throbber

`
`

`

`
`
`)n#21-038
`
`-HFD-17O
`
`- ”210;?”
`
`m
`“21033
`”ll”l'llllllll
`Iliummmmummlmumum
`DRUG NAME: Precedex (dexmedetomidine hc1 I'njcuuuu,
`'
`be?“ ,
`Mas/9
`
`APPLICANT: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
`
`CHEMICAL & THERAPEUTIC CLASSJS
`
`Review Cycle: 1
`Submission Date:12-18-98
`Receipt Date:lZ-18-98
`Goal Date:12-18-99
`ActionzAP
`
`Review Cycle: 3
`Submission Date:
`Receipt Date:
`Goal Date:
`Action:
`
`Action:
`
`Review Cycle: 2
`Submission Date:
`Receipt Date:
`Goal Date:
`Action:
`
`Review Cycle: 4'
`Submission Date:
`Receipt Date:
`Goal Date:
`
`Phone # & Office Room #:301-827-7410, 93-45
`
`I
`
`MEDICALzPatricia Hartwell, M.D., M.B.A.
`
`CH EMISTRY:Michael Theodorakis, Ph.D.
`
`PHARMfl‘OX:Harry Geyer, Ph.D.
`
`BlOMETRlCS: Z.Jonathan Ma, Ph.D.
`
` PROJECT MANAGER/ CSO :Susmita Samanta
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BlOPHARMACEUTlCS:Suresh Doddapaneni, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`
`ABUSE LIABILITY: BeLinda A. Hayes, Ph.D.
`
` MICROBIOLOGIST: Patricia Hughes, Ph.D.
`
`Volume 3 Of 4
`
`Administrative volume #(s): 1
`Clinical volume #(s): 2
`CMC volume #(s): 3
`
`5-
`
`Phannacology/Toxicology volume #(s): 4
`
`

`

`ODE II ACTION PACKAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Application #2’1-038'
`
`Drug Name: Precedex (dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride injection), 2 mL ampule/2 mL vial, 100
`
`mcg/mL
`
`Applicant: Abbott Laboratories
`
`Chem/Ther. Type: 1 S
`
`CSO/PM: Susmita Samanta
`
`Phone? 301-827-7410
`
`*HFD-17O
`
`Original Application Date: December 18, 1998 Original Receipt Date: December 18, 1998
`
`
`i
`
`‘
`
`CURRENT USER FEE GOAL DATE: December 18, l999DateTableofContentsCompleted2-9/13/99
`.
`-
`,,
`_
`.
`X(complered),
`Section A:
`i a' e"
`N/A (not applicable),
`or Comment
`
`
`Tab A-l
`
`Action.Letter(s)
`
`Current ActionzAP
`
`' Tab A-2
`
`Phase 4 Commitments:
`
`a. Copy of applicants communication committing to Phase 4
`
`b. Agency Correspondence requesting Phase 4 Commitments
`
`Tab A-3
`
`FDA revised Labels & Labeling and Reviews:
`(Separate each version/cycle with a colored sheet)
`
`a. Package Insert
`
`Tab A-4
`
`Original Proposed Labeling
`
`Tab A-S
`
`Foreign Labeling:
`
`...............................................................
`
`a. Foreign Marketing History
`
`Tab A-6
`Tab A-7
`Tab A-8
`
`b. Foreign Labeling and Review(s)
`"
`Labeling and Nomenclature Committee’s Tradename Review
`Summary Memoranda (e.g., Division Director, Group Leader, Office)
`Copy of Patent Statement
`
`‘
`
`Exclusivity Checklist (and any requests for exclusivity)
`
`Debannent Statements ......................................................................
`
`Tab A-9
`
`Correspondences, Faxes, & Telecons
`
`Tab A-lO Minutes of Meetings:
`
`3. ,End-of-Phase 11 meeting
`
`b. Pre-NDA meeting(s)
`
`c. Filing meeting
`
`d. Other meetings
`
`Tab A-l ]
`
`Advisory Committee Meeting:
`
`a. Questions Considered by the committee
`b. List of Attendees
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`ODE II ACTION PACKAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
`
`_App1ication’#21-038 Drug Name: Dexmedetomidine HCL
`
`gamma;
`
`'
`
`Climallnhunafism
`
`"
`
`,_.
`
`X (completed),
`N/A (not applicab|e),
`or Comment
`
`Tab B-l
`
`Tab B-2
`
`Tab B-3
`Tab B-4
`
`Tab-B-S
`Tab B-6
`Tab B-7
`
`Tab 8-8
`' Tab B-9
`
`Clinical Reviews and Memoranda .......................................................
`
`Safety Update Reviews .....................................................................
`
`'......................
`Pediatric Page
`Statistical (Clinical) Review and Memoranda ..........................................
`
`summary of Safety (from the summary volume of the application) .....................
`
`- Biopharmaceutics Review and Memoranda ............................................
`Abuse Liability Review......................................
`DSI Audits ....................................................................................
`
`Summary of Efficacy (fiom the summary volume of the application) ..................
`
`Section E;
`
`-
`
`1
`
`a
`
`.
`
`a
`
`‘
`g'
`W
`
`'
`
`[is “M 1
`
`X(completed),
`N/A (not applicable),
`or Comment
`
`Tab C-l .
`
`CMC Reviews and Memoranda ..........................‘. ..............................
`
`Tab 02
`
`DMF Reviews ..............................................................................
`
`Tab 03
`
`EA Reviews/FONSI .......................................................................
`
`Tab C-4
`
`Micro Review (validation of sterilization) .............................................
`
`Tab C-5
`
`Statistical Review of drug stability
`
`N..................................
`
`‘
`
`Tab C-6
`
`Inspection of facilities => Decision:
`
`-
`
`Date:
`
`Tab 07
`
`Methods Validation Information ........................................................
`
`
`
`
`
`Section D;
`
`
`
`X (completed),
`N/A (not applicable),
`or Comment ..
`
`Tab D-l
`
`Pharmacologyfl'oxicology Reviews and Memoranda ...............................
`
`Tab 112
`
`Carcinogenicity Review (statistical)
`
`......................
`
`_
`
`CAC/Executive Committee Report .....................................................
`Tab D-3
`
`ADDITIONAL NOTES:
`
`—-—-——————————————__.___________—__
`
`

`

`‘ aABBDTT -
`
`-
`
`Hoseital Products Division
`Abbott Laboratories
`oaas. Bldg. A930
`200 Abbott Park Road
`Abbott Park. Illinois 60064-6157
`
`'
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR A CATEGOEICAL EXCLUSlON
`
`
`
`
`Abbott Laboratories hereby requests
`a CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
`requirements of an Environmental Impact Report under the provisions of 21 CFR
`
`
`
`
`ABBOTT LABORATORIES
`
`
`
`
`
`2%,Wm 32/
`
`e
`
`Thomas F. Willer, PhD.
`Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs
`Hospital Products Division
`Phone: (847) 937-6845
`Fax:
`(847) 938—7867
`lnternet: WILLETF@hpd.abbott.com
`
`-
`
`-
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATIoN-QOF COMPLIANCE
`Rocky Mount, North Carolina Facility
`
`Abbott Laboratoriee certiflee that it in in complionce with. or on an enforceable schedule to be in
`compliance with.oll emittsion requirements .set forth in permits. consent decrees; and
`administrative orders applicable to solution preparation and filling of Dexmedetomidine
`E
`Hydrochloride inlectlon at its facility in Rocky Mount. North Carolina as well aoemlesion
`requirements set forth in applicable federal. state, and local environmental and occupational
`exposure statutes and regulations applicable to solution preparation and filling of
`Dexmedetomidlno Hydrochloride Injection at its facility in Rocky Mount. North Carolina.
`
`-
`
`
`Signature: gag. .
`
`John Robbins
`Principal Environmental Specialist
`Abbott Labomtol'leS.
`Hospital Products Division‘ '
`
`Date: W7
`
`‘ APPEARS THlS WAY
`on ORlGlNAl.
`
`mytpuvx
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`as, an inn
`ASBA-BQEMVB) SHIUJJU 533 6880 wavzet
`sr/S'd
`W
`
`

`

`
`
`gnu.
`
`,‘f/ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`i. C
`Memorandum
`
`Public Health Service
`
`FoodandDrugAdniristratim
`
`DATE:
`
`November 29, 1999
`
`FROM: Albinus M. I_)'Sa, Ph.D.
`
`.TO:
`
`Cynthia McCormick, M.D.
`
`\C3\
`
`-
`
`1'1
`
`SUBJECT: .
`
`NDA 21-038, CMC review status
`
`‘
`
`I am writing this memo to inform you that currently all CMC issues are resolved and ”that the NDA
`from the CMC stand point is recommended for approval.
`
`~
`
`.
`
`‘ Previously, our recommendation in the CMC review #1, dated milk; 30, 1999, was agprovable. This
`was because the Office of Compliance recommendation was pending and the BE indicated that
`,. M"
`Upon talking with the compliance officer, Mr. Richard Friedman and the inspector Mr. Thomas
`Arista, I was informed thatW "X _
`.The
`applicantwas working on the deficiencies listed in the form—483, as listed by the inspector. All of
`these issues pertained to Current Good Manufacturing Practice. However, the inspection deficiencies
`only applied to drug substances that were to be used in manufacturing a drug product via an
`aseptically filled sterile process. Dexmetatomidine HCl, is a terminally sterilized product and
`therefore the issues in the form-483, did not apply to this particular NDA. The drug product
`manufacturing facility was found to be acceptable from the CGMP perspective. The office of
`compliance could not however provide an acceptable recommendation to the £138 request because
`of the pending CGMP issues at the firm.
`
`A consult was initiated (based on an E-mail from Dr. Rappaport) to Microbiology to seek advice on . {/9
`the micro issues that compliance had raised in the form—483; the response is pending. However, in J 7,:
`the interim, the firm has complied with all of the CGMP observations, and the Office of Compliance ‘..J 15"
`on November 19, 1999, reported an acceptable. status for all the facilities in the‘EES request.
`'-
`Therefore from the CMC standpoint, this application is recommended for approval.
`’7 ~.1
`,
`.
`\
`J) /
`J‘-
`The other issues that needed clarification were as follows, however none ofthese are approvability
`3/
`issues:
`3,
`
`r
`'
`
`ExCept for one, all issues raised in the NDA review pertain to labeling. On the one issue, the
`applicant has tightened the specs for endotoxin. The reviewer was asking for data to support the new
`specs. At this point this data may not be important because the marketed product will have to meet
`these new tighter specs.
`The applicant has satisfactorily addressed the issues raised in DMF. The stability protocol for the
`drug substance is modified as requested, and a plicant has agreed to perform acceptance testing of
`every lot of drug substance based on the speci ications of the drug substance. The DMF holder will
`have an expiration date for the drug substance of 3 years, based on the stability data for the drug .
`substance.
`
`And finally, a standard statement should on methods validation should be included in the approval
`letter, because the FDA labs have not yet completed the validation.
`-
`
`

`

`
`
`FOOD and DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER of DRUG EVALUATION and RESEARCH
`
`DIVISION OF ANESTHETICS, CRITICAL CARE and ADDICTION DRUG
`PRODUCTS ( DACCADP)
`HFD- 17 o
`
`NDA:21-038
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW #:1
`
`- = REVIEW DATE: 30-JUN-99
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`SUBMISSION TYPE
`ORIGINAL
`—
`AMENDMENTIAC]
`AMENDMENT[BC]
`
`DOCUMENT DATE
`l8-DEC-98
`- 09aFEB-99
`30-APR-99
`
`CDER DATE ASSIGNED DATE
`Is-DEc-98
`23-DEC-98
`
`O3-MAY-99
`
`__
`
`NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:
`Abbott Laboratories‘
`Hospital Products Division
`D-389, Bldg. AP30200
`Abbott Park Road
`
`Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-3537
`
`_Attn: Thomas F. WillerjPhD.
`Assistant Director. Regulatory Affairs
`tel.: 874-937-6845
`
`DRUG PRODUCT NAME
`
`Progrietarv:
`Nongrogrietarv/USAN:
`Code Name/#:
`
`~\——
`dexmedetornidine HCl
`
`Chem.Tvge/Ther.Class:
`
`1 S
`
`PHARMACOL.CATEGORY/INDICATION:
`
`Injection
`DOSAGE FORM:
`IOO pg/mL, 2 mL, in a 2 mL amfioule or vial
`STRENGTHS:
`ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION:
`DISPENSED:
`
`X Rx
`
`OTC
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`CHEMICAL NAME, STRUCTURAL FORMULA, MOLECULAR
`FORMULA, MOL.WT:
`
`
`
`’
`
`(S)-4.[1-(2.3~dimethylphenyl)ethyl]-
`1H-imidazole hydrochloride
`DEXMEDETOMIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21—038
`
`.
`
`Chemistry Review # l
`
`Page 2 of 33
`
`CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS:
`
`a. No DMF reviews are pending.
`
`b. The validation of the analytical methods is in progress.
`
`@lnspection of the facilities has been completed.
`'W .
`
`'M. ‘
`7 a W
`
`‘
`
`g1,
`
`. d All chemistry related consult reviews, namely themicrobiology and tradename reviews, have
`been completed.
`
`(‘fiul ‘
`
`{'9 The comments and deficiencies listed in the Draft Letter must be conveyed to the Applicantk: ,i
`
`_ D This application is approvablgl'from the chemistry standpoint pending satisfactory resolution
`of the issues relatedW ‘V
`
`.
`
`\3‘
`
`
`
`Michael C. Theodorakis, Ph.D.
`Senior Review Chemist
`
`Albinus M. D'Sa, Ph.D.
`
`Chemistry Team Leader
`
`——l
`
`

`

`REVIEW FOR HFD-17O
`
`OFFICE OF NEW DRUG CHEMISTRY
`
`MICROBIOLOGY STAFF
`
`ADDENDUM TO MICROBIOLOGIST'S REVIEW #1 OF NDA
`November 23,1999
`
`.A.
`
`'
`
`1.
`
`NDA ’-
`
`_
`
`21-038
`
`SEQNSQR
`
`Abbott Laboratories
`
`
`
`demedetomidine HCl) for Infusion
`
`: Sten'le 2 mL vials
`and 2 rnL ampules for nfusion
`
`4. W: Terminal moxst heat by autoclave. The
`ampule presentation is aseptically processed before the autoclave cycle.
`
`' 5.
`
`' W: Sedative
`
`6. W: IS
`
`-
`
`B.
`
`l. W: Deceinber 18, 1998
`
`2. W: N/A
`
`3. W: Microbiologist’s Review #1 dated April 27, 1999,
`Inspection Report (FDA 483) dated March 6, 1999, and letter from Compliance to
`
`4. AW 11/12/99
`
`C. W: The consult request asks for an evaluation of the inspection report of the
`
`m .The inspection evaluated e—x—
`aseptic processing of finished small volume stenle solution products, and resulted1n
`findings of cGMP deviations Consequently, a letter was sent (November 1, 1999) from
`the FDA’s Office ofCompliance to notify the firm that it was not in a state of
`compliance. Microbiologist’s Review #1 ofthe NDA was done by Dr. Patricia Hughes.
`and recommended approval ofthe finished product, which is manufactured at Abbott‘s
`facility in Rocky Mount. NC. Notes concerning the lnvestigator’s findings, Compliance‘s
`
`WT",
`
`.-~
`
`Page I
`
`

`

`
`
`Addendum to Microbiologist's Review #1
`.
`'
`NDA 21-038
`
`
`recommendation, and the Microbiologist‘s review are provided in the “Review Notes"
`that follow.
`
`D. W: The application is recommended for APPROVAL. Additional
`considerations are discussed in section “B. Review Notes”.
`
`./
`
`\ \
`fa
`Davidi—Iussong,Ph.
`.
`‘ 7.7+:
`
`u-‘st‘is
`
`1! /23/Qf
`
`APPEARS nus
`0N omcmuw"
`
`

`

`
`
` DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`
`
`
` FROM: HFD- I 70 (Division of AnestheticLCriticol Core, and Addiction
`
`REQUEST FOR CONSULTATI
`
`Drug Products),-Dr. Cynthia McCormick
`
`
`. TOIDivision/Ollice): HFD-l60 (Division of Microbiology). Dr. Peter
`’
`‘ey, Porklown Rm IBB-OB
`
`
`TYPE OF DOCUMENT
`DATE OF DOCUMENT
`
`
`
`November 10. 1999
`
`November I, I999
`Conclusion of COMP inspection
`
`
`
`of Dexmedetomidlne locility in
`F—————‘\_—_—
`
`
`
`
` NAME OF DRUG
`PRIORITY CONSIDERATION
`cwsmcmow or DRUG
`
`
`DESIRED COMPLETION DATE
`
`
`Dexmedetomidine
`I-S
`~
`ASAP
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`REASION FOR REQUEST
`
`High
`
`
`
`-
`
`-.
`
`.-
`
` I I i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D PRE-NDA MEETING
`D NEW PROTOCOL
`D END OF PHASE II MEETING
`. D PROGRESS REPORT
`
`D RESUBMISSION
`E D‘NEW CORRESPONDENCE
`D SAFETY/EFFICACY
`, D DRUG ADVERTISING ~
`
`
`
`D PAPER NDA
`—D ADVERSE REACTION REPORT
`
`
`D CONTROL SUPPLEMENT
`I MANUFACTURING CHANGE/ADDITION
`D MEETING PLANNED BY
`
`
`
` II. BIOMETRICS
`
`I. GENERAL
`
`- -‘
`
`’4... D RESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY LETTER
`.j , D FINAL PRINTED LABELING
`D LABELING REVISION
`D ORIGINAL NEW CORRESPONDENCE
`D FORMULATIVE REVIEW
`D OTHER (SPECIFY BELOW):
`..
`
`
`D TYPE A OR B NDA REVIEW
`
`
`D CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`r-~-oor PHASE ”MEETING
`/\0. C) J
`D PHARMACOLOGY
`
`
`
`o BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`c C\
`lTROLLED STUDIES
`‘1/
`
`
`:1 OTHER (SPECIFY BELOW):
`1,\\
`.-roc0L .REVle
`\
`
`
`
`0 OTHER (SPECIFY BELOW):
`\\\\
`
` III. BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`
`
`
`
`D DEFICIENCY LETTER RESPONSE
`D PROTOCOL-BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`D IN-VIVO WAIVER REQUEST
`
`D DISSOLUTION
`D BIOAVAILABILTY STUDIES
`D PHASE IV STUDIES
`
`D PHASE IV SURVEILLANCE/EPIDEMIOLOGY PROTOCOL
`D DRUG USE e.g. POPULATION EXPOSURE. ASSOCIATED, DIAGNOSES
`D CASE REPORTS OF SPECIFIC REACTIONS (List below)
`D COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT ON GENERIC DRUG GROUP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D REVIEW OF MARKETING EXPERIENCE. DRUG USE AND SAFETY
`D SUMMARY OF ADVERSE EXPERIENCE
`D POISION RICK ANALYSIS
`
`
`
`
`
`IV. DRUG EXPERIENCE
`
`COMMENTS/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
`
`
`
`Please review the microbiology~related conclusions of the cGMP inspection of the facility for manufacturing the bulk dmg substance, dexmedetomidine HCI.
`located in Espoo Finland.
`It should be noted that the bulk substance is shipped to US and the drug product, dexmedetomidine HCI injection. is manufactured
`by Abbott Labs and is terminally sterilized. The Abbott Labs facility was tound to be acceptable by Compliance. Please indicate whether or not the approvable
`recommendation of your staff regarding this appliation is still valid. Please note that the SVT product (NDA 20-038) was not evaluated in this establishment
`inspection.
`
`
`
`
`
`é“ n‘tqu”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[-IIYOU have any written comments, please provide a copy tor Laura Governale. Regulatory Project Manager. HDF-170 and Joan Fuschet"
`
`'
`
`tURE or REQUESTER
`
`(
`
`;_
`
`' SIGNATURE OF RECEIVER
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`gf
`3
`‘
`
`aw...‘
`
`..
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`(.
`__
`_
`.
`puauc HEALTH SERVICE
`_.
`h _
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`‘ In
`
`Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality, HFDo320
`_
`‘
`.
`7520 Standish Place
`Rockwlle; Maryland 20855-2737
`
`TELEPHONE:
`FAX:
`
`(301) 594-0093
`(301) 594-2202
`
`-
`
`'
`
`NOV
`
`I
`
`'999
`
`_
`
`Dr. Jyrki Mattila
`President
`
`'
`
`Orion Corporation,
`Orion Pharma
`‘Orionintie 2
`
`02101 Espoo, Finland
`
`—
`
`_
`Dear Mr. Mattila:
`The Food 8t Drug Administration has completed its review of the March 1-6,
`1999 inspection of your sterile pharmaceutical manufacturing facility in Espoo,
`Finland. The inspection revealed significant deviations from current good
`manufacturing practices (CGMP) in the manufacture of sterile
`pharmaceuticals. The deviations were presented to your attention on an FDA-
`483 List of Observations at the close of the inspection. The CGMP deviations
`cause these drug products to be adulterated within the meaning of section
`501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
`
`Some notable deficiencies include:
`
`1. No records that equipment was sterilized or disinfected. No record existed
`for materials/equipment including but not limited to: stopper bowl, stopper
`bowl plastic cover, RCS microbial sampler, and scissors.
`
`It should be noted that sterilization and sanitization records are fundamental
`
`to a sterile drug product manufacturing operation. As part of your response to
`this issue, please specifically state whether stopper bowls (and associated
`covers) are sterilized or only disinfected.
`
`2. Lack of reconcilability of vials discarded during the media fill opefation.
`
`Inadequate Studies performed to evaluate laminarity of air in class 100
`3.
`processing zone.
`
`4. Failure to adequately control computer software used to record and process
`data for annualjgeports, complaint handling, raw material weighing, creating
`
`

`

`
`
`Page 2- Orion Pharma, Fl (96l0102)
`
`batch record instructions (in some instances), and control/release of goods
`from raw material through finished stages.
`
`5. A number of instances of failure to maintain either adequate or sufficient
`records, including validation documentation.
`
`For example, autoclave load configurations and placement of thermocouples in
`autoclave chamber were not adequately described in SOPs. As another
`example, your firm did not document which aerosol compound was used for
`performing integrity tests of HEPA filters in the aseptic processing area.
`
`With regard to computers, we note that there was no record of original system
`requirements or design.
`In addition, the previous software version/s/ for
`significant- programs were not retained. Version control should be practiced
`for software developed by firms for use in any CGMP application.
`
`Within your response to this letter, please provide an update on your firm's
`progress toward retaining digital data (observations 23-26). The inspection
`found that many quality control laboratory digital data files were deleted.
`
`6. Change control procedures were inadequate. As an example, significant
`water system changes (e.g., changes in major piping) were not the subject of
`increased testing for purposes of revalidation.
`In addition, when significant
`systems (e.g., air, water, etc.) undergo modifications, the updated
`configuration of the system should be promptly and adequately documented.
`
`7. Water for injection (WFI) sampling was inadequate. Some points of use
`(approximately one-quarter of them) were not sampled, and only three samples
`were taken per week. Please note that at least one sample should be taken
`from the WFI system daily, and. rotation of sampling to agiven WFI takeoff
`point should generally occur more frequently than monthly (as stated in your
`FDA 483 response).
`
`Please clarify each of the above items in your response and address your firm's
`efforts to handle these issues globally.
`Includea timetable of when
`_
`corrections will be completed and supporting documents and translations in
`English. Specifically, we would prefer a report updating the status of each
`commitment (e.g., creation or revision of an SOP; performing training) included in
`your lirm’s April 20 and June 4, 1999 responses.
`
`Finally, we would like to clarify one aspect of FDA 483 observation #20 and
`your associated written response. We consider the person performing the
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Page 3. Orion Pharma. Fl (9610102)
`
`validation studies to be responsible for the integrity of data generated.
`However, it is not a specific GMP-requirement that the data muSt be otherwise
`“evaluated" by this specific individual. “Evaluation" can connote an
`assessment or interpretation of the data in order to reach a conclusion on
`process validity. FDA does not require conclusions on the validity of the
`process to be determined by the same person generating the actual data for the
`study. This critical responsibilityis one which FDA expects to be properly
`discharged by specified personnel of the firm including final review and
`approval by responsible officials of the quality control unit.
`
`The CGMP deviations identified above are rim to be considered an all
`
`inclusive liSt of the deficiencies at your facility. F DA inspection are audits
`which are not intended to determine all deviations fror‘h CGMPs that exists at
`'a firm. We récommend that you continually evaluate the overall CGMP
`compliance of your facility
`
`Until FDA has confirmed that your—firm is in CGMP compliance we will not
`recommend approval of any new drug applications for sterile drugs
`manufactured by this facility.
`
`Please acknowledge your receipt Of this letter. Facsimiles may be sent to (301)
`827-0145. You may contact me at (301) 594-0095 with any questions.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`V t. 1% \
`
`Richard L. Friedman
`
`Compliance Officer
`Investigations and Compliance Branch
`
`

`

`

`

`
`
`fun-21.“.
`
`.
`
`é DEPARTIVIENTOFHEALTH& HUMANSERVICES
`“as,"W
`Memorandum
`
`Public Health Service
`
`FoodandDrugAdninisttab’m
`
`December 1, 1999
`DATE:
`FROM: Albinus M.D'Sa, Ph.D.
`
`CD\
`\
`
`_
`
`TO:
`
`NDA file # 21-038
`
`SUBJECT:
`NDA 21-038, CMC review status
`I amiwriting this memo to'docurnent a telcon that occurred yesterday between David Hussong, Ph.D.
`(Acting Assoc. Director of Microbiology, Acting for Perter Cooney, Ph.D.).
`-
`‘
`
`I indicated to Dr. Hussong that the division was concerned and needed clarification on the comment
`made in the consult review. (page 10, fourth paragraph). The review was done by Patrica Hughes,
`Ph.D., who I was informed no longer works in the Division ofMicrobiology. The comment related
`to the asceptic processing prior to the terminal sterilization of the product. The commient stated that
`this process was not validated and the filters have not been validated for microbial retentivity.
`Dr. Hussong, said that the review conclusion are based on the terminal sterilization process and its
`validation. The lack of information in the asceptic processing such as filter retention is not critical.
`so this was not a problem that he was concerned about. The filtration step does not have to be
`validated because the materials are accepted with low bioburden.
`
`I also inquired during the conversation on the status ofthe inspection consult that chemist had sent
`to Peter Cooney. He indicated that it was completed and we should have already received it.
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`APR 3 0199.0
`
`__~
`REVIEW TO HEB-17o _._..
`OFFICE OF NEW DRUG CHEMISTRY
`
`“
`
`MICROBIOLOGY TEAM
`
`MICROBIOLOGIST REVIEW OF A NDA
`
`27 April 1999
`
`A. NDA 21-038
`
`1
`
`-
`
`”
`
`'PRODUCT NAME: "—-« x (dexmedetomidine HCl) for Infusion
`
`APPLICANT:‘V Abbott Laboratories
`
`Sterile aqueous solution in vials and ampoules for injection;
`DOSAGE FORM:
`.. List No. 1638, 2 mL vial, 100 ug/mL and List 3434 2 mL ampoule, 100
`“gm
`METHOD OF STERILIZATION: Terminal sterilization by autoclave -
`PHARMACOLOGICAL CATEGORY: Alpha-2 sedative with analgesic
`properties for use in an intensive care
`setting.
`
`B.
`
`INITIAL APPLICATION DATE:
`
`18 December 1998
`
`'
`
`'
`
`’ ASSIGNED FOR REVIEW:
`
`11 February 1999
`
`C. REMARKS: A microbiology consult was requested to review the terminal
`sterilization process and the sterility test information. The drug product is a sterile
`aqueous solution filled in vials and ampoules. It is intended to be further diluted with
`0.9% sodium chloride prior to intravenous infusibn. ‘
`‘
`
`-
`
`lexmedetomidine
`D. CONCLUSIONS :’ The‘NDA 21“-038,‘whi'chiprovides for.
`HCl) Injection is recommended forapprovalfrom the standpoint of prod ct quality
`microbiology. Please see section E for Review Notes.
`S
`
`
`
`- 0 ’9 7,
`
`Patricia F. Hughes, Ph. D.
`Review Microbiologist
`
`as. .450 a?
`
`
`
`

`

`J
`
`DEPARTIENT OF HEALTH AND HLMAN SERWCES
`PUBLIC HEALTHSERVIOE
`FOOD AND DRUG AWNISTRATION
`
`REQUEST FOR CONSULTATION
`
`1° “WWW”
`“cal Imaging and RadiOPhafinaceutlca' Drug
`'ucts Dr. Peter Cooney HFD-160 Rm. 188-08
`
`
`
`FROM: Michael Theodorakis, REViewing Chemist
`Anesthetic, Critical Care & Addiction Drug Products
`
`~327.7410
`"5:13.170
`
`
`DATE
`February 5. 1999
`
`NAME OF DRUG
`
`NDA No.
`TYPE OF DOCUMENT
`DATE OF DOCUMENT
`21 -038
`NDA
`12-18-98
`'
`
`DESIRED COMPLETION DATE
`CLASSIFICATION OF DRUG
`PRIORITY CONSIDERATION
`
`
`May 30. 1999
` Routine
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NAME OF FIRM: ‘ Abbott Laboratories
`REASON FOR REQUEST
`
`(dexmedetomidine HCL)
`Injection
`
`-
`
`-‘
`
`0 NEW PROTOCOL
`0 PROGRESS REPORT
`Cl NEW CORRESPONDENCE
`D DRUG ADVERTISING
`O ADVERSE REACTION REPORT
`0 MANUFACTURING CHANGE/ADDITION
`0 MEETING PLANNED BY
`-
`
`L GENERAL
`
`.ESPONSE TO DEFICIENCY LETTER
`El PRE—NDA MEETING
`.4 FINAL PRINTED LABELING
`\
`:1 END OF PHASE II MEETING
`El LABELING REVISION
`c1 RESUBMISSION
`D SAFETY/EFFICACY
`/ $3 D ORIGINAL NEW'CORRESPONDENCE
`x PAPER NDA \ n FORMULATIVE REVIEW
`c1 CONTROLSUPPLEM”
`\C“ OTHER (SPECIFYBELOW):
`I Q\
`,IOMETRICS
`
`STATISTICAL EVALUATION BRANCH
`'°E A OR B NDA REVIEW
`J OF PHASE II MEETING
`JNTROLLED STUDIES
`CI PROTOCOL REVIEW
`O OTHER (SPECIFY BELOW):
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D DISSOLUTION
`CI DEFICIENCY LETTER RESPONSE
`C] BIOAVAILABILTY STUDIES
`D PROTOCOL-BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`
`0 PHASE IV STUDIES
`D lN-VIVO WAIVER REQUEST
`
`
`
`IV. DRUG EXPERIENCE
`
`STATISTICAL APPLICATIo . BRANCH. ..
`13 CHEMISTRY REVIEW
`D PHARMACOLOGY
`CI BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`Cl OTHER (SPECIFY BELOW):
`
`0 PHASE IV SURVEILLANCE/EPIDEMIOLOGY PROTOCOL
`D DRUG USE e.g. POPULATION EXPOSURE. ASSOCIATED DIAGNOSES
`0 CASE REPORTS OF SPECIFIC REACTIONS (Us! below)
`Cl COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT ON GENERIC DRUG GROUP
`
`D REVIEW OF MARKETING EXPERIENCE. DRUG USE AND SAFETY
`[I SUMMARY OF ADVERSE EXPERIENCE
`D POISON RICK ANALYSIS
`
`‘
`
`' V. SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS
`
`Cl PRECLINICAL
`U CUNICAL
`COM MENTSISPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
`_
`
`This is a terminally sterilized small volume injection. Please review the sterilization
`process and sterility testing information.
`
`
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I ‘
`
`'
`
`fInNATI IRF m: RFOUESTER
`\
`
`__..
`E: 1;"I “‘1’
`...IcnaeI u. meo- . KIS, r.n.u.
`SIGW‘:h "5":_—nm:"g“r_: 29
`‘
`9/“
`
`W"
`
`METHOD OF DELIVERY (Check one)
`U MAIL
`D HAND
`
`SIGNATURE OF DELIVERER
`
`
`
`

`

`O3-DEC-1999
`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Page
`
`i of
`
`[\J
`
`NDA 21038/000
`Application:
`Stamp: ~1-8-DEC-1998 Regulatory Due:
`Applicant:
`ABBOTT LABS
`200 ABBOTT PARK RD D389 BLDG A '
`ABBOTT PARK, IL 600643537
`
`lS-JAN-2000
`
`‘
`
`Org Code: 170
`IS
`Priority:
`19-NOV-]999
`District Goal:
`Action Goal:
`Brand Name: ’V. EXMEDETOMIDINE
`HCL)100MCG/ML I
`Established Name:
`
`GenericName: DEXMEDETOMIDINE HCL
`Dosage Form:
`INJ
`(INJECTION)
`Strength:
`100 MCG/ML
`
`* —
`
`301-827-7410 , Project Manager
`(HEB-170)
`S. SAMANTA
`FDA Contacts:
`-
`M. THE’ODORAKIS (HEB-170)
`301-827-7425 , Review Chemist
`.
`A. D SA
`(HFD-170)
`301-827-7443 , Team Leader
`
`Overall Recommendation:
`
`ACCEPTABLE on 19-NOV-1999 by M. EGAS (HFD-322)301-594-0095
`
`Establishment: 1021343
`DMF No: "K
`ABBOTT LABORATORIES
`AADA No:
`HWY 301 NORTH
`
`ROCKY MOUNT, NC 27804
`
`OAI Status: NONE
`SVT
`Profile:
`Last Milestone: OC RECOMMENDATION
`Milestone Date
`20-MAY-1999
`
`Decision:
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`Responsibilities: FINISHED DOSAGE
`.
`MANUFACTURER
`
`—M_—__—h_—_—_——_—“ -.
`Establishment: 1411365
`DME No: A
`_
`ABBOTT LABORATORIES
`AADA NO:
`1401 14TH & SHERIDAN ROAD
`
`NORTH CHICAGO, IL 60064
`
`OAl Status: NONE
`Profile: CTL
`Last Milestone: OC RECOMMENDATION
`Milestone Date
`03-FEB-1999
`Decision:
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`Reason:
`
`BASED ON PROFILE
`
`Responsibilities: FINISHED DOSAGE STABILITY
`TESTER
`
`.
`
`Establishment: 9610102
`ORION CORP LTD
`FERMION KOIVUMANKKAANTIE 6
`ESPOO, , P]
`
`DMF No:
`AADA No:
`
`/’\/—
`
`‘
`
`OAI Status: NONE
`Profile: CSS
`Last Milestone: OC RECOMMENDATION
`Milestone Date
`19-Nov-1999
`
`Responsibilities: DRUG SUBSTANCE
`MANUFACTURER
`
`—
`
`—
`
`
`
`

`

`o3-DEC-1999
`
`‘
`
`FDA CDER EES
`ESTABLISHMENT EVALUATION REQUEST
`SUMMARY REPORT
`
`Page
`
`2 of
`
`I‘J
`
`Decision:
`
`ACCEPTABLE
`
`_
`
`Reason:
`
`DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION
`
`
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`M E M O R A N D U M »
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES
`
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Date:
`
`June 451999
`
`.- ~-
`
`T'oi
`
`Food~ and Drug Administration, Pre-apprOval Laboratories
`
`1" Laboratory
`
`Division of Testing and Applied Analytical Development, HFD-920
`1114 Market Street, Room 1002
`
`St. Louis, MO 63101
`Attention: Harry Coffman
`
`2"d Laboratog
`
`Philadelphia District Laboratory, HFR-MA160
`US Customhouse
`-
`
`2nd and Chestnut Streets, Room 900
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19106
`Attention: Nicholas Falcone
`
`From:
`
`Michael Theodorakis, Ph.D. Senior Review Chemist, HFD-170,- I” a T
`Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care, and Addiction Drug Products, CDE
`
`6/4/7 ¢
`R
`
`Through:
`
`M {7
`Albinus D'Sa, Ph.D., Chemistry Team Leader, HFD-170,
`Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care, and Addiction Drug Products, CDB
`
`Subject:
`
`Laboratory Assignments for NDA Methods Validation (MV)
`
`NDA No:
`
`21-038
`
`Product:
`
`‘M' .' (dexmedetomidine HCl) lnjection
`
`Applicant:
`
`Abbott Laboratories,
`200 Abbott Park Road
`
`Abbott Park, IL 600064-3537
`Attn: Thomas F. Willer, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Regulatory Affairs,
`tel. 847-937-6845
`'
`
`

`

`Please find attached an amendment to NDA 21-038 that contains revisions for the following
`analytical procedures:
`
`a. 74762 Dexmedetomidine HCl
`b. C-168l Deterrnination and Identification of Deirn'edetomidine and Related Substances
`in Bulk Drug and Injection.
`
`.This amendment should become part of the MV package for NDA 21-038 that was mailed to
`your labs on March 17,1999.
`
`Enclosures
`
`cc:
`
`Original NDA 21-038
`HFD-l 70 Division File
`
`1 —
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`0N ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`. Application
`
`Establishments
`
`Establishment
`; CFN
`Name
`
`‘
`
`Overa" Compliance:
`Date
`
`Alert '
`
`‘—‘-Last<:ompnance
`:Status,..-Date
`
`'Code Name
`
`‘
`" .'
`
`"
`
`"
`w -
`
`_
`
`- l__'_' I
`
`'nll'hbb_'
`
`OAl
`
`.Ji
`1%;
`
`g'1:
`
`L1:
`
`APPEARS nus WAY
`on ORIGINAL
`
`

`

`M E M O R A N D U M
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES
`
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Date:
`
`-
`
`June 4, .1999
`
`I
`
`-
`
`To:
`
`'
`
`Food and Drug Administration, Pre-approval Laboratories
`
`1" Laboratory
`
`Division of Testing and Applied Analytical'Development, HFD-920
`1114 Market Street, Room 1002
`
`'
`
`St. Louis, MO 63101
`Attention: Harry Coffman
`
`2“d Laboratog
`
`Philadelphia District Laboratory, HFR—MA160
`US Customhouse
`
`2nd and Chestnut Streets, Room 900
`
`Philadelphia, PA 19106
`Attention: Nicholas Falcone
`
`From:
`
`Through:
`
`Michael Theodorakis, Ph.D. Senior Review Chemist, HFD-17O,~ /’7 0T 6/4/7 /
`
`~
`
`(
`
`Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care, and Addiction Drug Products, CDER
`.
`\
`7 /UI' I)! A
`Albinus D'Sa, Ph.D., Chemistry Team Leader, HFD-170,
`M { ‘
`~‘/‘//? 1}
`Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care, and Addiction Drug Products, CDER 6
`
`Subject:
`
`Laboratory Assignments for NDA Methods Validation (MV)
`
`NDA No:
`
`21-038
`
`Product: /-\
`
`\dexmedetomidine HCI) Injection
`
`Applicant: Abbott Laboratories,
`200 Abbott Park Road
`
`Abbott Park, IL‘ 600064-3537
`Attn: Thomas F. Willer, Ph.D., Assistant Director, Regulatory Affairs,
`tel. 847-937-6845
`
`
`
`

`

`Please-find attached an amendment to NDA 21-038 that contains revisions-for the following
`analytical procedures:
`
`a. 74762 Dexmedetomidine HCl
`
`b. C-l681 Determination and Identification of Dexmedetomidine and Related Substances
`in Bulk Drug and Injection.
`
`This amendment should become part of the MV package for NDA 21-038 that was mailed to
`your labs on March‘1-7, 1999.
`
`Enclosures
`
`cc:
`
`Original NDA 21-038
`HFD—l 70 Division File
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`on ORlGlNAL
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket