throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`Approval Package for:
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`NDA 19-386/5-004
`NDA 19-386/S-006
`
`Trade Name:
`
`Brevibloc
`
`Generic Name:
`
`Esmolol hydrochloride in sodium chloride
`
`Sponsor:
`
`Baxter Healthcare Corporation
`
`Approval Date: August 15, 1998 .
`
`Indications:
`
`For the rapid control of ventricular rate in patients with '
`atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in perioperative,
`postoperative, or other emergent circumstances where
`short term control of ventricular rate with a short-
`
`acting agent is desirable.
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH -
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`NDA 19-386/5-004
`
`NDA 19-386/8-006
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`
` LReviews / Information Included in this NDA Reviewj
`
`
`
`
`Approval Letter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A u _I rovable Letter
`
`
`
`Labeling
`
`Medical Review(s)
`
`Chemistry Review(s)
`
`
`
`Pharmacology Review(s)
`Statistical Review(s)
`
`Microbiology Review(s)
`Clinical Pharmacology/ Biopharmaceutics Review(s)
`Administrative/Correspondence Document(s)
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`NDA 19-386/5-004
`
`NDA 19-386/S-006
`
`APPROVAL LETTER
`
`

`

`3—00; (199/n
`S~ooz CM;32’
`.-
`‘
`'ni-iaafi
`MG 1 5 1988
`
`'
`
`'
`
`.
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`non 19~386/S-004
`5:006
`
`Inc.
`DuPont Critical Care.
`Attention:
`fir. John H. Haterman
`
`1600 Maukegan Rd.
`Haukegan,
`IL 58085
`
`Dear Mr. Hatennan:
`
`1
`Flease refer to your September 17,19S7 and July 12 .1988 supplemental new
`drug applications submitted under section 505(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug,
`and Cosmetic Act for Brevibloc (esmolol HCl) Injection.
`
`We also acknowledge receipt of your amendments to your September 17
`supplemental application dated November 19, 1987, March 10 and
`June 17. 30,'1988.
`The latter contained final printed labeling.
`
`Your September 17 supp1emental application provides for a new dosage form of
`Brevib1oc (esmoioi H61) consisting of a 10 mL single use vial containing
`95molol HCl 10 mg/mL (total of 100 mg) suitable for direct intravenous
`injection.
`
`Your July 12 supplemental application provides for final printed labeling
`revised to strengthen the Overdosage and Dosage and Administration sections of
`the package insert fer Brevibloc.
`
`We have completed the review of these supplementa1_ applications and they are
`approved.
`.
`
`He remind you that you must comply with the requirements for an approved NDA
`set forth under 21 CFR 314. 80 and 314. 81
`
`_
`
`’
`
`I
`
`p
`
`-
`
`.
`
`h
`
`Sincerelyvyours.
`-
`cc:
`1*
`__\
`67- ¢ ‘3!” 1"
`d‘r—fl”)
`Raymond J. Lipicky. n.n.
`HFD-llO/CSO
`Director
`HFD-80/DDIR
`Division of Cardio-Renal Drug Products
`_
`.
`HFD-lOO
`,
`Office of Drug-Evaluation I
`-
`Egg—gig (mth labehng)
`_
`_
`_
`.
`__
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Researc
`HFD--llO/KBongiovanni/7/11/888/1/88
`c1b/7/ll/_88,8/3/88/0850C Kg WW883"”
`R/D:
`IDCunningham/B/l/BB
`RMolters/8/1/88 '
`CResnick/8/1/88
`SChen/B/l/BB
`CGraham/B/l/BB
`NMorgenStern/B/Z/BB
`
`'-
`
`-
`
`V
`
`APPROVAL
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TION NUMBER:
`
`NDA 19-386/5-004
`
`NDA 19-386/S-006
`
`LABELING
`
`

`

`
`
`,‘L'!’
`.
`at- 1 l I‘v'?
`
`r-(L '
`
`
`AQUG i5|988
`
`BR-EVI BLOC” INJECTION
`(esmoioi hydrochloride)
`_
`liJ ltIL Ampll — 2.5]: HOT F0“ DIRECT INIHAVEN WM" I BE DillliED PRIOR TO ITS
`
`mrustou (see nosnce Alli] AleMiSTllAleli seer m.
`_
`to ml Single tiese rm — 100 mg
`AUG I 5 [988
`APPROVED
`
`DES Oil | PHI)"
`_
`BREVIBLUC° (esmoioi HCI) is a helm-selective (car ,
`i' blocking agent with a very
`short duration at action (elimination hall-tile is approximately 9 minutes). Esmoloi thl is:
`i:)—Melhyl p-[2-hydroxy-S-iisopropylamino) propoxyl hydrocinnamate hydrochloride and has the tollowing struc-
`ture:
`
`*
`
`CH.o,c0H.CH,—©>— OCH;CHOHCH,NHCH(CH,),-Hcl
`Esmoiol HCI has the empirical lormlua c|5H25N04ct and a molecular weight at 331.8. it has one asymmetric center
`and exists as an enantiorneric pair.
`'
`Bmolol 'HCl is a white to cit-white crystalline powder. it is a relatively hydrophilic compound which is very soluble
`pruprano oi.
`'
`in water and lreely soluble in alcohol. Its partition coelllcient ioctanoilwater) at pH 7.0 ls 0.42 compared to 17.0 tor
`iiitEVlBLOCo (esmoioi Hct) INJECTION is a clear, colorless to light yellow. sterile. nunpyrogenic solution tor intrave-
`nous iniusion alter dilution.
`-
`25 g. 10 mL Ampul — Each mL contains 250 mg esmoioi HCl in 25% Propylene Glycol. USP, 25% Alcohol. USP and
`Water ior Iniection._USP; buttered with 17.0 mg Sodium Acetate. USP, and 0.00715 mL Glacial Acetic Acid. USP.
`Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid added. as necessary. to adiust pH to 3.5—5.5.
`100 mg, 10 mL Single Dose Vial — Each mL contains 10 mg esmoioi MCI and Water tor injection, USP; bullered
`with 28 mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.546 mg Glacial Acetic Acid, USP. Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric
`acid added, as necessary. to adjust pH to 4.5-5.5.
`-
`'
`GliNiGAl PHARMACOLOGY
`.
`BREVlBLOC' (esmoioi MCI)
`is a helm-selective (cardioselective) adrenergic receptor blocking agent with rapid
`onset. a very short durationoi action. and no signilicant intrinsic sympathomirnetlc or membrane stabilizing activity
`at therapeutic dosages. its elimination hall-lite alter intravenous iniusion is approximately 9 minutes BREVIBLOCO
`inhibits the-betal receptors located chielly in cardiac muscle. but this prelerentiai etiect is not absolute and at
`higher doses it begins to-inhiblt beta2 receptors located chieily in the bronchial and vascular musculature.
`Phamacekloetics and Metabolism
`BREVlBLOC' (esmoioi HCl) is rapidly metabolized by hydrolysis ot the ester linkage. chletly by the esterases in the
`cytosot 01 red blood cells and not by plasma choiinesterasos or red cell membrane acetylchoilnesterase. Total body
`clearance in man was iound to be about 20 nglhr, which is greater than cardiac output; thus the metabolism of
`- BREVIBLOCI is not limited by the rate at blood tlow to metabolizing tissues such as the Ilveror attected by hepatic
`or renal blood ilow. BREl/lBLOC' has a rapid distribution hall-lite at about 2 minutes and an elimination hall—lite 01
`about 9 minutes. '
`Using an appropriate loading dose. steady-state blood levels oi BHEVlBLOC' tor dosages lrom 50-300 mcglkg/mln
`areobtained within live minutes. (Steady-state is reached in about 30 minutes without the loading dose.) Steady-
`state blood levels at BREVIBLOC' increase linearly over this dosage range and elimination kinetics are dose-
`independent over this range. Steady-state blood levels are maintained during iniusion but decrease rapidly after
`terrnlnation ol the iniusion. Because at its short hall-lite, blood levels at BREVIBLOC' can be rapidly altered by in'-
`creasing or decreasing the iniusion rate and rapidly eliminated by discontinuing the iniusion.
`Consistent with the high rate at blood-based metabolism oi BREVIbLOC', less than 2% at the drugls excreted un-
`changed in the urine Within 24 hours 0! the end oi iniusion, approximately 73-88% oi the dosage has been account—
`ed tor in the urine as the acid metabolite of BREVIBLOC'.
`Metabolism oi BREVlBLOC' results in the lormation oi the corresponding lree'acld and methanol. the acid metabo-
`me has been shown in animals to have about t/1500lh the activity at esmoioi and in normal volunteers its blood
`levels do not correspond to the level ot beta-blockade. The acid metabolite has an elimination halt-lite at about 3.7
`hours and is excreted in the urine with a' clearance approximately equivalent to the glomerular iiltration rate. Excre-
`tion at the acid metabolite is signilicantly decreased in patients with renal disease, with the elimination hail-lite in-
`creased to about ten-told that at normals, and plasma levels considerably elevated.
`Methanol blood levels. monitored in subjects receiving BREVIBLOC' tor up to 6 hours at 300 mcg/kglmin and 24
`hours at 150 mcglkg/min. approximated endogenous levels and were less than 2% of levels usually associated with
`methanol toxicity.
`'
`-
`boun .
`.
`BHEtflBLW' has been shown to be 55% bound to human plasma protein, while the acid metabolite is only 10%
`Phrmcattmnlcs
`.
`_
`».
`_
`.
`Clinical pharmacology slbdies'ln normal volunteers have confirmed the beta blocking activity 01 BHEVIBLOC' tes-
`moiol Hci). showing reduction in heart rate at rest and during exercise. and attenuation oi lsoproterenol-tnduced in-
`creases to heart rate. Blood levels oi BREVIBLOC' have been shown to correlate with extent oi beta blockade Alter
`termination oi iniusion. substantial recovery 1mm beta blockade is observed ln10-20 minutes.
`In human electrophysioiogystudies, BREVlBLDC' produced etlects typical oi a beta blocker: a decrease in the
`heart rate, increase In sinus cycle length, prolongation ol the sinus node recovery time. prolongation oi the All toler-
`val during normal sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing. and an increase in antegrade Wenckebach cycle length.
`in patients undergoing radionuclide angiography. BREVIBLDCO. at dosages ol 200 mcg/kg/min. produced reduc-
`
`

`

`‘i b, H 372.8
`
`8- / «err
`wound-v—m‘
`
`.1. .t.
`
`,1“ {RED
`
`
`
`UGi5i988
`
`
`Labeling: .
`Ro'd._fl:td
`
`RDA he :
`Reviewed by: 5 Q}; flange;
`
`trons-in heart rate. systolic blood pressure, rate pressure product. lelt and right ventricular ejection traction and car-
`drac index at rest. which were similar in magnitude to those produced by intravenous propranolol (4 mg). During ex-
`ercise. BREVIBLOCO produced reductions in heart rate. rate pressure product and cardiac index which were also
`similar to those produced by propranolol, but produced a significantly larger tall in systolic blood pressure. in pa-
`tients undergorng cardiac catheteriz'ation. the maximum therapeutic dose of 300 mcglkglmin oi BHEVIBLOC' pro-
`duced similar ellects. and. in additiorl. there were small. clinically insignificant. increases in the ielt ventricular end
`diastolic pressure and pulmonary capillary 'aiedge pressure. At thirty minutes alter the discontinuation oi
`BREVIBLOCO inlusion. all-oi the hemodynamic parameters had returned to pretreatment levels
`lnlusions cl
`The relative cardioselectivity ol BREVIBLOC' was demonstrated in to mildly asthmatic patients.
`BREVlBLOC° (too. 200 and 300 mcglkglmin) produced no signiiicant increases in specitic airway resistance com-
`pared to placebo. At 800 mcglkglmin. BREViBLOC' produced slightly enhanced bronchomotor sensitivity to dry air
`stimulus These ellects were not clinically signilicant, and tiiiEVlBLoco was well tolerated by all patients. Six ol
`the patients also received intravenous propranolol, and at a dosage at l mg. two experienced slgnilicant. symp—
`tomatic bronchospasm requiring bronchodilator treatment. One other propranolol-lreated patient also experienced
`dry air-induced bronchospasm. No adverse pulmonary ellects were observed in patients with COPD 'who received
`therapeutic dosages oi BREVlBLOC" tor treatment'ol supraventricular tachycardia (51 patients) or in pedoperative -
`settings (32 patients).
`,
`Srrpravenlrlcular Tachycardia
`in two multicent'er. randomized. double-blind. controlled comparisons ol BREVlBLOC' lesmoiol HCI] with placebo
`and propranolol, maintenance doses at 50 to 300 mcglkglmin ol BHEVIBLOCO were lound to be more ellective than
`placebo and about as ellective as propranolol, 345 mg given by bolus iniections. in the treatment of supraventricular
`tachycardia. principally atrial librillalion and atrial llutter. The majority ol these patients developed their arrhyth:
`mias postoperativeiy. About 60-70% at the patients treated with BREVIBLUC° had a desired therapeutic ellect
`(either a 20% reduction in heart rate. a decrease in heart rate to less than 100 bpm. or. rarely, conversion to' N38)
`and about 95% at those who responded did so ata dosage of 200 mcglkglmin or less. The average ellective dosage
`ol BREViBLOC' was approximately too-115 mcglkglmin in the two studies. Other multicenter baseline-controlled
`studies gave essentially similar results.
`in the comparison with propranolol, about 50% of patients in both-the
`BHEViBLOC° and propranolol groups were on concomitant digoxin. Response rates were slightly higher with both
`beta-blockers in the digoxin-treated patients.
`in all studies signiticant decreases at blood pressure occurred in 20-50% ol patients, identitied either as adverse
`reaction” reports by investigators. or by observation at 5 static pressure less than 90 mmHg or diastolic pressure
`less than 50 mmHg. The hypotension was symptomatic mainly diaphoresis ordizziness) in about 12% ot patients,
`and therapy was discontinued in about l1% ol patients. about hall at whom were symptomatic. in comparison to
`propranolol, hypotension was about three times as lrequent with BREVIBLOCO. 53% vs. 17%. The hypotensiort was
`rapidly reversible with decreased inlusion rate or alter discontinuation oi therapy with BREVlBLOC". For both
`HREVIBLOCo and propranolol, hypotension was reported less'lrequentiy in patients receiving concomitant dlgoxln.
`INDICATIONS AND IISAEE
`_
`-
`-
`SI ravonlricular Tachycardia
`B EVlBLOC‘ (esmcloi MCI) is indicated tor the rapid control at ventricular rate in patients with atrial librillalion or
`atrial llutter in perioperative. postoperative. or other emergent circumstances where short term control at ventricular
`rate with ashort-acting agent is desirable. i3l-‘tEVlt3LOCo is also indicated in noncompensatory sinus tachycardia
`where. in the physician's Judgement. the rapid heart rate requires specilic intervention. i'iltEVlBLOCo Is not intended
`lor use in chronic settings where transler to another agent is anticipated.
`'
`CONTRAINDICATIDNS .
`-
`BREVIBLOC" (esmcloi HCi) is contraindicated-in patients with sinus bradycardia, heart block greater than first
`degree, cardiogenic shock or overt bean lailure (see Warnings).
`WARNINGS
`ll etculan: in clinical trials 20-50% oi patients treated with BREVIBLDC’ (eSmolot HCl) have experienced hypoten-
`s on. generally delined as systolic pressure less than 90 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure loss than 50 mmHg. About
`12% at the patients have been symptomatic (mainly diaphoresis or dizziness). Hypotension can occur at any dose
`but is dose-related so that doses beyond 200 mcglkglmin are not recommended. Patients should be closely moni-
`tored. especially il pretreatment blood pressure is low. Decrease ot dose or termination ot inlusion reverses hypoten-
`sion. usually within 30 minutes.
`.
`Girdle: Ftlllrc: Sympathetic stimulation is necessary in supporting circulatory lunction in congestive heart tallure.
`and beta blockade carries the potential hazard of further depressing myocardial contractiiily and precipitating more
`severe lailure. Continued depression ol the myocardium with beta blocking agents over a period at time can. in
`some cases, lead to cardiac lailure At the lirst sign or symptom of impending cardiac failure. the dosage should be
`reduced or tittEVltiLocn should be withdrawn. Although‘this dosage adjustment or withdrawal may be sullicient
`age.
`.
`because at the short elimination hail-tile ol BREVlBLOC‘. specilic treatment'may also be considered. (See Overdose
`lruchosptguc ltlcgam: t'ATlEttTS llTil littlchltSFtsTll: itlSEASES stintlttt.
`til min“. IllT lEcEltE lETA
`IllicltEIS. Because oi its relative beta. selectivity and titratability. BREVIBLOC'a may-be used with caution in pa-
`tients with bronchospastic diseases. However. since betaI selectivity is not absolute. BHEVIBL‘OC‘ should be care-
`. lully titrated to obtain the lowest possible ellective dose In the event at bronchospasm. the inlusion should be ter-
`minated immediately; a beta2 stimulating agent may be administered il conditions warrant but should be used with
`particular caution as patients already have rapid ventricular rates.
`litrlutu Illiiilv: and iiyplgiycanir: BREVlBLOC' should be used with caution in diabetic patients requiring a beta
`blocking agent. Beta blockers may mask tachycardia occurring with hypoglycemia. but other manllestatrons such
`as dizziness and sweating may not be significantly allected.
`PRECAUTIONS
`--
`-
`-
`.
`.
`.
`General
`inlusion concentrations ol-20 mgImL were associated with morevenous irritation and thrombophlebitis than con-
`centrations at to mgImL. Concentrations greater than to mgimL should, the'relore, be avoided.
`Because the acid metabolite oi BHEViBLOC' Is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney, BREleLQCf_(esmotot
`' HCi) should be administered with caution to patients with impaired renal lunction. The elimination halt-lite ol the
`acid metabolite was prolonged ten-told and the plasma level was considerably elevated in patients with end-stage
`renal disease.
`'
`‘
`
`-
`,
`-
`'
`'.
`._
`_
`llrvg interaction:
`Catecbolamine—depleting drugs. e.g., reserpine. may have an additive ellect when given with beta blocking agents.
`Patients treated concurrently with BREVIBLOC° and a catecholamine depletor should thereloreibe closely observed
`tor evidence at hypotension or marked bradycardia. which may result in vertigo. syncope. or postural hypotension.
`-
`A study at interaction between BREVlBLflC' and warlarin showed that concomitant administration at BREVIBLOC’
`and warlarin does not alter warlarin plasma levels. BREVIBLOC° concentrations were equivocally'higher when
`
`_'
`
`

`

` Labeling: .
`. J.
`not so: [$325 ao-a. Hui
`“"1““ by‘ Wes:—
`
`
`
`~
`-
`given with warfarin. butti'iis isnot likely to be clinically important.
`When digoxln_'and' BR EVIBLUCF iesmotol HCI) were concomitantly administered intravenously to normal volunteers.
`there was a 10-20% increase‘in digdxin blood levels at some time points. Digoxin did not affect ITIiEVlIiLOC‘t phar-
`macokinetics. When intravenous morphine and BREVIBLOC' were concomitantly administered in normal subjects.
`no effect on morphine blood levels was seen. but'BltEVlBLlJCo steady-slate blood levels were increased by 46% in
`the presence of morphine. No other pharma'coklnetic parameters were changed.
`The effect of BITEVIBLOC' on he'
`‘
`' -induced neurornuscular blockade was studied In pa-
`tients undergoing surgery.
`he onset of neuromusc‘u r blockade by subcinylcholine was unaffected by
`Eli EVIBLOCEbut' the ddiatrq
`Ineurotfigchjafiqo‘gifide w prolonged irorn 5 minutes to B minutes.
`
`Although the interactions ob
`ed in these studies do not
`pear to be of maior‘clinical importance. HREVIBLOC‘
`
`war arm.
`
`should be titrated with muti
`. currently with digoxin. morphine. succinylcholihe or
`Carcinogenesis. Muta elects. impairment of Fertility
`Because of its short erm usage no carcinogenicity. mutagenicity or reproductive performance studies have been-
`conducted with BREVIELOC".
`_
`Pregnancy category c-
`.
`Teratogenicity studies in rats at intravenous dosages of BREVIBLOC' up to 3000 moglkglmin (ten times the maxi-
`mum human maintenance dosage) ior 30 minutes daily produced no evidence of maternal toxicity. embryotoxicity
`or teratogenicity. while a dosage of 10.000 mcglkglmin produced maternal toxicity and lethality. lo rabbits. intrave-
`nous dosages up to 1000 mcgfkglmin for 30 minutes daily produced no evidence of maternal toxicity. embryotoxici-
`ty or teratogenicity. while 2500 mcgllrg/mln produced minimal maternal toxicity and Increased fetal resorptions.
`There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. BHEVIBLOC'--shoufd be used during
`pregnancy only if the potential benefit Iustifies the potential risk to the fetus.
`Hurting Mother:
`.
`It is not known whether BREVIHLOG' ls excreted in human milk. however. caution should be exercised when
`BREVIBLOC° Is administered toa nursing woman.
`.
`Pediatric Ilse
`The safetyand effectiveness of BREVIBLOC‘ in children have not been establlshed.
`ADVERSE REAGT‘IIIIIS
`_.._
`.
`.
`Serum-tricolor Tachycardia
`The following adverse reaction rates are based on use of BREVIBLOC' (esmoloi Hcll In almost 400 clinical trial pa-
`tients with supraventricuiar tachycardia.
`In addition. over 600 patients have been exposed in clinical studies of
`other conditions The most important adverse effect has been hypotension (see Warnings). Most adverse effects
`have been mild and transient.
`-
`carllciucxlar — Symptomatic hypotenslon idiaphoresis. dizziness) oocu'riEd In 12% of patients and therapy was
`discontinued in about 11%. about half of whom were symptomatic. Asymptomatic hypotenston occurred In about
`25% of patients. Hypotensronr'esolved during BREVIBLOC' infusion in 63% of these patients and within 30 minutes
`after discontinuation of Infusion in 80% of the remaining patients. Uiaphoresis amompanied hypotension In 10% of
`patients. Peripheral ischemia occurred in approximately 1% of patients Pallor. flushing. bradyardla (heart rate
`less than 50 beats per minute), chest pain. syncope. pulmonary edema and heart block have each been reported In
`less than 1% of patients. In two patients without supraventricuiar tachycardia but with serious coronary artery dis-
`ease (post inferior myocardial infarction or unstable angina). severe bradyaardia/sinus pause/asystole has devel-
`. oped. reversible In both cases with discontinuation of treatment.
`Central llama; 3 tall -- Dizziness hasoccurred in 3% of patients; somnoience in 3%,confusion. headache. and agi-
`tation in about
`. and fatigue In about fit of patients. Paresthesia. asthonla. depression. abnormal thinking. anxi-
`ety. anorexia. and lightheadedness were reported in less than 1% of patients One brief (30 second) eplsodeof grand
`mat-seizure has been reported.
`'-
`‘
`'
`Ilsplntery i Bronchospasm. wheezing. dyspnea. nasal congestion. rhonchi. and rates have each been repdited In
`less than't Scot patients.
`Glalraiaiaatlaal — Nausea was reported In 7% of_ patients. Vomiting has occurred in abouttlibf patients. Dyspepsia.
`constipation, dryrnouth. and abdominal discomfort have each occurred in less than 1% of patients. Taste perversion
`has also bwn reported.
`‘
`'
`Side Ilafualon site] -— Infusion site reactions including inflammation and lnduratlon were reported In about 8% ofpa-
`tlents. Edema. erythema. skin discoloration. and burning at the infusion site have each occurred in less than 1% of
`patients
`‘
`_
`.
`._
`lilacellaaeaaa — Each of the following has been reported in-tess than 1% of patients: Urinary retention. speech disor-
`der.‘ abnormal vision. midscapular pain. rigors. and fever.
`.
`flVElIIIIJSAEE
`..
`_
`-
`.
`Acute Toxicity
`A few cases of massive accidental overdosage of BREVIBLOC' (esmolol HCI) have occurred due to errors In dilution;
`These intravenous bolus doses of BREVIBLOC" of 5000-5250 mcglkg over 1-2 minutes have produwd hypotension;
`bradycardia. drowsiness and loss of consciousness. The effects have resolved within 10 minutes. in some cases
`with administra'tion‘of a pressor agent.
`.
`'
`‘
`Because of its approximately 9-minute elimination half-life. the first step In the management of toxicity should be
`to discontinue the BHEVIBLOC‘ infusion. Then, based on the observed clinical effeds. the-following general mea-
`sures should also beconsidered;
`‘
`'
`'
`'
`' "
`.
`I
`lra'dyi‘arliafini'ravenous administration of atropine or another antichoiinergic drug.
`E
`Ircochcpaan: Intravenous administration of a beta, stimulating agent and/or a theophylllne derivative.
`Cardiac Fall-re: intravenous administrationoi a diuretic and/or digitalis giycosichn shock resulting from inade-
`quate cardiac contractility. intravenous administration of dopamine, dobutamine. isoproterenol;or amrinone may be
`mnsidered.
`'
`Symptomatic Ifypotemlon: Intravenous administration of fluids and/or pressor agents
`
`

`

` Labeling: .
`J.
`not No: 19—3225 ne'e._fl:u.Ir
`“Mend Mr:W
`
`
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`DOSAOPE AND ADMINISTRATION
`2.5 I AM Ill
`THE 2.5 g AMPUL IS NOT FOR DIRECT INTRAVENOUS INJECTION. THIS DOSAGE FORM IS A CONCENTRATED.
`POTENT DRUG WHICH MUST BE OILUTEO PRIOR TO [TS INFUSION. BREVIBLDC‘ SHOULD NOT BE ADMIXEO
`WITH SODIUM BICARBONATE. BREVIBLOCo SHOULD NOT BE MIXEO WITH OTHER DRUGS PRIOR TO OILUTION IN
`A SUITABLE INTRAVENOUS FLUID. (See Compatibility Section below.)
`'
`ltlluliu: Aseptically prepare a to mglmL inlusion. by adding twp 2.5 g ampuis lo a 500 mL container. or one 2.5 g
`amput to a 250 mL container. at a compatible intravenous solution listed below. (Remove overage prior to dilution as
`appropriate). This yields a' linal concentration at to mgImL. The diluted solution is. stable for at least 24 horns at
`room temperature. Note: Concentrations ol BREVIBLOCo greater than 10 mglmL are likely to produce irritation on
`continued II'IIIJSIDI'I (see Precautions). BREVIBLOCO has. however, been well tolerated when administered via a cen-
`tral vein.
`'
`.
`.
`Itili ng-illM.
`This dosage (arm is prediluted to provide a ready-to—use lo mglmL concentrationrecommended lor Brevibioc' in-
`travenous administration.
`it may be used to administer the appropriate Brevibloc° loading dosage inlusions by
`hand-held syringe while the maintenance infusion is being prepared.
`_
`Supnvratricular Tachycardia
`In_ the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. responseslto BHEVIBLOC' usually (over 95%) occur within the
`range or 50 to 200 mcglkglmin. The average ellective dosage is approximately 100 mcglkglmin although dosages
`as low as 25 mcglkglmin have been adequate in some patients Dosages as high as 300 mcglkglmin have been
`used. but these provide little added ellect and an increased rate at adverse ellects. and are not recommended.
`Dosage ol DREVIBLOC“ in supraventricular tachycardia must be individualized by titration in which each step con-
`sists of a loading dosage followed by a maintenance dosage".
`.
`'
`To initiate treatment at a patient with supraventricular tachycardia. administer a loading dosage Infusion of 500
`mcglkglmin oi BREVIBLOC° lor one minute tollowed by a 4 min maintenance inlusion 'ol 50 mcglkglmin. it an ade-
`quate therapeutic effect is not observed within live minutes. repeat the same loading dosage and follow with a main-
`tenance inlusion increased to too mcglkglmin.
`Continue titration procedure as above, repeating loading inlusion (500 mcglkglmin tort mtnute).'increasing main-
`tenance inlusion by Increments at 50 meg/kg! min (tor 4 minutes). As the desired heart rate or a salety end-point
`(eg.. lowered blood pressure) is appmached. omit the loading inlusion and reduce incremental dose in maintenance
`Inlusioo from 50 mcglkglmin to 25 mcglkglmin or lower. Also. it desired. increase interval between titration steps
`lr_om 6 to in minutes.
`this specific dosage regimen has‘ not been studied intrauperatively and. because ol the time required lor titration.
`may not be optimal lor intraoperative use.
`Maintenance dosages-above 200 mcglkglmin have not been shown to have significantly increased benefits. and the
`safety of dosages above 300 mcglkglmin has not been studied.
`in the event of an adverse reaction. the dosage ol BREVIBLDC'may be reduced or discontinued if a local Infusion
`site reaction develops. an alternative inlusion site should be used. The use of butterfly needles should be avoided.
`Abrupt cessation of BREVIBLOC" in patients has not been reported to produce the withdrawal effects which may
`oocurwith abrupt withdrawal ol beta blockers lollowing chronic use in coronary artery disease (CAD)'natients How-
`ever. caution should still be used in abruptly discontinuing inlusions ul BREVIBLOC' in CAD patients
`Alter achieving an adequate control of the heart rate and a stable clinical status in patients with supraventricular
`tachycardia. transition to alternative antiarrhythmic agents such as propranolol. dignxin. or verapamll. may be ac-
`complished. A recommended guideline lor such a transition is given below but the physician should carefully con-
`sider the labeling instnrctions lor the alternative agent selected:
`-
`Alternative
`all
`lineage
`-
`Propranolol ydrochloride
`lit-20 mg q Hit]
`Digoxln,
`0.1 25-115 mg q 6 n (no or iv.)
`Verapamil
`80 mg q 6 h
`The dosage of DR EVIBLOC;c should be reduced as Ioiiowszv
`.
`l. WI? gan’i‘nutes following the first dose at the alternative agent. reduce the infusion rate of t‘iliiEillBLOCo by one-
`ha
`.
`'
`‘
`'
`-
`Z Following the second dose at the alternative agent. monitor the patient's response and ii satislactory control is
`maintained (or the iirst hour. discontinue BREVIBLOC.o
`'
`The use at tnlusions oi BREVIBLOC° up to 24 hours has been well documented: in addition. limited data lrom 24-48
`hrs (N=48) Indicate that BREVIBLOCm is well tolerated up' to 48 hours.
`_
`lion Itiilility with Comment
`tired Intravenous Fluids
`g
`BR
`iBL'DC' (esmolol'HCl
`INJECTION was tested for compatibility with ten commonly used intravenous lluids at
`a lihal concentration at 1Q. mg esmolol HCI per mL. BREVIDLOC‘ INJECTIDN was lound to be compatible with the
`(allowing solutions and was stable tor at least 24 hours at controlled room temperature or unde'r'reIrigeratlon: '
`Dextrose (5%) lnieCtion. USP
`,
`_
`.
`__
`Dextrose (5%) in lat-Stated Ringer's Inlection
`.Dextr'ose (5%) In Ringer's lnlection
`_
`Dextrose (5%) and Sodium Chloride (0.45%) ln]ectipn.USP
`Dextrose (5%) and Sodium Chloride (0.9%) injection. USP
`Lactated Ringer'sln eclion. USP
`'
`.
`'
`Potassium Chloride 40 mquliter) in Dextrose (5%) l
`niecticn. USP
`Sodium Chloride (0.45%) injection. USP
`Sodium Chloride (0.9%) Injection. USP
`--
`.
`BREVIBLDC' INJECTION was NOT compatible with Sodium Bicarbonate (5%) Injection. USP. .
`lute: Parenteral d’rugiprdducts should be inspected visually lor particulate matter and discoloration prior'to admin- '
`istration. whenever solution and container permit. '
`'
`.
`'
`.'
`HOW SUEI’IJEDf-f
`-
`.
`.
`rtDc boot-got 5:71, too mg -— to mL vial. Box at go
`NDC moieties-1 e. 2.5 g — to mL ampui. Box 'or 10
`STORE AT CONTROLLED ROOM TEMPERATURE l59'-86'F. 15'—30‘C). Freezing does not adversely affect theprod-
`not. but exposurelto elevated temperatures should be avoided.
`_
`_
`_
`'
`'
`-. Dtr'Pont-Pharmaoeuticals
`E. I. duPopt de Nemours and Company
`Wilmington. Delaware 19898
`--'----_=
`Date: May. 1988
`
`A43049
`
`.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`. APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`I
`
`NDA 19-386/5-004
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW! S!
`
`

`

`.
`
`CHEMIST'S REVIEW
`
`9.904
`
`MAR 15 l988
`
`
`
`' 1. Organization
` 2. NDA Number
`
`urn-110
`l9-386
`4. AF Number
`
`
`
`5
`Su . figment 5-,
`
`_I_-
`5-005‘
`9/]7/87
`
`3. Name and Address of Applicant City & State
`DuPont Critical Care,
`Inc.
`
`1600 Waukegan Road
`
`Waukean.
`IL 60085
`. Name of Drug
`BREVIBLOC
`
`.Nonproprietary Name
`Esmolol Hydrochloride
`
`
`
`9.
`
`
`
`8. Supplement 5) Provides or:
`A new dosage form, comprising a new formulation
`Amendments and Other
`
`
`
`
`and a new container/closure system. Also provide~
`(Reports, etc.) Dates
`
`for additional clinical
`indication for BREVIBLOC.
`ll/l9/87
`
`
`
`
`
`ll. How DiSpensed l2. Related IND/NDA/DMF s
`
`
`0. Pharmaco ogical Category
`'Anti-adrenergic (B—receptor)
`
`‘
`Ix—7 RX/—7 01c
`
`
`
`3. Dosage Form 5
`l4.
`'otency ies
`Injection
`l0 mg/mL or 100 mg/lO m
`
`l5. Chemical Name and Structure
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`.
`
`
`
`
` Reviewed
`
`Yes
`
`
` l7. Comments
`See attached pages.
`
`
`Included in the draft labeling is the recommendation for administering an
`
`
`80 mg_ loading dose of BREVIBLOC over 30 seconds,
`to initiate immediate
`
`
`control of intraoperative tachycardia or hypertension.
`The loading dose is
`
`
`to be followed by a constant
`infusion.
`The 100 mg single use vial re-
`presents a safe, convenient means of initiating therapy by slow intravenous
`
`
`injection while the infusion dilution is being prepared.
`.
`
`18. Conclusions and Recommendations
`AE pending submissio-n of additional sta-
`
`
`
`bility data. With the exception of expiration dating, manufacturing and
`
`
`
`controls information are satisfactory. Need additional stability data_
`
`before the requested 24 month expiration date could be approved.
`
`
`r-
`Deficiencies in labels and package insert:
`A————7——————-————-—--—---1
`.
`
`
`
`
`DESCRIPTION section for the l0 mg/mL product should include
`quantities of the other ingredients present in the injection.
`If one
`patkage insert will be used for both strengths. the header (p. 93)
`infor-
`' mation should be added to-the current insert information.
`HON SUPPLIED -
`satisfactory as proposed.
`Company agreed to revise the labeling as
`
`[_/Div. File
`
`Date Completed
`March l5,
`l988
`
`

`

`CHEMIST'S REVIEW
`
`1.
`
`Organization
`HFD — llO
`
`
`
`
`
`. Name and Address of Applicant (City & State)
`DuPont Critical Care,
`Inc.
`1600 Naukegan Road
`'
`
`JUN 411988
`
`
`2. NBA NUmber
`19—386
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Suglement
` sNher5 Date 5
`
`
`6. Name of Drug
`'7. Nonproprietary Name
`
`6/30/88
`Brevibloc
`S—004
`Esmolol Hydrochloride
`
`
` '. Supplement(s) Provides For:
`
`Amendments and Other
`
`
`(Reports, etc.) Dates
`. 9/17/87, 3/l0/88 ,
`6/8/88
`
`Final printed labeling
`
`
`l0. Pharmacological Category
`Anti —adrenergic (8 receptor)
`
`.How Dispensed l2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Reviewed
`-Yes
`
`
` l7. Comments
`Carton and vial
`labels are included. Lot No. and expiration date are not
`
`
`
`included on the label.
`Package inSert (A43094,May,1l988) - DESCRIPTION section — satisfactory,
`HON SUPPLIED section - satisfactory.
`
`
`
`‘ l3. Dosage Form(s)
`Injection
`
`/X/ RX /
`I OTC
`l4. Potency(ies)
`10 mg/mL

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket