throbber
Ranjit B. Mani, MD, HFD-120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196, Xyrem, Orphan Medical, Inc.
`
`Page 57 of 93
`5/14/01
`
`,4“
`
`. Medical conditions that the sponsor felt be relevant to the adverse event of
`“confusion” were present in 7/30 patients: these included multiple sclerosis,
`hypothyroidism, sleep apnea, and previous head injury.
`20/30 (66.7%) were over 50 years of age
`26 such adverse events occurred during the first 60 days of treatment
`All such adverse events eventually resolved
`
`.
`.
`.
`
`14.5 “Confusion” In Study 0MC—GHB-2
`
`In this randomized, double-blind, placebo—controlled trial of 4 weeks’ duration 10
`patients receiving GHB and 1 patient receiving placebo experienced confusion
`
`The distribution of this adverse event by dose group, based on the sponsor’s
`table described in Section 14.4 was as follows
`
`Dose Group
`
`Total Number Number of Patients with
`Randomized
`Confusion
`
`
`
`Percentage of Patients with
`Confusion
`
`Number (%) Permanently
`
`Discontinuing Treatment On
`Account Of Confusion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m—__ 1 3.0%
`m—_
`
`The sponsor has drawn attention to the following:
`. The highest incidence of confusion was at the 9 g/day dose
`.
`6/10 GHB-treated patients (4/6 patients treated with 9 g/day) developed confusion
`during the first week of drug exposure
`7/ 10 GHB—treated patients with confusion were > 50 years of age
`
`0
`
`The sponsor attributes the high incidence of confusion in this short trial to the
`assignment of patients to fixed doses of GHB without titration.
`
`14.6 Narratives For Patients With Confusion As A Serious Adverse Event
`
`I have read the sponsor's narratives and supplemented them with Case Report
`Forms when needed.
`~
`
`14.6.1 Patient 0207 (Initials ~_
`
`This 53 year old woman participating in OMC-GHB-Z had a past medical history of narcolepsy with
`cataplexy, and fibromyalgia. Several close family members had died shortly prior to her entering the Scharf
`trial. The patient’s father was reportedly a manic-depressive. Concomitant medications included imipramine,
`estrogen and testosterone, progestin, methylphenidate and a laxative.
`
`She received Xyrem® 6 g daily. On Day 4 of treatment she developed nausea. Beginning Day 5 she .
`became very talkative with pressured speech, and the next day was noted to be disoriented, agitated and to
`sleep poorly. She was seen at an emergency room where neurological examination was remarkable'for
`hyperreflexia. Xyrem® was discontinued, the patient was treated with haloperidol and by the next day her
`confusion had resolved. An EEG was normal and a CT scan of the head showed minor temporal lobe
`asymmetry. The study drug was permanently discontinued.
`
`14.6.2 Patient 0231 (Initials .~--
`
`This patient’s narrative is also reproduced in Section 18.2
`
`

`

`Ranjit B. Mani, MD, HFD-120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196, Xyrem, Orphan Medical, Inc.
`
`Page 58 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`This 67 year old man was enrolled in Study OMC-SXB-B. His past medical history was remarkable for a
`stomach ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and a cholecystectomy. Concomitant medications at study
`entry included clomipramine, methylphenidate, paroxetine, imipramine and modafinil.
`
`He took Xyrem® in a dose of 4.5 g/day for 12 days and 9 g/day for 106 days. After having been on a stable
`dose of 9 g/day for 106 days he awoke about 1 hour after his second nightly dose feeling dizzy and
`confused On getting out of bed he felt nauseated and vomited after reaching the bathroom. He felt a .
`sensation of "shut down" and difficulty breathing, crawled from the bathroom to lie down in the hallway until
`he felt well enough to return to bed about 1 ‘/2 hours after the episode began. Frequent cataplexy attacks
`apparently accompanied the episode. After returning to bed he slept soundly and awoke the next morning
`feeling well. The same, day he contacted the Principal investigator and withdrew from the study. He was
`never hospitalized or seen in an emergency room.
`
`At the time the episode occurred his concomitant medications included a multivitamin, DGL (a herbal
`preparation), an unspecified medication for gastroesophageal reflux and methylphenidate.
`
`The episode occurred on 7/27/99. A follow-up phone call from the study coordinator on 3/19/01 indicated
`that no further such episodes had occurred.
`
`14. 7 Narratives For Patients With Confusion As An Adverse Event
`
`Warranting Permanent Discontinuation Of GHB
`
`l have read the sponsor's narratives supplemented by Case Report Forms when
`needed
`‘
`
`14. 7.1 Patient 0207 (Initials -\_
`See Section 14.6.1
`
`14.7.2 Patient 0231 (Initials -- 1
`
`See Section 14.6.2
`
`14.7.3 Patient # 0702 (Initials . «—
`This 59 year old woman participated in Study OMC-GHB-2. She had a past history of narcolepsy with '
`cataplexy, cirrhosis and a left facial palsy. Concomitant medications included ipratropium bromide and
`albuterol.
`
`She received OMC-GHB-Z in a dose of 9 g/day. 20 days later she began experiencing confusion,
`hallucinations and forgetfulness followed in the next 2 days by nausea and paranoia. Study medication was
`discontinued when these symptoms began and her symptoms resolved 5 days later.
`
`14.8 Reviewer’s Comments
`
`‘
`0 As records for contemporaneous formal mental status examinations for‘
`patients with “confusion" are unavailable it is unclear if all patients coded as
`having this adverse event were really confused, as the term is conventionally
`understood. investigator terms suggest that at least some patients may not
`have been confused
`'
`
`o Nevertheless, the information available does suggest that GHB is capable, at
`therapeutic doses, of causing a confusional state which may be accompanied
`by psychotic symptoms. The incidence and seriousness of such adverse
`events may be slightly more pronounced at higher doses, and especially if
`higher doses are administered without titration. However a confusional state
`also appears to be capable of occurring at lower and even sub-therapeutic
`
`

`

`Ranjil B. Mani, MD, HFD-120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196, Xyrem, Orphan Medical, inc.
`
`Page 59 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`(e.g., 3 g/day) doses of GHB, and after maintenance treatment for several
`months.
`
`0 The presence of true confusion in patients taking GHB could lead to their
`taking GHB in a manner other than as prescribed.
`o The symptoms that have been subsumed under the COSTART term
`“confusion” are not surprising for a sedative drug.
`
`15. Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events In Integrated Clinical Trials
`
`15.1 Background
`
`At the Division's request neuropsychiatric adverse events in the updated
`Integrated Clinical Trials database (including the-120-Day Safety Update) were
`characterized further by the sponsor. The cut-off date for the 120-Day Safety
`Update was 9/30/00.
`
`The sponsor’s methods were as follows:
`. Adverse events coded under the following preferred terms were selected from the
`above: overdose, coma, death, depression, hallucinations, intentional overdose,
`manic depressive reaction, overdose, paranoid reaction, personality disorder,
`psychosis, stupor, suicide, and suicide attempt.
`. Source documents, Case Report Forms and data listings were reviewed for the
`above patients
`. Tabular and narrative summaries of events were then constructed. Narratives were
`
`prepared for deaths, serious adverse events and adverse event discontinuations.
`. A review of the literature relevant to the incidence of neuropsychiatric adverse events
`in narcolepsy was completed
`. The dosage at onset of each adverse event was determined and the start and stop
`dates for the adverse events recorded.
`
`15.2 Overall Summary
`
`50/402 (12.4%) GHB-treated patients had at least one adverse event coded '
`under one or more of the neuropsychiatric adverse event terms outlined in
`Section 15.1. Their distribution by dose and severity is displayed in the following
`table which i have copied from the submission.
`— lyrem Oral Solution Dosage what at Onset
`Eu':1.rc (.1 [21:33:16
`mum. Ramayana“ nu ma mm” mum-mm\ b «.
`r
`x
`Pnizexits 1mm 2 3 AF.
`Panama Hzth $35.23
`its with zelaced A53
`its $15}: seveze Mrs
`:Ls mete-nunus-d due to his
`.r. deaths due to 11::
`‘ P..- :m.: are counted cal); our: in each zeta! calm.
`= Patten-a. ver: a: placebo far a 11730:? zxnc :4. weeks! relatzv: t: the Emmy—19m expcman- cf than neatea‘ v32: szcm.
`' Sm pa:i:n:: were exposed to ante than 3 flan-g: Mung the ::;u3lx:§ . no 11:: can of ”5:27;: exposed t: spa-2:52:
`dcuggs exceed: the toza‘; number of panes“: :z: the :ncegraned dunes} (rs-1:.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As the table above indicates
`
`o
`0
`0
`
`1 death was associated with a neuropsychiatric adverse event
`7/402 (1 7%) patients had a serious neuropsychiatric adverse event
`10/402 (2.5%) patients discontinued treatment on account of a neuropsychiatric
`adverse event
`
`

`

`Ranjit e. Mani, MD, HFD-120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196, Xyrem. Orphan Medical, Inc.
`
`Page 60 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`.
`
`Such adverse events did appear to have their highest incidence at the 9 g/day
`dosage
`
`Note that 2 prominent neuropsychiatric adverse events were not included in the
`above table
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Patient # 14043, participating in Study OMC-SXB-7, who had obsessive compulsive
`disorder survived a suicide attempt. This patient was not included in the table as the
`suicide attempt was, based on an incorrectly entered date in a Case Report Form,
`mistakenly considered to have occurred about 6 weeks after treatment ended. In fact
`she was still a participant in the trial when the suicide attempt was made
`Patient # 0936, participating in Study OMC-SXB-7, who had a previous history of
`depression died from what was believed to be an overdose of multiple drugs. The
`event occurred on 2/24/01, 5 months after the cut-off date for the 120-Day Safety
`Update.
`
`15.3 Distribution Of Individual Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events
`
`The distribution of individual COSTART-coded neuropsychiatric adverse events
`is as illustrated in the following table
`'
`
`Note that patients ma have had adverse events in more than one category
`
`_
`[—
`'
`Paranoid Reaction _
`'
`
`__
`_I_
`
`
`
`
`
`15.4 Specific Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events
`
`15.4. 1 Depression
`
`'
`
`The sponsor has provided a table summarizing all patients coded to have the
`COSTART preferred term “depression."
`
`The table provides the following data: patient ID #, trial #, sex, age, dosage at
`onset of confusion, start and stop date for adverse event, investigator term,
`whether serious or not, action taken, frequency, relationship to study drug,
`severity and relevant medical history.
`
`I have not reproduced the table in this review.
`
`in regard to the table the following are noteworthy
`o Verbatim investigator terms included “depression", “depressed mood”, “situational
`depression”, “down in the dumps”, and “dysphoria”. The sponsor points out that the
`COSTART term “depression” as used in this particular context is not equivalent to a
`psychiatric diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder using DSM-lV criteria.
`27 patients experienced a total of 30 adverse events coded as depression
`26/27 patients were receiving GHB at the time of this adverse event and 1/27
`placebo
`
`0
`0
`
`,‘u
`
`

`

`Ranjit B. Mani, MD, Hszo Medical Review
`NDA 21196. Xyrem, Orphan Medical, Inc.
`
`Page 61 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`.
`3 patients had a recorded previous history of depression or bipolar disorder
`o
`in none of the instances was depression considered a serious adverse event
`. GHB was permanently discontinued in 2 patients and temporarily stopped in 2
`additional patients
`5 patients received antidepressant medication to control depressive symptoms
`0
`. No patient who attempted to or committed suicide is listed in the table
`
`15.4.2 Hallucinations
`
`The sponsor has provided a table summarizing all patients coded to have the
`COSTART preferred term “hallucinations."
`
`The table provides the following data: patient lD #, trial #, sex, age, dosage at
`onset of confusion, start and stop date for adverse event, investigator term,
`whether serious or not, action taken, frequency, relationship to study drug,
`severity and relevant medical history.
`
`l have not reproduced the table in this review.
`
`o
`o
`
`In regard to the table the following are noteworthy
`o
`9 patients had adverse events that were coded as hallucinations. In all 9 the
`investigator term also indicated that they had hallucinations.
`All 9 patients were receiving GHB at the time this adverse event appeared
`In 4/9 the hallucinations, based on the investigator term used. were hypnagogic
`hallucinations. In a further patient the hallucinations ceased with an increased dose
`of GHB and were therefore presumed to be hypnagogic hallucinations.
`. The hallucinations were characterized in 4 patients (these were not patients with
`hypnagogic hallucinations): the hallucinations were auditory in 3 and visual in 1.
`In only 1 patient were hallucinations a reason for medication discontinuation. This
`patient has already been described (see Section 14.7.3)
`
`o
`
`15.4.3 Stupor
`
`The sponsor has provided a table summarizing all patients who had an adverse
`event coded using the preferred term stupor.
`
`This table is below
`
`APPEARS THlS WAY
`0N ORlGlNAL
`
`

`

`Ranjit B. Mani, MD, HFD—120 Medical Review
`NDA 21196, Xyrem Orphan Medical, Inc.
`Donny.
`a:
`0:11.:
`(g/d)
`
`Box/Ago
`(yr)
`F4125. 4
`K135 5
`
`C12:
`
`OM:-
`as -3
`-
`
`:21.) Day‘
`Start
`Stop
`3‘
`
`era: on:- (3—1»: mecca. binary: no history I“ taxes. 1.: new taco access—3.
`
`1123'. drunk
`atcer first
`
`.
`
`.
`
`GEE-3
`
`1:75
`
`cac-
`GEE - 3
`
`ritsfli
`
`No.’
`temporarily
`:Lopped
`Bay :aL-dve t:- f. :3: .35: of xyre: it first trial 1:: the 21.31:".2: database.
`‘ "marge pas cutie: toward {run In: no»: entry,
`
`/no change
`
`intoxication
`{2:11:29
`rel:
`intoxicated
`
`'
`
`Page 62 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`Serious]
`Iroqumcy/
`{many-tor Much fur-n
`lolndmhfip/
`Ton
`V/Study Drug
`Severity
`rel: 4mm.
`rec/no—hanga 1m:mtcent/
`unknown/mild
`mccxicued —o/ Conzinuous/
`[eel mg
`temporarily
`probably
`scrapped
`related}
`IloderaLe
`con::'.n\:ous /
`probably
`related!
`moderate
`.*
`..
`
`Relevant
`lodical
`litter-y
`fiaxcclepsy.
`cataplexy ‘
`narcolepsy,
`cacaplexy ‘
`
`flax to] e.,. 5y.
`cacaplexy ‘
`
`Narcolepsy.
`cacn;lexy ‘
`Non-specific
`headaches
`flamolepsy,
`caLaplm ‘
`
`Saxrclepsy
`cataplexy‘
`
`'
`
`'
`
`Continuous/
`possibly
`relaced:'mld
`CorLLnuous/
`possibly
`related! mild
`
`Note that
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`
`“Stupor” occurred in 6 patients, all of whom had only 1 episode of this adverse event
`Investigator terms suggested that all 6 patients did not have “stupor” in the sense in
`which the term is conventionally used in the medical literature (i. e., obtunded) -
`In no patient was the adverse event serious or a reason for permanent study drug
`discontinuation
`
`0 As the sponsor has pointed out, such an adverse event is not unexpected given'the
`sedative properties of GHB
`
`15.4.4 Suicide Attempt
`
`A total of 4 GHB-treated patients attempted to commit, or successfully committed
`suicide. These patients are summarized in the following table.
`
`Patient l0 :3
`
`Study
`
`
`
`
`0531
`
`0936
`
`OMC 8X8-7
`
`F/46. 5
`
`Gglday
`
`OMC-SXB-7
`
`F/52
`
`18 months
`
`6 g/day
`
`Pre-Existing
`Investigator
`GHB Dose
`Duration Of
`
`
`
`Psychiatric
`Term And
`At Time Of
`Treatment
`
`
`
`
`History
`With GHB At Adverse
`Details Of
`
`
`Time Of
`Event
`Episode
`
`Adverse
`Event
`394 days
`
`
`
`Bipolar
`suicide
`Disorder
`3?NElicable
`Death from
`None
`Not
`multiple
`recorded at
`applicable
`
`
`
`drug
`time of study
`
`
`overdose
`entry.
`,
`'
`
`(suicide)
`Dun'ng study
`.
`was
`
`
`
`diagnosed
`‘
`
`.
`to have
`.
`‘
`bipolar
`
`
`disorder
`Depression.
`Conscious
`Study drug
`
`
`
`
`previous
`discontinued
`overdose
`
`
`
`
`(suicide
`suicide
`
`
`attem -t
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compulsive
`(suicide
`disorder
`attem-t
`
`
`Obsessive-
`
`Overdose
`
`discontinued
`
`Study dmg
`
`1131
`
`OMC-SXB~7
`
`F/46.2
`
`280 days
`
`9 g/day
`
`-4043 OMC—SXB-7
`
`
`
`Fl26
`
`11 years
`
`9 g/day
`
`
`
`
`
`The nature of the overdose in the case of the above patients was as follows
`
`

`

`Ranjit e. Mani, MD, HFD-120 Medical Review
`Page 63 of 93
`NDA 21196, Xyrem, Orphan Medical, lnc.
`6/14/01
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The sponsor points out that neither of the above fatalities was due to an
`overdose of GHB alone
`
`15.4.5 Paranoia
`
`The sponsor has provided a table summarizing all patients coded to have the
`COSTART preferred term “paranoia.”
`
`"Iqulnty/
`lolltlallbipl
`Sovcti :y
`.
`
`, I
`
`ulnar.
`Indie-1
`I: I tory
`
`These patients are summarized in the following table which I have copied from
`the submission
`
`lava-nan"
`
`s-nou-l
`“do: Ink-r.
`
`' ‘sd aiahaua .
`
`As is evident from the above table
`
`0
`
`0
`
`4/402 (1%) of patients experienced paranoia as an adverse event: in each instance
`the COSTART term matched the investigator term
`in only 1 patient was this adverse event serious and sufficient to lead to treatment
`discontinuation
`.
`
`o A previous history of depression and anxiety was present in one patient
`
`15.4.6 Coma
`
`~.
`
`The 2 patients who were coded as having this adverse event are summarized in
`the following table which i have copied from the submission
`
`.v a “W.-.” _
`
`,k.-- »--..—‘--.—..—...- A_...,._.,._. 1—._,._..‘.‘..__.__.A. -fl.‘_. .
`
`

`

`2:11) nay‘
`
`H164. 3
`
`170
`
`:70
`
`nave-agate:
`
`run
`
`non-
`responsive
`
`
`
`Inquuiqil
`lclntlonabip/
`
`6/14/01
`
`Bistcry
`Narcol epsy,
`cauplexy
`
`Page 64 of 93
`Ranjit B. Mani, MD, HFD—120 Medical Review
`
`Donny
`
`o It
`Carson-l
`On”:
`Action Taken
`I/Sru- Dr
`Savors :y
`mu: Study Drug
`
`
`
`Conunw,’
`Yes/
`
`probably
`discontinued
`
`
`related;
`
`
`
`severe
`
`
`
`
`possibly
`M "HI-- “Cindi!
`narcolepsy
`severe -
`related}
`5x2 5
`M‘ -“--i ”Ohm”
`
`
`tLl-z 1v: -o {1 rs: cost: :7.
`)y': (r. 1:;
`
`0239
`
`our
`sxs -é
`
`$15— 6
`
`NDA21196,X-yremOrphanMedical.Inc.
`
`.71“ Box/Lg.
`(9/2)
`.3an Stop
`
`
`,
`
`DepreSsi‘".
`
`in L‘n. a.:e;r.n:o.=1d.1.aux-c
`
`possibly
`related!
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`above
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:11-1 :zxa.
`
`The following additional observations can be made
`. Only one 1 patient was this adverse event seriousand sufficient to lead to GHB
`discontinuation
`Patient # 2830 is described as falling repeatedly due to cataplexy, striking her head
`against an object and losing consciousness
`
`.
`
`The sponsor points out that neither of these adverse events could be considered
`a neuropsychiatric adverse event
`
`15.4.7 Psychosis
`
`The 2 patients for whom the COSTART term “psychosis” was used are
`summarized in the following table which is copied from the submission
`'ublo 5.3.7
`lacuna I'ho zxporloncud roulblo anmnc—lurgm: acutopaychucnc zvunu of can”:
`Preferred Tar- ‘ruychOIu’ - mtogxacod Clinical “It‘d!
`
`Ne: dzsclcled a: sneezing.
`
`Sudan-l
`Action Token
`l/Btudy Drug
`
`dis:onunued
`
`Brie:
`reactive
`psychosis
`
`Stief
`reactive
`psychosis
`
`so/no change
`
`Yes/
`discontinued
`
`Iroquency/
`lolntnnahxp/
`Smrizy
`commuous/
`possbly
`:eLaLed/
`Iodezate
`
`Ruler-11:
`.061ch
`litres-y
`Ixazcalepi‘_.
`cataclexy,
`congen.‘: a1
`axouopia
`Beadlcé‘ms, .
`bizarre
`dream.
`Poor
`concentration
`and
`Intention ‘
`schixophxenta ‘
`Intcmiztent/ Narcolepsy
`definitely
`'
`xelazed,’
`moderate
`continuous] Narcolepsy
`possibly
`related]
`‘QVEYE
`
`its: on»: at Kyla: 1!: fix". :"ia.
`Dang: v-1 cutie: {maxi i... In: Ina-n entry'y.
`5702: 32-6313-3 medics: meter).- :2: :unory III “is. a: r_~::ry 3.2L: mC-GEE—s.
`
`i.a: the unegraufl database.
`
`As the table indicates
`
`o The COSTART term matched the investigator term in each instance
`. Both patients discontinued GHB on account of this adverse event; in one patient the
`adverse event was considered serious
`
`. One patient had a pre-existing history of schizophrenia
`
`15.4.8 Manic Depressive Reaction
`
`The single patient who had this adverse is summarized in the next table
`
`

`

`Ranjit B. Mani, MD. HFD-120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196 Xyrem Orphan Medical, Inc.
`Dosage
`a:
`nu: Dny’
`enact
`(g/d) Stu:
`
`nvuugnzor
`tn:-
`
`nipo-ar
`affective
`disorder
`
`5inu t: 2..
`
`11:
`
`the. imam-anti {azalasn
`
`Page 65 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`Serious]
`bctton Token
`v/s tudy Drug
`Yes/
`diumiinud
`
`Iroquucy/
`nlotxonlhtp/
`Severity
`
`lolovmt
`undies]
`In tax-y
`
`Continuous/
`no: related/
`severe
`
`Karcolepsy
`nig:;ing ‘
`Depresszc-f‘;
`
`*‘
`
`Note that this patient had a prior history of depression
`
`15.4. 9 Personality Disorder
`
`The patient outlined in the next table experienced a prolonged grief reaction
`(coded using the COSTART term of “personality disorder") following the death of
`a relative. The event appears to have resolved without cessation of study
`medication.
`
`Faun:
`so.
`
`trial
`
`Do::ge
`lax/Ago Once: Rh; Day‘
`(old)
`tyx)
`sun.
`Stop
`
`Investigator
`tex-
`
`serious]
`Action Taken
`v/S tudy Drug
`
`IthmL'y/
`notation-hip]
`severity
`
`iciovnnc
`medical
`notary
`
`.1323: a: xyxen := “in: :r'.a: in the Late-gist“:argue-t.
`
`Grief reaction
`
`Saint") chart-3?:
`
`7.22m. :Lenli Karen}”repay,
`
`patches: ” re, re:.3:ave to r;n:
`
`’ Thu E Ha: also recezoed tn me: pretense tar: depression} a: Ina: entry to: m-m~7,
`
`15.5 Narratives For Deaths Associated With Neuropsychiatric Adverse
`Events, Serious Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events, and Discontinuations
`Due To Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events
`-
`These narratives are below
`
`15.5.1 Patient # 0932 (Initials ‘—
`
`This 24 year old woman who participated in OMC-SXB-6 had a history of depression dating back to 1994.
`Her dose of Xyrem® was increased from 4.5 g daily to 6 g daily. On Day 84 she experienced auditory
`hallucinations for which she was hospitalized and treated with olanzapine. Her dose of Xyrem® was then
`reduced to 4.5 g daily. Her hallucinations resolved and she was discharged after 14 days continuing with
`GHB for the remainder of the trial. Hospital discharge records indicated to her investigator that for the
`previous 5 years she had experienced repeated auditory hallucinations and had 2 psychiatric
`-
`hospitalizations
`
`'
`
`15 5 2 Patient # 0531 (Initials ——
`
`Patient # 0531 was a 47 year old woman who had earlier participatedin the OMC- SXB6 trial and had been
`taking Xyrem® 6 g/day since 6/3/99 Her past medical history that the investigator was aware of at
`‘
`screening was remarkable for a bipolar disorder, a previous head injury with coma and a morphine allergy.
`‘ Concomitant medications included thyroxine, zolpidem, an albuterol inhaler, loratadine, risperidone and '
`temazepam. Subsequently the investigator realized that she had previously made a suicide attempt
`
`in May 2000 she began experiencing worsening insomnia On 6/12/00 she underwent an elective surgical
`procedure for metrorrhagia
`.,-
`
`On 7/4/00 she asked friends to leave a gathering at her home as she felt unwell. After a friend was unable to
`contact her, emergency personnel entered her home and found her dead the following day. A postmortem
`toxicology screen was positive for opiates, acetaminophen and benzodiazepines. Quantitative testing
`showed toxic levels of multiple drugs including hydrocodone, oxycodone, morphine, hydromorphone.
`
`

`

`Ranjit e. Mani, MD.’HFD-120 Medical Review
`NDA 21196, Xyrem, Orphan Medical. Inc.
`
`Page 66 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`nordiazepam and zolpidem. it was presumed that she had committed suicide by taking an overdose of
`multiple drugs. The death certificate listed multiple‘drug toxicity as the cause of her death with
`atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease also being listed as a significant factor.
`
`Post-modem toxicology screening for GHB was not done, but the sponsor believes that this patient did not
`take an overdose of that drug for the following reasons
`0
`At her last trial visit on 5/23/00 the patient received 6 bottles of Xyrem®, each containing 200 mL of the
`drug (each bottle contained 500 mg/mL)
`On 7/11/00 the patient's family returned to the investigator 5 bottles (4 full and 1 empty)
`The f3m bottle containing some drug was retained by the medical examiner but the quantity of drug in
`that bottle is not known
`
`o
`.
`
`0
`
`The sponsor states that the although the patient‘s compliance with the drug could not be precisely
`estimated it was calculated as being between 39 and 78%
`
`15.5.3 Patient#0936 (Initials -—
`
`"
`
`This 52 year old woman participated first in Study OMC-SXB-B, and then in OMC-SXB-T. She has a past
`medical history of narcolepsy with cataplexy, surgery for obesity and depression.
`
`She received Xyrem® for a total of about 18 months. About 3 days before her death she saw a psychiatrist
`who diagnosed a possible bipolar disorder and prescribed lithium and paroxetine.
`
`She was found dead in her home. Based on what remained of her supply of GHB she was believed to have
`consumed about 600 mL over 3 days. Prescription bottles for lithium (which should have contained about 60
`tablets of uncertain strength), paroxetine (which should have contained about 45 tablets of uncertain
`strength) and oxycodone-acetaminophen were found to be empty. A full medical examiners report is
`pending but she was felt by the investigator to have died of an overdose of multiple drugs.
`
`Earlier during the study she had been hospitalized twice on account of kidney stones. Other medications
`prescribed during the study were cephalexin and iron supplements
`‘
`,
`
`15.5.4 Patient # 1 131 (Initials
`
`--‘-‘
`
`This 46 year old man was begun on Xyrem® on 4/30/99. At study entry he did not disclose that he had a
`past history of depression and a previous suicide attempt. Concomitant medications at study entry included
`modafinii 400 mg/day, ibuprofen. an aspirin-acetaminophen-caffeine combination pill, dextroamphetamine
`and bupropion (for smoking cessation).
`-
`
`His regular dose of Xyrem® at the time of the serious adverse event described below was 9 g/day.
`
`'
`He took an overdose of Xyrem® (subsequently estimated at 150 g) on 2/2/00. His wife found him
`unresponsive and incontinent of urine and feces that day. He was initially unresponsive with apneic spells,
`but with normal arterial blood gases He later became combative and finally awoke, at which time he was
`observed to be depressed. He reported multiple major sources of stress He required psychiatric
`hospitalization and did not resume Xyrem®.
`
`15 5. 5 Patient # 14043 (India/s"
`This 26 year old woman had previously participatedin the Scharf trial and had received GHB since 7/5/89.
`She entered the OMC—SXB—7 trial on 8/30/99. Her past medical history was remarkable for obsessive
`compulsive disorder. Concomitant medications during the OMC-SXB-7 trial include fluvoxamine, buspirone
`and methylphenidate.
`
`On 4/2/00 she took her usual dose of Xyrem® (7.5 g/day) and then attempted suicide by taking 56 tablets of
`buspirone 5 mg. She immediately told her father what had happened, was taken to an emergency room
`
`. ‘-.-_-.._.....T.._._.—__.~_._‘__.- “— ‘ .7
`. A.<,,7-.._,..-
`..
`-
`.,
`
`r..-
`
`

`

`Ranjit r3. Mani. MD, HFD—120 Medical Review
`NBA 21196. Xyrem. Orphan Medical. Inc.
`
`Page 67 ~of 93
`6/14/01
`
`where she was treated and released. She reported being increasingly self-critical from January 2000
`onward after beginning methylphenidate. After discontinuing Xyrem® (last dose on 4/4/00) she became
`more negative in outlook and noted an increase in cataplexy and in sleepiness.
`
`15.5.6 Patient # 0232 (Initials ‘—
`This 44 year old woman with no previous history of psychiatric illness began taking Xyrem® on 4/1/99; from
`January 2000 onwards she took a stable dose of 9 g/day.
`
`She entered OMC-SXB-21 from OMC-SXB-Y. Concomitant medications at that time included modafinil,
`verapamil, ranitidine, aspirin and ibuprofen. She completed OMC-SXB-21 on 7/28/00 and re-entered OMC—
`SXB»7 taking 9 g/day again. After the blind for OMC-SXB-21 was broken it was confirmed that she had
`taken Xyrem® 9 g/day throughout that study as well.
`
`On 8/1/00 she was hospitalized in an acutely paranoid state. She discharged herself from the hospital but
`was readmitted on 8/3/00. During her hospitalization she was treated with haloperidol, temazepam and
`clomipramine (clomipramine had been discontinued on 5/9/00). No GHB was administered after 7/30/00 and
`on 8/14/00 she told the investigator that she well. Clomipramine was apparently stopped and then resumed
`on 9/28/00 with a return of paranoia for a limited duration; this drug was however continued as apparently
`was modafinil. By 10/12/00 she had apparently returned to normal.
`
`15.5. 7 Patient # 0238 (Initials t,
`This 65 year old man, participating in OMC—SXB-B, had been taking Xyrem® 4.5 g daily for 5 months. He
`had a background history of hypertension.
`
`Immediately after his wife heard a loud noise around midnight, he was found comatose, flaccid, incontinent,
`bradycardic and hypoventilating. No convulsive movements had been witnessed. He required intubation and
`artificial ventilation. However the same day he awoke, was extubated and returned home. An EEG was
`normal; an echocardiogram showed ventricular hypertrophy with posterolateral wall hypokinesia, but with a
`satisfactory ejection fraction. A 'cardiac event" was proposed as a cause for his symptoms by the hospital
`staff caring for him. However the Principal Investigator, after reviewing his hospital records considered the
`possibility that an inadvertent overdose with GHB was responsible for the episode was responsible for the
`episode. Study medication was permanently discontinued. Further information is not available.
`
`15.5.8 Patient # 2030 (Initials --')
`
`This 18 year old man began taking Xyrem® on 5/28/99 and was maintained on a stable dose of 9 g/day
`thereafter. Concomitant medications included zolpidem, protriptyline, modafinil (200 mglday), fluoxetine 20
`mg/day. methylphenidate 4045 mg/day. He reported no previous psychiatric history.
`
`On 12/15/99 he began experiencing paranoia, confusion and hallucinations. He reported increasing his dose
`of methylphenidate earlier while preparing for examinations. He was hospitalized and treated with multiple
`medications. Xyrem® was stopped on 12/22/99. He improved and his psychosis was attributed to
`‘
`‘
`methylphenidate overuse and to sleep deprivation.
`
`15.5.9 Patient # 0931 (Initials—’7
`
`This 29 year old woman had taken Xyrem® from 7/5/99 until she developed the serious adverse event listed
`in the table above in April 2000. At screening, she did not disclose that she had a past history of depression.
`
`Her dose of Xyrem® at the time of the adverse event was 4.5 g/day. She was also receiving modafinil 600
`mg/day.
`"
`
`On 4/27/00 the study coordinator was informed that the patient had been hallucinating and had lost herjob
`owing to a diminished ability to function at work. On 4/29/00 the patient was found to be unarousable m her
`car by emergency personnel: on being awakened she became violently agitated, but was also slow in'
`
`__. ~ 2.. v—-~‘-— w‘fi_.~v.—., fivvwawwvw. .
`
`-
`
`V
`
`_
`
`~ ,
`
`

`

`Ranjit e. Mani. MD. HFD—120 Medical Review
`NDA 21196, Xyrem. Orphan Medical, inc.
`
`Page 68 of 93
`6/14/01
`
`responding to questions. She was hospitalizedand treated with multiple medications for agitation. Her urine
`drug screen was positive for benzodiazepines. The patient later reported that on 4/29/00 she pulled off the
`road to sleep at which time she took both nightly doses of Xyrem® together without dilution. She was
`diagnosed to have a bipolar disorder.
`
`She did not take any Xyrem® after 4/29/00 and at a follow-up visit on 6/14/00 appeared mentally well.
`
`15. 5 10 Patient # 0204 (Initials‘—-
`
`This 60 year old woman received GHBin OMC-GHB—3 At the time of her entry into the study, and prior to
`receiving GHB she was irritable, depressed and had difficulty awaking Her only concomitant medication
`included acetaminophen.
`
`During her participation in the trial she reported continued depression and insomnia.'She received GHB
`initially in a dose of 6.0 g/day and later in a dose of 9 g/day. 19 days after first entering the study she
`discontinued participation on account of a lack of efficacy
`
`155.11 Patient # 0213 (Initials W
`This 60 year old man participatedin OMC-GHB-3 prior to which he had received GHB for about 4 months.
`He did not have a past medical history of depression
`
`He entered the OMC-GHB’3 study on a dose of 6 g/day. While in this study his dose was increased to 9
`g/day; it was later reduced to 3 g/day on account of a depressed mood and excessive tiredness. After
`temporary interruptions of treatment to see if he improved . he eventually discontinued taking the drug
`permanently following which these adverse events resolved
`'
`
`15.5.12 Patient # 0702 (Initials -
`
`This 59 year old woman participated in Study OMC-GHB-Z. She had a past history of narcolepsy witli
`cataplexy, cirrhosis and a left facial palsy. Concomitant medications included ipratropium bromide and
`albuterol.
`
`She received OMC-GHB-2m a dose of 9 g/day. 20 dayslater she began experiencing contusion,
`hallucinations and torgetfulness followedin the next 2 days by nausea and paranoia Study medication was
`discontinued when these symptoms began and her symptoms resolved 5 days later.
`
`15.5.13 Patient # 1101 (Initials ~—
`This 39 year old man participatedin Study OMC~GHB~3 At the time of entry into the study he was receiving
`dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate both of which had been taken for about a year.
`
`He received GHB for about 6 months, last in a dose of 4.5 g/day. After 6 months of treatment he developed
`an “acute psychosis" leading to discontinuation of all stimulant drugs. About 2 months prior to that,
`methylphenidate had been discontinued and amph

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket