`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`PATRICE Y. EVERLY, PHILLIP J.
`EVERLY, CHRISTOPHER EVERLY,
`THE PHILLIP EVERLY FAMILY
`TRUST and EVERLY AND SONS
`MUSIC (BMI),
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 3:17-cv-01440
`Judge Aleta A. Trauger
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`NASHVILLE DIVISION
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, setting forth the court’s
`
`findings of fact and conclusions of law following a bench trial, the court hereby DECLARES as
`
`follows:
`
`
`
`1. Don Everly expressly repudiated Phil Everly’s authorship of “Cathy’s Clown” prior to
`
`June 1980 and more than three years before the defendants filed their Counterclaim, as a result of
`
`which the Counterclaim is time-barred, and the defendants are legally estopped from claiming that
`
`Phil Everly was a co-author of “Cathy’s Clown.”
`
`
`
`2. Because the defendants cannot, as a matter of law, establish that they are the statutory
`
`successors of an author of “Cathy’s Clown,” they are estopped from claiming or exercising rights
`
`granted to an author and the statutory successors of an author of “Cathy’s Clown,” a copyrighted
`
`work, including the right to terminate a grant of copyright, the right to register any rights in
`
`Case 3:17-cv-01440 Document 104 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2320
`
`
`
`
`“Cathy’s Clown” with BMI, the U.S. Copyright Office, or any other parties, and the right to
`
`2
`
`redirect any moneys derived from “Cathy’s Clown.”
`
`
`
`
`
`3. The 1980 Release is not a grant subject to termination under the Copyright Act.
`
`4. Plaintiff Donald Isaac Everly properly terminated the 1960 Grant by virtue of the 2011
`
`Notice to Sony and is the 100% owner of the U.S. rights of termination with respect to the work
`
`“Cathy’s Clown” and the owner of 100% of the songwriter royalties from “Cathy’s Clown.”
`
`
`
`The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for the plaintiff and to dismiss the
`
`Counterclaim in its entirety, with prejudice.
`
`
`
`This is the final order in this case, for purposes of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`
`ALETA A. TRAUGER
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`Case 3:17-cv-01440 Document 104 Filed 05/04/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2321
`
`