throbber

` Trials@uspto.gov
` 571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 21
`
` Entered: May 15, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`SANDOZ INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PHARMACYCLICS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before, SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`DAVID COTTA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DAVID COTTA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Scheduling Order
`(Paper 9), Sandoz Inc. (“Petitioner”) and Pharmacyclics LLC (“Patent
`Owner”) have each requested an oral hearing for the above-captioned
`proceeding. Paper 19, 1; Paper 20, 1. Petitioner requests that it be given
`forty-five (45) minutes to present its arguments. Paper 20, 1. Patent Owner
`requests that it be given one hour to present its arguments. Paper 19, 1. The
`requests are granted.
`Oral arguments will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern Time on June
`19, 2020 by video. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing,
`and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`If at any time during the proceeding, you encounter technical or other
`difficulties that fundamentally undermine your ability to adequately
`represent your client, please let the panel know immediately, and
`adjustments will be made.1
`To facilitate planning, each party must contact PTAB Hearings at
`(571) 272-9797 five business days prior to the oral hearing date to receive
`video set-up information. As a reminder, all arrangements and the expenses
`involved with appearing by video, such as the selection of the facility to be
`used from which a party will attend by video, must be borne by that party. If
`a video connection cannot be established, the parties will be provided with
`dial-in connection information, and the oral hearing will be conducted
`telephonically.
`
`
`1 For example, if a party is experiencing poor video quality, the Board may
`provide alternate dial-in information.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`
`If one or both parties would prefer to participate in the oral hearing
`telephonically, they should notify PTAB Hearings at the above telephone
`number five business days prior to the hearing to receive dial-in connection
`information.
`Each party will have one hour to present their arguments. Petitioner
`bears the ultimate burden of proof to show that the patent claim is
`unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its
`case regarding the challenged claim. Petitioner may reserve some (but no
`more than half) of its argument time for rebuttal. Patent Owner will then
`respond to Petitioner’s arguments. Patent Owner may reserve time for a
`brief sur-rebuttal. Petitioner may use any time it has reserved for rebuttal to
`respond to Patent Owner’s arguments. Patent Owner may use any time it
`has reserved for sur-rebuttal to respond to Petitioner’s arguments made
`during rebuttal. See Office Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, November
`2019 Edition, 83.2
`The record does not contain information designated as confidential.
`Accordingly, neither party is authorized to disclose confidential information
`during the hearing.
`Demonstrative exhibits used at the oral hearing are aids to oral
`argument and not evidence, and should be clearly marked as such. For
`example, each slide may be marked with the words “DEMONSTRATIVE
`EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer. See Office Consolidated Trial
`Practice Guide, November 2019 Edition, 84. Demonstrative exhibits are not
`evidence sufficient to prove underlying facts, but, rather, serve as visual aids
`to facilitate the presentation of argument at an oral hearing. See Duncan v.
`
`
`2 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`Dep’t of the Air Force, 674 F.3d 1359, 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (discussing the
`nature and proper purpose of demonstrative exhibits). Demonstrative
`exhibits cannot be used to advance arguments or introduce evidence not
`previously presented in the record. See Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC, 884
`F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (noting that the “Board was obligated to
`dismiss [the petitioner’s] untimely argument . . . raised for the first time
`during oral argument”). Instead, demonstrative exhibits must cite to
`evidence in the record.
`The parties are directed to serve demonstrative exhibits on opposing
`counsel at least five (5) business days before the hearing date. The parties
`shall also provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the
`Board at least three (3) business days prior to the hearing by emailing them
`to PTABHearings@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file demonstrative
`exhibits in the record of these proceedings.
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstrative
`exhibits with the Board at least three (3) business days before the hearing.
`Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
` The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`by video at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument as long as that counsel is present by video.
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`related to appearing at a video oral hearing, such as a request to
`accommodate visual or hearing impairments, and indicate how the PTAB
`may accommodate the special request. Any special requests must be
`presented in a separate communication not less than five (5) days before the
`hearing.
`Please unmute yourself only when speaking. The panel will have
`access to all papers filed with the Board, including demonstratives. During
`the oral hearing, the parties are advised to identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative referenced (e.g., by slide or screen number) to ensure the
`clarity and accuracy of the court reporter’s transcript. In addition, the parties
`are advised to identify themselves each time they speak. Furthermore, the
`remote nature of the oral hearing may also result in an audio lag, and so the
`parties are advised to observe a pause prior to speaking, so as to avoid
`speaking over others.
`Members of the public may request to listen in on this oral hearing. If
`resources are available, the Board generally expects to grant such requests.
`If either party objects to the Board granting such requests, for example,
`because confidential information may be discussed, the party must notify the
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`Board by contacting PTABHearings@uspto.gov at least five business days
`prior to the oral hearing date.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that oral argument will commence at 9:00 AM Eastern
`Time on June 19, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00865
`Patent 9,795,604 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`Kirk T. Bradley
`Siraj M. Abhyankar
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`kirk.bradley@alston.com
`shri.abhyankar@alston.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`William B. Raich
`Erin M. Sommers
`Cora R. Holt
`Stefan O. Ochiana
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`william.raich@finnegan.com
`erin.sommers@finnegan.com
`cora.holt@finnegan.com
`stefan.ochiana@finnegan.com
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket