throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`2 1 -729
`
`APPROVABLE LETTER
`
`

`

`b“ sum“
`
`
`
`S/é DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH&HUMAN SERVICES PublicHealthService
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`NDA 21—729
`
`Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Inc.
`
`Attention: Kusuma Mallikaarjun, PhD.
`2440 Research Boulevard
`
`Rockville, MD 20850
`
`Dear Dr. Mallikaarjun:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) dated and received December 22, 2003, submitted
`under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Abilify (aripiprazole) Orally
`Disintegrating Tablets.
`-
`,
`
`We acknowledge receipt of your submissions of January 13, March 31, July 8, August 4, and August
`20, 2004.
`-
`
`We completed our review of this application, as submitted, with draft labeling, and it is approvable.
`Before the application may be approved, however, it will be necessary for you to address the following
`issues.
`
`1. Please provide compatibility data for aspartame with the active and other excipients in the drug
`product formulation, such as xylitol, to demonstrate that aspartame does not interact.
`
`2. You stated that croscarmellose sodium is to be used ‘——-—————
`
`crospovidone. However, no rationale is provided for use of croscannellose sodium as a —
`-————
`In addition, based on the Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients,
`croscarrnellose sodium can show incompatibilities and requires special storage conditions. Please
`provide data to show its compatibility with the active and other excipients.
`'
`
`3. You have proposed using the — tablet press for the manufacture of commercial batches,
`however, you have provided no batch data derived from this tablet press. Please provide batch data
`using the — tablet press for one batch of each strength of Abilify CDT.
`
`4. Please explain the testing results from the tablet compression of batch #2H56081 (10 mg) and
`batch #2G58279 (30 mg) where approximately _— respectively, of — batches
`were rejectedW Provide the sampling plans used for
`testing batches
`for
`tablet weight, potency,
`tablet hardness and disintegration during the
`compression process.
`
`5. The specification that you have provided for the identification of aripiprazole in the drug product is
`“confirmed” for both the IR and HPLC test methods. This is not an acceptable specification as it is
`

`
`e
`E..a<
`5v4’y1,
`
`E‘
`
`

`

`NDA 21—729
`
`Page 2
`
`vague and inconclusive. Please provide a more suitable specification for the identification of the
`drug product. You indicated that the — method for identification would not be part of the
`-"—-——— .
`Identification tests should be specific for a drug substance (e.g.,1 —,
`Identification solely by a single -—-——— is not regarded as~being specific.
`Provide an acceptable specification limit for the --
`method or a second identification test for
`aripipraZole in the drug product (e.g.,M
`
`M -
`
`———-— Refer» to ICH Guidance Q6A Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance
`Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products.
`
`Please
`is unacceptable.
`6. Your proposed disintegration time specification of NMT —.
`propose an' updated disintegration time limit
`in the drug product specifications (refer to the
`Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science, October 21— 22, 2003).
`
`In addition, the disintegration method statesw
`
`the
`
`w —
`
`——_—— Please provide updated criteria for
`disintegration method and updated drug product release specifications.
`
`7. The following pertain to the stability of the Aripiprazole ODT:
`
`a. The stability data provided for Abilify ODT batches (manufactured and packaged at Mayaguez,
`Puerto Rico) constitutes supportive stability data. Due to the possible softening and
`increased friability of the CDT, you will need to demonstrate that these tablets can be shipped
`in bulk containers and packaged at
`the proposed commercial sites in ‘ ‘1
`— Provide information on bulk containers shipping conditions and release data for
`the bulk batch at the packaging sites Provide stability data from commercial packaging sites to
`demonstrate comparability with the stability data collected from Mayaguez Puerto Rico.
`
`b. You have identified an unknown impurity at — under accelerated conditions. Have you
`identified and characterized this unknown impurity at —
`
`c. Please provide specification limits for each test method in the long—tenn stability protocol as
`well as the post-approval stability prot0col.
`In addition, the post-approval stability protocol
`should monitor for water, hardness and friability.
`
`8. Refer to your labeling for the following comments:
`
`a. Please provide labels for bulk containers for'packaging and shipping and updated labels
`(containing trade name) for unit dose blisters and their cartons.
`
`b. The correct molecular weight for aripiprazole as per the USP Dictionary is 448.39. Please
`correct the molecular weight for aripiprazole in the Description section of the package insert.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-729
`
`Page 3
`
`9. During a recent inspection of the Bristol Myers Squibb drug product manufacturing and release
`testing facility for this application, located at Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (CFN # 2627673), our field
`investigator conveyed deficiencies to the facility representatives. Satisfactory resolution of these
`deficiencies is required, and this site will need to be found acceptable by the F DA's Office of
`Compliance, before this application may be approved.
`
`\
`
`10. We request that you adopt the following dissolution method and specification:
`
`V Apparatus: USP Apparatus II (Paddle)
`Speed: 75 rpm
`Media: pH 4 Acetate Buffer
`Volume: 1000 mL
`
`Specification: Q NLT -— in 30 minutes
`
`11. We are granting your request for a waiver of in vivo bioequivalence studies for the 10 mg, 15 mg
`and 20 mg tablet strengths.
`
`12. We have no objections to the use of the proprietary name, Abilify Discmelt.
`
`All applications for new active ingredients, new dosage forms, new indications, new routes of
`administration, and new dosing regimens are required to contain an assessment of the safety and
`effectiveness of the product in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived or deferred. We
`note that you have not fulfilled the requirement. We are waiving the requirement for pediatric studies
`for this application.
`
`In addition, you must submit final printed labeling (FPL) for the drug. The labeling ‘should be identical
`in content to the attached package insert.
`
`'
`
`Please submit the final printed labeling (FPL) electronically according to the guidance for industry
`titled Providing Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format — NDA (January 1999). Alternatively,
`you may submit 20 paper copies of the FPL as soon as it is available but no more than 30 days after it
`is printed. Please individually mount ten of the copies on'heavyweight paper or similar material.
`
`If additional information relating to the safety or effectiveness of this drug becomes available, revision
`of the labeling may be required.
`
`In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for
`this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock—up form, not final print. Send one copy to
`this division and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert(s) directly to:
`
`Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD—42
`Food and Drug Administration
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, MD 20857
`
`Within 10 days after the date of this letter, you are required to amend this application, notify us of your
`intent to file an amendment, or follow one of your other options under 21 CFR 314.] 10. If you do not
`follow one of these options, we will consider your lack of response a request to withdraw the
`
`

`

`NDA 21-729
`
`Page 4
`
`application under 21 CFR 314.65. Any amendment should respond to all the deficiencies listed. We
`will not process a partial reply as a major amendment nor will the review clock be reactivated until all
`deficiencies have been addressed.
`
`The drug product may not be legally marketed until you have been notified in writing that
`application is approved.
`
`the
`
`If you have any questions, call Steven D. Hardeman, R.Ph., Senior Regulatory Project Manager, at
`(301) 594—5525.
`
`Sincerely,
`,
`‘
`.-
`“SCH.
`
`,
`
`i
`.
`.
`,.
`,
`1
`, r; ~<
`,
`I”
`., H
`:7.
`-, m,
`:11'1’1. é.(hu’é..:\.(. sun’nk’ .\1_£:!.7(,1!(s!i. Hafiz,
`
`Russell Katz, MD.
`Director
`
`Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation 1
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`

`

`3?
`
`Page(s) Withheld
`
`Trade Secret / Confidential
`
`/ Draft Labeling
`
`Deliberative Process
`
`Withheld Track Number: Approvable Letter #_/
`
`/
`
`I
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`RusSell Katz
`10/22/04 10:52:28 AM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket