throbber
Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 243 Filed 04/29/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
`jkramer@orrick.com
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN 268068)
`atalarides@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`(415) 773-5700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 773-5759
`Attorneys for Defendants Apple Inc.,
`Timothy Cook and Luca Maestri
`[additional counsel appears on signature page]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES
`LITIGATION
`
`This Document Relates to:
`ALL ACTIONS.
`
`Case No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR
`CLASS ACTION
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S
`SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR CLASS
`CERTIFICATION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLT’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 243 Filed 04/29/22 Page 2 of 4
`
`This Stipulation is entered into by and among Lead Plaintiff Norfolk County Council as
`Administering Authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund (“Lead Plaintiff”) and Defendants Apple
`Inc. (“Apple”), Timothy Cook, and Luca Maestri (collectively “Defendants” and together with the
`Lead Plaintiff, the “Parties”), through their respective attorneys of record.
`WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021, Lead Plaintiff filed a Motion for Class Certification (the
`“Motion”) [Dkt. No. 165];
`WHEREAS, on February 4, 2022, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying
`in part the Motion (the “Order”) [Dkt. No. 224]. The Order denied without prejudice Lead
`Plaintiff’s Motion with respect to holders of options on Apple stock and contemplated that Lead
`Plaintiff may “re-seek certification with respect to this category of investors”;
`WHEREAS, on March 4, 2022, the Court issued an order setting a deadline of April 15,
`2022 for Lead Plaintiff to supplement its class certification motion regarding holders of options
`on Apple stock [Dkt. No. 231];
`WHEREAS, on April 15, 2022, Lead Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Motion to Certify
`Class of Apple Options Investors (the “Supplemental Motion”) [Dkt. No. 239], which attached,
`among other things, an expert report by Don Chance;
`WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff has agreed to make Professor Chance available for deposition
`on June 8, 2022;
`WHEREAS, it is Defendants’ current intention to file an expert report in connection with
`its opposition to the Supplemental Motion;
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that a deposition of Defendants’ expert may be
`necessary;
`WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and reached an agreement to set a
`briefing schedule for the Supplemental Motion which sets forth sufficient time for all parties to
`take any expert discovery, as set forth below;
`NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed among the undersigned Parties, and
`respectfully submitted for the Court’s approval as follows:
`1.
`Defendants shall file any opposition to the Supplemental Motion no later than June
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLT’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`- 1 -
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 243 Filed 04/29/22 Page 3 of 4
`
`24, 2022;
`Lead Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of the Supplemental Motion no later
`2.
`than August 26, 2022;
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: April 28, 2022
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
`/s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Apple Inc., Timothy Cook and Luca Maestri
`
`Dated: April 28, 2022
`
`ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
`
`/s/ Shawn A. Williams
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
`Counsel for Lead Plaintiff,
`Norfolk County Council as Administering
`Authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund
`
`CIVIL L.R. 5-1 ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, James N. Kramer, am the ECF user whose ID
`and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order regarding Briefing
`Schedule for Lead Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion for Class Certification. In compliance with
`General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Shawn A. Williams has concurred in this filing.
`
`/s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`
`- 2 -
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLT’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 243 Filed 04/29/22 Page 4 of 4
`
`***
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`April 29, 2022
`
`HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`- 3 -
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLT’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket