`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`RELATED CASE ORDER
`
`A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a
`Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been
`filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned
`to cases
`
`4:11-cv-6714-YGR
`In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
`
`4:20-cv-5640-YGR
`Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
`
`I find that the more recently filed case that I have initialed below is related to the cases
`assigned to me, and such case shall be reassigned to me.
`
`Title
`Case
`4:22-cv-4437-HSG Société du Figaro v. Apple, Inc.
`.
`
`Related Not Related
`YGR
`
`ORDER
`
`The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the
`initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management
`conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the
`dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly.
`Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-
`noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local
`Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to
`govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned
`judge.
`
`Dated:
`
`September 2, 2022
`
`By:
`
`United States District Judge
`
`1
`
`