throbber
VOLUME12
`
`JULY 2006
`
`EDITHDBY
`
`C.A.LEE
`
`SUPPLEMENT 3
`
`CSL1046
`
`C.NLKESSLER
`
`CSL 1046
`
`1/15
`
`

`

`HAEMOPHILIA
`The Official Journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
`Editors
`Christine A. Lee
`Craig M. Kessler
`Her/zopAi/ia Treatment Center and Coaginh/ion Laboratory
`Harman/9mg Cat/me mid Haemattm/J Unit
`Diririm Ly'Hemam/ygr/ Onto/0g]!
`ngl Fm Hot/)zlal
`Pom! fmel
`Cemgetaum [JIIII/flKr/ij', 3800 RermmirRoad
`Lam/mi [VIVJ ZQG, UK
`Nll” lffleJ/JIJIgI‘DIA DC 20057-2797, UJA
`
`
`Editorial Board
`1.. M. Aledort (Van) York, UM
`L. R. Battistella 81712:]!
`K. Beeton Habit/d. UK
`H. Herntorp [Md/”l0, Sit/eds”
`M. van den Berg Ulm'bt, The Neffitl'jflfll’l'
`I). Brettler Warrerter, UXA
`S. A. Brown Brit/7am, Aloha/ta
`A. Chuansumrit Baa/em, Tani/mid
`P. Collins Can/{fl UK
`D. DiMichele New York, USA
`A. B. Federici Ali/ml, [my
`P. L. F. Giangrandc Oafnrd, UK
`N. Goddard Lam/m, UK
`C. R. l\/l. Hay ilianrlimcr. UK
`L. Heijnen Hhizm, {/13 Netherlands
`M. Hcim Tel/1111a, [:rne/
`K. Hoots Harmon UXA
`J. Ingerslev Ca/mzhngm, Denmark
`R. Lassila Helm/ex) Fin/am!
`R. C. R. Liung (Ma/1110, fiver/ell
`
`
`Aims and scope. Haemfizz‘h’a is an international journal dedicated
`to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care
`of haemophilia. The journal contains review articles, original
`scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia. All
`material is independently peer-reviewed.
`Subscriptions. Hawmpbifiu is published six times a year (one volume
`per annum)
`in January, March, May, July, September and
`November. Subscription prices for 2006 are: Institutions: Europe
`£506, Overseas £557, North America US$936. Members and
`affiliates of the World Federation of Hemophilia: £112 (Europe),
`£124 (Overseas), US$208 (USA). Subscribers in Canada must add
`7% to the subscription price, to allow for GST. Subscribers in
`Europe must quote their VAT registration number or state that
`they are not registered. Subscribers in Europe who are not
`VAT-registered must add VAT at 5%. Orders
`for current
`subscriptions and back issues
`should he
`sent
`to Blackwell
`Publishing Ltd, Journal Customer Services, PO Box 1354, 9600
`Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK. Tel. +44 (0) 1865
`778315; email: customerservices®oxon.blackwellpublishingcom
`Business
`correspondence. Business
`correspondence,
`including
`orders for offprints and advertising space should be addressed to
`Haemzp/Jifia, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road,
`Oxford, OX4 zoo, UK. ('I el. +44 (0) 1865 776868; fax +44 (0)
`1865 714591).
`Copyright and photocopying. Journal compilation © 2006
`Blackwell Publishing. All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication
`may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any
`means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright
`holder. Authorization to photocopy items for internal and personal
`use is granted by the copyright holder for libraries and other users
`
`—
`
`C. A. Ludlam Edinburgh, UK
`M. Ivlakris .lzld'fif/fl, UK
`U. Martinowitz Te/er/mrzm; Irma]
`R. Miller lamina, UK
`A. Miners Lam/021, UK
`l). Mohanty Mamba; India
`C. G. Negrier 140/1, Fin/Ire
`K, J. Pasi London, UK
`M. V. Ragni PittJ‘lfllfg/J, UKA
`E. (I. Rodriguez Merchan {Wm/1M, @4511
`I. Schari’er Frankfurt, Ger/2mg
`W. Schtamm [limit/J, Gem/my!
`5. Scllulmal‘l J'fami/fon, Cam/Ia
`M. Smith Chrirrr/er/J, NZ
`A. Srivastava l/r/lm, India
`A. Street Melba/071e, Alarm/1a
`P. Vincent Uenkins Dublin, [yr/mid
`G. C. White Winona”, USA
`J. T. Wilde [fining/Jaw, UK
`A. Yoshioka [Git/117mm CID; Ming/(1pm!
`
`
`local Reproduction Rights Organisation
`registered with their
`(RRO), e.g. Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood
`Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA (www.copyright.com), provided
`the appropriate fee is paid directly to the RRO. This consent does
`not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general
`distribution, for advertising and promotional purposes, for creating
`new collective works or for resale. Special requests should be
`addressed to Blackwell Publishing at:
`jour‘nalstights@oxon.
`blackwellpublishing.eom.
`
`Supplement to IIAEMOPIHLIA. HAEIVIOPHILIA (ISSN 1351-
`8216) is published bimonthly. US mailing agent: G3 worldwide
`(US) Inc, 8701 Bellanca Ave., Los Angeles, CA90045. Periodical
`postage paid at Los Angeles, CA. POSTMASTER: Send all address
`changes to HAEMOPHILIA, Blackwell Publishing Inc., Journals
`Subscription Department, 350 Main St., Malden, MA 021487
`5020.
`
`Paper. The publisher’s policy is to use permanent paper from mills
`that operate a sustainable forestry policy, and which have been
`manufactured from pulp which is processed using acid—free and
`elementary chlorine-free practices. Furthermore,
`the publisher
`ensures that
`the text paper and cover board used has met
`acceptable environmental accreditation standards.
`
`Disclaimer. The Publisher and Editors cannot be held respon—
`sible for errors or any consequences arising from the use OF
`information contained in this journal;
`the views and opinions
`expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Publisher and
`Editors, neither does the publication of advertisements constitute
`any endorsement by the Publisher and Editors of the products
`advertised.
`
`Typeset By SPS (P) Ltd, Chennai, India
`Printed in Singapore by Markono Print Media Pte Ltd
`
`2/15
`
`2/15
`
`

`

`HAEMOPHILIA
`
`VOLUME 12 SUPPLEMENT 3
`
`JULY 2006
`
`Edited by C. A. Lee and C. M. Kessler
`
`State of the Art
`
`XXVII International Congress of the
`World Federation of Hemophilia
`
`Vancouver, Canada, 21—25 May 2006
`
`’
`Guest Editors:
`P. Giangrande and G—E. Rivard
`
`if)...
`
`lllll
`
`
`
`|||lll|||ll lllllllllll
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`llll
`
`PUbl'Shing
`
`1355—0691(200607l12:04~03;1-0
`
`3/15
`
`3/15
`
`

`

`HAEMOPHILIA Volume 12, Supplement 3, July 2006
`
`State of the Art
`XXVII International Congress of the World Federation of Hemophilia
`
`Contents
`
`The Management of Haemophilia
`The pharmacokinetics of coagulation factors
`M. Lee, M. Morfini. C. Negriur and V. Clmmouard
`
`Hacmophilia and ageing
`A. Street, K. Hill. B. Sussex, M. Warner and M.~F. Sadly
`
`The natural evolution of haemophilia care: developing and sustaining comprehensive care globally
`B. 1.. Hyatt
`
`Quality of life assessment in clinical practice in haemophilia treatment
`A. Cringcri, L. Mantuuam' and S. V. Markensen
`
`Ethical Issues
`
`Ethical issues in haemophilia
`D. DiMicbele, A. Ckuansumrit, A. ]. London, A. R. Thompson, C. C. Cooper. R. M. Killian, L. F. Ross, D. Lillicmp and
`]. Kimmelman
`
`Genetic Therapies and Novel Technologies
`Cellular and genetic therapies for haemophilia
`D. Lillicmp, T. VandenDriessche and K. High
`
`Strategies towards a longer acting fatter VIII
`E. L. Saw/20 and S. W. Pipe
`
`Inhibitors
`
`Why do inhibitors develop? Principles of and factors influencing the risk for inhibitor development in haemophilia
`j. Astermar/e
`
`Laboratory Aspects of Haemophilia Therapy
`Achieving and maintaining quality in the laboratory
`M. S. l'iertzberg, j. Mam/nan, A. McCraul. S. C. Nair and A. Sriuustaua
`
`Laboratory issues in bleeding disorders
`D. Lillicrap, S. C. Nair, A. Srivastuuu. F. Rodeghz'era. I. Pabinger and A. B. Federicx'
`
`New approaches for measuring coagulation
`T. W. Barrtlwclifftr, M. Calumet), G. M. Podda, P. Bucctarelli, F. Lussana, A. Lea/ii, C. H. Tab, H. C. Hemker, S. Bégm'n,
`]. Ingerslev and B. Sarensen
`
`Genetic diagnosis of haemophilia and other inherited bleeding disorders
`F. I’eyuandi, G. jayaud/mmn. M. (.‘Imndy, A. Sriuastaua. S. M. Naknya, M. j. lolmson. A. R. Thompson, A. Gouda/e,
`I. Camgiola, S. Lauaretano, M. Menegatti, R. Palla. M. Spreafiw, I... firgi‘t‘abue, R. Asse/m. S. Bragg and P. M. Mmmuuci
`
`13
`
`22
`
`30
`
`36
`
`42
`
`52
`
`61
`
`68
`
`76
`
`82
`
`90
`
`Musculoskeletal Aspects of Haemophilia
`HIV and HCV eoinfected haemophilia patients: what are the best options of orthopaedic treatment?
`E. C. Rodriguez-Mercban
`
`4/15
`
`4/15
`
`

`

`102
`
`108
`
`113
`
`117
`
`122
`
`128
`
`137
`
`143
`
`152
`
`159
`
`169
`
`Recent developments in elinimetric instruments
`K. Balaton, P. Kleijn, P. Hilliard, 5. Funk, N. Zourikizm, B.-M. Bergstrom, R. H. H. Engelbert, ]. ]. van der Net,
`M. ]. Manco-jo/mson, P. Petr-inf, M. van den Berg, A. Abad, B. M. Feldman, A. S. Doria, B. Lzmdin, P. M. Poovmoose,
`]. A. john, M. L. Kauitba. S. M. Padankatti, M. Devadurasini. D. Pazani, A. Srivastaua, F. R. Van Genderen and R. Vaclaa/atbz'ti
`
`Physiotherapy following elective orthopaedic procedures
`P. Kleifn, G. Blarney, N. Zourikizm, R. Dalzell and S. Lobet
`
`Total joint replacement in patients with inhibitors
`L. P. Solimmo, O. S. Perfcllo, G. Pasta and E. Santagoslino
`
`Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy
`G. Rooscndaal and F. P. Lafcbcr
`
`Tissue engineering in musculoskeletal problems related to haemophilia
`H. Caviglia
`
`Rare Bleeding Disorders
`Congenital platelet disorders: overview of their mechanisms, diagnostic evaluation and treatment
`C. P. M. Hayward, A. K. Rat) and M. Cattaneo
`
`Rare bleeding disorders
`F. Peymmdi, R. ]. Kaufman, LI. Saligsalm, O. Salomon, P. H. B. Bolton-Maggs, M. Spreafico, M. Menegattz, R. Palla, S. Sibom‘
`and P. M. Marmucci
`
`Women and Bleeding Disorders
`Current understanding of von Willebrand’s disease in women — some answers, more questions
`P. A. Kouide‘s
`
`Von Willehrund‘s disease: clinical management
`A. B. Federici, G. Castaman, A. Thompson and E. Berntorp
`
`Prophylaxis
`Prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal disease in the hemophilia population: role of prophylaxis and synovectomy
`H. M. van den Berg, A. Dunn, K. Fischer and V. S. Blanchette
`
`World Federation of Hemophilia
`Treatment for all: a vision for the future
`M. W. Skinner
`
`5/15
`
`5/15
`
`

`

`Haemopbi/ia (2006), 12, (Suppl. 5), 42~51
`
`Strategies towards a longer acting factor VIII
`
`\X’. PIPE'i'
`E. L. SAENKO" and S.
`Terrier for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; and
`JrDepartmrmzf of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
`
`improved joint
`Summary. The reduced mortality,
`outcomes and enhanced quality of life, which have
`been witnessed in the developed world for patients
`with haemophilia, have been an outstanding achieve-
`ment. Advancements in biotechnology contributed
`significantly through the development of improved
`pathogen screening, viral inactivation techniques and
`the development of recombinant clotting factors.
`These were partnered with enhanced delivery of care
`through comprehensive haemophilia centres, adop—
`tion of home therapy and most recently effective
`prophylaxis. This came at great costs to govern—
`ments, medical
`insurers and patients’ families.
`In
`addition, barriers persist limiting the adoption and
`adherence of effective prophylactic therapy. Biotech—
`nology has been successful at overcoming similar
`barriers in other disease states. Long-acting biologi—
`
`cal therapeutics are an incremental advance towards
`overcoming some of these barriers. Strategies that
`have been successful for other therapeutic proteins
`are now being applied to factor VIII
`(FVIII) and
`include modifications such as the addition of poly—
`ethylene glycol (PEG) polymers and polysialic acids
`and alternative formulation with PEG—modified lipo-
`somes, In addition, insight into FVIII structure and
`function has allowed targeted modifications of the
`protein to increase the duration of its cofactor
`activity and reduce its clearance in vii/o. The poten—
`tial advantages and disadvantages of these approa-
`ches will be discussed.
`
`factor VIII,
`Keywords: bioengineering, clearance,
`half-life, polyethylene glycol, polysialic acids
`
`Introduction
`
`The last three decades of the recombinant technology
`era witnessed the cloning of the factor VIII (FVIII)
`gene, the development of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII)
`for infusion and furthered the progress towards a
`genetic cure. The resultant
`increased capacity for
`FVIII concentrate production coupled with advances
`in
`haemophilia
`comprehensive
`care,
`pathogen
`screening and viral inactivation technology has led
`to both exciting and sobering observations within the
`developed and developing countries worldwide.
`Within the United States,
`life expectancy is now
`approximately 65 years; serious blood—borne infec—
`tions have not occurred since 1990 and joint disease
`has been eliminated for children under the age of 15
`
`Correspondence: Steven \W. Pipe, MD, Associate Professor of
`Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Hemophilia and Coagu—
`lation Disorders Program, University of
`iVIichigan, LZIIO
`\Women’s Hospital, 1500 E., Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor,
`MI 4s109, usA.
`Tel.: +1-734-647-2893; fax: +1-734-936-7083;
`eemail: ummdswpflbmed.umichedu
`
`42
`
`[1]. Home treatment and early initiation of prophye
`laxis have been the most significant advances to
`impact on joint disease prevention and quality of life
`[2]. This has of course come at great economic cost.
`The average cost of the treatment for a person with
`haemophilia in the United States
`in 2001 was
`$139 000, 72% of which was due to costs for factor
`concentrates [3]. This cost is not dissimilar to those
`for patients in the developed countries with social-
`ized national health care systems such as the United
`Kingdom, Australia or Germany [4]. These kinds of
`costs are an insurmountable barrier
`for
`similar
`
`treatment in many developing countries. Although
`prophylaxis treatment strategies vary greatly,
`the
`typical regimen requires FVIII infused at a dose of
`20—40 IU kg’l
`three times per week. Despite the
`improved musculoskeletal outcomes and quality of
`life, enthusiasm for prophylaxis is hampered by
`suboptimal adherence to therapy [5] and frequent
`need for the placement of central venous access
`devices (CVAD) [6].
`While we wait on an ultimate genetic cure, perhaps
`through gene
`therapy,
`the question is whether
`innovations
`in
`drug
`delivery
`or
`recombinant
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`6/15
`
`6/15
`
`

`

`technology will be able to overcome these barriers
`(cost, compliance, need for CVAD)
`to continued
`effective prophylaxis. Certainly, the development of
`clotting factor delivery systems that did not rely on
`needle and syringe would be a major breakthrough,
`but even strategies to extend the functional half—life
`of FVIII could have a significant impact. There have
`been considerable advances in biological therapy in
`recent years in other disease states that have included
`nonvinvasive methods of delivering proteins and
`increasing their biological half—life. This review will
`explore successful strategies for other therapeutic
`proteins, the advantages and disadvantages of such
`strategies as applied to rFVlll delivery as well as new
`innovations in rFVIlI therapy towards a longer acting
`FVIII protein.
`
`Polyethylene glycol conjugation
`
`in vivo factors can reduce the efficacy of
`Several
`biological
`therapeutic agents. These include poor
`solubility at physiological pH, neutralization by host
`antibodies, rapid renal clearance, cellular clearance
`and proteolysis [7]. Modification of proteins through
`conjugation with polyethylene glycol
`(PEG) poly
`mers, or PEGylation, has been a successful strategy
`to overcome some of these efficacy limitations. PEG
`polymers are amphiphilic, non—toxic and immuno—
`logically inert. They consist of ethylene oxide
`subunits linked in a chain with a hydroxyl group at
`each terminal and may be linear
`(5—30 kDa) or
`branched (40—60 kDa)
`through connections pro-
`duced by chemical linkers [7]. PEGylation was first
`described in the 1970s [8,9] and has resulted recently
`in several commercialized therapeutics. These modi—
`fied biologics can have better efficacy, provided the
`parent protein’s biological activity is retained.
`Polyethylene glycol polymers incorporate many
`water molecules within their hydrophilic structure,
`so that their volume is disproportionately larger than
`that predicted by their molecular weight
`[10].
`PEGylation increases the resultant size of the conju—
`gated therapeutic protein abovc the limit for kidney
`filtration, thereby extending the circulating half-life
`[7]. The hydrated PEG chains are also highly mobile
`in aqueous medium potentially shielding antigenic
`determinants on the protein from access to immune-
`mediating cells
`[7]. PEGylation can reduce pro—
`teolysis by proteascs through steric hindrance or
`sitespecific conjugation that eliminates cleavage sites
`[10]. Some proteins are relatively insoluble with a
`tendency to aggregate. PEGylation increases the
`solubility of several proteins making it easier to
`formulate
`for administration [7]. All of
`these
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`LONGER ACTING FACTOR VI“
`
`43
`
`improved features could result in improved efficacy
`in m'uo but may also contribute to greater patient
`adherence by reducing the frequency of administra—
`tion and improving quality of life [7].
`Commercialized PEGylated protein therapeutics
`have included PEG—asparaginase for the treatment
`of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, PEGiadenosine
`deaminase for severe combined immunodeficiency
`disease, PEG-interferon for hepatitis C, PEG—gra-
`nulocyte colony stimulating factor (G7CSF) for che»
`motherapy—induced neutropenia and PEG-growth
`hormone for
`the treatment of acromegaly. The
`PEGylation of GiCSF results in a molecule whose
`mode of elimination is almost entirely neutrophil—
`mediated clearance, thus the drug‘s elimination from
`plasma is dependent on the recovery of the patient’s
`neutrophil count. UnPEGylated interferons require
`dosing three times per week, not too dissimilar from
`prophylactic FVIII administration regimens. PEGy—
`lation of interferon resulted in efficacious dosing
`schedules of once per week [11]. With regard to
`potential reduced immunogenicity from PEGylation,
`one study observed that some children who experi-
`enced anaphylaxis to unmodified asparaginase toler—
`ated the PEGylated version without an allergic
`reaction [12].
`Polyethylene glycolylation of FVIII would seem to
`be a natural progression for the advancement of
`haemophilia
`therapeutics. However,
`there
`are
`important drawbacks to consider with PEGylation
`as well as unique elimination properties for FVIII,
`which may limit this application. The main disad—
`vantage of PEGylated protein formulations is that an
`improved pharmacokinetic profile can be accompani
`ied by decreased specific activity [7]. Cross-linking
`PEG to proteins
`typically involves coupling of
`activated PEG molecules to amino groups of lysine
`or the protein’s aminoterminal group [7,13]. With-
`out
`the ability tO discriminate where the PEG
`polymers conjugate to the protein,
`there may be
`decreased accessibility for key activating proteases or
`other protein—protein interactions integral
`to the
`therapeutic protein’s biological activity. For exam—
`ple, PEGylated winterferon retains only 7% of the
`antiviral activity of the native protein. However,
`in viva, by virtue of
`its dramatically improved
`pharmacokinetics it still shows improved efficacy
`[14]. This degree of reduced biological activity would
`be detrimental to the efficacy of PEGylatcd FVIII for
`several reasons. FVIII is inactive in its native form,
`requiring proteolytic cleavage by thrombin for acti-
`vation and interaction with the phospholipid (PL)
`surface, factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (PX) in order
`to exert its cofactor function. PEGylation, depending
`
`Haemopbilza (2006), 12, (Suppl. 3), 4275]
`
`7/15
`
`7/15
`
`

`

`44 E. L. SAENKO and S. W. PIPE
`
`on the number of PEG conjugates, would potentially
`interfere with all of these macromolecular interac-
`
`tions. Although reduced biological activity could be
`compensated by a dramatic improvement in phar—
`macokinetic properties, this may not be the case for a
`PEGylated form of FVIII. FVIII is already a large
`molecule and is not subject to renal elimination. lts
`plasma half—life
`is already significantly extended
`through its interaction with von W'illebrand factor
`(VWF) in viz/o. Whereas the plasma half-life of FVIII
`in the absence of VWF is N2 h,
`it is ~12 h when
`associated with VWF [15]. PEGylation of FVIII risks
`interfering with VWF—FVIII affinity and actually
`compromising its plasma half—life. Although this may
`in turn be compensated by reduced interaction with
`cellular clearance mechanisms [16],
`in vivo studies
`are required to address this issue. Reduced biological
`activity of a PEGylated FVIII could be tolerated if the
`extended half-life resulted in a sustained biological
`action. However,
`the instability of activated FVIII
`(FVIIIa) may limit its utility in a PEGylated form.
`FVIII (domain structure A1—A2—B—A3-Cl—C2) exists
`in plasma as an inactive heterodimer of a variably
`sized heavy chain (HC, subunits A1~A2~B, ~90—
`200 kDa) and a light chain (LC, subunits A3-C1—C2,
`N80 kDa) associated via a copper (Cu+)—dependent
`interaction between the A1 and A3 subunits [17719].
`Upon activation with thrombin, proteolysis removes
`the B-domain and bisects the HC resulting in an
`FVIIIa heterotrimer
`(subunits A1/A2/A3VC1»C2)
`[20]. However, the EVllla heterotrimer is unstable
`and subject to spontaneous decay of its procoagulant
`activity attributable to firsteorder dissociation of its
`free A2 subunit, which occurs at physiological pH
`[21,22]. This
`type of proteolytic activation and
`inactivation does not occur with other commercial—
`
`ized PEGylated protein therapeutics. Merely improv—
`ing the pharmacokinetics of
`the inactive FVIII
`heterodimer by PEGylation may have limited effect
`on in Uil/O efficacy, if the active form has significantly
`reduced the biological activity secondary to interfer-
`ence by the PEG conjugates as well as the inherent
`instability of FVIII-a.
`Rostin et al. [23] published their experience with
`PEGylation of B»domain—delctcd rFVIII (r-VIH SQ).
`They used several strategies for PEG conjugation.
`Using random PEG coupling at amino groups of
`lysines, they observed a significant decrease in the
`FVIII activity that was proportional to the degree of
`modification but was significant at even low degrees
`of modification; 1 PEG/r—VIII SQ reduced the specific
`activity to 50%. Using a less reactive PEG polymer, a
`larger excess of polymer was required to modify
`the protein. The reduced reactivity is
`thought
`to
`
`Haemopbz/in (2006), 12, (Suppl. 3), 42—51
`
`correlate with higher selectivity for conjugation. This
`resulted in some preservation of the FVIII activity;
`with 3 PEG/reVIH SQ, the specific activity was 50%.
`Finally,
`they adsorbed the FVIII
`to an anionic
`exchange column in order to protect reactive lysines,
`presumably at the acidic regions of FVIII, from PEG
`conjugation. This had been successful in protecting
`the functional sites on target proteins in previous
`studies. This allowed the preservation of 50% of the
`FVIII activity with 4 PEG/r—VHI SQ. Western blot
`analyses
`suggested that modification sites were
`located on both the HC5 and the LCs of FVIII. Their
`studies also suggested that the VWF—binding site was
`disturbed by PEGylation, as only 26—43% of the
`protein content was able to bind to VWF. The in vivo
`consequences of this perturbation on plasma half—life
`were not studied.
`
`The success of PEGylation as a strategy to extend
`the half—life of FVIII may depend on new targeted
`methodologies for conjugation sites of PEG poly-
`mers. These strategies include specifically targeting
`non-essential functional groups on the surface of the
`protein such as free cysteines or oligosaccharides or
`even employing chemical strategies towards site,
`directed PEGylation [24]. One can also employ
`standard l’EGylation while protecting active sites
`with an inhibitor or a substrate specific to the active
`site. This could be possible for FVIII but would
`require protection of multiple key sites; sites for
`thrombin recognition/cleavage, VWF interaction as
`well as interactive sites for FlXa and FX and Pls.
`
`Alternatively, one could employ chromatographic
`separation of isomers of PEGylated FVIII, selecting
`those with the most biological activity for evaluation.
`The B-domain of FVlll would make an attractive
`
`for site»directed selective PEGylation. This
`target
`large domain has a significant role in intracellular
`trafficking of FVIII within the secretion pathway, but
`when deleted FVIII still retains high specific activity
`and is efficacious therapeutically [25]. The B-domain
`does not play a significant role for interaction with
`VWF, FIXa or FX or the PL surface. Therefore,
`PEGylation in this region would be less likely to have
`a negative effect on VWF affinity or biological
`activity. In addition, upon thrombin activation the
`B—domain is ptoteolytically removed. Therefore, any
`potential steric hindrance of active sites by PEG
`would be abrogated after activation. Recent studies
`have demonstrated that
`the Bedomain protein
`sequence can be modified significantly without
`impairing FVIII secretion [26]. Therefore, a strategy
`designed to introduce targeted sites for PEG modi—
`fication (such as introducing cysteines to create thiol—
`reactive sites) has a high likelihood of success. Recent
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`8/15
`
`8/15
`
`

`

`partnerships between technology leaders in targeted
`PEGylation strategies
`(Nektar Therapeutics, San
`Carlos, CA, USA) and manufacturers of
`rFVIII
`(Baxter International, Deertield,
`IL, USA) suggest
`that
`there is ongoing investigation in this area
`towards a novel FVIII product [27],
`There is some concern as to the ultimate clearance
`mechanism for PEG as it is considered non—biode-
`gradable. Although some potential pathways for
`PEG degradation have been described, they appear to
`occur at a low rate and are not considered normal
`detoxification mechanisms [28]. PEG would then end
`up in tissues participating in the uptake of PEGylated
`constructs where it would accumulate intralysoso—
`mally [29]. The potential adverse effects of long—term
`exposure to large amounts of PEG over an extended
`period of time (i.e. lifelong as would be predicted for
`haemophilia applications) are unknown.
`
`LONGER ACTING FACTOR VIII 45
`
`assays) to FVIII formulated in the absence of SSL.
`l’harmacokinetic studies of l’EGLip—PVHI compared
`with standard formulation FVIII in haeinophilic mice
`(exon 16 FVIII knockout) demonstrated similar peak
`recovery after injection. Average half—life, area under
`the curve and mean residence time were 1.5—1.6
`times higher for PEGLip-FVHI compared with the
`free FVIII. Significantly, the haemostatic efficacy of
`PEGLip»FVHI in haemophilia mice was prolonged
`following tail vein injection compared with standard
`formulation FVHI. This new formulation of FVIII is
`
`presently beginning Phase I trials at the University of
`California — Davis Medical Center in Sacramento
`
`and the Children’s Hospital of Orange County in
`California through a partnership between Zilip—
`Pharma (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and Bayer
`Biological Products (Research Triangle Park, NC,
`USA) [34].
`
`PEGylated liposomes
`
`Polysialic acid polymers
`
`Liposomes (lipid vesicles) are capable of encapsula-
`ting drugs either within their aqueous phase or
`within their lipid bilayer and have been utilized in a
`broad range of drug delivery applications
`[30].
`Unfortunately, they are rapidly cleared by phagocytic
`cells of the reticuloendothelial system (RES). By
`incorporating PEGylated lipids onto the liposome
`surface,
`there is reduced RES clearance and pro—
`longed circulation tirne. These modified liposomes
`are referred to as sterically stabilized liposomes (SSL)
`and have been successfully formulated with the
`chemotherapy drug doxorubicin and lL—Z [31,32].
`Doxorubicin formulated with SSL resulted in pro-
`longed circulation time and enhanced accumulation
`of the drug in the malignant exudates of cancer
`patients.
`the disadvantages of
`Acknowledging some of
`direct modification of the FVIII protein by PEGyla—
`tion, formulation of unmodified FVIII with SSI. has
`garnered recent
`interest. Baru er
`a1.
`[33] have
`published their preclinical characterization of a full—
`length rFVHI with SSL. In this formulation strategy,
`SSL were prepared containing distearoylphosphati-
`dylethanolamine (DSPE) conjugated with PEG. They
`report that for this preparation (designated PEGLip—
`FVIII) FVIII is not encapsulated within the intralipo—
`some aqueous phase or inserted into the lipid bilayer
`but rather is associated with the liposomes through
`high—affinity interaction with the PEG-DSPE. Binding
`studies using surface plasmon resonance
`(SPR)
`measurements demonstrated no hindrance to VWF
`
`binding and similar FVIII activity (measured by
`one-stage clotting assays and two—stage chromogenic
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`Polysialic acids (PSA) are considered nature’s ‘stealth’
`technology. PSA are linear polymers of N—acetylneu—
`raminic acid (sialic acid) and are abundantly present
`on the surface of cells and many proteins [29]. PSA
`protect against invading bacteria by interfering with
`host complement activation and phagocytic activity.
`In addition, PSA modulate cell—to—cell
`inhibition,
`reducing the adherence of cancer cells and facilitating
`metastatic migration. Because of this insulating fea—
`ture of PSA, it has been proposed that polysialylation
`of therapeutic molecules could improve their phar—
`macokinetics. The rationale would be
`that
`the
`
`extreme hydrophilicity of the PSA would form a
`‘watery cloud’ around the therapeutic molecule pro—
`tecting it from proteolytic enzymes, clearance recep
`tors and even antibodies. Investigators have used PSA
`based on polysaccharides 0n Escherichia coli that are
`immunologically identical to PSA in the host; thus
`they are non—immunogenic even when conjugated to
`therapeutic proteins [29]. PSA are biodegradable
`giving them an advantage over PEGylation when
`applied to a therapeutic protein that will be delivered
`in large doses and over an extended period of time (as
`would be the case for haemophilia applications).
`Polysialylation has been applied to a wide range of
`therapeutics
`and
`has
`demonstrated
`important
`improvements over the parent molecule. For exam—
`ple, polysialylation of asparaginase protected it from
`proteolytic degradation in the presence of serum
`while its function was preserved [35]. Fully preserved
`function has also been observed for polysialylated
`forms of cab—interferon and insulin even while their
`half-lives in circulation and areas under the curve
`
`Haemopbi/ia (2006), 12, (Suppl. 3), 42—51
`
`9/15
`
`9/15
`
`

`

`46 E. L. SAENKO and S. \V. PIPE
`
`were significantly increased [29]. There is also
`evidence of reduced immunological reactivity for
`polysialylated forms of asparaginase and insulin
`[36,37].
`As applied to FVIII, polysialylation holds promise
`for extending the half-life of FVIII without compro—
`mising its functional activity. It may even reduce the
`immunogenicity of FVIII or protect it from neutral-
`izing antibodies
`in patients with inhibitors.
`It
`remains
`to be demonstrated that polysialylated
`forms of FVlll can retain VWF affinity and still
`be
`effectively activated by
`thrombin. Recently
`announced collaborations between Lipoxen Techno-
`logies (London, UK) and Baxter International is the
`evidence of research interest in this area [27].
`
`Stabilized forms of FVllla
`
`Successful progress has been made in overcoming the
`inherent limitations of FVlll expression and biologi—
`cal function through techniques to improve rFVIII
`biosynthesis and secretion, functional activity, half—
`life and antigenicity/itnmunogenicity [38]. With
`regard to producing a longer acting FVIII molecule,
`FVIII bioengineered for resistance to inactivation
`holds promise.
`is
`(A2/A2/A3—C1-C2)
`The FVIIIa heterotrimer
`unstable and susceptible to proteolytic inactivation
`by activated protein C (APC), FIXa or factor Xa.
`However, studies have also demonstrated that loss of
`procoagulant
`activity after
`thrombin activation
`results from a
`reversible dissociation of
`the A2
`subunit from the heterotrimer and is another factor
`
`limiting the procoagulant activity of FVIIIa in viva.
`In order to address this limitation, an inactivation-
`resistant FVlll
`(1R8) was genetically engineered
`which is not susceptible to the dissociation of the
`A2—domain subunit and proteolytic inactivation by
`APC and therefore has a prolonged cofactor activity
`[39]. In designing IRS, B-domain residues 794—1689
`were deleted and Arg740 was replaced by alanine,
`eliminating the thrombin cleavage sites at Arg740
`and Arg1689. As a result, FVIII activation by
`thrombin occurs via a single cleavage after Arg372.
`This leads to the generation of an FVllIa dimer that
`retains the A2-domain covalently attached to the LC,
`thus preventing its spontaneous dissociation. Addi
`tionally, missense mutations at APC inactivation
`Cleavage sites provided resistance to further proteo-
`lysis of FVIlIa. The specific activity of IRS proved to
`be markedly higher than that of wild-type T‘VIII
`(FVIII WT),
`and significant peak activity was
`retained for hours in vitro, whereas FVIII WT, under
`similar conditions was inactivated by thrombin after
`
`Hartmopbilin (2006), 12, (Suppl. 3), 42751
`
`10 min. The LC ac

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket