throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Aggroval Package for:
`
`APPLICA TION. NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8007
`
`Trade Name:
`
`Brevibloc '
`
`Generic Name: Esmolol HCl Injection
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Dupont Critical Care Inc.
`
`Approval Date: May 11, 1989
`
`"Indications:
`
`Short—Term control of heart rate in patients
`with abnormally fast heart rhythms such as .
`artrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or sinus
`'
`
`tachycardia.
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND I
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER: _
`19-386/8007
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`
`
`
`Approval Letter
`
`A rovable Letter
`
`
`|=Rei7ieWs / Information Included in this NDA Review. i
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`Labeling
`Medical Review(s)
`Chemistry Review(s)
`PharmacOlogy Review(s)
`Statistical Review(s)
`Microbiolo -y Review(s)
`Clinical Pharmacology/ Biopharmaceutics Review(s)
`Administrative/Correspondence Document(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I -
`— ‘
`_
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`,
`
`. APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`18-998/8038'
`
`APPROVAL LETTER
`
`

`

`99111130
`
`9911 19999191997
`
`13999119 (tr-Men 699-91. Ine.
`1119991199;
`119, 919-999 L. Riahter
`1681!- 111999999 Read
`9199119999111;
`61-3685
`
`11999 119-. 111999-9192
`
`r11 6. 1989
`1159. 991499919999 the r299191 an Aprfi 1.1, 1989 91‘ yam-1.
`, 9999199991991 1199: drug 9991199191911 59991129911 under 9991. on 5115 (91(1) of 91m
`119418191 9999-, 511199999 699919919 Act far 3199919199 199919191 HE‘1I) 1939915199.
`1’11‘9. 99991911199191 11991199911911 921991.699 fer the afidition of the 1' arm-fie 911
`1199999 91999999 99 9911 as remand shew Tm;- 119919 199.991.9999 Pia-99999
`19891991
`99 --na9e that this 69999:: strength was 19619199. 19 the 91-19199!
`11911
`1191 at 999 191199: 99 9519999111,.9919 did 999 wish to mark-9t 19.
`
`-
`
`119 919999193:an 1919 119-1199 af 1:11-19 98991-891911991 99911989199 «:9 ft is
`: 1:891r
`=r 19-11-999 91’ 119991.19” 31.1985 1199:1199 1119 9911919199: 99189199 ‘99»
`
`'9 119999111 91? 11111-9 99911991199.
`-
`
`99 mm 999 that 999 19991: 999919 91th the regain-meat: for an 8.9989994 RM
`181. 1919911 9999:: 91 9119 {911199 9919 31119-1.
`
`-
`
`91:99-19 m 1:38! am: 999911999. phase cement:
`
`99; 29149 919mm 1
`99999991: Sax-fut. 9111.999
`191-9131199111 191) «Mia-u
`
`' 691911191 NBA
`
`.
`
`Shaun 39m .(Jute/22M
`
`
`1199919199 11911-919119. H.111
`[11311361112
`9 9m
`:1???“ e e m :99 1 9
`999—199
`919199 91‘ 39995191989199 1
`(With ”baring”
`11:53:13:
`59111” 1‘11" 31:19 9991999189 9911 99:99:99
`HEB-1199111999991 (114,191 199 34/24/89
`9114iz§§9€519£9fi919199x22469 3m 519151
`
`mmanstem/Alafifas4129199
` /WL4/f9
`
`.
`
`van-999998999999
`
`99999191..
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8007
`
`LABELING
`
`

`

`
`
`' NoA 19-386
`
`BREVIBLOC’ Inqscrron
`
`(ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE)
`
`INSERT - A43113
`
`0
`
`'BR‘EVV'I‘I LDC” INJECTION
`(esmolol hydrochloride)
`E}
`II) It. Am til —¥::gt?l 2.5 I: Hill run IltItECT INHIIVEIIJIIS
`E
`I
`I’ll ITS ill USIIJII- SE MSAEE AND ADMINISI'IIM'IIIII SECTION].
`'
`lflml Single lieu VIII — lilo trip
`.
`DESCRIPTION
`BHEVIBLOC' (esmolol MCI) is a beta -seleclive (cardioselective) adrenergle receptor blocking agent with a very
`short duration at action (elimination hall-lite is approximately 9 minutes). Esmolol MCI is:
`'
`ture:
`til-Methyl p-lZ-hydroxy-fl-[isopropylamlncl propoxyl hydrodnnamate hydrochloride and has the lollowing struc-
`
`'tlifl
`'
`
`'
`
`|989
`:
`MAY 5
`CH,0.CCH,CH,-©—OCH2CHOHCHZNHCH(CH,),.HC|
`
`Esmolol Hct has the empirical lormlua c..H,.N0.cr and a molecular weight at 331.8. It has one asymmetric center
`and exists as an enantlomeric pair.
`-
`-
`Esmolol Hcl is a white to oil-white crystalline powder. It is a relativdy hydrophlllc compound whhh is very soluble
`propra
`cl.
`In watexnd lreely soluble in alcohol. its partition coelticlent (octanollwaterl at pH 7.0 is 0.42 compared to 17.0 let
`BREVIBLOC' (eemolol HCI) INJECTION Is a clear. colorless to light yellow. sterile. nonpyrogenlc solution tor intrave-
`nous lgtusioq‘ alter diiu ion
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W1} -
`offs
`-
`w
`.
`talnf I I 'rng ismolol HCI In 25% Propylene Glycol..USP, 2596 Alcohol. USP and
`r tor lnlection. USP; buttered with 17.0 mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.00715 ml. Glacial Acetic Acid. USP.
`Wat
`Sodium hydroxide and/orhydroehlorlc acid added. as necessary. to adjust pH to 3.5-5.5.
`100 mg, 10 mL Single Dose Wal -— Each mL contains 10 mg esmolol Itcl and Water lor lngeetion. USP; buttered
`with 2.8 mg Sodium Acetate, USP. and 0.545 mg Glacial Acetic Acid. USP. Sodium hydroxi e and/or hydrochloric
`acid added. as necessary. to adjust pH to 4.5-5.5.
`.
`_
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`BREVIELOC' (motel MCI) is a heta,—selective Imrdioselective) adrenergic remptor blocking agent with rapid
`onset. a very short duration'ol action. and no significant intrinsic sympathornlmetlcor membranestabilizing actlovgz
`at therapeutic dosages lts elimination hall-tile alter Intravenous intuslon is approximately 9 minutes. BHEVIBL
`inhibits the betaI receptors located chielly in cardiac muscle. but this preterentlal ettect Is not absolute and at
`higher doses It begins to Inhibit beta, receptors located chietty In the bronchial and vascularmusculature
`Phlnirecelrlnellcl and Heblnllrn
`.
`BHEVIBLOCO (esmolol MCI) is rapidly metabolized by hydrolysis otthe ester linkage. chlelly by the esterases in the
`growl of red blood cells and not by plasma cholinesterases or red cell membrane acetyleholinesterase Total body
`earance in man 'was found to be about 20 nglhr. whidr ls-greater than ardiac output; thus the metabolisn ol
`BREVIBLOC' is not limited by the rate at blood flow to metabolizing tissues such as the liver or altected by hepatic
`or'renal blood liow. BREVIBLOC° has a rapid distribution haiHiIe 01 about 2 minutes and an elimination hall-llte at
`about 9 minutes.
`
`Using an appropriate loading dose steady-state blood levels ol BHEVIBLOC' lor dosages lrom 50-300 mcglkglmin
`are obt'aln within five minutes. lSteady-state is reached In.‘abou130 minutes without the loading dose.) Study-
`state blood levels at BREVIBLOCO increase linearly over this dosage range and elimination kinetics are dose-
`lndependent over this” range. Steady-state blood levels are maintained during lnlusion but decrease rapidly alter
`termination ol the Inlusion. Because at its short hall-lite. blood levels at BHEVIBLOC' can be rapidly altered by In-
`creasing or decreasing the inlusion rate and rapidly eliminated by discontinuing the inlusion.
`Consistent with the high rate at blood:based metabolism of BREVIBLOC', less than 2% ol the drug is excreted un-
`changed in the urine. Within 24 hours or the end at inlusion. approximately 73-08% at the dosage has been 'accwnt-
`ed tor in the urine as the acid metabolite of BREVIBLOCG.
`Metabolism ol BHEVIBLOC' results in the lormation ol the corresponding tree acid and methanol. The acid metabo-
`lite has been shown in animals to have about tlISOOIh the activityot esmolol and in normal volunteers its blood
`levels do not correspond to the level at beta-blockade. The acid metabolite has an elimination hall-lite at about 17
`hours and Is excreted in the urine with a clearance approximately equivalent to the glorneruiar tiltration rate. Excre-
`tion at the acid metabolite is significantly decreased in patients withvrerial disease. with the elimination halt-tile in-
`creased to about ten-101d that ol normals. and plasma levels considerably elevated.
`Methanol blood levels, monitored in sublects receiving BREVIBtOC' (or up to 6 hours at 300 moglkglmin and 24
`hours at 150 mcgltrglmin, approximated endogenous levels and were less than 2% at levels usually associated with
`methanoltoxiclty.
`'
`_ boun .
`.
`-
`BRElgBLOCO has been shown to be 55% bound to human plasma protein. white the acid metabolite is only 10%
`
`

`

`.
`0N3! NJ
`babel tug:
`‘Rc'dzéflflijl‘lqg‘
`um No :fllgé...
`
`c, M
`
`
`
`
`.
`
`un A
`
`1 n _. 10 r:
`
`rbamacodyumics
`Clinical(pharmacology studies in normal volunteers have confirmed the beta blocking activity at BREVtBLOC° (es-
`molol H ll. showing reduction in heart rate at rest and during exercise. and attenuation ol isoproterenot-induced in-
`creases in heart rate. Blood levels of BREVIBLOC' have been shown to correlate with extent of beta blockade. Alter
`termination ol inlusion. substantial recovery lrom beta blockade is observed in 10~20 minutes.
`in human electrophysioiogy studies. BHEVIBLOCO produced ellects typical of a beta blocker: a decrease in the
`heart rate. rncreasetn srnus cycle length. prolongation ol the sinus node recovery time, prolongation ol the AH inter-
`val during normal srnus rhythm and during atrial pacing, and an increase in antegrade Wenckebach cycle length.
`in patients undergoing radionuclide angiography, BBEVIBLOC’. at dosages oi 200 mcglkg/min. produced reduc-
`tions in heart rate. systolic blood pressure. rate pressure product. tell and right ventricular ejection traction and ar-
`diac index at rest. which were similar in magnitude to those produced by intravenous pmpranolol (4 mg). During ex-
`ercise. BHEVIBLOC" produced reductions in heart rate. rate pressure product and cardiac index which were also
`similar to those produced by propranoiol. but produced a signlticantty larger tall in systolic blood pressure In pa-
`tients undergoing cardiac catheterizatiott. the maximum therapeutic dose at 300 mcg/kglmin ol BBEVIBLOC° pro—
`duced similar ellects. and. in addition. there were small. clinically insignilicaht. increases in the toll ventricularend
`diastolic pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. At thirty minutes alter the discontinuation ul
`BHEVIBLOC‘ inlusion. all at the hemodynamic parameters had returned to pretreatment levels.
`The relative cardioselectivity ot BHEVIBLDC‘ was demonstrated in 10 mildly asthmatic patients. tnlusions ol
`BREVIBLOCO (100, 200 and 300 mcglkglmin) produced no Signilicant increases in specilic airway resistance com-
`pared to placebo At 300 mcglkglmin. BREVIBLOC' produced slightly enhanced bronchomotor sensitivity to dry air
`stimulus. These ellects were not clinically signllicant. and tiiiEVtBLOC‘1 was well tolerated by all patients. Six oi
`the patients also received intravenous propranoiol. and at a dosage ol 1 mg. two experienced significant. symp-
`tomatic bronchospasm requiring bronchodiialor treatment. One other propranoiol-treated patient also experienced
`dry air-induced bronchospasm. No adverse pulmonary ellects were observed in patients with COPD who received
`therapeutic dosages ol BHEVIBLOC" Ior treatment at supraventricular tachycardia (St palientsi or in perioperative
`settings (32 patients).
`Saprmrttricllar tachycardia
`In 'two multi'center. randorhiled. double-blind. controlled comparisons ol BREVIBLOC‘ (esmolol HCI) with placebo
`and propranoiol. maintenance doses at 50 to 300 mcglkglmin oi BREVIBLUC' were lound to be more ellective than.
`placebo and 'about as ellectlve as propranoiol. 3-6 mg given by bolus iniections. in the treatment oi supraventricuiar
`tachycardia. principally atrial tibriitation and atrial llutter. the majority at these patients developed their arrhyth-
`mias postoperativeiy. About 60-70% at the patients treated with BREVIELOC" had a desired therapeutic ellect
`(either a 20% reduction in heart rate. a decrease to heart rate to less than 100 bpm. or. rarely. conversion to NSR)
`and about 95% pl those who responded did so at a dosage of 200 mcglkglmin or less. The average ellective dosage
`ol HHEVIBLOC' was approximately 100-115 mcglkg/min in the' two studies. Other multicenter baseline-controlled
`studies gave essentially similar results. in the comparison with propranoiol. about 50% ot patients in both the
`BREVIBLOC' and propranoioi groups were‘on concomitant digoxin Response rates were slightly higher with both
`beta-blockers in the digoxin-lrealed patients.
`in all studies significant decreases at blood pressure occurred in 20-50% at patients. identitied either as adverse
`reaction reports by investigators. or by observation ol 5 slotic pressure less than 90 mmttg or diastolic pressure
`loss than 50 mmHg. The hypotension was symptomatic gnainly diaphoresis or dizziness) in about 12% oi patients.
`and therapy was discontinued in about 11% at patients. about hall at whom we‘resymptomatic. in comparison to
`p
`ranolol. hypotension was about three times as lrequeni with BHEVtBLCtCO, 53% vs.,t 7%. The hypotension was
`rap dly reversible with decreased inlusion rate or alter discontinuation ol therapy with BHEVIBLOCO. For both
`BREVIBLOCO and propranoiol. hypotension was reported less Irequentiy in patients receiving concomitant digoxin.
`INIIIEATIUNS ANU USAGE
`.
`’
`~
`II rarentrlcular Tachycardia
`B EVIBLDB' (esmolol HCI) is initiated lot the rapid control at ventricular rate in patients with atrial libriilation or
`atrial flutter in perioperative, postoperative. or other emergent circumstances where short term control ol ventricular
`rate with a short-acting agent is desirable. BREVIBLOC' is also indicated in noncompensatory sinus tachycardia
`where. in the physician's iudgement. the rapid heart rate requires specific intervention. BREVIBLOC" is not intended
`Ior use In dtronlc settings where transler to another agent is anticipated.
`-
`CONTIIAINIIIEATIUNS
`_
`.
`BHEVtBLOC' (esmolol HCI) is contraindicated rn patients with srnus bradycardia. heart block greater than lirst
`degree, urologenic shock orovert bean lailure (see Warnings).
`WARNINGS
`It almiu: In clinical trials 20-5096 oi patients treated with BHEVIBLOC' (asmdlol HCI) have experienced hypoten-
`s on. generally delined as systolic pressure loss than 90 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure less than 50 mmllg. About
`12% ol the patients have been symptomatic (mainly diaphoresls or dizziness). Hypertension-can occur at any dose
`but is dose-related so that doses beyond 200 meg/kglmln are not recommended. Patients should be closely moni-
`tored, especially il pretreatment blood pressure is low. Decrease oi dose or termination oi Inlusion reverses hypoten-
`sion. usually within 30 minutes.
`Cardiac Faltara: Sympathetic stimulation is necessary in supporting circulatory lunction in congestive heart Iailurc.
`and beta blockade notes the potential hazard ol lurther depressing myocardial contractility and precipitating more
`severe lailure. Continued depression at the myomrdium. with beta blocking agents were period oi time can. in
`some cases. lead to cardiac lallure. At the lirst sign or symptom cl impending cardiac lallure. the dosage should be
`reduced or BHEVIBLOC° should be withdrawn. Although this dosage adiustment or withdrawal may be sulliclant
`age.
`.
`because at the short elimination hall-tile ol BREVIBLOC'. specitic treatment may also be considered. (See Overdos-
`Iruclarpaaitc lilaum: Mitilit: with lluticllttsrtsitc ntsuse: :llltitto. ttt
`iEtlEltAL ltlti lEcElllE IE"
`aLoctreas. Because of its relative beta. selectivity and titratabiiity, BREVIBLOC" may be used with caution in pa-
`tients with bronchospastic diseases However. since beta. selectivity is not absolute. BREVtBLOC' should be care-
`luily titrated to obtain the lowest possible ellective dose. In the event at bronchospasm. the inlusion slrouid be tor-
`minated Immediately: a beta, stimulating agent may be administered ll conditions warrant but should be used with
`particular caution as patients already have rapid ventricular rate:

`l
`titrlalu Naililu all Malina-la: BHEVIBLOC' should be used with caution-in diabetic patients requiring a beta
`blocking agent. Beta b
`ers may mask tachycardia occurring with hypoglycemia. but other manilestations such
`as dizziness and sweating may not be signilicantly allected.
`'
`PRECAUTIONS
`Eaaanl
`Inlusion concentrations of 20 mglmt. were associated with more venous irritation and thrombophlebitis than corr-
`wntrations at to mglmL Concentrations greater than to mgImL should. therelore. be avoided.
`Because the acid metabolite ol BREViBLOC° is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney. BREVIBLOC' (esmolol
`HCI)‘ should be administered with caution to patients with impaired renal tunction. The elimination hall-tile ol the
`acid metabolite was prolonged ten—told and the plasma level was considerably elevated in patients with end-stage
`renal disease
`.'
`'
`'
`tin latcraclim
`.
`Catr'achotarnine-depteting drugs. ea. reserpine, may have an additive ellect when given with beta blocking agents
`Patients treated concurrently with BBEVIBLOCo and a catecholamine depletor should theretore be closely observed
`for evidence at hypotension or marked bradymrdia. which may result in vertigo. syncope. or postural hypotension.
`A study at interaction between BR EVIBLUC' and warlarin showed that concomitant administration at BREVIELOC'
`and warlarin does not alter wartarin plasma levels. BHEVIBLDC° concentrations were equivomtty higher when
`given with warlarin, but this is not likely to be clinically important.
`
`f.
`
`

`

`NDA 19—386
`
`BREVIBLOC"
`
`INJECTION
`
`(ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE)
`
`INSERT - A43113
`
`
`
`AP i If
`
`When digoxin and BREViBLOG' ,(esmoioi Hill) were concomitantly administered intravenously to normal volunteers.
`there was a iii-20% increase in digoxin blood levels at some time points. Digoxin did not attect BREVIBLOC' phar-
`macokinehcs. When intravenous morphine and BHEVIBLOC' were concomitantly administered in normal subjects.
`no ellect on morphine blood levels was seen. but BREVIBLOC' steady-state blood levels were increased by 46% in
`the presence of morphine. No other pharmacokinetic parameters were changed.
`The eltect oi QHEVIELDC' on the duration ot.succinyidroiine-induced neuromuscular blockade was studied in pa-
`tietglrundg bin {surgery The onset oi ‘neuromuscutar blockade by succinyichoiine was unaltected by
`Eli _ IBLOC .
`t I qdprationoinetnomusduiar blockade was prolonged lrom 5 mlnutesto 3 minutes.
`Although the‘i traétiohs obsei'ved in'these‘sidoies do not appear to be at ’maior clinical impedance. BHEVtEILDC‘
`.wa a rn. .. u
`-
`“"
`shearid‘p‘e titrated.with‘ caution in patients béihg treated concurrently with digcxin. morphine. succlnyichoiine or
`Carcinogenesis. Mehgeusie. Impairment el Fertility
`Because at its short term usage no carcinogenicity. mutagenicity or reproductive periormance studies have been
`conducted with BHEVIBLOC'.
`
`Irngeaecyhteglory l:
`‘,
`-
`;
`'
`Teratogenrcity
`udtee in rats at intravenous dosages oi BREVIBLOC" up to 3000 mcglkglmin (ten times the maxi-
`mum human matntenance dosage) lor 30 minutes daily producedfino evidence oi maternal toxicity. unbryotoxicity
`or teratogenicity. while a dosage oi 10.000 mogilrglmin produced maternal toxicity and lethality. in rabbits. intrave-
`nous dosages up to 1000 mcgllrglmin tor 30 minutes daily produced no evidenceol matemal toxicity. ernbryotoxlci- .
`ty or teralogentcity. while 2500 moglkglmin produced minimal maternal toxicity and increased teta't resorptions.
`There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. BHEVIBLOC' should be um during
`pregnancy only it the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the lotus.
`iterate: letters
`it is not known whether BHEViBLOC' is excreted in human milk. however. caution should be exercised when
`BREVIBLOC‘ is administered to a nursing woman.
`tuner: use '
`The salety and etiectiveness ol BHEVIBLOC' in children have not been established,
`novertse nencrrorts
`_
`Seprmnbtcnlar Tachycardia
`The tollqwing adverse reaction rates are based on use at BBEVlBLOC' iecmoioi MCI) in almost 400 clin'iiat trial pa-
`tients with supraventricular tachycardia. in addition. over 600 patients have been exposed in clinical studies at
`other conditions. The most important adverse ellect has been hypotenslon (see Warnings). Most adverse eliects
`have been mild and transient.
`'
`'
`tiarllmgeeier - Symptomatic hypotension (diaphoresis. dizzinss) occurred in mt ol patients. and therapy was
`discontinued in about 11%, about hail oi whom were symptomatic Asymptomatic rhypotenslon occurred in about
`25% ct patients Hypotension resolved during BREVIBLOCO iniuslon in 6:!" ol these patients and within 30 minutes
`after discontinuation oi inluslon in 80% oi the remaining patients. Diaphoresis accompanied hypotension in 10% at
`patients Peripheral ischemia occurred in approximately 1% oi patients Pailor. tlushing. bradycardla (heart rate
`less than 50 beats per minute). chest pain. syncope. pulmonary edema and heart block have each been reported in
`less than til ct
`tientsin two patients without supraventricu ar tachycardia but with serious coronary artery dis-
`ease (post inie
`myocardial lnlarction or unstable angina). severe bradycardialsinus pauselasystole has devel-
`oped. reversible in both eases with discontinuation or treatment.
`'
`Central ileum l
`tear — Dizziness has occurred in 3% ct patients; somnoience in 3%. contusion. headache. and agi-
`tation in about 2 . and tatigue in about lit at patients. Paresthesia, asthenia. depression. abnormal thinking. anxi-
`ety. anorexia. and ilghtheadedness were reported in less than iii 0! patients One brlel (30 second) episode= ol grand
`mal seizure has been reported.
`'
`nerplretrry — Brmchospasm. wheezing, dyspnea. nasal congestion. rhonchi, and rates have each been reported in
`less than 1% cipatients.
`Eulreleluuul -' Nausea was reported in7ii of patients. Vomiting has occurred in about lit at patients. Dyspepsia.
`constipation. dry mouth. and abdominal discbmtort have 'each occurred in less than 1% ol patients. Taste perversion
`has also been reported.
`.
`'
`Skin ileiulen altri — tniusion site reactions including inflammation and induration were reported in about 8% ol pa-
`tients. Edema. erythema. skin discoloration. and burning at the intusion site have each occurred in less than 1% of
`patients
`‘
`Itiecellmm -— Each ol the lottowlng has been reported in‘less than 1% ct patients: Urinary retenUon. speech disor-
`der. abnormal vision. midscapuiar pain. rigors, and lever.
`’
`.
`OVEROOSABE
`'
`,
`Acute anlci
`A low casestc'rt massive accidental overdosage oi BHEViBLOC' (esmolol HCl) have occurred due to errors in dilution.
`These intravenous bolus doses at BREVIBLOCO at 5000—6250 meg/kg over 1-2 minutes have produmd hypotension.
`bradycerdia. drowsiness and toss oi consciousness the etlects have resolved within to minutes.” in some cases
`with administration at a pressor agent.
`Because oi its approximatelyre-minute elimination hall-lite. the first step in the management at toxicity should be
`to discontinue BREVlBLOC° iniuslon. Then. based on the observed clinical clients. the lottowlng general measures
`should also be considered:
`'
`lrelycerdie: intravenous administration oi atropine or another anticholinergr'c drug.
`Irensnupnn: intravenous administration at a beta, stimulating agent andlor a theophy'itine derivative.
`cardiac Failure: intravenous administration ot a diuretic andlor digitalis giyooside. in shock resulting tram inade-
`quate cardlc oontractitity. intravenous administration at dopamine; dobutamine. isoproterenot. or amrinone may be
`considered.
`'
`.
`Shortened: Hypateealn: Intravenous administration otttuids andlor pressor agents.'
`
`'4“—
`
`f
`'
`
`r
`
`~
`
`
`
`

`

`'fd
`
`'
`
`-
`NDA 19—386
`
`,
`
`inhaling: mm
`' NzI°3tw .RI‘I.'
`(:
`”A ° “L... 0 d Mil.“
`Reviewed by:
`a U
`
`r e 1 u
`
`2.5 g AMPULS ARE nor FDR ornecr lNTRAVENDUS INJECTION. mess DOSAGE roams ARE
`
`'
`
`ItiJECTION
`BREVJBLQC"
`.
`_
`_
`“ll 2.! "Pill
`I
`‘
`-
`i“
`ousnourro coutursredrtorr
`CONCENTRATED. PDTENT DRUGS WHICH MUST BE OILUTED PRIOR TO INFUSION. BREVIBLDC' SHOULD NOT BE
`ADMIXED WITH SODIUM BICARBONATE. BREVIELDC" SHOULD NOT BE MIXED WITH OTHER DRUGS PRIOR TO
`DILUTION IN A SUITABLE INTRAVENOUS FLUID. (See Compatibility Section. below.)
`lll
`.
`_
`'T'l'u gillL'aébi—éttltait n e 2155'
`
`
`1mm LLAsepticaily prepare a it) mgImL inlusion. by adding two 2.5 g ampuls to a 500 mL container. or one
`2.5 g ampul ioa 250 mL container. at a compatible intravenous solution listed below. (Remove average prior to dilu-
`tion as appropriate). This yields a iinal concentration at to mglm L.
`The diluted solution is stable tor at least 24 hours at room temperature. Note: Concentrations oi BHEVIBLDC' great-
`er than 10 mgImL are likely to produm irritation on continued inlusion (see Precautions). BREVIBLOC' has. howev-
`er. been well tolerated when administered via a central vein.
`lilti- till
`This
`sage lorm is prediluted to provide a ready-lo—use t0 mglmt concentration recommended for BREVIBLOC'
`intravenous administration. It-may be used to administer the appropriate BREVIBLOC' loading dosage inlusions by
`hand—held syringe while the maintenance inlusion Is being prepared.
`Supmellrlclitr tachycardia
`in the treatment at supraventricular tachycardia. responses to BREVIBLDC¢i usually (over 95%) occur within the
`range oi 50 to 200 mcg/kg/min. The average elleclive dosage Is approximately lilo mcgtkg/min although dosages
`as low as 25 moglirglmln have been adequate In some patients; Dosages as high as 300 mcgllrg/ min have been
`used. but these provide little added eiiect and an Increased rate ol adverse eiiects. and are not recommended.
`Dosage oi BHEVIBLDC' in supraventricuiar tachycardia must be individualized by titration in which each step con—
`sists oi a loading dosage lollowed by a maintenance dosage
`-
`To initiate treatment of a patient with supravenlricular tachycardia. administer a loading dosage inlusion oi 500
`moglkglmin oi BREVIBLDC' ior one minute lollowed by a 4 min maintenance inlusion at 50 mcglkglmln. ii an ade-
`quate therapeutic eiiect is not observed within live minutes. repeat the same loading dosage and tollow with a main-
`tenance inlusion increased to too mcglkglmin.
`-
`Continue titration procedure as above. repeating loading inlusion (500 mcglkg/min tor l minute), Increasing main-
`tenance inlusion by increments at 50 moglkgl min (ior 4 minutes). As the desired heart rate or a salety end-point
`(eg.. lowered blood pressure) is aépproached. omit the loading inlusion and reduce incremental dose in maintenance
`mm to minutes.
`inlusign Ivor)“ 5t) mcglkglmin to 5 mcg/kglmin or lower. Also. it desired. increase interval between titration steps
`This specilic dosage regimen has not been studied intraoperatively and. because oi the time required ior titration.
`may not be optimal tor intraoperative use.
`Maintenance dosages above 200 mcglkglmln have not been shown to have signiiiantly increased benefits, and the
`salety oi dosages above 300 mcg/kglmin has not been studied.
`in the event oi an adverse reaction. the dosage'oi BHEVIBLOC' may be reduced or discontinued. il a local inlusion .
`site reaction develops. an alternative inlusion site should be used. The use oi buttertly needles should be avoided.
`Abrupt cessation oi BREVIRLDC' inpatients has not been reported to pmduce the withdrawal'eilecls which may
`occur with abrupt withdrawal oi beta blockers ioilowlng chronic use in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. How-
`ever. mutton should still be used ln'abruptty discontinuing intusions nl BREVIBLOC' in CAD patients.
`After achieving an adequate control at the heart rate and a stable clinical status in patients with supravenlrlcular
`tachycardia. transition to allemative antiarrttylhmic agents such as propranolot. digoxin. or verapamll, may be ac-
`complished. A recommended guideline lor such a transition is given below but the physician should careiuily con-
`sider the labeling Instnrctions lor the alternative agertl selected:
`Alternative Melt
`bum
`Propranotoi hydrochloride
`10-20 mg o 4-5 h
`Dlgoxln
`0125-05 mg q 6 h [p.o. or iv.)
`Verapamll
`_
`80 mg q 6 h
`The dosage oi anal/romeo should be reduced as lollows:
`i.‘ Eh sanguine; lollowlng the iirst dose of the alternative agent. reduce the inlusion rate oi BREIIBLOC‘ by one-
`a Following the second dose at the allemative agent. monitor the patient's response and ii satlstactory control is
`maintained tor the first hour. discontinue BREVIBLOCO.
`-
`The use of lnluslons ol BREVIBLOC' up 'to 24-hours has been well documented; in addition. limited data tram 2MB
`hrs (N=48) indicate that BHEVIBLOC' ts well tolerated up to 48 hours.
`itntl Iltllilly with Ciro-all tired intravenous Field:
`_
`Bit '
`IBLOC' (esmolol HCI
`lNJEcilON was tested ior compatibility with ten commonly used intravenous tlulds at
`a (that concentration at it) mg esmolol Hcl per mL. BREVIBLOC° lNJECTiON was lound to be compatible with the
`totiowlrtg solutions and was stable lorat least 24 hours at controlled room temperature or under reirlgaratlon:
`Dextrose 5%) injection. USP
`.
`Dextrose 5%) ln Lactated Ringer's inlection
`Dextrose 5%: inRingerslnlection
`-
`Dextrose 5% and Sodium Chloride (0.45%) injection. USP
`Dextmse 5% and Sodium Chlodde (0.9%) injection. USP
`tactated Ringer's in'ection. USP
`Potassium Chloride I40 mquliler) in Dextrose (5%) intention. USP
`Sodium Chloride 0.45%] intention. USP
`Sodium Chloride 0.9%) injection. USP
`BREVIBLOC' lNJECTIDN was NOT compatible with Sodium Bicarbonate (5%) injection. USP.
`Ilia: Parenteral dntg products should be inspected visually ior particulate matter and discoloration prior to adminis-
`tration. wheneversolulion and container. permit.
`How surrt‘reu
`--0015-7|'100mg — lU'mL vial.Box at 20
`
`‘r
`'
`.
`is?
`
`“
`'o —W%E§€b
`STORE AT CONTROLLED ROOM TEMPERATURE (SET-85?. 15'-30'C). Freezing does not adversely ailect the prod-
`uct. but exposure to elevated temperaturs should be avoided.
`
`i
`
`/
`
`..
`
`I
`
`.3
`'
`
`I:
`
`MAY l
`
`1 BBQ
`
`,
`
`I
`,
`
`.'
`
`ilo rut "uncalled:
`~
`‘flflflu’ E.l. du Pont deiicmours and Company
`’Vrlilmtnnlort. Delaware tease
`Marcmlstit!
`
`'
`
`Malt:
`
`i
`
`,
`
`

`

`NDA 19—386
`
`BREVIBLOC‘
`
`INJECTION
`
`(ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE)
`
`1 GRAM AMPUL LABEL - A41201
`
`MAY 1
`
`i
`
`1989
`
`. ~ "mums -
`
`fiwwww%b~
`
`BREVIBLOC’E’)
`lesmnlal hpdrochlmidel
`lnjectiun [IOU mg/le
`lgm
`'
`
`IOrnLAMPUL
`
`USP.‘ wad-Ha A-qacqm'usa Bull-Id
`.
`W
`mmwwmuw i
`Wield-dam h ndjuu pH.
`not M Dunn lV. ruler-on
`nun ll mun“ upon us:
`.
`cwnou: Foo-u mew u. mm. m.- __
`mummmm.
`0
`H
`I
`fly
`ad Fund-Nuns..- run-Comp-
`E
`Mahmud-u... moo
`:
`
`,-~._
`
`

`

`NDA 19—386
`
`BREVIBLOC'
`
`INJECTION
`
`(ESMOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE)
`.
`1 GRAN AMPUL SHELF TRAY - AS7049 I
`
`RRRRWER
`
`BREVIBLOC“ .
`(osmolm HCI)
`..
`
`.
`
`DU PONT PHARMACEUTICALS
`@BREVIBLOC”
`
`%
`
`Iginjection
`l100mg/mL)
`
`_
`
`;
`
`Jill M"!
`
`O
`
`20-lfllflllls
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8007
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW! S!
`
`

`

`so.l
`
`APR l 8 1989
`
`l I
`
`!
`I
`
`,
`
`,
`
`I
`!2. NBA Number
`.'l. Organization
`'
`!
`l9-386
`!
`HFD — llo
`I
`!4. AF Number
`I3. Name and Address of Applicant (City & State)
`.1
`!
`!
`DuPont Critical Care
`I
`Supplementgsl
`!5.
`!
`l600 Naukegan Road
`!
`! Numbergsz I Dategsz
`!
`Naukegan,
`IL 59985
`'
`!
`I
`-
`.
`!7. Nonproprietary Name
`!6. Name of Drug
`.
`'
`!
`Esmolol Hydrochloride 9 5-007
`V! 4/6/89
`!
`Brevibloc
`'
`!
`!
`(LF)
`5
`!
`.
`'I
`.
`!8. Supplement(s) Provides For:
`!
`I
`!
`.9.
`Amendments and Other!
`(Reports, etc.) Dates!I
`.
`l
`
`CHEMIST'S REVIEW
`
`Labels and labeling for l g ampul,
`response to approvable letter of
`December 3l,
`l986.
`
`1
`
`V
`
`ll. How Dispensedllz; Related IND/NDA/DMF(s)
`!
`.10. Pharmaco_logical Category
`__
`!
`!
`Anti—adrenergic (B—receptor)‘
`X / / 0
`!
`9
`!
`IX
`!l3. Dosage Form(s)
`!
`l4. .Potency(ies)
`!
`!
`5
`Injection
`!
`lOO mg/mL, 250 mg/mL
`!
`I
`!
`IQ mg/mL
`:
`!
`. Re ords & Re ort’
`!lS. Chemical Name and Structure
`!
`E
`I
`!Current
`.
`.5
`'
`!
`!
`!
`L
`!
`!
`!Reviewed
`'
`No
`_
`l
`I
`Yes
`'
`
`l I
`I
`l
`:l7. Commentsr
`I
`I
`
`'
`
`'
`
`1
`
`,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-
`
`No
`
`Yes
`
`Labeling included is for the dosage of lOO mg/mL in lO'mL ampul or
`l g esmolol hydrochloride/ampul. Ampul
`label and tray label do not
`have expiration date or lot number. Expiration date and lot no. are
`stamped on at the time of the manufacture (CSO called for the infor-
`mation).
`Package insert — A43ll3. Rev. March 1989 — satisfactory for
`DESCRIPTION and HON SUPPLIED sections.
`V
`
`'
`
`'
`'
`'
`'
`I
`I
`:
`1
`I
`
`I I
`
`I I
`
`§_!l8. Conclusions and Recommendations
`‘i
`5
`'
`Insert is satisfactory for DESCRIPTION and HON SUPPLIED sections.
`!
`I
`Ampul and shell
`tray labels — satisfactory. Expiration date and lot
`%
`5
`number is stamped on at the time of the manufacture.
`l
`311.
`.
`'
`REVI NER
`-
`v
`1
`E
`'
`!Name
`‘ nature
`I Date Completed
`!Da
`“éb~ dzutvu/
`'
`.
`fig?
`'
`
`
`
`
`L_/Reviewer
`1_/Div. File
`~lDistribution
`Original Jacket
`
`
`Nang 0288c
`I
`g
`‘
`1_/ cs0 (McDOnald)
`
`I I
`
`'
`'
`'
`!
`!
`'
`'
`
`I 1
`
`I
`l
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
` _ 19-386/8007
`
`ADMINISTRATIVE and CORRESPONDENCE
`DOCUMENTS
`
`

`

`CSO Review of Final Printed Labeling
`NDA 19-386/3—007
`
`MAY 5
`
`l
`
`|939
`
`Date of submission:
`
`April 6, 1989
`
`Date of Review:
`
`April 22, 1989
`
`Applicant Name:
`
`_
`
`Dupont Critical Care,
`
`Inc.
`
`Product Name:
`
`‘Brevibloc (esmolol HCL)
`
`Injection
`
`Evaluation:
`
`This, supplement provides for the addition of the 1 gram strength to the
`Ampul, Shelf, Tray and Package Insert labels. The original NDA provided for
`this strength in theManufacturing and Controls section (Vol. 2.1)
`submitted on November 30, 1984. Dupont has not wished to market this
`strength until now.
`-
`
`There were no other changes from the last approved package insert.
`
`Ms. Cunningham‘s review found the DESCRIPTION and HOW SUPPLIED
`sections
`satisfactory.
`'
`
`Recommendation

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket