throbber
NDA 21-372
`
`Page 61
`
`6. Ophthalmic Examination: No treatment-related changes were observed.
`
`7. Organ Weights: Females at the 3 and 10 mg/kg dose levels exhibited higher adrenal gland
`weights (10 and 13% increases) compared to controls. However there were no differences in
`organ/body weight ratios in these groups and no associated gross or microscopic abnormalities
`observed with respect to the adrenal gland in these animals.
`
`8. Gross/Microscopic Pathology: No gross or microscopic changes related to treatment with
`RS-25,259-197 were observed.
`
`In conclusion, the 3 mg/kg dose was the no effect dose for this study, and provides an adequate
`margin of safety for both the 0.3 ug/kg initial clinical dose and for the highest planned clinical
`dose, 120 ug/kg
`
`2.. Palonosetron Hvdrochloride: 28-Dav Subcutaneous Toxicity Studv in Juvenile Rats
`
`Report No: \ Report Number lO63/18-D6154
`
`Conducting laboratory and location: a _
`K
`
`Date Started: November 12, 1999
`
`Date of Study Report: July 2000
`Statutory Instrument 1999
`GLP compliance. Statements of compliance with t
`No 3106, The Good Laboratory Practice Regulations l999 and OECD Principles on Good
`Laboratory Practice (revised 1997, Issued January 1998) were included; however, there were no
`signatures.
`
`
`
`QA- Report: Yes (X) No 0
`
`Methods: In a 28-day subcutaneous toxicity. study, neonatal/juvenile rats received palonosetron
`at doses of 0, 5, 15, and 25 mg/kyday. The vehicle or drug solution was administered by the
`subcutaneous route for 31 days, starting at day 4 postpartum. In the clinical setting, the
`intravenous route of administration will be used; however, given the small size of animals in the
`study, the subcutaneous route was chosen. Rats (i.e., offspring) were killed and necropsied on
`day after the last treatment. Parental female rats received no treatment and were sacrificed
`following weaning of offspring.
`
`Dosing:
`species/strain: 30 time-mated female rats [Crl:CD(SD)lGSBR strain] were obtained from
`. to provide offspring for this study. The parental female rats
`were 8-10 weeks 01 and weighed at least 160 g at mating. Pregnant female rats were delivered
`by day 15 of gestation. These animals were allowed to deliver naturally and the day pups were
`first observed was designated as day 0 postpartum. On day 4 postpartum, litters were culled to 5
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 62
`
`pups/sex/litter through random selection. Culled pups were discarded. Pups were examined on
`day 4 postpartum prior to allocation to the study. Offspring within each litter were allocated to
`the same treatment group. Litters were randomly allocated to treatment groups. The litter
`performance of parental female rats and the viability of offspring up to day 4 postpartum were
`poorer than expected with the result that less than required number of offspring were available
`for allocation. Accordingly, no satellite animals were allocated to the control group. The sex of
`each offSpring was recorded on days 1 and 4 postpartum prior to allocation to treatment groups.
`Sexes were confirmed at weaning (day 2] postpartum) and prior to necropsy (day 34
`postpartum).
`- #lsex/group or time point: In the main study groups, there were leuvenile
`rats/sex/group.
`- age: Rats were 4 days of age at the start oftreatrnent.
`- weight: On day 4 postpartum, mean body weights ranged from 7.3 to 8.3 g for male
`rats and 6.3 to 7.9 g for female rats.
`- satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: In toxicokinetic groups that
`received palonosetron at 5, 15, or 25 mg/kg/day, there were 15 or 16juvenile rats/sex/group.
`— dosage groups in administered units: 0, 5, 15, and 25 mg/kg/day
`- route, form, volume, and infusion rate: the subcutaneous route using a dose volume
`of5 ml/kg administered Vehicle or drug solution.
`Drug, lot#, radiolabel, and % purity: Palonosetron, batch number 30893—P105 (Purity 99.4%)
`Formulation/vehicle: The vehicle was sodium chloride and sodium phosphate adjusted to pH
`7.4 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid in Water for Irrigation.
`Observations and times:
`
`— Clinical signs: Parental animals and offspring were monitored daily for clinical signs
`oftoxicity. During the treatment period, pups were observed immediately and at l and 4 hr after
`dosing. Animals were observed for moribundity/mortality twice per day. Offspring that died or
`were sacrificed in a moribund condition during the treatment period were submitted to a
`macroscopic examination.
`- Body weights: Pup body weights were measured on day 1 postpartum and daily during
`the treatment period (days 4 to 34 postpartum).
`- Food consumption: Food consumption was not measured due to the age of the
`animals.
`
`'- Ophthalmoscopy: Not performed.
`- EKG: Not performed.
`- Hematology: Not performed.
`- Clinical chemistry: Not performed.
`- Urinalysis: Not performw.
`- Gross pathology: On the day following the last dose, surviving offspring were
`sacrificed and submitted to necropsy examination.
`- Organs Weighed: Organ weights were detennined for the adrenal glands, brain, heart,
`kidneys, liver, pituitary gland, prostate gland, spleen, testes + epididymides, and thyroids +
`parathyroids.
`- Histopathology: Gross lesions, principally at injection sites, from all animals and
`tissues from the control and high dose groups were embedded in paraffin wax BP, sectioned at 5
`pm, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined by a pathologist. Deaths and moribund
`
`

`

`NDA 21—372
`
`Page 63
`'
`.
`sacrifices during the treatment period were considered unrelated to treatment, and
`histopathological examination was not extended to these animals. Tissues examined from the
`control and high dose groups were as follows: adrenal glands, brain, cecum, colon, duodenum,
`eyes, femur with bone marrow and articular surfaces, heart, ileum, jejunum, kidneys, liver, lungs
`with mainstem bronchi, mammary (females only), mandibular lymph nodes, mesenteric lymph
`nodes, esophagus, optic nerves, ovaries, pancreas, pituitary, prostate, salivary glands, sciatic
`nerves, skin, spinal cord (cervical, lumbar, and thoracic), spleen, stemum with bone marrow,
`stomach, testes and epididymides, thymus, thyroids and parathyroid, trachea, urinary bladder,
`and uterus.
`
`- Toxicokinetics: Blood for measurement of plasma levels ofpalonosetron and its
`metabolite, RS-l7825-007, was collected on days 1 and 28 (i.e., days 4 and 32 postpartum,
`respectively). Blood was collected from 4 or 5'rats/sex/group at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hr after dosing.
`Blood was obtained by decapitation on day 1 and from the orbital sinus on day 28. Samples were
`analyzed for palonosetron and RS—l7825—007 by.
`-_—_
`_
`’ Animals in toxicokinetic groups were discarded without examination following blood
`collection.
`
`- Other: Physical and functional development of rat pups was assessed. Eye opening
`was evaluated staning from day 13 postpartum. Evaluation of eye opening in the majority of
`pups was missed in error on day 16 postpartum. Air righting was evaluated on day 17
`postpartum. Pupillary reflex and auditory startle response were evaluated on day 21 postpartum.
`
`
`Results:
`
`- Clinical signs: For male and female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day, dose-related
`incidences of hair coat thinning, hair loss, and sores were observed at injection sites. For rats at
`15 and 25 mg/kg/day, the percentage of animals with eyes open on day 15 postpartum was
`slightly reduced to 27 and 25%, respectively, as compared to 41% for the controls. By day 17
`postpartum, all rats in control and treatment groups had opened their eyes. The incidences of
`male and female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day with an absent pupillary reflex on day 2]
`postpartum were increased as compared to controls. For male rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day, the
`pupillary reflex was absent for 30 and 20% of animals, respectively, as compared to a poor
`response for 10% ofcontrols. For female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day, the pupillary reflex was
`absent for 10 and 30% of animals, respectively, as compared to a normal reflex for 100% of
`female controls. The sponsor reported background control ranges for offspring having no
`pupillary reflex of 0-42% for males and 046% for females. There were no treatment-related
`effects on air righting ability-on postpartum day 17 or auditory response on postpartum day 21.
`
`Pupillary reflex on postpartum day 2] for rats that received palonosetron by the subcutaneous route at doses of O, 5,
`
`
`
`(mean % of u-s showin_ a res-onse).- da15, and 25 m- '
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 64
`
`- Mortality: There appeared to be no treatment-related mortality. Two female control
`rats (#123 and #124) were found dead, 1 on day 9 and l on day 6. Two female control rats (#121
`and #130) were sacrificed in a moribund condition, 1 on day 12 and 1 on day 27. One female
`control rat (#125) was missing and presumed cannibalized. One female rats at 5 mg/kg/day was
`sacrificed in a moribund condition on day 30, due to the poor condition ofits right eye following
`the orbital sinus bleed. Two male rats at 15 mg/kg/day (#62 and #64) were sacrificed in a
`moribund condition, 1 on day 7 and l on day 5. One male rat at 15 mg/kg/day (#61) was found
`dead on day 8. One male rat and one female rat at 15 mg/kg/day (#65 and #183) were found dead
`on day 6. One male rat and one female rat at 25 mg/kg/day (#91 and #212) died on day 30
`following anesthesia used for the orbital sinus bleed. The study protocol provided by the sponsor
`did not describe collection of blood samples from the orbital sinuses of rats in the main study on
`day 30. Further, the purpose of these blood samples was not described.
`
`- Body weights: Body weight gains were suppressed >10% for male treatment groups
`and female rats at 25 mg/kg/day. Body weights for male controls on days 4 and 34 postpartum
`were 7.3 and 121.0 g, respectively. Body weight gains for male rats at 5, 15, and 25 mg/kg/day
`were 88.6, 87.9, and 81.1% of the control, respectively. Body weights for female controls on
`days 4 and 34 postpartum were 7.2 and 108.6 g, respectively. Body weight gains for female rats
`at 5, 15, and 25 mg/kg/day were 94.3, 101.8, and 87.0% ofthe control, respectively.
`1.
`
`— Organ Weights: Changes in adjusted spleen and liver weights were observed for male
`and female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day; however, there were no corresponding histopathological
`changes.
`
`- Gross pathology: For male and female rats that received palonosetron at 15 or 25
`mg/kg/day, thinning of the hair coat, hair loss, and sores were evident at injection sites (i.e., right
`and left shoulders and right and left hips). The incidence ofpelvic dilatation in the kidneys was
`increased for male and female rats at 25 mg/kg/day. The incidence ofprotruding eyes was
`increased for male and female treatment groups.
`
`
`
`9 8 7
`
`Gross pathological findings for rats that received palonosetron at subcutaneous doses of 0, 5, 15, or 25 mg/kg/day
`from days 4 to 34 .05 arturn.
`
`
`Female rats
`
`
`
`Skin + subcutis
`
`
`-sore
`
`
`-fur loss
`
`-red
`Lefi shoulder
`
`
`
`~fur loss
`
`
`-sore
`
`
`
`-red
`
`
`Right shoulder
`
`
`
`
`
`-fur loss
`-sore
`
`
`
`-red-__1_8_——-3-
`
`
`
`6
`
`9
`
`7
`
`9
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`Page 65
`
`-red
`
`-.rotrudin_
`
`
`
`
`-oelvic dilatation
`
`
`--ale
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`- Histopathology: Target organs (or tissues) oftoxicity were injection sites, optic
`nerves, and kidneys. For male and female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day, histopathological changes
`at injection sites included mineralization, hemorrhage, acanthosis, dermatitis, and cellulitis.
`Cellulitis was characterized by loss of the squamous cell layer with inflammatory cell infiltration
`ofthe underlying epidermis and demu's with scab formation and infiltration into the underlying
`muscle. Additionally, mineralization of the hair follicles and muscle fibers was observed. For
`male and female rats at 25 mg/kyday, the incidence of neuropathy (slight to minimal, focal) in
`the optic nerves was increased. For male and female rats at 25 mg/kg/day, the incidence of pelvic
`dilatation in the kidneys was increased. The incidences of focal nephropathy and papillitis were
`increased for female rats at 25 mg/kgday.
`Histopathological findings for rats that received palonosetron at subcutaneous doses of O, 5, 15,
`or 25 mg/kgday from days 4 to 34 postpartum.
`
`
`O_,(ION 3
`
`Male rats '
`
`Female rats
`
`Skin + subcutis
`N =
`
`10
`
`2
`
`9
`
`5
`
`2
`
`—_—__—_
`
`—hemorrhage
`dermatitis
`-cellulitis
`
`Left shoulder
`
`
`N =
`
`
`-mineralization
`-hemorrhage
`
`
`-acanthosis
`-dermatitis
`
`-cellulitis
`
`Right shoulder
`
`
`N =
`
`
`-mineralization
`
`
`4
`0
`'0
`0
`5
`2
`0
`O
`-hemorrhage
`
`
`9
`6
`0
`0
`7
`4
`0
`0
`-dermatitis
`‘
`9
`7
`0
`0
`7
`4
`0
`0
`-cellulitis
`
`___-___—
`
`
`l
`2
`l
`
`9
`
`5
`6
`l
`9
`7
`
`9
`4
`
`0
`O
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`O
`0
`' 0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`I
`\
`
`0
`
`0
`O
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`6
`
`0
`2
`l
`2
`S
`
`6
`0
`
`l
`2
`1
`
`7
`
`0
`0
`0
`5
`4
`
`8
`0
`
`9
`
`6
`2
`1
`8
`8
`
`9
`7
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`.
`
`0
`2
`0
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`O
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`Page 66
`N =
`-mineralization
`
`-hemorrhage
`—acanthosis
`-dennatitis
`-cellulitis
`
`-mineralization
`
`—hemorrhage
`-acanthosis
`—dermatitis
`-cel|ulitis
`
`OOOOOO
`OOOOOO
`
`
`
`-pelvic dilatation
`—focal nephropathy
`- . a . illitis
`
`- Toxicokinetics: For male and female rats, plasma AUC values for palonosetron on
`days I and 28 increased with elevating dose, although, observed increases were greater than
`proportional to dose. Plasma AUC values for palonosetron were similar on days 1 and 28. There
`appeared to be no gender-related differences in plasma AUC values for palonosetron. Due to
`limited sample volumes available on day l oftreatment, AUC values for palonosetron in the low
`and high dose group males were not determined and toxicokinetic analysis for RS-17825-OO7
`was not performed at any dose level. The sponsor reported that low concentrations of the
`metabolite, RS-l 7825-007, were detected in the low and intermediate dose groups on day 28 to
`the extent that toxicokinetic analysis could be conducted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters for palonosetron in rats that received palonosetron by the subcutaneous route at
`doses of 5, 15, or 25 ma/kelday.
`Dose
` Ba 28
`
`
`
`M g/kg
`Tm, hr
`AUCQHM, ng'hr/ml
`Cm,
`Tm, hr
`AUCOZHHD ng'hr/ml
`Cw,
`
`n- ml
`n_ ml
`Z
`3
`
`~11
`
`
`_F -_—II- —_F —---
`
`IiKl!
`1
`0.
`.5
`.5
`.
`—2.
`.
`38.63 -0
`4707
`646 76
`75210
`776.50
`
`1357.68
`
`558.71
`
`1393.40
`
`655.68
`
`700.90
`
`
`
`-—-——--————-m
`NC = Not Calculated
`
`Key Study Findings: In a 28-day subcutaneous toxicity study, neonatal/juvenile rats received
`palonosetron at doses of 0, 5, 15, and 25 mg/kg/day. The vehicle or drug solution was
`administered by the. subcutaneous route for 3] days, starting at day 4 postpartum. 1n the clinical
`setting, the intravenous route of administration will be used; however, given the small size of
`animals in the present study, the subcutaneous route was chosen. Rats (i.e., offspring) were killed
`and necropsied on day after the last treatment. Parental female rats received no treatment and
`were sacrificed following weaning of offspring. The no effect dose was 5 mg/kg/day. There was
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 67
`no treatment-related mortality. The incidences ofmale and female rats at 15 and 25 mg/kgday
`with an absent pupillary reflex on day 21 postpartum were increased as compared to controls.
`Eye opening was slightly delayed for rats at 15 and 25 mg/kg/day. Target organs (or tissues) of
`toxicity were injection sites, optic nerves, and kidneys. For male and female rats at 15 and 25
`mg/kg/day, histopathological changes at injection sites included mineralization, hemorrhage,
`acanthosis, dermatitis, and cellulitis. For male and female rats at 25 mg/ngday, the incidence of
`neuropathy in the optic nerves was increased. For male and female rats at 25 mg/kg/day, the
`incidence ofpelvic dilatation in the kidneys was increased. The incidences of focal nephropathy
`and papillitis were increased for female rats at 25 mg/kg/day. Hematology and clinical chemistry
`‘ parameters were not provided, although, it appears that blood was collected on day 30 of
`treatment.
`
`3. Subcutaneous 28-Dav Toxicitv Studv in Juvenile Rats with Palonosetron Hvdrochloride:
`
`(Study #PALO-OZ—OS; PV10001)
`
`Testing Laboratogy:
`
`\
`
`Dates of Stan and Completion of the studv: April 10, 2002 & December 5, 2002
`
`GLP # QAU Reguirements: Statement of compliance to "GLP regulations, 1999, "1999 #
`3106 was attached.
`
`Species and Strain: Cr12CDRBR VAF/Plus SD IGS BR VAF/PLUS strain neonate rats
`
`
`Batch #: TA/2002/163 (Batch #21000565)
`
`Methods: Sixty mated females were allowed to litter and 136 pups/sex were divided in to 4
`main groups (lZ/sex/group) and 4 satellite groups (22/sex/group). These were administered
`subcutaneous injection (between the shoulder blades) 0, 5, 15 or 25 mg/kg/day palonosetron (5
`mng) for 28 days (post-partum day 4 to day 34/35). The following table of sponsor (vol 58.1,
`pp 18 of 422) shows group size, doses and identification # of animals.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 68
`
`'
`
`1
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`I
`
`
`I DEE“;—
`7"" ”— I-I‘. mmber 01 animals I —l-«lcnulicnrion numbers
`I
`(Iimup
`(:I‘Ijlur I—"
`—’—' ‘ If"
`' _- I-——-—-
`(mg'kgflnx-I
`I
`—
`.‘
`_
`‘_‘-
`I“
`! Males-:I Females £__ MnIL-s
`_Il"emulcs
`I
`JIIE’i‘IL.
`
`
`I
`I Main
`I
`h
`i
`12
`I
`12
`I
`(rt-73
`I
`109-12!)
`I
`
`_
`:
`Salami:
`I—
`;
`IS7-l78
`I
`245-266
`I
`
`
`5
`73-8-1
`121.13:
`3
`.- Main
`I
`
`z 2
`1-
`i—-
`-
`
`Snicllirc I
`l mum)
`267-238
`I
`I
`‘3'" —_-I——_.
`_-
`_.__I__
`_
`—...._
`..__.'._____. _
`.
`
`I
`I2
`1:
`'
`saw.
`I
`133-144
`1
`I
`I Main _I
`]_
`-——l——
`.
`-~-—--
`5
`Yellow .
`.~
`
`I Satellite I
`I
`2:
`:2
`I
`arr—:2:
`|
`239-310
`I
`i_‘ -
`—'——-—-
`i
`-— -— -
`—— — ——-——— .—-——~ —.
`
`Main
`I
`'
`12
`.- r: _I
`07.103
`I
`145-156
`I
`i
`I
`I
`9 Satellite I PM i
`:2
`I
`:3
`i
`23:44
`I
`311-332
`1
`I
`- L— .—_1
`;
`:-_.-_
`__
`._
`....—:
`V
`
`
`I
`..
`..
`1
`_
`'
`- __ .- _ _
`
`
`
`-
`
`\\"
`
`ilc
`
`.
`
`'_ _.
`
`_
`
`-
`
`-
`
`(ireen
`
`<-
`
`.
`
`..
`
`-
`
`-
`
`..
`
`_
`
`-
`
`I
`l
`I
`'
`I
`_I
`
`_
`
`I
`
`(t
`
`5
`
`J
`
`Sponsor conducted this repeat study on the request ofthe Agency (letter January 31, 01 l) as the
`previous study (t — report #1063/18-D6154) was not complete and it lack the
`measurements of hematology and clinical chemistry parameters. The doses and the methods
`used in the present study were the same as used in the previous 28-day study in juvenile rats
`( ~ ~ report #1063/18-D6154).
`In brief, the study included the assessment ofth'e body
`weights changes, the developmental parameters of ear/eye opening (from day 3 to 6 for ear and
`from day 1 1 to 16 for eye opening), righting reflux (day 5), air righting reflex (three trials on day
`22), startle response (on day 15), pupillary light reflex and opthalmoscopy (on day 33 day of age)
`were also observed. The Approximately 0.5 ml of blood was collected from 4 satellite group
`from 3 pups/sex/time point on day l, 4 and 35/36 of dosing (i.e., postpartum day 4) at 0.5, l, 2
`and 4 hr after dosing for the estimation ofpalonosetron and, its metabolite RS 17825-007. At
`necropsy (day 35/36 of animal age), 0.5 ml the blood from the non-fasted main study groups for
`hematology and blood chemistry parameters. The tissues and organs from main study groups
`were the same as described the previous study. The microscopic examination was done on all
`tissues from control and high dose treatment groups ofmain study animals and, eyes and optic
`nerves from all the animals of all groups of the main study and, all tissues of animals from main
`study group dying or killed during the study and, all gross lesions from the main study groups
`animals.
`
`Results:
`
`a. Observed Effects: Two males (#67 and 72) and 1 female (#265) Thickening and scabies of
`the skin at the injection sites were seen in animals of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group. No other
`changes in the physical condition of the animals were observed.
`The percent animals with ears Open (day 5), startle response (day 15), eye opening (day 16) were
`100% among all the groups. The average day for opening the eyes were 14.9, 15.2, 15.0 and
`15.2, respectively in control and 3 treatment groups. The righting reflex on day 5 of observation,
`was 8.3% less in animals of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group than control group animals. The
`percent animals with eye open on day 14 were 22.2, 8.3, 16.7 and 16.7 in control and 3 treatment
`groups animals. The development parameters were similar in all study groups.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 69
`
`b. Mortality: Three animals were found dead during the study. These were 2 males in control
`group and 1 female of satellite group of5 mg/kg/day treatment group. Two males of control
`group and 1 female on5 mg/kg/day treatment group (satellite group) were sacrificed because of
`humane reasons.
`
`c. Bodv Weight/Food Consumption Changes: The mean body weight gain ofthe males and
`females included in treatment groups and control group were not statistically different during the
`preweaning period. The mean initial (day l) and final body weights (on postpartum day 20) of
`neonates of the control main study group during the pre-weaning period were males 7.7 g and
`46.4 g and, females 7.1 and 44.2 g, respectively. During post weaning period (postpartum day
`21 to 35), a retardation of 10.7 and 5.8% in the body weight gain of male and female animals
`included in 25 mg/kg/day treatment group was seen. On post weaning day 35, the bodyweights
`ofanimals ofmain study control and 3 treatment groups were 145.5, 143.8, 148.1 and 132.7 g
`for males and, 133.4, 138.5, 133.8 and 126.0 g for females, respectively.
`
`TABLE
`
`Table for Mean Wei ht () of rats durin the study
`IIIIIIIIIIIIIllflflflllflflflflflflillflflfliflfllllflfiflififll
`Pre-Weaning
`Postnatal Day 3 M 7.7
`F
`
`Postnatal Day 20 M
`F
`
`Day 35
`
`Post-Weaning
`Day 21
`
`.
`
`M
`
`d. Hematoloolv/Coagulation/Bone Marrow Changes: A slight decrease was seen in RBC
`count, hemoglobin and percent packed cell volume in treated animals. A dose related increase in
`total WBC counts in treated males (10.65, 11.02, 12.8 and 13.8X103ul) and females (9.87, 12.45,
`11.68 and 12.98 X103/ul) was also seen.
`
`e. Blood Chemistrvarinalvsis Changes: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were decreased
`(p<0.001) by 6.6, 18.0 and 24.5% in males and, 6.0, 24.7 and 21.7 in females of 5, 15 and 25
`mg/kg/day treatment groups. The albumin to globulins ratio was decreased in a dose related
`manner in males and females indicating the drug effect on liver. The serum low albumin and
`ALP values may be due to the inflammatory reactions caused by the compound.
`
`f. thsical Examination and Ophthalmic Test Changes: The abnormality of eye lens opacity
`and posterior synechia was seen in 1 out of 12 male pups and, the delay in development of
`unilateral lens suture line was obServed in 1 out of 12 female pups of 25 mg/kg/day treatment
`group. No optic nerve neuropathy was seen in the pups during the study.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 70
`
`g. Organ Weight Changes: The heart (p<0.01), liver and kidney (0.05) absolute weights were
`decreased1n males of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group. The relative weight of these organs to
`body weight was not affected The thymus and lung organ absolute weights were decreased
`(p<0.05 to 0001) among females of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group.
`
`Toxicokinetics: The subcutaneously administered compound was seen to attain the peak plasma
`levels within 0.5 to 1 hr ofits administration on day 4 and 30. The plasma peak levels on a
`steady state (AUCo. 11:) and the time for peak plasma concentration of the compound were
`similar1n males andfemales on day 4 and 35 as shown1n sponsor table 3 (scanned below).
`
`Table 3: Results [tom the non-compartments! analysis of plasma concentration-mne-
`dara (palanoselron).
`‘
`
`Day Group
`
`Dose
`(mg/kg)
`
`('1)
`
`C...
`109m“)
`
`AUCu
`(ng/mI-h)
`
`AUG...
`(nB/mLh)
`
`1,
`(M)
`
`n
`
`Iv,
`(h)
`
` 0.50
`
`1.00
`1.00
`
`355.04
`1415.35
`0.50
`050 147125
`0.50
`252.54
`
`334.37
`156425
`2333.35
`24520
`
`1.266 4'
`450.27 0.545
`1593.01
`1.078 0.643
`4
`2393.65 0.995 0.697
`4
`250.99
`1.590 0.410
`3
`
`359.59
`1539.32
`
`110425
`2220.54
`
`112.35 1.153 0.601 3|
`23141.70 0.896 0.774
`a
`
`Female
`
`4
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`15
`25
`
`0.50
`0.50
`0.50
`
`414.55
`931.11
`1680.31
`
`557.41
`1420.54
`2559.61
`
`50529 0.675 1.025
`1437.40 0.336 0.329
`3125.39 0.340
`1.033
`
`l
`=
`L
`
`35
`
`286.77 2293 0.302
`276.35
`249.01
`0.50
`5
`2
`1139.45 1241
`0.559
`1126.97
`945.93
`050
`15
`3
`1525.09
`1.134, 0.535
`1797.22
`1544.02
`1.00
`25
`4
`‘ Corresponds to the number ol points used in the hall-lite delenninetton.
`
`4
`4
`4
`
`2
`3
`3
`
`Table 4: Results from the non-compartments! analysis olplnsma concentration-time
`dam (Rs-1711250177).
`
`Sax
`
`1
`
`
`Day Group' 03.59" T._.. C...
`AUG...
`AUG“
`A.
`in
`n -
`11119419)
`01)
`(no/m1)
`(nelmI-h)
`("91"”)
`(m)
`(h)
`
`l
`
`02:17
`
`35.73
`
`0.564 0.302
`
`0.888
`
`1.038
`
`/
`
`
`wNNQUm
`humuum
`UUWUUU
`AWFJAUN
`
`
`25
`
`5
`
`1.00 33.53
`
`1.00
`
`17.93
`
`59:44
`
`3320
`
`‘ Corresponds to the number at points used in “he hall-tile deterrninatlon.
`
`The peak plasma concentration of the metabolite (RS-17825-1 87, with the following structure)
`was seen within 1 to 2 hr of the administration of the compound.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 7]
`
`RS- 178254137
`
`
`
`The toxicokinetic parameters of the metabolite were shown in sponsor table 4 (as scanned
`above).
`
`
`h. Gross Patholo v Findin s: An abnormal skin color was seen in 2 and 4 males and, 1 and 4
`females of 15 and 25 mgi’kgday treatment groups. The incidences of scales formation were 1
`and 7 among males and, 2 and 6 females of 15 and 25 mg/kg/day treatment groups. Abnormal
`size ovaries and uterus were seen in 2 females of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group.
`
`i. Histopatholog'ical Changes: Renal pelvic distension was present in 0 of 12, l of 1, 1 of2,
`and l of 12 males and, 0 of 12, 1 of 1,
`1 of2, and 3 of 12 females belonging to 0, 5, 15 and 25
`mg/kg/day treatment groups. The incidences ofrenal pelvis distension in animals died during
`the study were I of] and 1 out of2 males of5 and 15 mg/kg/day treatment groups. One of2
`females of 15 mg/kg/day treatment group died during the study. Extramedullary haemopoiesis in
`spleen of marked intensity was observed in 1 male and 5 females out of 12/sex of25 mg/kg/day
`treatment group. Slight to moderate intensity dermal acanthosis at the site of injection was
`observed in 4 of4 and 12 of 12 males and, 2 of2 and 6 of8 females belonging to 15 and 25
`mg/kg/day treatment groups. Dermal ulceration was seen in 50, 100 and 75% males and, 0, 50
`and 62.5% females of 5, 15 and 25 mg/kg/day treatment groups. Myofibre degeneration/
`pannicular necrosis of subcutaneous tissue from moderate to marked intensity was observed in
`50% and 83.3% males and, 50 and 100% females belonging to 15 and 25 mg/kg/day treatment
`groups. Optic nerve neuropathy was not seen in any of the study animals.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY .
`0N ORlGlNAL
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 72
`
`Histopatliological findings that were considered to be related to treatment were seen at the
`subcutaneous injecnon sites as tabulated below :
`I——'_—'—_—— _ —.
`
`E_
` l No Examined
`
`i Males
`
`
`
`l panrucular
`
`
`lluemorrliage/
`
`! congestion
`'
`-
`
`0
`'
`-
`.\l_\-'olibic
`.lpnnnnr:when]
`
`
`
`-necrosis
`Denna);
`
`
`Subcutaneous
`necrosis
`
`
`
` Dystrophic
`5 mineralisation
`
`
`
`In summary, subcutaneously administered palonosetron caused renal pelvic distension,
`extramedullary haemopoiesis of marked intensity in spleen and dermal reactions including
`myofibnl degeneration/necrosis of moderate to marked intensity in animals of 15 and 25
`mg/kg/day treatment groups. Eye lens opacity and structural abnormality of posterior synechia
`was seen in l of 12 male pups and, delay in development of lens suture line was seen in l of 12
`female pups of 25 mg/kg/day treatment group. No incidences of optic nerve degeneration were
`seen. A dose of 5 mg/kyday was a ‘highest tolerable dose’ and kidney, spleen and site of
`injection were the. target organs of toxicity.
`
`26-Week Chronic Intravenous Toxicitv Studv in Rats with 4 Week of Recovefl
`4.
`Period: (Study # 1063/1-D6154; PALO 99—08)
`
`Testing Laboratorv:
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 73
`GLP and QAU Reguirements: The study was conducted in compliance with GLP and QAU
`audits requirements (the certificate was not signed)
`
`Dates of Start and Completion of the Study: May 17, 1999 and January 12, 2000 (The date of
`completion of pathology not given)
`
`" with mean body weight of277.3
`.——-o
`Animals: Crl:CD(SD)IGSBR strain rats ‘
`to 289.7 g (males) and 197.8 to 205.8 g (females) were used in the study.
`
`Methods: Two hundred and sixty animals (l30/sex) were randomly divided in to 4 groups i.e.,
`30, 20, 20 and 30 animals/sex in 0, 2, 7 and 14/10 mg/kg/day palonosetron (B. #1308911/30893-
`P105; vol. 1 ml/kg) treatment groups, respectively. Ten animals of control and high dose
`treatment groups were reserved for the recovery period of 4 weeks to determine the reversibility
`oftreatment related effects.
`In addition, 10 rats/sex/group consisted of satellite treatment groups.
`The dose selection was based on a preliminary dose escalating toxicity study performed in 2
`groups of rats (5/sex/group) and these animals were given a dose of7 or 10 mg/kg/day for 7
`days. These doses were escalated to 14 and 20 mg/kg/day, respectively in these two groups on
`day 8. Uncoordinated movements were seen after 14 mg/kg/day dose from day 11. Based on
`this observation 3 dose of 10 mg/kg/day was selected as the dose for the present study.
`
`Group
`Number
`
`Description/Dose
`(mg/kg/day)- Main study
`Male
`Female
`
`Animals/group
`Satellite Study
`Male
`Female
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`
`Control
`Low
`lnterrnediate
`High
`
`0
`2
`7
`10
`
`20+ 10#
`20+10
`20
`20
`20
`20
`20+10# 20+10#
`
`-
`10
`10
`10
`
`-
`10
`10
`10
`
`-the dose levels are expressed in term of free base. A conversion factor (1.123) was applied to convert from the base
`to salt; # 10 animals/sex from the control and high dose groups maintained treatment free for 4 weeks following 26
`weeks of treatment.
`
`All animals were observed for the changes in the clinical signs, mortality, food consumption, and
`body weight changes. The ophthalmoscopic examination was done in animals of control and
`high dose treatment groups on week 25. Blood samples were collected on day 1, and on 15' day
`of week 5, 13 and 26. The blood samples from 3 animals/sex/satellite group of 10 mg/kg/day
`treatment group at 10, 30 min and 1, 2, 6 and 24 hr after dosing for toxicokinetic experiment.
`Blood samples for hematology and blood chemistry tests were drawn from 10 animals/main
`study treatment groups. Urine samples were collected from other 10 animals /sex/group (not
`used for blood parameters estimations) at week 12 and 25 and week 30 (afier recovery period).
`All animals of the study (including satellite group) were necropsied and examined visually. The
`organs and tissues of each of the animals were separated, cleaned, weighed and/or preserved for
`microscopic examination. The organsweighed were adrenals, brain, kidneys, liver, pituitary,
`testes/ovaries, prostate, spleen, thyroid/parathyroid and uterus. The organs fixed in formalin,
`methanol and Davidson’s stain before microscopic examination were adrenal, bone marrow
`
`

`

`NDA 21-372
`
`Page 74
`
`(femur), eye/optic nerve, zymbal glands, muscle Quad, skin and mammary glands, sciatic nerve,
`seminal vesicle, femur marrow and artificial surface, ileum, cecum, colon, rectum, uterus,
`prostate, urinary bladder, stemum+Marrow, testes+epididymedis, liverXZ, salivary glands,
`mesenteric/mandibular lymph nodes, spleen, thyroid/parathyroid, pancreas, duodenum, jejunum,
`spinal cord (cervical, thoracic, lumber), lungs, bronchi, kidneys, nasal turbinate, nasopharynx,
`esophagus, stomach, aorta, larynx, pituitary, ovaries, brain, heartX3, thymus, trachea and gross
`lesions.
`
`Results:
`
`a. Observed Effects: Four out of 10 animals included in 94 mg/kyday treatment group had
`convulsions on first day of treatment. Uncoordinated movements and/or reduced activity were
`seen in these animals immediately after dosing. Therefore the dose 14 mg/kg/day was reduced to
`10 mg/kg/day from study day 2.
`
`b. Monalig: Eight animals ofthe study died and these were 1 female belonging to control and 7
`animals of 14/10 mg/kg/day treatment group. The animal number, week of death and cements
`on each of the animals died, are shown in the following table (table taken from sponsor
`submission vol 1:], pp 050):
`
`Group Number Animal no/sex
`1
`125F
`4
`76m
`77M
`173F
`199F
`223M(S)
`229M(S)
`259F(S)
`
`(S) = satellite group animal
`
`Mortality Table
`Week of Death
`Comments
`30
`Died during bleed procedure
`14
`Found Dead post dose
`14
`Found dead post dose
`14
`Found dead post dosing.
`26
`Died dun'ng bleed procedure
`22
`Found Dead post dosing
`12
`Found dead prior to dosing
`23
`Found Dead post dosing
`
`Three animals (# 173, 77 and 76 died approximately 4 hr post dosing with no clinical signs. Animal # 223 showed convulsions
`before death. The other animals had no signs before deaths.
`
`C. Body Weight/Food Consumption/Water consumption: The animals included in 2, 7 and
`14/10 mg/kg/day treatment groups gained similar body weights. On week 26, the mean final
`weights were 517.6, 517.4, 522.1 and 502.1 g for males and 298.3, 301.4, 301.4 and 301.1 g for
`females included in 0, 2, 7 and 14/10 mg/kg/day treatment groups, respectively. On week 26,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket