throbber
Sonderdruck
`Reprint
`
`A rz n e i mitt e 1-F ors ch u n g /Drug Research
`ECV • Editio Cantor Verlag · Arzneim.-Forsch./ Drug Res. 42 (II), 12, 1439-1452 (1992)
`
`Structure / Histotoxicity Relationship
`of Parenteral Iron Preparations
`
`P. Geisser, M. Baer, and E. Schaub
`
`Summary
`Commercial iron preparations with different chemical
`structures and stabilities which are indicated for paren(cid:173)
`teral application were analyzed. After intravenous appli(cid:173)
`cation in mice, toxic effects were screened by histological
`examination of liver, kidney, adrenal, lung and spleen.
`The various iron complexes were classified into four
`groups according to their physicochemical properties (mo(cid:173)
`lecular mass, kinetic and thermodynamic stability). It was
`found that the toxic effects can be forecasted by the chem(cid:173)
`ical properties. The results clearly show that not all iron
`preparations tested can be recommended for intravenous
`application. After injection, the ideal iron preparation is
`deposited in the reticulo-endothelial system, and not in
`the parenchyma of the liver, nor mainly in the periportal
`area. Furthermore, its renal elimination rate should be
`below J % of the dose, and there should be practically no
`iron detectable in the tubuli. The molecular mass of an
`optimal product is between 30 000 and 100 000 Dal tons,
`and the preparation does not contain any slowly degrad(cid:173)
`able biopolymers, so that the incidence of allergic side
`effects is reduced to a minimum. Iron preparations con(cid:173)
`sisting only of weak iron complexes, which liberate iron
`ions stochastically, should not be used for intravenous ap(cid:173)
`plication.
`
`Zusammenfassung
`Struktur I Histotoxizitats-Beziehung von parenteralen Ei(cid:173)
`senpraparaten
`
`Handelsiibliche, zur parenteralen Amvendung empfohlene
`Eisenkomplexe mil verschiedenen chemischen Strukturen
`und unterschiedlichen Stabilitaten wurden analysiert und ·
`nach intravendser Gabe an A1ause histologisch auf ihre
`toxischen Wirkungen auf Leber, Niere, Nebenniere,
`Lunge und A1ilz untersucht. Die Eisenkomplexe wurden
`entsprechend ihren chemisch-physikalischen Eigenschaf
`ten (Jvlolmasse, kinetische und thermodynamische Sta(cid:173)
`bilitat) in vier Typen eingeteilt. Dabei stellte sich heraus,
`daj3 aufgrund der chemischen Eigenschaften die toxischen
`Auswirkungen gut vorhergesagt werden kdnnen. Die R e(cid:173)
`sultate zeigen, daj3 nicht a/le untersuchten Eisenpraparate
`zur intravendsen Applikation empfohlen werden kdnnen.
`Ein gutes Praparat wird nach Applikation vonviegend im
`retikuloendothelialen System, und weder im Parenchym
`der Leber noch bevorzugt in der periportalen Zone ge(cid:173)
`speichert. Im weiteren wire/ es renal unter 1 % ausgeschie(cid:173)
`den und lager/ sich nicht in den Tubuli der l'-liere ab. Die
`Molmasse eines optima/en Praparates liegt z wischen
`30 000 und JOO 000 und enthalt keine schlecht abbau(cid:173)
`baren Biopolymere, so daj3 die A1dglichkeit zu al/ergischen
`Reaktionen mdglichst k lein bleibt. Eisenpraparate, die
`nur schwache Eisenkomplexe enthalten und dadurch Ei(cid:173)
`senionen ungezielt freigeben kdnnen, sol/ten nicht intra(cid:173)
`vends verabreicht 1verden.
`
`Key words: Anaemex® • Ferrum Hausmann® · Iron, structurelhistotoxicity relationship of parenteral preparations
`
`1. Introduction
`It is well known that in vi tro incubation of divalent iron
`ions (Fe 2 +) with the protein apoferritin leads to the for(cid:173)
`mation of ferritin in the presence of oxygen or other ox(cid:173)
`idizing agents (Spiro et al. 1969). Within this biochemical
`step highly toxic iron ions are converted into only
`slightly toxic, non-ionic, polynuclear iron(III)-hydroxide,
`
`Hausmann, Laboratories Inc. , R esearch Department,
`St. Gallen (Switzerland)
`
`which becomes water-soluble through ferritin complex
`formation (Islam et al. 1989). The formation ofnon-ionic
`iron(III)-hydroxide complex ferritin allowed to solve tox(cid:173)
`icity, tolerance and safety problems of iron stores in the
`evolution of animals and mammals (Theil et al. 1979).
`This can be demonstrated for instance by evaluating the
`LD 50-values of iron salts and mono- and oligonuclear
`iron complexes on one hand, which have a high toxicity,
`and of the polynuclear ferric hydroxide carbohydrate
`complexes on the other hand, which are of low toxicity
`(Mi.ilJer 1974, Berenbaum et al. 1960, Hoppe et al. 1955)
`(Table I).
`The formation of the physiological iron depot ferritin
`represents a model of the synthesis of different iron prep-
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Table 1: Toxicity of different iron compou nds.
`
`Compound
`
`Salts
`FeS04
`Fe(II)-gluconate
`Fe(Il)-fumarate
`FeCl3
`Mono- and oligonuclear
`complexes
`Fe(IIl)-EDTA
`Fe(IIl)-ammonium-citrate
`Pol ynuclea r complexes
`Ferric hydroxide dex tran
`Ferric hydroxide dextrin
`Ferric hydroxid e sucrose
`
`LD 50 in white mice in mg Fe/kg
`body weight
`
`Oral
`
`Int ravenous
`
`230')
`429 3>
`630')
`500-8403>
`
`11 2>
`I 3'>
`
`18.5 3)
`
`500ll
`IOOO J>
`
`> 2500 1>
`> 2500 1>
`> 2500 1>
`
`40-50 1>
`I 6.5 3>
`
`> 2500 1>
`> 2500 1>
`> 200 1>
`
`References: 1> MUiler 1974, 2> Berenbaum et al. 1960, 3> Hoppe et al. 1955.
`
`arations with extremely low toxicity, good tolerance, a
`wide therapeutical range and a minimal danger of acci(cid:173)
`dental overdosing (Millier 1974).
`Parenteral iron therapy is said to be indicated in the fol(cid:173)
`lowing cases:
`known severe problems of intestinal iron absorption,
`absolute intestinal iron intolerance,
`severe or very severe iron deficiency conditions
`(Hb < 90-100 g/1), where a therapeutical effect must
`be achieved as quickly as possible, as for instance in
`the last trimester bf pregnancy or in pre-operative iron
`deficiency conditions (Hallberg et al. 1970),
`cases where regular intake of an oral preparation is not
`guaranteed,
`iron deficiency where there is no response to oral ther(cid:173)
`apy, e.g. in dialysis patients (Lawson et al. 1971 ),
`situations where iron stores are scarcely or not at all
`formed but would be important for further therapy,
`e.g. in combination with erythropoietin (Van Wyck
`1989).
`In clinical situations where parenteral iron preparations
`are indicated, a high safety margin is of paramount im(cid:173)
`portance. This implies that toxic as well as allergic side
`effects must be avoided.
`Nevertheless, the va riou s iron preparations available on
`the market and used for parenteral application differ
`strongly in crucial parameters. Not all of them belong to
`the safest group of polynuclear iron complexes. As their
`chemical structure is different, a different toxic and his(cid:173)
`tological behavior is observed. This work will demon(cid:173)
`strate, analyze and explain the relationship between the
`chemical structure of iron complexes and their histolog(cid:173)
`ical properties.
`
`2. Material and methods
`2.1. Animals
`ICR (Institute Charles Ri ver) mice of both sexes (our own breed
`with animals from the Animal Breeding Institute, University of
`Zurich, Switzerland) of 20- 24 g (about 4 weeks old) were used
`in all experiments without previous randomization. The animals
`were kept in stainless steel cages with bottom lattice for the pre(cid:173)
`vention of coprophagia. The light-dark interval was 12 h, tem(cid:173)
`perature 22 ·c and humidity 55 %. The animals were fed with a
`standard diet from Nafag, Gossau (Switzerland) (Nr. 850) con(cid:173)
`taining 250 mg Fe/kg, and iron-free tap water, both ad libitum.
`In a test experiment no difference could be found between ane(cid:173)
`mic and non anemic, or between male and female animals, as far
`as the typical characteristics of the histological findings are con(cid:173)
`cerned. The iron preparations were applied intravenously by in(cid:173)
`jection into the tail vein. Usually a solution, diluted with normal
`saline, containing 2 w/v % of iron , was used. The standard dose
`
`2
`
`was 200 mg Fe/kg body weight. (Preparations provoking liver
`necrosis caused apathies and breath troubles after 30 to 60 min,
`and led to death in some cases within 3-48 h post inj ectionem).
`IO min , 4 h, 4 and 14 d after application the animals were sac(cid:173)
`rificed and dissected subsequently. Liver, kidney, adrenal, lung
`and spleen were isolated and placed on a round metal plate and
`fro zen at -12 to -15 ·c for 45 min. Two animals were used for
`each preparation at each check time. A minimum of 2 frozen
`sections of each type of tissue were prepared per animal with a
`microtome cryo-cut (American Optical Company, Buffalo, USA;
`General Representation: Leica AG, Glattbrugg, Switzerland),
`whereby it proved advantageous to let the lungs thaw at -10 to
`-12 ·c. The thickness of the tissue sections was chosen as 4-5
`µm . The following sections were used: liver cross-sections from
`the upper third and from the middle pai;t of the liver from the
`lobuli sinister lateralis and dexter medialis, resp. ; longitudinal
`peripheral kidney cross-sections (cortex and medulla) and
`through the center (cortex - medulla - calix - medulla - cor(cid:173)
`tex); adrenal cross-sections through the middle part; lung cross(cid:173)
`sections through the middle part; longitudinal spleen sections
`through the middle part. The microscope slides were spread with
`a thin layer of albumen-glycerol before use. Two pieces of tissue
`sections of each organ were fi xed on glass slides. After this they
`were colored with Berliner blue and Kernecht-red I aluminium
`sulphate solution ; dehydrated and embedded with Eukitt
`(mounting medium for microscopic preparations) and a cover
`glass. Three hours after embedding the dry preparations were
`ready to be examined under the microscope. The microscopic
`pictures were taken with a Zeiss Axioskop H DIC and a Minolta
`7000 camera with Ektachrome 50 EPY and 64 T films.
`A semiquantitative standard measure (relative unit = rU) was
`selected in order to estimate the distribution of colored particles
`in the tissues. The values represent grades of severity and were
`estimated as integers from the above mentioned tissue sections;
`they ind~cate the mean of at least 5 different microscopic pictures
`(sectors) per section. The severity grades were defined as follows:
`0 rU: no iron :
`No iron detectable with this method.
`I rU: very little: Only traces of iron , sometimes detectable only
`locally. Very fine-grained iron deposit or only
`individual iron particles.
`Several clearly detectable fine to medium(cid:173)
`sized iron deposits or only few medium-sized
`iron particles.
`Iron is distributed over the whole tissue; local
`agglomerations can appear. Fine to medium(cid:173)
`sized iron particles.
`Clear
`iron deposits everywhere. Fine
`coarse-grained iron particles.
`Further increase in the frequency of iron par(cid:173)
`ticles and in the densit y of the agglomerations;
`often with coarse-clotted iron deposits.
`6 rU: ve ry much: Maximum iron deposit in the whole region of
`the tissue.
`Relative amounts of iron found in selected tissue areas and cells
`(e.g. reticulo-endothelial system (RES) and parenchyma) are ex(cid:173)
`pressed as proportions with integers for the description of the
`relative quantities. The same tissue sections and microscopic
`pictures (sectors) were used for each section.
`With 0.9 % NaCl as test solution , all tissue sections show a rel(cid:173)
`ative iron concentration of 0-1 rU .
`Undue toxicity tests in white mice were carried out according to
`BP guidelines (British Pharmacopoeia 1988) relating to iron dex(cid:173)
`tran injection and iron sorbitol injection.
`
`2 rU: little:
`
`3 rU: moderate:
`
`4 rU: distinct:
`
`5 rU: much:
`
`to
`
`2.2. MateJi.als and method of analysis
`The iron preparations were taken from the market or from our
`own manufacturing lines. All preparations were reanalyzed with
`respect to their iron content. Further determinations of the car(cid:173)
`bohydrate content, the point of zero charge, the degradation ki(cid:173)
`netics, and the molecular mass by gelchromatography were car(cid:173)
`ried out (the results are given in Table 3). All preparations were
`used in parenteral iron therapy, except for Fe-AA and the low
`molecular mass iron dextrin complex Fe-Ma, which has been
`chosen for comparison with Fe-Am.
`
`2.2.1. Determination of the iron content
`Complex bound iron was mineralized with hydrochloric acid ( 10
`ml of HCI 37 w/w % for 5 ml iron complex solution), oxidized
`with l g potassium persulfate, diluted with l 00 ml distilled water
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 2
`
`

`

`and IO ml glacial acetic acid , adjusted wit h NaOH 30 w/w % at
`pH 2.2- 2.5 and tit rated at 40-50 °C wit h 0.1 moll! EDTANa 2
`and pyrocatecholdi sulphonic acid disodium salt (trade name =
`Tiron) as indicator until the color changed from red to green,
`and finally to yellow.
`
`2.2.2. Determination of the carbohydra te content
`2 x I m l distilled water, 2 x I ml standard solution ( 145 mg su(cid:173)
`crose dissol ved with distilled water to a volume of 100 m l solu(cid:173)
`tion) resp. 2 x I ml test solution (0.5-2.5 ml iron complex so(cid:173)
`lution , depending on the expected carbohydrate content, dis(cid:173)
`solved with distilled water to a volume of 100 ml solution) were
`added into 2 x 3 test tubes wi th gro und glass stoppers by means
`of a I ml Hamilton syringe. Thereafter 10 ml anthrone reagent
`were added and mixed thoroughly (200 mg anthrone weighed
`into a 100 ml volumetric fl ask, rinsed down with 20 ml distilled
`water; 60 ml concentrated sulfuric acid were slowly added while
`continuous cooling was ensured. After complete dissolution it
`was fi lled up to I 00 ml with cone. sulfuric acid). The test tubes
`we re placed into a boiling water bath; the stop wa tch was started
`and the test tubes closed with glass stoppers. The rack was placed
`in cold running water after exactl y 10 min. After cooling, the
`content of the test tubes was mixed thoroughly. The absorption
`spectrum was measured with a spectrophotometer in the range
`of 600-650 nm in IO mm glass cuvettes. The carboh ydrate con(cid:173)
`tent was calculated from the m easured absorption and the cali(cid:173)
`bration curve.
`
`2.2.3. Determination of the point of zero charge
`0.2-1.0 ml (depending on the iron content) of iron complex so(cid:173)
`lution was transferred into a 200 ml beaker and diluted with I 00
`ml of distilled water. 0.1 molll hydrochloric acid or 0. 1 moll!
`sodium hydroxide solution was slowly added from a burette
`while magnetic stirring, potentiometric pH measurement and
`horizontal illumination through the beaker with a microscopic
`lamp were carried out in a darkened room , until a distinct, per(cid:173)
`manent turbidit y appeared. At this point the pH was read . 'None'
`m eans that no turbidity or precipitation occurred (complexes
`which are stable enough not to precipitate still have a point of
`zero charge).
`
`2.2.4. Determination of the degradation kinetics
`The degradation kinetics were determined according to the
`method of Erni et al.
`(1984) at 25 °C. The k-values
`[k · 1000 · min- 1] given in Table 3 were calculated at 8 = 0.1 , 0. 5
`and 0.9. The k-values at 8 = 0.5 for monodisperse systems, and
`those at 8 = 0.1 and 0.9 for mixtures were used respectivel y for
`the correlation diagram with the molecular masses as shown in
`fig. 30 (cf. discussion).
`
`2.2.5. Determination of molecular masses
`The m ethod is based on the applicat ion of HPLC to permeation
`chromatography on poly(methylmethacrylate) gel. The following
`equipment was used: Waters HPLC-station, consisting of Waters
`590 programmable pump, WISP 710B autosampler, column
`oven connected with Waters 4 IO differential refractometer and
`a Waters system interface module. For operation and data eval(cid:173)
`uation, MAXIMA 820 software was used. The following columns
`were used: HEMA-Bio 100, IOµ , 8 x 30 mm , and H EMA-Bio
`1000, IOµ , 8 x 300 mm, by Stagroma AG (Wallisellen , Switz(cid:173)
`erland). These two columns were connected in series and tber(cid:173)
`mostated at 45 °C. An aqeuous solution of 0.02 moll! Na 2HPO 4
`and 0.02 moll! NaH 2PO4 was used as solvent. The solven t flow
`was 0.5 ml/min at a pressure of max . 2000 psi. The refractometer
`was set to a sensitivity of 32 and a scale factor of 50.
`A Shodex standard ki t (Showa D enko K. K. , Tokyo, Japan; Dis(cid:173)
`tributor Switzerland: Macherey and Nagel, Oensingen), contain(cid:173)
`ing pullulanes (polymaltotriose-polymer) with different Mw val(cid:173)
`ues was used for calibration (Table 2).
`The pullulanes had been calibrated by the supplier by means of
`an ultracentrifugal sedimentation equilibrium m ethod. The first
`and last point of the calibration curve was performed with a mix(cid:173)
`ture of dextran T 2000 (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) with a Mw
`of approx. 2.000.000, and glucose with a Mw of 180. A calibra(cid:173)
`tion curve was obta ined from the relat ionship log Mw versus re(cid:173)
`tention time. By means of this curve, the molecular masses of
`the iron complexes were calcul ated after integration of the rele(cid:173)
`vant peaks.
`Values of the calibration curve:
`Curve T ype= cubic; r2 = 0.99948; Standard Error= 0.033 13
`
`Table 2: Pullulan standard kit characteristics.
`
`Grade
`
`P-800
`P-400
`P-200
`P-100
`P- 50
`P- 20
`P- 10
`P-
`5
`
`853.000
`380.000
`186.000
`100.000
`48.000
`23. 700
`12.200
`5.800
`
`1.14
`1. 12
`1.1 3
`1. 10
`1.09
`1.07
`1.06
`1.07
`
`Equation of the Curve:
`log Mw = + 3.09E + 0 1 - 2. 07E + 100 x R + 5.72E-02 x R 2
`- 5.73E-04 X R 3
`(R = retention time)
`
`30 Characterization of the analyzed
`iron preparations
`3.1. Compilation of the results
`The results are shown in Table 3.
`
`3.2. Description of the tested preparations
`(cf. Table 3 and Discussion)
`3.2.1. Fe-Da-BP/USP, Fe-Da5, Fe-Da20, Fe-Am
`These iron complexes are composed of a polynuclear iron
`hydroxide complexed with dextran (polyisomaltose) or
`with dextrin (polymaltose); (amylum has a higher molec(cid:173)
`ular mass than maltrin of Fe-Ma). The molecular mass
`and the complex stability are higher in comparison to all
`other tested iron preparations (cf. Table 3). This leads to
`the observed low toxicity (MUiler 1974). Thus the iron
`dextranates and dextrinates are suited especially for in(cid:173)
`tramuscular application, but they are also used for intra(cid:173)
`venous inj ection or infusion (Fe-Da-BP/USP, Fe-Da5 ,
`Fe-Am) or for TDI (total dose infusion) (Fe-Da-BP/USP,
`Fe-Da5, Fe-Am) (Hallberg et al. 1970, Dresch 1976).
`
`3.2.2. Fe-Su-I, Fe-Su-II, Fe-SU-III, Fe-Ma
`These iron complexes are composed of a polynuclear iron
`hydroxide, complexed with sucrose (Fe-Su-I, Fe-Su-II,
`Fe-Su-III), and with dextrin (Fe-Ma). The molecular
`mass and the complex stability are lower in comparison
`to iron dextran , resulting in the observed higher toxicity
`(Millier 1974). But iron saccharates are still suited espe(cid:173)
`cially for intravenous application (cf. Discussion).
`The molecular mass and the complex stability of Fe-Ma,
`an iron complex used for oral application, are lower in
`comparison to Fe-Am , resulting in the higher toxicity ob(cid:173)
`served (cf. Table 3).
`
`3.2.3. Fe -DiSoCi, Fe-SuGl, Fe-AA, Fe-ChS
`The first two of these iron complexes are composed of an
`oligonuclear iron hydroxide complexed with dextrin, sor(cid:173)
`bitol and citric acid (Fe-DiSoCi), and with sucrose and
`gluconi c acid (Fe-Su GI). The molecular masses and com(cid:173)
`plex stabilities are very low in comparison to iron dextran
`and iron saccharates. Citric acid and gluconic acid yield
`a substantially better complex with iron hydroxide than
`do sorbitol and sucrose, so that in these mixtures mainly
`low molecular mass iron(IIl)-hydroxide citric acid com(cid:173)
`plex and partially gluconic acid complex respectively are
`present (cf. Table 3). This results in a comparatively
`higher toxicity (Millier 1974).
`Fe-AA is composed mainly of mononuclear iron(II)- and
`iron(IIl)-ascorbate and -dehydroascorbate. The complex
`stability with alloxanic acid is neglectable in comparison
`to asco rbic acid. The system iron(Il)/(111) / ascorbic acid,
`which generates radicals, becomes toxic fo r liver and mu(cid:173)
`cosa cells (Zglinicki et al. 1990, Hiraishi et al. I 99 1 ).
`
`3
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 3
`
`

`

`'fable 3: Colll pilation of the results.
`
`I ron preparation
`
`Iron
`content
`(mg/ml]
`
`Point of
`Ligand content pH of th e zero charge
`(mg/llll]
`solution
`(pH]
`
`Degradation
`kinetics
`(k x 10 min· 1l
`9 - 0.1/0.5/0.9
`
`Molecular mass Undue toxicity in
`white mice, i.v.
`of complex
`[ lllg Fe/kg body
`[Dalton]
`weight]
`
`Points in
`correlation
`diagram
`(Fig. 30)
`
`48.6
`
`206
`
`49.3
`
`64
`
`198.0
`
`205
`
`50.3
`
`20.2
`
`20.0
`
`20. 3
`
`none'>
`
`20/34/67
`
`none4>
`
`23/ 34/66
`
`none4>
`
`12/27/50
`
`none4>
`
`9/20/42
`
`5.0
`
`4.5
`
`107/89/1 17
`
`I 10/87/129
`
`6.0
`
`6.0
`
`6.0
`
`5.8
`
`10.8
`
`9.6
`
`9.7
`
`103 ODO
`
`523 000
`
`445 000
`
`462 000
`
`43 300
`
`31 100
`
`> 500
`
`> I 000
`
`> I 000
`> 10 000 (i.p.)
`> I 000
`
`> 200
`
`I
`
`> 200
`
`180')
`
`I
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`Fe-Da-BP/ USP
`(Lot O I 5109)
`Fe-Das
`(Lot 9 I I 308)
`Fe-Da20
`(Lot 985108)
`Fe-Am
`(Lot 962208)
`Fe-Su- I
`(Lot 7 50208)
`Fe-Su-II
`(Lot 951108)
`Fe-Su-III
`(Lot Y 288)
`Fe-Ma
`(Lot 919218)
`Fe-DiSoCi
`(Lot 09.109.43 I)
`FeSuG I
`(Lot 9 114570 1)_
`Fe-AA
`(Lot NN 348.102)
`Fe-ChS
`(Lot 91.1.5510 I)
`
`56
`dextrin
`318
`sucrose
`383
`sucrose
`392
`sucrose
`67
`dextrin
`)6Ql)
`
`197')
`
`5 mg Ase.a. 3>
`5 mg All.a.3>
`-
`
`50.4
`
`50.5
`
`12.5
`
`2.0
`
`3.8
`
`5.3
`
`77/8 1/ 107
`
`none4>
`
`5 1/7 3/ 11 8
`
`2.2
`
`3.6
`
`2.6
`
`449/ 320/ 204
`
`i 36/ 130/ 130
`
`615/608/96
`
`none4l
`
`144/ 98/8
`
`6.0
`
`7.3
`
`8.4
`
`7.3
`
`7.4
`
`48 200
`
`52 300
`
`8 700
`
`37 500
`< I OOO'l
`< I 000
`
`47 800
`I 400 000
`
`> 400
`
`> 50
`
`> 50
`
`> 50
`
`250')
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`II
`
`12
`13
`
`1> As sorbitol and dextrin (cf. Methods of ana lysis); contains also citric acid, wh ich is not included. 2> As sucrose (cf. Methods of analysis); contains also
`23 mg sodium gluconate/ml (value from th e declaration) with a lllolecular mass of < 1000 Daltons. 3> Ascorbic acid and alloxanic acid (values from the
`declaration). •> For the explanation of 'none' cf. methods of analysis. 1l LD , 0-value in white mice as indicated in the leaflet.
`Key to the abbreviations of the preparations: Fe-Da BP/USP: iron dex tran BP/ USP manufactured by Hausma nn Laboratories; Fe-DaS: iron dextan 5 %
`hulllan: Ferrum HausI11ann"' i.lll .: Dexfcrrulll ; Fe-Da20: iron dextran 20 %, Anaemex® (Hausmann); Fe-Am: iron dextrin (amylum) complex, Ferrum
`Hau smann® i.lll.: Amylofcrrum; Fe-Su-I: iron sucrose colllpl ex, Ferrulll Hau sman n"' i.v.: Venoferrum; Fe-Su-II: iron sucrose complex, Feppsol,
`manufactured by Hau smann Laboratories, distributed by Green Cross, Japan; Fe-Su-Ill: iron sucrose colllplex; Fe-Ma: iron dextrin (maltrin) com plex,
`Maltofcrrum (active ingredient ofFcrrum Hausmann® chewable tablets, syrup and drops); Fe-DiSoCi: iron dextrin/sorbitol/ citric acid colllplex; Fe-SuGI:
`iron sucrose/gluconic acid complex; Fe-AA: iron ascorbic acid/ allox an ic acid; Fe-ChS: iron chondroitinsu lphate.
`
`Fe-ChS is a mixture of iron(III)-chondroitinsulphates
`with very different molecular masses (cf. Table 3). The
`high molecular mass fraction has a similar complex sta(cid:173)
`bility as iron dextran, resulting in the fact that this com(cid:173)
`plex is present in the serum fo r a long time after appli(cid:173)
`cation (half-life time in rats: approx . 4 h).
`
`I
`
`4. Results
`4.1. General remarks about histology
`Histological tests were carried through in order to deter(cid:173)
`mine the distribution of intravenously applied iron in
`liver, kidney, adrenal, lung and spleen. At the same time
`the tissue sections involved were carefully checked for
`damages such as necrosis. It is to be noted that with cer(cid:173)
`tain iron preparations the selected standard dose of 200
`mg Fe/kg b.w. was already close to the LD 50-value (cf.
`Table 3), so that ceU damages were likely to appear.
`
`4.2. Results in detail
`The deposited quantities of iron (in relative units, cf.
`Methods) in liver, kidney, adrena l, lung and spleen, in
`correlation with the time after appli cation (IO min, 4 h,
`4 d and 14 d) are shown in Fig. 1-5.
`
`4.2.1. Comments on liver sections (cf. Table 4)
`Fe-Da5, Fe-Da20, Fe-Am
`The distribution and relative concentrations of iron de(cid:173)
`posits correspond largely to the picture of iron dextran
`BP/USP (Fig. 6-9).
`
`Fe-Su-II, Fe-Su-III
`The distribution and relative concentrations of iron de(cid:173)
`posits correspond largely to the picture of Fe-Su-I (Fig.
`10-1 2).
`
`Fe-Ma
`After 4 d (Fig. 13) and 14 d, necroses were found over
`the whole tissue. After 14 d a phase of regeneration was
`observed.
`
`Fe-AA
`Dose: The following doses had to be selected for toxico(cid:173)
`logical reasons: 200 mg Fe/kg b.w. (acute toxic region) for
`10 min and 4 h. 100 mg Fe/kg b.w. for 4 d and 14 d.
`Necrotization began 10 min post injectionem. After 4 h
`there were severe necroses in the periportal region with
`the most part of deposited iron in the parenchyrna (Fig.
`16).
`
`Fe-ChS
`Necrotization bega n 4 h post injectionem. After 4 d there
`were already some necroses in the periportal region (Fig.
`17).
`In those mice which survived only 2 days because of the
`high toxicity of the iron injected, 4 rU of iron were found
`in the liver: homogeneously distributed, partly coarse(cid:173)
`grained, generally more in the RES than in parenchyma.
`The proportion between periportal and central area was
`about I : I. Small to medium-sized necroses were visible
`all over the tissue.
`
`4.2.2. Comments on kidney sections (cf. Table 5)
`Fe-DiSoCi
`A dark brown coloration of the urine appearing IO min
`after the i.v. application is the most noticeable phenom(cid:173)
`enon and is caused by the excretion oflow molecular iron
`complexes, which are detectable in the histological prep(cid:173)
`aration of the calix (Fig. 21). All tested organs are free
`from iron after 4 days already.
`
`4
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 4
`
`

`

`-
`D
`
`RES (endothelium, Kupffe r's cells)
`porenchymo
`
`cortex
`-
`c=J medulla, zono reticuloris
`
`5
`
`4
`
`2 ·c
`
`:,
`
`Q)
`
`~ 3
`0
`~
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0..
`(/1
`::,
`
`'-0.. w
`
`I
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`U")
`
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`-
`
`=
`
`:,
`(/1
`I
`"-
`
`c3
`:,
`(/1
`I
`"
`"-
`
`::i:
`I
`"
`"-
`
`(/1
`JC
`
`u
`I
`"
`"-
`
`.
`
`0
`0
`0
`N
`E
`(/1
`0
`:,
`:,
`0
`i5
`::!,
`0
`(/1
`(/1
`<(
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`dist ribution afte r 1 Omi n/ 4h/ 4d/1 4d
`•( ofter 1Omin/ 105min/ 4h/ 4d)
`Fig. 1: Distribution or iro n depos its in histological section s of the li ver. The di stributi o n is
`given in relative units afte r IO min , 4 h, 4 d and 14 d (" corresponds to IO min, I 05 min , 4 h
`and 4 d). For further details cf. 4.2. These details app ly also to Fig. 2-5. For a cli nicall y safe
`iron preparation the iron deposit shou ld mainl y be in the RES (cf. Discussion).
`
`~
`C
`:,
`
`Q)
`
`.2:
`0
`~
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0..
`(/1
`::,
`'-0..
`w
`I
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`"'
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`0
`0
`0
`N
`E
`(/1
`:,
`:,
`0
`:,
`0
`i5
`::!,
`0
`(/1
`<(
`(/1
`(/1
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`distribution after 1 Omin/ 4h/ 4d/14d
`•(ofter 1Omin/ 105min/ 4h/ 4d)
`Fig. 3: Distribut ion or iron deposits in histo logical sectio ns of the adrena l gland.
`
`-
`
`=
`
`-
`
`c3
`:,
`(/1
`I
`"
`"-
`
`::i:
`I
`"
`"-
`
`(/1
`
`JC u
`I
`" "-
`
`~
`C
`:,
`
`Q)
`
`> :g
`~
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0..
`(/1
`::,
`'-0..
`w
`I
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`U")
`
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`0
`N
`0
`0
`I
`"-
`
`:,
`(/1
`I
`"-
`
`-
`
`c3
`:,
`(/1
`I
`
`" "-
`
`::i:
`I
`" "-
`
`(/1
`
`JC u
`t "-
`
`0
`=
`0
`(/1
`~
`0
`:,
`:,
`i5
`::!,
`(/1
`(/1
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`distribution after 1 Om in/ 4h/ 4d/14d
`•(ofter 1Omin/ 105min/ 4h/ 4d)
`Fig. 4: Distribution or iron deposits· in histo logical sections of the lung.
`
`glomeruli
`-
`lllllilllllll inte rstitium. loop cells
`D
`tubuli
`
`tissue (septa)
`-
`c=J interstitium, introvosculor
`
`2 ·c
`
`:,
`
`Q)
`
`l
`0
`~
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`0
`
`0..
`(/1
`::,
`
`'-0.. w
`
`I
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`U")
`
`0
`0
`I
`"
`"-
`
`=
`
`-
`
`c3
`:,
`(/1
`t
`
`"-
`
`::i:
`I
`"
`"-
`
`(/1
`JC
`
`u
`I
`"
`"-
`
`0
`0
`0
`N
`E
`(/1
`:,
`0
`:,
`:,
`0
`i5
`::!,
`0
`(/1
`<(
`(/1
`(/1
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`"-
`distrib ution after 1 Omin/ 4 h/ 4d/14d
`•(ofter 1Omin/ 105min/ 4h/ 4d)
`Fig. 2: Distribution of iron deposits in histologica l sect ions of the kidney. For a clin ica lly safe
`and well utilized iron preparation the iron deposit should not be in th e tubu li (cf. Discussion).
`
`v,
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 5
`
`

`

`red pulpo, marginal zone
`-
`CJ white pulpo
`
`00
`n.
`V,
`::::,
`'-n.
`m
`I
`0
`0
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`0
`
`"'
`0
`0
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`0
`N
`0
`0
`I
`LL
`
`.,
`
`E
`<(
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`:,
`V,
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`:,
`V,
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`.e ·2
`
`:::,
`
`Q)
`
`> :g
`~
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`0
`
`-
`
`:,
`V,
`I
`LL
`
`0
`::;
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`u
`0
`V,
`0
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`c3
`:,
`V,
`I .,
`
`LL
`
`::;
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`V,
`.i=
`0
`.,
`I
`LL
`
`"
`d istribution after 1 Om in/ 4h/ 4d/14d
`•(ofte r 1Omin/105min/ 4h/ 4d)
`Fig. 5: Dislribution of iron deposits in histological sections of the splee n.
`
`Table 4: Liver - Whole iron concentrations in liver tissue in relative units (rU), and proportions of iron deposits between RES and parenchyma (par.)
`and between periporta l (pport.) and central (cent.) area in function of time after application.
`
`Code and time
`
`rU
`
`RES: par.
`
`pport.: cent.
`
`Necroses
`
`Deposits
`
`Fe-Da-BP/US P
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Da5
`IO min
`4 h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Da20
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Am
`IO min
`4 h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Su-I
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Su-II
`IO.n1in
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Su-III
`10 min
`4 h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-Ma
`IO min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-DiSoCi
`IO min
`13/4 h
`4h
`4d
`Fe-SuGI
`10 min
`4 h
`4d
`14 d
`
`6
`
`0
`I
`4
`3
`
`0
`2
`4
`3
`
`0
`3
`4
`2
`
`I
`2
`3
`3
`
`4
`4
`4
`4
`
`I
`4
`4
`4
`
`3
`5
`4
`4
`
`I
`3
`5
`4
`
`0
`3
`0
`0
`
`4
`4
`5
`3
`
`0
`1.0
`20:1
`20:1
`
`0
`6: I
`6: I
`6: I
`
`0
`7: I
`6:1
`4:1
`
`5: I
`5: I
`4:1
`7: I
`
`4:1
`9: 1
`9:1
`9:1
`
`0
`9:1
`9:1
`9:1
`
`20: I
`3: I
`9: I
`20: I
`
`4: I
`5: I
`1:2
`4:1
`
`0
`1:2
`0
`0
`
`1:2
`1:2
`1:2
`2: I
`
`0
`1: 1
`1:1
`1: 1
`
`0
`1:1
`2: I
`1:1
`
`0
`1:1
`2: 1
`1:1
`
`1:1
`l;l
`I:I
`1:1
`
`2:1
`2:1
`2:1
`2: I
`
`1:1
`I;}
`1:1
`1:1
`
`2:1
`2: 1
`2: 1
`1:1
`
`1:1
`1:1
`2:1
`1:1
`
`0
`10:1
`0
`0
`
`5 I
`5 I
`4 I
`4 I
`
`none
`none
`few small
`few small
`
`-
`non e
`none
`non e
`
`none
`none
`none
`none
`
`none
`none
`none
`none
`
`few small
`few small
`few small
`no more
`
`none
`none
`few small
`no more
`
`none
`few small
`few small
`no more
`
`none
`none
`many med.-big
`many med.-big
`
`none
`none
`none
`none
`
`fine gr.
`med.-coa.-gr. (Fig. 6)
`med.-coa.-gr.
`
`-
`fine-med.-gr.
`fine-med.-gr. (Fig. 7)
`med. -gr.
`
`-
`med.-gr.
`med.-coa.-gr. (Fig. 8)
`med.-coa.-gr.
`
`fine-med.-gr.
`med.-gr.
`med.-gr. (Fig. 9)
`med.-gr.
`
`med.siz.
`med.-coa.-gr, (Fig. 10)
`med.-coa.-gr.
`med.-coa.-gr.
`
`fine gr.
`med.-coa.-gr. (Fig. 11)
`med .-coa.-gr
`med .-coa.-gr.
`
`med.siz.
`med.-siz. (Fig. 12)
`med.-coa.-gr.
`-
`
`fine-med.-gr.
`fine-m ed.-gr.
`med.-coa.-gr. (Fig. I 3)
`med.-coa.-gr.
`
`-
`fine gr. (Fig. 14)
`-
`-
`
`few small
`many big
`many small and med.
`few small
`
`small and med.-gr.
`med.- and coa.-gr. (Fig. 15)
`fine-med.-gr. and coa. -gr.
`med.-coa.-gr.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1043 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Table 4 continued.
`
`Code a nd time
`
`rU
`
`RES: pa r.
`
`pport.: cent.
`
`Necroses
`
`Deposits
`
`Fe-AA
`10 min
`4 h
`4d
`14 d
`Fe-ChS
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`
`4
`3
`I
`l
`
`3
`4
`5
`2
`
`1: 5
`1:4
`1: 2
`1: 2
`
`1:6
`3:1
`2:1
`4:1
`
`10:1
`10:1
`10:1
`20:1
`
`10:1
`1: 1
`l : l
`1:1
`
`many sm all
`many med . a nd big
`few very small
`none
`
`none
`few small
`many m ed.
`few small
`
`fin e gr.
`fine gr. and med .-coa.-gr. (Fi g. 16)
`fine-med.-gr.
`fine gr.
`
`fin e-gr.
`fine -med.-gr.
`fin e, med. and coa. -gr. (Fig. l 7)
`few fine, more m ed.
`
`Table 5: Kidney - Whole iron concentrati ons in kidney tissue in relative units (rU), a nd proportions of iron deposits be tween glomeruli , tubuli, and
`interstitium in fun ction of time after appli cation.
`
`Code and time
`
`rU
`
`Glomeruli
`
`lntersti tium
`
`Tubuli
`
`Comment s on the iron depos it s found
`
`Fe-Da-BP/USP
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`
`Fe-Da5
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`
`Fe-Da20
`10 min
`4h
`4d
`14 d
`
`Fe-Am
`10 min
`4h
`4 d
`14 d
`
`0
`0
`I
`0
`
`I
`2
`l
`l
`
`0
`l
`I
`I
`
`I
`2
`3
`2
`
`-
`-
`4
`-
`
`I
`8
`9
`I

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket