`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`STANDING ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSFER
`
`Henceforth, all parties who have filed motion(s) for inter-district transfer are required to
`
`provide the Court with a status report with respect to whether the motion(s) has been fully briefed
`
`and ready for resolution no later than six weeks prior to the date of the Markman hearing1 that
`
`is scheduled in that case.
`
`With respect to any parties who have such motion(s) pending at the time of the entry of
`
`this Standing Order and a Markman hearing scheduled for a date that is less than 6 weeks from
`
`the date of the entry of this Order, the Court ORDERS the party who has filed the motion to
`
`provide the same status report as quickly as is reasonable, but in no case more than five business
`
`days after the entry of this Order.
`
`When there is a pending inter-district transfer, the Court will either promptly enter an
`
`order resolving the pending motion(s) prior to the Markman hearing or it will postpone the Mark-
`
`man hearing until it has had the opportunity to do so. The Court will not conduct a Markman
`
`hearing until it has resolved the pending motion to transfer.
`
`A motion for inter-district transfer may be filed within eight weeks of the scheduled date
`
`for the Markman hearing only with a showing of good cause for any delay and leave of court.
`
` SIGNED March 23, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ALAN D ALBRIGHT
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1 To the extent there are multiple Markman hearings, the status report is due six weeks before the first scheduled
`Markman hearing.
`
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`BY: ________________________________
`
`FILED
`
`DEPUTY
`
`March 23, 2021
`
`Mark Borchardt
`
`
`
`MICROCHIP TECH. INC. - EXHIBIT 1013
`MICROCHIP TECH. INC. V. HD SILICON SOLS. - IPR2021-01265 - Page 001
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
