`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Cross-Appellant
`
`HTC CORP., HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`Appellees
`
`ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE
`FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER
`SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF
`THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2020-1306, 2020-1317, 2020-1326
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-
`00424, IPR2018-01028, IPR2018-01631, IPR2018-01653.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`
`
`Case: 20-1306 Document: 93 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2021
`
`
`
`
`JEFFREY A. STEPHENS, Etheridge Law Group, South-
`lake, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES
`ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM.
`
` ELIZABETH MOULTON, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for cross-appellant and ap-
`pellees. Cross-appellant also represented by MELANIE L.
`BOSTWICK, BENJAMIN PAUL CHAGNON, MARK S. DAVIES,
`Washington, DC.
`
` FRED WILLIAMS, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC,
`Austin, TX, for appellees. Also represented by TODD ERIC
`LANDIS, Dallas, TX.
`
` ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States
`Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for interve-
`nor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA
`YASMEEN RASHEED, MOLLY R. SILFEN.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`May 10, 2021
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
