throbber
Results:
`
`0
`
`0 No mortality, no signs, ophthalmic effects, body weight effects, serum chemistry, urine
`.
`chemistry, macroscopic or microscopic effects
`‘
`o PTH decreased at 2h post dose beginning after first dose in all groups. PTH levels reduced
`in HDm and in MDf, HDf on Day28.
`Serum ionized calcium slightly reduced (17%) in MD, HD, on Day 27, at 2-4h post dose
`up to 8b post dose.
`No effects on serum or urine bone markers (resorption or formation)
`Increase in cortical bone area, decrease in trabecular bone area of femur inMDf and HDf
`Increase in total metaphyseal BMD offemur in HDf
`Increase in kidney weight in HDm
`Decrease in platelet count in HDf after recovery
`AUC parent: 21, 72,220 ngxh/mL in LD, MD, HD (Day 1). AUC decreased after 27 days
`
`Conclusion:
`
`'
`
`-
`
`Potential changes in bone resorption/formation resulting in relative increase in cortical bone
`and increase in BMD at low AUC levels (100-200 ngxh/mL). This may be related to decrease
`in PTH and reduced bone resorption. Suppressed bone resorption in young animals may lead
`to grth effects or effects on bone marrow and hematopoiesis.
`
`28-day oral toxicity study in juvenile dogs with a 28-day recovefl period (Study Nr. 1019381
`Methods:
`
`Juvenile dogs (10 weeks, N=7/s/g) were dosed by oral gavage at 0, 0.5, 1.5, 5 mg/kg/day for
`28 days, or for 28 days-+ 28 days recovery. The HD of S'mkd was the NOAEL in the 28-day
`adult dog study. Plasma concentrations, ionized Ca, and PTH, and bone biomarkers (serum,
`urine) were measured. Femur was analyzed by pQCT.
`‘
`
`Results:
`
`_
`
`.
`
`0 No mortality, no signs, ophthalmic effects, body weight effects
`0 No effects on hematology, coagulation, urinalysis, urine chemistry, organ weights,
`macroscopic findings
`0 ‘No effects on bone markers or pQCT parameters (BMC, BMD, area)
`Slight increase in serum P in HDm on ,D27, slight decrease in ionized calcium in MD, HD
`on DO, D27. No clear effects on PTH
`)
`0 Heart (post recovery): lefi ventricular arterial hypertrophy, in all groups including control
`but with increased incidence and severity in MDm, HDm,f. Multifocal left ventricular ‘
`myocardial fibrosis with minimal arterial hypertrophy in 1/7 HDm
`0 . AUC parent: dose-dependent exposure in all dose groups. AUC decreased on D27 as
`compared to D1 (autoinduction?) AUC values 4.5, 15.8, 62 ngxh/mL in LD, MD, HD. No
`sex difference.
`
`Tabte 8. Summary 01 Cardiac Flndlngs in the 28-Day Juvenile 009 Study at the
`
`48
`
`Left Ventricular
`Arterial Hypertrophy
`Minimal
`Slight
`Moderate
`
`

`

`RAT AND MONKEY TOXICITY STUDIES OF 23-MONTH DURATION '
`
`A 26-WEEK ORAL GAVAGE TOXICITY STUDY OF AMG 099073-01 IN THE ALBINO RAT WITH A
`
`'
`
`.
`4-WEEK RECOVERY
`Project No. 88583; Sponsor Study Nr. 100082
`Conducting laboratory:m
`Study period: March — October 1998
`GLP compliance: Y
`QA report included
`
`.Purity: 99.7%
`Lot Nr. 709001 ,
`_
`Assay of test compound (in vehicle-prepared dosing solution): HPLC
`Vehicle/control: 0.5% methylcellulose in distilled water (batch nr. 126H1424)
`
`METHODS
`
`'
`
`Spraguc-Dawley CD (Crl:CDR(SD)BR) rats (Rattus norvegicus) (20 or lS/sex/dose group, 15 for experiment, 5
`for recovery), age at start 6 weeks, body weight 130-220 gram, were dosed orally, by gavage, with 0, 5, 25, 100
`mg/kg/day, for 26 weeks (10 ml/kg/day). Additionally, 6/sex/grp were dosed for TK and ionized Ca evaluation.
`Feeding was ad libitum. pQCT scans of right distal femur (metaphysis, diaphysis) performed ex vivo in Wks 26,
`31. Histopathology at sacrifice (see Appendix I). Toxicokinetics on Day 1, Wks 13, 26, 31: predose, 0.5, l, 2, 4,
`8, 12, 24h postdose. Samples used for assay of drug assay (LC-MS/MS) and ionized Ca determination.
`'
`8
`
`.
`
`da_:
`
`N/sex ' K, Ca
`
`N/sex/_ro n mam stud
`N/scx termmalsacrlfioe
`
`RESULTS
`
`. Mortality — None
`Signs — MainfSal‘iyvation and abnormal respiratory sounds in MD and HD
`
`Body weight - A
`
`males
`
`15'
`
`Da 210
`
`'ecove
`
`’m
`
`“4
`
`.
`
`23
`
`428
`
`,
`
`-—
`——
`387 (9l%)
`263
`
`l00% %
`
`67%
`
`49
`
`

`

`Food consumption - reduced by 0-5% in MDm, and by 10-20%V(g/anima1) in HDm and HDf throughout
`treatment period; no significant differences in recovery period
`‘
`
`Ocular finding - Cataracts (small,'mu1tifocal opacities in anterior cortex) in almost all Group 4 animals, on Day
`88/87, Day 172/171, and recovery, similar at all times
`
`Hematolo -
`
`_
`
`—.?£II
`
`‘statistically significantly different from control
`
`Clinical Chemis
`
`—--‘ e
`Contr lO
`
`
`
`— -
`
`Wk31'
`
`
`'
`
`M
`
`D .
`
`Wk31
`
`Other finding: glucose decreased slightly but significantly in HD groups, in Wk 13 and Wk 27 in males, in Wk27
`in females
`.
`
`
`
`Serum PTH
`
`0
`
`O Males: Serum PTH decreased from ca. 60-80 pg/mL (predosing) to < 20 pg/ml (wks 1-13) or <40-50 pg/mL
`(wk26) @Zhrs after dosing, in non-dose-related manner.
`I
`Females: Decrease from 40-80 pg/mL (predosing) to Q0 pg/mL (wks 1-4), or <50 pg/mL (wk 13), or <60
`pg/mL (wk 26) @Zhrs post dose, also non-dose—related manner“
`-
`Predose levels were slightly lowered in Wks 4-13 in HD groups, but retumed to control levels in all dose
`groups by Wk 26. Apparently, some adaptation in PTH response occurred.
`'
`
`' 0
`
`Ionized calcium
`
`Ionized Ca mg/dL) (not normalized for H)
`_I-I§--__-I§l_—_
`
`50
`
`

`

`
`
`‘slatistically significantly different from control
`
`a
`0
`0
`
`' Ionized Ca values minimal at ca. 6-!2h post dose.
`24h and pre-dose levels remained lower throughout study in treated groups.
`Ionized Ca values recovered at Wk30.
`
`figure 1. Mean Normalized Ionized Calclum Levels ln Male and Female Rats
`'
`Administered Clnacalcet HCI Over a 24 hr Period at Week 26
`
`~ ~«
`
`~ -
`
`~
`
`m '5" -~ ~~ ,
`§—-----~-—v-«~— —--v
`— - — '“l
`15%
`l
`g + 0mm?
`14
`g
`«v- 5m 4‘
`
`g 153: W i
`»~-——:°m 5
`z—4- mm .
`’
`z
`:3?»
`,
`‘
`-/
`v ‘2
`‘31..
`/\‘r”::- d
`E
`L”
`‘“““‘
`11 Q
`‘\
`‘r’
`/
`Z
`'
`:
`\
`1
`:g m
`Rx ,nw 4......d/
`.
`8 on
`1""
`|‘
`on
`-.
`‘
`g '91
`05—;
`o5
`
`‘
`'
`
`.
`v
`
`>
`
`a
`M iw-.~W—w-_mww._w,w-r .— w.._ .. ..V _
`presses.”
`a
`2
`4
`e
`9'
`r2
`:4
`Timur-lows}
`
`
`
`le.WM...WWW.
`
`' Bone effectsl -—
`
`Increased unbecular BMD distal femur Decreased conical BMD distal femur
`
`Reduced bone len ;
`Increased bone diameter
`
`
`
`51
`
`

`

`Shorter bone (both sexes), trabecular and conical BMD and area/thickness effect in different directions in m and f. Unclear effects on bone.
`
`
`
`
`
`—--In-
`
`
`
`
`__—m-
`Not recovered: (males) liver, lung; gonads, brain; (females) lung, adrenal, brain
`
`_-—-
`m—
`
`-
`
`Gross pathology: stomach, area depressed: m 0-0-0-1; f 0-1-1—3
`
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`Eye, lenticular degeneration (clusters of
`swollen/vacuolated/mptured/liquefied, i.e., abnormal
`
`
`
`fibers in anterior cortex of lens
`» Kidney, mineralization, pelvis diverticulum (clusters
`ofcrystalloid material, free or beneath pelvis
`
`epithelium or in lumen of distal collecting tubules,
`
`sometimes with thickenin_ of - 1vis e-ithelium
`
`Cecum, hyperplasia, mucosa] (increased cellular
`basophilia and mitotic figures, goblet cell loss,
`
`inflammato
`cell increase
`
`—
`
`Heart, degeneration and/or necrosis, myocardial
`
`
`(small collections of mononuclear cells in left

`
`
`
`
`ventricle and ventricular papillary muscle, sometimes
`
`
`
`associated with fibrosis and/or degenerated and/or
`'
`necrotic m ocardial fibers
`
`
`Lun alveolarhistioc sis
`_ _
`_Im_
`Th
`us 1 mu-hoidatroh —
`_nm—
`“_—
`_—
`lncidence out of
`Incidence out of
`
`
`
`
`52
`
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`Im—
`
`—__—_
`
`Lun, histioc tosis
`,
`Th mus,l mhoid atro-h
`
`
`Histo - atholo,
`
`TREATMENT PERIOD
`
`Incidence out of
`15,15,15,15
`
`Incidence out of
`15,15,15,15
`
`-
`
`,
`
`Slight to mild
`
`

`

`0
`
`Eye and kidney findings were not reversed. The lens finding was probably related to hypocalcernia (ref) and
`an irreversible efi‘ect. The kidney finding of mineralization (material in lumen) and associated epithelial
`'changes may have been related to serum calcium and phosphate changes (CaxP product increased) or
`increased urine calcium concentration, more likely the latter since Ca (urine) in m and f correlated to
`microscopic change. It is unclear why this was not reversed.
`‘
`0 Myocardial degeneration and/or necrosis (reversible) finding was interpreted by study pathologist as a
`background change (i.e., spontaneous cardiomyopathy) although dose-related increase in incidence in
`females was recognized. The cause of this finding was unclear, but the incidence suggests it was drug-
`related.
`‘
`'
`‘
`'
`
`0
`
`Cecurn finding of hyperplasia/inflammation was observed only in treated animals and was dose-related in
`females. The effect was reversible. Effect appeared to be drug-related.
`
`Toxicokinetics -
`
`Analysis of parent drug AMG-073 (males and female average)
`
`Day 1
`
`
`
`PlasmaAMG099073(rig/ml)
`
`
`
` Mean
`
`Nd not determined
`
`Na not applicablel
`
`
`‘Rat TK data (males and females searate
`
`53
`
`

`

`
`
`‘ectimated
`
`I
`
`Metabolites were not measured in this study. Metabolite AMGIOZ664 (M7) was measured in the carcinogenicity study. Exposure(AUC,
`ngxh/mL) to M7 was on average 50 times higher than to parent drug.
`
`TK conclusions
`
`~
`
`0
`0
`
`AUC was linear with dose in m and f over dose range of 5-100 mg/kg/day. Cmax was less than proportional. This suggests decreased
`rate of absorption at higher doses
`Cmax, AUC (l) > Cmax, AUC (m) at 100 mkd (Wks 13, 26, but not Day l)~
`Accumulation varied from 2.5—3.5 (AUC Day lBO/AUC Day 1)
`
`Summary and evaluation —
`
`Effects of AMG-073 in a 6-month toxici
`
`stud in albino rats
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_ TREATMENT
`—
`Signs
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`
`'
`
`_— RECOVERY PERIOD
`Im_——
`Abnormal breathing, dehydration, salivation, MD, HD
`Abnormal breathing in HD m
`broken teeth, thin, fur staining, fur wet, fur
`and f
`thin
`
`Body weight
`
`BW and BW gain reduced
`
`—
`,HD“
`
`FC reduced
`
`HD —20%
`
`D
`H -20%
`
`BW gains similar in HD and
`controls
`FC in HD similar as in controls
`
`Ocular effects
`
`Early cataract formation
`(small, multi-focal opacities in anterior
`cortex, similar in Wks 13, 26, 3]
`
`——_
`HD (all)
`HD (all)
`Effect persistent
`
`;
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`
`—
`
`Clinical chem) .
`Wk27
`
`Hematolo
`‘-
`— PTT elevated
`-
`Cincrease neutrohils
`
`PT elevated
`
`a total or ionized decrease
`increase
`K decrease
`reatinine increase
`
`00
`ALT Alk Phos increases
`
`LD, MD“ HD“
`LD“ MD‘, HD‘
`MD, HD‘
`
`LD,MD*,HD‘
`
`—
`
`Albumin decrease (slight), beta and. gamma-
`r
`-lobulin increase sli _ht-moderate
`— Glucose decrease
`’
`"
`Sliht decreases in: Cl, K, increase in Na
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ll
`A .arameters recovered
`
`Recovered in m f
`Recovered in m
`Partial]
`recovered
`
`2.5 3 2
`N
`ecovered in m
`ecovered in m
`
`Recovered in m
`_
`
`_
`
`—
`Normalized in m,f
`Normalized in m, reversed in f
`
`
`
`
`Endocrinolo 3
`
`Serum PTH decrease uredose
`
`LD, MD HD
`
`LD,MD,HD '
`
`Increase in urinary Ca content (up to 3-5x)
`
`LD’, MD“, HD“
`
`MD‘, HD‘
`
`— Decrease in urine Na, K down to 0.5x
`—
`
`Unremarkable
`
`MD, HD“
`
`MD, HD“
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`54
`
`
`
`
`_O
`
`rgan weight
`change .
`
`Absolute organ weight decreases (liver,
`spleen, heart, lungs, kidney, gonads, brain,
`thyroids, adrenals, thymus)
`Relative-to-body organ weight increases
`(liver, lun adrenal, brain
`‘statistically significant effects
`
`.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Human Cmax (175 mg dose) =' V AUC == 648 ng.h/ml (median, Study 20000187, 7-day dosing, renal impaired patients)
`
`NOTE: The multiples of the human plasma levels were calculated on the basis ofparent drug The parent drug
`constitutes <1% of the circulating compound~related material, and the remainder1s metabolites.
`The effect on (ionized) calcium (transient or persistent decrease)IS related to the expected effect of the drug to
`' suppress PTH secretion from the parathyroid. PTH increases tubular reabsorption of calcium in the distal
`convoluted tubule and low levels cause reduced calcium reabsorption with increased urinary levels. An increase
`in calcitonin release from thyroid C—cells may also have contributed to hypocalcemia due to a suppression of
`osteoclastic calcium reso1ption. The effect on phosphorus is probably due to an increase of P reabsorption due to
`low PTH levels, since PTH normally suppresses this reabsorption in the proximal tubule.
`
`The hypocalcemia probably caused the clinical signs of salivation and abnormal breathing through effects on
`CNS or smooth muscle function. Hyperphosphatemia is generally thought to have no significant effects.
`
`The cataracts were probably caused by hypocalcemia as described for rodents
`
`Clotting parameters (PT, APTI) may have been elevated due to decrease in serum calcium and inhibition of
`calcium-dependent clotting factors
`
`Cause and significance of other hematology findings (WBC increase), and clinical chemistry changes (CK
`decrease, ALT and ALP increase, serum protein changes) is unclear
`
`Effects on BUN and creatinine may have been related to kidney mineralization and urinary tract obstruction, or
`dehydration.
`
`The effect on serum glucose (decrease) at the high dose may be related to an inhibition by AMG-O73 of the
`KATP channel (ATP-sensitive potassium channel) in pancreatic beta-cells. This channel is instrumental in the
`‘ stimulation of insulin release from B-cells, and blockers of this channel can cause hypoglycemia.
`
`‘ The urine changes (increased Ca, decreased Na, K) were due to the effect of decreased PTH on tubular calcium
`reabsorption, and possibly direct effects of AMG-O73 on Na and K excretion/reabsorption.
`
`At the HD femoral length was reduced in both sexes, possibly secondary to FC and BW effects. At the MD
`' (females) and at the HD (both sexes), total bone area, cortical bone area and thickness, and endocortical
`circumference were slightly increased1n distal femur metaphysis and mid femur diaphysis. There were no clear
`BMD effects Thus, at 100 mg/kg/day, bone was shorter and had a slightly thicker cortex. Effects were not
`reversed in '4 weeks. The effect on bone (BMD and size) was probably the combined result of the reduction in
`serum PTH, increase in calcitonin, and other potential effects of AMG-073 on bone, including direct effects on
`bone cells
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`.,~ ..
`
`The effect on serum P (increase) is due to increased renal reabsorption.
`
`The changes in absolute and relative organ weight were probably due to decreases in body weight.
`
`The toxicological relevance of the cecum hyperplasia and cardiac findings is unclear.
`
`In conclusion, the main potential target organs for toxicity of AMG—O73 appear to be:
`Eye, kidney, liver, pancreas, bone, heart
`
`Similar results from 3—month rodent dietary toxicig studies
`
`55
`
`

`

`Decreased body weight gain (rat, mouse)
`Serum Ca decrease, P increase (rat, mouse)
`Kidney weight decrease (rat)
`Kidney pelvicdilation (rat, mouse)
`Kidney transitional cell hyperplasia (male rat)
`
`Histoatholo_1nvento
`S . nsor Stud # 100020
`
`
`
`Species: Monkey
`
`Pathology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Organ
`
`wei_ t
`X
`xt
`_—
`_—
`_—
`_—
`_—
`mam—_—
`
`> w
`
`Bone Marrow smear (sternum)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__—
`__—
`\ m——
`
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`l_——
`__—
`M—
`-__—
`__—Liver .
`
`
`
`__—
`__—
`__—
`m———
`__—
`__—
`~ u——
`
`
`
`, __—
`Parath
`id
`_—
`__—
`__-
`MERE—_—
`
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__—
`__-
`S-inalcord
`_—
`__—
`
`__—
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`, _—————
`
`‘ }
`
`
`
`
`
`vawmd
`i' organ weight obtained
`
`_—
`
`
`
`ES_——
`_-—
`———
`——— .
`_——
`—_—
`nu bladder
`_—
`
`
`
`'
`
`57
`
`

`

`THREE-MONTH ORAL TOXICITY STUDY WITH AMG 099073—01 IN CYNOMOLGUS MONKEYS ‘
`WITH A 2-WEEK RECOVERY PERIOD
`Sponsor Study Nr. 100020
`Performing Laboratory:
`Laboratory study identification:
`Study period January-June 1998
`
`GLP and QA statements included, not signed.
`Lot Nr. 709001
`
`
`
`
`Study Nr. 6271-165
`
`Purity: Assumed to be 100%
`Assay of test compound (in vehicle-prepared dosing solution): HPLC
`Vehicle/control: 0.5% methylcellulose1n distilled water.
`METHODS
`stock colony, age at start
`Cynomolgus monkeys (Macacafascicularis) (4 or 6/sex/dose group) from
`3-6 years, body weight range 23-2.7 kg (m), 20-32 kg (1), were dosed orally, by nasal gastric intubation, with
`0, 5, 50, 100, 150/100 (Dayl-15)/(Day 16«end) mg/kg/day, for at least 13 weeks (5 ml/kg/day). Groups 1-4
`received dose once daily. Group _5 was dosed bid with 2x75mg/kg/day on Days 1-15, and dosed bid with
`2x50mg/kgiday from Day 16 through termination. Each dose was flushed with 5 ml tap water. Food consumption
`and feeding schedule were not given. In Group 1 and Group 4, 2 recovery animals were taken off treatment at ca.
`13 weeks, and continued in study for 2 weeks.
`
`
`
`
`
`Observation times:
`
`Clinical signs
`Body weights
`Food consumption
`Ophthalmoscopy
`fl
`Hematology
`Clinical chemistry
`Pl};
`Ionized Ca
`Urinalysis
`Gross pathology b
`Or ans wei
`ed
`Histopathology
`Toxicokinetics
`
`‘
`
`|
`
`RESULTS
`
`Clinical signs
`No deaths
`
`Twice daily
`Day 1, then weekly
`.
`Not recorded
`Predosing, and pn'or to necropsy
`Predosing, and prior to necropsy
`Weeks -2, 5, 8, 12, 15
`Weeks -2, 5, 8, 12, 15
`Day 1, and Weeks 4, 8, 12. Samples predose and 2h postdose
`Assayed in samples for toxicokinetic analysis
`,
`Weeks 2, 5, 8, 12, 15
`,
`At sacrifice (see Histopathology Inventory1n Appendix I)
`Listed1n histopathologyinventory (Appendix I)
`At sacrifice (see Appendix I)
`Day 1 and end of Weeks 4, 12: (A) Groups l-4rprior to dose,,
`0.5,1,2,4,8,12,24h postdose; (B) Group 5: prior to dose, 0.5,l,2,4,6h
`post dose (2x/day). Samples used for assay of drug and ionized Ca.
`
`1
`

`
`On Day 16, HD2 was reduced from 75 mg/kg twice daily to 50 mg/kg twice daily based on emesis, poor
`appetite, soft feces (HDl was given 100 mg/kg daily).
`
`~

`
`~
`
`-' ~~ .
`,
`-
`
`1
`
`~
`
`58‘
`
`

`

`V
`Signs
`-poor to fair appetite in most or all MD,HD,,I-ID2 m,f
`-emesis in 1 to 4 MD,HD.,HD2 m,f
`-soft/liquid feces in 1 to 4 LD, MD, l-II).,HD2 m, and in 1 to 3 MD, HD.,HD2 f
`-excessive salivation (particularly during and post dosing) in 2 to 5 MD,HD1,HDZ m,f
`-all signs reversible
`
`Body weights
`Wk 1-2: Weight loss Or reduced weight gain in HD.;
`Wkl-l3, and Wk 14-16: See Tables
`
`Bu wei tdata
`
`
`
`Weekl3
`
`m 3
`2
`
`
`
`_
`m - -
`_ -
`‘
`
`‘statistically significantly different from control
`
`Bod wei t _ain data
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m
`__-- -
`. m——— l!-
`
`_IZ-m— Ill-
`
`-a-n-—— —
`
`mm— _
`——-
`-
`‘statistically significantly different from control
`
`Food consumption
`' No data
`
`0 hthalmosco
`
`No test article related‘findings
`
`
`EKG
`
`Prolonged QT intervals in HD, m,f and HD2 m,f (probably due to hypocalcemia)
`.rolon ation in Week 13
`_
`
`N/sex
`
`V
`
`incidence of animals with increased QT interval (>20
`msec above upper range of QT interval normal for
`articularHeart Rate
`'
`Interval
`
`
`
`—_— ,
`
`-
`
`I T interval
`
`Dose group
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Oral-2 D __
`W__
`mum—l-
`_—_l-
`“mm—I-
`
`
`___
`Determined: Heart rate, Heart rhythm, P-QRS-T complexes and intervals, Mean electrical axis
`
`Subsequently, Sponsor performed a statistical analysis of QT data and established a correlation between serum
`Ca levels and QTc (rr —0.7)
`‘
`
`
`
`

`

`n:
`
`=w.awC..2n.E6.xx6m..60m.wWH.9WH7558275534.47..D3.Or.”MD23.L.......66”3a.._om.e.m.L6.61w”wmmmM7H60.m.in_$.19...n..2Ss.Em.Wm,..Six.m6.“.JMWM.,.m5.5..0%“mmn3J32309A}...w.maanumnn7n7
`
`.m.wm.K.a.9...B.m(x.4.3w....w?..1.mo...c...Jm.33.5.8.00Iy.Cc.1...J,l984.2.8.9.7.o.C\\Cmm.m6.l3300.]Do
`7..XC.H3U:w.a.Cx.9...».
`.wDu.a.A8cosm
`
`HAB.W12)22;”.H533I.69750..E.Aw1.
`
`.39x2LA...»A,..I74*«I..1..1..a.kA...3.D9.9.”o.7.7..w525.
`A...AAA.,.
`
`wm.7."up
`_..Wr3352:m22Z252828ll1lklklk
`éééééiéiéiééééféééég:LMmmmmmwmwmW286420wmm3.w2.2.222..wwwwww0000000O00m.aGomvohomimmzmNmmmmmmmmm
`
`aammmmmmmmmc...»pp...vkk
`
`a.»f
`
`Hematolo
`
`Hemmolo ; data
`
`Hct
`
`%
`
`
`
`.95291.8.0.7....5992.95.5.6.5.mu”1.8795H60.1.
`
`I.
`90y3.x4400.
`
`9.54:5.
`
`6.57
`
`Mm264
`
`Week 16
`Week 16
`
`ww6kkaaww
`
`Week 1
`
`Week 16
`
`93333
`
`m.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Bosin AB m—
`
`0
`
`3.
`
`‘ statistically significantly different from control
`“ extremely high WBC and Monocyte counts in 1 out of the 4 HD; females
`
`' No changes in MCV, MCH, MCHC, platelet count, reticulocyte count, neutrophil, lymphocyte counts.
`
`Summary Results Hematology (Week 12)
`
`t72743J56597
`
`*8J37
`
`*888.33378
`
`
`
`Week 16
`
`Week
`
`Week 16
`
`Week 16
`
`Week 16
`
`k
`
`l30l207.
`
`29ll2I.3227ll
`
`3.7.
`
`61
`
`“ statistically significantly different from control
`
`Reversibility of hematology effects
`control and HD., 2 animals/- on 2 week recovery):
`
`Clinical'chemis
`
`Serum chemi
`
`- data
`
`nkww
`
`35
`
`w—
`eek 12
`
`—W
`
`— W
`
`eek 8
`
`Week 12
`
`mmimmmmmmmmmmek
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`7,.“
`
`.
`
`rn-r.‘
`
`.mvye):
`
`..
`
`
`
`No significant effects on: urea, ALK P, creatinine, total protein, total bilirubin, GGT, serum
`' electrolytes, glucose.
`,
`.
`.
`Reversibility: All parameters affected were reversed, except cholesterol which was still lower
`after 2 w‘eeks‘rec‘o'very.
`
`ewnwwamm-Mu-m
`‘
`
`-~—}
`l
`[
`i.'::'::_\_:;° :39Ln):
`“ N“ " “ 3
`
`/’/”¢k\‘x‘
`,e- ’
`
`"
`
`'
`‘
`SerumPTH
`- No conclusive data obtained (serum levels below LLQ)
`
`mum
`Decrease in serum ionized Ca:
`LD (m,f) groups:
`Day I: from 2-4h to 8-12h postdosing
`Week 4: fiom 0.5-2h to 8-12h postdosing
`Week 12: from 2-4h to 8h postdosing
`MD,HD (m,f) groups:
`Day 1: from 2h to 24h postdosing
`Week 4: at all time points (pre and postdosing)
`Week 12: at all time points (pre and postdosing)
`
`i
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`
`
`(- ‘ ,_‘
`
`?
`-
`~._
`A
`.<> 1 o
`5 A
`
`.
`
`-
`r}
`
`“‘“~— w s “4
`--.--._-___
`-
`m g
`
`. " 55"? 0w '9' ;“""““""'““""” “:3
`”m l
`m... nwumm
`
`Soup Mean mated mum Levers - Week 12 ' Females
`
`'
`
`
`
`-4
`
`_
`
`'
`
`j "f““r-N......g,
`
`- . _ - - _‘ .-
`
`4;.
`
`rt-
`u.— .s.. .i _ ,_
`
`‘
`
`31:: gm l
`i ‘ A 5° ”9‘9
`'v- 100mg
`2
`
`J
`_*__l_.,.‘2,__,‘f;i?_"i53l§
`WW NMHQWW
`
`Serum pH:
`Increase in serum pH in MD,HD (In only) groups:
`Day ,1: at 4h postdosing
`Weeks 4, 12: no effects
`
`,
`,
`V
`Urinalysis
`No treatment related findings
`
`Gross pathology
`
`
`
`62
`
`MOO318l$$0d1838
`
`

`

`msEL
`
`2
`
`Ilv
`
`)v)*Td)(*h.anTI»(
`
`.1AD00((..TiTT
`
`)
`
`1.ew.wcemmmmmmca.makmmm.mmmmmmmmmmwk«cm«mmwkmm-000mmpmummmmmmmmu
`
`S
`
`H,Wnmw10.2c.m2
`
`63
`
`”my”...
`
`»n»s.«« ‘-,- -a
`
`Organ weight (Organ list: see Appendix)
`
`
`
` )In,llT(((
`
`“I
`
`IvilT
`
`-I
`
`E-
`I-
`
`—-- l
`
`(l)
`
`_ I
`
`III
`—
`
`- l
`
`flfll
`
`i (l)
`
`— I
`
`III
`
`-i
`
`n)
`
`))\IGOmGlIvTl
`
`.9
`
`ficant changes
`
`h,D(LIv
`
`Kidney
`
`Thymus
`
`Testis
`
`prdidymis
`
`Liver/gallbladde
`
`Spleen
`
`Thyroid/parathy
`roid
`ly s:w
`*Bolded arrows represent statisu
`related
`dose-
`DR7
`' Odd result (pituitary)
`
`Histopathologx (Organ list: see Appendix)
`
`Histoatholo; data
`
`- MALES
`
`Terminal Sacrifice
`
`.
`
`_
`
`Macro-hm intimate
`Polykaryocytosis,
`, “
`-
`urothelium, clvis
`_ Tubule I”mention
`De ' enemtion -
`Skeletal muscle
`Liver
`Necrosis
`nvolution
`Thus
`on estion
`vemle
`
`Kidney
`
`Testis
`
`Recovery Sacnfce
`
`control
`
`Kidne
`Skeletal muscle
`
`Tubule reeneration
`De - eneralion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Other findings:
`One MD male had pneumonia, diagnosed as tuberculosis.
`Parasitic lesions were seen in multiple animals, usually in one animal/sex of one or two dose groups (including
`controls). Parasites were present in stomach, intestine, esophagus, lung, skeletal muscle and tongue.
`In multiple tissues, lymphohistiocytic infiltrates were observed (liver, kidney, tongue, trachea, urethra, vagina).
`Treatment-relatedness, mechanism and relevance of this effect were inconsistent and/or unclear.
`
`Toxicokinetics
`Determined:
`
`Cmax, Tmax, AUC (0-24h), CL/F, Tl/2
`-
`0 Day 1, 27, 83
`
`Toxicokinetic data avera e values
`_—
`_ IIl__—IIJ_
`_-
`— ——-—
`mm
`_-
`__—
`—IEII
`_-
`
`r l
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iii/WW
` LJ
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—_—_—_—
`mun—“l—
`___———
`——-____
`Ml—
`_--—__
`——_——__
`_—-————
`ru‘h/ml
`—_—————
`_——_——_
`_M
`—_-—_Im__
`—_-H-———
`——___——
`”HEM—__—
`C———-_—III-
`___-——Ii—
`——m——__
`—_— 134 __n-
`__-_Ii—lfi—I_
`——_————
`m-_m——_Ir_
`—————n5-_
`—_-—_—E_
`_—M-__
`_—__——l_
`_—--——I_
`* Values for Day I (AUC) may be underestimated (most values BLQ)
`“Nd = Not determined: T1/2 not determined for HD2 group (bid dosing schedule)
`
`Number of animals for which TK uarameters were deterrnined
`-W---
`——-—-—-——-
`m—m__-—l-_l-
`I-l-l-l-m-l-I-ml-
`n-m-II-l-l-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`_
`Summary toxicokinetics:
`Large variability in Cmax and AUC data, ie, inconsistent changes with dose and over time
`T1/2 varied from 5-10h
`Tmax varied from 2-15h
`
`Dosingbid. increased AUC as compared to dosing q.d. (compare BB] and HD2)
`Values suggest that AUC and Tm values in LD groups may be inaccurate and/or underestimated
`CL/F was not significantly related to dose
`Cmax and AUC non~linearly increased with dose, possibly due to relative decrease in absorption at higher
`doses
`'
`
`_
`
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`
`Sponsor concluded that AUC (f) < AUC (m). Although statistically CL/F was overall significantly higher in
`females than in males, examination of AUC values does not support consistent differences (cg AUC values
`on Day 83 are similar in HD males and HD females)
`'
`Sponsor concluded that CL/F (Day83)>CL/F(Day27). The increase in CL/F over time suggests induction of
`clearance (metabolism). Reviewer concurs with this conclusion.
`There was no evidence of accumulation of parent drug over time.
`
`SUMMARY AND EVALUATION
`Introduction:
`
`The pharmacologic action of the calcimimetic AMGO73 consists of a lowering of parathyroid gland PTH
`secretion and reduction of serum calcium levels. PTH levels are elevated in patients with hyperparathyroidism
`(HPT). In primary HPT this is due to excessive PTH secretion, and in secondary HPT it is usually due to renal
`failure with chronic hypocalcemia and an adaptive increase in PTH secretion. The compound AMG—073 is being
`developed for the treatment of primary and secondary HPT.
`
`.
`Summary:
`Effects of AMG~073 in a 3-month toxici
`
`stud in c
`
`omol- us monke s
`
`——m
`m_ SoMiuid feces
`LD, MD, HD
`LD, MD, HD
`_—__
`BW ain reduced
`LD, MD, HD*
`LD‘,MD‘,HD‘
`————
`Timerval rolon_ed I'll-III—
`_—_—
`Hb Hctdecrease.
`Im- LD W H)"
`—_—_
`_—_ MD.HD‘
`Monocyte/eosinophil“
`MD, HD"
`decrease
`‘
`
`
`
`__—_
`Clinical chemi
`-
`Total cholesteroldecreasc MM
`—__—
`__—IE—
`__ HDI HDZ‘ _ ...... w. - M, . - .
`— Ca total or ionized decrease
`LD,MD",HD*
`‘
`LD MD‘,HD’
`—_ LD,MD.HD*
`umm HD*
`——m_n_
`____
`"__Efl—IE—
`————
`m— HD1',HD2
`LD,MD,HD
`LD: MD, Hm: H132
`MD,HD1‘,HD2 _
`Hmaunz —
`lsdecrease
`-_ Eidid
`— Liver/ailbladderincrease NEE—IE—
`_ n r/Parath oid decrease
`MD,HD _
`_I——_
`—_—_
`Histopathology
`Kidney polykaryocytosis,
`elvic urothelium
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`65
`
`

`

`K.,.,,,,:,.7.-ra-a~.~-,.-.p 4 ,-.n4...,-,...,
`
`u
`
`.
`
`,
`
`,._».tr‘ v» «,{u _..
`
`.
`
`..
`
`.
`
`—l-—_IEE_
`,——_n_
`—_ Lemma —
`‘statistically significant effects
`
`NOAEL 6 mg/kg/day
`LOAEL 5 mg/kg/day
`
`The effects first observed at the LOAEL (LD 5 mg/kg/day) were (in both sexes):
`Abnormal clinical signs (m,f)
`'
`Body weight gain reduction (bin) 1
`Hemoglobin and hematocrit decrease (f>m)
`Serum Ca decrease and P increase (m,f)
`Thymus weight decrease (m,f)
`Thymus involution (m)
`
`The effects first observed at the next higher dose (MD 50 mg/kg/day) were:
`WBC decrease (f>m)
`’
`Cholesterol decrease (m,f)
`Testis weight decrease (m)
`Liver/gallbladder weight increase (m>f)
`Thyroid/parathyroid weight decrease (m)
`Kidney pelvic polykaryocytosis (f>m)
`Spleen congestion (f)
`
`The effects first observed at the next higher dose (HD 100 mg/kg/day) were:
`Prolonged QT interval (f>m)
`PT increase (In)
`Triglyceride increase (m)
`ALT increase (f>m)
`Creatine kinase increase (m>f)
`Kidney weight increase (0
`Epididymis weigth decrease (In)
`.Spleen weight increase (0
`Thymus small (m,f)
`’
`Thymus involution (m)
`Liver necrosis (f)
`
`Safeg Evaluation:
`
`W4 .. we
`
`The currently reviewed study indicates that AMG-073, as expected, lowers serum calcium in healthy '
`normocalcemic animals. Although data on P’I‘H were not provided it is likely that this is the result of lowering
`_ PTH secretion by the parathyroid gland. The hypocalcemia was seen at all doses applied (5-50-100 mg/kg/day).
`
`" "
`
`'
`
`The hypocalcemia is expected to cause a number of secondary changes in clinical and histo—pathology. The
`findings of emesis, sofi feces, reduced body weight gain, extended PT time, and a prolonged cardiac QT interval,
`seen in this study, are probably (or at least partly) hypocalcemia—related.
`
`However, various other findings have an unclear relationship to the hypocalcemia. These include hematology
`findings, serum chemistry changes, gross pathology and histopathology changes and organ weight changes.
`
`The decrease in Hb and Hot values in males and females, and the reduced RBC in females was small but
`significant, and appeared not to be reversed afier 2 weeks. The WBC decrease which was more prominent in
`females appeared to be partially transient over time, and reversible upon recovery. The mechanism of these
`:hematology changes is unclear.
`'
`
`66
`
`

`

`,
`
`‘
`
`,g ”24,“,
`
`.,,. .U ._,.., In,
`
`._ u...
`
`x.
`
`.7»... 5M. ,.
`
`.1 r xvvamtust- -.
`
`The cholesterol decrease may have been related to some effect of the test compound on hepatic lipid
`metabolism, and the ALT increase in the HD groups suggests possrble liver cell injury. Cholesterol increase was
`partially and ALT increase was completely reversed in 2 weeks.
`
`The creatine kinase increase at high doses suggests muscle injury, and may be related to hypocalcemia.
`
`'
`
`The thymus involution in drug-treated males, and the incidence of small thymus and the (non dose-related) ,
`' thymus weight decrease in both sexes, particularly females, is unexplained. The (non-dose related)
`thyroid/parathyroid weight decrease in males may be a study artifact or may be related to the pharmacologic
`effect of the test compound to inhibit parathyroid PTH release. The kidney weight increase seen in high dose
`females is unexplained. The mechanism of the testicular and epididymal weight decrease in males is also unclear.
`
`Regarding the increased liver weight, particularly in males, the Sponsor has stated in a telephone conversation
`with this Reviewer (March 8, 1999) that the compound induces microsomal enzyme activity and that this is the
`underlying cause of the liver weight and serum enzyme increases. Reviewer feels that the toxicokinetic data on
`CL/F may support this conclusion.
`
`Histopathologically, there were findings in kidney, spleen and liver. Accompanying this were weight increases of
`all three organs in HD groups. The kidney findings included polykaryocytosis of pelvic urothelium in MD and
`HD males and females. The toxicological relevance of this finding and its relation to the increased kidney weight
`observed in females is unclear. Spleen congestion was seen in 1 MD and 2 HD females and its cause is unClear.
`Liver necrosis was observed in I out of 4 females monkeys in the HI); group. The relevance of this finding is
`unsettled. The animal with focal necrosis had slightly elevated ALT values. However, other animals e.g. in the
`HD, group had much higher ALT values while no observed liver histopathology abnormalities.
`
`Drug-related histopathology findings for testis/epididymis, or thyroid/parathyroid, i.e., organs whose weight was
`reduced by drug treatment, were not observed.
`
`In conclusion, the main potential target organs for toxicity of AMG-073 appear to be:
`kidney, spleen, liver, testis and epididymis, thymus, thyroid/parathyroid.
`'
`
`Comparison with results from rodent toxicity studies
`Findings from previously reported rat and mouse three-month toxicity studies with AMG—073 (Submission date:
`August 14, 1998, Review date: September 17,2998) that were similar to findingsin the 3-month monkey study
`were.
`
`Decreased body weight gain (rat, mouse)
`Serum Ca decrease, P increase (rat, mouse)
`Kidney pelvic dilation (rat, mouse)
`Kidney transitional cell hyperplasia (male rat)
`
`Other findingsin the rodent studies werenot seen or werenot consistentwith the present findingsin the monkey. ,
`Forexample, except for theanticipatedserum Ca and P changes, there were no significant hematology or serum ,
`-. chemistry findings, and Several organ weights, including liver and kidney,were decreased rather than increased.
`The species specificity of the test compound’s effects may be related to species:-specific drug metabolism
`
`,
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In the currentstudy report, except for. the calcium lowering effect of the test compound, the Sponsor did either
`not comment on the apparently treatment-related effects, or stated that the effects were not considered
`toxicologically adverse, or that they were possibly due to nonspecific stress of test article administration.
`Reviewer feels there is no satisfactory explanation for the treatment-related findings in monkeys that were not
`clearly related to the hypocalcemic action of the drug, nor do we know their clinical relevance. These findings
`included Hb, Hct, RBC and WBC decreases, serum cholesterol decrease and ALT increase, testis and
`epididymes weight decrease, kidney weight increase, thymus weight decrease and involution, liver weight
`increase and necrosis, spleen weight increase and congestion.
`
`67
`
`....
`
`,-..-,.. m...“ ..L "nu ~.. .
`at.) r
`
`

`

`
`
`Adrenals
`
`
`
`
`S . nsor Stud # 100020
`l l
`
`
`Species: Monkey
`Organ
`
`
`
`wei t
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`A
`
`'
`
`
`
`Pathology
`
`'5
`
`>4
`
`
`
`
`
`l ~p¢4M~.M-u~w w~w-9'u5
`
`-_..~.a-w 0.; ‘c-:~-W“t>-QW—u .
`
`,m—wm .«m-wn
`
`:.
`
`~:- '» » ,.
`
`,~ wv:
`
`-'
`
`‘w‘lé
`
`
`
`'68
`
`
`
`‘ Bone Marrow smear (sternum)
`Bone mrmow rib
`Bone femur
`one sternum
`E
`ecum‘
`Colon
`
`E"':1:C)m0w
`
`Epididymis
`suha_us
`
`Fallopian tube
`Gall bladder
`toss lesions
`Harder-inn gland
`
`Hyphophysis
`
`‘
`
`n'ection site
`Je'unum
`Kidne s
`Lacn'mal _larid
`
`,
`Liver
`uns with bronchi
`m-h nodes, cervical
`m -h nodes mandibular
`ym h nodes, mmenleric
`O.
`
`-u-vas2t"r!"r‘3.5;Bag'90‘wE35§:3E.§."’2.”
`
`erve -rachial + muscle
`e . tic nerves
`Ovaries
`
`5'.°'Q.QgE
`
`9BOE".2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket