USCA Case #21-5028 Document #1883688 Filed: 02/04/2021 Page 1 of 2
`Oral Argument Not Yet Scheduled
`No. 21-5028
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the
`District of Columbia CircuitWashington Alliance of Technology Workers,
`United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.,
`On appeal from an order entered in the
`United States District Court for the District of Columbia
`No. 1:16−cv−01170−RBW
`The Hon. Reggie Walton
`Statement of the Issues
`ImmIgratIon reform
`Law InstItute
`Attorneys for Appellants
`25 Massachusetts Ave. N.W.
`Suite 335
`Washington D.C. 20001
`(202) 232-5590


`USCA Case #21-5028 Document #1883688 Filed: 02/04/2021 Page 2 of 2
`1. Whether an alien who is unemployed and has not attended school
`in several years is a bona fide student solely pursuing a course of
`study at an approved academic institution that will report termi-
`nation of attendance.
`2. Whether a district court may consider evidence that is inadmis-
`sible under the Federal Rules of Evidence and supplements the
`record in a review of an agency action when submitted in an
`amicus brief.
`February 4, 2021
`John M. Miano
`D.C. Bar No. 1003068
`Attorney of Record for
`Washington Alliance of
`Technology Workers
`(908) 273-9207
`Christopher Hajec
`D.C. Bar No. 492551
`Dale Wilcox
`D.C. Bar No. 1029412
`Immigration Reform Law Institute
`25 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
`Suite 335
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`(202) 232-5590

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.

Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.


A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.

Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket