry mouth
`14 t 1.9%)
`6 { 0.8%}
`5 i 6.7%)
`15 (2.03s)
`Dyspepsia
`i
`( 0.1%)
`7 i 1.9%
`2 ( 0.3%}
`5 ( 0.7%)
`Abdominal pain upper
`6 (0.8%)
`5
`{ 0.7%)
`5 { 0.7%)
`5 £ 0.73)
`Diarrhoea
`0
`2 E 0.3%)
`0
`_3
`i 9.4%)
`‘Dysgemsia
`6 (0.8%)
`3 t 0.4%)
`9 ( 1.2%)
`3 (10.4%)
`Vomiting
`0
`0
`0
`2 .( 0.3%)
`Eructacion
`2
`( 0.3%)
`l t 0.1%)
`0
`.2 (0.3%)
`flatulence
`8
`I)
`0
`1 ( 0.1%)
`Abdominal distension
`4
`1 i 0.1%)
`0
`1
`( 0.1%}
`Abdominal pain
`0»
`l
`( 0.1%}
`0
`1 ( 0.1%)
`Dysphagia
`1
`0
`0
`1
`( 0.1%)
`Gastric irritation
`:3:
`{5
`0
`1 ( 0.1%)
`Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
`.0
`0
`0
`1
`( 0.1%)
`Lip dry
`0
`1 ( 0.1%)
`0
`0
`Abdominal tenderness
`.
`i)
`i
`f 0.1%}
`0
`O
`Abnormal faeces
`(3.1%)
`K
`‘2.
`O
`0
`0
`chapped lips
`I l 0.1%)
`0
`0
`O
`Constipation
`
`
`
`
`0 1. ( 0.1%) .2 { 0.3%)Dry threat 0
`
`
`( 0.5%)
`
`0.1%)
`( 0.1%)
`
`_
`
`
`
`82
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Gastrointestinal disordezs (Cont.)
`Gastritis
`Gastrointestinal pain
`Hiccups
`Loose stools
`salivary hypersscretion
`Sensitivity of teeth
`Stomach discomfort
`Throat irritation
`
`Musculoskéletal and connective tissue
`Muscle tightness
`Neck’pain
`Akthralgia
`Musculoskeletal stiffness
`Myalgia
`‘Pain in jaw
`Muscular weakness
`g Sensatios cf heaviness
`V Back paih
`Limb discomfort
`Muscle rigidity
`.Musculoskeletal discomfort
`‘Pain in extremity
`'
`Arthropathy
`'Chest,wall pain
`jFacia;gpaifi
`'Joint stiffness
`Musculoskaletal and connective tissue (Cont.}
`‘Jointiswelling
`Muscle twitching
`Trigmus
`General diSorders
`‘ Aschenia
`ffgbigue
`'Eeeling hot
`‘Lethargy
`' Feeling abnexmal
`Thirst
`Cold sweat.
`'Faeling cold
`Feeling jittery
`Malaise
`.
`Sensation of pressure
`“Energy increased >
`illnfilvenza like illness
`Qédema,pexiphéral
`. Pain
`Pyrexia
`, Rigazs
`Sensation of foreign body
`sluggishness
`Suprapubic pain
`
`83
`
` A
`
`§.4%§
`
`’82
`
`a.a: v
`
`A.
`
`0.1%)
`0.1%;
`
`1.1%}
`
`0.4%)
`0.1%}
`
`0.3%}
`
`03%;)
`0.1%)
`
`3.1%}
`
`6.1%;
`
`i1.6§§
`0.1%}
`0.7%}
`
`.MA
`
`0.1%}
`
`0.1%}
`
`-O;;%;
`
`0.1%}?
`
`oo<a'o<3wHom
`
`OOCi—‘OONOHOOOi—‘OQHGOE‘BHN
`
`odwva‘oF‘CDF‘Ooc-o00‘6HHoowomcfiooooooou
`OOONHOWOOOOOOVOOOQWU’WKO
`
`( 0.8%}
`
`{ 0.4%)
`
`( 0.1%}
`
`i 0.1%}
`
`{ 0.8%}
`i 9.1%;
`
`1.2%}
`0.1%}'
`8-7%!
`0.1%}
`
`Axflkrp‘MA
`
`{ 0,1%}
`
`{ 0.1%)
`i 0.3%)
`
`AAAA”
`
`*A'AAA’NAA-‘Qrfi
`
`-..~.-.
`
`0.1%:
`45.8%)
`
`0.3%}
`
`3.7%)
`0.4%)
`0.9%;
`0.5%;
`0mm
`0.5%),
`
`.0.l%}
`0.1%)
`
`0.2%5
`
`0.1%?
`
`0.1%}
`
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`o- 1% )1
`0.1%)
`
`Afihm
`
`FtyspxpsaooHH
`
`w wv
`
`f.)
`
`’
`
`PVHPHOHOHOPOHHOO’b-wbmwu
`
`4.?%)
`1.4%)
`1;1%)
`0.7%)
`0.5%)
`6.4%}
`0.4%}
`0.3%)
`0.3%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.11%),
`0.1%)
`9.1%)
`
`,
`
`4.7%}
`
`4.1%}
`1.1%}
`0.9%)
`0.8%}
`O,4%)
`0.3%; m
`O.3%)>
`0.1%};
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`“AWHNWHHHAAA
`
`LA}
`
`wococaOQCOHHHHHNNwaD‘I‘CO
`
`OOaOOOOQOHPHPPMN-Qadmc
`
`

`

`6 l 0.8%)
`1
`l 0.1%)
`5 ( 0.7%)
`2
`l 0.3%)
`0
`
`5 ( 0.7%)
`0
`0
`0
`0
`3 ( 0.4%)
`0
`1 ( 0.1%)
`0
`0
`0
`1
`O
`U
`0
`0
`0
`
`.'
`( 0.1%)
`
`l 0.5%)
`4
`3 ( 0.4%)
`O
`0
`4 l 0.5%)
`0
`G *
`1 ( 0.1%)
`0»
`0 5
`0
`0
`0
`O
`
`.
`
`'
`
`K 0.5%)
`
`4
`0
`1 I 0.1%)
`_ Q'
`o
`.
`0
`l ( 0.1%)
`O
`‘
`*
`1
`( 0.1%)
`0
`1
`0
`Q
`0
`O
`
`( 0.1%)
`
`7 i 1.6%)
`3 i 0.4%)
`2 { 0.3%)
`2 l 0.3%)
`0"
`
`( 0.5%)
`4
`'
`O
`1 ( 0.1%)
`0
`0
`0
`.
`‘
`0
`1 < 0.1%}
`0
`O
`l ( 0.1%)
`1
`( 0.1%)
`O
`O
`0
`0
`0
`
`l 0.5%}
`l 0.1%)
`
`4
`1
`0
`0
`. 4 ( 0.5%)
`0
`'
`2 { 8.3%)
`1 ( 0.3%)
`O
`-
`G
`G
`0
`O
`l
`
`( 0.1%)
`
`7 ( 1.9%)
`0
`1 ( 8.3%)
`0‘
`2 < 0.33)
`0
`“
`I
`3
`i 0.3%}
`1 § 0.1%)
`G
`1 { O.$%)
`G
`G
`0
`O
`1 ( 0.1%)
`
`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT4OO/Trex1ma
`
`
`
`Cardiac disorders
`',Ches€ discomfart
`V Palpitations
`*Chést pain
`Cardiac flutter
`
`.
`

`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`'
`
`’
`
`thoracic and mediastinal
`Respiratory,
`Throat tightness
`Eharyngolaryngeal pain
`Cough
`Nasal passage irritation
`Dyspnoea
`Hoarseness
`-
`.
`, Nasal congestion
`Oropharyngeal swelling
`Postnasal drip .
`. Productive cough =-
`Sinus pain
`'
`Throat irritation
`‘. Nasal oedema
`Rhinorfihoea
`Sneezing
`.Wheezing
`
`-
`
`23 l 3.1%)
`13 I 1.8%}
`8 l 1.1%)
`6 ( 0.8%)
`0
`
`'21 ( 2.8%)
`:0 { 1.4%)
`5 ( 0.7%)
`3 i 0.4%)
`2
`( 0.3%)
`l ( 0.1%)
`1 t 0.1%)
`1 § 0.1%)
`1
`E 0.1%)
`l ( 0.1%)
`1'( 0.1%)
`1
`K 0.1%)
`l ( 0.1%)
`G
`O
`0
`0’
`
`skin and subcutaneous tissue éisorders
`Hyperhidrosis
`Cold sweat
`Mythema
`Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (Cont. )
`Night sweats
`.

`.9ruritus
`Bash
`, Acne
`-,.,
`.
`ComedQne
`"_ PruritqugeneraliSed "
`RaSh papular_
`Skin tightness
`firtiéaria
`
`.
`
`'
`
`$0 ( 1.4%)
`‘ 5-l 0.7%)‘
`l
`( 0.1%}
`1,( 0.1%)
`10.( 1.4%)
`1 i 0.1%}
`l ( 0.1%)
`1 l 0.1%)
`O
`0
`0
`G
`G
`O
`

`
`Infections and infestations
`7
`,Respiratory tract infection viral
`j.Upper reapiratory tract infection
`‘
`. a Bladder infection.
`.‘ gmnchitis
`1 Cystitis acute
`-Inflnenza
`wonsillitis
`.Candiaiasis,.
`aexpes simplex
`Nasoghaxyngitis
`Qral candidiasis
`Otitis media
`‘ Pharyngitis
`‘ Sinusitis
`
`'
`
`9’(.1.2§)
`2 1.0.38);
`Z i 0.3%)"
`1 ( 0.1%)~
`1 i 0.1%) '
`l I 0.1%)
`1
`i 0.1%)
`l
`{ 0.1%)
`0'
`D
`0 H
`0
`6
`'0 *
`G
`
`26 ( 3.5%)
`10 { 1.4%)
`10 { 1.4%)
`6 l 0.8%}
`1
`l 0.1%)
`
`28 ( 3.8%)
`9 l 1.2%}
`6 ( 0.8%}
`1 { 0.1%)
`3 ( 0.4%)
`3 l 0.4%)
`O
`'
`1
`( 0.1%)
`2 i 0.3%)
`0
`0
`2 ( 0.3%)
`2 ( 0.3%)
`l l 0.1%)
`1 l 0.1%)
`1
`l 0.1%)
`2 l 0.3%)
`
`$5 ( 2.0%)
`5 ( 0.7%}
`‘0
`1 f 0.1%)
`15 { 2.0%)
`0_
`:3.) 0.4%)
`- 2,{ 0.3%)
`1 ('0.1%)
`1‘{.0.1%)
`:1‘{ 0.1%)
`1 1 0.1%)
`1 ( 0.1%)
`2 ( 0.3%)
`
`8 ( 1.1%)
`0
`'
`1 { 9.1%)
`G
`1 c 0.1%)
`G
`G
`0'
`6
`0
`O
`1 ( 0.1%)
`. 3 t 0.4%)
`1 ( 0.1%)
`. 1 i 0.3%)
`
`84
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21—926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`GO
`
`3—H»ane?
`
`0.1%)
`
`0.5%}
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`AAA
`
`0.1%)
`
`0.1%)
`
`( 0.1%)
`
`i 0.1%)
`
`QOQHCOOOP‘
`OHOHOOHw
`
`w)»oyéc>mnwV‘B‘WIJC)OId‘hyxo<3c>o<3c>o)4
`
`
`
`
`Hay-iMk3COW000000
`
`i 0.1%)
`'( 0.5%)
`( 0.1%}
`
`( 0.1%}
`( 0.1%)
`l 0.1%)
`{ 3,l%)
`
`( 0.1%L
`
`{ 0.1%)
`
`i 0.1%}
`i 0.1%)
`
`< 0.1%).
`
`( O,1%l
`( 0.1%)
`
`l 0.1%)
`
`( G‘l%)
`
`0.3%l
`
`479
`
`axe
`
`-w
`
`‘3GO0 a $.- w
`
`CQGPOOOHN
`9OiaocH»»a
`
`
`
`HoooooapDOOOO0,000
`
`00000
`
`wta
`
`
`
`
`
`QQQacoocwowwbu
`
`0.4%}
`
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%}
`0.1%}
`
`1.9%;
`0.4%)
`1.2%}
`
`oo ,. 9:466‘m
`
`0.3%}
`
`0.1%}
`0.1%)
`
`0.3%)
`
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`0.3%}
`
`0.3%)
`0.1%)
`
`0.1%}
`0.1%)
`
`0.1%}
`
`3.1%)
`
`0.1%)
`
`0.13;)
`0.1%)
`
`( l l
`
`HHI—‘HOOOOW
`OOPHOKDWQ:
`
`
`
`wwoowawwaocomPchocoaN
`
`Mt»
`
`000$
`
`hi9
`
`«A
`
`(30 0.
`
`wait? we
`
`-PIA
`
`8.4%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1% »
`
`.mfihn.
`
`hahwww
`
`GO
`
`O0OQOO
`
`Psychiatric disorders
`. Anxiety
`Irritability
`Depressed mcod
`Hyperventilation
`Nervousness
`Affect labiiity
`Bisorientation
`Euphoric mood
`Vascular disoréers
`Flushing
`Hot flush
`Hypertension
`Peripheral coidness
`Epistaxis
`Hypotension
`Labile blood pressure
`
`Metabolism and nutrition disorders
`- Thirst
`Anorexia‘
`Dehydraticn
`Fluid retention
`Polydipsia
`Alcohol intolerance
`Decreased appetite
`Sncreased-agpetite
`Eye disorders
`Abnormal sensation in eye
`Asthenopia
`Visual disturbance
`Eye disoréer
`Eye pain
`Eya pruxitus
`Lacrimation increased
`
`‘
`Investigations
`Body temperature decreased
`Fundoscopy abnormal
`fleart rate increased
`I Blond pressure increased ‘
`
`,Blood and lymphatic system diserders
`Lymphadenopathy
`
`Eat and labyrinth disorders
`.Ear discomfort
`Tinnitus 1
`-
`Cexumen impaction
`Ear pain
`’
`Sensation of black in ear
`
`Renal and urinary disoréezs
`Mictuxition urgency
`Nephxolitbiasis
`Renal ané urinary disardezs (Cont 3
`Qallakiuria *
`.
`
`Reproductive system and. breast disorders
`Breast pain 3
`- Election increased
`
`Injury, poisoning, procedural ccmplications
`Animal scratch
`Cantusion
`Joint sprain
`
`Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
`Ectopi6»pregnancy
`
`1.1%)
`0.4%)
`0.3%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`.9%)
`0.5%;
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`ARHAR».
`
`”Av-«AA
`
`OOOHHO—‘Nww
`COOHHD—‘bd
`
`0.8%)
`0.3%)
`0.1%)
`~0.1%)
`0.1%)»
`
`Nhflhr‘m 0.1%)
`
`0.4%)
`0.3%)
`0.1%3
`.1%)
`
`”AAA,
`
`9.4%}.
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`0.1%)
`
`000OD .~www(400'@9693?
`#96?
`
`u.v
`
`wwwMIV
`
`MW"
`
`( 0.1%)
`l 0.1%}
`
`{ 0.1%}
`
`
`
`
`
`c>o<>wxww¢NreQi‘k‘flldGiacdabdk'wldC’°‘°f‘*‘”"“’¢
`
`
`
`ow»OHOHH
`
`0000
`
`CO
`
`85
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`7.1.7 Laboratory Findings
`
`7.1.7.1 Overview of laboratory testing in the development program
`
`Laboratory testing was carried out for subjects in the controlled trials, but these were essentially
`all single dose studies, such that drug exposure was very low, and it would be unlikely for most .
`drug effects to be detected.
`
`The open-label study Of Trexima did not have a comparator group, greatly limiting power to
`identify anything but very rare events.
`
`For all studies, laboratory testing was conducted at times remote from Trexima dosing (baseline
`and follow-up visits), increasing the difficulty of associating changes to drug effects.
`
`7.1.7.2 Selection of studies and analyses for drug—control comparisons of laboratory
`values
`
`All studies submitted were used for analysis of laboratory values.
`
`7.1.7.3 Standard analyses and explorations of laboratory data
`
`Primary Safefl Population
`
`Table 57 lists selected markedly abnormal laboratory values in study 301 and 302 (Table 58
`shows cutoffs for defining values as markedly abnormal). There was no increase in abnormal
`values for Trexima versus the three other study arms.
`
`I reviewed the individual hematology data for the subjects with markedly abnormal values and
`believe that none were serious.
`
`Blood chemistry showed one Trexima-treated patient with hyperkalemia (baseline 5.4 mEq/L,
`increased to 6.6, then 1 day later decreased to 5.4) a known adverse effect of NSAIDS.
`
`Modest elevations in certain enzymes (e.g. CPK, AST) were seen in a small number of subjects
`in all groups, but without apparent relationship to pre- or post—dosing, or treatment arm.
`
`86
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 57: Selected Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Abnormalities,vPrimary Safety Population
`
`U TredhhefifGroups;
`
`i
`
`'
`
`‘i’lacebo
`Ntm 752'(£55:
`
`Sumatrlptan V
`'Trexima
`»N"”'”737 N735 ,
`
`V
`
`, i’ématology
`
`Any ‘
`\ Abnormanty‘
`‘H<=,;::'no‘g‘10mm2
`Platelet Count”
`
`
`
`mbe: of subjeetswithat16
`Lmb/t‘tl ofsubjectswith atle
`
`87
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21—926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 58: Cutoff Definition of Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values
`
`,
`{Table 1,412.20, MT400-303 final) ,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MT400-303, Open Label Safefl Study
`
`This study included the collection of clinical laboratory test data at the time of the screening
`visit, at the 6 month visit, and at the 12 month visit. Routine hematology and
`chemistry tests were performed.
`
`Z Z Z .2 / Alzdé/Jarfocwedon 172652521135" green/falle/m’e/zcy
`
`' Pozen reports, and I agree, that:
`“There was no evidence of a relationship between episodic treatment with Trexima over
`the period of this study and the results of any specific clinical laboratory tests.”
`
`“Because of the possible effects of NSAIDs on hepatic and renal function, hepatic
`enzymes (ALT and AST) and renal function parameters (creatinine and BUN) were
`examined specifically and no suggestion of a safety signal was present.”
`
`88
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`1421-926
`MT400fI‘rexima
`
`Z l. 7.]. 2 14/74/1256,)"floured0/2 pal/1'6” alryéfiyfmm 170/7724/10 dé/mmm/
`
`Little change occurred for most of the hematology and blood chemistry values in the long term
`study. For MCHC (mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration)(Table 1), 23% of subjects
`shifted from ‘high or normal to low.’ However, MCHC was a highly volatile measure, with
`12% of subjects showing ‘change to normal,’ while other hematology values showed 2-4% shift
`to normal. Also, decreased MCHC was not accompanied by other laboratory signs of anemia,
`suggesting it is not indicative of a true adverse effect.
`
`Table 59: Hematology shift values, MT400-303
`
`
`
`
`Low or Normal w) Sign
`H
`_
`
`\High or Normal —> Low: :,;§
`
`iNo Change
`'
`-
`
`
`vatvv‘ ‘«5
`
`
`{Change to Norml
`v
`’
`.1331
`
` dNe Change
`
`
`
`’ Nomagl —> Low '
`
`
`Law OrNorm
`H1 ( (1%),
`
`
`
`flange to Nor H.
`
`‘03: Normal 45'
`£3
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`
`
`No Change
`,«to Normal
`
`
`
`
`89
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21—926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`7. /. Z3. 3 fl/m‘l’ed01/1/1911)" 4174’d/QflOZ/llflr laéora/aly dé/zorma/z'lz'es
`There were two subjects with increased liver enzymes likely'due to Trexima (see section 7.1.3,
`Dropouts and Other Significant Averse Events). Otherwise, only a small number of marked
`laboratory value outliers were identified, and no patterns of abnormalities were found.
`
`7.1.7.4 Additional analyses and explorations
`
`None
`
`None
`
`7.1.7.5 Special assessments
`
`7.1.8 Vital Signs
`
`7.1.8.1 Overview of Vital signs testing in the development program
`
`Both sumatriptan and naproxen are known to increase blood pressure, but insufficient blood
`pressure data was collected in the Trexima studies. Clinical pharmacology studies did not record
`vital signs during medication administration. The controlled trials measured blood pressure only
`days before, or days after single doses. The safety study measured blood pressure only at
`baseline.
`
`7.1.8.2 Selection of studies and analyses for overall drug-control comparisons
`
`(see 7.1.8.1)
`
`7.1.8.3 Standard analyses and explorations of vital signs data
`
`7. /. 0°. 33 / 1120445195flawed0/2 mean/res ofcem‘ra/[glide/26129;
`
`Table 60 lists Vital signs change from the single-dose studies 301 and 302. Vital signs
`differences were calculated between screening and follow-up visits, distant from drug dosing.
`Vital sings, including blood pressure, showed no meaningful change.
`
`90
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 60: Vital Signs Change, Studies 301 and 302
`
`2mm, Inc.
`
`Table 2.?.1;.‘}f.-1'4-.3
`.
`Vital Signs (mange from Scseeninq to Fellow—up
`Safety yopulati-oe from .Sfiudi‘es 3&1 and .362
`
`Study Number made-433.
`
`MW”
`‘E‘rexima
`Sumatriphan
`Napxoxen
`Piecebo
`(NP—737}
`{@3735}
`$115732}
`(NsJSE),
`
`
`Heart Rate (Beats per fiinute) :
`N
`V
`'Mean {std}
`Median
`Min - Max
`Bloodli’ressuxe {Systolic mmflgt:
`141
`.
`tstCIE'
`Meat)
`medfian
`Min - Mei-z
`Blood Sressuize {Didétokie mfigfil:
`741
`717
`252::
`:28
`n
`«3.2 f 3.5}
`“.03 t 8.2)
`111.0
`‘O.Q ( 8.3)
`Mean {sizd}
`{3,711
`0.0
`{3.0.
`0.0
`Median
`43d - 32.13,
`aza — 35.13;
`—30-'-- 32.0
`—26V _ 30.9
`‘Min 514;»:
`
`
`‘
`719
`2.0 (918)
`2 .(3
`~48 - 41.6
`..
`717
`(11,0)
`,-€5.2
`0,9
`v34 6 32.3
`
`.
`3140
`2.3 { 949)
`1:0
`-38 _- 38.0
`
`WEI
`0.2 (211.8).
`{5.0
`~38 r 36.!)
`
`.
`723
`(3.5}
`2.3 f
`2 . 0
`-24 -,- 40.{)
`
`,
`728
`DJ} {ll 3}
`0.0
`~38"¢ 55.0
`
`-
`
`V
`?2'4
`3:53 ($.63
`2.0
`‘
`—36 :- 4£LG
`_
`.
`T324
`011 (2.2.1?
`0,0
`_
`«38‘ ~ 46.6
`
`( 8,5}
`
`Z l. 6’. 3. 2 14/744473;foamed0/2 out/[em or Jéfirflom 120mm]10 aélzor/im/
`
`No patients on Trexima in the single dose trials MT400-301 and MT400—302 (combined N=737)
`experienced the adverse event of ‘blood pressure increased’ as determined by blood pressure
`measurement at follow-up visit.
`
`7. 1 cf 3’. 3 Mrka/owl/1191’s aflddmpou/Jfar VIM/51g}; aé/zor/Im/zlzley
`
`None
`
`None
`
`7.1.8.4 Additional analyses and explorations
`
`7.1.9 Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
`
`7.1.9.1 Overview of ECG testing in the development program, including brief review of
`preclinical results
`
`No ECG testing was conducted at the time of Trexima exposure in any study. Controlled trials
`and the safety trial examined ECGs only at baseline.
`
`91
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`7.1.9.2 Selection of studies and analyses for overall drug-control comparisons
`
`No data available (see Section 7.1 .91)
`
`7.1.9.3 Standard analyses and explorations of ECG data
`
`No data available (see Section 7.1.9.1)
`
`7. /. ,0. f. / 1412052165flea/Jed0/7 measures g’ce/z/ra/te/m’e/zcy
`
`Not data available (see Section 7.1.9.1)
`
`Z Z ,0. J”. 2 Afldé/JeJ/oczuedwz owl/129m or Jflflyfloflz normalto 45/20/7720/
`
`No data available (see Section 7.1.9.1)
`
`Z l. 2 53 3 Jig/”fedout/fem 41752799015024.5721” ECG aé/mr/Im/M'ey
`
`No data available (see Section 7.1.9.1)
`
`7.1.9.4 Additional analyses and explorations
`
`No data available (see Section 7.1.9.1)
`
`7.1.10 Immunogenicity
`
`The components of Trexima are not considered immunogenic.
`
`7.1.11 Human Carcinogenicity
`
`No carcinogenicity studies were conducted with the combination of sumatriptan and naproxen.
`
`Neither sumatriptan alone, nor naproxen alone, were found to be carcinogenic after lifetime, oral
`administration studies in rodents (from prescribing information for Imitrex and Naprosyn).
`
`7.1.12 Special Safety Studies
`
`None
`
`7.1.13 Withdrawal Phenomena and/0r Abuse Potential
`
`While triptans and NSAIDs are not subject to abuse in the classic sense, migraine headache
`medication is frequently overused. Overuse is defined by the IHS as intake more than 15 times a
`
`92
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`month for a minimum of three months. Frequent use of sumatriptan or naproxen can cause
`‘medication overuse headache (MOH).’ MOH his treated by medication withdrawal.
`Withdrawal of headache medication itself often causes a ‘withdrawal headache’ lasting about 5-
`10 days.
`
`The Imitrex label states: “One clinical study with IMITREX (sumatriptan succinate) Injection
`enrolling 12 patients with a history of substance abuse failed to induce subjective behavior
`and/or physiologic response ordinarily associated with drugs that have an established potential
`for abuse.”
`
`7.1.14 Human Reproduction and Pregnancy Data
`
`Sumatriptan:
`Pregnancy category C
`No evidence suggests that sumatriptan increases human fetal abnormalities. Weak and
`contradictory data suggests that sumatriptan might increase the rate of preterm delivery
`(reviewed in TERIS, The Teratogen Information System).
`
`.
`Distribution in breast milk (from Martindale)
`“The distribution of sumatriptan into breast milk following a 6-mg subcutaneous dose has been
`studied in 5 lactating mothers. The mean total recovery of sumatriptan in breast milk was
`estimated to be 14.4 micrograms or 0.24% of the dose. It was calculated that on a weight
`adjusted basis an infant could receive a maximum of 3.5% of the maternal dose.”
`
`.
`Naproxen:
`Pregnancy category C
`The risk of congenital anomalies from naproxen is not likely to be great. Persistent pulmonary
`hypertension and premature closure of the ductus arteriosus have been reported in infants whose
`mothers took naproxen just before delivery (from TERIS).'
`
`Distribution in breast milk (from Martindale)
`“In a study of a breast-fed infant only 0.26% of the mother's dose was recovered from the infant
`
`7.1.15 Assessment of Effect on Growth
`
`Sumatriptan:
`Safety and effectiveness of sumatriptan in pediatric patients has not been established.
`Sumatriptan increases the release of growth hormone
`
`Naproxen:
`Experience injuvenile arthritis and other use experience have established that single doses of 2.5
`to 5 mg/kg, with total daily dose not exceeding 15 mg/kg/day, are well tolerated in pediatric
`patients over 2 years of age (from prescription naproxen label).
`
`93
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`7.1.16 Overdose Experience
`
`No cases of Trexima overdose are reported. Overdose experience with the individual drugs, as
`reflected in labeling, is presented below.
`
`Sumatriptan overdosage:
`“Patients (n=670) have received single oral doses of 140 to 300 mg without significant adverse
`effects. Volunteers (n=174) have received single oral doses of 140 to 400 mg without serious
`adverse events.”
`
`“It is unknown what effect hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis has on the serum concentrations of
`sumatriptan.”
`
`Naproxen overdosage:
`“Significant naproxen overdosage may be characterized by lethargy, dizziness, drowsiness,
`epigastric pain, abdominal discomfort, heartburn, indigestion, nausea, transient alterations in
`liver function, hypoprothrombinemia, renal dysfunction, metabolic acidosis, apnea,
`disorientation or vomiting. Gastrointestinal bleeding can occur. Hypertension, acute renal
`failure, respiratory depression, and coma may occur, but are rare. Anaphylactoid reactions have
`been reported with therapeutic ingestion of NSAIDs, and may occur following an overdose.
`Because naproxen sodium may be rapidly absorbed, high and early blood levels should be
`anticipated. A few patients have experienced convulsions, but it is not clear whether or not these
`were drug—related. It is not known what dose of the drug would be life threatening.”
`
`“Patients should be managed by symptomatic and supportive care following a NSAID overdose.
`There are no specific antidotes. Hemodialysis does not decrease the plasma concentration of
`naproxen because of the high degree of its protein binding. Emesis and/or activated charcoal (60
`to 100 g in adults, I to 2 g/kg in children) and/or osmotic cathartic may be indicated in patients
`seen within 4 hours of ingestion with symptoms or following a large overdose. Forced diuresis,
`alkalinization of urine or hemoperfusion may not be useful due to high protein binding.”
`
`7.1.17 Postmarketing Experience
`
`Trexima is not marketed in any other country. No other combination of triptan/NSAID is
`marketed.
`'
`
`Extensive postmarketing experience exists for both sumatriptan and naproxen.
`
`Naproxen:
`Major recognized adverse effects of NSAIDs, including naproxen, are listed in Table 61.
`
`94
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Ronald Farkas, MD, PhD
`N21-926
`MT400/Trexima
`
`Table 61
`
`: Major adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
`Serious side effects include:
`
`-heart attack
`
`~stroke
`
`°high blood pressure
`-heart failure from body swelling (fluid retention)
`
`~kidney problems including kidney failure
`'bleeding and ulcers in the stomach and intestine
`-low

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket