throbber
Case 3:23-cv-04597-EMC Document 127 Filed 11/06/24 Page 1 of 4
`
`Ashley M. Gjovik, JD
`In Propria Persona
`2108 N St. Ste. 4553
`Sacramento, CA, 95816
`
`(408) 883-4428
`legal@ashleygjovik.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`United States District Court
`
`Northern District of California
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ashley M. Gjovik , an individual,
`
`Case No. 3:23 -CV-04597-EMC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Administrative
`Notice
`
`
`
`Intent to File 5AC on 11/6
`
`
`
`Apple Inc., a corporation,
`
`Confirmation that Ninth
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`Circuit Appeal is Pending
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-04597-EMC Document 127 Filed 11/06/24 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`Notice of Intent to File 5AC on Nov. 6 2024
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff, Ashley Gjovik , respectfully submits the following Administrative
`
`Notice, providing a notice of intent to file her Fifth Amended Complaint, today
`
`on Nov. 6 2024. I apologize for the delay and that I could not file it yesterday.
`
`My revisions have been delayed , following the court’s order last week , due
`
`to my PTSD and anxiety symptoms, which have worsened significantly while
`
`having to remove critical parts of my lawsuit – and those parts represent events in
`
`my life which previously caused me severe emotion distress when they occurred
`
`originally, exacerbating my distress now. I have also suffered from PTSD
`
`symptoms due the requirement of publicly detailing my IIED claims while
`
`concurrently being harassed by the Defendant and certain non-parties about those
`
`events, and in response to me attempting to complain about these event s –
`
`including additional threats of non -specific reprisals.
`
` However, I am tr ying to manage my distress and I am committed to filing
`
`20
`
`the 5AC by midnight PST.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Notice of Status of Appeal
`
`
`
`Defendant has filed an Opposition to Plaintiff ’s Motion to Stay (Dkt . 126)
`
`and in the filing Defendant claimed that the Plaintiff ’s interlocutor y appeal was
`
`dismissed by the Ninth Circuit and is no longer at issue.
`
`P l a in t i ff ’ s No t i c e | C a s e No . 3 : 2 3 - C V- 0 4 5 9 7 - E M C
`
`— 1 —
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-04597-EMC Document 127 Filed 11/06/24 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`Plaintiff confirmed with the Ninth Circuit clerk’s office a week ago that her
`
`Motion for Reconsideration is under review and the court will respond to it. Due
`
`to Defendant’s statements today, Plaintiff also called the Ninth Circuit clerk’s
`
`office again today to reconfirm, and the clerk’s office did confirm that the Motion
`
`to Reconsider is still under review and that the Ninth Circuit will respond to the
`
`Plaintiff/Appellant , in the case docket, when they have made a decision.
`
`Interlocutor y appeals are uncommon and granting motions to reconsider are
`
`also uncommon, however Plaintiff is encouraged the court has been reviewing the
`
`case record for two weeks now, which seems to imply the motion to reconsider was
`
`accepted, though any further outcome is still pending.
`
`Plaintiff also asks once again, that Defendant please cease making personal
`
`attacks on the Plaintiff ’s character and competence, and that Defendant cease
`
`attempting to blame the Plaintiff for problems the Defendant created itself ( ie,
`
`delays due to ser vice dodging, their own requests to delay the filing schedule,
`
`requests to delay the discover y schedule, raising unnecessar y and time -wasting
`
`issues, an excessive number of motions to dismiss and motions to strike , and
`
`repeatedly arguing incorrect law and misrepresenting facts leading to the issues
`
`now pending appeal).
`
`On a related note, it was extremely suspicious that the Ninth Circuit
`
`abruptly dismissed Plaintiff ’s appeal, despite previously docketing it and issuing
`
`a scheduling order, just one day after Apple filed a Motion to Dismiss the appeal
`
`and without any opportunity for Plaintiff to respond to the Motion or with a Brief.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`P l a in t i ff ’ s No t i c e | C a s e No . 3 : 2 3 - C V- 0 4 5 9 7 - E M C
`
`— 2 —
`
`

`

`Case 3:23-cv-04597-EMC Document 127 Filed 11/06/24 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff will file her 5AC by end of the day.
`
`
`
`Thank you.
`
`
`
`Dated: Nov. 6 2024.
`
`Signature:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ashley M. Gjovik
`
`Pro Se Plaintiff
`
`
`Email: legal@ashleygjovik.com
`Physical Address :
`Boston, Massachusetts
`Mailing Address:
`2108 N St. Ste. 4553 Sacramento, CA, 95816
`Phone: (408) 883-4428
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`P l a in t i ff ’ s No t i c e | C a s e No . 3 : 2 3 - C V- 0 4 5 9 7 - E M C
`
`— 3 —
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket