throbber
Volume 33, Number 5/6, May/June 2006
`
`Submit your manuscript online to hltp://cepp.manuscriptcentral.com
`
`and
`
`in h.allh and dlsea •• H liu
`
`approach to therapeutics SH Koo and
`
`Frontiers in Research Reviews: CuUlng-Edge
`Molecular Approaches to Therapeutics
`Introductioo WSF Wong and AJ Melendez
`480
`482 Monoclonal antibodies as targeting and therapeutic
`agents: Prospects for liver transplantation,
`hepatitis
`and h.patoc.llular
`ca",inoma JM luk and K-F Wong
`489 Human embryonic stem cells: Technological
`challenges
`toward.
`Ih.rapy SKW Oh and ABH Choo
`496 DNAmicroarray technology for targelldenlilication
`validation M Jayapal and AJ Melendez
`Short inlelering RNA(.iRNA) a. a nov.l th.rap.utic
`PN Pushparaj and AJ Melendez
`Filarial nematode secreted product ES·62 is an
`anti-inflammatory
`agenl: Therapeutic potential of
`small molecule derivatives and ES-62 peptide mimetics
`W Harnett and MM Harnett
`regulatory T c.lI.
`519 C04'C025'
`and BP leung
`Pharmacogenetics
`EJO lee
`From design to therapeutic
`533 Antisense oligonucleotides:
`application JHP Chan, S lim and WSF Wnng
`Therapeutic vaccination for central nervous system repair
`BT Ang, G Xu and IC Xlao
`DNA vaccines and allergic diseases KY Chua, T Huangfu and
`IN Liew
`Art and science of photodynamic
`MOiivo
`Polymeric core-shell nanoparticles
`Y-Y Yang, Y Wang, R Poweli and P Chan
`Proteomics Technology and Therapeutics MLW Hong,
`N Jiang, S Gopinath and FT Chew
`Targeting tumours by adoptive transfer of immune cells
`PA MacAry, CT Too and X Oai
`
`584
`
`511
`
`525
`
`541
`
`546
`
`551
`
`557
`
`563
`
`569
`
`407
`
`Brief Review
`Impact of obesity and insulin resistance on vasomotor
`lone: Nitric oxide and b.yond DW Stepp
`Original Articles
`r•• tor•• blood flow of
`415 Cytidin. 5'-dipho.phocholin.
`superior mesenteric and renal arteries and prolongs
`.urvival
`tim.
`In ha.morrhag.d
`anaesthetiz.d
`rat.
`MS Yilmaz, M Yalcln and Vsavel
`421 Blockade of p,- and Ilo-adr.noceptors delay. wound
`contraction and re-.pUhelialization in rat. BR SOUliJ,
`JS sanlOS and AMA Cosf!1
`431 Eff.cts of autonomic blockad. on non-Iin.ar
`cardiovascular
`variability
`indices in rats F Beckers,
`B VtIlheyden, D Ramaekers, B Swynghedauw and AE Aubert
`increases the gene expression
`448 Hyperinsulinaemia
`of .ndothelial nitric oxide syntha.e and Ih.
`pho.phatidylino.itoI3-k1na.e/Akt
`pathway in rat aorta
`H ToOO,E Gomyo, S Mlkl, TShimizu, A Yoshimura, R Inoue,
`N sawal, R Tsukamoto, J Asayama, M KoOOraand TNakala
`in rat aorta and
`44B Vasorelaxing eflects 01propranolol
`mesenteric artery: A role for nitric oxide and calcium
`entry blockad. FBM Privlero, CE TeiXEira,HAF Toque,
`MA Claudina, RC Webb, G De Nucci, A lanesco and E Anlunes
`·induced arterial hyperten.ion
`456 Ra" with inherited .tr ...
`(ISIAH.train) di.play .p.cilic quanlitativ.
`trail IDe;lor
`blood pr... ur. and lor body and kidney w.ight nn
`chromo.ome1
`OE Redina, NA Machanova, VM Elimov and
`AL Markei
`and aminophylline on tran.mitt.r
`465 Effect of th.ophyllin.
`release at the mammalian neuromuscular
`junction is
`nol m.diat.d
`by cAMP TJ Nickels, AD SChwartz, DE Blevins,
`J7Drummond, GW Reed and DF Wilson
`471 Dissociation of blood pressure and sympathetic activation
`of renin release in slnoaortic-denervated
`rats MH Krieger,
`-ED Moreira, EM Diiveira, VLL Oliveira, EM Krieger and JE Krieger
`Short Communication
`Spironolactone
`further
`reduces urinary albumin
`excretion and plasma B-type nalrioretic peptide
`levle.
`in hyperten.lv.
`type IIdiab.t •• tr.aled wilh
`angiotensin-converting
`enzyme inhibitor 5 Ogawa,
`K Takeuchi, T Mori, K Nako and S lio
`
`477
`
`search journal arllcles
`Visit www.blackw.lI-synergy.comlo
`and register
`lor lree table 01conlents email alerts
`
`therapy S Pervaiz and
`
`for therapeutics
`
`June 14,2006
`HEALTHSCIENCES
`LlBRARlES
`
`

`

`Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
`
`Editorial Board
`FI Achike
`fA Angus
`1:: Badoer
`L Beilin
`L Bennet
`K Berecek
`M Berndt
`A Bobik
`LM Burrell
`B Canny
`J Chalmers
`P Chan
`C Chen
`J-T Cheng
`JPF Chin-Dusting
`A Christopoulos
`AW Cowley
`B Cox
`RO Day
`L Delbridge
`K Denton
`R Di Nicolantcnio
`B Dreher
`X-J Du
`S Duffy
`G Dusting
`]-L Elghozi
`MEsler
`R Fraser
`J Funder
`JE Hall
`CHan
`M Hargreaves
`SB Harrap
`J Haynes
`JR Haywood
`G Head
`J Headrick
`H Iwao
`GL Jennings
`CI Johnston
`GAR Johnston
`RH Kennedy
`BAK Khalid
`B Kingwell
`
`Malaysia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`New Zealand
`USA
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Taiwan
`Australia
`Taiwan
`Australia
`Australia
`USA
`USA
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`France
`Australia
`UK
`Australia
`USA
`PRC
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`USA
`Australia
`Australia
`Japan
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`USA
`Mafaysia
`Australia
`
`Y Kobayashi
`K Koike
`JE Krieger
`DCY Kwan
`G Lambert
`R Lang
`D Laver
`YLLim
`Z Lu
`G Ludbrook
`J Ludbrook
`S Malpas
`RYK Man
`B McGrath
`EM McLachlan
`FAO Mendelsohn
`}P Monrani
`P Nambi
`A Nishiyama
`I Nishio
`P Pilowsky
`D Pollock
`U Proske
`AM Richards
`MG Rosa
`ASato
`JB Schnermann
`PM Sexton
`K Shimamoto
`CG Sobey
`M Srowasser
`R Summers
`S Sunano
`H Suzuki
`A Takeshita
`S Takishita
`M van den Buuse
`SW Watts
`R Widdop
`EM Wintour-Coghlan
`WSF Wong
`OL Woodman
`T Yao
`HCMYu
`
`Japan
`Japan
`Brazil
`Canada
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`PRe
`Australia
`Australia
`New Zealand
`Hong Kong
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Switzerland
`USA
`Japan
`Japan
`Australia
`USA
`Australia
`New Zealand
`Australia
`japan
`USA
`Australia
`Japan
`Australia
`Australia
`Australia
`Japan
`japan
`Japan
`Japan
`Australia
`USA
`Australia
`Australia
`Singapore
`Australia
`PRC
`Hong Kong
`
`Editor-in-Chief
`Warwick P Anderson
`School of Biomedical Sciences
`Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
`Regional Editor - China
`Ding Feng Su
`Department of Pharmacology
`Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, PRe
`Regional Editor - Japan
`Yukio Yarnori
`International Center for Research on Primary
`Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, Kyoto, Japan
`Regional Editor - North America
`Greg Fink
`Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology
`Michigan
`State University, Michigan,
`USA
`Advising Editors
`Hypertension:
`Judith Whitworth
`John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra,
`Australia
`Bevyn Jarrott
`Pharmacology:
`Howard Florey Institute, University of Melbourne,
`Melbourne, Australia
`Physiology: Roger Evans
`of Physiology, Monash University,
`Deparrmenr
`Melbourne, Australia
`Society Editors
`ANS: Paul Martin
`National Vision Research Institute of Australia,
`Melbourne, Australia
`AuPS: Dave Davey
`Department of Physiology, University of Sydney,
`Sydney, Australia
`ASCEPT: Roselyn Rose'meyer
`School of Health Sciences, Griffith University,
`Gold Coast, Australia
`
`L,~,,Editorial Office Administrator
`
`Georgina Nunn cepp@asia.blackwellpublishing.com
`
`This journal
`
`is also published online at www.blackwell-synergy.com
`
`Aims and Scope; Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
`(CEPP) provides a medium for the rapid publication of original
`research
`papers, shan communications,
`rapid communications
`and theoretical articles
`(hyporheses) on the results of clinical and experimental work in pharmacology and
`physiology. Invited review articles are published occasionally. CEPP aims to
`make a substantial contribution ro effective and productive communication
`between scientists throughout
`the world who are working in these interrelared
`disciplines. Papers accepred become copyright of the Journal. CEPP has been
`by the High Blood Pressure Research Council of Australia and the
`adopred
`Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and
`Australasian
`Toxicologists.
`All papers are reviewed by at
`submitted paper.
`
`least rwo investigators expert
`
`in the field of the
`
`is covered by B[OSIS
`Abstracting and Indexing Services: This journal
`Database, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, CancerLIT, Chemical
`Abstracts Service, Current Contents/Life Sciences, Elsevier Bl OBASEICurrellt
`Awareness in Biological Sciences, EMBASEIExcerpta Medica,
`Inpharma Weekly,
`Journafs@Ovid, Medical Documentation
`Service, MEDLINE,
`Reactions Wleekly,
`Reference Update, Research Alert, Science Citation Index, SciSearch, Toxicology
`Abstracts, UnCover and University Microfilms.
`
`Address for Editorial Correspondence; Editorial office, CEPP, Department
`of Physiology, PO Box 13F, Monash University Victoria 3800, Australia.
`Tel; + 61 3 9515 0059, Fax: + 61 3 9589 4355.
`
`Disclaimer: The Publisher and Editors cannot be held responsible for errors
`or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in rhis
`journal;
`the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily refleer those
`of the Publisher and Editors, neither does the publication of advertisements
`constitute any endorsement by the Publisher and Editors of the products
`advertised.
`
`© 2006 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pry Ltd.
`
`ISSN 0305-1870 (Print)
`ISSN 1440-1681 (Online)
`
`For submission instructions, subscription and all other information visit
`www.blackwellpublishing.comlcep
`This journal is available online at Blackwell Synergy. Visit www.blackwell-synergycom to search the articles and register for
`table of contents email alerts.
`
`CEP.]EB.]an06
`
`

`

`Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology
`
`and Physiology
`
`(2006) 33, 533-540
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Frontiers in Research Review: Cutting-Edge Molecular Approaches to Therapeutics
`
`FROM DESIGN TO
`ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES:
`THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION
`
`Jasmine HP Chan, Shuhui Lim and WS Fred Wong
`Department of Pharmacology,
`Yang Loa Lin School of Medicine and Immunology Program,
`National University of Singapore, Singapore
`
`SUMMARY
`
`strand
`is a short
`(ASO)
`oligonucleotide
`1. An antisense
`of deoxyribonucleotide
`analogue that hybridizes with the com-
`plementary mRNA in a sequence-specific manner via Watson-
`Crick base pairing. Formation of the ASQ-mRNA heteroduplex
`either triggers RNase H activity, leading to mRNA degradation,
`induces
`translatio_nal arrest by steric hindrance
`of ribosomal
`activity, interferes with mRNA maturation
`by inhibiting splicing
`or destabilizes
`pre-mRNA in the nucleus,
`resulting
`in down-
`regulation of target protein expression.
`tool in protein
`2. The ASO is not only a useful experimental
`target
`identification
`and validation, but also a highly selective
`therapeutic
`strategy
`for diseases with dysregulated
`protein
`expression.
`theoretical
`various
`review, we discuss
`3. In the present
`approaches
`to rational design of ASO, chemical modifications of
`ASO, ASO delivery systems and ASO-related toxicology. Finally,
`we survey ASO drugs in various current
`clinical studies.
`Key words:
`antisense oligonucleotide design, cell-penetrating
`peptide, dendrimer, gapmer antisense oligonucleotide,
`liposome,
`locked nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, phosphoroamidate
`morpholino oligomer, phosphorothioate, RNase H.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`An antisense oligonucleotide
`deoxyribo-
`(ASO) is a single-stranded
`nucleotide (typically 20 bp in length) that
`is complementary
`to the
`target mRNA Hybridization of ASO to the target mRNA via Watson-
`Crick base pairing can result in specific inhibition of gene expression
`by various mechanisms, depending on the chemical make-up of the
`ASO and location of hybridization,
`resulting in reduced levels of
`translation of the target
`transcript.' The ASO is not only a useful
`
`Correspondence:WS Fred Wong,Department of Pharmacology,YongLoo
`Lin School of Medicine, National Universityof Singapore, 1v1D218Medical
`Drive, Singapore 117597. Email: phcwongf@nus.edu.sg
`This paper has been peer reviewed.
`Received 18 October; revision 1 February 2006; accepted 5 February
`2006.
`e 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
`
`function and target validation, but
`tool for studies of loss-of-gene
`therapeutic
`strategy to treat any
`also highly valuable
`as a novel
`disease that
`is linked to dysregulated
`gene expression. Antisense
`oligonucleotide-induced
`protein knockdown is usually achieved by
`induction of RNase H endonuclease
`activity that cleaves the RNA-
`DNA heteroduplex. This leads to the degradation of target mRNA
`include
`while leaving the ASO intact.' Other ASO mechanisms
`translational
`arrest by steric hindrance
`of ribosomal
`activity,
`interference with mRNA maturation
`by inhibiting
`splicing and
`destabilization
`ofpre-mRNA in the nucleus'
`(Fig. 1).
`algo-
`In the present
`review, we first discuss a few computational
`rithms in ASO design. There are other screening strategies to obtain
`potent ASO, such as mRNA walking," oligonucleotide
`array
`and
`RNase H mapping," but these approaches are more costly and labour
`intensive and require expensive automation equipment
`that many
`small laboratories may not be able to afford. Rational design of ASO
`that are freely available in the
`based on computational
`algorithms
`public domain is the most economical
`approach
`to ASO design
`and very often generates potent ASO from a handful of candidates.
`Because there is no stand-alone program in predicting highly potent
`ASO, one can increase the 'hit rate' using several computer software
`packages.· Unmodified ASOs
`are susceptible
`to degradation
`by
`nucleases. Therefore, different chemical modifications of ASO have
`been developed
`to decrease nuclease
`cleavage
`and increase
`the
`biostability
`and potency of the ASo. We then discuss
`the latest
`approaches
`for ASO delivery in vitro and in vivo. Owing to inherent
`ionic charges of ASO, it is difficult for the ASO to cross the plasma
`membrane
`efficiently. As such,
`the ASO needs to be coupled to a
`carrier
`for efficient membrane binding and internalization. Finally,
`toxicology and clinical studies of ASOs are discussed.
`
`ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDE DESIGN
`The strength and stability of interactions between the ASO and com-
`plementary target mRNA depends on factors such as thermodynamic
`stability,
`the secondary structure of the target mRNA transcript and
`the proximity of the hybridization
`site to functional motifs on the
`designated transcript,
`such as the 5' CAP region or translational
`start
`site. We need to consider at least four parameters
`in ASO design in
`(i) prediction
`order
`to increase
`the 'hit
`rate':
`of the secondary
`structure of the RNA; (ii) identification of preferable RNA secondary
`local structures;
`(iii) motifs searching and GC content calculation;
`and (iv) binding energy (6.Go37) prediction.
`
`

`

`534
`
`List of abbreviations:
`
`ASO
`DOPE
`LNA
`2'-MOE
`
`Antisense oligonucleotide
`Dioleyphosphatidylethanolamine
`Locked nucleic acid
`2'~O-Methoxyethyl
`
`JHP Chan et aL
`
`2'-OMe
`PMO
`PNA
`PS
`
`2' -O·Methyl
`Phosphoroamidate morpholino oligomer
`Peptide nucleic acid
`Phosphorothioate
`
`Nucleus
`
`Pre.mRNA ""l'"
`
`,.1, 11!;' "#WV'!!
`
`'.)~'!-it')h'_'JJ),.
`
`Ii!;
`
`1 Transcription
`1Post-transcriptional
`
`modification
`3' poly(A)
`!III: I:! 11!!I'!!:! AhAA
`
`tail
`
`~~~~
`
`5' cap
`I,,!
`
`--....:::,~~+~"~&;,.!"",'*'F!'.,,Jb4~1JJ,~"tm••!
`1
`1
`
`(4)
`Inhibition of
`5'cap
`formation
`
`(5)
`Inhibition of
`RNA
`splicing
`
`(6)
`Activation
`of RNase H
`
`Hybridization
`"!!rII!!:!!!!!!!;!!!.AAAAA --....,;;::..---
`
`ITranslali":n-
`
`Target protein
`
`608 ribosomal
`• "(I;~"'~illlllllis~UjbUnit p.AAAA
`
`408 ribosomal
`sutiunit
`(1) Normal prolein
`translation
`
`AAAAA
`WII!!!!!!:!!!
`Formation of ASQ-mRNA heteroduplex
`
`::: ~,.
`
`~!!!! II:I:IIll!;!!
`
`I]' I
`
`•
`
`RNase H
`
`(2) Activation of RNase H
`
`(3) Steric hinderance of
`ribosomal subunit binding
`
`In the absence of ASO, normal gene and protein expression is maintained. The ASQ is taken
`(ASOs).
`Fig. 1 Modes of action of antisense oligonucleotides
`up by cellular endocytosis and can hybridize with target mRNA in the cytoplasm. Formation ofanASo-mRNA
`heteroduplex induces (2) activation of RNase
`H, leading to selective degradation of bound mRNA or (3) steric interference of ribosomal assembly. Both actions will result
`in target protein knockdown.
`Alternatively,
`the ASO can enter the nucleus and regulate mRNA maturation
`by (4) inhibition of 5' cap formation,
`(5) inhibition ofmRNA splicing and
`(6) activation of RNase H. Theoretically,
`the ASO can selectively knock down any target gene and protein expression,
`leading to therapeutic benefit.
`
`Prediction
`
`of the secondary
`
`structnre
`
`of RNA
`
`that effective ASO design depends on
`accepted
`It is generally
`accurate prediction of the secondary structure of the RNAY How-
`ever, a truly reliable algorithm to predict any single rnRNA secondary
`structure and folding pattern is lacking. A widely used mfold program
`is available
`in the public domain
`(http://www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/
`applications/mfold)
`that predicts all possible optimal and suboptimal
`sequence of mRNA. The core algorithm
`structures of a particular
`predicts overall minimum free energy, aG, of different possible
`folding." Conversely, another commonly used computer algorithm
`is the sfold program (http://sfold.wardsworth.org/index.pl),
`which
`
`transcript."
`predicts only the best secondary structure of the target
`Using a combination of both mfold and sfold, one can determine the
`most frequently occurring secondary structure of the target mRNA
`with minimal overall free energy as a potential ASO target site.
`
`of preferable mRNA local secondary
`
`Identification
`structures
`An effective ASO should be designed at the regions where mRNA
`is accessible
`for hybridization.':"
`Local
`structures
`accessible
`to
`ASOs are those usually located at the terminal end, intemalloops,
`joint
`sequences, hairpins
`and bulges of 10 or more consecutive
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pry Ltd
`
`

`

`Antisense oligonucleotide
`
`535
`
`In conjunction with mfold, a new software (Target-
`nucleotides."
`Finder; http://www.bioit.org.cru.ao!targetfinder.com)
`has
`recently
`been developed to facilitate ASO target site selection based on the
`method of mRNA accessible
`site tagging (.MAST).13 Yang et at. 14
`have recently demonstrated that potentASO target sites can be found
`in highly conserved local motifs, whereas ASO targeting at variable
`local motifs may lead to non-sequence
`specific effects. Therefore,
`in order to increase the 'hit rate' of potent ASO design, one needs
`to look for locally conserved structures among various optimal and
`suboptimal mRNA predicted secondary structures.
`
`and GC content calcnlation
`Motifs determination
`the accessible
`conserved
`local
`secondary
`After confirmation
`of
`structures and the corresponding
`sequences of ASOs (approximately
`20 bp), one can settle on some well-defined activity enhancing motifs
`and discard those activity decreasing motifs in theASOs.
`15 Matveeva
`et al. 15 analysed data collected from> 1000 experiments using phos-
`phorothioate
`(PS)~modified ASOs and found a positive correlation
`between ASO-mediated
`mRNA knockdown
`and the presence
`of CCAC, TCCC, ACTC, GCCA and CTCT motifs in the ASOs.
`Conversely,
`the presence ofGGGO (O-quartets
`formation), ACTG,
`AAA and TAA motifs in ASOs weakened ASO activity. Although
`it is believed that
`the formation of the ASO-mRNA heteroduplex
`stimulates Rlqase H activity,
`leading to target mRNA degradation,
`Ho et al. J6 found that RNase H activity is sequence independent.
`Instead, GC content
`is strongly correlated with the thermodynamic
`stability of the ASO-mRNA duplexes and RNase H activity. Ho et al. 16
`observed strong ASO effects with a minimum of 11 G or C residues
`PC?Of inhibition was observed
`in 20 bp ASOs, whereas
`by ASOs
`having nine or fewer G or C residues.
`
`Binding energy (aGo 37) prediction
`
`to take into consideration
`also needs
`Successful ASO design
`thermodynamic
`energy. Software
`for calculating
`thermodynamic
`properties between the ASO and mRNA target sequence is available. 17
`The program OligoWalk from the package RNAstructure 3.5 (http://
`has been developed to calculate
`128. 151. 176.70/RNAstructure.html)
`binding energy of ASOI ASO and ASO/mRNA.
`To design a potent
`ASO, the binding energy between the ASO and mRNA should be
`AGo37~ -8 kcallmol, whereas the energy for binding betweenASOs
`should be LiO°37 ~ -1.1 kcallmol.
`J5 By using two large databases
`from ISIS Pharmaceuticals
`(Carlshad, CA, USA) and the puhlished
`literature, Matveeve et al. 18 showed that the hit rate of developing a
`potent and active ASO is six- and threefold higher,
`respectively,
`if
`the above criteria are met. In addition, by using this algorithm alone,
`Fei and Zhang" were able to design ASO for the downregulation
`of
`vascular endothelial growth factor protein expression with a success
`rate higher
`than 85%.
`a tedious ASO design approach using multiple
`To circumvent
`computer algorithms, a fast and handy ASO prediction based on a
`neural network has been developed
`using on a broad range of
`parameters,
`including base composition, RNA-ASO binding energy,
`RNA-ASO terminal properties, ASO-ASO binding properties
`and
`10 verified sequence motifs correlated with efficacy and Rnase H
`accessibilities." The prediction server interface is available at http://
`www.cgb.ki.se/AOpredict. Although this model can predict effective
`ASOs with> 50% gene-expression
`inhibition with a success rate of
`
`92%, some effective sequences may be missed because the selective
`there is a lack
`criteria of this program are too stringent. Furthermore,
`ofthermodynamic
`consideration in this network in correlating dimer
`energy with efficacy.
`algorithm to accu-
`In conclusion,
`there is no reliable stand-alone
`rately predict ASO. Inpractice, ASOs have to be tried and screened, so
`that some companies,
`such as ISIS Pharmaceuticals,
`have performed
`gene-walking and have screened hundreds of ASOs against one gene.
`Using this linear 'shot-gun' approach, only 2-5% ofthe oligonucleo-
`tides are generally found to be potent ASOs.4 However, by combining
`the above theoretical criteria using multiple computational algorithms,
`one can markedly increase the hit rate of highly potent ASOs.
`
`CHEMICAL MODIFICATIONS
`
`OF ASO
`
`An unmodified ASO is rapidly attacked by all types of nucleases in
`biological
`fluid and its overall charged property prevents it from
`penetrating through the cell membrane. Various chemical modifications
`have been developed to enhance nuclease resistance, prolong tissue
`half-life,
`increase
`affinity and potency and reduce non-sequence-
`specific toxicity (Fig. 2).
`
`First-generation ASOs
`
`First generation ASOs are those containing a PS-modified backbone,
`in which one of the non-bridging oxygen atoms in the phosphodiester
`bond is replaced by a sulphur atom." Phosphorothioate modification
`confers higher resistance to the ASO against nuclease degradation, lead-
`ing to higher bioavailability of the oligonucleotide. Phosphorothioate-
`modified ASOs promote RNase
`Il-mediated
`cleavage of target
`mRNA. However,
`this modification may slightly reduce the affinity
`of the ASO for its mRNA target because the melting temperature
`of the ASo-mRNA heteroduplex decreases by approximately 0.5°C
`per nucleotide."
`Phosphorothioate-modified
`ASOs have also been
`reported to produce non-specific
`effects by interactions with cell
`surface and intracellular proteins.' Despite these disadvantages, PS
`modification
`is the most widely performed
`chemical modification
`of ASOs for loss-of- function studies in vitro and in vivo for gene
`target identification and validation.
`Indeed,
`intravitreous
`fomivirsen,
`a 21 bp first generation PS-modifiedASO,
`is currently the only ASO
`drug approved for clinical use."
`
`Second-generation ASOs
`
`To further enhance nuclease resistance and increase binding affinity
`for target mRNA, second-generationASOs with 2'-alkyl modifications
`of the ribose were developed.
`2'-O-Methyl
`(2'-OMe)
`and 2'-0-
`Methoxyetbyl
`(2' -MOE) modifications ofPS-modified ASOs are the
`two most widely studied second-generation ASOs. I Unexpectedly,
`2' -OMe and 2'-MOE substitutions do not support RNase Il-mediated
`cleavage of target mRNA, which dampens the efficacy of the ASo. 24
`To circumvent
`this shortcoming,
`a chimeric ASO was developed in
`which
`a central
`'gap'
`region consisting
`of approximately
`10
`PS-modified
`2' -deoxynucleotides
`is flanked on both sides (5' and 3'
`directions) by approximately five nucleotide
`'wings'. The wings are
`composed of 2' -OMe or 2'-MOE PS-modified
`nucleotides." This
`chimeric 'gapmer' ASO allows RNase H to sit in the central gap to
`execute target-specific mRNA degradation; meanwhile,
`the 'wings'
`resist nuclease
`cleavage of ASO by 2' -alkyl modifications
`at both
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
`
`

`

`JHP Chan et a1.
`
`2'.fluoro-arabino nucleic acid
`(FANA)
`
`-'(rB
`
`'"
`
`NI°I
`
`..-
`O=~-N <,
`
`0"
`Phosphoroamldale Morpholino
`(PMO)
`
`N3'·PS' Phosphoroamldate
`(NP)
`
`l;;;t'
`
`~ °
`
`O=p-o-
`
`I0
`
`"
`Locked
`
`nucjetc
`(LNA)
`
`acid
`
`·'~)::r
`
`"
`
`,
`"J+o~ase
`II',.~
`
`536
`
`'O~'
`
`H
`
`~
`
`0=)-8-
`0"
`PhosphorottlJoate
`(PS)
`
`DNA
`
`-cr~ ~
`
`0='1-0-
`
`CHs
`
`0"
`2'-D-methyl
`(OMe)
`
`RNA
`
`'~'"

`
`I
`O=P-O-
`
`I0
`

`
`'A
`
`O-CH~
`
`"
`2'-O·methoxy-ethyl
`(MOE)
`
`RNA
`
`~O=p-o-
`I0,
`
`nucleic acid
`Cycloheltene
`{CeNAl
`
`~
`Q=P-O-
`I°"
`
`Tricyclo-ONA
`(leONA)
`
`Peptide nucleic acid
`(PNA)
`
`Fig. 2 Chemical modifications of
`antisense oligonucleotides.
`
`ends. Extensive studies have been performed in vivo to assess the
`stability and toxicity of these modified ASOS.1,26
`
`Third-generation ASOs
`
`To further enhance target affinity, nuclease resistance, biostability
`and pharmacokinetics,
`a third generation of ASO was developed
`mainly by chemical modifications of the furanose ring of the
`nucleotide. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acid (LNA)
`and phosphoroamidate morpholino oligomer
`(PMO) are the three
`most studied third-generation ASOS.3,27
`Peptide nucleic acid is a synthetic DNA mimic in which the
`phosphodiester backbone is replaced with a flexible pseudopeptide
`polymer
`(N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine)
`and nucleobases are attached to
`the backbone via methylene carbonyl bnkage.":"
`Peptide nucleic
`acid is a non-charged
`nucleotide
`analogue
`that can hybridize
`complementary DNA or RNA with higher affinity and specificity
`than unmodified DNA-DNA and DNA-RNA duplexes. Inaddition,
`PNA demonstrates high biostability in biological
`fluid because it is
`not degraded by nucleases or peptidases. Peptide nucleic acid exerts its
`antisense effect by fanning a sequence-specific duplex with mRNA,
`which mainly causes steric hindrance of translational machinery
`leading to protein knockdown because it is not a substrate for RNase
`H. Furthermore, PNA can elicit anti gene effects by hybridizing with
`double-stranded DNA in four possible configurations,
`including
`triplex, triplex invasion, duplex invasion and double duplex invasion,29,3o
`resulting in transcriptional arrest. Substantial data have revealed the
`effectiveness of PNA in gene silencing in various ex vivo models
`and in genetic and cytogenetic analyses,":"
`but its efficacy in vivo
`remains to be determined.
`restricted nucleotide
`Locked nucleic acid is a conformationally
`containing a 2'-0,4' -C-methylene bridge in the j3-D-ribofuranosyl
`configuration. This modification greatly enhances its hybridization
`affinity towards -target mRNA and DNA, with a substantial
`increase
`
`in the thermal stability of the duplexes." Inaddition, LNA is resistant
`to nuclease degradation. Like any 2'-0 ribose modification, LNA is not
`a substrate for RNase H. Notwithstanding, LNA monomer can be freely
`incorporated into RNA and DNA to form chimeric oligonucleotides
`resulting in restoration of RNase H-mediated cleavage of mRNA.
`It has been shown that the chimeric LNAIDNA/LNA gapmer with
`seven to 10 PS-modified DNA central gaps flanked by three to four
`LNA oligomers on both ends provides highly efficient mRNA cleavage,
`in addition to high ASO potency,
`target accessibility and nuclease
`resistance." Among the nine members of the LNA molecular
`family,
`u-L-LNA is the stereoisomer
`of j3-D-LN~ and has been shown
`to demonstrate
`the highest efficacy in rnRNA knockdown
`in both
`in vitro and in vivo studies, making it one of the most promising
`LNA antisense agents.":"
`Phosphoroamidate morpholino oligomer represents a non-charged
`ASO agent in which the ribose sugar is replaced by a six-membered
`morpholino ring and the phosphodiester bond is replaced by a phos-
`phoroamidate
`linkage."
`Phosphoroamidate morpholino
`oligomer
`does not support RNaes H activity,
`such that
`its ASO effect
`is
`primarily mediated by steric interference
`of ribosomal
`assembly
`resulting -in translational
`arrest. This chemical modification
`also
`confers excellent resistance to nucleases and proteases in biological
`fluid. Phosphoroamidate morpholino oligomer does not readily enter
`mammalian cells in culture, but a recent study using an arginine-rich
`peptide (ARP) conjugation to PMO markedly enhanced its cellular
`uptake and antisense potency by increasing the thermal stability of
`theARP-PMo-mRNA
`heteroduplex." Phosphoroamidate morpholino
`oligomer has demonstrated
`antisense
`efficacy in animal models
`in vivo and in human clinical
`trials.40,41
`
`DELIVERY OF ASO
`
`Unmodified naked ASO has a net negative charge and can barely
`penetrate the plasma membrane. Cellular uptake of ASO is primarily
`
`© 2006 The Authors
`Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell PublishingAsia Pty Ltd
`
`

`

`Antisense oligonucleotide
`
`537
`
`an adsorptive endocytosis process." Phosphorothioate modification
`of ASOs not only enhances nuclease resistance, but also promotes
`adsorption
`of ASOs to cell surface proteins,
`resulting
`in higher
`internalization of the ASOs. Peptide nucleic acid and PMO are non-
`charged oligonucleotides
`that do not interact well with cell surface
`proteins, making them even more difficult for adsorptive endocytosis.
`The amount of ASO that enters cells is so low that a variety of delivery
`strategies has been devised to enhance
`cellular uptake of ASOs
`and the ensuing mRNA knockdown
`(for a review, see Lysik and
`Wu-Pong"). Mechanical
`techniques,
`like electroporation
`and micro-
`injection, are very useful in delivering ASOs into cell cultures in vitro,
`but are impractical
`for in vivo studies. In contrast, chemical-mediated
`ASO delivery has been tested extensively in both in vitro and in vivo
`studies. Cationic lipid carriers
`like N-[I-(2,3-dioleoyloxy)propyl]-
`N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride
`(DOTMA)
`and N-[I-(2,3-
`dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium
`methyl
`sulphate
`(DOTAP) are the most widely used vectors for ASO internalization.
`Upon entry into the intracellular milieu in the form of an endosome,
`the ASO needs
`to escape
`from the endosomal
`vesicles
`to avoid
`lysosomal degradation so as to interact directly with target mRNA
`in the cytosol and in the nucleus. Dioleylphosphatidylethanolamine
`(DOPE) has been added into the lipid carrier formulation to promote
`endosomal membrane destabilization,
`leading to release of the ASO
`into the cytosol.":"
`Indeed,
`a pl-l-sensitive
`fusogenic
`liposome
`preparation
`consisting
`of DOPE and an amphipathic
`lipid, such
`as cholesteyl
`hemisuccinate,
`supports
`fusion of the liposomal
`and endosomal membranes at a pH below 5.5, resulting inASO escape
`and enhanced mRNA knockdown efficacy." The use of microparticles,
`such as biodegradable
`copolymer
`poly(n,L-lactide-coglycolide)
`in sustained-release ASO delivery has also been investigated. The
`ASOs, encapsulated in microspheres
`ranging from 10 to 60 IJ.m, are
`released gradually with enhanced serum stability, increased cytosolic
`and nuclear delivery and prolonged duration of ASO action in both
`in vitro and in vivo models.S'"
`Covalent conjugation of ASO to a macromolecule like dendrimer'v"
`and to cell-penetrating
`peptides (CPP)46 has been shown to promote
`cellular .....uptake of the ASO. Dendrimers
`are spherical
`and highly
`branched polymers with cationic polyamidoamine moieties capable
`of forming a covalent complex with the ASO.
`In contrast with the
`liposome formulation,
`the dendrimer-ASO complex is stable and
`active in the presence of serum. It enhances ASO cellular delivery
`into the cytosol and nucleus
`and increases
`the retention time of
`ASO in the cells. Conversely, CPP is a short peptide sequence « 30
`amino acids) with net positive charge that allows rapid translocation
`of a large molecule
`like the ASO through the cell membrane
`via
`an energy
`dependent
`pathway. Commonly
`used CPP include
`penetratin (RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK),
`HlV TAT peptide 48--60
`(GRKKRRQRRRPPQ)
`and transportan (GWTLNSAGYLLGKIN-
`LKALAALAKKIL-amide).
`The ASOs can be directly conjugated
`to any of these CPP via formation of disulphide bridge. By far, PNA
`is the most frequently usedASO in evaluating CPP-mediated mRNA
`knockdown in both in vitro and in vivo studies.":":"
`in liposome technology,
`Despite the advances
`the most critical
`challenge
`for the ASO to be an effective
`therapeutic
`is for it to
`be delivered to the site of action and to produce expected efficacy
`in vivo. There is a new trend of using topical application of ASOs
`Infact, the first clinically
`as the most popular mode of administration.
`approved ASO, formivirsen,
`is administered
`intravitreously, More
`recent studies have revealed that alicaforsen,
`a PS-modified inter-
`
`cellular adhesion molecule- I ASO, produced promising acute and
`long-term benefits
`in ulcerative colitis patients when given locally
`in an enema preparation," AP 12009,
`a PS-modified
`trans

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket