throbber
NDA 21-038
`
`Table 253-1 :
`
`Mean Distribution of Metabolites after Incubation of [’HJMedetomidine,
`[’HJDexmedetomidine and [’H]Levomedetomidine with Human Liver Slices
`Wm
`
`‘-
`
`3‘”
`
`Metabolite
`
`G-Dex-l
`G-Dex-Z
`G-levo
`
`COOH
`OH
`G-OH
`
`’
`
`‘
`
`-
`
`Medetormidine Dexmedetomidine __Levomedetomidine
`(n=2>
`may
`man
`14.32
`22.39
`0.67
`9.32
`14.69
`2.06
`44.60
`t
`71.30
`
`0.40
`2.08
`0.61
`
`1.02
`_
`"10.81
`1.56
`
`0.27
`1.14
`0.29
`
`nd
`nd
`2.52
`0.57
`21.20 '
`83.02
`
`' —
`
`nd
`nd
`10.77
`1.54
`37.22
`54.43
`
`_
`
`._
`
`nd
`$0,011
`nd
`M-QH
`2.73
`N-Me'thyl
`1.05
`H-1
`24.91
`Other
`78.39
`Turnover (%)
`G-Dex-l == N-glucuronide of dexmedetomidine
`G-Dex-2 = N-glucuronide of dexmedetomidine
`G-Levo = N-glucuronide of levomedetomidine
`COOH = carboxylic acid metabolite (MPV-l306)
`OH = hydroxy metabolite (MPV-l305)
`G-OH=_ O-glucuronide of the hydroxy metabolite
`$0,011 = sulfate conjugate of the hydroxy metabolite
`M-OH = mercapturic acid conjugate of the hydroxy metabolite
`methyl N-methylated metabolite (MIN-1709)
`PM = glucuronide of the hydroxylated N-methyl metabolite
`Turnover = % Parent drug converted to metabolites
`t = trace nd = not detected
`
`Table 253-2:
`
`-
`
`_
`
`Variability in the Rate of [’HIDexmedetomidine Glucuronidation
`in a Panel of Twenty-One Human Liver Microsomes
`pmol/min/mg protein
`G-Dex-l
`5.82
`2,61
`‘ 38.00
`65.92
`
`Subject ID
`EGF426‘
`FAG771
`FBI779
`EFESS6
`
`‘.
`
`G-Dex- 2
`m
`6.11
`24.42
`40.17
`
`FGL852
`F1w309
`FRX710‘
`GC4476
`GDD565
`GEQS91
`GFE060
`615562
`
`HAK163
`
`27.00
`86.50
`45.58
`49.33
`11.08
`75.08
`93.25
`12.25
`
`27.83
`
`-
`
`_ 17.67
`56.17
`30.67
`30.00
`8.42
`45.33
`59.67
`8.67
`
`18.75
`
`G- l/G-Z
`1.46
`1.57
`1.56
`1.64
`
`1.53
`1.54
`1.49
`1.64
`1.32
`1.66
`1.56
`1.41
`
`1.48
`
`“ —
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`GLT656
`
`13.67
`
`_
`
`'
`
`'Z'
`
`1.1.5.18.
`HOD057‘
`17.42
`HIFl812
`125.11
`HF0125951
`36.75
`ICF119
`63.83
`IEG710
`71.08
`lENOlG
`46.25
`1154420
`49.38
`Mean .
`35.30
`SD.
`‘ received known inducers of UDPGT activity
`
`..
`
`..
`
`9.75
`
`11.25
`10.17
`18.25
`22.83
`40:25::
`43.92
`29.58
`31.34
`22.02
`
`-'-
`
`1.40
`
`1.59
`1.71
`1.59
`1.61
`1.59
`- 1.62
`1.56
`1.55
`0.10
`
`The underlined values in the above table are demonstration of the extremes in rates of
`glucurinidatioriamong human subjects 5.83 to 124.17 pmol/min/mg protein, >20 fold difference.
`
`Table 253-3:
`
`Summary of the Kinetic Parametersfor the Glucuronidation of
`Dexmedetomidine by Human Liver Microsomes
`glucuronidation
`Subject 1.D.
`Reaction
`ICF
`Dex-l
`3.83
`3
`1 826
`0.22
`
`Parameter'
`Km (mM)
`Vmax (pmol/min/mg)
`Vmax/Km (rnL/min/rng)
`
`._
`
`EFE
`2.64
`1937
`0.73
`
`.
`
`Dex-2
`
`Km(mM)
`Vmax (pmol/min/mg)
`Vmax/Km (rnL/min/rng)
`
`1.57
`
`2.15
`
`2.61
`
`592
`0.38
`
`334
`0.16
`
`‘units for Vmax and Vrnax/Km are expressed relative to mg of microsomal pretein
`
`GDD
`1.67
`268
`0.16
`
`Mean +SD
`2.71+ 1.08
`1010 + 849
`0.37 + 0.32
`
`2.11+0.52
`332
`0.13
`
`420 + 150
`0.22 +0.14
`
`Summary
`The metabolism of dexrnedetomidine by human liver slices and human liver microsomal
`preparations indicated that the direct N-glucuronidation was a significant route of metabolism.
`and the metabolic profile is qualitatively similar to in viva results from human plasma and urine.
`There is a 10 fold difference between subjects in the extent-ofN-glucuronidation, but the ratio of
`the metabolites for each nitrogen is relative constant and indicates the preferential
`glucuronidation at one ofthe irnidazole nitrogen versus the other but apparently both by the same
`enzyme. [Metabolic pathways: page 72 (rat) and page 100 (human)]
`
`—
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`[41]
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.36 -
`Shim:
`Identification of cytochrome P450 isoforms involved in the oxidative metabolism of
`dexmedetomidine (Abbott-85499) and the effectmf dexmedetomidine on
`cytochrome P450-mediated monooxygenase activities
`
`Study No: 'Report No. R&D/97/7S7
`W.“
`W: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`W' Janualy 1998..
`
`(#254)
`
`-
`
`. Methgds:
`Human Liver Microsomes: The human livers of transplant quality were obtained fiom
`M The liver tissue samples
`were received within 24 hrs of removal. The fact that CYP2D6 may have a role1n
`dexmedetomidine metabolism was addressed by preparing liver microsomes from an extensive
`metabolizer (1131211961, male) and a poor metabolizer (113415961, male). The tissue was
`homogenized, centrifuged and the microsomal pellets resuspended in phosphate buffer and stored
`at -7;O?C-unti1 use in incubations for studies. The microsome incubations with dexmedetomidine
`
`was stopped, centrifuged and the supematants analyzed '
`
`cDNA--Expressed CYP proteins: Microsomes prepared fi'om B--lymphoblastoid cells containing
`cDNA--expressed CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6,CYP2C9,CYP2C19,CYP2D6,CYPE1,
`CYP3A4 and CPY4A11 were obtained fi’omW“ 1 .'he
`microsome incubations with dexmedetomidine was stopped, centrifuged and the supematants
`analyzed by 1 “CH.
`
`-
`
`Selective CYP2A6 Antibody: Inhibition of metabolism of [3H]-dexmedetomidine by a selective
`CYP2A6 monoclonal antibody to provide more evidence of this isozyme in the in vitro
`
`metabolism. The antibody was supplied by
`
`W113 Medetomidine, with tritium on the bridge methyl group,
`
`was synthesized by
`ad the dexmedetomidine (Lot #50498-ST-108; 66 Ci/mmol)
`was separated at Abbott by chiral chromatography. Unlabeled dexmedetomidine (Lot #031940-
`002) were added to the labeled compounds only to provide final incubation concentrations
`greater than 0.05uM. The radiochemical purity wasW.
`
`Results:
`
`This study was done to identify which P450 isozymes were involved in dexmedetomidine
`metabolism and to examine the effects of dexmedetomidine on the isofonn~specific cytochrome
`
`—<
`
`86
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`P450 mediated reactions.
`
`Oxidative metabolites: The chromatograph of dexmedetomidine metabolites, in the presence of
`NADPH, typically demonstrated two major metabolic peaks. One of these peaks was identified
`as MPV— 1305, the phenyl-3--hydroxymethyl metabolite ofthe parent and a late eluting peak was
`tentatively identified as the methylene bridge hydroxymethyl, identified as the probable H-3
`metabolite detected1n human plasma in viva.
`
`Inhibition studies: The inhibition of CYP2A6 by 8-methoxypsoralen inhibited the formation of
`both hydroxymethyl metabolites, MVP- 1305 and H-3 by 40 to 60%. However the inhibition of
`this enzyme by coumarin, inhibited the formation of MVP- 1305 by more than 30% but of H-3 by
`less than 10%. Selective inhibition of CYP3A decrease MVP-' 1305 formation by 34%1n one
`prep but only 3%1n the other microsomal preparation.
`
`Metabolism by cDNA--Expressed Proteins: CYP2D6 and 2A6 exhibited the highest rates of
`hydroxylation to the MVP-1305 metabolite of dexmedetomidine. The CYPZEI and CYP2D6
`were the most active P4505 for formation of H3 metabolite.
`
`The following tables present the results obtained (V45/pl324-5)
`
`Hydroxylation ofDexmedctormdme1n the Presence of Human
`Table 254-1
`B--Lymphoblastoid Cell Microsomes Containing cDNA-Expressed CYP Proteins
`
`12
`
`l
`
`'I'HI
`
`I'
`
`[511112
`
`!
`
`'l'fll
`
`'I'
`
`[MEN]
`
`CYP Form
`
`1A2
`2B6
`2C8
`2C9-arg
`2C19
`2D6-val
`2131
`3A4
`2A6
`4A1 1
`Control'
`2
`
`MPV-l305
`prnol/hr/pmol
`ND
`ND
`0.204
`ND
`0.295
`4.261
`0.467
`0.506
`1.770
`ND
`ND
`
`'
`H-3
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.162
`0.044
`ND
`0.742
`ND
`1.7t1
`2.781
`0.955
`0.206
`0.306
`ND
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`MPV-l305
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.002
`0.004
`0.008
`ND
`0.141 '
`0.664
`0.008
`0.079
`0.058
`ND
`ND
`
`,
`
`'
`
`-
`
`-.
`
`H-3“
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.004
`0.060
`ND
`0.002
`ND
`0.002
`0.049
`0.054
`0.005
`ND
`ND_
`
`Microsomes prepared from cells devoid of CYP
`ND =No activity detected
`
`WWWHWWWM
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Dexmedetomidine inhibition of Cytochrome P4505: The inhibition was most evident on
`CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYPBA, all less than luM. The ICso values are presented in Table 254-3
`below. The CYP2C9 has a major role in the metabolism of phenytoin, warfarin and NSAIDS.
`CYP2D6 is involved in metabolism of compounds like codeine and hydroxycodone and the type
`of dexmedetomidine inhibition appears to be mixed, competitive and non-competitive. It is a
`polymorphic enzyme and about 5% of caucasians, 2% of asians and africans are deficient in this
`enzyme. CYP3A, the major form of CYP3 in adults, is about 33% of the total P450 isozymes
`and it-playsa role in sex steroid metabolism, e.g. testosterone. Dexmedetomidine also potently
`inhibits the N-demethyl'ation of ketamine in human liver microsomes with a Ki of 0.4 uM. The
`CYP involved in this reaction has not been identified.
`
`Hydroxylation of Dexrnedetornidine in the Presence offiurnan
`Table 254-2
`‘
`B-Lymph’oblastoid Cell Mierosomes Containing cDNA-Expressed CYP Proteins
`
`11
`
`1.1.“!
`
`l‘
`
`:5”:
`
`1.1."!
`
`1'
`
`ICE:
`
`CYP Form
`
`MPV-1305
`
`H-3 -
`
`1A2
`2B6
`2C8
`2C9-arg -
`2Cl9
`2D6-val
`2131
`3A4
`2A6
`4A1 1
`Control'
`2
`
`pmol/hr/pmol
`ND
`ND
`0.204
`ND
`0.295
`4.26]
`0.467
`0.506
`- 1.770
`ND
`ND
`
`-
`
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.162
`0.044
`ND
`' 0.742
`ND
`1.7tl
`2.78]
`0.955
`0.206
`0.306
`ND
`
`MPV-1305
`
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.002
`0.004
`0.008
`2 ND
`0.141
`0.664
`0.008
`0.079
`0.058
`1 ND
`ND
`
`.
`
`H-3
`
`pmol/hr/pmol
`0.004
`0.060
`ND
`0.002
`ND
`0.002
`0.049
`0.054
`0.005
`ND 1
`ND
`
`Microsomes prepared from cells devoid of CYP
`
`ND = No activity detected
`
`WWWWWW—W
`
`Summary
`The CYP2A6 is apparently the largest contributor to dexmedetomidine hydroxylation in vitro in
`human microsomes to the metabolites MPV-1305 and H-3, the 3-hydroxymethyl and the bridge
`carbon hydroxylation, respectively. The CYP inhibition by dexmedetomidine affects several
`isozymes, most potently CYP2C9 (0.2uM ICSO), CYP3A4 (0.65uM 1C”), and CYP2D6 (0.4 uM
`1C50). The sponsor cites clinical data indicating the therapeutic blood level are 0.04 uM or less
`and claims this precludes any role of dexmedetomidine in metabolism of concomitant drugs.
`However, the ADME study with labeled dexmedetomidine demonstrated that, upon a single
`administration, the liver concentrations were nearly 100X the peak plasma concentrations. Since
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`the metabolising P4505 are mainly in the liver, there remains the possibility that
`dexmedetomidine can interfere with the metabolism of concomitant medications, especially afier
`prolonged administration. The latter situation has not been studied, although it has been -
`proposed in clinical protocols. Studies to address this concern have been proposed by the
`sponsor, approved by the division and are to be done in thenear future.
`
`
`
`_
`
`M15:
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.13 -
`“ The1n vitro interaction of dexmedetomidine with human liver
`
`microsomal cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6)
`
`Study N91 Report No. R&D/96/557
`_
`VQI £515, pggg £1 22:
`WW: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`Wagon: August 1996
`
`(#258)
`,
`
`Mghgds: The human livers of transplant quality were obtained
`—- m t..The liver tissue samples were received within 24 hrs
`of removal. The tissue was homogenized, centrifuged and the microsomal pellets resuspendedin
`phOsphate buffer and stored at -70°C until use in incubations for studies. The microsome
`incubations with dexmedetomidine was stopped, centrifuged and the supematants analyzed by
`‘\-— '.[0--methyl l‘C] dextromethorphan was also used~as a substrate.
`W: Microsomes prepared from B--lyrnphoblastoid cells’containing
`
`
`
`cDNA-expressed CYP2D6-Val were obtained fromM The
`microsome incubations with dexmedetomidine was stopped, centrifuged and the supematants
`analyzed by /____________\
`WWW: [O-methyl l‘C] dextromethorphan was synthesized by
`. _.w '
`The unlabeled dexmedetomidine, Lot
`#295260-0-AX “A -'y and the quinidine, Lot #01831KW fromku- ~-—-——-
`
`~A'\m WC]HCHO, 30.1 mCi/mmol, was purchased from
`
`mm:
`
`The effects of dexmedetomidine on the Dextromethorphan O-demethylase, CYP21_)6, was
`studied in vitro. The Table 258-1 presents the IC,0 values for dexmedetomidine and quinidine.
`Although quinidine is about 7-times more potent, dexmedetomidine's K. was still in range of 1
`uM.
`
`

`

`NDA 21-03::
`
`Table 258-1:
`
`:
`i
`
`Inhibition of Dextromethorphan O-Demethylase Activity in the
`Presence of Dexmedetomidine or Quinidine
`__ICm.i.uMl'_
`I
`.l.
`
`II:
`S 1'
`Human Liver Microsomes
`HFO
`GC4
`FRX
`HAK
`ICF
`Mean :t SD‘
`Projected K, (uM)d
`cDNA-Expressed CYP2D6‘
`
`;
`
`'
`
`;
`
`E
`
`,
`'
`
`.
`
`1.3
`1.2
`1.5
`1.5
`11.2
`1.3 i 0.25
`0.70
`2.0
`
`1 ~13
`
`_
`
`i
`
`’. '
`
`C
`
`.
`
`.1.
`
`0.18
`b
`b
`0.16
`m
`0.18 :t 0.02
`0.09
`0.15
`
`;
`b
`
`1C”: Concentration of quinidine or dexmedetomidine required to inhibit activity by 50%.
`The final concentration of DEXTRO approximated apparent Km.
`Not determined.
`c Mean :e standard deviation.
`‘ Assuming competitive inhibition. When substrate concentration = Km, [Cg/2 = K,.
`e Human B-lymphoblastoid cell microsomes containing cDNA-expressed wild type CYP2D6.
`WWWWWWW
`
`Table 2582
`
`._
`
`I. Inhibition Constants Characterizing the Inhibition of Human Liver Microsomal Dextromethorphan 0~
`Demethylase Activity in the Presence of Dexmedetomidine or Quinidine
`W
`HE
`
`Hammers:
`Dexmedetomidine
`
`lCE
`
`514.
`
`Mean 1 512b
`
`'
`
`0.2
`3.2
`16
`
`K;(uM)
`K.“ (uM)
`Alpha
`Quinidine
`Ki (uM)
`0.05
`0.08
`C
`0.07‘
`'
`l(,-. Km and a (Kies/Ki) were determined using Dixon and Cornish-Bowden plots. Dexmedetomidine behaved as
`a mixed (competitive/noncompetitive) inhibitor (Kt? Kigalpha >1) and quinidine exhibited competitive
`inhibition.
`" Mean + SD of three livers.
`‘ Not determined.
`
`0.5
`2.2
`4.4
`
`:
`
`0.4
`1.5
`3.9
`
`'
`
`_
`
`0.4 i 0.2
`2.3 :t 09
`8.1 i 6.8
`
`Summary
`The potent inhibition of CYP2D6 by dexmedetomidine was as a reversible mixed
`(competitive/non-competitive) inhibitor and quinidine, a competitive inhibitor, was 6-7 times
`more potent. The sponsor again cites that the expected plasma levels of dexmedetomidine
`(0.04uM) is much lower than the IC,0 (1.3uM). However, upon single administration of labeled
`dexmedetomidine to the rat, the liver concentration eitceeded the peak plasma level by nearly two
`orders of magnitude. There has been no study to evaluate possible liver accumulation and yet the
`sponsor has proposed 5 consecutive days of dexmedetomidine infusion. The CYP inhibition by
`dexmedetomidine could produce significant changes in metabolism of concomitant medications
`if there is any liver accumulation of the parent compound or active metabolites.
`W' .......................................
`........................................
`..................
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`[43]
`
`-
`
`We:
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.8 -
`In vitro protein binding of [3H]Abbott-854991dexmedetomidine) in
`mouse, rat, dog, monkey, and human plasma (Protocol V96-004)
`
`(#242)
`
`Sim: : V96-004; Report No. R&D/96/320
`W:
`W: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`MW: July 1996
`Methods: Blood samples were obtained fi'om both sexes of mice (CD, Charles Rivers); rats
`1(Sprague-Dawl'ey, Sasco), beagle dogs (Marshall Research Farms), cynomolgus monkeys
`(Charles Rivers), and human volunteers. The heparinized blood was centifuged to separate the
`plasma and appropriate drug solutions were added to the plasma. The solutions Were incubated
`at 37°C in shaking water baths and placed in a centrifuge devise that provided ultrafiltration
`during centrifugation. The filtrates were extracted with acetonitrile and analyzed
`chromatographically.
`WW: Medetomidine HCl, with tritium on the bridge methyl
`group, was synthesized by. C-.\« l and the dexmedetomidineisomer was separated at Abbott
`by Chiral chromatography. (Lot #53863MK-085 (80 Ci/mmol; 331 uCi/ug, 1.1 ug/ml).
`Unlabeled dexmedetomidine (Lot #295260--0-AX), was added to the labeled dexmedetomidine
`HCl to provide a solution of 10, 5, 2.5 and 1.0 ug salt/ml dose solution. The radiochemical
`lM.
`
`Results:
`The protein binding results are presented in the following table copied from the submission
`(V43/p146):
`
`APPEARS THIS WAY
`ON ORIGINAL
`
`Table 242-1 :
`
`Summary of the In Vitro Protein Binding of [’H]Abbott—85499 in
`Mouse, Rat, Dog, Monkey and Human Plasma
`
`91‘
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA21-038
`
`.
`
`Mouse
`
`Rat
`
`Dog
`
`.
`
`Monkey
`
`-
`
`5'
`
`-
`
`-.
`
`'
`
`Human
`
`-.
`
`'
`
`Saline
`
`Sex
`
`Mean‘
`SD
`
`Mean'
`SD
`
`Mean'
`SD
`
`Meanl
`
`SD
`
`Mean‘
`SD
`
`0
`
`E
`
`. E‘
`
`1‘
`
`94.89
`0.18
`
`88.16:
`0.31
`
`92.58
`0.28
`
`84.59
`
`0.48
`
`J
`
`93.72
`0.40
`
`—
`
`4 Day Mean
`SD
`
`3.20
`3.10
`
`SD = Standard Deviation
`‘ Means are calculated from the male and female results of each concentration tested.
`
`Summary:
`Theibi’nding in males and females was similar in all‘ species and the percent plasma protein
`binding ranged from a mean of 84.6% in monkeys to 94.9% in mice and in humans the mean
`binding was 93.7%.
`
`
`
`Study;
`
`_ Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.20 -
`In vitro binding of [’H]Abbott-85499 (dexmedetomidine) to human serum albumin
`and “1° glycoprotein (Protocol V96-0 11)
`
`(#243)
`
`Study N9: Report No.R&D/97/338
`V9! M3, page filfil:
`WW: Abbott Laboratories Division 46. Abbott Park, IL
`MM: June 1997
`Methods: Human serum albumin and alphal-acid glycoproteins were obtained flowa V
`\-\__ and dissolvedin phosphate buffer. The protein binding was determined by an
`ultrafiltration technique. The solutions were incubated at 37°Cin shaking water baths and
`placed in a centrifuge devise that provided ultrafiltration during centrifugation. The filtrates were
`extracted with acetonitrile and analyzed chromatographically. The radioassay of the proteins was
`in a liquid scintillation analyzer.
`
`92
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`W: Medetomidine HCI, with tritium on the bridge methyl
`group, was synthesized it? .1 and the dexmedetomidine isomer was separated at Abbott
`by chiral chromatography. (Lot #53863-MK-085; 80 mcCi/rnmol) Unlabeled dexmedetomidine,
`Lot #295260-0-AX, was added to the labeled dexmedetomidine HCl
`to provide a solution of
`8.5, 4.25, 2.125 and 0.85 ug free base/m1. The radiochemical fl' /o.
`
`:
`
`Results:
`
`The-resultsare presented in the following tables from the submission (V43/p173-177):’-
`Table 243-2:
`2
`-'
`
`In Vitro Binding of [’H]Abbott-85499
`,
`(Dcxmedetomidine) to Human Serum Albumin (BSA) and
`a,-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) at Normal Physiological Concentrations ‘ '
`
`Dexmedetomidine
`Maxim]!
`
`Sample
`
`Percent [3HJA-85499 Bound‘
`HSA"
`AAQC
`HSAZAAQ‘
`
`0.85
`
`8.5
`
`:
`
`.-
`
`21.25
`
`42.5
`
`85
`
`1
`2
`Mean
`
`l
`2
`Mean
`
`1
`
`Mean
`
`1
`
`Mean
`
`1
`2
`
`0.85 - 85
`
`Mean
`
`Mean
`
`80.65
`8.0.61
`80.64
`
`80.83
`8.1.92
`80.96
`
`80.39
`82.12
`80.48
`
`81.24
`
`89.29
`81.07
`
`80.47
`8.0.70
`80.59
`
`65.22
`65.52
`65.39
`
`63.97
`m2
`64.33
`
`63.85
`$.92
`63:97
`
`62.48
`
`'
`
`' 63.53
`63.00
`
`. 62.97
`__§3..2§
`63.12
`
`‘
`
`81.94
`81.15
`81.85
`
`~
`
`82.49
`82.5.2
`82.46
`
`82.01
`82.12
`82.10
`
`82.24
`
`82.32
`82.32
`
`82.34
`82.59
`82.37
`
`63.96
`80.75
`‘EAs determined by an ultrafiltration technique.
`5 Buffer solution (0.067 M phosphate, pH 7.4) containing 40 ngml human serum albumin.
`cBuffer solution (0.067 M phosphate. pH 7.4) containing 0.8 mg/ml a,-acid glycoprotein.
`‘Buffer solution (0.067 M phosphate. pH 7.4) containing 40 mg/ml human serum albumin
`and 0.8 myml a,-acid glycoprotein.
`
`82.22
`
`WWW-WWW
`
`93
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`Summary:
`.[3H] Dexmedetomidine wasexamined in vitro for binding to serum albumin and a-acid
`glycoproteins by an ultrafiltration technique. The concentation of dexmedetomidine was
`evaluated between 0.85 and 85 ng/ml and the concentrations of albumin and ail-acid
`glycoproteins were varied to approximate clinical disease state conditions. The results indicate
`that dexmedetomidine may have slightly higher unbound levels in the disease states which
`substantially lower serum albumin levels. An elevated capacid glycoprotein level can ameliorate
`this reduced binding and if these levels are reduced, the unbound fraction would be expected to‘
`furtherincrease.
`
`
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.29 -
`W3
`Protein binding interactions betw_een Abbott-85499-3H (dexmedetomidine) and selected
`other drugs in human plasma (Protocol V97-034)
`
`(#244)
`
`Study No: Report No. R&Dl971525
`.‘
`Vgl £3, and page #182:
`WWW: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`MW: Report No. R&Dl971525
`
`Mflhgdii Blood was obtained from male and female voluteers who had fasted for at least 8 hours
`and had taken no medicine other than aspirin in the last week and no salicylates within the last 48
`hours. The heparinized samples were centrifuged and the plasma frozen until use.
`
`The protein binding was determined by an ultrafiltration technique. The solutions (as specified
`under Results:) were incubated at 37°C in shaking water baths and placed in a centrifuge devise
`that provided ultrafiltration during centrifugation. The filtrates were extracted with acetonitrile
`and analyzed chromatographically. The radioassay of the proteins was in a liquid scintillation
`analyzer.
`
`WWW: Mcdetomidine HCl with tritium on the
`bridge methyl group, was synthesized '*
`nd the dexmedetomidineisomer was
`separated at Abbott by chiral chromatography. (Lot #55585-st-108; 66 Ci/mmol). The
`W.
`
`Resins:
`
`The results are presented on the following table from the submission (v43/p184):
`
`94
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`mm
`Control‘
`+ Fenianyl
`+ Ketorolac
`+ Theophylline
`+ Digoxin
`+ Lidocaine ,
`‘ = f 50% Ethanol
`
`-."
`
`,_
`
`Bgund
`92.71
`92.61
`92.50
`92.58
`92.66
`91.79
`
`% A85499-’H
`
`,. Communion
`0.6 ng/ml
`3.0 ng/ml
`3.0 ug/ml -. _-.-.
`20.0 ug/ml
`3.0 ug/ml
`6.0 uglm]
`
`Snmmamt
`The effects of fentanyl, ketorolac, theophylline, digoxin and lidocane on the in vitro protein
`:binding of dexmedetomidine was minimal. There were no differences1n binding as great as 1%.
`
`
`[46]
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.30 -
`m:
`Effect of Abbott-85499 (dexmedetomidine) on the protein binding of selected other
`drugs in human plasma (Protocol V97-027)
`
`Stud3; No: Report No. R&D/971526
`Vglfii, page12:32!”
`Wm: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`mm: September 1997
`
`~
`
`2
`
`(#245)
`
`Methods: Unlabeled dexmedetomidine, 0.06 ug base/m1 saline was the test concentration. Blood
`was obtained from male and female volunteers who had fasted for at least 8 hours and had taken
`no medicine other than aspirin in the last week and no salicylates within the last 48 hours. The
`heparinized samples were centrifuged and the plasma frozen until use.
`
`The protein binding was determined by an
`. The solutions of plasma and
`test drugs were incubated at 37°Cin shaking water baths for 15 minutes. The samples were then
`divided in two portions and one recieved an aliquot of normal saline and the other the unlabed
`dexmedetomidine. After an hour of additional agitation at 37°C, the samples were placed1n a
`centrifuge devise thatprovided ultrafiltration. The filtrates were extracted with acetonitrile and
`analyzed chromatographically. The radioassay of the proteins was in a liquid scintillation
`analyzer.
`—
`
`Wm: Tritium labeled ibuprofen (lOug/ml), theophylline
`(ZOug/ml), propanolol (0.0211g/ml), and digoxin (3ng/ml) were used and I‘C-labeled phenytoin
`(1611 g/ml) and warfarin (1011g/ml)were also test solutions. Unlabeled dexmedetomidine
`(0.6ng/ml) (lot #2952609-0-AX). Radiochemical purity was -m-
`
`95
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Results:
`-
`None of the tested compounds appeared to be significantly displaced by dexmedetomidine (0.6
`ng/ml). There was no significant differences between the sexes. The combined results are
`presented on the following table from the submission (v43/p203).
`Table 245-1:
`
`Radiolabeled
`Drug
`._
`Phenytoin
`Warfarin
`Ibuprofen
`Propranolol
`Theophylline
`.Digoxin
`" 0.6 ng/ml
`
`-.
`
`.
`
`__%_B_Qund___
`Control’
`+ Abbott-85499
`93 .55
`93.53
`99.38
`99.37
`99.55
`99.55
`75.47
`75.36
`60.99
`60.69
`33.75
`34.46
`‘ + 50% ethanol
`
`»‘-
`
`% of
`Control
`100
`100
`100
`99.9
`99.5
`102
`
`~
`Summary:
`Dexmedetomidine, at 0.6 ng/ml, did not displace any of the concomitant drugs from the plasma
`protein binding, in vitro. The mean Cmax, in viva, during the use of the MRHID was 2.4 ng/ml,
`exceeding the test dose by 4-fold. This test may not be predictive of clinical effects.
`
`
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.22 -
`We:
`In vitro determination of human red cell binding of Abbott-85499-3H (dexmedetomidine)
`(Protocol—V97-026)
`‘~
`(#246)
`
`mm: Report No. R&D/97/371
`191mm:
`Wimp Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`W3 September 1997
`Methods: Blood was obtained from 2 male and 2 female volunteers who had fasted for at least 8
`hours and had taken no medicine other than aspirin in the last week and no salicylates within the
`last 48 hours. The hemocrit was determined for each subject; M1=41.7%, M2=42.9%,
`F 1=39.2% and F2=40_%. The heparinized samples were spiked with labeled dexmedetomidine,
`0.5 to 5ng base/ml, and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. An aliquot of the samples was centrifuged
`at 4°C and 1 ml of plasma was extracted with acetonitrile and characterized 5e»
`WWW: Medetomidine HCl, with tritium on the bridge methyl
`
`group, was synthesized
`the dexmedetomidine isomer was separated at Abbott
`by chiral chromatography. (Lot #55585-ST-108; 72.6 Ci/mmol, 278.3 mCi/mg) The
`W
`
`96
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Results:
`
`'
`
`_
`
`There was no metabolism of dexmedetomidine or degradation in the whole blood. There were
`minor concentration dependent differences in binding but the binding was low to the RBCs.
`There were no sex differences evident and the fraction bound to the red blood cells over the
`
`entire concentration range, 0.5 - 5 ng base/ml, averaged 0.153, the RBC to plasma concentration
`ratio was 0.325 and the whole blood to plasma ratio was 0.723. Thefollowing table was copied
`from the submission:
`Mean
`Female
`Male
`Parameter
`0.183
`0.186
`O.-180
`{m -.
`0.325
`0.348
`0.302
`Cdpr
`0.723
`0.742
`0.704
`Cbm/Cp
`{m = fraction bound; Cm= concentration in RBC; Cuwfi concentration in.whole blood
`Cp= concentration in plasma
`A -
`
`The binding for dexmedetomidine to human red blood cells was low, only about 18% and this
`represented about 32% of the plasma concentrations.
`
` ####
`
`[431[451
`
`Abbott-85499 Drug Metabolism Report No.27 -
`51ml;
`Conversion of [3H]dexmedetomidine to [H] levomedetomidine in male subjects
`following a 2 jig/kg infusion of [3H]dexmedetomidine'HCl
`
`_
`Study No: Report No. R&D/97/458
`V9] #55. page £|§3z
`WWW: Abbott Laboratories Division 46: Abbott Park, IL
`W August 1997
`
`(#256)
`.
`
`: .
`
`Methods: Plasma samples were obtained from human subjects (from study DEX-96-018), 10
`_
`minutes, 1, 2, and 4, 5 or 6 hours post administration of labeled dexmedetomidine, 2 ug/kg
`infusion. The samples were analyzed by ___.._’———— Some samples were spiked with labeled
`levomedetomidine to.establish the minimum level of detection. The urine of the subjects was
`also analyzed for levomedetomidine was previously found in vitro to be rapidly glucuronidated.
`
`
`
`Wm: Medetomidine HCl, with tritium on the bridge methyl
`group, was synthesized.
`ind the dexmedetomidineisomer was separated at Abbott
`by chiral chromatography. (Lot #55585-ST-37 360 mcCi/ug) Unlabeled dexmedetomidine, Lot
`#295260-O-AX, was added to the labeled dexmedetomidine HCl and levomedetomidine (Batch
`PT0202). The radiochemical purity of ’M
`
`97
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Results:
`
`Chiral conversion of dexmedetomidine to levomedetomidine was not detected in chiral
`
`chromatography of plasma samples from human receiving 2 ug/kg infusions. The limit of
`detection was 0.02 ng/ml. Reevaluation of data from study DEX-96-018 did reveal a possible
`exposure to the glucuron‘idated levo isomer. The possible exposure was slight, less than 0.5% of
`the AUQm for total plasma radioactivity. The possible amount of glucuronidated
`levomedetomidine was less than 1.5% of the dose, in the 0-72 hour urine samples and it was
`present as an impurity of about 0.3% in the labeled dexmedetomidine administered.
`‘
`..
`
`If there is any chiral conversion of dexmedetomidine into the leyo isomer, it is very slight and
`the levo isomer has been shown to be inactive and non-toxic at-any feasable dose (see
`Toxicology, impurities).
`
` W
`
`ADME - Pharmacokinetic Summary
`
`Was:
`The in vitro study ofplasma protein binding of dexmedetomidinc in different species did not find
`any significant sex differences and monkey plasma had the least binding at about 85% with rats
`at 88% [34]. The dexmedetomidine binding was similar in dog, mouse and man, 93%, 95% and
`94%, respectively. Dexmedetomidine was not extensively bound to human red blood cells over
`a range of concentrations. The fraction of dexmedetomidine bound averaged 0.183. The ratio of
`RBC concentration / plasma concentration averaged 0.325 [38]. The binding to alpha,-
`glycoproteins was studied also. The concentration of dexmedetomidine was evaluated between
`0.85 and 85 ng/ml and the concentrations of albumin and a.-acid glycoproteins were varied to
`approximate clinical disease state conditions. The results indicate that dexmedetomidine may
`have slightly higher unbound levels in the disease states which substantially lower serum
`albumin levels [35].
`
`The in vitro effects of other therapeutic agents on the plasma binding of dexmedetomidine was
`examined with fentanyl, theophylline, digoxin and other compounds and found to be minimal
`[36]. In the converse, dexmedetomidine did not affect the plasma protein binding of phenytoin,
`warfarin, theophylline or ibuprofen [37].
`
`98
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Absorption:
`The absorption of dexmedetomidine fi'om subcutaneous injection in the rat was rapid, the t m,
`was 0.6 to 0.7 hours [22], and the t m, in the rat afier im injection was 0.33 hrs[47]. In the dog
`the intramuscular absorption was also rapid, t m = 0.6 hours [23].
`
`L .
`.1
`.
`:
`.
`Tissue distribution in the rat was examined in one study the sponsor considered questionable, due
`to a specific activity too low to reliably measure the parent compound by HPLC [47]. However,
`the exposures of the adrenals, liver and kidneys afieriv administration relative to plasma
`exposures (AUC values compared) was 51x, 34x and 15x, respectively.
`
`Another study was submitted with the IND and previously reviewed (see attached Addendum 1,
`#239). In that‘s'tudy the sc dose of labeled dexmedetomidine (40 ug/kg) accumulated in the
`adrenals 72x plasma concentrations and 36139x in the kidneys. The 20 ug/kg iv study [29] found
`that the labeled dexmedetomidine accumulated in the pigmented eyes of the Long Evans rats, but
`not the eye of the albino Sprague Dawley rats. However, the pigmented skin of the Long Evans
`rats did not accumulate the compounds. The exposure of various tissues to labeled compound
`exceeded the plasma exposure, as determined by AUC ratios. In the males, the exposure ratios
`were 185x, 54x and 11x, for adrenals, liver and kidneys, respectively. The tissue concentrations
`all exceeded the plasma concentrations at least at one time point. The mean peak concentrations
`in the brain were 6x greater than in plasma. The tissue levels of labeled compounds decreased
`significantly and after 72 hours the concentrations were only 0.1% to 5% of the peak levels.
`
`Metabolism;
`Dexmedetomidine isextensively metabolized in rats, dogs and humans as the parent compound
`is present as less than 1% of the administered dose in either feces or urine. The following
`discussion of primary metabolic pathways must be regarded as preliminary as the “other” in the
`metabolic tables represents 55% to 64% of metabolites in rats, 60+% in dogs and 30% of the
`urine metabolites in humans. The metabolism is similar in the different species as the first step
`involves N-methylation, bridge methyl hydroxylation, 3-methyl hydroxylation or N-
`glucuronidation. However, the N-glucuronidation is observed as a primary metabolite only in-
`humans. The 3-methyl hydroxylation is favored in the rats and dogs but is also present in man.
`The glucuronidation of the 3-hydroxyl metabolite is a major pathway in rats and the oxidation of
`3-methyl hydroxyl to the carboxy is a major pathway in rats and dogs, but minor in humans. The
`sulfate of the 3-hydroxy is a major plasma metabolite. in rats and dogs but not in humans. While
`these metabolites have not been shown to be in active 'in viva, they have been found weakly
`active in in vitro studies[3] and they represent 34% ofthe dexmedetomidine excretion[33]. The
`human plasma AUC for dexmedetomidine, 2 ug/kg i.v.,
`is 3.26 and the AUCs' for the N-
`glucuronides are 7.8 and 1.37 [33]. This exposure of humans to the N-glucuronides is not seen in
`animals as the dog and rat do not make these metabolites except possibly in trace amounts. The
`proposed human metabolism is presented as a flow diagram on the following page.
`
`99
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 21-038
`
`Table of the proposed metabolic pathway in humans was copied from the submission
`(Vol43/pg07 l ):
`
`Figure 8. Proposed Dexmedetomidine Metabolic-fathway in
`Humans
`
`
`
`1
`1
`a
`
`<
`”,4
`
`- .,.
`
`com
`
`as
`
`3. “r;
`
`2......
`
`<
`«c’
`
`goon N-Meom
`
`N-Meuui O-Ghumidc '
`
`1 W |
`
`_
`
`I Coup.-
`
`' Os
`
`'w
`
`‘
`<
`.4 l
`as 9.,
`
`«ya-am
`
`mum N-Methyl
`
`
`
`100 ’
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 21-038
`
`The Pk parameters and the metabolites of rats, dogs and humans are presented in the following
`table from the submission (Vol 23/pg 299) :
`2
`
`Table Pk sum 1:
`Summary of [’HJDexmedetomidine Metabolism in Animals and Humans -Plasma Data
`Human
`1381
`821
`1208
`1202
`2.+»
`
`1342mm
`Elamlmaljfl
`
`Cmax (ng Eq/mi) _
`_
`_
`Tmax (hr)
`_
`
`2.48
`2.13
`
`8.98
`‘ - 6.0
`
`m'mm 11.0.3.8
`
`22.11
`
`E
`
`. l.
`l
`Cmax (ng/mi)
`Tmax(hr)
`W
`Msialmlms
`AUC (ng Eq.hr/ml)
`Total 3H
`011‘-
`COOH
`G-OH
`
`S0,0l-l
`
`GS-OH
`M-OH
`G-Dex-l
`G-Dex~2
`
`,
`N-Me.
`G-N-Me-OH
`N-MeCOOH
`
`H-3/D-7@
`chers
`
`Reference
`
`,
`
`2.03
`0.50
`
`5.23.
`
`30.48
`0.46
`1.67
`1.96
`2.28
`
`15.15
`
`101.81
`1.01‘
`5.0
`8.37
`7.20
`
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`
`nd
`nd
`nd
`‘ nd
`nd
`nd
`nd
`
`2.521
`
`32.63
`0.62
`3.04
`3.05
`3.63
`
`nd
`nd

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket