throbber
(cid:9)
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING
`SITES SPECIFIC FOR TERMINAL OR
`NONTERMINAL ANTIGENIC DETERMINANTS IN DEXTRAN*
`
`By JOHN CISAR,f ELVIN A . KABAT, MARIANNE M . DORNER,§ AND JERRY LIAO
`
`(From the Departments of Microbiology, Human Genetics and Development, and Neurology, College
`of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, and the Neurological Institute, Presbyterian
`Hospital, New York 10032)
`
`Since the discovery by Landsteiner (1, 2) that low molecular weight haptens
`would react with antihapten antibody to inhibit precipitation by azoprotein
`antigens, and of Marrack and Smith (3) that binding of haptens to antibody
`could be demonstrated by equilibrium dialysis, such interactions have been used
`for identifying antigenic determinants and for establishing specificities and sizes
`of antibody combining sites (cf. 4, 5) .
`Specificities for carbohydrate antigens often appear to be directed toward the structure
`and linkage of terminal nonreducing sugars . This was first recognized by Goebel, Avery,
`and Babers (6), who found that the structure of the terminal nonreducing sugar was of
`predominant importance in determining cross-reactions with rabbit antisera to various
`disaccharides conjugated to horse serum globulin . Later, Karush (7) showed that
`lactoside-specific rabbit antibodies, produced by immunization with a lactosyl-azoprotein
`conjugate, had the major portion of their binding energies directed against the terminal
`,d-linked galactose . With glycoproteins and polysaccharides there are many examples of
`terminal antigenic determinants . These include the A, B, H, and Lewis specificities of
`human blood group substances (8, 9), terminal glucuronic acid residues which are
`involved in the specificity of Type II pneumoccous polysaccharide (10-13 cf. 4, 5, 14), and
`terminal fl-N-acetylglucosamine for Group A (15) and a-N-acetylgalactosamine for Group
`C (16) specificities in streptococcal polysaccharides (cf. 17) . Certain determinants in
`teichoic acids (17-21 cf. 22) and in the somatic antigens of Salmonella (23, 24) and
`Shigella (25) are also of this type .
`Antigenic determinants which do not require a terminal end group have also been
`recognized . Polysaccharides such as the type III and VIII pneumococcal polysaccharides
`which were shown to be linear (26) and thus to have one nonreducing end per milecule had
`long been known to precipitate with homologous antisera and also to cross-react (cf. 4) .
`The determinant of the Type III polysaccharide (S III) was shown to consist of three
`repeating units of the disaccharide, cellobiuronic acid (27) . Moreover, Heidelberger and
`
`Science Foundation GB 35243-X-1, X-2 and
`*Aided by a grant from the National
`BMS-72-02219-A02, and in part by a General Research Support Grant from the United States Public
`Health Service to Columbia University .
`f Present address: School of Dentistry, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
`80220.
`§ Present address: Medizinische Universitaets-Klinik Bergheimer Strasse 58, 6900 Heidelberg,
`Germany.
`THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE - VOLUME 142, 1975
`
`435
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 1
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`
`436
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING SITES
`
`Rebers (28) attributed the cross-reactivity between anti-S IV sera and S II to (1 --a
`3) -linked L-rhamnose units which occur at intervals along linear sugar chains . Nontermi-
`nal determinants are important in Shigella (25) and Salmonella (24), examples being deter-
`minants 3 and 15 of group E Salmonella which involve repeating [a D Gal(1- 6)D Man-
`(1-4)L Rham(1--,3) ] sequences (29) . In addition, certain specificities for teichoic acids
`(30 cf . 22) are of this type . It has been suggested that steric factors play a role in the proper
`exposure of certain terminal (31-33) and nonterminal (34) sugar determinants .
`Dextrans are branched polymers of a-linked D glucopyranosyl units and their relatively
`simple structures have made them especially useful in immunochemical studies of
`homopolysaccharide antigens . Specificities involving all -" 6)- and all - 2)-, all - 3)-,
`all - 4)-linked D glucopyranosyl units have been described (35-43) . The reactions of all
`6) -specific antidextrans have been thought to occur at the nonreducing ends of glucose
`chains with the terminal all - 6)-linked D glucopyranosyl residue being immunodomi-
`nant . The evidence for this has come from the structure of these polysaccharides which
`have several nonreducing ends but only one reducing end, and from inhibition of precipi-
`tation studies with isomaltose oligosaccharides from which it appeared that a majority
`of the binding energy was contributed by the terminal nonreducing glucose (44, 45, cf.
`4, 5) . In addition, rabbits which had been immunized with bovine serum albumin (BSA)'
`conjugates of isomaltotrionic acid (IM3-CONH-BSA) (46), and isomaltohexaonic acid
`(IM6-CONH-BSA) (47), produced antibodies whose quantitative precipitin reactions
`with dextrans were similar to those of all - 6)-specific antidextrans . However, the best
`inhibitor for certain rabbit sera to IM3-CONH-BSA was larger than the trisaccharide
`which suggested as one possibility that specificities for nonterminal antigenic determi-
`nants such as (-0-(1 - 6)-D Glc-a-0-) sequences might exist (46) . Moreover, Richter (48)
`has shown that rabbit antibodies to a dextran-protein conjugate made with a dextran frag-
`ment of mol wt 4,400 could precipitate a synthetic linear dextran (49, 50) which implied
`that these antibodies were capable of reacting with nonterminal glucosyl residues . Con-
`canavalin A, which is thought to react at terminal nonreducing ends of dextran chains,
`does not precipitate with synthetic linear dextran (51) . These findings raise two questions
`of fundamental importance : (a) Are antidextrans and antibodies against isomaltosyl oligo-
`saccharides coupled to protein, mixtures of antibodies with specificities directed toward
`terminal nonreducing as well as nonterminal oligosaccharide sequences? (b) Can anti-
`bodies against terminal determinants cross-react at nonterminal locations along the dex-
`tran chain?
`The existence of several homogeneous BALB/c mouse myeloma proteins with specifici-
`ties for dextrans (52-55), fructosans (54-56), and galactans (57-59) provides a very useful
`approach to these questions . Three dextran-reactive myeloma globulins, W3129, W3434
`and QUPC 52, have been shown (55) to have all -+ 6) specificities . Proteins W3129 and
`W3434 differed slightly in specificity (55) and idiotype (60), but both showed maximum
`complementarity to isomaltopentaose (IM5) while protein QUPC 52 showed maximum
`binding for isomaltohexaose (IM6) and was not related idiotypically to W3129 .
`We have now determined the binding energies for the interactions of proteins
`W3129 and QUPC 52 with each member of the isomaltose series and with methyl
`aDglucoside . These results indicate the protein W3129 has a nonreducing
`terminal specificity for ce(1 - 6) chains of dextran while protein QUPC 52 has
`nonterminal specificity . This was confirmed by precipitin reactions with a
`synthetic linear dextran which failed to precipitate protein W3129 but precipi-
`tated QUPC 52 . The correlation between the binding properties of these
`myeloma proteins and their precipitin reactions with the synthetic dextran (49,
`50) provides further evidence that this dextran reacts immunochemically as a
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 2
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`
`J. CISAR, E. A. KABAT, M. M. DORNER, AND J. LIAO
`
`437
`completely linear molecule. In addition, quantitative precipitin studies with
`linear and branched dextrans favor the concept that some human antidextran
`molecules also react only at terminal nonreducing ends while others can react at
`nonterminal locations along linear dextran chains . Moreover, rabbit antisera
`against IM3 or IM6 coupled to BSA' contain fractions of molecules which
`precipitate linear dextran and thus must be capable of nonterminal reactions
`with dextran chains . These findings provide a fundamental insight into the
`immunochemistry of dextran and probably other polysaccharide antigens .
`
`Materials and Methods
`Human and Rabbit Antisera and Mouse Myeloma Proteins .
`Human antidextrans are listed in
`Table I along with the dextrans employed for immunization . Serum 1 D., .,, was a pool obtained by
`plasmapheresis of subject 1 seven times over a period of 2 mo, and was taken 18 1/2 years after
`immunization with dextran B1255. Rabbit antisera against IM3-CONH-BSA (46) and IM6-CONH-
`BSA (47) were those studied previously . BALB/c mouse IgA myeloma proteins W3129, QUPC 52,
`W3082, and UPC 61 have been described (55) and were from serum or ascites fluid generously
`provided by Doctors Melvin Cohn and Martin Weigert (The Salk Institute, San Diego, Calif.), and
`Dr . Michael Potter of NIH.
`Purification of Human Antidextrans and Mouse Myeloma Proteins .
`Purification of antidextrans
`and myeloma proteins was by a standard batch-wise immunoadsorption procedure (63-65) using
`Sephadex G75 (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Inc ., Piscataway, N. J.) for human antidextrans and
`proteins W3129 and QUPC 52 and levan gel (66, 68, 69) for human antilevans and proteins W3082 and
`UPC 61 . After adsorption of protein, the insoluble gels were washed with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered
`saline, pH 7.2, 0 .02% sodium azide (PBS) until supernates gave negligible absorption at 280 nm .
`Hapten elution was at 37°C for 1 h and proteins were freed of hapten by at least two passes through
`columns of Bio-Gel P-10 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) (68, 69) and concentrated by
`ultrafiltration with collodion bags (Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, N. H.) or above a Diaflow
`UM-10 membrane (Amicon Corporation, Lexington, Mass .) .
`Antidextrans from 3,726 ml of 1 D,,-,o which contained 15 .1 mg antidextran nitrogen (N) were
`adsorbed on to 922 mg Sephadex G75 and eluted with IM3 and IM6 in a batch-wise modification of
`the procedure described by Harisdangkul and Kabat (68) . The packed Sephadex G75 was eluted first
`with 270 mg of IM3 in 15 ml PBS. This eluate (1 D_ IM3El 1) was concentrated and the
`ultrafiltrate containing most of the IM3 was used for the second IM3 elution and after this, the
`process was repeated a third time . The Sephadex was then washed with PBS and the washings were
`combined with the second and third IM3 eluates to give 1 DS,-, o IM3E12-3 . Then 202 mg IM3 in 15 ml
`PBS were added to the packed Sephadex and this eluate plus the next two were combined to give 1
`D6,_BO IM3E1 4-6. The washed Sephadex was then extracted six times as above starting with 90 mg
`IM6 in 15 ml PBS and these were pooled to give 1 D,,_,p IM6E1 1-6. The total recovery from all
`elutions was 10 .2 mg antidextran N (68%) of which 1 D5,_  IM3E1 1, El 2-3, El 4-6, and IM6E1 1-6
`accounted for 52, 21, 8, and 19% respectively . After removal of antidextrans, human antilevans were
`purified from 1 D5,_  sera by elution from levan gel with 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 3 .7 (66, 68).
`Dextran- and fructosan-specific mouse myeloma proteins were eluted with methyl anglucoside
`and sucrose respectively, which had previously been dialyzed to remove polysaccharides (70) and
`recrystallized from ethanol. With protein W3129, 45 .5 mg of myeloma N was adsorbed to 4 g of
`Sephadex G75, and eluted three times with about 200 mg methyl a n glucoside per mg of myeloma N;
`the final recovery was 36 mg W3129 N (79%) . With protein QUPC 52, 92 mg of myeloma N was
`adsorbed to 6.3 g of Sephadex, washed, and eluted 10 times with methyl anglucoside at about
`420 mg methyl anglucoside per mg of myeloma N; the final recovery was only 26 mg QUPC 52 N
`(28%). The G75 was then eluted repeatedly in the cold (30 min per elution) with 0.1 M glycine HCI
`buffers ranging from pH 3.0 to pH 1.8 and eluates were neutralized immediately after collection . The
`
`this paper: BSA, bovine serum albumin; IM2, isomaltose ; IM3,
``Abbreviations used in
`isomaltotriose ; IM4, isomaltotetraose; IM5, isomaltopentaose ; IM6, isomaltohexaose; IM7, isomal-
`toheptaose ; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline .
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 3
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`
`438
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING SITES
`
`TABLE I
`Human Antidextrans
`
`Linkages
`
`all -~ 6)
`
`a(1 - 3)-
`like
`
`a(1- 4)-
`like
`
`Reference
`
`86
`
`88
`
`88
`
`86
`
`96
`
`0
`
`14
`
`10
`
`4
`
`4
`
`0
`
`4, 5, 36, 37, 45, 61, 63, 65,
`66, 67, 68
`4, 5, 36, 44, 45, 61, 63, 64,
`65, 66, 67
`4, 5, 35, 36, 37, 44, 45, 61,
`66,67
`4,37
`
`4, 5, 45, 62, 64
`
`62
`
`Antidextran
`
`Immunizing
`dextran
`
`ID,+_e0
`
`201),o
`
`30D,
`
`116D,
`
`176D,
`
`219D,
`
`B1255
`(Native)
`OP 155
`(Clinical)
`OP 163
`(Clinical)
`S-5-A-1 .0
`(Clinical)
`NRC Fr . 4
`(Clinical)
`APC-54
`(Clinical)
`
`final yields were : 2.4 mg N at pH 3.0 (one elution) 11 .8 mg N at pH at pH 2.7 to 2.4 (four elutions),
`13 .7 mg N at pH 2.0 (three elutions), and 4.6 mg N at pH 1.8 (three elutions) giving a total recovery
`in the low pH elutions of 32 .5 mg QUPC 52 N (35%) . All eluates were between 90 and 95% reactive
`with Sephadex G75. With proteins W3082 and UPC 61, 1.2 mg myeloma N was adsorbed onto 65 mg
`levan gel and eluted twice with 300 mg sucrose per mg myeloma N which removed virtually all ad-
`sorbed protein.
`Dextrans .
`Native dextran B512 and clinical dextran N-150N have been described (61 cf . 4) . Prof.
`Conrad Schuerch, Chemistry Department, State University College of Forestry, Syracuse, N. Y.,
`kindly provided dextran D3 which by chemical methods appears to be a completely linear polymer of
`a (I - 6)-linked D glucopyranosyl units having a mol wt by viscosity of 36,500 (49, 50). Enzymatic
`degradation experiments indicate that synthetic dextran contains 1-2% of structural flaws (71) .
`Qligosaccharides . The isomaltose oligosaccharides, methyl anglucopyranoside, the ,B
`(2
`1)-linked series of fructose oligosaccharides and sucrose were those described (55) . Methyl
`a-isomaltoside and methyl a-isomaltotrioside (72) were provided by Dr . Allene Jeanes and have been
`studied previously (4, 65) .
`Tritium-labeled isomaltoheptitol Q1H]IM7-OH) was prepared by overnight reduction at 4°C of 90
`umol IM7 with 25 gmol [8111 sodium borohydride (383 mCi/nmol), and the reaction was stopped by
`adding small amounts of 25% acetic acid . The partially reduced and tritiated IM7 was then
`completely reduced with a 20-fold molar excess of NaBH,. After 2 days at 4°C, excess NaBH, was
`destroyed and the [IHIIM7-OH was purified by ethanol elution from a charcoal-celite column,
`followed by preparative paper chromatography with a propanol-ethanol-water (6 :1 :3) solvent system
`and final chromatography on a Bio-Gel P-2 column (minus 400 mesh, 70 x 1 .9 cm) (73) .
`Immunochemical Methods .
`Quantitative precipitin and inhibition assays were done by a
`microtechnique (4) and total N in the washed precipitates was measured by the ninhydrin method
`(74) . The separation of IgA monomer and polymer fractions of protein QUPC 52 and quantitative
`immunoadsorption experiments with dextran-reactive proteins using Sephadex G75 were like those
`described for protein W3129 (55) .
`Isoelectric Focusing.
`Analytical isoelectric focusing in a thin layer of 5% polyacrylamide gel (3%
`cross-linked) containing 2% carrier ampholytes (ampholine pH 3.5-10) was performed with an LKB
`2117 Multiphor unit according to the directions of the manufacturer (LKB-Producter AB, Sweden).
`Gels were fixed overnight in 12% trichloroacetic acid then rinsed in several changes of water to remove
`carrier ampholytes before staining with 0.02% Coomassie Blue in methanol-acetic acid-water
`(45:9 :46) and destaining with a solution of methanol (25%) and acetic acid (10%) . Preparative
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 4
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`
`439
`J. CISAR, E. A. KABAT, M. M. DORNER, AND J. LIAO
`isoelectric focusing of 1 D-,o IM3El 2-3 (1.6 mg N) was done in a 110 ml LKB column at 4°C using
`3% carrier ampholytes (pH 3.5-10) in a sucrose gradient as described by the manufacturer .
`Electrofocusing was for 3 days with a final potential of 700 V.
`Equilibrium Dialysis .
`Equilibrium dialysis and displacement experiments were carried out in
`lucite microdialysis chambers (75) at 25°C f 0.1 ° and PBS was the buffer in all experiments. Dialysis
`tubing was boiled in 2 M Na,CO, and rinsed thoroughly before use. Control experiments (4)
`established that there was no detectable bindingofthe ligand [9H ]IM7-OH to the dialysis membrane,
`to normal human -y-globulin (4.1 mg/ml) or to the levan-reactive IgA mouse myeloma protein Y5476
`(14 mg/ml) (55) . Experiments were done with equal volumes (50 or 75 u1) on each side of the
`membrane and dialysis cells were allowed to reach equilibrium over a 72-h period of continuous
`mixing ; however, displacement experiments with protein QUPC 52 were given an extra day because
`of the high concentrations of competitors employed . Control experiments indicated that equilibrium
`was probably attained in less than 24 h. Samples (20 ,l) for radioactivity measurements were taken
`from the hapten side only (76) and counted in duplicate or triplicate . The [9H]IM7-OH gave about 2.9
`x 10° cpm/,mol in Bray's solution (77) and 3.5 x 10° cpm/,umol in Insta-Gel (Packard Instrument
`Co., Downers Grove, Ill.). In displacement experiments, nonlabeled competitors did not cause any
`detectable quenching ofcounts except for the highest amounts of methyl a D glucoside employed with
`protein QUPC 52 and this occurred only in Insta-Gel and was corrected for. The free concentration of
`competitor was calculated by the method of Nisonoff and Pressman (78).
`Fluorescence Titrations .
`Fluorescence titrations were performed with square quartz semimicro
`cuvettes (5 mm light path, 0.6 ml capacity) and an Aminco-Bowman spectrophotofluorometer
`equipped with a cell jacket thermostated at 25°C (68) . Haptens were added in 5-20,ul volumes to 250
`,ul portions of protein solutions having optical densities of about 0.18 (1 cm light path) at 280 nm.
`None of the haptens absorbed in the 280 nm region and the excitation wave length was set between
`280 and 285 nm depending on the protein and emission was measured between 345 and 350 nm.
`Values for Q... were determined at the end of each titration by averaging the results from two
`additions of a concentrated ligand solution, each resulting in a greater than 97% saturation of sites.
`All titrations were done against a reference cell containing the solution being titrated and in this way
`it was possible to detect and correct for instrument drift. It was also necessary to plan experiments so
`that each addition of hapten resulted in at least a 3% quenching of fluorescence after correction for
`dilution .
`
`Results
`Purified antidextrans from 1
`Isoelectric Focusing of Human Antibodies.
`D5,-60 were 90-95% reactive with Sephadex G75 and analytical isoelectric
`focusing revealed a restriction in heterogeneity as compared with whole -y-
`globulin from the same individual . The patterns for antidextrans eluted with IM3
`(Fig. 1 A,IM3El 1, IM3E1 2-3, and IM3E1 4-6) were similar with three major
`bands near pH 7.0 and several less prominent bands between pH 6.0 and pH 8 .5 .
`The antidextrans eluted with IM6 (Fig. 1 A, IM6E1 1-6) were qualitatively like
`the IM3 eluates, but the three major bands near pH 7 .0 were less obvious while
`those between pH 7.0 and pH 8 .0 accounted for a greater proportion of the total
`protein . Purified antilevan from 1 D,60 (Fig. 1 A, L) and antibodies to blood
`group A substance from 1 D33-a, (Fig. 1 A, A) also were restricted in heterogeneity
`and visibly different from each other and from the 1 D54-60 antidextrans . The
`anti-A antibodies had relatively low isoelectric points . A pH 3.5 to pH 10 gradient
`was used for the preparative separation of 1 Ds,-6o IM3E1 2-3 into seven fractions
`(Fig. 1 B and C) which were studied later.
`Equilibrium Dialysis of Mouse Myeloma Proteins and Human Antidextrans.
`Purified BALB/c mouse myeloma proteins W3129 and QUPC 52 were approxi-
`mately 95% reactive with Sephadex G75, had two binding sites for [3H)IM7-OH
`per IgA monomer, and gave linear Scatchard plots indicating homogeneous bind-
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 5
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`
`440
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING SITES
`
`A. Analytical isoelectric focusing of 7-globulin (,yG) and purified antibodies from
`1 .
`FIG.
`subject 1. Antidextrans from 1 D5 ,_ eo were those eluted from Sephadex G75 by sequential
`extraction with IM3 (IM3 eluate 1, IM3 eluate 2-3, and IM3 eluate 4-6) then IM6 (IM6 eluate
`1-6) . The antilevan (L) from 1 D,,_ 8, and anti-blood group A antibodies (A) from 1 D- yG
`fraction of Ga1NAc eluate (79) are shown. Approximately 5.2 Ag N of all samples were applied
`to the gel . (B) Preparative isoelectric focusing of 10 mg 1 D6,-eo IM3 eluate 2-3 showing how
`fractions I to VII were collected. (C) Analytical isoelectric focusing of 1 D,,-,, IM3 eluate 2-3
`and fractions I to VII from B. Approximately 3.3 kg N of all samples were applied to the gel.
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`J. CISAR, E. A. KABAT, M. M. DORNER, AND J. LIAO
`441
`ing (Fig. 2 A), as did the heterogeneity indices of 1.0 from Sips plots (not shown)
`for protein QUPC 52 and 0.9 for W3129. Both proteins were mixtures of mono-
`meric and polymeric IgA, and the homogeneous binding shows that polymeriza-
`tion of IgA monomers does not alter the binding constants toward monovalent
`haptens. The binding constant of protein W3129 (K11 = 1 .0 x 105 M- ') was about
`10-fold greater than that of protein QUPC 52 (K11 = 8.4 x 103 M- ') .
`As expected from their isoelectric focusing patterns (Fig. 1 A), binding of
`[3H]IM7-OH by human antidextrans 1 D5,-1111 IMM 1 and 1 De,-s11 IMM 1-6 was
`heterogeneous as revealed by nonlinear Scatchard plots (Fig. 2 B) . From Sips
`
`Scatchard plots of equilibrium dialysis data at 25°C with ['Hlisomalthoheptitol . (A)
`FIG. 2.
`Protein W3129 (") at 10 .5 mg/ml, and protein QUPC 52 (O) at 20 .6 mg/ml. (B) Purified
`human antidextrans, 1 D_ IM3 eluate 1 (O) at 6.68 mg/ml, and 1 D,,_,o IM6 eluates 1-6 (")
`at 2.56 mg/ml. Calculations were done with a mol wt of 150,000 for myeloma proteins and
`human antidextrans .
`
`analyses (not shown) heterogeneity indexes of 0 .6 were calculated for both the
`IM3 and IM6 antibody . Association constants for 1 D5,-1111 IMM 1 (K11 =1 .1 x 105
`M- ') and 1 Ds,-611 IMM 1-6 (K11 =1 .8 x 105 M- ') differed slightly and were
`similar to the value obtained for myeloma protein W3129.
`Equilibrium Dialysis Displacement Studies with Myeloma Proteins W3129
`Association constants for isomaltose oligosaccharides and
`and QUPC 52.
`methyl aDglucoside were determined by measuring the abilities of unlabeled
`oligosaccharides to displace [3H]IM7-OH from the binding sites of proteins
`W3129 and QUPC 52. For both proteins, displacement curves with IM6 and IM7
`were the same as self displacement curves calculated (78) for [3H]IM7-OH and,
`thus, the association constants for IM6 and IM7 with proteins W3129 and QUPC
`52 are 1 .0 x 105 M- ' and 8.4 x 103 M- ' respectively. With each protein, a
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 7
`
`

`

`442
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING SITES
`
`displacement curve was calculated for a hypothetical competitor with K=1 M-1
`and thus a AF' = 0 cal/mol (8F0 = -2.303 RT log K), and this serves as a use-
`ful reference as the distance between it and the displacement curve of a given
`competitor is directly proportional to the AF' for the competitor .
`With protein W3129 (Fig . 3 A and Table II) over half of the binding energy for
`IM6 and IM7 is directed against methyl aDglucoside or IM2 which are similar.
`These are much less active than IM3 or IM4 which are equal and are bound
`almost as firmly as longer oligosaccharides. Isomaltopentaose is most efficient
`at displacing [3H ]IM7-OH' and even somewhat more active than IM6 or IM7.
`
`ISMALTOHEPTAOSE
`o ISOMALTOHEXAOSE
`ISOMALTOPENTAOSE
`a SOMA LTOTETRAOSE
`ISOMALTOTRIOSE
`A ISOMALTOSE
`¢ METHYL X D GLUCOSIDE
`
`IM 5
`IM 4
`o f
`` IM 3
`
`A
`
`A
`A
`
`X
`A d a
`Me DylX'
`
`Ms'
`IM 5
`1M 4
`1M 3
`MeelQgic
`
`e.4 X103
`5.9 X 103
`2.e X 103
`z0X 102
`'"1" 6 X 100
`
`i
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`~
`
`A
`
`1
`
`5
`m
`b 4
`_o
`
`3
`
`F
`
`Q
`
`F
`
`UOV
`
`0
`
`-40
`
`0
`
`+I .0
`
`-L0
`-3.0
`LOG FREE CONCENTRATION OF COMPETITOR (M)
`FIG. 3 . Equilibrium dialysis displacement at 25°C of ['Hlisomaltoheptitol by unlabeled
`isomaltose oligosaccharides and methyl aDglucoside. (A) Protein W3129 (10.5 mg/ml) with a
`concentration of ['H]isomaltoheptitol giving r = 0.62 in the absence of competitor . (B) Protein
`QUPC 52 (20.6 mg/ml) with a concentration of ['H]isomaltoheptitol giving r = 0.39 in the
`absence of competitor. The dashed displacement curve corresponds to a hypothetical
`competitor with Ke = 1 M- `. The dashed horizontal line signified the concentration of bound
`['H]isomaltoheptitol in the absence of competitor .
`
`Thus, while maximum complementarity is for IM5, 91% of the total binding
`energy is directed toward IM3 and 56% is for methyl aDglucoside.
`The pattern of displacement reactions for protein QUPC 52 (Fig. 3 B and Table
`II) were strikingly different than those of myeloma W3129. Most significant were
`the findings that displacement by methyl aDglucoside and IM2, which could not
`be studied at higher concentrations than those shown in Fig. 3 B, were close to
`the hypothetical displacement curve having K=1 M-1, and these competitors
`were bound at QUPC 52 sites with only about 5% of the total binding energy for
`IM6 or IM7 (Table II) . By contrast, IM3 was much more active and 72% of the
`total binding energy was directed against the trisaccharide. There were increases
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`.r
`
`_
`
`O F
`" F
`
`e
`
`. O
`.-~ p,
`
`F
`
`aC
`
`CO
`
`'o
`U A o .n
`w w
`
`.2
`
`Q~
`
`~
`
`M
`
`W
`
`~ ~ ~ S
`u G
`
`r,
`
`G0
`
`_
`
`F
`O
`
`y0
`
`d V
`
`S OMB
`
`rM- u°-~
`
`O O O O
`~f] O ~0 O
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`O O O_ O
`X X X X
`~=. o
`O
`
`c~S
`
`CD omc-
`oao'a
`
`_ F
`
`o '~ O
`a+
`O
`U FA
`
`OD
`G
`
`~
`
`A
`
`w
`4 v
`
`cN m
`
`O
`
`(V
`O
`7 v
`
`FOM . Or
`a."
`
`v
`
`;,
`
`E
`F
`0 0 `d w
`o F
`A
`
`U A
`
`CD A
`
`'y' C a
`
`O O O
`X X X
`o, o 0
`
`N
`O
`~ X
`ao
`
`O
`
`O N
`cc) ~o
`
`m wM 0C
`
`TL
`
`LV
`
`T
`N
`T
`c
`
`W is
`
`d U
`
`0 0 o
`
`S
`c- rvi r~
``
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`O O O O
`X X X X
`M O O N
`c-
`N .+ 1~ M
`
`dO
`
`N
`y
`a~ .O O . Oy
`- -O o
`
`O
`-Q t
`w u m o
`m
`tD CD CD T
`T
`T
`T
`0
`
`.
`
`id
`U
`m
`eon
`0
`
`F
`O
`
`eo
`F
`
`m
`
`wv
`
`FC
`
`N
`
`a
`
`Y
`
`Q
`
`Ca
`
`ro
`
`Ca
`
`.
`
`e
`v
`oa ~
`
`w
`I
`
`_ 0
`x
`
`~ c
`I
`I
`I
`
`0 0 0
`x x x
`.~ M N
`
`N O ~'
`Q) CZ) O
`
`VO' S ~
`CJ ~ N d'
`
`O
`~/
`
`000
`~
`
`Q L
`
`F
`
`raq
`A i0
`.~
`OL
`
`C
`
`G O
`7 O+ G
`U-D 8~
`w A
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`++
`- O O O O O
`X
`X X X X
`d; o c? ~ e;
`co v .. M
`o
`
`N El L
`'U `~
`vp
`41 .
`
`UP.
`
`O
`C~'
`
`ti
`T
`is
`
`s S~m~"'~ n
`
`s0.
`a
`
`R a
`
`ro
`a
`
`.
`
`d
`
`U
`
`wD
`
`T
`
`TOFW wO
`
`0a C
`
`7 WN
`
`S T a~0 t VO' N
`
`O O O O O O
`O <Y M CD t . d'
`C~J M M O (p o
`CD M M
`I
`1
`I
`
`O O O O O O
`X X X X X X
`cD u7 u; ., O c0,
`M N I oo I
`
`~0 (b M M ~
`
`S
`
`0 0 0 0 o 0
`o~fJ
`~
`~ N N N
`N [~ u] M M .y
`I
`i
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`0 0 0 0 0 0
`
`F
`O
`
`7
`.L
`
`w G
`A
`
`Gr. m
`d V
`
`en
`F
`TS
`
`F A
`
`C F
`C '~
`
`O ~
`O
`
`d U
`
`V
`w 'o
`w-
`"" O
`U
`p., A
`.C
`G .E
`
`o
`
`.
`
`F R
`
`a
`CV p
`o Y
`3 ;a
`F F
`
`SJ
`a
`
`dO
`
`O
`
`14,
`Q.
`
`"
`
`m
`C
`Tf
`
`d'
`OJ L~ a0 W
`M o~NN
`u~ a' c,
`I
`I
`I
`I
`O O O O
`O O
`X X X X X X
`d' O CA O O (O
`
`-
`
`g g a 6,
`
`O O S S O COD
`.~ c~
`ci
`N t` CO CD M M
`I
`+
`- O O O O O O
`xxxxxx
`c- ~ ~n ~r o 0
`.~
`.. co co co ao
`
`T W S S
`
`pO
`
`6° S
`
`w O cC F
`c'
`ov
`o a
`F
`U A N
`Cs . m
`d O
`
`o
`U A O A
`
`W is
`d U
`
`"
`
`EM
`bi
`
`_.
`
`o
`A U
`,I7
`c en
`C (y
`'sy xn
``-'
`
`a
`
`C
`
`O
`
`M
`
`0 d
`
`.
`
`d 0 C C
`
`X X X X X X
`O O N to fD O
`M '+ N N N m.
`
`s 88
`
`O O
`
`c= c~
`II
`
`O O
`
`X X
`to o
`C+J M
`
`O
`
`c+S
`I
`
`O
`
`x
`M
`O
`
`_ g
`O 'O
`
`F A
`
`- F
`O
`
`U a
`
`w m
`u
`4
`
`a
`
`row W
`
`O ' m
`M o W
`m F'" c
`C " O
`o
`Q U w
`{ZI a +-~
`
`d
`000 m
`O v
`N
`
`EOw
`
`N
`F
`V
`m
`
`7 E
`
`w
`
`F c6 C
`o
`'_
`° ~
`.G
`UA
`w Cd
`O
`Q
`
`O 7
`
`U A O
`
`, F
`
`W
`d V
`
`F.
`d
`o
`a.
`
`y Q
`" U
`
`F 00
`~r~
`m
`
`w
`TS Q
`EM
`00
`~A_
`
`o 0 0 0 oom
`Soo
`"~ "~ CD CD GV N
`t- n CO CO d' V'
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`0 0 0 0 0 0
`
`xxxxxx
`rt- Lq
`
`G To
`
`000 00
`LnLn °O
`cD P CO CD C er
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`O O O O O O
`
`-o
`
`~
`
`p b
`
`C- ~fJ e M N aA.,
`
`:U
`
`W
`o
`
`=
`
`o y
`F O
`F
`cp.
`F.
`
`a0 0U U
`D 00
`O
`
`T
`
`T
`
`oO
`TO
`
`C G
`v U
`F
`W F
`p O V
`V U y
`F
`
`Q O
`
`7b
`
`.No_.
`~csc~o o
`U
`wWWW
`M Pr.
`Co CV N
`
`wNw
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 9
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:9)
`
`444
`
`BINDING PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN COMBINING SITES
`
`in binding energy between IM3 and IM4 and from IM4 to IM5 . IM5 seemed to be
`slightly less active than IM6 or IM7 but this difference, although known to exist
`from inhibition studies (55) is so small that it probably is within experimental
`error in the present data. Thus, maximum complementarity is for the hexasac-
`charide, and while 72% of the total binding energy is for IM3, almost none of this
`can function in the binding of IM2 or methyl a D glucoside.
`Fluorescence Studies with Mouse Myeloma Proteins and Human Antidex-
`trans. The binding of isomaltose oligosaccharides and methyl a D glucoside by
`protein W3129 was associated with a quenching of the protein's fluorescence and
`Q,,,. values from several titrations varied from 16 to 20% with IM3 through IM7
`and from 20 to 23% with IM2 and methyl a D glucoside. The binding data (Fig. 4
`A) from fluorescence titrations are in good agreement with results from
`equilibrium dialysis displacement and from quantitative precipitin inhibition
`assays (Table U) . However, one difference was that IM5, IM6, and IM7 gave
`similar association constants in fluorescence titrations while in equilibrium
`dialysis displacement IM6 and IM7 were less active than IM5 . Both methods
`show that maximum binding occurs with IM5 and gave similar Ko values for its
`binding by protein W3129. Titrations with monomer and polymer fractions (not
`shown) gave the same results as with unfractionated W3129 and supported the
`previous conclusion that polymerization of IgA subunits does not effect binding
`of a monovalent hapten . Compounds other than isomaltose oligosaccharides also
`
`PROTEIN W.3129
`
`- PROTEINS W3082 and UPC61
`
`I
`-4 .0
`
`I
`-3,0
`LOG C (M)
`(A) Sips plots of data from fluorescence titrations at 25°C of dextran-specific
`FIG. 4 .
`myeloma protein W3129 with isomaltose oligosaccharides and methyl anglucoside (symbols
`as in Fig. 3) and of (B) fructosan-specific myeloma proteins W3082 and UPC 61 with IB (2 --.
`1)-linked fructose oligosaccharides (2FlG and 3F1G) and with sucrose. All proteins were at
`20 fag N/ml, and the excitation and emission wave lengths with W3129 were 280 and 345 nm
`respectively, and 285 and 345 nm respectively with W3082 and UPC 61 .
`
`1
`-2 .0
`
`1
`-I .0
`
`I
`0
`
`PGR2020-00009
`Pharmacosmos A/S v. American Regent, Inc.
`Petitioner Ex. 1033 - Page 10
`
`

`

`(cid:9)
`
`J. CISAR, E. A. KABAT, M. M. DORNER, AND J. LIAO
`
`445
`
`quenched the fluorescence of protein W3129, but with these it was often not
`possible to reach Q... . By using QMRX obtained from adding IM5, association
`constants were estimated for the a (1 -" 2), a (1 -" 3), and a (1-+ 4) -linked glucose
`disaccharides, kojibiose, nigerose, and maltose, respectively, as being between
`102 M-1 and 103 M- ', and were lower than those of IM2 and methyl aDglucoside.
`Methyl #Dglucoside, methyl aDglucoside, methyl aDmannoside, trehalose (aD-
`glucopyranosyl aDglucopyranoside) and glucose all had K,, values less than 5 x
`10' M- '. These findings emphasize the specificity which the W3129 site has for
`isomaltosyl structures. The binding of isomaltose oligosaccharides by protein
`QUPC 52 was not associated with a change in fluorescence .
`The fructosan-specific myeloma proteins W3082 and UPC 61 (55) were
`indistinguishable and had Qmax values from 6 to 9% with the tetrasaccharide
`MG, 5 to 7% with the trisaccharide 2F1G, and 10 to 13% with sucrose. Both
`proteins had association constants of 3.6 x 105 M- ' with 3FIG and 2F1G and 6.3
`x 102 M- ' with sucrose (Fig. 4 B and Table II) . Thus, 50% of the total binding
`energy was directed against the nonreducing, ,Q-linked, fructosyl unit of sucrose
`which represents the immunodominant group. The oligosaccharides 2FIG and
`3FIG present two and three fructosyl units respectively in # (2 , 1) linkage plus
`an additional ,B linkage and were similar, although earlier studies (55) showed
`that 3FIG was slightly more active than 2F1G (Table II) . In the fluorescence
`data this small difference would be expected to be within experimental error.
`Purified human antidextrans were then

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket