`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`ASHLEY M GJOVIK,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 23-cv-04597-EMC
`
`
`ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
`FOR CLARIFICATION AND
`CORRECTION
`
`
`Docket No. 116
`
`
`
`Plaintiff has filed a motion in which she seeks a clarification and a correction to a hearing
`
`transcript. Defendant has filed a statement of nonopposition. The Court hereby rules as follows.
`
`1.
`
`Absent further order of the Court, Plaintiff may make Zoom appearances for case
`
`management conferences/status conferences.
`
`2.
`
`Absent further order of the Court, Plaintiff may also appear by Zoom for a hearing
`
`on any substantive (i.e., nonadministrative) motion. However, (a) there is the risk that there may
`
`be connectivity or other technical problems which the Court cannot predict and (2) Defendant has
`
`the right to attend in person.
`
`3.
`
`The Court shall not order any correction to the transcript for the hearing on August
`
`28, 2024. This order reflects the Court’s understanding that there were connectivity or other
`
`technical problems with the hybrid (Zoom/in-person) hearing. The Court’s rulings on the motion
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`/ / /
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 3:23-cv-04597-EMC Document 122 Filed 10/25/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`to dismiss which was heard on that day were not impacted or otherwise affected by any
`
`connectivity or other technical problems.
`
`
`
`
`
`This order disposes of Docket No. 116.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 25, 2024
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`
`EDWARD M. CHEN
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
