throbber
Case: 19-1900 Document: 20 Page: 1 Filed: 07/18/2019
`
`NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`POWER-PACKER NORTH AMERICA, INC., dba
`GITS Manufacturing Co.,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`G.W. LISK COMPANY, INC.,
`Cross-Appellant
`______________________
`
`2019-1900, -1964
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
`02034.
`
`______________________
`
`Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
`BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
`O R D E R
` Power-Packer North America, Inc., d/b/a GITS Manu-
`facturing Co., responds to this court’s show cause order.
`G.W. Lisk Company, Inc. did not respond.
`
`Before the parties filed their notices of appeal and
`cross-appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s fi-
`nal written decision in this case, G.W. Lisk filed a timely
`request for rehearing, which remains pending before the
`
`IPR2017-02034
`Ex. 3001
`
`

`

`Case: 19-1900 Document: 20 Page: 2 Filed: 07/18/2019
`
`2
`
`POWER-PACKER NORTH AMERICA v. G.W. LISK COMPANY, INC.
`
`Board. The United States Patent and Trademark Office’s
`“Notice of Non-Filing of Certified List” states that due to
`the rehearing request, these appeals are premature, and
`the PTO retains jurisdiction over the case.
`We agree. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(A), this court
`has “exclusive jurisdiction . . . of an appeal from a decision
`of . . . the [Board] with respect to [an] . . . inter partes re-
`view under title 35.” “‘We have held that § 1295(a)(4)
`should be read to incorporate a finality requirement.’” In
`re Arunachalam, 824 F.3d 987, 988 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (quot-
`ing Loughlin v. Ling, 684 F.3d 1289, 1292 (Fed. Cir. 2012)).
`It is well settled, as a general matter, that “[t]he timely fil-
`ing of a motion to reconsider renders the underlying order
`nonfinal for purposes of judicial review.” Stone v. INS, 514
`U.S. 386, 392 (1995). Consequently, we do not currently
`have jurisdiction. The parties may appeal the Board’s final
`written decision by filing a timely notice of appeal after the
`Board renders its decision on the rehearing request. See
`37 C.F.R. § 90.3(b)(1) (“A timely request for rehearing will
`reset the time for appeal or civil action to no later than
`sixty-three (63) days after action on the request.”).
`Accordingly,
`IT IS ORDERED THAT:
`(1) The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted.
`(2) The appeals are dismissed.
`(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
`FOR THE COURT
`
`July 18, 2019
` Date
`
`s32
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket