throbber
Case: 22-164 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 11/08/2022
`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`In re: APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`______________________
`
`2022-164
`______________________
`
`On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
`District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:21-
`cv-01071-ADA, Judge Alan D. Albright.
`______________________
`
`ON PETITION AND MOTION
`______________________
`
`Before DYK, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
`REYNA, Circuit Judge.
`
`O R D E R
` Apple Inc. petitions this court for a writ of mandamus
`directing the United States District Court for the Western
`District of Texas to vacate its scheduling order, promptly
`rule on Apple’s pending transfer motion, and stay all pro-
`ceedings on the merits until transfer is resolved. Apple
`also moves for this court to stay the district court proceed-
`ings pending resolution of Apple’s petition. Scramoge
`Technology Ltd. opposes the petition and motion but “con-
`sents to the determination of the transfer motion now, with
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case: 22-164 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 11/08/2022
`
`2
`
`
`
`IN RE: APPLE INC.
`
`appropriate sanctions applied to remedy Apple’s obstruc-
`tionist venue discovery misbehavior.” ECF No. 9 at 9.
`
`In another Order issued today, we granted Apple’s pe-
`tition to vacate a similar scheduling order on the ground
`that it was a clear abuse of discretion to force the parties to
`expend additional resources litigating substantive matters,
`until completion of fact discovery, and rebriefing while Ap-
`ple’s motion lingered unnecessarily on the docket particu-
`larly when there were readily available, less time-
`consuming, and more cost-effective means for the court to
`resolve the motion. In re Apple Inc., 2022-162 (Fed. Cir.
`Nov. 8, 2022). We deem it the proper course here to vacate
`the district court’s scheduling order and for the district
`court to reconsider its decision in light of our reasoning in
`No. 2022-162.
`Accordingly,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`
`The petition and motion are granted to the extent that
`
`the district court’s scheduling order is vacated, and the
`case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with
`this Order.
`
`
`
` November 8, 2022
` Date
`
`
`
` FOR THE COURT
`
` /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
` Peter R. Marksteiner
` Clerk of Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket