throbber

`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`Study title:
`
`1C] 182,780: One Month Intramuscular Toxicity Study in Rats.
`
`Key study findings:
`0
`Females exhibit histological changes in the ovaries (absent or reduced corpora lutea, multiple
`follicular cysts, luteal cysts, hemorrhagic Graaftan follicles and hemorrhagic corpora lutea),
`uterus (atrophy), cervix (atrophy) and vagina (atrophy).
`0 There are no differences in the incidence or severity of the histological changes observed in
`rats administered ICI 182,780 alone or in combination with sulphone. These changes appear
`to be related to the anti-estrogenic activity of the compound.
`
`Study no:
`TAR/2972
`Volume #, and page #: N_000\2001-03-28\pharmtox\tox\Dose\ TAR/2972
`
`Conducting laboratory and location: AstraZeneca UK Limited Safety Assessment Alderley
`Alderley Park Macclesfield Cheshire SK10 4TG England
`Date of study initiation: April 21, 1999
`GLP compliance: Yes
`)
`QA report: yes (x) no (
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and % purity: Batch #. P/ 1465/28, P/ 1465/26, P/ 1465/29, 999% w/w
`Formulation/vehicle:
`
`
`Ingredients
`
`1031 182780
`ICI |82780 sulphone
`Poloxamer 407 USNF
`Ethanol 96% 85'
`Water for injectitm Ph Eur
`Propylmeglycol
`Formulation hatch reference
`
`Strength
`placelm
`% w’v
`
`:
`1.0
`100
`3.0
`w 100 %
`
`”465/28
`
`Strength
`2 % wa'v
`% w‘v
`
`2.0
`-
`I ’0
`'0'0
`o
`8-0
`‘°‘°°/°
`szsxzs
`
`Strength
`1.90 "A. Mi;
`% w‘v
`
`1.96
`0.04
`1.0
`10.0
`8.0
`moon/a
`P/l 465/29
`
`Methods: This study compares the toxicity of lCI 182,780 2% SA (short acting) formulation and
`a ICI 182,780 1.96% (with 0.04% sulphone) SA formulation administered
`intramuscularly to the rat once daily for 28 days. Note: The sulphone derivative is a
`degradation product of ICI 182,780 formulations and is a minor metabolite in the rat after
`N administration. The results of this study are intended to support the final specification
`for sulphone content in ICI 182,780 parenteral formulations. The dose level selected for
`the study of5 mg/kg/day (30 mg/m2) x 28 days = 140 mg/kg (840 mg/mz) is ~ 30x-(5x)
`the proposed human dose of 250 mg/30 days (4.17 mg/kg or 154.3 mg/mz).
`Dosing:
`Species/strain:
`#/sex/group or time point (main study):
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics:
`Age:
`Weight:
`Doses in administered units:
`
`Alpk: APfSD -Wistar derived rats
`10/sex/group
`3/sex/group
`37-41 days old
`127-217 g
`0, 5 mg/kg/d, and 5 mg/kg/d ICI
`18270 + 0.4 mg/ml sulphone. Daily
`x 28 days
`
`42
`
`

`

`NDA No.21-344
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD.
`
`Route and volume:
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Clinical signs:
`Body weights:
`
`Food consumption:
`Ophthalmoscopy:
`Hematology:
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`Urinalysis:
`Gross pathology:
`Organs weighed:
`
`Histopathology:
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`Results:
`
`Mortality:
`
`Clinical signs:
`
`Body weights:
`
`Food consumption:
`Ophthalmoscopy:
`Hematology:
`
`IM; 0. 025 ml/100 g
`
`Twice daily
`Day -7, pre- study, first day of dosing and then weekly for the
`remainder of the study.
`Daily
`Pre-study and week 4
`At scheduled necropsy. Blood samples for coagulation analyses
`were taken from designated 5/animals/group at scheduled
`necropsy (day 29)
`At scheduled necropsy (day 29)
`At scheduled necropsy (day 29)
`Day 29
`Adrenal glands, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs, ovaries,
`pituitary gland, prostate gland, spleen, testes (including
`epididymides), thymus and uterus.
`Day 29
`Pre-dose and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours on day 28. The AUC0_24
`of ICI 182,780 and the AUCo..2 of the circulating metabolites
`(ZM208,917 sulphone and ZM366,472 17— ketone) for the male
`and female rats were compared within and between each dose
`group.
`
`One 0‘ animal dosed 5 mg kg ICI 182,780 with Sulphone, from
`the pharmacokinetic sub- group, died (day 5) as the result of an
`accident. The Sponsor did not indicate the nature of the
`accident. Necropsy findings included minimal focal acute
`myositis and minimal multifocal adjacent tissue acute
`inflammatory cell infiltration at the injection site. Also, mild
`unilateral hydronephrosis and minimal focal cortical tubular
`basophilia
`
`Clinical observations included swelling of the hind limbs with
`associated transient limping in several animals in all groups
`including controls from day 3 to 24. The Sponsor considers this
`effect a consequence of exposure to the excipients and not ICI
`182,780.
`
`Males from both groups dosed with ICI 182,780 showed an
`approximate 10% body weight gain reduction when compared
`to control group.
`i
`All females gained weight at a similar rate throughout the
`dosing period.
`Unremarkable (UR)
`UR
`
`Values represent percent change from control.
`
`43
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`Hemoglobin (g/dl)
`RBC (x 10‘2/1)
`Reticulocytes (%)
`Hematocrit (l/l)
`MCV (n)
`MCH (pg)
`Platelets (109/1)
`WBC (109/1)
`
`T9'
`T14.
`T35‘
`T19
`Group Il-drug + sulphone; Group Ill-drug alone
`‘P<0.05
`
`.
`
`Values represent ercent Chan e fiom control.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Glucose (mmoll)
`Urea (mmol/l)
`'
`
`T. calcium (mmol/l)
`ALP (TU/l)
`Triglycerides
`mmon
`
`IIIA
`
`Control
`
`11
`
`Ill
`
`llA
`ilo
`
`Control
`14.6
`6.3
`30
`l
`
`3.28
`344
`1.05
`
`
`Group ll-drug + sulphone; Group Ill—drug alone
`‘P<0.05
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`
`Urinalysis:
`Organ weights:
`
`UR
`At necropsy, there was a decrease in median body weight of
`male rats in Group Il(11%) and in Group III (16%) given ICI
`182,780. Thus, some absolute organ weights for male rats in
`these groups showed significant differences from the control
`values. The Sponsor considers these changes to be of no
`toxicological importance.
`Median relative uterine weight was decreased by 79% for
`females in Group H and 1]] given ICI 182,780.
`
`Gross pathology:
`
`
`
`
`Group ll-drug + sulphone; Group Ill-drug alone
`
`
`
`
`Histopathology:
`
`
`
`
`——-I_-E_
`
`
`__——
`
`
`Ovaries
`
`
`
`No corporea lutea
`Reduced corporea lutea
`Follicular Cysts
`
`
`Luteal Cysts
`
`
`Hemorrhagic Corporea Lutea
`
`
`Hemorrha_'c Graafian follicles
`Uterus: Severe Atrophy
`
`Vagina: Epithelial Severe Atrophy
`Estrus
`
`
`
`
`
`_
`0/10
`5/10
`
`10/ l 0
`0/10
`
`
`10/10
`9/9
`
`0/9
`
`
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD.
`NDA No.21-344
`
`Injection site-acute myositis
`
`Adjacent tissue acute inflammatory cell
`infiltration
`
`Sciatic nerve-adjacent acue inflammatory
`cell infiltration
`
`5/10
`
`5/10
`
`5/10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_—-_-E_
`
`Injection site-acute myositis
`Adjacent tissue acute inflammatory cell
`infiltration
`
`3/10
`1/10
`
`4/10
`4/10
`
`5/10
`5/10
`
`cell infiltration
`
`Group ll-drug + sulphone; Group Ill-drug alone
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`ZM 36 ,472'
`Group
`Grou
`11‘
`ll]
`
`Group
`11]
`
`.
`-IEIlm-IEI 3-0
`.
`
`‘with 0.04% sulphone; ” 1C1 182.780 was measured 0-24 and ZM 208.917 and ZM 366,472
`were measured 0-12
`
`" ZM208,917 is a sulphone metabolite
`B ZM366,472 is a 17-ketone metabolite only demonstrated in females.
`
`0 There was no difference in exposure to ICI 182,780 between the sexes or between the groups
`given lCI 182,780 alone or in combination with sulphone.
`0 Absorption appeared faster in animals given ICI 182,780 and sulphone compared to
`administration of the drug alone. That is, on day 28, Cmax for ICI 182,780 occurred at 1 h
`post—dose (tmax) for Group H (drug + sulphone) compared to 3 h post-dose for Group 1]] (drug
`alone).
`0 Exposure to ZM208,9] 7 (sulphone metabolite) was slightly greater in females compared to
`males (Group II and HI : 62% and 59%, respectively).
`0 Exposure to ZM208,917 (sulphone metabolite) was approximately 70% greater in animals
`given ICI 182,780 in combination with sulphone than in animals given ICI 182,780 alone.
`0 There was a significant difference between the sexes in the AUsz of ZM366,472 (ketone
`metabolite) with male rats showing no systemic exposure. However, there was no difference
`between the AUCO- .2 of ZM366,472 of Groups H and III females.
`
`Summary of individual study findings:
`Study TAR/2972 compares the toxicity of the ICI 182,780 formulation (2% ICI 182,780-SA) and
`a ICI 182,780 formulation (SA) spiked with sulphone (1.96% ICI 182,780 with 0.04% sulphone),
`when administered intramuscularly to the rat once daily for 28 days. The sulphone derivative is
`the main degradation product of ICI 182,780 formulations and is a minor metabolite in the rat.
`
`Pharrnacokinetic monitoring demonstrated no difference in exposure to ICI 182,780 between the
`sexes or between the groups given ICl 182,780 alone or in combination with sulphone. Exposure
`to ZM208,917 (sulphone metabolite) was greater in females compared to males and ~ 70%
`
`45
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`greater in animals given ICI 182,780 in combination with sulphone than in animals given ICI
`182,780 alone (the increase in exposure probably due to administered ZM208,917). Exposure to
`ZM366,472 (ketone matebolite) was observed only in females.
`
`Changes seen in animals given ICI 182,780 (alone or in combination with sulphone) were related
`to the anti-estrogenic activity of the compound. The changes seen included a 10% reduction in
`body weight gain in males and histological changes in the ovaries (absent or reduced corpora
`lutea, multiple follicular cysts, luteal cysts, hemorrhagic Graafian follicles and hemorrhagic
`corpora lutea), uterus (atrophy), cervix (atrophy) and vagina (atrophy). There were no differences
`in the incidence or severity of histological changes between the two groups.
`
`Study title:
`RATS.
`
`ICI 182,780 : SIX MONTH INTRAMUSCULAR TOXICITY STUDY IN
`'
`
`Key study findings:
`0 Atrophy of the female reproductive tract; a specific constellation of ovarian alterations with
`increased late stage and cystic Graafian follicles, loss of mature corpora lutea and reduced
`vacuolation of the interstitial cells.
`
`0 A loss of spermatozoa from the seminiferous tubules with an accompanying dilatation,
`seminiferous tubular atrophy with some associated degenerative changes in the epididymides.
`0 Conversion of specific tissues in females to the morphology normally seen in males including
`mammary gland structure, splenic hemosiderosis, pituitary gonadotroph vacuolation and
`reduced hair loss and an earlier appearance of adrenal cortical congestion with hemocyst
`formation.
`
`TPR/2042.
`Study no:
`Volume #, and page #: N_000\2001-03-28\pharrntox\tox\Dose\ TAR/2972\TPR/2042.
`Conducting laboratory and location: ICI Pharmaceuticals Safety of Medicines Department
`Alderley Park Macclesfield Cheshire England
`Date of study initiation: April 2, 1992
`GLP compliance: Yes
`QA report: yes (x) no ( )
`Drug, lot #, and % purity: ICI 182,780; ADM 44010/89; 98.8%
`Formulation/vehicle: Sustained release LA formulation
`
`Ingredients
`1C1 182,780
`Ethanol 96% v/v
`
`Benzyl Alcohol
`Benzyl Benzoate
`Castor Oil
`Batch number
`
`Strength w/v%
`5.0
`10.0
`
`Placebo w/v"/.
`0
`10.0
`
`10.0
`15.0
`To 100
`PH/6731/41
`
`10.0
`15.0
`To 100
`PH/6731/40
`
`ADM 48026/90
`
`Analytical Number
`
`ADM 48027/90
`
`Methods:
`
`Dosing:
`Species/strain:
`
`CR] :(WDBR Wistar rats
`
`46
`
`

`

`Reviewer Lilliam A Rosario Ph D
`.
`.
`,
`.
`
`.
`
`NDANo.2l-344
`
`#/sex/group or time point (main study):
`Satellite groups used for recovery:
`
`20/sex/group
`lO/sex/vehicle control or 10
`
`mg/rat/30 days ICI 182,780
`retained for a 19/20 week
`
`withdrawal period after the 6th
`dose.
`
`Satellite groups used for PK:
`Age:
`Weight:
`Doses:
`
`5/sex/time point
`36—43 days old
`110-199 g
`0 (saline and vehicle), 15 mg/kg/3O
`days, 10 mg/rat/30 days or 10
`mg/rat/15 days.
`0 All main test animals received 7 doses at 30 day intervals of ICI 182,780 or control
`formulation, except Group V which received 13 doses at 15 day intervals. Animals
`were observed for at least 7 days prior to necropsy.
`0 Animals in withdrawal groups received 6 doses of ICI 182,780 or control formulation,
`at 30 day intervals and were observed for 19 or 20 weeks after cessation of
`dosing/before necropsy.
`0 On day 61, 5 male rats from Group III were erroneously dosed with the vehicle
`control. These animals were allowed to recover and then correctly dosed on day 64,
`giving inter-dose periods of 33 days before and 27 days after this dose. This error is
`not considered to have compromised the study.
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate:
`
`IM using a plastic syringe and a
`sterile needle 25G x 16 mm; 0.2
`ml/rat for Groups I, 11, IV and V
`and 0.03 ml/l 00 g body weight for
`Group III.
`
`Dose Levels
`1C! 162, 780
`
`0 lg/rat/JO days
`vehicle control
`
`0 I‘lrlz/BO days
`saline control
`
`Hain test
`
`Vithdr-vcl
`
`20 H, 20 F
`
`30 H, 30 F
`
`20 H, 20 F 10 H, 10 F
`
`15 Ig/kg/BO days
`
`20 H, 20 F
`
`0 H,
`
`O F
`
`10 .g/nt/ao days
`
`30 n. so 1:
`
`10 lg/xnt/IS days
`
`IO H, )0 F
`
`0 H,
`
`0 T
`
`Note: The dose of 15 mg/kg/30 d was chosen as a dose which could be administered once a month for 6 months within the
`constraint of the maximum permitted dose volume (0.1 ml/sitetn 2 sites). The 10 mg/rat dose was set to maximize exposure of
`the rats with doses at the limit volume every 30 or 15 days
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Clinical signs:
`Body weights:
`
`Food consumption:
`
`Twice daily
`Day -7 and -2 pre-study, on the first day of dosing, then weekly
`to week 13 and then monthly for the remainder of the study.
`Recorded 7 days pre—study, then weekly to week 13, and
`monthly for the remainder of the study.
`
`47
`
`

`

`NDA No.2 l -344
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD.
`
`Ophthalmoscopy:
`
`Hematology:
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`
`Urinalysis:
`
`Gross pathology:
`Organs weighed:
`
`Histopathology:
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`Results:
`
`Mortality:
`
`Clinical signs:
`
`Body weights:
`
`Pre-study and all group I, l], and V animals in the main study
`were also examined during weeks 14 and 26 of the study
`Weeks 13 and 24 of dosing and from the withdrawal animals
`on week 40.
`
`Weeks 13 and 24 of dosing and from the withdrawal animals
`on week 40.
`
`Weeks 13 and 24 of dosing and from the withdrawal animals
`on week 40.
`
`Main group: week 27-29; withdrawal: week 46-47
`adrenal glands, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, ovaries, pituitary
`gland, prostate gland, spleen, testes (including epididymides)
`and uterus.
`
`Main group: week 27-29; withdrawal: week 46-47
`Samples were taken 3, 7 and 24 h after the first dose and on
`days 4, 7, 11, 16, 21, 25 and 30. In addition, samples were
`taken 3 and 24 hours after the second dose from rats in Group
`V. Samples were also taken after the sixth (Groups HI and IV)
`and eleventh/twelfth (Group V) dose at the same time intervals
`given for the first and second dose above.
`
`There were two premature sacrifices during the study, M
`400826 (vehicle control) and F 400775 (10 mg/rat/30 days) due
`to broken teeth and body weight loss.
`Bruising around the injection site was observed in one o'
`(vehicle control).
`
`
`Cumulative Bod
`Wt. Gains ;
`
`
` - Females
`
`Week
`Vehicle
`15
`10
`10
`Vehicle
`15
`10
`10
`- rug/kg!
`mg/rat/
`mg/rat/ - m g!
`
`mg/rat/
`
`days
`30da s
`lSda s
`dn 5
`30 da 5
`lSda s
`__-__—_mm
`-_—__—_I_IIE-
`"WE-IE!!-
`_—M
`—-_-_-E_-—
`_m-—IMI__-_
`MEN-___-
`_Im-m-m—___
`mum—__—
`“__EEIIEEI_—__
`Il-——__—-_—
`”Em—__-
`-—_-_____
`mum-___—
`__m——__—_
`
`“MIMI!“ 417
`412
`* p<0.05, "‘p<0.01,‘”‘“‘p<0.00l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mg/rat/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`48
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`0 Female rats given 15 mg/kg/30 days showed impaired growth throughout the study with
`a cumulative gain over the 25 week measurement period of 81% of control value.
`Females given 10 mg/rat, at 30 or 15 day intervals, showed impaired growth over the
`study (cumulative gains of 87 and 92% of controls).
`0 Male rats given ICI 182,780 showed a slight impairment of growth up to 4 weeks after
`the first dose compared to controls.
`0 During the withdrawal phase male rats previously given 10 mg/rat/30 days gained less
`weight than the vehicle controls (gain between weeks 25—41 ~ 85% of control) while
`females from this group showed similar growth to vehicle controls.
`
`Food consumption:
`0 Male rats given ICI 182,780 ate similar amounts of food to controls during the dosing
`period. On weeks 2 and 3, male rats given 10 mg/rat (at both 15 and 30 day intervals)
`had significantly lower (4-6%) group mean food consumption values compared to
`controls.
`
`0 Female rats given ICI 182,780 ate less food (9-15%) than controls during the dosing
`period. For rats given 15 mg/kg/30 days and 10 mg/rat/30 days, this effect began in
`week one and continued throughout the dosing period. Females given 10 mg/rat/15 days
`also had lower (9%) group mean food consumption from week 2 to week 8, after which
`time it was comparable to the control animals.
`0 During the withdrawal phase the food consumption of animals previously given 10
`mg/rat/30 days (males and females) was lower than that of the control animals.
`Ophthalmosc0py:
`UR
`
`10m.m115d
`10mm/30a
`1—-m-m=m-
`— “—-_ F “u“
`Hemoglobin (g/dl)
`13
`15.46
`14.25
`14.91.
`l5.06“‘
`14.55m
`15.24”.
`14.73”
`15.27m
`24
`15.13
`14.24
`14.09m
`14.97"
`14.25m
`15.82‘”
`I4.58'
`15"
`13
`8.94
`7.32
`13.57.
`23.40m
`8.41‘”
`24
`9.14
`8.04
`8.58"
`8.]79
`8.16
`13
`0.4480
`0.411
`0.4296"
`24
`0.4695
`0.429
`0.4360'“
`
`13.51m
`
`8.64‘"
`
`8.63”
`
`0.4307
`
`0.4100m
`
`0.4534“
`
`0.4220m
`
`0.4300
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hematolo 3 :
`
`RBC (x10 l1)
`
`Hemalocn't (V1)
`
`Recov
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hemoglobin (g/dl)
`
`RBC(x10 ll)
`
`
` Hematocril (V1)
`
`
`
`- p<0.05, "p<0.01,"'p<0.001
`
`“u“
`15.472
`14.102
`14.55m
`15.240m
`15.300
`14.383
`14.25m
`15.269
`8.902
`7.83
`8.48"
`8.48“
`9.146
`8.229
`8.51‘”
`8.486
`.4070
`.44 94
`0.4150‘”
`.4320“
`.4629
`.4343
`0.4160‘”
`.4629
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`24
`13
`24
`13
`24
`
`0 Males given ICI 182,780 showed lower hemoglobin (4-7%), hematocn't (4-11%), and
`RBC (4-7%) values compared to vehicle controls. Decreases in RBC counts may be
`suggestive of hemolysis unrelated to vehicle.
`0 Female rats given lCI 182,780 showed higher hemoglobin (5-1 1%) concentrations
`compared to controls at both time-points in all dose groups. At week 13, this was
`associated with an increase (~8%) in red blood cell count however, at week 24, this
`increase was only observed in rats given 10 mg/rat/30 days (17%).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`49
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`0 The same pattern of changes was observed in male and female rats in the recovery group.
`However, it is noteworthy that the values for 6‘s in the main test (10 mg/rat/30 days) and
`withdrawal group (10 mg/rat/30 days) are identical.
`
`Clinical chemist
`
`15m k 30d
`
`roman/30d
`
`10m rat/15d
`
`Total protein (g/l)
`
`Albumin (g/l)
`
`Alkaline
`hos hatase (lU/l
`Calcium (mmol/l)
`
`
`
`-_—__—_-I--l-
`13
`72
`70.10
`69.60
`6360’”
`68.5'
`65.30‘“
`71
`65.6"
`24
`76.34
`75.90
`73.50‘
`69‘“
`73.80
`69.80‘”
`74.7
`68.4‘“&
`13
`35.8
`33.90
`32.6‘
`32’”
`32.8
`33.1‘”
`33.7
`32.7‘”
`24
`35.24
`38.1
`34.1
`3390‘”
`34.2
`34.6‘”
`35
`33.5‘”&
`13
`245.9
`194.6
`236.4
`234.8‘
`285.7'
`247.4"
`250.2
`266.9‘“
`24
`248.6
`166.6
`233.6
`210.9‘
`265.6
`200.3
`231.2
`230.3“&
`13
`2.644
`2.669
`2.676
`2.548"
`2.643
`2.584’
`2.558‘
`2.508'”
`24
`2.773
`2.775
`2.727
`2.624‘”
`2.725
`2.596‘”
`2.767
`2.60"‘&
`13
`2.34
`1.97
`2.07
`1.95
`1.80“
`1.91
`1.66‘”
`1.97
`24
`2.908
`2.43
`2.38‘
`2.03
`2.13"
`1.92‘
`2.140”
`2.05
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0.986
`0.905”
`
`1.262
`1.542
`
`
`
`0.837'
`0.990‘
`
`
`
`
`
`1.476
`1.510
`
`0.813‘
`0.819“&
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cholesterol
`(mmol/l
`1.537
`1.218
`1.624
`13
`Triglycerides
`1.355
`1.480
`1.651
`24
`(mm/1)
`p<0.05, “p<0.01,”‘p<0.001, &=continues into the withdrawal period
`0 Female rats given ICI 182,780 had lower plasma total protein (16-10%) and albumin
`concentrations (14-12%) and higher alkaline phosphatase activities (TZl-38%) compared to
`controls. These differences were still apparent at the end of the withdrawal period suggesting
`that full recovery had not occurred. According to the Sponsor, the lower plasma total protein
`and albumin concentrations may be attributed to the anti-estrogenic effect of the drug in the
`liver since protein synthesis is partially regulated by estrogens. The higher alkaline
`phosphatase activities may be a result of the removal of estrogen suppression allowing
`elevation to levels associated with males.
`
`0 Lower (5-7%) total calcium values than controls were observed in all females given ICI
`182,780 and these small differences are probably related to the reduction in plasma
`albumin/total protein, which serve as carrier proteins for the calcium.
`0 Males given 1C1 182,780 exhibited lower (1 8-29%) cholesterol concentrations than controls.
`At week 24, the values were similar to those observed in control females.
`
`0 Females given ICI 182,780 also showed lower (19-45%) triglyceride values than controls in
`weeks 13 and 24 and at the end of the withdrawal period this difference was still apparent
`between control and rats previously given 10 mg/rat/30 days.
`
`Urinal sis:
`
`
`
`-- Vehicle
`15 m
`. 30 d
`_-III-———-Z--I--_
`77.4‘(sz)
`37.5
`43.2( 43%)
`93.6'(T3x)
`70.3(T2x)
`102.4‘(T3x)
`43.2(T43%)
`
`
`15.3
`36.2
`94.9” T6x
`60 T4):
`38.4 T3):
`32
`52.2. T3x
`
`
`
`
`50
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`Spleen (l)
`
`0.95“
`
`C
`0.56”
`
`0.963"
`
`0.629‘
`
`0.976‘
`
`0.625“
`
`1.068
`
`.745
`
`1.028
`
`.685
`
`Liver (l)
`
`22.82
`
`12.39
`
`21.63
`
`22.16
`
`21.21
`
`10.83“
`.‘
`
`23.80
`
`12.39
`
`20.48
`
`12.59
`
`
`
`
`
` Utems (i)
`
`0.1205
`0.086’
`0.148‘
`I’
`.l&
`.‘
`
`Adrenals
`005
`.087
`.053
`.087
`054
`.095
`.052
`.097
`.0721
`.0782
`.0620
`.1 121'
`
`Pituitary (i)
`0.013
`0.015
`0.0113
`0.0112
`0.012
`0.0106
`0.0112
`0.0103
`.0136
`.0174
`.0129
`.0148
`
`
`
`fit.
`ti.
`3’
`t..
`ti!
`’0‘
`‘p<0.05, "p<0.0| ,"“p<0.001 , &= trend continues into the recovery period
`
`
`
`
`
`0.539
`
`53 9a
`
`
`
`Gross pathology:
`
`Compared to controls, changes included a reduction in size of
`the female reproductive tract, changes in the size, constituency
`or color of the ovaries and testes, and a lower incidence of hair
`loss in the females that approximated to that observed in the
`males. The majority of these changes were also observed at
`termination of the withdrawal stud .
`
`_ Males n=20
`Females n=20
`vehicle
`15
`10
`10
`15
`10
`10
`
`mg/kg/
`mg/rat/
`mg/rat/
`mg/kg/
`myrat/
`mg/rat/
`30 min
`30 da
`15 da
`30 min
`30 da
`15 da
`
`___—___nn
`___—_—-_-_m-—
`——————m--_-_
`___—_“__—
`___-___“—
`”nu-___-
`”___-___—
`mun-"___—
`mum—__—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`___-_u—_-—
`
`
`
`a8 IOG.
`
`
`—----
`
`mg/rat/
`30d
`
`mg/rat/
`30d
`
`comosition
`
`___-n
`___—l-
`___" 3
`_——n-E-
`___-‘-
`Emu—m
`-—_-__—
`___--
`___-__—
`___—_—
`
`
`F
`2/20
`
`20/20
`
`10m_ rat/15d
`
`5/20
`
`I!
`
`18/20
`
`5]
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21—344
`
`11/20
`
`6/20
`
`2/20
`
`0/20
`
`0/14
`
`0/20
`
`6/20
`
`4/20
`
`- - -
`0/20 - 20/20 - 20/20 - 20/20
`
`
`
`0/20
`
`mild
`
`9/20
`
`
`
`1/20
`
`mild
`
`4/20
`
`0/1 1
`
`4/20
`
`mild
`
`
`
`epididymides
`ductal eith. microc stic
`reduced/
`loss of s-ermatozoa
`
`male like mammary
`
`1m
`ovaryreduced
`
`interstitial cell
`vacuolation
`
`follicles
`
`co oralutea
`
`pituitary pars distalis
`
`vacuolation/foaminess
`
`of cells
`
`testes seminiferous
`tubular atrophy
`
`loss of spermatozoa
`with tubular dilation
`
`uterus atrophy
`
`vagina atrophy
`
`injection site cysts
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15/20
`
`0/19
`
`0/20
`
`0/20
`
`1/20
`
`4/20
`
`13/20
`
`5/20
`
`- - -
`
`5/20 (3
`severe, 2
`min-mild
`6/20
`(2 mod, 4
`min—mild
`
`9/20
`(8 severe,
`1 mod
`6/20
`(3 mod, 3
`min-mild
`
`5/20
`(4 severe,
`1 mod
`l0/20
`(5 mod, 5
`min-mild
`
`0/20 - 20/20 - 20/20 - 20/20
`oo.
`38
`3388
`20/20
`20/20
`mod
`
`20/20
`
`0/20
`
`3/20 mild
`
`2/20 min
`5/20 mild
`
`5/20 mild
`1 1/20
`mod
`
`
`
`3/20 min
`‘
`2/20 min
`myocyte necrosis
`
`
`inflammation
`14/20
`18/20
`14/20
`
`
`
`'
`'
`mild
`'
`'
`mild
`mild
`
`
`
`2/20 mod
`1/20 mod
`
`
`
`Histohatholo in Withdrawal Grou.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Recove
`adrenal cortical
`con_estion/hemoc sts
`reduction}
`loss of s ermatozoa
`cervix atroh
`
`mammary gland
`_ladular vauolation
`ovary reduced
`interstitial cell
`vacuolation
`
`ovary reduced/loss of
`mature co nora lutea
`inc. later sta_e follicles
`pituitary pars distalis
`vacuolation
`seminiferous tubular
`mineralization
`seminiferous tubular
`atrophy
`
`loss of s-ennatozoa
`
`1/10
`
`1/9
`
`
`
`6/10
`
`3/9
`
`0/10
`
`0/10
`
`0/10
`O/IO
`
`
`
`
`
`10m rat/30 d
`F
`7/ l 0
`
`0/10
`
`3/10
`
`0/10
`
`6/10 mild
`6/10
`
`9/10
`
`5/10
`
`3/l0
`2/10
`
`3/10
`
`5/10
`(4 severe,
`1 mild
`2/10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`52
`
`

`

`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD.
`NDA No.21-344
`
`0/10
`
`0/10
`2/10
`
`10/10
`mild
`8/10 mild
`8/10
`
`6/10
`
`utuerus atrophy
`
`va_inal atroh
`
`site
`
`
`
`O
`
`with some dilation of
`
`seminiferous tubules
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9/10 mild
`6/10mi1d
`5/10mi1d
`4/10mi1d
`2/10mod
`2/20mod
`l/lOmod
`
`In animals of all groups, changes at the injection sites included moderate cyst formation
`around the deposited material with mild inflammation. Rats given 10 mg/rat/ 15 days, by
`subjective assessment, appeared to show a greater number of identical cysts as a result of
`more frequent intramuscular administration. Following the withdrawal period, cysts were still
`present at the injection sites but the cysts appeared slightly more fibrous with evidence of
`resolution of the inflammation.
`
`0
`
`In all females given ICI 182,780, there was a diffuse atrophy of the uterus, cervix, and vagina
`with a loss of normal cyclical estrous activity. In the ovaries, there was an increase in the
`number of later stage Graafian follicles (some cystic and others showed an apparent
`anovulatory leuteinization). A reduction in the number, or loss of mature corpora lutea and a
`loss of the normal ovarian interstitial cell vacuolation also occurred. These changes persisted
`to termination of the withdrawal study, although there was a decrease in the number of
`animals with increased numbers of later stage/cystic follicles.
`0 A proportion of males from all groups given ICI 182,780 showed a unilateral or bilateral
`reduction in numbers of mature spermatozoa within the seminiferous tubules with an
`accompanying dilatation. Also, a significant increase in incidence of multifocal or diffuse
`atrophy of the seminiferous tubules occurred. Microcystic degeneration of the epithelium of
`epididymal ducts was common in these rats. Changes in the testes and epididymides also
`persisted to termination of the withdrawal study.
`0 Conversion of specific tissues in females to the morphology seen in males (loss of sexual
`dimorphism) including mammary gland structure, splenic hemosiderosis, pituitary
`gonadotrOph vacuolation and reduced hair loss, and an earlier appearance of adrenal cortical
`congestion with hemocyst formation was observed in animals receiving ICI 182,780.
`0 At the end of the withdrawal period, drug—treated females showed a higher incidence of
`microvacuolation of the mammary glandular epithelium even though general mammary gland
`morphology had returned to the normal state, Also, the increased incidence of pituitary
`gonadotroph vacuolation persisted in the withdrawal animals. Although there were no
`histological differences between the control and closed withdrawal group adrenal glands, the
`increased mean adrenal weight for the high dose group may indicate a persistent increased
`severity of adrenal cortical congesion with hemocyst. The lowering incidence of splenic
`haemosiderin deposition (approximating males) did not appear to persist to termination of the
`withdrawal study.
`
`53
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21—344
`
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`The following table shows the ~ actual dose (mg/kg) administered to Groups IV (10
`mg/rat/30days) and Groua V 10 m rat/15 da 5
`
`
`Female
`
`
`w2 A09V
`
`dose
`
`dose
`
`dose
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`
`
`wwmnwwmm
`
`N
`_N\lN
`
`dose
`
`lSda s
`
`-_
`
`_- \lM
`
`_‘ \J\l
`U! \J
`....
`>— 1..)
`
`
`
`
`30:11! 5 30da'515davslSda s 30da 5 30112 5
`lSda s
`m— m —-
`\l
`
`4 —m
`_ as
`256
`MNv.0
`33#0
`
`
`
`0
`
`0
`
`It is noteworthy that as body weight increases (~2-3 fold) with time, the actual dose
`administered decreases in both male and female rats.
`
`Since females have lower (~30%) body weights compared to male rats, the actual dose
`administered to female rats is thus greater than males.
`
`Serum Concentration 11 ;
`mm man-.-
`-I1E_———-_—
`l-—— 15.501152
`_ 49.91513
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l-_—
`16.4:2.69
`I--——— _—_
`I-__
`_——_ l3.4:t2.37 I_——
`n-——
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Group
`
`m I
`
`momma/sod)
`I-l-I-
`
`
`
`m—nnnnnnnnnnnnnn II
`n
`372 88.3 208
`56.3 60.2 94.5 125194 70.2 129 94.8 132
`105
`
`ME“!!! . .3 H“ m
`
`AUC‘(ng‘d/ml)
`326
`719
`638 1235-1352-1317-1931
`1684
`—n 5.4 III-1m 5-63 9-86 man-I-
`-
`
`# 1.13 = 3 h afler dosing; 1.30 = 7 h after dosing
`‘AUC in the dosing interval: 0-30 d for groups Ill and IV; 0.16 d for group V.
`0 There was a significant difference between the sexes in serum ICI 182,780
`concentrations, Cm“, and AUC. The Sponsor attributes these differences to the lower
`body weight of female rats compared to male rats, given a fixed dose (10 myrat).
`
`
`m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`54
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`0
`
`When body weight was taken into account, however, there was still a trend towards
`higher exposure in female rats.
`Tmax showed considerable variability occurring between 3 h (day 1.13) and 11 days
`after dosing. Following the peak, the serum ICI 182,780 concentrations declined
`slowly following the first and sixth doses for rats given 15 mg/kg/30 days and 10
`mg/rat/3O days and the first and twelfth doses for rats given 10 mg/rat/ 15 days. The
`decline was slower following the higher dose and more frequent dosing interval
`(Groups IV and V respectively)
`0 The group mean AUC in the dosing interval 0 — 30 days showed a proportional
`increase with dose.
`
`0 Following the 6th (or 12th) dose, AUC values were higher in both males and females
`compared to the first dose for Groups 1]] and V. This trend was, however, reversed in
`Group IV, where AUC values following the sixth dose were lower than those
`following the first dose. The reason for this difference is unclear.
`
`Summary of individual study findings:
`Impairment of growth in females at all doses accompanied by lower food intake. Slightly higher
`red blood cell counts and mean cell hemoglobin concentrations in females at all doses
`(reversible). Lower plasma total protein, albumin, triglycerides and calcium, and higher alkaline
`phosphatase activity in females at all doses.
`
`Histologically in rats at all doses: changes at the injection sites included moderate cyst formation
`around the deposited material with mild inflammation still present by the end of the recovery.
`Also, atrophy of the female reproductive tract; a constellation of ovarian alterations with
`increased late stage and cystic Graafian follicles, loss of mature corpora lutea and reduced
`vacuolation of the interstitial cells. Conversion of specific tissues in females to the morphology
`normally seen in males including mammary gland structure, splenic hemosiderosis, pituitary
`gonadotroph vacuolation and reduced hair loss and an earlier appearance of adrenal cortical
`congestion with hemocyst formation. A loss of spermatozoa from the seminiferous tubules with
`an accompanying dilatation, seminiferous tubular atrophy with some associated degenerative
`changes in the epididymides. Decreased weights of spleens, pituitary glands and, in females only,
`livers, which were unaccompanied by overt toxicological changes. Atrophy of the cervix, uterus,
`vagina, as well as, ovarian changes showed evidence of reversibility but not complete recovery at
`the end of the withdrawal period. Similarly, reduction/loss of spermatozoa and seminiferous
`tubular mineralization and atrophy were still present in male rats.
`
`55
`
`

`

`
`
` Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario PhD. NDA No.21-344
`
`Study title:
`
`ICI 182,780 : ONE MONTH TOXICITY STUDY IN DOGS.
`
`Key study findings:
`0 Repeated daily dosing over 4 weeks resulted in non-proportional increases in systemic
`exposure and an ~3-fold accumulation in AUC0-24. The majority of the accumulation took
`place during the first two weeks of closing.
`0 Drug-induced histopathological changes comprised testicular Leydig cell hyperplasia and
`multiple ovarian Graafian follicles. These effects are likely a result of the antiestrogenic
`action of ICI 182,780.
`
`0 Chronic myositis was observed at injection sites.
`
`TAD/583
`Study no:
`Volume #, and page #: N_OOO\2001-O3-28\pharmtox\tox\Dose\ TAR/2972\TAD/5 83
`Conducting laboratory and location: ICI Pharmaceuticals Safety of Medicines Department
`Alderley Park Macclesfield Cheshire England
`Date of study initiation: August 22, 1989
`GLP compliance: Yes
`)
`QA report: yes (x) no (
`Drug, lot #, and % purity: ICI 182,780 analytical reference number ADM 44026/88; 99.5%
`Formulation/vehicle:
`
`."'\
`
`Ingredients
`
`lCl l82,780
`Placebo
`m %w/v m_2%w/v
`
`———
`—-a--ru
`_-m--nu
`—mm
`
`49033/89
`
`—-—reference number
`44026/88
`
`Reference Number
`
`6124/l44
`
`6124/l45
`
`Reference Number
`
`49028/89
`
`Methods:
`
`Dosing:
`Species/strain:
`#/sex/group or time point (main study):
`Satellite groups used for recovery:
`Age:
`Weight:
`Doses:
`
`Alderley Park Beagle dogs
`3/sex group
`3/sex/group for 0 and 2.5 mg/kg/d
`49—61 weeks old
`11.5-21.2 kg
`0, l, 2.5, and 4 mg/kg/d; daily x 4
`weeks
`
`Route, form, volume:
`
`1M and SC once daily
`
`56
`
`

`

`
`
`Reviewer: Lilliam A. Rosario Ph.D. NDA No.21-344
`
`
`
`o0125
`
`0. 025
`
`0.0375
`
`0.1
`2 sites
`0.15
`2 sites
`
`Total
`volume
`ml/k d
`
`0.125
`
`0.2
`
`Observations and times:
`
`Clinical signs:
`Body weights:
`Food consumption:
`Ophthalmoscopy:
`
`EKG:
`
`Hematology:
`
`Clinical chemistry:
`Urinalysis:
`Gross pathology:
`Organs weighed:
`
`Histopathology:
`Toxicokinetics:
`
`Other:
`
`Results:
`
`Mortality:
`Clinical signs:
`
`The main test animals received 28- 31 daily doses. Withdrawal
`animals received 28 doses and were then left undosed for 42 — 43
`
`days prior to necropsy.
`
`Twice daily
`Weekly
`Daily
`Pre-study period and on day 28 of dosing. Wi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket