throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`- Approval Package for:
`
`/
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8001 and 8002
`
`Trade Name:
`Brevibloc Injection
`"Generic Name: Esmolol Hydrochloride
`
`Sponsor:
`Dupont Critical Care, Inc.‘
`V Approval Date: August 15, 1988
`
`Indicatibns:
`
`Short-Term control of heart rate in patients
`with abnormally fast heart rhythms such as
`artrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or sinus
`
`'
`
`tachycardia.
`
`'
`
`'
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`19—386/8001 and 8002
`
`CONTENTS
`
`
`
`g—Reviews / Information Included in this NDA Review.=l
`
`
`
` Approval Letter
`
`
`
`A) rovable Letter
`
`Labeling
`
`
`Medical Review(s)
`
`Chemistry Review(s)
`
`
`
`Pharmacology Review(s)
`
`
`
`Statistical Review(s)
`
`Microbiology Review(s)
`
`Clinical Pharmacology/ Biopharmaceutics Review(s)
`
`
`Administrative/Correspondence Document(s) I
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8001 and $002
`
`APPROVAL LETTER
`
`

`

`4
`
`..
`
`.
`noniw-wws-am
`Sr006
`
`-
`
`'
`
`*
`
`‘
`
`‘ oboe Odie/3
`~00} Que-fl [7/2
`.
`—
`km};
`MG l5 [988 ,
`
`DuPont Critical Care, Inc.
`Attention: Mr. John H. Haterman
`
`1600 Maukegan Rd.
`Haukegan,
`IL 60985
`
`Dear Mr. Waterman:
`
`.
`l988 supplemental new
`Please refer to your September l7, l987 and July 12,
`drug applications submitted under section 505(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug.
`and Cosmetic Act for Brevibloc (esmolol HCl) Injection.
`
`He also acknowledge receipt of your amendments to your Septanber l7
`supplemental application dated November l9, l987, March 10 and
`June l7,’30,'1988.
`The latter contained final printed labeling.
`
`- Your September 17 supplemental application provides for a new dosage form of
`Brevibloc (esmolol HCl) consisting of a lo mL_single use vial containing
`esmolol Hcl
`l0 mg/mL (total of 100 mg) suitable for direct intravenohs
`injection.
`
`Your July 12 supplemental application provides for final printed labeling
`revised to strengthen'the Overdosage and Dosage and-Administration sections_of
`the package insert for Brevibloc.
`
`-
`
`We have completed the review of these supplemental,applications and they are
`approved.r
`_
`,
`‘
`He remind you that you must comply with the requirements for'an approved RDA
`set forth under 2l CFR’3li.80.and 3l4.8l.
`'
`
`-
`
`i
`
`_
`
`'
`
`-
`
`3‘
`
`'
`
`_
`
`V
`
`‘
`
`Sincerely‘yours!
`I
`2
`.cc:
`'
`M" 75'
`mfifi'
`61' it w /
`_' HFD'B—T—Jo '
`_-
`Raymond J. Lipicky, H.D.
`"
`-HFD-110/CSO
`Director
`,
`_
`HFD~80IDDIR
`Division of CardiorRenal Drug Products
`_ l'
`1
`HFD-lOO
`.
`Office of Drug-Evaluation I
`--
`Eggggg (with abe mg)-
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`HFD—llO/KBongiovanni/7/ll/88;8/l/88
`c1 b/7/ll/_88 {8/3/88/0850C W 83458
`MD: DCunningham/B/l/BB 15‘5"?“
`'
`RWolters/B/l/BB
`CResnick/8/l/88
`SChen/B/l/88.
`CGraham/S/l/BB
`NMorgenStern/B/Z/BS
`
`_
`

`
`APPROVAL
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`’
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`19—386/S001 and 8002
`
`APPROVABLE LETTER
`
`

`

`m 19~39m~om
`/3~902
`
`AUG
`
`.1 c
`
`nuPant Cr1t1ca1 Care. Inc.
`~Attenfl'em Hr. Jehn H. Haterman
`'1669 wankegan Road
`Wankegan;
`IL 60985
`
`Eear Er. Waterman:
`
`'P1ease- rEfEr ta your January 21 1987 inpp1amanta1 new drug appl1cat1-ans
`s-ubm1tted under Se¢t1nn 505(-b)(1) of t—he Fadara1 Food, Drug, and Cosmet1c Act
`far Brev1E1aa (esma1o1 hydroeh1ar1de) Injection. We also acknow1edge rece1pt
`on March 3, 1-987 of yen-r supp1ementa1 new drug app11ea-t10n (5-692) dated
`Fehruury 13.1.987‘
`_
`
`This la-tfier E156 Eonf1rms year aa1y 21. 1981 ta1-cphena converéat1ea E1th
`'flr. flEry Eueh1er.
`Ha adv1sed you t.Eat fer Edm1n1strat1ve purposes. «a have;
`renumbered year January 21
`sn—pp1emanta1 app11-cation.
`E;
`Eh: EEEEEemenEul Eag11aat1aas previde fur :.
`1
`
`danuary 21. Isails~flfli
`
`_
`
`An add1£tona1 destfs farm 31 a 15 EL stkgfggEase
`
`v1e1 9f arev1b1oe 'Gsmo101 hydroeh1ar1dg
`IEJEEE1EE.
`
`February 13. 198118~962
`
`F1ua1 pr1ntad labc1ing rkvised as 1311.5ws:
`
`1.
`
`‘aextresa (5%} 1E Lactufiad R1ager‘s In:net1na* :111 he
`ndflad ta 1E3 11-51 of fairavaneus f1u1és 1ntn uhEEE
`Brav1btvc mg; Ea<d1iatefi.
`
`-
`
`'3;
`
`'ffi1s 33.3111: dating nae idmfiu1struu1aa Figfiuga his 56%
`EEEE. stadieé tutraepartttva1y aaE.EEElune-E1'fihe E.1EE
`,requ1red far t1nrasfan, any net be opt1ma1 fbr intEE«
`' -T3at1ve aae.‘ «111 he 1nEeEtEd as a fienrtfi paragriph
`
`
`[qu LED EEHEHIEERATIGH « Superventr1eu1av
`Taehyesrm1a.
`HE have«.mE1Etad tan rev1ew of these suupieEEEEET upy1faae1-Ens as :Ehmittad
`E ffi‘draft 14Eg11nge Befara tugs; supy1amuats may be EEprEvad. hawavar.
`1-E
`Ee-geaaaaav
`E‘
`r yaw ta submit .v1E.'EEE anEeE EErtaE 1abe1s and f1—na1
`
`
`“E
`. 1EEB11
`If Edd1§1onq1 informatian rai-attug he the safety or
`
`:EE
`‘ “ iii a? EE1§ Erag Eseamas EEE11EE1¢ -befhre we reee1ve the f1ua1
`.aEe11ag, rav1s1an oE EEEE 1a§a11ng mEy Ea Esqu1rad.
`
`'13ease snbm1t twa1ve eEp1es of the printed 1nEg1s and 1abe11ng seven of uh1eh
`.-a:Ee 1nd1v1dua11y mnunted an heavy we1ght papEr 9r 51m112r mater1—n1.
`
`

`

`Pa g: 2-
`
`Hith1n 10 days after the date of this letter. yen are required to amen-d these
`sup 1ementa1 app11catiens.. nat1fy us of ynur intent ta 1116 an amendmant, or
`fa1 6w one of your ether apt1ans under 21 CFR 314 110.1» the absence 9? sash
`a§t1on FDA may take 2611071 to w1thdraw these supglemental a‘pplieaflans.
`317117113113: (asmalm hydrotmoflde) Injection in 113 1111- Single 631: vials may not
`be 1123111137 marketed unti'l yen haw: been notified in 177771121119 that 121113
`supplemental 111171 1111:1911 is approved.
`
`Shea-I'd yea 1mm any quesuiws. p1 9191 contact:-
`
`1111. mama Henry
`Censunfir Safety Officer
`Ta} 2131101197
`(331) 4113-4731)
`
`smear-91y years -.
`
`1L4 7171/37
`
`111mm 4. Links-11y. NJ}...
`_ aviator
`1111713101: at 61111104131111 Drug Pies-dares};
`11111111 771‘ Drug Research and 119771“ ,7“
`Center far 11mins and 316101“:
`570’
`L!"
`
`$'
`
`
`
`HFN~IIGICSO
`HFN~713$G£h1_
`.
`HFH~snraa1R
`HFN~11E1I511¢1varsenl7l2l87
`'
`111111”71111151777777.7777
`HE er
`,
`SHalvarsen/7/6/a7;7/27/s7; 7/23/87 ,A.1uax¢1~44m1'
`Rmelters/7/7/87: 7/27/8-7
`NMorgenstemfl/‘ZB/fi?
`7/.3 l/5’ 7
`
`..
`
`fl
`
`1131/95‘
`
`APPROVABLE
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8001 and S002
`
`LABELING
`
`

`

`
`
`Iia’bel In; 3
`
`him HerMRo'd. r
`n‘_a-_-a L'.: K2 in,
`
`'
`
`
`
`-_ BREVIBLO‘U I’NJ '
`(esmololhydrochloride)
`Ill lnl Milli! — 2.5 |: NOT FOR BIRECT INTRAVENOUS INJECTIONJMPIJL Mil
`988
`'
`illFustilli [SEE lidSAiiE Al'iil -AGMiNlSTIATION SEGTlOlII.
`”JG I 5 l -
`ill rill. Stella Um ml —' iflil up
`,
`DESCRIPTION
`BHEVlBL069'iesmolol HCl) is a beta,-seiectiire (cardioselective) adrenergic receptor blocking agent with a very
`short duration of action (elimination half-lite is approximately 9 minutes). Esmoiol HCI is:
`( :)-lllethyl p-t2-hydroxy-3-[isopropylaminoi propnxy] hydrocinnamale hydrochloride and has the loilowing struc-
`ture:
`'
`,
`'
`
`Epsom
`
`on.o,ccn.cn.@ocn.cnoncn.nncn(cn,t..Hot
`ESmaloi flat has the empirical lormiua CyalizaNDwI and a molecular weight of 3313. it has one asymmetric center
`and crisis as an enantiumerlc pair.
`‘
`Esmclol HCl is-a white to oil-white crystalline powder. It is a relaiitIely hydrophilic compound which is very soluble
`in water and ireeiy soluble in alcohol. its partition coefficient toctanotlwater) at pit 7.0 is 0.42 compared to 17.0 ior
`propranoiol.
`-
`ensvroLoco (esmolol iiCli INJECTION is a clear. colorless to light yellow. sterile. nonpyrogertic solution for intrave—
`nousiniuslon alter dilution
`'
`2.5 g. 10 mL Ampui — Each mL contains 250 mg esmolol list in 25% Propylene Glycol. USP. 25% Alcohol. USP and
`Water for injection. USP; buiiercd with t7.0 mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.00715 mL Glacial Acetic Acid. USP.
`Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid added. as necessary. to adiust pH to 3.5-5.5.
`ioo mg. to Mt Single Dose Vial
`-— Each mL contains 10 mg esmolol HCI and Water for injection. USP; buffered
`with 2.8 mg Sodium Acetate. USP. and 0.546 mg Glacial Acetic Acid. USP. Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric _
`acid added. as necessary. to adiust pH to 4.5-5.5.
`-
`.
`.
`Bllllliilil PHARMACOIJJIIV
`-
`liliEVlBflle:o (esmolol
`lEICI) is a beta.-selectlve (cardioselective) adrenergic receptor blocking agent with rapid
`onset. a very short’duratmn of action. and 'no significant intrinsic sympaihoinimetic or membrane stabilizing activity
`at therapeutic dosages. its elimination half-lite alter intravenous iniusion is approximately 9 minutes. BlilEViBLOCo
`inhibits the beta, receptors located chiefly in cardiac muscle. but this preferential eltect is not absolute and at
`higher doses it begins to inhibit beta, receptors located chiefly in the bronchial and vascular musculature
`-
`Phrrrrrmlrluticr and Metabolic-
`.
`.
`-
`BREVIBLDC' (esmololHCl) is rapidly metabolized by hydrolysis of the ester linkage. chielly by. the esterases in the
`cytosot of red- blood cells and not by_plasma cholinesterasrs or red cell membrane acetylcholinesterase. Total body
`clearance in man was lound to beabout 20 nglhr. which is greater than cardiac output; thus the metabolism of
`. BREVIBLOC° is not limited by the rate of blood flow to metabolizing tissues such as the liver.or attested by hepatic
`a
`ut minutes.
`.
`orbgena; blood flow. BREVlBLOC° has a rapid distribution hall-Iiie at about 2 minutes and an eliminationhali-iile of
`Using an appropriate loading dose. steady-state blood levels of BREVIBLDC' lordosagos lrom 50400 mcglkglmin
`are obtained within five minutes. (Steady-stale is reached in about 30 minutes withwt the loading dose.) Steady-
`state blood levels at BHEVIBLOC° increase linearly over this dosage range and elimination kinetics are dose-
`independent over this range. Steady-stale blood levels are maintained during infusion but decrease rapidly alter
`termination of the infusion. Because at its shirt halt-life. blood levels of BREVlBLOCl’ can be rapidly altered by In-
`creasing ordecreasing the infusion rate andrapidly'eliminated by discontinuing the lnlusion.
`. Consistent with the high rate of blood-based metabolism oi.BRE\ilBLOC'. less than 2% of the drug is excreted un-
`changed in the urine.,Within 24 hours of the end of inlusiori. approximately 73—88% of the dosage has been account-
`’
`ed for in the urine as the acid metabolite of BREVIBLOC'.
`-
`Metabolism oi BHEVIBLOTJ' results in the formation of the corresponding free acid and methanol. The acid metabo-
`lite has been shown in animals to have about 1/1500th the activity of esmolol and in normal volunteers its blood
`levels do not-correspond to the level of beta-blockade. The acid metabolite has an elimination hail-tile oi about 3.7
`hours and is excreted in the urine'with a clearance approximately equivalent to the glomeru'lar liltration'rate. Excre-
`'tion of the acid metabolite is significantly decreased‘in patients with renal disease. with the elimination hall—tile in-
`creased to about ten-fold that o normals; and plasma levels considerably elevated.
`.
`Methanol blood levels. monitored in subiects receiving BHEVIBLOC' for up to 6 haurs at 500 mcglkglmin and 24
`met an
`toxicity.
`-
`,
`houas at; 50 mcglkglmin. approximated endogenous levels and were less than 2% of levels usually associated with
`con .
`'
`'
`-
`gHEthLOGG has bee‘n'shown to be 55% bound to human plasma protein. while the acid metabolite is only 10%
`Phrncodyaanlcl
`.
`.
`Clinical pharmacology studies in normal volunteers have confirmed the beta blocking activity at BREVIBLOC' (es-
`molol HCi). showing reduction in heart rate at rest and during exercise. and attenuation at lsoproterenol-induced in-
`creases in heart rate. Blood leveisol BREVIBLOC' have been shown to correlate with extent of beta blockade Altef
`termination oi infusion. substantial recovery from beta blockade‘is observed in lit-20 minutes
`In human'electrophysiology studies. BREVIBLOC' produced elfccts typical of a beta blocker: a decrease in the
`heart rate, increase in sinus cycle length. prolongation ol the sinus node remvery lime. prolongation of the AH inier~
`val during normal sinus rhythm and during atrial pacing. and an increase in antegrade Wenckebach cycle length.
`in patients undergoing radionuclide angiography. BREVIBLOCO, at dosages at 200 mcglkglmin.
`reduced reduc-
`tions inheart rate. systolic blood pressure. rate pressure product. tell and right ventricular ejection raction and ar-
`diac index at rest, which were similar in magnitude to those produced by intravenous propranolol (4 mg). During ex-
`ercise. BHEVIBLDC° produced reductions. in bean rate. rate pressure product and cardiac index which were also
`similarto those produced by propraiioloi. but produced a significantly larger fall in systolic blood pressure. in pa-
`tients undergoing cardiac catheterizatio‘n. the maximum therapeutic ””5.” or soc llluylhglillln ul oncvrnuoc- plu-
`duwd similar effects. and, in addition. there were small. clinicallylnsignilimni. increases In the left ventricular and
`diastolic pressure and
`lmonary capillary wedge pressure. At thirty minutes alter the discontinuation of
`BREVIBLOC' iniusion. al of the hemddynamic parameters had returned to pretreatment levels.

`The relative cardloseiectivity cl BREViBLOC‘ was demonstrated in 10 mildly asthmatic patients._lnlusions oi
`BREVIBLQC' (100. 200 and 300 mcglkglmin) produced no significant increases in specific airway resistance com-
`pared to placebo. At 300 mcglkglmin. BHEVlELOC° produced slightly enhanced bronchomotor sensmvity to dry air
`stimulus. These eflects were not clinically significant. and BHEVlBLOC' was well tolerated by all patients. Six oi
`the patients also received intravenous propranoicl. and at a dosage of 1 mg. two experienced significant. symp-
`toinatic bronchospasm Tequ'fino bronchodjiator treatment. One other propranolol-treated patient also experienced
`dry air-induced bronchospasm. No adverse pulmonary effects were observed in patients with coco who received
`therapeutic dosages'oi BREVIBLOC' tor treatment at supmventn'cular tachycardia l5t patients) or in periolleraiive
`settings (32 patients).
`
`

`

`"MM
`
`given with wartarin. but thisIs not likelyto bpctinlcallyimportant
`Whemd'gexinnew (esmoiol HGT) Were concomitantlyadministere‘d intravenously tonormal volunteers.
`ere wasa 10-20%"Increase l digoxin blood levels at some tir'ne points. Digoxin did not ailect BREVIBLOG' phar-
`acokingltlsjmmitfiveno morphine and BREVIBLOC' were concornllantly administeredIn normal subjects.
`ellect'on”morphine load I
`Is was seen. but BREVIBLOG‘| steady;-state blood levels were increased by 46%In
`mamesence ol morEhine. Ifloo er pharmaeokinetic parameters were changed.
`_on the duration oi succinyichoiine-induced neuromuscularbiockade was studiedIn pa-
`tgg‘tfi‘under oibg sfii.‘ éry. The onset oi neuromuscular blockade by:sucéinylcholine was unaiiected by
`BLOC“ but thedu dtion oi neuromuscular blockade was prolonged irorn 5minutes t08 minutes.
`Although the interactions observed in these studies do not appear to be oi major clinical impedance. BREVIBLOC'
`wa ar n.
`shorriildl be titrated with caution in patients being treated concurrently with digoxin. morphine, succinylchoiine or
`carotene-Isle. flute eeealc. lrepllrmeltcircrtjtlly
`Because oi its short erm usage no carcinogenicity. mutagenicity or reproductive periormance studies have been
`conducted with BREVlBLOC'.
`
`Pregnancyballoon t:
`. Teratogenicity studies in rats at intravenom dosages oi BREVIBLOC. up to 3000 moglkglmin (ten times the maxi-
`mum human maintenance dosage) Ior 30 minutes daily produced no evidence ol maternal toxicity. embryotoxicity
`or teratogenicity. while a dosage oi to.000 mcg/kg/min produced maternal toxicity and lethality. In rabbits. intrave-
`nous dosages up to 1000 mcglkg/min tor 30 minutes daily produced no evidence of maternal toxicity, embryotoxlci-
`ty or teratogeniclty. white 2500 mcg/Irglmin produced minimal maternal toxicity and increased total resorptions
`There are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women. BREVIBLOC' should be used during
`pregnancy only It the potential beneiit Iustiiies the potential risk to the lotus.
`lurclcn Nether:
`it is not known whether BREVIBLOC' is excreted in human milk however. caution should be exercised when
`BREVIBLDC° Is administered to a nursing woman.
`Pediatric lies
`The safety and eliectivenesc oi BREVIBLOC'In children have not been established.
`ADVERSE BEAETIOIS
`. Supnveelrlccler Techycerlle
`The lollowlng adverse"reaction rates are based on use at BREVIBLOC° tesmolol HGI] In almost 400 clinical trial pa-
`tients with supraventricular tachycardia In addition. over 600 patients have been' exposed in clinical studies oI
`other conditions. The most important adverse‘ eliecl has been hypotension (see Warnings). Most adverse ellects
`have been mild and transient.
`terrllrrllcellr - Symptomatic hypotension (diaphoresis. di'zziness) occurred in 12% oi patients.- and therapy was
`discontinued'In about “99 about hall oi whom were.symptomatic. Asymptomatic hypotension occurredIn about
`25% oi patients Hypotension resolved during BHEVIBLOC' lniusionIn 63% oi these patients and within 30 minutes
`alter discontinuation oi iniusion'In 80% at the remaining patients. Diaphoresis accompanied hypotenslon In 10% of
`patients Peripheral ischemia occurred in approximately 1% ol patients. Pallor. ilushing. bradycardla (heart rate
`ess than 50 beats per minute1.chesl pain. syncope. pulmonary edema and heart block have each been reported'In
`less than 1% ol patients. in two patients without supraventricular tachycardia but with serious coronary artery dis-
`ease (post interior myocardial inlarction or unstable angina). severe bradycardialslnus pause/asystole has devel-
`oped rcversible‘In both cases with discontinuation oi treatment.
`
`
`
`central llenrm Sate-I—— Dizziness has occurred'In 3% oi patients; somnolenceIn 3%. contusion headache. and agi-
`tattonIn about 2
`and iatigueIn about 1% oi patients. Paresthesia. asthenia. depression. abnormal thinking. anxi-
`ety. anorexia. and lightheadedness were reported‘In less than 1% ol patients One briel (30 second) episode oi grand
`mal seizure has been reported.
`Iceplnlery -— Bronchospasm. wheezing. dyspnea. nasal congestion. rhanchi. and rates have each been reported in
`tea than 1% at patients.
`intrcletcrtlnl - Nausea was reported In 7% oi patients Vomiting has occurred In about 1% at patients. Dyspepsia.
`constipation. dry mouth. and abdominal discomiort have each occurredIn less than 1% ofpatients. Taste perversion
`has also been'reported.
`Iltle lleirielee Still — lniusion site reactions including inflammation and lndura'lion were reported In about 8% ct pa-
`tierl’etsl1 Edema erytherna. skin discoloration. and burning at the lniusion site have each occurred in iossthan tit oi
`p'at
`ts.
`Miscelltncecc— Each oi the lotiowing has been re'ported'In less than 1% ol patients: urinary retention. speech disor-
`der. abnormal VIslon midscapular pain rigors and- lever.
`OIEIIIIOSAII‘IE
`Acute Toxicity
`.
`A low casas oi massive accidental overdosage oi BREVIBLOC' issmolol HCll have occurreddue to errors in dilution.
`. These intravenous boiusdoses ol BHEVIBLDC‘ oi 5000-6250 mayIkg over 1-2 minutes have produced hypotenslon.
`bradycardia drowsiness and loss or consciousness The etlectshave resolved within to minutes.In some cases
`with administration of a pres'sor agent.
`Because at its approximately 9-minute elimination hall-llle. the first step in the management of toxicity should be
`to discontinue the BREVIBLOC' iniusion. Then. based on the observed clinical etlects. the following general mea-
`sures shouid also be considered:
`lredyeerlle: intravenous administration at atropine or another anticholinergic dIIIg.
`Irceclespu-z Intravenous administration oi a beta2 stimulating agent and/or a theophyttlne derivative.
`terdlrc Flllrrc: intravenous administration oi a diuretic and/or digitalis glycoside. in shock resultingfrom inade-.
`considered.
`quate cardiac contractllity. intravenous administration oi dopamine. dobutamine isoproterenol. or amrlnone may be
`Synptcntle ltypotenlec- intravenous administration oi iiuids and/or pressor agents
`0:81:35,{"10 ADMINISTRATION
`l-iEI 2.59 AMPUL IS NOT FOR DIRECT INTRAVENOUS INJECTION. THIS DOSAGE FORMIS A CONCENTRATED
`Pogfilg)8&ng “magi filUST BE DILETEO PRIOR TO "'8 INFUSION BREVIBLOC' SHOULD NOT BE ADMIXED
`B
`O ATE BREVIB OC' SHOULD NOT BE MIXED WITHOTHER DRUGS PRIOR TO DILUTION IN
`A SUITABLE lNTHAVENOUS FLUID. (See Compatibility Section below.)
`Illlliu: Aseptimlly prepare a 10 mgImL lniusion. by adding two 2.5 g ampuls to a 500 mL container. or one 2.5 g
`ampul to a 250 mL container. at a compatible intravenous solution listed below. (Remove average prior to dilution as
`appropriate). This yields a llnal mncentration oi IO mgImL The diluted solution is stable tor at least 24 hours at
`room temperature. Note: Concentrations oi BREVIBLOC° greater than to mg/mL are likely to produce irritation on
`ra v n
`....— .__.-.' r.--
`footigie'd infusion (see Precautions). BREVIBLOCo has.however, been well tolerated when administeredvia a cen-
`am.— pm ...._..,
`
`2T
`
`;
`
`one not"
`
`riggentrfig.
`
`as q- ....-, s
`on...» h...-.-a-.,.~--c..-..._‘.. .w. “few
`
`

`

`y
`.'
`;
`_
`_
`.
`_
`Supraltaatrlcuiar Tachycardia
`In two multicenter, randomized, double-blind. controlled comparisons oi BREVIBLUC° (Ismaiol ilCll wrth placebo
`and propranoiol. maintenance doses of 50 to 300 mcg/kglmin ol flHEVlBLOC' were found to be more ettective than
`placebo and about as ellective as propr‘anoiol.'3-G mg given by bolus injections. in the trwtment oi supraventricuiar
`tachycardia. principally atrial iihriliation and atrial llulter. The majority at these patients developed their arrhyth-
`mias postoperativeiy. About 60JO‘il ol the patients treated with BREVIBLOG° had a desired therapeutic ellcct
`(either a 20% reduction in heart rate. a decrease in heart rate to less than 100 bpm. or. rarely. conversion to NSRl
`and about 95% at those who responded did so at a dosage at 200 mcg/kglmin or less. The average ellective dosage
`ol BREVIBLOCo was approximately loo-t l5 mcglkglrnin in the two studies. Other mullicenter baseline-controlled
`studies gave essentially similar results in the comparison with propranoloi. about 50% oi patients in both-the
`BREVIBLOCO and propranoloi groups were on concomitant digoxin Response rates were slightly higher with both
`beta-blockers in the digoxio-treoted patients.

`in all studies significant decreases 0! blood pressure occurred in 20-50% at patients. identitied either as adverSe
`reaction reports by investigators. or by observation at 5 static pressure loss than 90 mmHg or diastolic pressure
`less than 50 mmHg. The hypotension was symptomatic gnainly diaphorasis or dizziness) in about 12% ct patients.
`and therapy was discontinued in about 11% ct patients, about hall at whom were symptomatic: in comparison to
`propranoiol. hypotension was about three times as lrequent with BREVIBLOCO, 53% vs. 17%. The hypotension was
`rapidly reversible with decreased inlusion rate or alter discontinuation 'ol therapy with BHEVIBLOC'. For both
`BHEVlBLOC' and propranoiol. hypotension was reported less lreoumlly in patients receiving concomitant digoxin.
`INDIGATIONSANII USAGE
`'
`.
`'
`Sir
`ventricular Tachycardia
`.
`B EVlBLOC' lasmoloi MCI) is indirzted tor the rapid control oi ventricular rate in patients with atrial iibriilatlon or
`atrial flutter in perioperative. postoperative. or other emergent circumstances where short term control at ventricular
`rate with a short-acting agent is desirable. BREVlflLOC‘ is also indicated in noncompensatory sinus tachycardia
`where. in the physician's judgement. the rapid heart rate requires specific intervention. BREVlBLOC' is not intended
`tor use in chronic settings wheretransler to another agent is anticipated.
`'
`.
`conrnanrorcnrtons
`_
`allevtetocn lesmoioi HCl] is contraindicated in patients with sinus bradycardia. heart block greater than lust
`degree, cardiogenic shock or overt heart laiiure (see Wamingsi'.
`MflfllflGS
`llypatanian: In clinical trials 20-50% oi patients treated with BREVIBLOC' (esmolol HCi) have experienced hypoten-
`sron. generally delined as systolic pressure less than 90 mmilg and/or diastolic pressure less than 50 mmHg. About
`12% ot the patients haw been symptomatic (mainly diaphoresis or dizziness). Hypotension can occur at any dose
`but is dose-related so that doses beyond 200 mcg/kglmln are not recommended. Patients should be closely moni-
`tored. especially "pretreatment blood pressure is low. Decrease ot dose or termination of inlusion reverses hypoten-
`slon. usually within 30 minutes
`'
`cardiac Faitara: Sympathetic stimulation is necssary in supporting circulatory lunction in'congestive heart laiiure,
`and beta blockade carries the potential hazard ol lurther depressing myocardial contractility and precipitating more
`severe laiiure. Continued depression at the myocardium with beta blocking agents over a period oi time can. in
`some cases, lead to cardiac laiiure. At the first sign or symptom at impending cardiac laiiure. the dosage should be
`reduced or BHEVIBLOC' should be withdrawn. Although this dosage adjustment or withdrawal may be suilicient
`aoe- -
`'
`.
`because at the short elimination hall-lite at BHEVlBLOG'. specilic treatment may also be considered. (See Overdos-
`lreacirnxpaatie plream: PATiEllT: Willi MillicllltSMSTii: UISEASES Siltltiltl. II GEilElul.
`tilt! RECEIVE IETA
`IltliilEli. Because oi its relative beta. selectivity and titratability. BREVIBLOC' may be used with motion in pa-
`tients with bronchospastic diseases. However. since betal selectivity is not absolute, BliEVlBLOC° should be care-
`luily titrated to obtain the lowest possible eliectivc dose. in the event at bronchospasm. the inlusion should be ter-
`minated immediately; a beta, stimulating agent may beadministered it conditions warrant bul'shouid be 'used with
`particular caution as patients already have rapid ventricular rates.
`liahaln lalillaa .a ll «ulna-la: BREVIBLOC' should be used with caution in diabetic patients requiring a beta
`blocking agent. Beta b ockers may mask tachycardia occurring with hypoglycemia. but other manitestatlons such
`as dizziness and sweating may not be significantly aliected.
`PRECAUTIMIS
`.
`.
`General
`inlusion concentrations oi 20 org/mi, were associated with more venous irritation and thrombophiebitis than con-
`centrations 0110 mglmL. Concentrations greater than 10 mg/mL should, therelore. be avoided.
`.
`7
`.
`Because the acid metabolite oi BHEViBLOC° is primarily excreted unchanged by the kidney. BREVlBLOC' lesmolol
`HCl) should be administered with caution to patients with impaired renal lunction. The elimination hail-tile ol the
`acid metabolite was prolonged ten-laid and the plasma level was considerably elevated in patients with end-stage
`renal disease
`-
`'
`.
`'
`llraa lateractlaaa
`Catecholamlne-depleting drugs, e.g., reserpine. may have an additive ellect when given with beta blocking agents
`Patients treated concurrently with BREVIBLOC‘ and a catechoiamine deptetor should theretore be closely observed
`tor evidenm ol hypotension or marked bradycardia. which may result in vertigo. syncope. or postural hypotenslon.
`A study of interaction between BREViBLOC' and warfarin shower: that concomitant administration at BHEVtBLOC'
`and wartarln does not alter wartarin plasma levels BREVIBLOC‘ concentrations were equivocaliy higher when
`
`.
`
`,_...
`
`t1.)
`
`whit. F“.
`-.W—has“
`
`“‘AIE‘RQ Fl 52 ‘Vw‘fima-W-n-um
`
`”DE! Ea {mane- momma—pg" a .< -..-__.(__._ .-
`
`Ire: {IF ‘ , = ‘2': ‘ "- m- “tWNIFI-H'w-l-wbbqam ..
`
`

`

`
`
`Hmwma-‘wm
`
`..p—ea-I -z:1'.'--o= - _
`
`ifl’n‘ l‘.
`
`Wrrmrtpfiemfiment~
`
`.. __. -_.._..-_.
`.._-. .. ._.-.
`,
`.
`.
`.
`_
`(ofI
`This tfosagle low is prediluted to provide a ready--to'-use I0 trig/ml. concentration recommended tor Brevibioc‘III-
`travenous administration. it may be used to administer the appropriate Brevibioc' loading dosage intusions by
`hand—held syringe while the maintenance inlusion'Is being prepared.
`Soprattantrlciiar tachycardia
`In the treatment ot supraventricular tachycardia responses to BREVIBLOC' usually (over 9596) occur within the
`range ol 50 to 200 mcglkglrnin. The average ellective dosage'Is approximately 100 mcg/kglmin although dosages
`as low as 25 moglkg/min have been adequatell_l some patients. Dosages as high as 300 mcg/lrglmin have been
`used. but those provide ltttie added eltect and 'an increased rate oi adverse 'eItects. and are not recommended.
`Dosage ct BREVIBLOCoIn supraventricular tachycardia must be individualized by titration .in which each step _con-
`. sisls at a loading dosage Iollowed by a maintenance dosage.
`To initiate treatment at a patient with supraventricular tachycardia. administer a loading dosage iniusion at 500
`mcglkglmin oi BREVIBLIJIID tor one minute lollowed by a 4 min maintenance iniusion III 50 mcglkglmin. ll an ade-
`quate therapeutic ellectIS not observed within live minutes repeat the same loading dosage and Iolicw with a main-
`tenance iniusion increased to 100 mcglkglmin.
`Continue titration procedure as above. repeating loading iniusion I500 mcglkglmin Iar I minute}. increasing main-
`tenance iniusion by increments at 50 mcg/Irg/ min tier 4 minutes). As the desired heart rate or a saiety end-point
`(one lowered blood pressurel is approached omit the loading iniusion and reduce incremental doseIn maintenance
`iniusion from 50 mcglkglmin to 25 mcg/kglmin or lower. Also. it daired. increase interval between titration steps
`Iran 5 to lo minutes.
`
`This specific dosage regimen has not been studied intraoperaliveiy and. because at the time required tor titration.
`may not be optimal Ior intraoperative use.
`Maintenance dosages above 200 mcg/kglmin have not been shown to have signlticantiy increased benelits. and the
`saiety ot dosages above 300 mcglkglmin has not been studied.
`In the event oi an adverse reaction, the dosage ol BREVIBLDCO may be reduced or discontinued. It a local iniusion
`site reaction develops. an alternative lnlusion site should be used. The use at butteriiy needles should be avoided.
`Abrupt cessation of BREVIBLOC°In patients has not been reported to produce the withdrawal ellects which may
`occur with abrupt withdrawal ol beta blockers Iotiowing chronic use in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. How-
`ever, caution should still be used‘in abruptly discontinuing inlusions ol BREVIBLOC' in CAD patients.
`Alter achieving an adequate control ot the heart rate and a stable clinical slattis in patients with supra‘ventricuiar
`tachycardia. transition to alternative antiarrhythmic agents such as propranotol. digoxin. or verapamil may beac-
`comptished. A recommended guideline tor such a transitionIs given below but the physician should caretulty con—
`sider the labeling instructions tor the alternative agentselected.
`.
`.
`Alternative mat
`bum
`,
`,
`Propranolol hydrochloride
`10-20 mg o 4-6 h
`Digcxin _
`0.125415 mg q 6 h (pp. or l.v.)
`Verapamil
`80 mg q 6h
`The dosage ot BREVIBLDC' should be reduced as lollows:
`I. Thin woules tollowing the Iirst dose oI the alternative agent. reduce the inltslon rate'of BREVIBLDC' by one-
`hall 5
`2. Following the second dose at the alternative agent. mmitor the patient's response and iI satislactory control ls
`maintained tor the tirst hour. discontinue BREVIBLDC'
`
`.
`
`The use at intusions ct BHEVIBLOCO up to 24 hours has been well documented. in addition. limited data trom 24-48
`hrs IN=4B) indiwte that BREVIBLDC'P'Is'Well tolerated up to 48 hours.
`.
`burg/alimllyly'litl curl-III Ila-d lanai-aorta Hulda
`'
`IBLDC' (amulet HCI
`iNJECTlON was tested tor compatibility with ten commonly used intravenous fluid; at
`a linal concentration at 10 mg osmoiot _HCI per mL BREVIBLDCO INJECTION was lound to be compatible with' the
`toilowing solutions and was stable Ior at least 24 hours at controlled room temperatureor under refrigeration '
`Dextrose (5%) Injection. USP
`-
`Dextrose (550'In Lactated Hinger'5 injection
`Dextrose (590'In Ringer's in action
`Dextrose (5%) and Sodium hloride (O.45%) Injection. USP
`Dextrose (5%) and Sodium Chloride (I1.990- lnjection. USP
`Lac'lated Ringer's in ectidn USP
`"
`Potassium Chloride 40 mEeither) In Dextrose (5%) Injection USP
`Sodium Chloride I0.45%) Injection. USP
`Sodium Chloride (0.9%) iniection. USP
`'
`BREVIBLDC' INJECTION was NOT compatible with Sodium Bicarbonate (5%) Injection. USP.
`Itato: Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually Ior particulate matter and discoloration prior to admin-
`lstration. whenever solution and container permit.
`HOW Slll'Pll in
`N00 0094—0015-7t100 mg —- 10 mL vial. Box at 20
`Not: 0094-0025-13. 25 g -— to mLamput. Box at 10
`STORE AT CONTROLLED ROOM TEMPERATURE (ST-86F I5‘-3011). Freezing does not adversely allect the prod-
`uct. but exposure to elevated temperature: should be avoided.
`Ilu Punt Pharmaceuticals
`E. l du Pontda Nemours and Company
`Vinirnlngton.0elaware19898
`-----
`Date: May.1988
`‘
`
`_
`. M3049.
`
`.
`
`

`

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`
`'
`
`RESEARCH
`
`'
`
`APPLICA TI0N NUMBER:
`
`19-386/8001 and 8002
`
`MEDICAL REVIEW
`
`

`

`DIVISIO

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket