throbber
British Journal of Pharmacology (2002) 137, 80 – 86
`
`ª 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0007 – 1188/02 $25.00
`www.nature.com/bjp
`
`A comparison of the actions of BIBN4096BS and CGRP8 – 37 on
`CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors expressed on SK-N-MC, L6,
`Col 29 and Rat 2 cells
`
`2Debbie L. Hay, 1Stephen G. Howitt, 1Alex C. Conner, 3Henri Doods, 3Marcus Schindler &
`*,1David R. Poyner
`
`1Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Institute, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET; 2Department of Metabolic
`Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN and
`3Cardiovascular Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, 88397, Biberach, Germany
`
`1 The ability of the CGRP antagonist BIBN4096BS to antagonize CGRP and adrenomedullin has
`been investigated on cell lines endogenously expressing receptors of known composition.
`2 On human SK-N-MC cells (expressing human calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and
`receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1)), BIBN4096BS had a pA2 of 9.95 although the slope
`of the Schild plot (1.37+0.16) was significantly greater than 1.
`3 On rat L6 cells (expressing rat CRLR and RAMP1), BIBN4096BS had a pA2 of 9.25 and a
`Schild slope of 0.89+0.05, significantly less than 1.
`4 On human Colony (Col) 29 cells, CGRP8 – 37 had a significantly lower pA2 than on SK-N-MC
`cells (7.34+0.19 (n=7) compared to 8.35+0.18, (n=6)). BIBN4096BS had a pA2 of 9.98 and a
`Schild plot slope of 0.86+0.19 that was not significantly di€erent from 1. At concentrations in
`excess of 3 nM, it was less potent on Col 29 cells than on SK-N-MC cells.
`5 On Rat 2 cells, expressing rat CRLR and RAMP2, BIBN4096BS was unable to antagonize
`concentrations up to 10 mM. CGRP8 – 37 had a pA2 of 6.72 against
`adrenomedullin at
`adrenomedullin.
`6 BIBN4096BS shows selectivity for the human CRLR/RAMP1 combination compared to the rat
`counterpart. It can discriminate between the CRLR/RAMP1 receptor expressed on SK-N-MC cells
`and the CGRP-responsive receptor expressed by the Col 29 cells used in this study. Its slow kinetics
`may explain its apparent ‘non-competive’ behaviour. At concentrations of up to 10 mM, it has no
`antagonist actions at the adrenomedullin, CRLR/RAMP2 receptor, unlike CGRP8 – 37.
`British Journal of Pharmacology (2002) 137, 80 – 86. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704844
`Keywords: CRLR; CGRP; RAMP1; RAMP2; CGRP8 – 37; BIBN4096BS; adrenomedullin; L6; SK-N-MC; Col 29
`Abbreviations: BIBN4096BS, 1-Piperidinecarboxamide, N-[2-[[5amino-1-[[4-(4-pyridinyl)-1-piperazinyl]carbonyl]pentyl]amino]-
`1-[(3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-2-oxoethyl]-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3(2H)-quinazolinyl); Col 29, Colony
`29; CRLR, Calcitonin receptor-like receptor; RAMP, Receptor activity modifying protein
`
`Introduction
`
`Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) is an abundant, 37
`amino acid neuropeptide (Amara et al., 1982). It is part of a
`peptide family that includes calcitonin, amylin and adreno-
`medullin. CGRP has a complicated pharmacology. The
`peptide fragment CGRP8 – 37 shows a significantly higher
`a(cid:129)nity for CGRP receptors in preparations such as the
`guinea-pig atrium or ileum (pA2 47) compared to tissues
`such as the rat or guinea-pig vas deferens (pA2 *6) (Dennis
`et al., 1990; Quirion et al., 1992; Tomlinson & Poyner, 1996).
`The receptors with a high a(cid:129)nity for CGRP8 – 37 have been
`designated CGRP1 receptors, as opposed to CGRP2 receptors
`that have a lower a(cid:129)nity for this peptide antagonist (Dennis
`et al., 1990; Juaneda et al., 2000). The linear agonists
`[acetamidomethyl-Cys2,7] human aCGRP and [ethylamide-
`Cys2,7] human aCGRP are reported to be CGRP2-selective
`although this is not always observed (Dennis et al., 1989;
`
`*Author for correspondence; E-mail: D.R.Poyner@aston.ac.uk
`
`Dumont et al., 1997; Wisskirchen et al., 1998). The CGRP1
`receptor is a complex formed from a G-protein coupled
`receptor, calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and an
`accessory protein,
`receptor activity modifying protein 1
`(RAMP1) (McLatchie et al., 1998). CRLR can associate
`with a second RAMP, RAMP2, to form an adrenomedullin
`receptor.
`Whilst the CGRP1, CGRP2 receptor division has allowed
`the rationalization of much pharmacological data, it may be
`an oversimplification (Poyner & Marshall, 2001). There is no
`molecular correlate for the CGRP2 receptor, although cells
`and tissues expressing CGRP2-receptors also express CRLR
`and RAMP1 (Chakravarty et al., 2000; Rorabaugh et al.,
`2001). There is a 1000 fold spread in the reported a(cid:129)nity
`constants for CGRP8 – 37 (Marshall & Wisskirchen, 2000),
`which is di(cid:129)cult to accomodate within two receptor classes.
`It has never been possible to identify CGRP2 receptors in
`radioligand binding studies (Dennis et al., 1990; Rorabaugh
`et al., 2001).
`
`1
`
`EX2056
`Eli Lilly & Co. v. Teva Pharms. Int'l GMBH
`IPR2018-01426
`
`

`

`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`81
`
`Many of the problems with classifying CGRP receptors
`are a consequence of having to rely on a single, peptide
`antagonist
`for determining pharmacology. Recently
`a
`number of
`low molecular weight antagonists have been
`described. The best characterized of these is BIBN4096BS
`which arose out of optimization of a dipeptide
`lead
`compound (Doods et al., 2000). This compound had about
`a 200 fold selectivity for primate CGRP receptors (e.g. on
`human neuroblastoma SK-N-MC cells) compared to non-
`primate receptors (e.g. rat spleen)
`(Doods et al., 2000).
`However,
`the pharmacology of
`the rat
`spleen CGRP
`receptor is unclear as CGRP8 – 37 has not been examined
`on this tissue in functional assays. On rat isolated tissues,
`BIBN4096BS showed a 10 fold discrimination between
`CGRP-activated receptors on the rat right atrium and vas
`deferens (Wu et al., 2000). This work also demonstrated that
`BIBN4096BS could act as a potent antagonist against a
`novel receptor on the vas deferens that was activated both
`by [ethylamine-Cys2,7] human aCGRP and adrenomedullin.
`Isolated tissues are likely to contain very complicated
`mixtures of
`receptors;
`for example the guinea-pig vas
`deferens has high a(cid:129)nity binding for CGRP, amylin and
`adrenomedullin (Poyner et al., 1999). Thus it is not clear
`what the molecular composition of the receptors might be in
`the rat spleen, vas deferens and atrium. Accordingly,
`it is
`di(cid:129)cult
`to
`relate
`the
`data
`so
`far
`established
`for
`BIBN4096BS with defined complexes of CRLR and
`RAMPs.
`We have recently investigated the nature of the CGRP
`receptors found in SK-N-MC, L6, Col 29 and Rat 2 cells
`(Choski et al., 2002). This study confirmed that SK-N-MC
`cells expressed CRLR and RAMP1, making this a suitable
`model for a human CGRP1 receptor. Rat L6 cells also
`expressed these components, establishing that
`these are
`suitable models for the rat CGRP1 receptor. Rat 2 cells
`expressed CRLR and RAMP2, making them a model of
`adrenomedullin receptors. Col 29 cells expressed CRLR and
`RAMP1 and had a CGRP1 pharmacology (Choski et al.,
`2002). We and others had previously observed a CGRP2-like
`pharmacology in these cells (Cox & Tough, 1994; Poyner et
`al., 1998).
`In the light of
`this discrepancy,
`it was of
`particular interest to re-examine the nature of the CGRP
`receptor in Col 29 cells using BIBN4096BS to see if it
`discriminates between CGRP-responsive receptors in human
`cells. Accordingly we have examined the behaviour of
`BIBN4096BS on SK-N-MC, L6, Col 29 and Rat 2 cells,
`comparing it with CGRP8 – 37.
`
`Methods
`
`Cell culture
`
`SK-N-MC human neuroblastoma were a gift from Professor
`S. Nahorski, University of Leicester and Col 29 cells were a
`gift from Dr S. Kirkland, Imperial College. L6 and Rat-2
`fibroblasts were purchased from the European Collection of
`Animal Cell Cultures (Porton Down, U.K.). Cells were
`cultured essentially as described previously (Poyner et al.,
`1992; 1998; Coppock et al., 1999). Briefly L6, Rat 2 and Col
`29 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
`supplemented with 10% heat inactivated foetal calf serum.
`
`SK-N-MC cells were grown in a 1 : 1 mixture of Dulbecco’s
`Modified Eagle Medium/F12 medium supplemented with
`10% foetal calf serum. Cells were passaged at confluency
`with Trypsin/EDTA (Sigma) and grown for experiments in
`48 well plates at 378C in 5%CO2/air
`in a humidified
`atmosphere.
`
`Measurement of cAMP
`
`An hour prior to experiments, the medium on the cells was
`replaced with Kreb’s solution (for Col 29, SK-N-MC and
`L6 cells) or serum free Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
`(GIBCO – BRL), both supplemented with 0.1% bovine
`serum albumin and 1 mM isobutyl methyl xanthine. The
`cells were preincubated with BIBN4096BS or CGRP8 – 37 for
`between 30 and 60 min as appropriate before addition of
`increasing concentrations of human (h)aCGRP or
`rat
`adrenomedullin. Incubations were terminated 5 min after
`addition of agonist by aspiration of
`the medium and
`addition of 0.1 ml of absolute ethanol. This was allowed
`to dry down at room temperature and the cAMP was
`extracted by addition of 0.25 ml of assay bu€er containing
`(mM): EDTA, 5, HEPES 20, pH 7.5. The samples were
`agitated for 5 min before 50 ml samples were withdrawn and
`cAMP measured by a radioreceptor assay as described
`previously (Poyner et al., 1992).
`
`Analysis of data
`
`The data from each concentration – response curve was fitted
`to a sigmoidal concentration – response curve to obtain the
`maximum response, Hill Coe(cid:129)cient and EC50 using the
`fitting routine PRISM Graphpad. From the individual
`curves, dose – ratios were calculated and these were used to
`produce the Schild plots shown in Figure 2. The plots were
`fitted by linear regression using PRISM Graphpad. The pA2
`was taken as the x intercept on the Schild plot where the
`slope was unconstrained; the pKb or apparent pKb was taken
`as the intercept where the slope was constrained to 1. For
`CGRP8 – 37, a pA2 was calculated from the dose – ratio
`produced by a single antagonist concentration using the
`formula pA2=log[antagonist]7log (dose ratio71). As com-
`petitive behaviour has previously been demonstrated for
`CGRP8 – 37 on L6, Col 29 and SK-N-MC cells (Poyner et al.,
`1992; 1998), the pA2 can be assumed to be the same as the
`pKb.
`(to
`t-test
`Statistical analysis was either by Student’s
`determine whether the slopes of the unconstrained Schild
`plots were equal to 1) or by one-way ANOVA followed by
`Tukey’s test where several values were being compared.
`Significance was accepted at P50.05; two-tailed tests were
`used throughout. All values are quoted as means+s.e.mean.
`
`Drugs and materials
`
`Ingelheim,
`synthesized at Boehringer
`BIBN4096BS was
`Pharma KG. Human aCGRP was purchased from Neosys-
`tems (Strassbourg, France). Human aCGRP was custom
`synthesised by ASG University (Szedgel, Hungary). Rat
`adrenomedullin was from Bachem (St. Helens, Merseyside,
`U.K.). Human aCGRP8 – 37 and peptidase inhibitors were
`purchased from Calbiochem. Isobutyl methyl xanthine was
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 137 (1)
`
`2
`
`

`

`82
`
`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, Dorset,
`U.K.). Cell culture medium and foetal calf serum were
`purchased from GIBCO – BRL (Life Technologies, Paisley,
`Renfrewshire, U.K.). Other reagents were purchased from
`Sigma or Fisher. BIBN4096BS was dissolved in a small
`volume of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid, the pH adjusted to 7 with
`sodium hydroxide and diluted to give a stock solution of
`100 mM (Wu et al., 2000). Both it and peptides were stored as
`frozen aliquots before use as previously described (Poyner et
`al., 1998).
`
`Results
`
`L6 cells (CRLR+RAMP1, CGRP1 receptor)
`
`A range of BIBN4096BS concentrations from 0.3 nM to 1 mM
`were examined on L6 cells. In the absence of BIBN4096BS,
`haCGRP stimulated cAMP production with a pEC50 of
`8.61+0.03 (n=6). BIBN4096BS caused a rightwards shift in
`the concentration response curve to CGRP, as illustrated in
`Figure 1. At lower concentrations there was no significant
`depression of the maximum response; however at the highest
`concentrations it was not possible to use su(cid:129)cient CGRP to
`examine the maximum response. After calculation of dose –
`ratios, a Schild plot was made of the data (Figure 2). This
`gave a slope of 0.89+0.05, significantly di€erent from 1
`(P50.05). The pA2 was estimated from the x axis intercept as
`9.25. On the same batch of cells, CGRP8 – 37 caused a parallel
`shift
`in the concentration response curve to CGRP;
`the
`dose – ratio was used to calculate an apparent pA2 of 7.81
`(Figure 3), in line with previous estimates for the a(cid:129)nity of
`CGRP8 – 37 on these cells (Poyner et al., 1992).
`
`SK-N-MC cells (CRLR+RAMP1, CGRP1 receptor)
`
`On SK-N-MC cells, haCGRP stimulated cAMP production
`with a pEC50 of 9.46+0.05 (n=23). BIBN4096BS produced a
`rightwards shift in the concentration response curve; as with
`the L6 cells, it was not possible to establish whether CGRP
`could completely overcome
`the
`e€ects of
`the highest
`concentrations of BIBN4096BS (Figure 1). The Schild plot
`gave a slope of 1.37+0.16, significantly greater than 1
`(P50.05). The pA2 estimated from the x intercept was
`estimated as 9.95; however, due to the high slope of the
`Schild plot, this will underestimate the true pKb (Figure 2).
`Increasing the incubation time with BIBN4096BS from
`30 min to 1 h or repeating the incubations in the presence
`of peptidase inhibitors (1 mM AEBSF, 0.8 mM aprotinin,
`50 mM bestatin, 15 mM E-64, 20 mM leupeptin and 10 mM
`pepstatin) had little e€ect on the potency of BIBN4096BS
`(dose – ratio to 0.3 nM BIBN4096BS; control 3.2, 60 min
`preincubation 3.5, with peptidase inhibitors 4.0).
`
`Col 29 cells (CRLR+RAMP1?, CGRP2 receptor?)
`
`On Col 29 cells, haCGRP stimulated cAMP production with
`a pEC50 of 8.38+0.05 (n=6). BIBN4096BS produced a
`rightwards shift in the concentration response curve (Figure
`the Schild plot was 0.86+0.19, not
`1). The slope of
`significantly from 1. The pA2 taken from the x intercept
`was 9.98. As the slope was not significantly di€erent from
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 137 (1)
`
`Figure 1 E€ects of BIBN4096BS on the stimulation of cAMP
`production by human aCGRP in the presence of the indicated
`concentrations of BIBN4096BS in (a) L6 cells, (b) SK-N-MC cells
`and (c) Col 29 cells. Data represent means+s.e.mean of two to five
`experiments. Points were measured in duplicate in each experiment.
`Data are expressed as percentage of maximum cAMP production,
`estimated by fitting each line to a logistic Hill equation as described
`in the Methods. Maximum cAMP values were as follows: L6 cells,
`270+30 pmol per 106 cells; SK-N-MC cells, 240+20 pmol per 106
`cells; Col 29 cells, 170+19 pmol per 106 cells. Basal values were all
`below 10 pmol per 106 cells.
`
`unity, it was possible to constrain this to 1, giving a pKb of
`9.75+0.14. If the slope of the Schild plot for SK-N-MC cells
`was constrained to 1, the resulting intercept of 10.49+0.017
`was significantly greater than the pKb measured on the Col
`29 cells (P50.001).
`We have previously noted considerable variability in the
`a(cid:129)nity of Col 29 cells to CGRP8 – 37 (Poyner et al., 1998;
`Choski et al., 2002). The a(cid:129)nity of CGRP8 – 37 on the Col 29
`cells used in the present study was compared with the SK-N-
`MC cells (Figure 2). Based on the dose – ratios measured in
`these experiments, the apparent pA2 for CGRP8 – 37 on the
`Col 29 cells was 7.34+0.19 (n=7), significantly less (P50.01)
`than that estimated for the SK-N-MC cells (8.35+0.18,
`n=6).
`
`3
`
`

`

`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`83
`
`Figure 2 Schild transform of concentration – response curves shown
`in Figure 1; (a) fitted to a straight line with unconstrained slope and
`(b) fitted to a straight line with slope constrained to 1.
`
`The nature of the BIBN4096BS-interacting receptor in
`SK-N-MC, Col 29 and L6 cells
`
`The pA2 values for BIBN4096BS as estimated by the x-
`intercept
`from the Schild plots are very similar for all
`three cell
`lines. However, only for the Col 29 cells is the
`Schild slope consistent with strict competitive behaviour;
`the pA2 for the SK-N-MC cells will be an underestimate
`that
`for
`the L6 cells will be an
`the pKb whilst
`of
`overestimate. In Table 1, the data from the Schild plots is
`summarized;
`it can be seen that the dose – ratios for all
`three cell lines are significantly di€erent from each other at
`high concentrations of BIBN4096BS. This argues
`that
`BIBN4096BS is able to distinguish between the receptors
`on each of the three cell lines. Furthermore, BIBN4096BS
`has very slow on and o€ rates;
`this suggests that
`the
`apparent non-competitive behaviour
`is
`simply a kinetic
`artefact (see Discussion). If this is accepted and the slopes
`of the Schild plots for all three cell lines are constrained to
`1, the intercepts are significantly di€erent from each other
`(Figure 2b, Table 1).
`
`Rat 2 cells (CRLR+RAMP2, adrenomedullin receptor)
`
`Human aCGRP was inactive on Rat 2 cells at concentrations
`of up to 1 mM but rat adrenomedullin caused a concentra-
`tion-dependant stimulation of cAMP production with a
`pEC50 of 8.75+0.11 (n=3) (Figure 4). This was weakly
`antagonized by CGRP8 – 37, with a pA2 of 6.72+0.06 (n=3),
`estimated from the shift in the concentration – response curve
`produced by 1 mM of the antagonist. At concentrations of up
`to 10 mM, BIBN4096BS was unable to antagonize adrenome-
`dullin.
`
`Figure 3 E€ects of CGRP8 – 37 on the stimulation of cAMP
`production by human aCGRP in the presence of the indicated
`concentrations of antagonist in (a) L6 cells, (b) SK-N-MC cells and
`(c) Col 29 cells. Data represent means+s.e.mean of four to seven
`experiments. Points were measured in duplicate in each experiment.
`Data are expressed as percentage of maximum cAMP production,
`estimated by fitting each line to a logistic Hill equation as described
`in the Methods. Maximum cAMP values were as follows: L6 cells,
`250+27 pmol per 106 cells; SK-N-MC cells, 230+18 pmol per 106
`cells; Col 29 cells, 180+17 pmol per 106 cells. Basal values were all
`below 10 pmol per 106 cells.
`
`Discussion
`
`This study describes the ability of BIBN4096BS to interact with
`cell lines expressing human and rat CGRP1(CRLR/RAMP1)
`receptors (i.e. SK-N-MC and L6 cells), rat adrenomedullin
`receptors (CRLR/RAMP2, Rat 2 cells) and a potential human
`CGRP2-like receptor (Col 29 cells). The use of cell
`lines
`expressing endogenous receptors has some advantages over
`artificially transfected systems. In particular, it is apparent that
`batches of some cell lines such as HEK293T and Cos 7 cells
`express endogenous CRLR or RAMPs. Some batches of Cos 7
`cells express an endogenous CRLR that accounts for up to 30%
`of the binding of CGRP when they are transfected with human
`RAMP1 (A Conner, unpublished observations). Thus the
`response seen with these cells will reflect a pattern of mixed
`monkey/human CRLR expression.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 137 (1)
`
`4
`
`

`

`84
`
`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`Table 1 Analysis of Schild plots for BIBN4096BS on L6, Col 29 and SK-N-MC cells
`
`Cell line
`
`pA2
`
`Schild plot analysis
`y intercept
`Slope
`
`‘Apparent’ pKb
`
`1 nM
`
`Log (dose – ratio), BIBN4096BS
`3 nM
`10 nM
`
`30 nM
`
`9.25
`L6
`SK-N-MC 9.95
`Col 29
`9.98
`
`0.89+0.05
`1.37+0.16
`0.86+0.19
`
`8.24+0.39
`13.60+1.37
`8.59+1.60
`
`9.10+0.05
`10.47+0.11
`9.75+0.10
`
`0.19+0.16 (3)
`1.36+0.21 (5)
`0.82+0.12 (4)
`
`0.79+0.07 (3)
`2.20+0.24 (3)
`1.43+0.31 (2)
`
`1.12+0.20 (3)
`2.57+0.26 (5)
`1.63+0.25 (4)
`
`1.69+0.12 (3)
`3.34+0.03 (2)
`2.19+0.23 (2)
`
`Values represent means+s.e.mean with sample size in brackets. pA2, slopes and y intercepts taken from Schild plots. The y intercepts
`are all significantly di€erent from each other (P50.05). The ‘apparent’ Kb was calculated by constraining the slope of the Schild plot to
`1 and calculating the intercept; as the 95% confidence limits for the L6 and SK-N-MC cells marginally exclude 1 (SK-N-MC, 1.036 to
`1.697; Col 29, 0.786 to 0.995), this will not give the true pKb. The values are all significantly di€erent from each other (P50.05). For
`the dose – ratios, the following are significantly di€erent: 1 nM; SK-N-MC versus L6, (P50.001), Col 29 versus L6 (P50.05), 3 nM; SK-
`N-MC versus Col 29 (P50.05), SK-N-MC versus L6 (P50.001), Col 29 versus L6 (P50.05), 10 nM; SK-N-MC versus L6 (P50.05),
`SK-N-MC versus Col 29 (P50.01), 30 nM; SK-N-MC versus L6 and Col 29 (P50.001), Col 29 versus L6 (P50.05).
`
`to the peptide (Poyner et al., 1992). For both SK-N-MC and
`L6 cells, if the dose – ratios obtained with very low (0.3 nM)
`and high (300 nM, 1 mM) concentrations of BIBN4096BS are
`excluded from the Schild analysis, then the resulting plots
`have slopes that are not significantly di€erent from 1. Thus it
`remains possible that the underlying reason for the apparent
`non-competitive inhibition is related to the experimental
`conditions used in this study.
`L6 cells express adrenomedullin receptors in addition to
`CGRP receptors (Coppock et al., 1996). This may provide an
`additional explanation of
`the apparent non-competitive
`behaviour of BIBN4096BS at
`these cells. Although the
`adrenomedullin receptors are not directly linked to stimula-
`tion of cAMP production, it is possible that at high CGRP
`concentrations, CGRP can activate these receptors and that
`indirectly this leads to some cAMP production that is not
`antagonized by BIBN4096BS.
`For SK-N-MC cells, the pA2 estimated from the x intercept
`with an unconstrained slope (9.95) probably underestimates the
`true a(cid:129)nity. Assuming that BIBN4096BS acts predominantly
`in a competitive fashion at the CRLR/RAMP1 complex, then
`the ‘apparent pKb’
`in Table 1 of 10.57, determined by
`constraining the slope of the Schild plot to 1 is probably a
`better estimate, although even this may be an underestimate.
`BIBN4096BS is a more potent antagonist on L6 cells than
`CGRP8 – 37, in line with what would be predicted from the other
`published studies (Doods et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2000). Given
`the problems with the slope of the Schild plots, it is not possible
`to estimate how much more potent BIBN4096BS is on human
`CRLR/RAMP1 compared to rat CRLR/RAMP1, as the ratio
`depends on the concentration of BIBN4096BS used. Based on
`the data shown in Figure 2a and Table 1, this could vary
`between 5 fold to over 10,000 fold; a comparison of the
`apparent pKb values in Table 1 shows a 24 fold selectivity.
`The results clearly demonstrate that BIBN4096BS shows
`preferential binding to the human CRLR/RAMP1 complex
`in functional assays and that the di€erences in a(cid:129)nity reported
`previously are due to genuine species di€erences within the
`same receptor subtype.
`It has been previously reported that BIBN4096BS has a
`very low a(cid:129)nity at displacing adrenomedullin in radioligand
`binding assays (Doods et al., 2000); however it was a good
`antagonist at an adrenomedullin receptor in the rat vas
`deferens. The inability to antagonize adrenomedullin at the
`CRLR/RAMP2 complex expressed by Rat 2 cells demon-
`strates that it shows at least 1000 fold preference for CRLR/
`RAMP1 in rats. The nature of the adrenomedullin receptor
`
`Figure 4 E€ects of CGRP8 – 37 and BIBN4096BS on the stimulation
`of cAMP production by rat adrenomedullin in Rat 2 cells. Data
`represent means+s.e.mean of three to four experiments. Points were
`measured in triplicate in each experiment. Data are expressed as
`percentage of maximum cAMP production, estimated by fitting each
`line to a logistic Hill equation as described in the Methods.
`Maximum cAMP values were 25+2.7 pmol per 106 cells. Basal
`values were all below 1 pmol per 106 cells.
`
`In confirmation of previous observations (Doods et al.,
`2000; Wu et al., 2000; Edvinsson et al., 2002), BIBN4096BS
`acted as a very potent antagonist at all CGRP-responsive
`receptors tested. The reported pA2 values of 11 and 11.2 from
`the studies of Doods et al. (2000) and Edvinsson et al. (2002)
`are in good agreement with the values from our study at high
`antagonist concentration (41 nM). However, it is apparent
`that in SK-N-MC cells under the experimental conditions
`used in this study, BIBN4096BS does not
`follow strict
`competitive inhibition as the slope of the Schild plot is
`greater than 1. A similar result was found with the L6 cells.
`In this case, the Schild plot slope is less than 1. In neither
`case is the discrepancy large. For SK-N-MC cells, we have
`attempted to investigate whether this may be due to peptidase
`activity (BIBN4096BS contains a peptide bond, albeit highly
`modified) but the cocktail of, peptidase inhibitors used in this
`study made little di€erence. Increasing the incubation time
`also made little di€erence. However, using [3H]-BIBN4096BS,
`slow on/o€-kinetics of
`this
`compound was observed
`compared to that of
`[125I]-CGRP (Schindler & Doods,
`2002). At high or low antagonist concentration, kinetic
`artefacts are more likely to occur. Thus at low concentra-
`tions, even 60 min may not be su(cid:129)cient to allow the drug to
`reach equilibrium. At high concentrations it is possible that
`once the BIBN4096BS is bound, its slow o€-rate means there
`is insu(cid:129)cient time for the CGRP to equilibrate with the
`receptor. It is not practical to increase the incubation time for
`CGRP, as desensitization is observed after 10 min exposure
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 137 (1)
`
`5
`
`

`

`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`85
`
`in the rat vas deferens antagonized by BIBN4096BS remains
`unknown, but this data suggests that it is most unlikely to be
`a simple CRLR/RAMP2 complex. It is interesting to note
`that against adrenomedullin, CGRP8 – 37 has a pA2 of 6.72;
`greater or equal to that found against CGRP2-like receptors
`(Dennis et al., 1990; Wisskirchen et al., 1998; Marshall &
`Wisskirchen, 2000). Thus it should be used with care,
`particularly to distinguish between adrenomedullin and
`CGRP when the latter acts through the CGRP2 group of
`receptors. It remains a formal possibility that BIBN4096BS
`has a higher a(cid:129)nity against
`the human CRLR/RAMP2
`complex than the rat equivalent examined in this study.
`Sexton et al. (2001) have argued that BIBN4096BS is likely
`to derive its specificity for CGRP over adrenomedullin by
`binding to RAMP1 rather than CRLR. Recently Kane and
`co-workers have produced radioligand binding data to suggest
`that BIBN4096BS interacts with residue 74 of human RAMP1
`(Mallee et al., 2002) and that this is responsible for the human
`versus rat selectivity. The functional data from this study is
`consistent with these findings. It would be unsurprising if the
`binding domains for BIBN4096BS and CGRP do not fully
`overlap, although it is likely that they will share some points
`of contact both on RAMP1 and CRLR. The greater
`selectivity of BIBN4096BS for CRLR/RAMP1 over CRLR/
`RAMP2 compared to CGRP8 – 37 may imply that the latter
`compound undergoes greater interactions with CRLR. As this
`is common to both receptors, its selectivity would be predicted
`to be less than that of BIBN4096BS. It will be of considerable
`interest to compare these compounds on the CRLR/RAMP3
`complex, which functions as a mixed adrenomedullin/CGRP
`receptor (McLatchie et al., 1998; Husmann et al., 2000).
`Col 29 cells are derived from human colonic epithelium
`(Kirkland, 1986). These have been reported to show CGRP2-
`like pharmacology (Cox & Tough, 1994). Recently, we have
`found the cells to express CRLR and RAMP1 and to show a
`pharmacology identical to that of SK-N-MC cells (Choski et
`al., 2002), in contrast to our previous data (Poyner et al., 1998).
`It was not possible to account for the change in behaviour of
`these cells. In the present study a fresh batch of cells was
`examined, although ultimately it was derived from the same
`source (Kirkland, 1985) as those examined previously by Cox
`and Tough and ourselves. CGRP8 – 37 had a pA2 estimated from
`a single antagonist concentration in excess of 7. This would
`normally be considered to be diagnostic of a CGRP1 receptor;
`however, this a(cid:129)nity was significantly less than that measured
`on SK-N-MC cells with the same batch of CGRP8 – 37. To try
`and control the a(cid:129)nity of the Col 29 cells for CGRP8 – 37 a
`variety of manipulations were carried out, including serum
`starving the cells for 24 h before use or exchanging normal and
`heat inactivated foetal calf serum. However, these did not
`
`References
`
`AMARA, S.G., JONES, V., ROSENFELD, M.G., ONG, E.S. & EVANS,
`R.M. (1982). Alternative RNA processing in calcitonin gene
`expression generates mRNA encoding di€erent polypeptide
`products. Nature (Lond)., 298, 240 – 244.
`CHAKRAVARTY, P., SUTHAR, T.P., COPPOCK, H.A., NICHOLL, C.G.,
`BLOOM, S.R., LEGON, S. & SMITH, D.M. (2000). CGRP and
`adrenomedullin binding correlates with transcript levels for
`calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and receptor activity
`modifying proteins (RAMPs) in rat tissues. Br. J. Pharmacol.,
`130, 189 – 195.
`
`produce any reproducible e€ect on the behaviour of the Col 29
`cells. It is possible that the a(cid:129)nity for CGRP8 – 37 is determined
`by one or more accessory factors, perhaps acting in concert
`with CRLR and RAMP1, and that irregular expression of these
`factors are the cause of the variable a(cid:129)nity for CGRP8 – 37. It
`should be noted that Cox and Tough reported no e€ects of
`3 mM CGRP8 – 37, whereas in our hands this concentration did
`antagonize CGRP (Poyner et al., 1998). Thus the variation in
`response to CGRP8 – 37 seems to be a long-standing phenom-
`enon.
`On the batch of Col 29 cells used in the current
`experiment, BIBN4096BS proved to be a more potent
`antagonist than CGRP8 – 37. Unlike the SK-N-MC cells, the
`slope of the Schild plot was not significantly di€erent from
`unity. At low concentrations, BIBN4096BS was as potent as
`on the SK-N-MC cells. However at higher concentrations,
`the dose – ratio values and hence the a(cid:129)nity were significantly
`lower on the Col 29 cells compared to the SK-N-MC cells.
`Thus both CGRP8 – 37 and BIBN4096BS can discriminate
`between the CGRP-activated receptors on these cell
`lines.
`Whether it is appropriate to call the receptor on the Col 29
`cells ‘CGRP2’ receptors is less clear, given the apparently
`high a(cid:129)nity for CGRP8 – 37. It is clear that the Col 29 cells
`can change their properties in culture to show a range of
`a(cid:129)nities for CGRP8 – 37 and so they must be used with care.
`The present study does support the concept that in humans
`CGRP can activate a variety of receptors with high a(cid:129)nity.
`However, only the molecular nature of the CGRP1 CRLR/
`RAMP1 receptor is understood. The ‘CGRP2’ receptor may
`be a distinct molecular entity or it may represent activation
`of some other receptor (amylin or adrenomedullin) by CGRP
`(see Poyner et al., 2002 for further discussion of this issue).
`In conclusion,
`this
`study describes
`the behaviour of
`BIBN4096BS on a number of CGRP and adrenomedullin
`receptors of known molecular composition. BIBN4096BS has
`a higher a(cid:129)nity for human CRLR/human RAMP1 compared
`to rat CRLR/rat RAMP1. It has a very low a(cid:129)nity for rat
`CRLR/rat RAMP2. However, under the assay conditions
`tested,
`the
`blockade
`of CGRP-induced
`e€ects
`by
`BIBN4096BS appear, in part, to be insurmountable. It can
`discriminate between the CRLR/RAMP1 complex expressed
`by SK-N-MC cells and the CGRP-activated receptor on Col
`29 cells. This latter receptor may consist of CRLR and
`RAMP1 with an unknown accessory factor. However the
`pharmacology of
`the Col 29 cells appears
`to show
`considerable variation with batch and passage number.
`
`We wish to thank the Wellcome Trust for support of this work.
`D.L. Hay was supported by a MRC studentship.
`
`CHOSKI, T., HAY, D.L., LEGON, L., POYNER, D.R., HAGNER, S.,
`(2002). Comparison of
`the
`BLOOM, S.R. & SMITH, D.M.
`expression of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and
`receptor activity modifying proteins (RAMPs) with CGRP and
`adrenomedullin binding in cell
`lines. Br. J. Pharmacol., 136,
`784 – 792.
`
`British Journal of Pharmacology vol 137 (1)
`
`6
`
`

`

`86
`
`D.L. Hay et al
`
`BIBN4096BS action on CGRP and adrenomedullin receptors
`
`COPPOCK, H.A., OWJI, A.A., AUSTIN, C., UPTON, P.D., JACKSON,
`M.L., GARDINER, J.V., GHATEI, M.A., BLOOM, S.R. & SMITH,
`D.M. (1999). Rat-2 fibroblasts express specific adrenomedullin
`receptors, but not calcitonin-gene-related-peptide receptors,
`which mediate increased intracellular cAMP and inhibit mito-
`gen-activated protein kinase activity. Biochem. J., 338, 15 – 22.
`COPPOCK, H.A., OWJI, A.A., BLOOM, S.R. & SMITH, D.M. (1996). A
`rat skeletal muscle cell line (L6) expresses specific adrenomedullin
`binding sites but activates adenylate cyclase via calcitonin gene-
`related peptide receptors. Biochem. J., 318, 241 – 245.
`COX, H.M. & TOUGH, I.R. (1994). Calcitonin gene-related peptide
`receptors in human gastrointestinal epithelia. Br. J. Pharmacol.,
`113, 1243 – 1248.
`DENNIS, T

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket