throbber

`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`21-660
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW! S!
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY REVIEW AND EVALUATION
`
`NDA NUMBER:
`
`SERIAL NUMBER:
`
`21, 660
`
`000
`
`DATE RECEIVED BY CENTER:
`
`03/07104
`
`PRODUCT:
`
`ARI—007
`
`INTENDED CLINICAL POPULATION:
`
`-—
`
`SPONSOR:
`
`American Bioscience, Inc.
`
`DOCUMENTS REVIEWED:
`
`Electronic submission
`
`REVIEW DIVISION:
`
`Division of Oncology Drug Products (HEB-150)
`
`PHARM/TOX REVIEWER:
`
`Margaret E. Brower, PILD.
`
`PHARNI/TOX SUPERVISOR:
`
`John Leighton, Ph. D.
`
`DIVISION DIRECTOR:
`
`Richard Pazdur, M.D.
`
`PROJECT MANAGER:
`
`Sheila Ryan
`
`Date of original NDA review submission to Division File System (DFS): 12/ 17/04
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brower, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`1.
`
`ll.
`
`EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 3
`
`SUMMARY OF NONCLINICAL FINDINGS .................................................... 3
`
`2.6
`
`PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY REVIEW
`
`2.6.1
`
`INTRODUCTION AND DRUG HISTORY ................... . ................................... 5
`
`2.6.2 PHARMACOLOGY ........................................................................................... 9
`
`2.6.2.1 Summary
`2.6.2.2 Primary pharmacodynamics
`2.6.2.3 Secondary pharmacodynamics
`2.6.2.4 Safety pharmacology
`2.6.2.5 Pharmacodynamic drug interactions
`
`2.6.3
`
`PHARMACOLOGY TABULATED SUMMARY ............................................ 10
`
`2.6.4 PHARMACOKINETICS[TOXICOKINETICS ................................................. 10
`
`2.6.5
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS TABULATED SUMMARY ..................................... 17
`
`2.6.6
`
`TOXICOLOGY ............................................................................................... 18
`
`2.6.6.1 Overall toxicology summary ............................................................................ 18
`2.6.6.2 Single-dose toxicity ........................................................................................ 19
`2.6.6.3 Repeat-dose toxicity ........................................................................................ 23
`2.6.6.4 Genetic toxicology .......................................................................................... 24
`2.6.6.5 Carcinogenicity ............................................................................................... 24
`2.6.6.6 Reproductive and developmental toxicology ................................................... 24
`2.6.6.7 Local tolerance ............................................................................................... 30
`2.6.6.8 Special toxicoiogy studies ............................................................................... 30
`2.6.6.9 Discussion and Conclusions ...............................-............................................. 3 2
`
`2.6.6.10Tables and Figures .......................................................................................... 32
`
`2.6.7 TOXICOLOGY TABULATED SUMMARY ................................................... 32
`
`OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................... 33
`
`APPENDIX]ATTACHMENTS ........................................................................ 34
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 2i,660
`
`I.
`
`Recommendations
`
`Executive Summary
`
`A. Recommendation on Approvability: Approve
`
`B. Recommendation for Nonclinical Studies: Approve
`
`C. Recommendations on Labeling: See separate labeling review
`
`II.
`
`Summary of Nonclinical Findings
`
`A. Brief Overview of Nonclinical Findings
`Abraxane is composed of a Cremophor-free formulation of paclitaxel formulated in human serum albumin. The
`name Abraxane refers to the clinical formulation of the drug product used in Phase 3 studies, which is to be used
`commercially. This name refers to the natural biosource material, T. media, and a ratio of 1:9: paclitaxel: human
`serum albumin. Other biosource materials (manufactured by differing suppliers) of the drug used for pre-clinical and
`earlier clinical trials included
`.
`""""
`.paclitaxel. Suppliers of
`human serum albumin and ratios of paclitaxel to human serum albumin have also varied during the development of
`this Taxol analog. Names for the drug used for pro—clinical studies with these varying biosource and human serum
`albumin concentrations are known as Capxol and ABl-OOT. Pre—clinical pharmacokinetic studies comparing the
`differing biosource formulations and differing paclitaxel to HSA ratios have indicated only minor changes which
`would not significantly impact the comparative toxicity of the drug. However, since the natural biosource was
`utilized for Phase 3 studies and will be used commercially. it should be noted that this ABl-007 biosource exhibited
`a slightly higher systemic exposure, with an extended half-life compared to the
`.—-—-
`---r
`biosources.
`
`In general, acute toxicity and lethality of ABl-007 were significantly reduced as compared to Taxol, based on
`comparative lethal doses and MTDs. However, renal toxicity was observed in multiple toxicology studies with ABI—
`DOT-dosed rodents. Single—dose studies with ABI-007 in rats indicated renal toxicity at doses >540mg/m2. in these
`studies, lethality was observed at doses >720ntg/1112 and myelosupprcssion was reduced compared to Taxol. Rats
`administered ABl-007 exhibited swollen nerve root axons of the spinal cord at 540mg/m2, and urinary bladder
`hyperplasia, kidney fibresis, adrenal hyperplasia, and testicular atrophy at doses 354mg/m2; these findings were not
`observed with concurrently administered Taxol animals. in rodent pharmacokinetics studies, ABI-007 appears to be
`rapidly distributed to tissues with a greater volume of distribution and longer serum half-life compared to Taxol.
`
`Toxicology studies in dogs, and possibly swine were complicated by the immunological reaction of the human
`albumin to these animal models. Even so, neurotoxicity of ABl-007 in dogs appeared to be enhanced compared to
`that of Taxol.
`
`Abraxane is embryotoxic and fetotoxic when administered to rats at doses 36mg/m2, (approximately 0.02 of the
`daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m2 basis) on gestation days 7-17. Significant changes in
`reproductive parameters included increase of early and late resorptions ( 4.5 fold), reduction in litter size and live
`fetuses ( up to 3-fold), significant reduction in fetal BW and significant increase in numbers of fetuses with
`abnormalities. All fetuses were born dead or resorbed at 24mgfmZ in this study. Biologically significant fetal
`anomalies included fused digits, bulging eyes, folded retinas, microphthalmia, dilation of brain ventricles, septal
`defects in heart vasculaturc, fused lungs, small eye sockets, presence of extra cervical ribs, and incomplete or absent
`ossification of ribs and sternum. Eye anomalies and extra cervical ribs were also observed at the lowest dose tested,
`3mg/m2. In another study, significant changes in reproductive parameters included significantly reduced sperm
`count and sperm motility, absence of implantations and viable embryos, absence of fertility index, significant
`reduction of dams with viable fetuses, and maternal lethality. Testicrrlar atrophy/degeneration has also been
`observed in single—dose toxicology studies in rodents administered Abraxane at 354mg/rn2 and dogs administered
`l75n1g/n12.
`
`B. Pharmacologic Activity
`The effects of Taxol and ABI—OO'i on tumor free survival and tumor growth rate were compared for HT29 colon
`tumor, PC-3 prostate tumor, NCI-H522 lung tumor. SK-OV-3 ovarian tumor and MX-l mammary tumor. Abraxane
`
`3
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`was less toxic in tumor—bearing mice as measured by MTDS and LDSD. The LD50 was calculated to be 47 and
`30mg/kg/d for ABl-OO'I and Taxol, respectively. Antitumor activity of ABI-007 was similar to that of Taxol in some
`of these sudies at these dose levels; in other studies, antiturnor of ABI-007 was superior to that of Taxol. In a
`different study, the binding of ABI-007 to albumin, microtubules, and endothelial cells appeared to be superior to
`that of Taxol.
`
`C. Nonclinical Safety Issues Relevant to Clinical Use
`The incidence of Grade 3 sensory neuropathy was greater in Abraxane-treated patients in the Phase 3 comparative
`study of Abraxane vs. Taxol with lower frequency of neutropenia with Abraxane. Neurotoxicity appears to follow a
`similar pattern preclinically, although dog studies were complicated by the immunological reaction of the human
`serum albumin component of ABl-OO'I. Differences in neurotoxicity between Abraxane and Taxol therapy have
`been addressed clinically. Testicular atrophy/degeneration was observed in multiple studies with Abraxane.
`Abraxane is embryotoxic and fetotoxic to rats at doses of 0.05 the maximum daily recommended human dose on a
`mng basis. These findings have been addressed in the label. A study was submitted which iustified the increase in
`shelf—life specification of
`—-
`impurity
`—-
`from
`-_._.
`
`Ill.
`
`Administrative
`
`A. Reviewer signature:
`
`B. Supervisor Signature: Concurrence -
`
`
`
`Non-Concurrence -
`
`(sec memo attached)
`
`C. cc: list:
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brower, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`2. 6 PHARMACOLOGY/TOXICOLOGY RE VIEW
`
`2.6.1
`
`INTRODUCTION AND DRUG HISTORY
`
`NDA number: 21,660
`Review number: 1
`
`Sequence numberldateltype of submission:
`Information to sponsor: Yes (X ) No ( )
`Sponsor: American BioScience, Inc, Santa Monica, CA
`Manufacturer for drug substance :
`
`Previous suppliers of oaclitaxel for ABI«007:
`a.
`.__l
`
`Current supplier of paclitaxel for ABl-007:
`.a
`(natural biosource, T. media)
`
`Sources of Human Serum Albumin HSA :
`
`—’
`
`Current supplier of Human Serum Albumin:
`
`Reviewer name: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`Division name: Oncology
`HFD #: 150
`
`Review completion date: December 1, 2004
`
`Drug:
`
`Trade name: Abraxane (previous name: Capxol)
`Generic name: paclitaxel protein—bound particles for injectable suspension
`Code name: ABI-OO?
`'
`
`Chemical name: 5i}, ZO-epoxy—l, 2a, 4,7B, 10B, lSoc—hexahydroxytax-l l-en-9-one—4,
`benzoate- l 3Aester with (2'11, 3'S)—N-benzoylG-phenylisoserine
`CAS registry number: 33069-62-4
`Mole file number: N/A
`
`lO-diacctate—Z—
`
`Molecular formula/molecular weight: C41H51N014 /853.9l
`Structure:
`
`5H
`

`
`2
`
`’1:
`H
`
`Relevant INDs/NDASIDMFS: [ND 55,974 IND ——:
`NDA ——~
`.ND55,974
`
`IND / DMF ——
`
`NDA 20262,
`
`Drug class: cytotoxic
`
`Intended clinical population:
`
`-’
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`Clinical formulation:
`
`Dru roductf formulation com orients 50mL vial):
`
`
`
`_lrru~._
`Human serum albumin, USP
`900mg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For administration, each vial is reconstituted with 20mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, to give a suspension
`of fine particles containing 5mg paclitaxel/mL, pH
`‘-._
`
`Route of administration: iv, 30m infusion of 260mg/n12 q3w
`
`Disclaimer: Tabular and graphical information are constructed by the reviewer from the sponsor‘s submission
`unless cited otherwise.
`
`Data reliance : Except as specifically identified below, all data and information discussed below and necessary for
`approval of NDA # 21,660 are owned by American Bioscience, Inc. or are data for which American Bioscienee, Inc.
`has obtained a written right of reference. Any information or data necessary for approval of NDA a 21,660 that
`American Bioscience, Inc. does not own or have a written right to reference constitutes one of the following: (1)
`published literature, or (2) a prior FDA finding of safety or effectiveness for a listed drug, as described in the drug’s
`approved labeling. Any data or information described or referenced below from a previously approved application
`that American Bioscience, Inc. does not own (or from FDA reviews or summaries of a previously approved
`application) is for descriptive purposes only and is not relied upon for approval of NBA # 21,660.
`
`Studies reviewed within this submission:
`Pharmacology
`
`E691
`
`A0692
`
`A0693
`
`A0694
`
`SRI-LIF-97-
`171-90244
`
`BIO—EL—l
`
`
`Anticancer efficacy evaluation of American Bioscience compound ABI-007 against HT29 human
`tumor xenograft in athymic nude mice
`
`Comparison of effects of ABI-007 and Taxol in athymic nude mice with PC-3 human prostate
`tumor xeno_rafts
`Comparison of effects of ABI‘007 and Taxol in athymic nude mice with NCI-H522 lung tumor
`xenografts
`Anticancer efficacy evaluation of American Biosciences compound ABI—007, ABI—007HC and
`ABl-007LC against SK-OV-3 human ovarian tumor xenografi in ath
`ic nude mice
`Toxicity determination and efficacy studies of VivoRx compounds Capxol VR—3 and Capxol VR-4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Binding of paclitaxel to albumin, microtubules, and cells. Inhibition of binding by Cremophor-EL
`and com arative analysis of ARI-001T vs Taxol
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Distribution of Fifi-labelled AB1-007 and Taxol in tumor bearing mice
`Distibution of[ H]—1abelled ABI-OO? and Taxol in female tumor bearin_ mice
`Blood kinetics and tissue distribution ofpaclitaxel following a single intravenous dose ofCapxol in
`the rat
`
`Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of H-ABI-OO?‘ and Taxol following a single intravenous dose in
`the rat
`
`A590. l.2
`91096001
`
`P0202002
`
`NPOO 1 106
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Blood kinetics study on 3 formulations of ABI-007 following a single intravenous dose in rabbits at
`SOmg/kg
`
`
`
`P0297003
`Blood kinetics of H—paclitaxel derived radioactivity following single intravenous doses in the rat at
`
`
`9, 30, 90 and lZ-ing/kg
`
` i'0303014
`Blood kinetics study comparing 3 biosources ofpaclitaxel in ABl—007 following a single
`intravenous dose in the rat at 50mg/l-tg
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brower, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`Toxicology
`
`Pit-0002
`
`PR—0003
`
`PR—0004
`PR-0007
`
`P0397006
`
`Pilot study of myelosuppression in rats with Capxol and Taxol following a single intravenous
`
`administration
`
`Determination of the LDso in mice for Capxol and Taxol following a single intravenous
`administration
`
`LDSD of ABI-OO'." and Taxol following multi . le iv administrations
`Investigation of dose response to myelosuppression in rats following intravenous administration of
`Capxol
`Determination of the toxicity in rats of Capxol and Taxol following a single intravenous
`administration
`
`
`
`study of Ca uxol in bea _le dogs
`Fourteen day acute intavenous toxicit
`P0897001
`Fourteen day acute intavenous toxicity study of Ca mo] in bea
`P0997006
`LY‘CHRON— Toxicity of systemic delivery of nanoparticle paclitaxel (ABI-OO'I‘) in swine
`001
`
`Reproductive Toxicology
`
`
`Intravenous develomental toxicity study of aclitaxel in rats
`
`Intravenous fertility and general reproduction toxicity of paclitaxel in male rats
`
`4701-001
`4701-002
`
`Special Toxicology
`
`P0603001
`
`Comparison of the 28-day toxicity of ABI-OO'I‘ following a single intravenous dose of drug product containing usual and elevated levels of,
`
`f‘"
`
`in rats
`
`Studies not reviewed within this submission:
`
`t
`
`Drug History:
`Abraxane is composed of a Crcmophor-free formulation of the approved cytotoxic agent paclitaxel formulated in
`human serum albumin. Paclitaxel promotes the assembly of microtubules from tubulin dimers and stabilizes
`microtubules by preventing depolyrnerization. The sponsors of Abraxane (also known as Capxol and ABl-007) have
`used multiple suppliers ofpaclitaxel, as well as human serum albumin since the [ND was originally discussed and
`submitted in 1998. Three biosource materials have been studied during development of Abraxane:
`"“
`'
`---'
`nd natural biosource. Phase "l studies were conducted using the natural biosource, Taxus
`media, manufactured by
`'— _ . which is to be used commercially. The
`"" drug product was
`also used as the source of several Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies. Three other sources ofpaclitaxel have been used in
`the development of the drug product:
`
`1- Paclitaxel produced at '
`and several Phase I an Phase 2 studies.
`
`-"
`
`V
`
`.
`
`.
`
`was used in pre—clinical
`
`2-
`
`..._
`-'
`
`was the supplier ofpaclitaxel in the original IND (IND 55,974) manufactured
`and used in Phase 1 clinical studies and pro-clinical studies.
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA No. 21,660
`
`3-
`
`. provided a single lot of technical grade paclitaxel used in exploratory
`pharmacodynamics studies in mice.
`
`n
`
`utilized.
`
`Sources of the (HSA) human serum albumin have also changed during the development of Abraxane. The
`HSA supplied by
`""
`""‘
`
`_
`
`kcurrent supplier) were subsequently
`
`Pro-clinical pharmacokinetic studies comparing the dilTering biosource formulations and differing paclitaxel to HSA
`ratios have indicated only minor changes which would not significantly impact the comparative toxicity of the drug.
`
`Mam nut
`on antenna—Em
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 21,660
`
`2.6.2
`
`PHARMACOLOGY:
`
`2.6.2.1 Brief summary
`The efficacy of Taxol and ABI-OO? were compared as to their effects on tumor free survival and tumor
`growth rate for HT29 colon tumor, PC—3 prostate tumor, NCI-HSZZ lung tumor, SK-OV—3 ovarian tumor and MX-l
`mammary tumor (See table below). ABI—007 was less toxic in tumor-bearing mice as measured by MTDs and L050.
`The LDSQ was calculated to be 47 and 30mg/kg/d for ABI—007 and Taxol, respectively. Antitumor activity of ABI-
`007 was similar to that of Taxol in some of these sudies at these dose levels; in other studies, antitumor of ABl-007
`
`was superior to that of Taxol. In a different study, the binding of ABI—OO7 to albumin, microtubules, and endothelial
`cells appeared to be superior to that of Taxol.
`
`2.6.2.2 Primary pharmacodynamics:
`
`Multiple iv dose — efficacy of
`increasing doses of ABl-007 or
`Taxol
`
`Multiple iv dose — efficacy of
`increasing doses of ABl-007 or
`Taxol
`
`MTD: 20mg/kg ABl-007, 13.4mg/kg
`Taxol. Antitutnor activity of ABI-007
`superior at s-ecified doses
`MTD: 20mg/kg ABl-007, 13.4mg/kg
`Taxol. Antitumor activity of ABl-007
`similar to Taxol
`
`Multiple iv dose — efficacy of
`increasing doses of ABl-007 or
`Taxol
`
`MTD: 20mgfkg ABl-OO7, 13.4mg/kg
`Taxol. High rate of response to both
`ABl-007 and Taxol
`
`Studytt
`A069.1
`
`A0692
`
`A0693
`
`A069.4
`
`Animal model
`NCr-nu mice w!
`HT29 human colon
`tumor
`
`NCr-nu mice wf
`PC—3 human
`
`prostate tumors
`NCr-nu mice w/
`NCI-H522 human
`
`lung tumors
`NCr-nu mice w! SK-
`OV-3 human
`ovarian tumors
`
`Control: no survival after 47d
`
`SRI—LIF-97-
`17130242
`
`NCr-nu mice w/
`MX—l human
`mammary tumors
`
`Multiple iv dose — efficacy of
`increasing doses of ABl-OO')’ or
`Taxoi
`
`Multiple iv dose — efficacy of
`increasing doses of 3 ABI-007
`formulations or Taxol
`
`MTD: 20mgfkg AB1~OO7, 13.4mg/kg
`Taxol. All 3 ABI-007 formulations
`
`superior to Taxol
`(formulations differed in ratio of
`aclitaxel to albumin)
`Tumor-free survival for ABl-007
`
`treated mice superior
`MTD differs for this study
`ABl-007 (45mg/kg/d) [00% survival
`to 103d
`
`Taxol (30mg/kg/d) 40% survival to
`103d
`
`Several pharmacology studies were performed to investigate efficacy. These studies indicated that tumor
`accumulation of ABI-007 was higher than that of 'l‘axol. Mice administered paclitaxel formulated as ABI-OO?
`exhibited decreased plasma AUC and increased tumor AUC compared to mice administered paclitaxel formulated as
`Taxol.
`
`Study # BlO-EL-l Binding of paclitaxel to albumin, microtubules, and cells. Inhibition of binding by
`Cremophor—EL and comparative analysis of ABI-007 versus Taxol
`The binding of paclitaxel to human serum albumin, microtubules and endothelial cells were inhibited by clinical
`levels of Cremophor/ethanol. The binding of the ABLOO? formulation to human serum albumin, microtubules and
`endothelial cells appeared to be superior to that of Taxol.
`
`Mechanism of action: The mechanism of action of ABI—OO? can be described as the facilitation of active
`
`transport of albumin—bound paclitaxel into a tumor site by an albumin receptor. While targeting the vascular
`endothelium, the intratumoral concentration of the drug is increased by utilizing an amplification effect imparted by
`angiogenesis, resulting in increased efficacy white expecting to minimize exposure to normal tissue.
`
`Drug activity related to proposed indication: no specific data submitted preclinically
`
`2.6.2.3 Secondary pharmacodynamics No data submitted
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 21,660
`
`2.6.2.4 SAFETY PHARMACOLOGY:
`
`Neurological effects: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Cardiovascular effects: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Pulmonary effects: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Renal effects:
`
`No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Gastrointestinal effects: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Abuse liability: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`Other: No safety pharmacology studies submitted
`
`2.6.2.5 Pharmacodynamic drug interactions No studies submitted
`
`2.6.3 PHARMACOLOGY TABULATED SUMMARY
`
`[See above summary]
`
`2.6.4 PHARMACOKINETICS/TOXICOKINETICS:
`
`2.6.4.1 Brief summary
`Pre—clinical studies indicate that ABI-OO'.‘1 is similar to Taxol in several parameters. Metabolism and
`excretion are similar to that ofTaxol; excretion is primarily fecal and these drugs are largely eliminated within 48h
`ofdosing. However, ABl-007 exhibits a greater volume of distribution and longer half-life compared to Taxol.
`Distribution is rapid with highest tissue distribution in prostate, liver, seminal vesicles, lung, pancreas, spleen, GI
`and kidney; in a separate study, tissue concentration was highest in liver, testes and ovaries. In general, tissues with
`highest JH-ABI-Dffl derived radioactivity concentrations are involved in metabolism/excretion, contain a high
`proportion of dividing cells, or are highly perfused. Mice administered paclitaxel formulated as ABI-OO'J' exhibited
`decreased plasma AUC and increased tumor AUC compared to mice administered paclitaxel formulated as Taxol.
`Similar pharmacokinetics were exhibited for differing albuminzpaclitaxel ratios of ABI—007 and differing
`formulations using natural,
`-—-
`biosourcc for ABI-007. However, Since the
`natural biosource was utilized for Phase 3 studies and will be used commercially, it should be noted that this ABI-
`007 biosource exhibited a slightly higher systemic exposure, with an extended half-life compared to the
`~—
`__
`biosources. For this study, study authors indicate measurement of whole blood
`
`paclitaxel.
`
`2.6.4.2 Methods of Analysis
`[See individual study reviews]
`
`2.6.4.3 Absorption (incorporated in studies below)
`
`2.6.4.4 Distribution
`
`Study title: Blood kinetics and tissue distribution of paclitaxel following a single intravenous dose of Capxol
`in the rat
`
`Key Findings:
`- Rapid distribution ofJH-Capxol from blood to tissues
`- Tissue distribution highest: prostate, liver, seminal vesicles, lung, pancreas, spleen, GI, kidney
`' AUC 0.2.", 60% of total radioactivity are metabolites
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 2l,660
`
`Study no: P1096001
`1
`Volume #, and page #1 vol 2, p.
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`Date of study initiation: November l8, 1996
`GLP compliance: yes
`QA report: yes (X) no ( )
`~— , [portion of JH—Paclitaxel
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and % purity: 3H—Paclitaxel. lot #l24-l3 [-0023,
`formulated to 3H-Capitol], radiochemical purity _'
`onradiolabeled paclitaxel, lot 96091 l,
`.—
`Formulation/vehicle: diluted with 0.9% NaCl (Taxol vehicle not specified, although historically diluted with
`0.9%NaCL).
`
`Dosing:
`
`Speciesfstrain: rat/Sprague Dawley (males only)
`#lsex/group (main study): 10
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics: none
`Age: 7-8w
`Weight: not provided
`Doses in administered units: 5.lmg/kg Capxol (84.6uCi/g); 4.9mg/kg Taxol (radiolabeled; details
`unspecified)
`Specific activity: 62,909dpm/ug (3H-paclitaxel in dosing solution)
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate: iv, dose volume 1.67mng
`Method of Analysis: LC/MS
`Blood collection: 2, 5, l5, 30m, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24h
`
`Total radioactivity and parent compound level following administration of Capxol l bi-phasically over 5h post-dose
`followed by linearl to 24h. AUC 0,24}, exposure for parent paclitaxel was 60% of total radioactivity due to
`metabolism. The following tissues exhibited the highest total radiolabel distribution (up to 5X paclitaxel blood
`level): prostate, liver, seminal vesicles, lung, pancreas, spleen, GI tract, kidney (See Sponsor's graph below). With
`exception of pancreas, tissues with highest concentrations are involved in metabolism/excretion (liver, GI, kidney),
`contain a high proportion of dividing cells (seminal vesicles, prostate), or are highly perfused (lung and spleen).
`
`Blood levels following Capxol administration were lower than following similar Taxol dose, indicating more rapid
`distribution out of blood (2m post-dose sample). Similar pattern of metabolism were observed for both Capxol and
`Taxol. However, the rate of metabolism was significantly slower for Capxol as 44% of blood reactivity remains as
`paclitaxel 24h post-dose, compared to 22.4% for Taxol. Predominantly fecal excretion was exhibited with both
`drugs, with only minimal excretion via urine.
`
`Paclitaxel
`concentration
`
`AUCo.24(ugeq-hrme)
`
`Cmaxtug eq/mL)
`
`
`
`_.
`_.
`
`|—.
`_0-2
`
`Tissue radioactivity levels were higher 24h following Capxol administration as compared to Taxol administration
`for 9 of 14 assayed tissues. Tissue/blood ratios were higher for Capxol-dosed animals with lower paclitaxel-blood
`levels, indicating rapid distribution of Capxol from blood to tissues.
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`

`

`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brower, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 21,660
`
`”I
`
`'l'iSér: [oldioactivity Levels Esprcswé 23 ppm Helium! EqLivnlcnis
`24 Hours Following a Single intravenous Administration of
`“‘i'E-l‘axaf‘” rt 4 9 my’kg or 3li-Ca_mca:.l’~"‘- at S ': map-”Kg
`i
`ll| l
`
`“-4;wa r_
`
`
`
`Summary:
`Total radioactivity of ABl-007 decreased biphasically over Sh post-dose followed by linear decrease to 24h.
`The distribution of 3l—l—Capxol from blood to tissues appears to be rapid; tissue distribution was highest in prostate,
`liver, seminal vesicles, lung, pancreas, spleen, GI and kidney. Metabolites comprised 60% ofCapxol AUC 9.2.".
`total
`radioactivity. Metabolism was slower for 3H—Capxol as compared to 3H-Taxol, with 44% of blood radioactivity
`remaining as paclitaxel 24h post-dose, compared to 22% for 1H—Taxol.
`
`2.6.4.5 Metabolism (Studies grouped as Metabolism/Excretion)
`2.6.4.6 Excretion
`
`Blood kinetics of 3H-paclitaxel derived radioactivity following single intravenous doses of
`Study title:
`Capitol in the rat at 9. 30, 90, and 120mg/kg
`
`Note: Doses administered to animals varied from doses indicated in study title (see below).
`
`Key study findings:
`' JH—ABI-007 slowly metabolized in vivo; 7-l9% unchanged at 24h
`' Exposure increases disproportionately with increasing dose
`
`--'
`
`Study no: P0297003
`Volume #, and page #: Vol 2, p, 1; Electronic submission
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`Date of study initiation: April 2, I997
`GLP compliance: yes
`QA report: yes (X) n0( )
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and “/o purity:
`. purity);
`._..
`purity), 127-097-0053 '
`aH-paclitzixel, lot?! : 124-131-0028 (' _
`nonradiolabeled paclitaxel: 101%? 960911. ' - purity; nonradiolabeled Capxol: lot# A5»05, purity not
`provided
`JHACapxol batches # A4-75, A5-03 formulated from above paclitaxel; noted purity
`Dose/group (5M): paclitaxel doses: 9.], 26.4, 1 16.7, 148.1mg/kg
`radioactive dose: 38.6, 35.6, 39.3, 36.8uCi respectively
`Blood sample collection: 2, 5, 15m, 0.5, l, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24h post—dose
`
`.—
`
`24h HPLC analysis indicated 7-l9% of blood radioactivity as unchanged paclitaxel, indicating a slow rate of
`metabolism. Exposure increases disproportionately with increasing dose, suggesting saturation ofclearance.
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 21,660
`
`
`
`Study title:
`(lose in the rat
`
`Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 3H-ABl-007 and Taxol following a single intravenous
`
`Key study findings:
`- Highest tissue distribution in liver, testes and ovaries, JH'ABI'OOT; lung, liver, testes, 3H—Taxol
`~ Primary route of excretion: feces
`- 3H-ABl-OO'F excreted in urine as metabolite, feces as paclitaxel
`
`Study no: P0202002
`Volume #, and page #2 Vol 2, p. 1; Electronic submission March, 2004
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`_....
`Date of study initiation: July 24, 2002
`GLP compliance: yes
`QA report: yes (X) no ( )
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and "/9 purity: 3l-l-ABI—OO'.", 3H-paclitaxel (lot# 424—218-003, 424-242-0147)
`Non-radiolabcled paclitaxel (10t#15359/N) manufactured by _" , purity final drug "‘
`3l’l—Taxol as control
`
`Formulation/vehicle: reconstituted with 0.9% NaCl
`
`Dosing:
`Specieslstrain: rat/Sprague Dawley
`#lsexlgroup (main study): 5 (2 misdosed animals replaced)
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: none
`Age: 7—8w M; 11-12w F
`Weight: 182-223g
`Doses in administered units: jH-Taxol: 5.93mg/kg M, 5.98mg/kg F; 3H-r‘lBl-L‘lOT: 7.69mg/kg M, 7.79mg/kg F
`Route, volume, and infusion rate: iv, dose volume 5ml/kg, final diluted concentration: 1mg paclitaxel/mL
`Method of Analysis: LC/MS (measured 3l-l-paclitaxel derived from ABl-OO'I' and Taxol)
`Urine/fecal sample collection: 0—4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-24, 24-36, 36-48, 43-72, 72-96, 96-120h following dosing
`
`The highest concentration of 3l-l-ABI-DO? derived radioactivity was found in the liver, testes and ovaries;
`distribution was similar in males and females (See Sponsor's graphs below).
`In comparison, the highest
`concentration of 3H~Taxol derived radioactivity was found in the lung, liver and testes. As with previous studies, the
`primary route of excretion was the feces; fecal excretion was 82 and 78% of administered dose of ABI—OO'I‘ in males
`and females, respectively, between 8-120h (compared to 77 and 75% in Taxol-treated males and females for the
`same time interval). The majority of this fecal radioactivity was excreted within 48h following dosing. Comparative
`excretion in the urine was 8. 10% and 12.45% in males (between 4 and 120h) and females (between 0 and 1201])
`administered Taxol, respectively, and 9.51% and {4.07% in males and females administered ABl—007, respectively
`for the same time intervals Little radioactivity was observed in tissue samples afier 5d post-dose.
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brewer, PhD.
`
`NDA NO. 21,660
`
`res-Tn m. "IHsilx‘Iu-r R. rim-s u |A=.':u- I133.
`
`:2 -. ”my a r I 151‘ ; ‘lru-s “damn";- l-m: m. 4.4.1 =li.'§4ml;m1'1[.,r.lllvcn'yu
`MAR-r.-
`
`';
`H
`
`r
`F‘mrmxu
`unu—M‘am
`
`'
`
`E
`'
`:
`g
`‘
`
`_
`i
`.
`i
`
`1mm
`015x;
`one!)
`EIGJ
`a
`Emacs
`5; Ni 3
`,1 are
`u
`
`3:5;
`r1363
`a")
`'
`'DJ ,
`
`‘
`'1
`.
`‘
`
`‘,
`
`a
`
`'
`
`.
`'
`
`l
`
`‘-
`.
`
`i
`
`r
`
`i
`
`,
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`:-
`
`.
`i‘er-JJJR
`~=rn§
`>
`k
`-;
`_
`‘-)
`u
`i
`Q
`a
`
`.
`
`a
`
`..I ‘
`
`.
`
`«.1‘
`
`.
`
`ll ~:
`
`::g.
`
`!.."i!»:.mn 15:344.:an H.-
`
`I.
`‘ H;

`[-1
`al.
`.
`
`i
`3.
`:L t"('7!
`
`I,r.v~.
`at 45-51513!
`
`2.6.4.7 Pharmacokinetic drug interactions No studies submitted
`
`2.6.4.8 Other Pharmacokinetic Studies
`
`Blood kinetics study comparing three biosources of paclitaxel in ABI-007 following a single
`Study title:
`intravenous dose in the rat at 50mg/kg
`Lime: Natural bi0§ggr_ce_t_o_b§Ltil_i_zed commercialLy
`
`Key study findings:
`' Similar pharmacokinetics for paclitaxel fi'om 3 different biosources
`- Exposure ofpaclitaxel slightly higher for natural biosource
`-Termina] [112 ofpaclitaxcl extended w/ natural biosouree
`Cm“ of paclttaxel slightly higher for -
`biosource
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Margaret E. Brower, PhD.
`
`NDA N0. 21,660
`
`
`
`Study no: P0303014
`Volume #, and page #: Vol 2, p. 1, Electronic submission: March, 2004
`Conducting laboratory and location:
`Date of study initiation: April 21, 2003
`GLP compliance: yes
`)
`QA report: yes (X) no (
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and % purity: Three ABl—007 paclitaxel formulations, manufactured using differing
`biosource material:
`
`#C018-001(Capxol) biosource from ' —
`#Cl99-004, biosource frorr'
`"'
`#C102—005, biosource from —-
`
`Formulationfvehiele: diluted with 0.9% NaCl
`
`Dosing:
`
`Species/strain: rat/Sprague Dawley (males only)
`#lsex/group (main study): 8 (2 animals replaced due to misdosing)
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: none
`Age: 8-9w
`Weight: 254-280g
`Doses in administered units: 50mg/kg
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate: iv, dose volume Sml/lrg, final diluted concentration: 10mg
`paclitaxel/mL
`Method of Analysis: LC/MS
`Blood collection: 5, 15, 30m, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72h
`
`
`
`
`
`ABI—OO?
`Dose (mg/kg)
`
`biosource
`
`Terminal tug
`(h)
`
`
`
`Cmax (ng/mL)
`(normalized
`value)
`
`
`
`AUC inf
`AUC last
`{rig x h/mL)
`(ng x h/mL)
`
`
`(normalized
`(normalized
`
`
`value)
`value)
`
`48122
`48022
`(951}
`(953)
`
`
`50164
`50072
`6.1
`
`
`(1013)
`
`
`
`52046
`51915
`
`
`(1027)
`(1024)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(1012]
`
`7.8
`
`9.6
`
`I
`
`I
`l_(natural)
`
`
`
`The 3 formulations appeared to have similar pharmacokinetic parameters. Normalized AUC indicate that exposure
`was slightly higher with the natural biosource and lower with the
`-—'
`biosource. Terminal 0

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket