throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`Paper No. 5
`Entered: August 26, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477
`_______________
`
`Before GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, KEVIN W. CHERRY, and
`KAMRAN JIVANI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BRADEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Motion for Joinder
`35 U.S.C § 314; 35 U.S.C § 315(c); 37 C.F.R. § 42.122(b)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`
`I.
`INTRODUCTION
`Petitioner, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, filed a Petition
`(Paper 1, “Pet.”) requesting inter partes review of claims 1–6, 9–14, 20–22,
`and 25–27 of U.S. Patent No. 9,769,477 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’477 patent”).
`Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC, did not file a Preliminary Response.
`Petitioner also filed a Motion for Joinder to join as a petitioner in
`IPR2018-01187. Paper 3 (“Mot.”). Petitioner filed the Petition and Motion
`for Joinder on March 4, 2019, within one month after we instituted trial in
`IPR2018-01187.
`As explained further below, we determine institution is warranted on
`the same grounds as instituted in IPR2018-01187 and grant Petitioner’s
`Motion for Joinder.
`
`A. Related Matters
`As required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner identifies various
`judicial or administrative matters that would affect or be affected by a
`decision in this proceeding. Pet. 67.
`
`IPR2018-01187
`B.
`In IPR2018-01187, Netflix, Inc., challenged claims 1–6, 9–14, 20–22,
`and 25–27 of the ’477 patent. After considering the Petition and Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response, we instituted review of the claims
`challenged in that case. Netflix, Inc. v. Reltime Adaptive Streaming LLC,
`Case IPR2018-01187 (PTAB Feb. 4, 2019) (Paper 22, “Netflix Inst.”).
`Thus, the instituted review in IPR2018-01187 involves the following
`grounds of unpatentability:
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`
`References
`
`Imai1
`Pauls
`
`Imai and Pauls2
`
`Imai, Pauls, and Chao3
`
`Basis
`§ 103
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`§ 103
`
`Claims Challenged
`1, 3–5, 12–14
`1, 3–6, 9–14
`
`1, 3–6, 9–14
`
`2, 11, 20–22, 25–27
`
`Netflix Inst. 6–7. Netflix also relied on the Declaration of James A.
`Storer, Ph.D. (“Dr. Storer”) (IPR2018-01187, Ex. 1003). See id.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder states the Petition “challenges the
`same claims” and “asserts only the ground that the board has already
`instituted in the Netflix IPR,” while only relying “on the same exhibits and
`expert declaration” as submitted by Netflix. Mot. 6–7; accord id. (“because
`the invalidity grounds in the petition are identical to those instituted in the
`Netflix IPR, there are no new arguments for [Patent Owner] to address.”).
`Thus, for the same reasons stated in our Decision on Institution in
`IPR2018-01187, we determine institution is warranted here. See generally
`Netflix Inst.
`Having determined that institution is warranted, we consider
`Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder. Section 315(c) provides, in relevant part,
`
`1 Japanese Patent Application Publication No. H11-331305, published Nov.
`30, 1999 (Ex. 1005, “Imai”).
`2 European Patent Application Publication No. EP0905939A2, published
`Mar. 31, 1999 (Ex. 1007, “Pauls”).
`3 International PCT Patent Application Publication No. WO 98/40842,
`published Sept. 17, 1998 (Ex. 1016, “Chao”).
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`that “[i]f more than 1 petition for a post-grant review under this chapter is
`properly filed against the same patent and the Director determines that more
`than 1 of these petitions warrants the institution of a post-grant review under
`section 324, the Director may consolidate such reviews into a single post-
`grant review.” When determining whether to grant a motion for joinder we
`consider factors such as timing and impact of joinder on the trial schedule,
`cost, discovery, and potential simplification of briefing. See Kyocera Corp.
`v. SoftView, LLC, Case IPR2013-00004, slip op. at 4 (PTAB Apr. 24, 2013)
`(Paper 15).
`Under the circumstances of this case, we determine that joinder is
`appropriate. Because the present Petition does not include any issues
`beyond those in the already instituted case, it will have minimal impact on
`the existing case. “Petitioner agrees to assume a limited ‘understudy’ role”
`and “would only take on an active role if Netflix were no longer a party to
`the IPR.” Mot. 8. Because Petitioner relies on the declaration as does
`Netflix, no additional depositions will be required. See id. at 7.
`Under these circumstances, we agree with Petitioner that joinder is
`appropriate and will not unduly impact the ongoing trial in IPR2018-01187.
`We limit Petitioner Comcast Cable Communications, LLC’s participation in
`the joined proceeding, such that (1) Netflix alone is responsible for all
`petitioner filings in the joined proceeding until such time that it is no longer
`an entity in the joined proceeding, and (2) Comcast Cable Communications,
`LLC is bound by all filings by Netflix in the joined proceeding, except for
`(a) filings regarding termination or settlement and (b) filings where Comcast
`Cable Communications, LLC receives permission to file an independent
`paper. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC must obtain prior Board
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`authorization to file any paper or to take any action on its own in the joined
`proceeding, so long as Netflix remains as a non-terminated petitioner in the
`joined proceeding. This arrangement promotes the just and efficient
`administration of the ongoing trial in Case IPR2018-01187and protects the
`interests of Netflix as original petitioner in Case IPR2018-01187, and of
`Patent Owner.
`For the foregoing reasons, and with the limitations discussed above,
`Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder is granted.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that a inter partes review is hereby instituted as to claims
`1–6, 9–14, 20–22, and 25–27 of the ’477 patent on the following asserted
`grounds:
`(1) Claims 1, 3–5, 12–14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
`over Imai;
`(2) Claims 1, 3–6, 9–14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
`over Pauls;
`(3) Claims 1, 3–6, 9–14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
`over Imai and Pauls; and
`(4) Claims 2, 11, 20–22, 25–27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`unpatentable over Imai, Pauls, and Chao;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Joinder with
`IPR2018-01187 is granted, and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC is
`joined as a petitioner in that case pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.122, based on
`the conditions discussed above;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed, pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a);
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order in place for
`IPR2018-01187 (Paper 23) shall govern the joined proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings in the joined proceeding
`shall be made only in IPR2018-01187;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the case caption in IPR2018-01187 for all
`further submissions shall be changed to add Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC Inc. as a named Petitioner after Netflix and to
`indicate by footnote the joinder of IPR2018-01187 to that proceeding, as
`indicated in the attached sample case caption; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Decision shall be entered
`into the record of IPR2018-01187.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`James Day
`Daniel Callaway
`FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
`jday@fbm.com
`dcallaway@fbm.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Shami Messinger PLLC
`1000 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 200
`Washington, DC 20007
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00786
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`
`
`Sample Case Caption
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NETFLIX INC., and
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-011874
`Patent 9,769,477 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`4 Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, which filed a petition in
`IPR2019-00786, has been joined as a party to this proceeding
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket