throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELA WARE
`
`IOENGINE, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`IMATION, CORP.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. 14-1572-GMS
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form,
`
`please follow the directions provided throughout the foim. Your answer to each question must
`
`be unanimous. Please refer to the Jury Instructions for guidance on the law applicable to the
`
`subject matter covered by each question.
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and
`
`return them under the instructions of this Co mi as our verdict in this case:
`
`2
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`1.
`
`Do you find that IOENGINE has proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
`
`it is more likely than not that the Accused IMATION Products infringe the Asserted Claims of
`
`the '04 7 Patent?
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates afindingfor IOENGINE.
`
`Checking "No" below indicates a finding for IMATION
`
`Do the Accused IMATION Products infringe Independent Claim 1 of the '047 Patent or
`any of the Asserted Claims that depend upon it (Claims 2, 7, 8, 14, 15, 22, or 23)?
`Product Name
`Yes (for IOENGINE)
`No (for IMATION)
`J
`IronKey S200 Basic
`v
`IronKey S250 Basic
`J
`IronKey D200 Basic
`\/
`IronKey D250 Basic
`J
`IronKey H300 Basic
`J
`IronKey H350 Basic
`J
`IronKey S 1000 Basic
`J
`IronKey S200 Personal
`J
`IronKey S250 Personal
`v
`IronKey D200 Personal
`J
`IronKey D250 Personal
`v
`IronKey S200 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey S250 Enterprise
`v
`IronKey D200 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey D250 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey H300 Enterprise
`v
`IronJ(ey H350 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey S 1000 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey W500
`J
`IronKey W700
`J
`IronKey HlOO
`J
`IronKey H200
`J
`IronKey Fl 00
`J
`IronKey F150
`J
`IronKey F200
`
`3
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`Do the Accused IMATION Products infringe Independent Claim 26 of the '047 Patent?
`Product Name
`Yes (for IOENGINE)
`No (for IMATION)
`J
`IronKey S200 Basic
`J
`IronKey S250 Basic
`v
`IronKey D200 Basic
`v
`IronKey D250 Basic
`J
`IronKey H3 00 Basic
`,/
`IronKey H350 Basic'
`J
`IronKey S 1000 Basic
`J
`IronKey S200 Personal
`v
`IronKey S250 Personal
`J
`IronKey D200 Personal
`J,
`IronKey D250 Personal
`v
`IronKey S200 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey S250 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey D200 Enterprise
`v
`IronKey D25 0 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey H3 00 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey H350 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey S 1000 Enterprise
`J
`IronKey W500
`J
`IronKey W700
`v
`IronKey HlOO
`v
`IronKey H200
`v
`IronKey Fl 00
`v
`IronKey F150
`'.:./
`IronKey F200
`
`4
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`Do the Accused IMATION Products infringe Independent Claim 27 of the '047 Patent or
`any of the Asserted Claims that depend upon it (Claim 29)?
`Product Name
`Yes (for IOENGINE)
`No (for IMATION)
`J
`IronKey S200 Basic
`IronKey S250 Basic
`J
`v
`IronKey D200 Basic
`IronKey D250 Basic
`.J
`IronKey H300 Basic
`.J
`IronKey H350 Basic
`J
`J
`IronKey S 1000 Basic
`J
`IronKey S200 Personal
`, /
`IronKey S250 Personal
`.J
`IronKey D200 Personal
`J
`IronKey D250 Personal
`J
`IronKey S200 Enterprise
`v
`IronKey S250 Enterprise
`IronKey D200 Enterprise
`v'
`IronKey D25 0 Enterprise
`..._/
`IronKey H300 Enterprise
`IronKey H350 Enterprise
`IronKey S 1000 Enterprise
`IronKey W500
`IronKey W700
`IronKey HlOO
`IronKey H200
`IronKey F 100
`IronKey F150
`IronKey F200
`
`v
`v
`J
`J
`.J
`v
`J
`J
`v
`J
`
`Please proceed to Question 2.
`
`2.
`
`If you answered "Yes" for any Accused IMATION Product, has IOENGINE
`
`proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the infringement was willful?
`
`Please proceed to Question 3.
`
`5
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`II.
`
`Validity
`
`3.
`
`Do you find that IMATION has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`any Asserted Claim of the '047 Patent is invalid as being anticipated?
`
`Checking "Not Invalid" below indicates afindingfor IOENGINE.
`
`Checking "Invalid" below indicates afindingfor IMATION
`
`Invalid
`(for IMATION)
`
`'047 Patent
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 2
`Claim 7
`Claim 8
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`Claim 22
`Claim 23
`Claim 26
`Claim 27
`Claim 29
`
`Not Invalid
`(for IOENGINE)
`.J
`v'
`J
`v
`v
`v
`v
`J
`J
`J
`J
`
`Please proceed to Question 4.
`
`6
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`4.
`
`Do you find that IMATION has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`any Asserted Claim of the '047 Patent is invalid for any of the following reasons?
`
`A.
`
`Enablement: Do you find that IMATION has proven, by clear and convincing
`
`evidence, that any Asserted Claim of the '047 Patent is invalid for lack of enablement?
`
`Checking "Not Invalid" below indicates a.finding/or IOENGINE.
`
`Checking "Invalid" below indicates afindingfor IMATION
`
`'047 Patent
`
`Not Invalidyr IOENGINE)
`
`Invalid (for IMATION)
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 2
`Claim 7
`Claim 8
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`Claim 22
`Claim 23
`Claim 26
`Claim 27
`Claim 29
`
`J
`J
`J
`v,
`\/'
`.J
`v
`v
`J
`v'
`v
`
`7
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`B. Written Description: Do you find that IMATION has proven, by clear and
`
`convincing evidence, that any Asserted Claim of the '047 Patent is invalid because it fails to
`
`contain a sufficient written description?
`
`Checking "Not Invalid" below indicates afindingfor IOENGINE.
`
`Checking "Invalid" below indicates a finding for IMATION
`
`'047 Patent
`
`Not Invalid 'r IOENGINE)
`
`Invalid (for IMATION)
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 2
`Claim 7
`Claim 8
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`Claim 22
`Claim 23
`Claim 26
`Claim 27
`Claim 29
`
`Please proceed to question 5.
`
`J
`J
`./
`J
`J
`J
`v
`v
`J
`JI
`J
`
`8
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`III.
`
`Inventorship
`
`5.
`
`Do you find that IMATION has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`any individual other than Mr. McNulty made a significant contribution to the idea claimed in one
`
`or more claims of the '04 7 Patent?
`
`Checking "No" below indicates afindingfor IOENGINE.
`
`Checking "Yes" below indicates afindingfor IMATION
`
`J NO
`
`- - - - -
`
`- - - - -
`
`YES
`
`Please proceed to Question 6.
`
`6.
`
`If you answered "Yes" to Question 6, indicate which individual(s) other than Mr.
`
`McNulty made a significant contribution to the idea claimed in one or more claims of the '047
`
`Patent?
`
`---------~
`
`Please proceed to question 7.
`
`9
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`IV.
`
`Damages
`
`7.
`
`If you found that the Accused IMATION Products infringed at least one
`
`Asserted Claim of the '047 Patent, and that the infringed claim(s) was not invalid, state the
`
`amount of damages that you find IOENGINE is entitled to from IMATION.
`
`Damages:
`I ' . 0 "llll 0 N
`
`$
`
`10
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

`

`For the Jury:
`
`z/n/17
`
`Date
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`11
`
`PayPal Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC
`IPR2019-00884 (US 8,539,047)
`Exhibit 2021
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket