`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
` AT CLARKSBURG
`
`MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`C.A. No. 1:19-cv-101 (IMK)
`
`v.
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (“Merck”) and Defendant Mylan Pharmaceuticals
`
`Inc. (“Mylan”) hereby STIPULATE, and request that the Court ORDER, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`With respect to Mylan’s ANDA Nos. 202473 and 202478, for purposes of
`
`this action, Mylan stipulates to infringement of claims 1, 2, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 7,326,708
`
`(“the ’708 patent”), provided that the claim at issue remains asserted at trial and is not proven
`
`invalid at trial;
`
`2.
`
`Nothing in this stipulation precludes Mylan from pursuing any other
`
`defenses, including contesting the validity of any of claims 1, 2, or 19 of the ’708 patent;
`
`3.
`
`With respect to Mylan’s ANDA Nos. 202473 and 202478, for purposes of
`
`this action, Plaintiff will not assert infringement of claims 4-18 or 20-24 of the ’708 patent;
`
`4.
`
`The parties make this stipulation without prejudice to or waiver of their
`
`rights on any appeal of any judgment of this Court, except with respect to the matters of
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00101-IMK Document 152 Filed 12/10/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 9077
`
`infringement as stipulated herein. The parties also make this stipulation without prejudice to or
`
`waiver of their rights with respect to IPR2020-00040 and any appeal thereof;
`
`5.
`
`This stipulation cannot be used for any other proceeding or for any other
`
`purpose except as expressly stipulated herein, including to argue that any other patent claims are
`
`infringed.
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC
`
`/s/ Gordon H. Copland
`Gordon H. Copland (WV Bar #828)
`William J. O’Brien (WV Bar #10549)
`400 White Oaks Blvd.
`Bridgeport, WV 26330
`(304) 933-8000
`gordon.copland@steptoe-johnson.com
`william.obrien@steptoe-johnson.com
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Deepro R. Mukerjee (admitted PHV)
`Lance A. Soderstrom (admitted PHV)
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN
`575 Madison Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 940-8800
`deepro.mukerjee@kattenlaw.com
`lance.soderstrom@kattenlaw.com
`Jitendra Malik (admitted PHV)
`Joseph M. Janusz (admitted PHV)
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN
`550 S. Tryon Street
`Suite 2900
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`(704) 344-3182
`alissa.pacchioli@kattentlaw.com
`jitty.malik@kattenlaw.com
`joe.janusz@kattenlaw.com
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
`
`Dated: December 10, 2021
`
`CAREY, DOUGLAS, KESSLER & RUBY, PLLC
`
`/s/ Steven R. Ruby
`Michael W. Carey (WVSB # 635)
`Steven R. Ruby (WVSB #10752)
`901 Chase Tower, 707 Virginia Street, East
`P.O. Box 913
`Charleston, WV 25323
`Telephone: (304) 345-1234
`Facsimile: (304) 342-1105
`sruby@cdkrlaw.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Bruce R. Genderson (admitted PHV)
`Jessamyn S. Berniker (admitted PHV)
`Stanley E. Fisher (admitted PHV)
`Alexander S. Zolan (admitted PHV)
`Shaun P. Mahaffy(admitted PHV)
`Anthony H. Sheh (admitted PHV)
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: (202) 434-5000
`F: (202) 434-5029
`bgenderson@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`sfisher@wc.com
`azolan@wc.com
`smahaffy@wc.com
`asheh@wc.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00101-IMK Document 152 Filed 12/10/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 9078
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2021.
`
`____________________________________
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
