throbber
ET F
`
`LTI
`
`DRE ARH
`
`AEELIQATIQE NUMBER: NDA 20845
`
`W
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`NDA 20-345
`
`-
`
`INO Therapeutics. Inc.
`Attention: Richard N. Williams. PhD.
`54 Old Highway 22
`Clinton. N] 08809
`
`Dear Dr. Williams:
`
`1"
`
`7- Ma Dorm-1°”
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`MAY 28 $99
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`We have received your new drug application (NDA) resubmitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food. Drug,
`Cosmetic Act for the following:
`
`and
`
`Name of Drug Product: lNOmax (nitric oxide)
`
`Therapeutic Clgssification: Priority (P)
`
`Date of Resubmission: May 24. 1999
`
`.1
`
`Date of Receipt; May 26. 1999
`
`Our Reference Number: 20-845
`
`Unless we notify you within 60 days of our receipt date that
`substantive review. this application will be filed under section 505(b) of the Act on July 25
`21CFR 314.]0](a).
`
`US. Postal Service:
`
`Courier/Overnight Mail:
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products. HFD-l 10
`Attention: Division Document Room
`5600 Fishers Lane
`'-
`
`Rockville, Maryland 20857
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division of Candie—Renal Drug Products. HFD-l 10
`Attention: Division Document Room
`145] Rockville Pike
`
`Rockville. Maryland 20852-1420
`
`
`
`

`

`NDA 20-845
`
`Page 2
`
`If you'havc any questions. please contact:
`
`Ms. Zelda McDonald
`Regulatory Health Project Manager
`(301)594-5333
`
`Sincerely yOurs.
`
`';
`
`"B
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chief, Project Management Staff
`Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`3
`cc:
`Archival NDA‘20-345
`HFD-l 101m. Files
`
`__
`
`:_
`
`CE
`DISTRJ
`FD-I IOFZMcDonald
`AS 3
`
`filenarne: 20845ac.doc
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (Ac)
`
`-w
`
` any—"9"“
`
`.‘n.n“if?"""
`
`
`a.park"“’
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-845
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.
`Attention: Ms. Priya Jambhekar
`PO. Box 804
`110 Allen Road
`
`Liberty Corner. NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`Dear Ms. Jambhekar;
`
`Piease refer to your new drug application (NDA) for nitric oxide for inhalation, 400 ppm.
`
`‘
`
`In reviewing your sub'mission of June 16, 1997, our Medical Officer has raised a number of
`questions that require your attention. Our concerns with your submission are detailed as part
`of this correspondence (see enclosure).
`'
`
`Sincerely yours.
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chiet;:Project Management Staff
`Division of Cardio-Ftenal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation |
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure
`
`Dr. Throckmorton‘s 11/24/97 review. pgs 138-248
`
`cc:
`
`Original NDA
`-_
`0
`
`HFD-110lZMcDonaldl12l4/97
`
`GENERAL WERESPONDENCE
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-845
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.-
`Attention: Ms. Priya Jambhekar
`PO. Box 804
`110 Allen Road
`
`Liberty Corner. NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`Dear Ms. Jambhekar:
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) tor nitric oxide.
`
`Sincerely yours;
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chief;:-Project Management Staff
`Division of Cardio-Henal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation l
`Center tor Drug EValuation and Research
`
`.
`
`-.
`_
`
`Enclosure
`
`Dr. Oza's review dated October 10, '1997
`
`CC:
`
`-
`
`Original NDA
`
`HFD.—.J_10-
`(
`/i-TEo-110/2Mco_gnaIu/10/21/e7
`sbllO/27197
`
`GENERAL OORRESPONDBKJE
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`’
`—— .
`/@ DEPARTMENT or HEALTH aHUMAN SERVICES
`
`qu ’20-845
`
`dhmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.
`Attention: Ms. Priya Jambhekar
`P.O. Box 804
`110 Allen Road
`Liberty Corner, NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`Dear Ms. Jambhekan
`
`' -
`
`2. Marmara
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20357
`
`55p 29 l997
`
`We acknowledge the receipt of your September 16. 1997 communication requesting withdrawal
`of your pending new drug application (NDA) for lNOmax (nitric Oxide) for inhalation.
`in compliance with your request and as provided under 21 CFR 314.65, the application is
`withdrawn as of the date of our receipt of your request for withdrawal, September 17, 1997.
`This withdrawal does not prejudice any future resubmission. You may request that the
`information contained in the withdrawn application be considered in conjunction with any
`resubmission.
`
`-.
`
`1
`
`-
`
`Under section 736(a)(1)(A)(iij(ll) of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 (PDUFA),
`the remaining 50% of the user fee is due upon withdrawal after filing of a pending application.
`if you decide to resubmit your application at a future time. under section 736(a)(1)(C) of the
`PDUFA, the submissionwill not be subject to a fee?
`
`If you have any questions, please contact:
`
`Ms. Zelda McDonald
`Regulatory Health Project Manager
`(301)
`594-5333
`
`Sincerely yours.
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chief. Project Management Staff
`Division of Cardin-Renal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`NDA 20-845
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.-
`Attention: Ms. Priya-Jambhekar
`P.O. Box 804
`
`110 Allen Road
`
`.
`
`Liberty Corner, NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`Dear Ms. Jarnbhekar:
`
`.
`
`Please refer to your new drug application (NDA) for nitric oxide for inhalation, 400 ppm.
`
`in reviewing your suthission of June 16, 1997, our Medical Officer has raised a number of
`questions that require your attention. Our concerns with your submission are detailed as part
`of this correspondence (see enclosure).
`
`-
`
`I
`
`Sincerely yours.
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`ChiefgiProject Management Staff
`Division of Cardio~Renal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation l
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`Enclosure
`
`L. Miriam Pina. M.D.'s 8/25/97 review
`
`CC:
`
`Original NDA
`'
`,
`HFD-
`FD-110/ZMcDonald/9f9/97
`sb/
`\— .
`
`GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
`
`_
`
`
`
`

`

`50
`
`V
`
`5' -/¢ DEPARTMENT or HEALTH e. HUMAN SERVICES
`
`:1.
`
`RDA 20-345
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.
`Attention: Ms. Priya Jambhekar
`'
`P.0. Box 804
`110 Allen Road
`Liberty Corner, NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`Dear Ms. Jambhekar:
`
`"
`
`Z— wamdw
`
`Pub“c Health Service
`
`Food and Drug Administration'
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`JUN 19 1997
`
`We have received your new drug application (NDA) submitted under section 505(b) of the
`Federal Food, Drug. and Cosmetic Act for the following:
`-
`Name oi Drug Product:
`l-NO (nitric oxide)
`
`Therapeutic Classification: P
`
`Date of Application: June 16. 1997
`
`.2
`
`Date of Receipt: June 16. 1997
`
`Our Reference Number: NDA 20-845
`
`ief report on the status of the review
`'
`ultimate approvability. Please request the meeting at least 15 da '
`you may choose to receive such a report by telephone. Should you wish a conference. a telephone
`report, or if_ you have any questions concerning this NDA. please 0ontact:
`
`Ms. Zelda McDonald
`Regulatory Health Project Manager
`(301)
`594-5333
`
`l
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Page 2 - NDA 20-845
`
`Please cite the NDA number listed above at the top of the first page of any' communications
`concerning this application.
`
`Sincerely yours,
`
`a
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chief. Project Management Staff
`Division of Cardio‘Ren‘al Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation 1
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`a:
`
`1‘.
`
`Orig. NDA
`HFD-1 10 ;.
`DISTRICT OFFlCE
`FD-1 10/ZMcDonal
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - AC
`
`
`
`n..."-
`
`£1.1YY'
`‘.
`6"-
`.i;
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`L. --..
`
`nglEDLH .___..___,—_—
`
`3";me soc anew
`
`June 10, 1997
`
`
`
`-.—_______.
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Produe
`PO Box 804/110 Allen Road
`Liberty Corner NJ 07938 0804
`see 542 9200
`
`Is Division inc
`
`Food and Drug Adnfirfisu'afion
`1451 RoclwillePike
`5th Floor
`Rockville MD 20852
`
`I
`
`--
`
`_
`
`I
`
`.
`
`_
`
`- MAX...
`a.
`.
`
`Attention:
`
`Raymond Lipicky, MD
`Director, Division ofGordie-Renal Drug Products
`
`u;
`
`. —NDA 20-345, Nitric Oxide for Inhalation, 400 ppm
`Submission of a press release to announce N'DA submission
`
`Dear Dr. Lipicky,
`
`Reference is made to a teleconference ofJune 4, 1997 between Ms Zelda McDonald ofthe
`Agency and Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc, (Ohmeda PPD). As discussed
`during the teleconference, Ohmeda PPD plans to submit the NDA on June 16, 1997 and
`would like to announce filing ofthis NDA immediately aflerwards. A copy ofthe
`proposed press release is attached for your review.
`
`release.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Priya Jambhekar
`Director, Regulatory Afiairs
`
`I.
`
`ene: - Proposed Press Release
`
`
`
`cc:
`
`Zelda McDonald
`Project Manager
`
`

`

`'
`
`'umuy
`at"
`"
`
`V.
`
`g' / DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
`a. C
`'
`
`20’!
`
`Public Health Service
`
`m
`
`a
`
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20857
`
`IND- r
`
`_J .
`
`.
`
`OCT 30 4995
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division. inc.
`Attention: Mr. Christopher J. Schaber
`110 Allen Road
`
`Liberty Corner, NJ
`
`07938-0804
`
`‘
`
`Dear Mr. Schaber:
`
`Please refer to your investigational new drug applications (INDS) submitted under section
`505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug. and Cosmetic Act for nitric oxide.
`'
`
`'We also reter to the Pre-NDA meeting held on September 27. 1998. between representatives of
`your firm and this Agency. The following represents our summary of the meeting.
`'
`
`J
`
`Background:
`Ohmeda has submitted INDs tor the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the treatment of
`persistent pulmonary hypertension in the neonate (PPHN) and for Acute
`Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) under INDs
`respectively. At the same time Ohmeda wasoonducting their N01 and N02
`studies, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
`was conducting the neonatal inhaled Nitric Oxide Study (NlNOS). The NlNOS was a
`randomized clinical trial using inhaled NO for term and near-term infants with
`hypoxic respiratory failure. The trial was stopped on May 2. 1995 on the
`recommendation of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee since the Committee had
`concluded that the study met the primary outcome without evidence of toxicity.
`Ohmeda subsequently stopped their studies on June 25. 1996 because they found
`they were unable to enroll patients with the NICHD study results known.
`Dr. Wright has agreed that the results of the NINOS may be referred to by FDA in
`support of the Ohmeda application for nitric oxide in PPHN. The purpose of this
`meeting was to discuss the preparation of an NDA for the use of nitric oxide in the
`treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in the neonate.
`
`Discussion Pointleecisions/Agreements Reached:
`
`1 .
`
`Does the content of the clinical section. as outlined below. remain
`acceptable to the Agency in support of the neonatal NDA?
`
`Inhaled NO 01 and 02 Studies-
`NlNOS -
`Wessel Study-
`‘
`Roberts Study-
`Inhaled NO 04 and 05 Studies-
`Inhaled NO Literature Review-
`
`'
`
`Full Clinical Report
`Manuscript (as recommended by FDA)
`ManuscriptlAbbreviated Clinical Report
`Manuscript/Abbreviated Clinical Report
`Full Clinical Report
`Reports/Summaries on 1) other neonatal studies
`and 2) non-neonatal studies
`
`I
`
`.-
`
`l
`‘
`
`
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`M
`
`.
`
`(Studies 04 and 05
`The above outline is acceptable to the Agency.
`are not needed for this NDA. see item #4 below.)
`
`With regard to the NINOS study. the Division requested that the tollowing .
`be submitted to the NINOS IND:
`
`.
`.
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`Full data tape with SAS variables.
`_
`Annotated case report tonne.
`The manuscript that was submitted to the New England Journal of
`Medicine for publication.
`The original protocol and dated set of amendments.
`Accounting of all patients, i.e., all numbers should add up.
`
`The Division requested that Ohmeda‘s NDA contain the following with
`regard to the NO 01 and 02 studies:
`
`.
`.
`-
`
`-
`-
`
`Full data tape with SAS variables.
`Annotated-case report forms.
`Clinical report should consist of the original protocol. dated set of
`amendments and an analysis of the results.
`Accounting of all patients, i.e., all numbers should add up.
`Tabular listing need not be included.
`
`is it necessary tor Ohmeda to have three month stability data on nitric
`oxide-in their to-be-marketed cylinders at the time the NDA is
`submitted?
`
`-
`
`I The Division agreed it would not be necessary.
`
`A strategy for defending the data from NiNOS before an Advisory
`Committee since Ohmeda will have limited access to the predefined
`summary tables. Ohmeda may be unable to answer questions concerning
`"interesting" subgroups ortrends that arise irom close scrutiny of the
`data by FDA.
`
`-
`
`'
`
`Dr. Wright agreed that one of the principal investigators from
`NINQS would present NiNOS before the Advisory Committee.
`
`'The Division believed that there was a high-probability the
`application would be taken before the Advisory Committee.
`
`The possibility 'of providing the'interim study'report for Ohmeda's
`completed phase It ARDS trials (protocols O4 and 05) in the neonatal
`NBA.
`in lieu of a full clinical report (containing safety data only).
`
`-
`
`.
`
`The Division concluded that the ARDS protocols 04 and 05 would
`h_o_t be needed for the PPHN NDA, therefore. the interim report
`would not be needed.
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
`The content and preparation of the integrated summaries of efficacy and
`safety.
`
`-
`
`0
`
`The Division believed that an integrated summary of effigagy
`would not be needed. but some sort- of integrated summary of safety
`wggld be needed.
`
`The firm asked it they could meet with the Division again to
`discuss a strategy for writing an integrated summary of safety.
`and the Division agreed.
`
`The practical issues in attempting to satisfy the August 23, 1996 FDA
`letter wherein the Agency strongly suggested that every effort be made to
`achieve a 0% loss-to~follow-‘up rate for protocols 01 and 02 (N=153).
`
`-
`
`' The Division encouraged the firm to be aggressive in locating all
`patients treated under studies 01 and 02 and obtaining follow-up
`data on them. The Division believed the firm would not have to
`have all the long term outcomes at the time the NDA is submitted
`if
`but a decision would not be made until those data are submitted.
`the application is a “P.“ the firm should be diligent in submitting
`the follow-up data since there'will be only a six month window to
`action.
`If the data are not submitted on time, it is possible the
`Agency would issue a not approvable letter. Although it is not the
`Division's intention to take an action until the follow-up data are
`reviewed,
`if the data are strikingly convincing.
`it is possible the
`application could be approved without long-term data.
`
`The NIH will be issuing a "Clinical Alert" regarding the results of NINOS.
`Does the Division wish to be involved in writing the clinical alert?
`Because of the Clinical Alert, Ohmeda expects that there will be many
`more new investigators. especially from primary care hospitals.
`requesting use of NO who may not be as qualified as earlier investigators
`from tertiary care hospitals. How will the Agency handle such
`investigators?
`
`-
`
`0
`
`The Division would like to be involved in the writing of the
`clinical alert.
`
`The new investigators can obtain their own IND or they can become
`investigators under either Ohmeda's lND or the NINOS lND. The
`Division expressed concern that the Clinical Alert will trigger
`many new lND requests from clinicians Who may be
`underinformed about necessary procedures and precautions for
`
`

`

`Page 4-
`
`use of nitric oxide. Meeting participants agreed that it may be
`useful for NIH to refer.
`in the Clinical Alert. to some sort of
`instruction sheet to- be devised and provided to would-be IND
`holders.
`
`If you have any questions concerning these INDs. please contact:
`
`Ms. Zelda McDonald,
`Regulatory Health Project Manager
`(301)
`594.5333
`
`Sincerely, yours.
`
`Natalia A. Morgenstern
`Chief. Project Management Staff
`Division ot Cardio-Flenal Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation I
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`cc:
`
`Original END ’
`
`. F_Q;t_10/ZMcDonald/10/24196
`sb/10f2—9
`
`GENERAL CORRESPONDBJCE
`
`

`

`"H4113!”
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`~
`
`I
`
`H
`
`"ammwliflll’mductsDivision
`
`Ohmeda Inc
`110 Allen Road PO Box 804
`Liberty Corner NJ 07938 0804
`908 647 9200
`
`October 5. 1994
`
`- Food and Drug Administration.
`HFD-110, Room 168-45
`’
`5600 Fishers Lane
`Rockviile
`MD 20857
`
`Attention: Raymond Lipicky, MD
`Director, Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products
`

`
`.re:
`
`1ND
`
`inhaled Nitric Oxide (IND)-
`Serial #032 - General Correspondence
`
`Dear Dr Lipicky:
`
`“" _.-.
`
`We thank you for your time in meeting with us. A
`the following background information is attached :
`'
`' Proposed Meeting Agenda/Attendees
`0
`Drug Substance Profile (Attachment I)
`0
`
`'
`
`‘5':
`
`.15:
`as
`I‘.
`iii.
`
`C
`,
`-
`in-
`“I, I? ": A.
`.
`.. >32:
`
`~
`
`Drug Product Profile {Attachment ll)
`
`Drug Substance/Product Analytical Controls (Attachméfifiii)
`
`Drug SLibstance/Product Stability (Attachment IV)
`
`Environmental Assessment {Attachment V)
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`Formerly Anaouesl inc
`
`
`

`

`Raymond Lipicky, MD
`" October 5, 1994
`Page 2
`
`If you have Ham/questions prior to the meeting. please contact me at
`(908) 604-7704 or Steven Pikulin at (908) 604-7703.
`
`SincerelyYours,
`
`"
`
`/m 2.91%; Fae
`
`Robert I. Outwater
`Senior DirectorpyVorldwide Regulatory Affairs
`
`
`
`Desk Capies:
`
`Dr Walters _
`Dr Cunningham
`
`enc: Form FDA 1571
`
`SP:ab
`
`

`

`
`
`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`INVESTIGA'IIOIIAL NEW onus APPLICATION (IN I
`- ., mnrzr. cone or renew REGULATIONS (cm em :12)
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`IN 0'
`
`
`FormW: OMB No. 0.9 I'D-OOH.
`
`Exam Iron De Ie : November 30. I995.
`
`
`See OMB Sn Iemen: on serene.
`
`
`
`
`
`NOTE: No drug may be ”upped or dlmul
`
`Invemgmon begun mm! on IND Ior that
`
`mnrugmon II In eflen (21 CPR 31210)
`'A‘
`
`
`
`2 DATE OF SUBMISSION
`
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc
`
`
`19%
`October 5
`
`
`3. ADDRESS (Number, Street, Cnmee endZIp Code)
`I TELE'HONE NUMBER
`
`
`(Mode Aru Code}
`110 Allen-Road
`
`
`Liberty Corner
`_
`NJ 07938 0804‘
`
`
`
`908/604-7705
`
`
`
`
`5. NAMEIS) OF DRUG (Include eIIeuI'IabIe names: rude. Generic. Chemical; Code)
`
`. IND NUMBER I previously “up"; .
`Nitric oxide
`
`
`
` 7. INDICATIONISJICo-Ieredby this warnInI‘On) _
`
`
`Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension in the Newborn (PPHN) and Acute Respiratory
`
`Distress Syndrorne (ARDS)
`
`
`
`9 LIST NUMSERS OF ALL INVES‘TTOAIIONAL NEW onus APPLICATIONS {2: CM Pan .1 I2). NEW DRUG DR AN‘IIIIOTIC APPLICATIONS
`{2! CHI Pen 3“). DRUG MAST“. FILES {2! CFR J" 42w. {IND PRODUCT LICENSE APPLICATIONS (2’ CFR hr! GOIJ flE FERRED 70 IN THIS
`APPLICATION.
`-
`.
`
`
`
`5. PHASE moscLummmvrsnomou IDBECONDUCTED:DPHASE1 menus:
`
`amuse: Domes
`
`
`
` (Specify)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Io. IND submissrons shouldbe consecutively numbered. The initial IND shouIdbe numbered
`
`SERIAL NUMBER:
`'Sen'al Numb-er: 000. " The next submimon (e.g.. amendment. report. or correspondence)
`
`
`
`97on be numbered 'Sen'al Number: 00!. ' SubsequenIsubI-nissions should be numbered
`
`0 3 2
`consecutively In the order in which they are summed." -’~
`‘
`
`
`
`
`11. THIS SUBMISSION CONTAINS 'IHI: FOLLOWING: (Check eIItheuppM
`
`D INITIAL INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUG APPLICATION (IND)
`
`- D RESPONSE To CLINICAL HOLD
`
`PROTOCOL AMENDME NTIS):
`a NEW PROTOCOL
`CI CHANGE IN PROTOCOL
`0 NEWIIIVESTIGATOR
`
`INFORMATION AME NDMENTISI:
`u CHEMISTRYMICROIIOLOGT
`L1 PHARMACOLOGTNOXICOLOGY
`D CLINICAL ‘
`
`.
`
`'
`
`IND SAFETY REPORTISI:
`. D mnmwmnmuwn
`Cl Fouow.up TD ‘ WRITTEN upon
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
` E] RESPONSE YD FDA REQUEST FOR INFORMA'I’ION
`
`D REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT OF IND YHAT IS WI'THDIIAWN.
`
`INAUIVATED. TERMINATED OF DISCONTINUED
`
`
`DANNUAL RE PORT
`
`O OTHER
`
`a GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
`
`may} '
`
`
`
`
`”mm: mum-Ion
`
`III-USER
`
` .I'm‘smurm suirufin'
`
`
`
` IND NUMSERASSIGNED:
`
` owIsION ASSIGNMENT:
`
`513'.- --'I_ I. ,
`
`
`
`FAGIIOF}
`
`
`
`fDRMFDA IS‘HIIZI‘IH
`‘, £559? ‘31" Ispasngn.
`\é-V‘J 3233;: y"
`«11.-
`
`
`
`

`

`ow
`
`
`I! THEIOCGRDU‘P
`
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc
`PO Box 804 I110 Allen Road
`Liberty Carner NJ 07938 0804
`900 647 9200
`
`Ms. Priya Jambhekar
`Director. Regulatory Affairs
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.
`1 10 Allen Road
`Liberty Corner. New Jersey 07938-0004
`
`'
`
`June 10. 1997
`
`‘
`
`Re:
`
`Patent Certification - l-l\i0m (Nitric Oxide)
`Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division inc.
`Our Ref. PA#V10
`‘
`'
`
`Dear Ms. Jambhekar:
`
`
`
`is the exclusive
`This is to certify that Ohmeda Pharmaceutical Products Division Inc.
`licensee for the rights to the administration of Nitric Oxide by inhalation for the
`prevention and treatment of reversible pulmonary vasoconstriction. These rights.
`were acquired from the General Hospital Corporation of Boston, Massachusetts under
`the following U.S. Patent:
`
`LLS, Patent No. 5.585.322 which-claims prevention or treatment of reversible
`pulmonary vasoconstriction by the inhalation of nitric oxide with an oxygen-
`containing gas. This patent expires January 23, 2013.
`'
`
`If you require additional information with regard to the U.S. patent discussed herein,
`please so advise me.
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`@7
`
`R. Hain Swope
`Patent Counsel
`
`
`
`
`
`0079 0|,
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket