throbber
;
`
`I
`
`Neurology India (!M)
`v. 56 · n~ . 3 (Jul-Sept 2008)
`Genera, Collection
`It✓, NE:337D
`.:,-1.,' ) ·· ' .· 1-6, -w,)
`-
`')00'' " -
`J-2 .' ··•".:::-
`~ .,
`• v
`
`.
`
`)8
`
`ISSN - 0028-3886
`
`Official publication of Neurological Society of India
`
`.
`
`-·
`~,,.._.,,.
`
`/., ...
`
`.
`
`:
`:/ ,,.
`
`.,.ii
`
`•
`
`.
`
`.·'
`
`. · ·"
`i:c . '· '
`•. , .,
`I , .;
`f ~)''j
`. ·•
`
`' •
`

`
`
`
`'
`
`.
`. _..._,..,.
`
`'/:-'.
`
`,t-,[i·
`
`·,
`
`:·
`
`• #
`
`~~-
`
`r.::ii.lo.-.Ji.lL..li.l:oiol.:..--~----•-•·- ,.;.•·-'~-
`
`••-
`
`•-- -,-
`
`•
`
`.
`
`.
`
`•
`
`.
`
`,,;,.
`
`'!!>'
`
`•
`
`-
`
`/1!1·
`~ .N .
`,.f' a
`1 .
`
`•• • --"
`
`,
`
`. .
`
`. .. . . ..
`
`•-- - - - - • - - . . . . . : : : : ; : ,...
`
`www. neurologyindia. com
`
`i
`I
`
`.
`}_. ~ ~ ~ ; ' " 1 1
`
`'.)
`"
`~ f),}
`
`\ . / . ;
`
`l
`
`I
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`Published by Medknow Publications
`~
`._,,_ _______ ..,
`
`..-........... __ ,..__ -
`
`

`

`Neurology India
`
`Print ISSN· 0028-3886, E-ISSN. 1998-4022
`The Official journal of the Neurological Society of India
`
`Editor
`Alul Goel
`
`Associate Editors
`
`Dattalraya Muzumdar
`
`Executive Editor
`D. K. Sahu
`
`Members
`
`Kalyan Bhattacharya
`Rakesh Jalali
`Uday Mulhane
`Chilra Sarkar
`S. K. Shankar
`K. Sridhar
`
`Editorial Assistant
`
`Nilin Dange
`
`Immediate Past Editor
`Sudesh Prabhakar
`
`Past Editors
`R. G. Ginde
`Asoke K. Bagchi
`J. S. Chopra
`
`Kelan Desai
`Trimurti Nadkarni
`
`Asha Kishore
`U. K. Misra
`Manas Panigrahi
`P. Salish Chandra
`B. S. Sharma
`
`Anil P. Desai
`S. Kalyanaraman
`
`Aadil Chagla
`Sangeela Raval
`
`Sanjay Behari
`J. S. Kathpal
`J. M. K. Murthy
`Vedanlam Rajshekhar
`
`B. Ramamurthi
`P. N. Tandon
`
`Neurological Society of India
`
`(Executive Committee 2008)
`
`President
`President, Elect
`Honorary Secretary
`Honorary Treasurer
`Editor, Neurology India
`
`B. K. Misra
`V. K. Khosla
`B. S. Sharma
`Ravi Ramamurthi
`Atul Goel
`
`Past Presidents
`K. Ganapathy
`V. S. Mehta
`
`Executive Committee Members
`C. E. Deopujari (Neurosurgery)
`V. Rajshekhar (Neurosurgery)
`A. Narayanswamy (Neurology)
`K. Bhattacharya (Neurology)
`Chitra Sarkar (Allied)
`
`Neurology India is indexed with:
`Bioline International, CAB Abstracts,
`Caspur, CINAHL, DOAJ, EBSCO
`Publishing's Electronic Databases,
`Excerpta Medica / EMBASE,
`Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics
`JournalSeek, Global Health, Google
`Scholar, Health & Wellness Research
`Center, Health Reference Center
`Academic, Index Copernicus, Indian
`Science Abstracts, lndMed, Info Trac
`OneFile, Journal Citation Reports,
`MANTIS, Ne>'Jroscience Citation
`Index, PubMed/lndex Medicus,
`Science Citation Index, SCOPUS,
`SIIC databases, Ulrich's International
`Periodical Directory, Uncover and
`Web of Science.
`Issues are published quarterly in the
`months of March, June, September and
`December.
`All the rights are reserved. Apart from any
`fair dealing for the purposes of research
`or private study, or criticism or review, no
`part of the publication can be reproduced,
`stored, or transmitted, in any form or by
`any means, without the prior permission.
`
`Neurology India and/or its publisher cannot
`be held responsible for errors or for any
`consequences arising from the use of the
`infonmalion contained in this journal. The
`appearance of advertising or product infor(cid:173)
`mation in the various sections in the journal
`does not constitute an endorsement or
`approval by the journal and/or its publisher
`of the quality or value of the said product or
`of claims made for it by its manufacturer.
`
`The Journal is printed on acid free paper.
`
`Editorial Office:
`Department of Neurosurgery,
`f,eth G. S. Medical College and
`K. E. M. Hospital, Parel,
`Mumbai • 400012, India.
`Email: neurologyindia@medknow.com
`
`Published by:
`Medknow Publications Pvt. Ltd.
`A-109, Kanara Business Centre
`Ghat~opar (E), Mumbai - 400075, India
`Em;,iil: publishing@medknow.com
`
`Websites:
`wv.w.neurologyindia.com
`www.journalonweb.com/neuroindia
`www.bioline.org.br/ni
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Review Article
`
`Exon skipping and Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Hope,
`hype and how feasible?
`
`Steve D. Wilton, Susan Fletcher
`Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Molecular Genetic Therapy Group, University of Western Australia, Australia
`
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common
`and serious form of childhood muscle wasting is generally
`caused by protein-truncating mutations in the large DMD
`gene. Specific removal of an exon from a defective DMD
`gene transcript has the potential to allow synthesis of a
`semi-functional dystrophin, thereby reducing the severity and
`presumably progression of muscle wasting. The efficacy of
`this treatment will vary greatly between the different mutations
`that preclude the synthesis of a functional dystrophin .
`Restoration of the reading frame from a large multi-exon
`genomic deletion, typically greater than 36 exons, may lead
`to synthesis of a protein with only partial function and limited
`clinical benefit, whereas excising a nonsense mutation in a
`redundant exon should generate a near normal dystrophin.
`A clinical trial has recently confirmed proof-of-principle
`that exclusion of Exon 51 from human dystrophin mRNAs,
`carrying frame-shifting deletions adjacent to this exon, results
`in dystrophin expression. No major side-effects after local
`administration of the antisense oligomer were reported.
`Additional trials are underway, targeting the same exon
`but using an oligomer of different backbone chemistry. If
`functional dystrophin synthesis is demonstrated, and safety
`issues are addressed, subsequent trials will involve systemic '
`delive_ry .. Great chall~nges ~re ahead, some technical; ]
`establishing an effective delivery regimen, some ethical; I
`choosing subsequent targets for therapy, and others of an
`administrative and regulatory nature.
`
`Key words: Becker muscular dystrophy, clinical trials,
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy, exon skipping, morpholino
`oligomer, personalized genetic medicines
`
`.....
`
`~ac_kgroun_~
`
`Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD and
`1MD) arc allelic muscle wasting conditions arising
`'.>m mutations in the large DMD gene al Xp21.2.1 11 The
`
`most common, serious and progressive form, DMD,
`is caused by inactivation of the DMD gene product.
`Affected individuals appear normal al birth and clinical
`symptoms may be observed between the ages of two
`lo three years. Approximately soc,Vci of DMD males do
`nol walk until after the age of 18 months, and exhibit
`signs of retarded motor development, including a
`waddling gait, difficulty running and jumping and calf
`enlargement. Muscle wasting is relentlessly progressive
`in a symmetrical fashion, with joint contracturcs
`an important clinical sign. As the process of muscle
`regeneration becomes overwhelmed, regenerating fibers
`arc less frequent and the replacement with adipose and
`connective tissue contributes to pseudo-hypertrophy
`of some muscles. Affected individuals are typically
`non-ambulant by the age of 12 years, and in some
`cases as early as seven years (revicw,12-~ 1). Contracturcs
`develop as the disease progresses, and in the absence
`of optimal care, including corticosteroid treatment,
`physical therapy and nocturnal assisted venlilation,Pil
`most patients succumb lo the disease by the age of
`20 years as the result of respiratory and/or cardiac
`complications.
`In contrast, BMD patients present wilh a spectrum of
`SDVDrity, from liorderline DMD to asymptomatic.lfi, 71 It
`has lieen estimated that BMD occurs at only 1()% the
`incidc!nce or DMD, most likely through the inability
`to rncognize and diagnose particularly mild cases
`prior.111 Although many BMD individuals present with
`some symptoms bctwecm the ages of fivn to 15 years,
`by definition a IlMIJ patic!nt will rn111ai11 ambulanl until
`age 1Cl years or longer. Some patients dnspite a delc!tion
`within the dystrophin coding sequonc<!, present with
`no evidence of pathology, or nlnvaled sorum crnatine
`kinase, a sensitive marker of muscle damage.I'll
`The reading frame rule, proposed liy Monaco
`cl al., lends to hold trne for Llw majority of DMD
`and 13MD cases.l<J,WI Duclwnno muscular dystrophy-
`
`Professor Steve Wilton
`Molecular Genetic Therapy, University of Western Australia, Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Australian Neuromuscular Research Institute
`'
`4" Floor "A" Block, QE II Medical Centre, Ned/ands 6009, Western Australia . E-mail: swilton@meddent.uwa.edu.au
`
`254
`
`Neurology India I July-September 2008 I Vol 56 I Issue 3
`
`Th is mate-rial w;as co,pded
`at t he NLJMand m ay b e
`S;ubj ect US Copyright Law s
`
`

`

`Wilton, et al.: Exon skipping and DMD
`
`causing mutations, either frame-shifting deletions
`or duplications, nonsense mutations or splice motif
`errors lead lo the loss of a functional DMD gene
`product. Becker muscular dyslrophy typically results
`from in-frame deletions in lhe DMD gene lhal allow
`synthesis of an internally lruncalocl, lrnl functional
`
`prolein. 1'1•1111 The variation in severily reflects lhe
`extent and location of the deletion. Large mulli-exon
`deletions or the loss of crucial functional domains
`typically lead to the more severe phenotype, whereas
`loss of in-frame exons within Lhe cenlral rod domain
`appears lo have lillle or no consequences.1 11 ·151 The
`general rule is lhal lhe loss of 3G or more exons is
`associated with a severe phenotype, regardless of lhe
`reading frame, suggesting a minimum size for functional
`dyslrophin.l thl The lack of dyslrophin disrupts the
`link between the aclin cyloskelelon and basal lamina,
`compromising lhe sarcolemma (review,1 171). Dyslrophic
`muscle fibers are prone lo injury during force genera lion
`and repealed damage loads lo muscle loss and
`subsequent fibrosis.
`However, rare dyslrophin-positive fibers accumulate
`in muscles of many DMD patients and in animal
`models of muscular dystrophy.1rn•2111 This remarkable
`phenomenon is the result of naturally occurring
`allernalive dyslrophin lranscripls lhal bypass the
`DMD gene lesion. Although Lhe precise mechanism is
`unknown, lhe loss of multiple exons from the mRNA,
`flanking the DMD genomic deletion, has the polenlial
`lo restore the reading frame of the dystrophin transcript
`in the reverlanl fibcrsY1-2:q In the mdx mouse, an animal
`model of muscular dystrophy, this mechanism generated
`in-frame DMD gene transcripts missing multiple exons,
`typically 20 or more, including Exon 23 that contains
`the dyslrophin inactivating nonsense mulalion.12~1
`Tho skeletal muscle-specific dyslrophin isoform plays
`a crucial role, stabilizing the sarcolemmal171 through tho
`functional domains, the primary actin-binding silos al
`the amino terminal encoded by Exons 2, 4 and 5, and
`weak aclin binding between oxons 35 and 44, and tho
`cysleine rich ~-dystroglycan binding site encoded by
`Exons G2-G9Y 51 The central rod domain appears lo be
`variably dispensable, as demonstrated by the mutations
`in mildly aff cctod or asymptomatic BMD patients,liiJ
`and tho existence of naturally occurring rovorlanl
`fibers. Hence, a logical slralegy lo reduce the severity of
`DMD caused by dyslrophin-lruncaling mutations is lo
`manipulate primary gene transcript processing so as lo
`produce an in-frame mRNA capable of being translated
`into a functional BMD-likc prolein.1221
`
`Dystrophin: An Ideal Candidate for
`Transcript Manipulation
`
`Manipulation of dyslrophin pre-mRNA processing
`might appear a formidable challenge, considering the
`
`Neurology India I July-September 2008 I Vol 56 I Issue 3
`
`size and complexity of expression of this gene. The
`strategy demands lhal one or two oxons be excluded
`from a 2.4Mb DMD gene transcript during the
`simultaneous expression and processing of thousands
`of other gene lranscripls. However, many DMD gene
`features that have proved a challenge lo cell and gene
`replacement or repair therapies for DMD arc regarded
`as positive attributes for lranscripl manipulation,
`termed 'cxon skipping'.
`Tho DMD gene is the largest known and consists
`of 79 exons spanning some 2.4 Mbp,l 2
`GI much
`loo large lo be incorporated into viral vectors
`currently available for clinical applications. The
`wild type proloin-coding region is in excess of 11
`Kb, incompatible with the capacity of most viral
`vectors. Tho identification of a very mildly affected
`BMD patient with an in-frame deletion of almost
`half the gone prompted tho construction of a vector
`containing the dyslrophin "minigeno" ,127I Elegant
`studies have shown that multiple dyslrophin
`domains can be trimmed lo create microdystrophin
`-:1 111 Those constructs arc compatible
`isoforms.12 11
`wilh current viral vectors, lending impetus to gene
`replacement studies and confirming lhal there
`arc conditionally redundant domains within tho
`dyslrophin protein,t:l 1I Detailed studios have shown
`that restoration of micro-dystrophin expression al
`tho sarcolemma docs nol necessarily correlate with
`functional rescueY21
`Under the control of multiple promoters, tho
`predominant dyslrophin transcript is expressed in
`skeletal muscle as a malure 14 kb mRNA.l 1-25•:ni It has
`been eslimalcd that lG h elapse during the processing
`of a single dyslrophin pre-mRNA, during which lime
`79 cxons must be spliced from lhc primary gene
`transcript,1 141 Possibly because of this major effort in
`gene processing, tho mature DMD gone transcript is
`present at very low levels and has been estimated to
`only constitute 0.01-0.001 % of the total mRNAY51
`The full length transcript encodes a protein with four
`major domains and the reading frame is represonlod
`in cartoon form in Figure la. Tho most common type
`of dyslrophin mutation is a deletion of one or more
`exons, which may disrupt the reading frame with
`catastrophic consequcncos.1 10.:wJ However, nonsense
`mutations where a single base change alters a codon
`into a premature protoin-lerminalion signal [Figure
`lb], micro-insertions/deletions to disrupl the reading
`frame [Figure le] or nucleotide changes that disrupl
`prc-mRNA processing so that an cxon is lost, or
`inlronic sequences arc retained in the mature mRNA
`[Figure ld] have been reported. A BMD-like gone
`message is depicted in Figure le, where the removal
`of the "END" nonsense mu talion, or the "ND" frame(cid:173)
`shift bypasses the gene lesion, and permits the resl
`of the gene message lo bo translated.
`
`255
`
`Th is mat erial w as copcied
`at the NLM and maybe
`~ubject USCo pcyright Laws
`
`

`

`]
`
`...
`
`Wilton, et al.: Exon skipping and DMD
`
`: ,•!; !c.•.:., ,,~,; :,, .,
`
`)I.:,,_\;.:-:: ,?...:•>.<,_::,
`
`taJ~t)\111,11 i,t.,me <xpn:ssi1111 e1h:01l i11i,t •I Jys11 01>hin1lo111,11ns
`-<o,d---- - -- -~
`-
`[11,~_ljJibTndini - - --
`'i-J, ; ,._,!, ,•,.;: ;._;:, ,;..: ;..::, ,_: ,L,:
`,....
`;.;.:, ;.;,: , ;,.;.,: . ;,: ,;, ;,.;_:.; ;,..;:
`::c.\,iiml~aH
`'··············••rod - - - -- - -- - ~
`. ;", I.~ : -;.~ <.:•; , ;,;,::, ·,.:;.~ ~ :·,
`
`;., ;:, U.< O ~.;;, r. 1~: ;,..;:, ;·,:,.::
`
`,;,_;- . ~-•: ,..:~ ;,;~: ;~-•~• «.C l ;,,; 1::
`
`;·; ~ : IC~• ~:.:'-
`
`l bJ l'r ,mi.tl UI (." l\'ll lllllill ion tlu<: 10 ll{IIIS<."IISI.' UJU l t1 t i,11 1
`
`~~!lITjb~?:~lf~\;;.~ ;.:~ ~;..; ;.,.,:· ;;,\.: ;..:::, ,..:.:: ;.:,:• }~~:,~··:,··;_,:, ,..,_,
`
`.:..,:, ,.,.., ,L::, r;..: ;.: ,:
`
`,;..
`
`• ,.., P l<.'lllJIUf(." h!llllim11i,111 d ue- h) f1,1111l'-Sl1il\ , .... m,..~·,t I,~, dddi1l!I (.\.-\ !
`il~l'161ncfij)~ ------<od--·······
`,,:._; ~ .:..:.:. ,::-, ... ;,;,
`t.,. ::, ~ ... . •~=:- ,,;.; .:,.::, ,.:..; ... :'..-
`:-·! ,:.;.:_, ,:,;_. : .... J
`
`..: . : · ?:~:
`
`: ..... - •
`
`1d11'1 t'lll.:i1lm: !.:rm rn<1tion du,: 111 f1:1111t'-~l1it\ cilu~~·d b\· iB~l.'1tion. d 11ph.:a! i\,u c,1 ~l'li .. ·.: d.:frr1
`- - ---rod•··: ....... ~
`f;l~ti_ribjrid111~ -
`:,>, ~-; _:-:; ,•,.; ;.. ,:• r: •. ;. :• ;.;.,•, ;.:;:, ;.;,;, ,. ;: :~;;-: }:;;'._ ~~-:. :.;.
`
`: •!C _;~
`
`.
`
`. •
`
`;·.;, : ;... : ;.;. ;. ;:..;; : ;-
`
`Figure 1: Schematic representation of normal and defective dystrophin
`transcripts. Crucial functional domains, actin binding and the Cys(cid:173)
`rich ~·dystroglycan binding domains are represented by gray and
`black boxes respectively. DMD-causing mutations are indicated by
`underlining: (b) nonsense, (c) frame-shift deletion and (d) frame-shift
`insertion. An in-frame deletion, typical of BMD (underlined), and the goal
`of targeted exon skipping is shown (e)
`
`Targeted Exon Skipping
`
`Some 15 years ago, Kole and colleagues directed
`anlisens e oligomers (AOs) with 2'-O-melhyl modified
`bases on a phosphorolhioale backbone (2OMeAOs) lo
`cryptic splice silos that arose from inlronic mutations
`in the ~-globin geneY71 Upon masking the cryptic splice
`silo, Lhe splicing machinery defaulted to recognition of
`Lhe normal 13-globin splice silns. Induced clyslrophin
`exon skipping is similar in principle, except that
`normal splice motifs are largolod to mask tho oxon
`from the splicing machinery, lnading lo nxc;lusion of
`the exon from the mRNJ\. In this 111a11111:r, a 11011s1!11se
`mutation can be rnmov1:d or lhn rnading f'ramn can lw
`restored around d1!lolio11s or insnrlions in 1111! DMD
`gene transcript. Although 1:xo11 skippi11g is tlw most
`common consequenco of splic11 motif mulalio11s, so11w
`splice d efects lead lo llw activation of 011n or mor1:
`cryptic s plice sites.
`In Lh e golden rntrievor model of muscular dystrophy
`(GRMD),f:w1 Lhe majority of dyslrophin transcripts arn
`out-of-frame, sin ce the inlron G acceptor splice sile
`mutation result s in loss of Exon 7 from Lhe mature
`mRNA.J :rnr However, sensitive and specific PCR
`conditions detected near normal length dystrophin
`transcripts containing all bul Lhe first five bases of
`Exon 7 as some transcript s arose from the recognition
`of the first AG in Exon 7 .1-io1 Had this Lranscripl been
`in-frame , it is possible th a t the severity of the disease
`may have been mitigated somewhat in these dogs .
`Human dyslrophin splice site mutations and activation
`of cryptic splice sites have been reported, including one
`in intron 26 which appears lo have arisen inclopendenlly
`at least twice (www.dmd.nl).1-ii1
`
`256
`
`Th is materia I w as c.o,pied
`at t he N LM a.nd may be
`Soubject US Copy right Law s
`
`Early studies
`A 2'-O-me lhyl oligoribonucleolide was designed
`lo largel an internal motif in Exon 19 in a cell-free
`sys lem ,14 21 followed by skipping of dys lrophin Exon
`19 using an oligodeoxynucleolide in lymphoblasloid
`cells.1 431 Although the donor and acceptor sites were not
`targeted , these oligomers induced Exon 19 skipping .
`These oligomers mirnicked Lhe eff ecl of the Kobe DMD
`mutation, where an intra-exonic del e tion removed
`key splice recognition motifs and led lo the omission
`of Exon 19 from the gene transcript.lH,451 Analysis of
`Lhe Leiden Muscular Dystrophy Pages (www.dmd.nl)
`revealed that removal of one of only 12 exons should
`restore the reading frame in 75% of dyslrophin exon
`deletion patienls.1401 This group reported resloralion of
`the reading frame in a number of different normal and
`DMD patient cell lines, and mosl importantly, showed
`the generation of dyslrophin protein by Western blotting
`and immunofluoresccnt sludies.l47·51J
`We commenced dyslrophin exon skipping studies
`using Lhe mdx mouse,1521 an animal model carry ing a
`nonsense mulalion in dystrophin Exon 23. 15:11 Although
`Lhe mdx mouse is commonly referred Lo as a model of
`DMD, this is nol strictly accurate, since these animals
`do not present the severe muscle wasting seen in
`DMD boys. Despite this limitation, the mdx mouse
`offers an excellent molecular model of a dystrophin
`mu talion, and through detailed histological studies, il is
`apparent that the diaphragm develops severe dyslrophic
`pathology as the animal ages.1 541
`We Lransfcc ted three 2OMeAO cationic lipoplexes
`inlo primary mdx myogenic cells.1551 The scrambled
`AOs and Lh c oligomer directed al Lhe acceptor splice
`site had no delectable effect on dyslrophin pre-mRNA
`processing. However, the 20mer directed to the donor
`silo was able to induce Exon 23 skipping in a dose(cid:173)
`clr!pendenl manner. A series of overlapping AOs were
`subsequenlly designed lo both donor and acceptor sites
`and, whil1! llw acceptor remained an unresponsive
`largel, Lho officiency of exon skipping was improved
`by s1:l!:cling a 20mer targeted to the donor site_l5'WI The
`us11 of a block, co-polymor F127 resulted in functional
`amounts of dyslrophin uxprnssion in Lhu libialis
`anl nrior after intramuscular clolivory of llw same AO.1"'1f
`Ollwr formulations havu also lw11n shown lo onlwnco
`2OMeAO deliveryY,' 1 "1.1;21
`DNA oligonwrs arn of limited polonlial for induced
`exon skipping, since this cl10111islry induces [{Nase
`H ac tivity, leading lo mRNA degrndalion. Perhaps
`more signifi cantly, oligonwrs of lhis c lwmislry will
`be rapidly degraded by nuclemms .W11 Although 2OMe
`AOs have proved most effective, since !hoy are
`more nuclease resistant and do nol support RNaseH
`activity, several other oligonwr chomislries have
`bee n evaluated, including peptide nucleic acids
`(PNAs),fGHiq locked nucleic acids (LNAs),1" 1•071 2'-
`
`Neurology India I July-September 2008 I Vol 56 I Issue 3
`
`

`

`Wilton, et al.: Exon skipping and DMD
`
`1
`•
`;
`
`O-(2-Melhoxy)elh y l-moclifiecl (MOE)l 1; 01 and
`phosphorodiamidale morpholino oligomers (PMOs).
`1i;n.i;!iJ The PNAs were nol inilially rcporlcd lo be
`effcctive,1"4
`111 however, a rcccnl rcporl showed some
`exon skipping. 1G
`1>1 The LNAs induced robusl exon
`skipping, bul lhe exceedingly high Tm indicalcd great
`polcnlial for off-largcl effccls due lo cross-annealing lo
`rclalcd scqucnces,l 1
`HI This group reporled lhat PMOs
`were nol effective and lhal 2OMcAOs were the preferred
`chemistry for clinical application.
`
`effective systemic dystrophin resloralion.17111 Numerous
`peptides were screened in an elegant transgenic mouse
`model and the most promising candidate was then
`evaluated for delivery of the PMO targeted lo dyslrophin
`Exon 23 in the mdx mouse. There is no evidence of
`immune responses lo the peptides to dale (unpublished
`data), but further investigation into nonspecific or toxic
`eff ccls is ongoing.
`
`Target Site Selection and Oligomer Design
`
`Oligomer Delivery
`
`Al though in vilro uptake of 2OMeAO calionic lipoplexes
`into myogenic cells is efficient, these compounds have
`poor uptake in the absence of delivery reagents . To
`facilitate a comparison between 2OMcAOs and PMOs,
`we annealed a sense strand leash to the PMO, thereby
`allowing the duplex lo be complexed with a cationic
`liposome, before lransfection into cultured cclls.w11 IL
`became apparent thal while uncomplexcd PMOs were
`not taken up efficiently in vitro, PMO:leash:cationic
`lipoplcxes induced robust and sustained exon skipping.
`The PMO uptake by cultured cells after applicalion al
`high concenlralions and scrape loading to facilitate
`uptake has been rcportcd.1 701
`We reported that a single intramuscular injection of
`a PMO in saline was able lo induce strong dyslrophin
`expression, six weeks after administration.1 1;111 The
`compound, injected into 11-day-old mice before the
`peak of muscle degeneration al 18-21 days,1 711 was able
`lo prevent muscle breakdown, as evidenced by normal
`muscle morphology and a statistically significant
`reduction in fibers with central nucleation, a marker
`of muscle regeneration. Subsequent reports showed
`that systemic delivery of the PMO into the mdx
`mouse restored dystrophin expression in skeletal and
`smoolh muscle, although the heart was refractory to
`lrcatment.l1in.721
`A major improvement in the efficacy of exon skipping
`after systemic delivery was achieved through the use
`of J>MOs coupled to cell-penetrating peptidcs,17=1
`741
`The ability of PMO-pcptidc conjugates to induce exon
`skipping has been demonstrated in vitro, including
`human and mouse muscle explants,1 751 GR.MD canine
`model of muscular dystrophy17 61 and the mdx 4cv1 771
`mouse model (Milrpanl, unpublished data). Body(cid:173)
`wide dystrophin expression was restored in mdx mice
`by intraperitoneal administration of the PMO-cell(cid:173)
`penetraling peptide P007 conjugate as four, once-weekly
`doses of 5 mg/kg.1n1 Although exon skipping was not
`demonstrated in cardiac muscle, the reduction in
`skeletal muscle damage lowered the scrum creatinc
`kinase to near-normal levels. Recent development of a
`peptide that mediates PMO-induccd cxon skipping in
`cardiac muscle has removed the remaining barrier lo
`
`,
`
`Neurology India I July-September 2008 I Vol 561 Issue 3
`
`Although in vitro studies evaluating human dyslrophin
`exon skipping and work in animal models have proved
`promising, there are four major challenges lo exon
`skipping therapy for DMD that must be overcome.
`Achieving effective system delivery has been an obstacle
`lo many nucleic acid therapies, as is selection of an
`oligomcr chemistry that can safely induce sustained
`re-direction of dyslrophin expression after long-term
`administration. In addition, it will be necessary to
`design many different oligomers to restore the reading
`frame around mutations , including non-deletion
`mutations, across the DMD gene, and undertake safely
`and toxicology studies.
`The oligomers designed to excise selected dystrophin
`exons in three animal models of muscular dystrophy,
`mdx and mdx 4cv mice and the GRMD dog, have not
`provided us with any obvious parameters for optimal
`targeting. A donor splice site was most amenable when
`targeting Exon 23 for removal from the mdx mouse
`DMD gene transcript, while canine dystrophin Exons
`G and 8 were excised by oligomers directed to ESEs
`and the acceptor site respectively. Mouse dyslrophin
`Exons 52 and 53 could only be efficiently removed
`using a combinalion of two and three AOs respectively
`(unpublished data).
`Every dystrophin cxon, excluding the first and last,
`can be excised from the mature human DMD gene
`lranscript. Aartsma Rus and colleaguesl 47
`l reported on
`114 oligomers that were evaluated for the excision of
`35 dystrophin exons. We reported a preliminary draft
`of AO sequences capable of removing each human
`dystrophin exon and found that a substantial proportion
`of compounds could induce some exon skipping, albeit
`lo a variable degrcc.1rn1 Some AOs could induce readily
`detectable exon skipping after in vitro lransfcclion as
`lipoplcxes at concentrations of 10 nM, while others
`induced sporadic or very low levels of exon skipping
`after administration at 600 nM. Clearly, the most
`applicable compounds for the clinic will be those that
`are effective at the lowest concentrations, with more
`easily achievable therapeutic thresholds and lower risk
`of off-target eff ecls.
`We, and others have shown that an oligomcr
`may induce targeted exon skipping, even when the
`compound includes mismalches.1n4,no1 We demonstrated
`
`257
`
`This materia l \vascopie<l
`3tth,e NLM a n<! m 3y b.e
`:.ubj ect US Copyright L3WS
`
`

`

`Wilton, et al.: Exon skipping and DMD
`
`skipping of Exon 19 from th e human and mouse
`dystrophin lranscripls using mismatched AOs, lml only
`al high concentrations. Clearly, cross-reaction lo related
`sequences is a possibility and il will be mosl important
`lo design effective compounds Lhal excise lhe largol
`exon at low concentrations. We reported lhal displacing
`an oligomer by a few nucleotides dramatically alters
`exon skipping activily.1110-11 11
`Consequently, we have devoted considerable effort
`to design oligomers capable of inducing robust exon
`skipping at low concentrations, and it has become
`appare nt that targe ting obvious splice motifs will
`not guarantee induced exon skipping.'7'11 Despite
`early success in excluding Exon 23 from lhe mouse
`dystrophin mRNA by targeting the donor splice
`sile,'""."7 1 directing an oligomer lo the identical
`coordinates in the human DMD gene transcript had no
`effect on dyslrophin processing.11111 Indeed, the human
`donor splice sites are not generally preferred targets,
`with only lwo exons out of the 77 having donor splice
`sites as the optimal target motif17u1 and lhe majority of
`exons were efficiently removed by oligomers directed lo
`ESEs, intra exonic motifs that enhance exon recognition.
`A small number of exons that proved difficult lo remove
`showed satisfactory levels of exon skipping when
`targeted by combinations of oligomers.1112·1u1 The effect of
`AO cocktails is clearly synergistic, as particular AOs that
`are ineffective individually can induce exon skipping
`when applied al very low concentralions.1'111
`The AO length emerged as playing an important
`role in oligo design. In many cases, increasing the
`length from 25 lo 30 nucleotides conferred suhslanlial
`increases in exon skipping nfficinncy, far oulwnighing
`lhe additional cost synllll!sis. 11111 Increasing OIII! oligomnr
`from 25 lo 30 n11cleolid1:s incrnased nxon skipping
`efficiency fourfold,J1 11 1 howc!ver, oligonll!r 11:nglh must
`be determined on illl exon-by-1:xon basis. Inc:rnasing
`lhe length of the oligonwr targeting llw n1011s1:
`dyslrophin Exon 2:1 donor sit<: from 2!> lo :IO hasns was
`counterproductive. Our data suggests that Lill! optimal
`oligomcr length for exon skipping is lwtwc!nn 2:1 and
`30 nucleotides, rcgmdlnss of whether tlw 2OMn/\O or
`•11"1
`PMO chemistry is usecl.1 111
`
`Exon Skipping: Clinical Implementation
`
`In the first reported clinical trial of exon skipping
`for DMD, a DNA oligomer targe ted lo Exon 19 was
`administered intravenously lo a single DMD patient
`missing dyslrophin Exon 20. 11141 Despite showing
`appropriate dyslrophin exon skipping in lymphocytes,
`induced Exon 19 skipping and restoration of dyslrophin
`synthesis in muscle appeared equivocal. Several
`parameters could have conlriliuled lo this, including
`the nature of the oligomer chemistry, dosage, liming
`and duration of the regimen.
`
`More recently, a Phase Ia trial nol only addressed
`the primary safely concerns but also conclusively
`clemonstralecl restoration of dyslrophin expression in
`the most common subset of DMD deletion mutation
`palienls.11151 Intramuscular injection of a 2OMeAO
`(PRO051) targeted lo Exon 51 was carried out in
`four DMD individuals with different deletions in Lhe
`major mutation hotspot. Exci s ion of Exon 51 restored
`the reading frame in all participants, and dyslrophin
`expression was unequivocally demonstrated al the site
`of injection by immunofluornscence, Western blolling
`and RNA studies. A Phase I trial of a PMO targeting
`Exon 5111w1 is ongoing, and as yet, no data is available.
`This protocol differs from that by van Deulekom
`cl aJ.,1 1101 in terms of chemistry, oligomer sequence and
`largot muscle.
`
`Non-deletion Mutations
`
`Exon skipping development has focused on restoring
`the reading frame for the most common type of
`dyslrophin mutation: genomic deletions. Exon 51 was
`selected as the target for the first clinical trial , because
`removal of this exon would benefit a large percentage of
`DMD patients. However, exon skipping can lie applied
`lo other types of dyslrophin mutations, and perhaps it
`would be more accurate lo consider exon skipping as
`a generic platform of intervention for DMD. Although
`genomic deletions of one or more exons are the most
`common DMD-causing mutations, cases arising from
`exonic duplications, nonsense mutations, splice
`motif detects, micro-insertions or deletions may be
`more amenable to exon skipping. Aartsma-Rus and
`colleaguesl 1171 recently restored the reading frame in
`DMD patients with genomic duplications. If one copy
`of a single-exon duplication could be removed, the
`rnsultanl dyslrophin transcript should he translated
`inlo a normal protein. Although apparently simplistic,
`this may prove a technical challenge. It would appear
`that larg!!ling a duplicated exon generally rnsulls in the
`removal of both exons from the lranscripl, leading to
`disrnplion of tlw n:ading franHl unless additional exons
`arn rnmoved (Wilton, 11np11l>lishncl olisnrvatio11s).1'171
`Ceneralion of nor111al transcripts from ollwr ()MIJ
`dyslrophin gmws by solnclc!d nxon nxcl11sio11 is possihlc!.
`i'snudo-exon incorporntion in tho mature: ()Ml) ge1w
`transcript arisns from inlronic liascl changns which
`activate a set of cryptic splico motifs that nwd tlw
`criteria for nxon recog11ilio11. The 1:xc1lssivn intronic
`component of the IJMD gmw may conlrihule lo the
`incidence of pseudo-exons as a cause: of DMD, rnporled
`lo occur al a frequency of up to 4'¾1.1'1111 IJclspile tlw rarity
`of pseudo-exon inclusion, such mu lat ions arn perhaps
`ideal candidates for exon skipping, since 1!xcl11sion
`would result in a normal clyslrophin mRNA.1'1111
`We

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket