Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 288 Filed 08/26/22 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`In re APPLE INC. SECURITIES
`LITIGATION
`
`
`ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
` & DOWD LLP
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
`DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (248631)
`KENNETH J. BLACK (291871)
`HADIYA K. DESHMUKH (328118)
`Post Montgomery Center
`One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: 415/288-4545
`415/288-4534 (fax)
`shawnw@rgrdlaw.com
`dpfefferbaum@rgrdlaw.com
`kennyb@rgrdlaw.com
`hdeshmukh@rgrdlaw.com
`– and –
`MARK SOLOMON (151949)
`JASON A. FORGE (181542)
`RAPHAELLA FRIEDMAN (323324)
`655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619/231-1058
`619/231-7423 (fax)
`marks@rgrdlaw.com
`jforge@rgrdlaw.com
`rfriedman@rgrdlaw.com
`Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff
`[Additional counsel appear on signature page.]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`)
`Case No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR
`)
`)
`CLASS ACTION
`)
`)
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`)
`REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS
`)
`)
`
`This Document Relates To:
`ALL ACTIONS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`4858-7416-4271.v2
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 288 Filed 08/26/22 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`This Stipulation is entered into between Lead Plaintiff and Class Representative Norfolk
`County Council as Administering Authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund (“Plaintiff”) and
`Defendants Apple Inc., Timothy D. Cook, and Luca Maestri (“Defendants” and collectively, the
`“Parties”) in the above-captioned action, by and through their undersigned counsel.
`WHEREAS, on April 27, 2022, pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) and the Case
`Management Order (ECF 128) (“Case Management Order”), Plaintiff disclosed two expert
`witnesses and their written reports and Defendants disclosed four expert witnesses and their written
`reports;
`WHEREAS, on June 10, 2022, pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) and the Case
`Management Order, Plaintiff disclosed one rebuttal expert witness and his written report and
`Defendants disclosed two additional rebuttal experts, and served a total of five written expert
`rebuttal reports;
`WHEREAS, by June 10, 2022, Plaintiff disclosed three experts, and three expert reports,
`and Defendants disclosed six experts, and nine expert reports;
`WHEREAS, on June 22, 2022, the Court issued an updated Standing Order in Civil Cases
`(“Standing Order”) that limits each party to three Daubert motions throughout the entire case
`absent leave of Court (Standing Order, ¶11);
`WHEREAS, both Parties intend to challenge some or all of the opposing Party’s experts;
`WHEREAS, under the Case Management Order entered by the Court on December 22,
`2020, the last day to file Daubert motions is September 9, 2022;
`WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed, to promote efficiency and
`economy for the both the Court and the Parties, to request that the Court permit each side to file a
`single consolidated Daubert brief of up to 40 pages to challenge the other Party’s experts, as well
`as a consolidated opposition of up to 40 pages and a consolidated reply of up to 20 pages.
`NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed among the undersigned Parties, and
`respectfully submitted for the Court’s approval as follows:
`1.
`Each Party shall present all of its motions to exclude expert testimony as a single
`consolidated Daubert motion, and will also file consolidated opposition and reply briefing;
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS - 4:19-cv-02033-
`YGR
`4858-7416-4271.v2
`
`- 1 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 288 Filed 08/26/22 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`There shall be no limit on the number of experts whose testimony a Party may seek
`
`2.
`to exclude;
`3.
`The consolidated Daubert opening brief may not exceed 40 pages, any opposition
`brief may not exceed 40 pages, and any reply brief may not exceed 20 pages.
`DATED: August 25, 2022
`ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
` & DOWD LLP
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
`DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM
`KENNETH J. BLACK
`HADIYA K. DESHMUKH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Shawn A. Williams
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
`Post Montgomery Center
`One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Telephone: 415/288-4545
`415/288-4534 (fax)
`shawnw@rgrdlaw.com
`dpfefferbaum@rgrdlaw.com
`kennyb@rgrdlaw.com
`hdeshmukh@rgrdlaw.com
`ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
` & DOWD LLP
`MARK SOLOMON
`JASON A. FORGE
`RAPHAELLA FRIEDMAN
`655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619/231-1058
`619/231-7423 (fax)
`marks@rgrdlaw.com
`jforge@rgrdlaw.com
`rfriedman@rgrdlaw.com
`Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiff
`LABATON SUCHAROW
`CAROL C. VILLEGAS
`140 Broadway
`New York, NY 10005
`Telephone: 212/907-0700
`212/883-7524 (fax)
`cvillegas@labaton.com
`Counsel for Employees’ Retirement System of the
`State of Rhode Island
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS - 4:19-cv-02033-
`YGR
`4858-7416-4271.v2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 288 Filed 08/26/22 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`DATED: August 25, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VANOVERBEKE, MICHAUD & TIMMONY,
`P.C.
`THOMAS C. MICHAUD
`79 Alfred Street
`Detroit, MI 48201
`Telephone: 313/578-1200
`313/578-1201 (fax)
`tmichaud@vmtlaw.com
`Additional Counsel
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`
`s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: 415/773-5923
`jkramer@orrick.com
`Attorneys for Defendants Apple Inc., Timothy D.
`Cook, and Luca Maestri
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS - 4:19-cv-02033-
`YGR
`4858-7416-4271.v2
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 288 Filed 08/26/22 Page 5 of 5
`
`ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1
`I, Shawn A. Williams, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
`
`to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS.
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(h)(3) and in compliance with General Order No. 45 X.B., I hereby
`
`attest that James N. Kramer has concurred in this filing.
`
`DATED: August 25, 2022
`
`s/ Shawn A. Williams
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
`
`*
`O R D E R
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`DATED: _________________________
`August 26, 2022
`
`____________________________________
`THE HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DAUBERT MOTIONS - 4:19-cv-02033-
`YGR
`4858-7416-4271.v2
`
`- 4 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`