throbber
VOLUME 24 NUMBER 4 FEBRUARY 15, 1996
`
`Nucleic Acids
`Research
`
`
`
`OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
`
`1048 Codm NARHAD
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 1 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 1 of 10
`
`

`

`""c_'_"'.'_
`Nucleic Acids
`Research
`
`
`
`Executive editors
`
`R.T.Walkcr. Birmingham. UK
`R.J.Rohcrls. Bereriy. MA.
`(.iSA
`K.Calame. New l’ht‘k. NY: USA
`|.C.Eperon. L{’i(‘{.’.\'i£’i1 UK
`
`M.J.Gaii. Cambridge. UK
`H.J.Gross. Wiit'3bttrg. Germany
`R.I.Gumpon. Urbana. iL. USA
`
`R.B.Hallick. Tucson. AZ. USA
`S.Linn. Berkeiey. CA. USA
`R.T.Simpson. University Park. PA, USA
`
`Editorial board
`
`Afiuiroch. Genera. .S'n‘itzeriattti
`M.Bcalo. Marintt'g. Germany
`M.Be|ihri. Aii‘nm}; NY.
`i.-’SA
`M.Busslinger. Vienna. Austria
`H.Cedur. Jerusalem.
`ist‘ttei'
`
`RDalgleish. Len-ester: UK
`M.L.Di:P:1mphili1-..
`.-'\t'tttie\'. NJ. USA
`WDynan. Hattider. CO. USA
`REckslcin. Ct‘ittingen. Germany
`J.D.Engel. iz'i'ttnstnn.
`it'_. USA
`RTEngleLl. Httititntn'e. MD. USA
`D..I.Finnegtin. Etitnintrgit. UK
`M.Ge|lert. Bethesda. MD. USA
`R.Giegé. Strasbtnnjq. Frant'e
`LIAGI'lViill. Atttstet‘tittnt.
`‘i‘t'te Netiterittntis
`WGruissem. Berkeley. CA. {.-'SA
`W.Guhchlbuucr. (iiiLsttt'-l’-.-ette. Franee
`S.E.Hali'ord. iiristai. UK
`D.HaWIey. Eugene. OR. USA
`
`J.E.chtst. Berkeiey. CA. USA
`CHéléne. Paris. France
`A.J.Jeiireys. Utieester. UK
`S.-H.Kim. Bet‘keier. CA. USA
`A.R.Krainer. CSHL. NY. USA
`R.Krumlaul‘. London. UK
`A.Lamond. Dundee. UK
`D.S.Lalchmam. Landon. UK
`C.J.Lcavcr. Oxford. UK
`D.M.J.Lilley. Dundee. UK
`J.T.L.i.~;. ititttt'tt. NY. USA
`R.Luhrmiln. Mat-intrg. German}-
`N.C.Murlin. LilitiSl'iUt’. KY. USA
`M.McClclland. San Diego. CA. USA
`WRMcClure. Piti.\'hitt'_t:it. Hi. USA
`M.Muramatsu. Saittttna. Japan
`E.Oht§uka. Sapporo. Japan
`H.0kaytlma. Tithe. Japan
`M.V.Olson, Seattle. WA. USA
`
`M.G.Parkcr. London. UK
`R.K.Paticnt. London. UK
`MPaule. Ftn‘t C(tiiinx. CO. USA
`A.M.Pyle. New York. NY. USA
`J.M.Rosen. Houston. TX. USA
`H.Ruterjans. Ft'fltiKfiii‘i. Germany
`C.W.Schmid. Davis. CA. USA
`P.M.Sharp. Nottingham. UK
`l..Simpson. Lax Angeies. CA. USA
`S.T.Smulc. L115 Angela’s. CA. USA
`G.Stonno. Seattie. WA. USA
`R.H.Symons. Adelaide. Attstrait‘a
`K.Tuiru. Isakttba. Japan
`[Tinncu Jr. Berkeie)‘, CA. USA
`B.Vun News. Minneapolis. MN. USA
`A.M.Weiner. New Haven. CT: USA
`S.(‘.West. Sntttit Mimtns. Het'ts, UK
`J.A.Wise. Ciel-Timid. OH. USA
`Glut}. Faster Cit): CA. USA
`
`Editorial and Production
`
`Joy Walker. UK Etit'ttn'iai 0 11)
`Carol Cook. US Edittn'iai ()fi‘iee
`
`Sarah Brennan. Pmtittetimt Editor
`Jaquelinc Gruingcr. Ptrta‘nctian Assistant
`Robert Blundell. Prniitn-tiatt Assistant
`
`
`
`Pfizer EX. 1619
`
`Page 2 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 2 of 10
`
`

`

`/’—————__—/——
`
`Nucleic Acids Research
`
`_/_/———————
`Contents
`Volume 24 number 4 February 15. 1996
`///-
`
`HNA
`
`Base and sugar requirements for RNA cleavage of
`mential nucleoside residues in internal loop B of
`the hairpin ribozyme: implications for secondary
`structure
`
`S.Schmidt. LBeigclman. A.Korpeisky. N.Usman.
`U.S.Snrenscn and M.J.Gai1
`
`Preparation of biologicaily active Ascot-is strum
`mitochondrial IRNAMet with a TV-replacement
`loop by ligation of chemically synthesized RNA
`fragments
`T.0htsuki. G.Kawai. Y.Wat:tnabe. K.Kita.
`K.Nishikawa and K‘Watanahe
`
`Structural characterization of U*-l915 in domain
`W from Escherichia coii 235 ribosomal RNA as
`3-methylpseudouridine
`J.A.Kowulak. fiBrucnch T.Hashir.umc. LMPEIItflZ
`1.0fcngalnd and J.A.Mc("|oskcy
`
`MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
`
`Inducible site-directed recombination in mouse
`embryonic stem cells
`YZhang (‘Ricstcren A.—M.Ayrall. ESablilzky.
`T.D.L1ltlcwuud and MRth
`
`Activation domains of transcription factors
`mediate replication dependent transcription from
`a minimal HIV-l promo“?
`R.D.Williums. B.A.Lec. SRJackson and
`NJPmucll'tml
`
`Binding to the yeast Swi4.6-dependent cell cycle
`'3‘”. CACGAAA. is cell cycle regulated in NW!
`L.A.Harrington and BJAndrews
`
`DiiTerential transcriptional regulation of the
`3PM! gene by retinoic acid receptor homo- and
`heterodimers in yeast
`AJSnlerno. Z.Hc. Aflous-NilssOR. H-Ahma and
`P-Mak
`
`The DNA-binding protein 11de (a putative K"
`homologue) is required for maintaining norml
`tel
`.
`m as “WNW“
`omere length m Saccfingfiitchie and T.D.Pet95
`S.E.Porter, P,W.Greenw€
`
`Elements within the B-lactoglobuiill gene inhibit
`e
`albumin cDNA and
`x.Pr'a‘si‘ion of human serumls but rescue their.
`e"dilatation in the "summary gland of transgenic
`mice
`.
`LBarash. M.Nalhan. R.Kari. N.Ilan. M5118?“ and
`D.R.l-lurwitz
`
`573—58 I
`
`Characterisation of intronic uridine-rich sequence
`elements acting as possible targets for nuclear
`proteins during pre-mRNA splicing in Nicotiana
`plumbagt‘nifoiio
`M.Gniadkowski. M.Hemmings-Mieszczak, U.Klahre.
`H.-X.Liu and W.Filipowicz
`
`662-667
`
`Mismatch DNA recognition protein from an
`extremely thermophilic bacterium. Themes
`thermophiitts H38
`S.Takumatsu. R.Kato and S.Kuramitsu
`
`Sequences homologous to yeast mitochondrial and
`bacteriophage T3 and T7 RNA polymerases are
`widespread throughout the eokaryotic lineage
`N.Cennakian. TMJkeda. R.Cedergren and
`M.W.Gray
`
`688—693
`
`543—543
`
`549—557
`
`558—565
`
`566—572
`
`582-2585
`
`602—6 l [)
`
`Artificial linear mini-chromosomes for
`Trypanosonm bracei
`P.K.Patnaik. N.Axelrod. L.H.T.Van der Ploeg and
`G.A.M.Cross
`
`A novel type of retinoic acid response element in
`the second intron of the mouse HZK" gene is
`activated by the RARIRXR heterodimer
`RJansn and J.Forcjt
`
`Atomic force microscopy ol‘ long and short
`double-stranded. single-stranded and triple-
`stranded nucleic acids
`H,G.Hansma. LRevenko. K.Kim and D.E.Lancy
`
`Multiple mechanisms may contribute to the
`cellular anti-adhesive effects of phosphorothioate
`oligodeoxynucleotides
`Z.Khaled. LBcnimelskuya. RZeltscr. TKhan.
`H.W.Shnnna. R.Narayunan and C.A.Stcin
`
`The influence of a tGTizq microsatellite sequence
`on homologous recombination in the hamster
`adenine phosphoribosyltransrerase gene
`R.G.Sargcnt. R.V.Mcrrihew. R.Naim. GAdair.
`MMeulh and J.H.Wilson
`
`Binding site analysis of c-Myb: screening of
`potential binding sites by using the mutation
`matrix derived from systematic binding affinity
`measurements
`
`Q.—L.Deng. SJshii and A.Sarai
`
`GENOME STRUCTURE AND MAPPING
`Sequence analysis of 56 kb from the genome of
`the bacterium Mycopiasmo pneumoniae
`comprising the dnaA region1 the atp operon and a
`cluster of ribosomal protein genes
`HHilbert. R,Himmelreich. HPlagens and
`R.Hernnann
`
`619—627
`
`640—647
`
`648—654
`
`668—675
`
`694—701
`
`'1‘] 3—720
`
`737-445
`
`746—753
`
`766-774
`
`623—639
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 3 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 3 of 10
`
`

`

`—_'____——__—.____——-———————-\
`contents [Continuedl
`_____—_—______________—_—————————-——_______
`
`Volume 24 number 4 February 15. 1995
`
`ENZVMOLOGY
`
`Recognition of DNA insertionideletion mismatches
`by an activity in Socchoromyces cerevisme
`.l J .Miret. B.O.Parlter and R.S.Lahue
`
`CHEMISTRY
`
`Acid-induced exchange of the imino proton in
`G-C pairs
`S.Nonin. J.-L.Leroy and M.Guéron
`
`Hybridization properties of oligodeoxynucleotide
`pairs bridged by polyarginine peptides
`Z.Wei‘ C.—H.Tung. TZhu. W.A.Dickerhof.
`KJ.Breslauer. D.E.Georgopoulos. M.J.Leihowitr. and
`S.Stcin
`
`Rapid and eliicient hybridization-triggered
`crosslinking within a DNA duplex by an
`oligodeoxyribonucleotide bearing a conjugated
`cyclopropapyrroloindole
`E.A.Lukhtanov. M.A.Podyminogin. 1.V.Kutyavin.
`R.B.Meyer.]r and H.B.Gamper
`
`Use of a high affinity DNA ligand in flow
`cytometry
`K,A.Davis. B.Abrams. ‘1’.Lin and SiDJayasena
`
`The thermal stability ol’ DNA fragments with
`tandem mismatches at a dtCXYGl-dlCY’X'G] site
`S.-H.Ke and R,M.Wartcl|
`
`Triplex formation by a psoralen-conjugated
`oligodeoxyribonucleotide containing the base
`analog 8-oxo-adenine
`
`P.S.Milleri G.Bi. S.A.Kipp. V.Fok and R.K.DeLong
`
`Synthesis and hydrolysis of
`oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing
`Z-aminopurine
`J.Fujimolo. Z.Nuesca. MMaaurek and L.C.Sowers
`
`Antisense oligonucleotides containing an internal,
`non-nucleotide-based linker promote site-specific
`cleavage of RNA
`M.A.Reynolds. T.A,Beck. P.B.Say. D.A.Schwanz.
`B.P,Dwyer, WJDaily. M.M.Vagheli. M.D.Meltier,
`R.E.Klem and L.J.Arnold.lr
`
`STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
`
`High-resolution NMR study of a GdAGA
`tetranucleotide loop that is an improved substrate
`for ricin. a cytotoxic plant protein
`M.Orita. ENishikaWa. "I“.Kohno. TSenda, Y.Milsui.
`Y.Endo. K.Taira and S.Nishikawa
`
`775—781
`
`flirt—1'02
`
`596—601
`
`193—314
`
`795—?96
`
`797—qu
`
`ill ill-lit] |
`
`Hill
`
`72 l—729
`
`586—595
`
`655—6“
`
`683—687
`
`"till—Tilt)
`
`"lll'l—T l 2
`
`730—736
`
`Structure and dynamics of the DNA hairpins
`formed by tandemly repeated CTG triplets
`associated with myotonic dystrophy
`S.V.S.Mariappan. A.E.Garcin and (itiupm
`
`Solution structures of the individual single strands
`of the fragile X DNA triplets tGCCi,,-l(i(iCl,,
`S.V.S.Mariappan. RCalasli. X.Chen. R.Rallil'l'.
`R.K.Moyzis. E.M.Bradbur_v and G.Ciupla
`
`METHODS
`
`Transfecting mammalian cells: optimization of
`critical parameters aifectint: calcium-phosphate
`precipitate formation
`MJordan. A.St‘liallhorn and l".M.Wurm
`
`Non-radioisotopic differential display method to
`directly visualize and amplify differential bands
`on nylon membrane
`l.l.W.Chcn and KPeck
`
`A novel ligation mediated-PL‘R based strategy for
`construction of subtraction libraries from limiting
`amounts ol‘ mRNA
`5.Ghosh
`
`Efficient isolation of differentially expressed genes
`by means of a newly established method. 'ESD'
`YSUZURL N.Sato, Mfl‘uhyama. A.Wanalta and
`T.Takagi
`
`Increased cloning efficiency by temperature-cycle
`ligation
`A.H.Lultd. MDuch and F.S.Podcrscn
`
`iii-1459
`
`Corrigendum
`
`Author index
`
`Forthcoming events
`
`"loll—765
`
`fill—(illi
`
`Neornycin, spermine and hexaamminecobaltilli)
`share common structural motifs in converting
`- to A-DNA
`
`676—682
`
`H.Robinson and A.H.—J.Wang
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 4 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 4 of 10
`
`

`

`596-60!
`
`Nttcieic Acids Research. i996. Vol. 24. No. 4
`timization of critical
`-
`-
`'
`Transfectrng mammalran cells. op
`_
`_
`parameters affecting calcrum-phosphate precrprtate
`
`© two Uijflrr'ri Unit-emf). Pith
`
`
`
`._..__._.....
`
`formation
`Martin Jordan, Annette Schallhorn+ and Florian M. Wurm"
`
`Genentech lnc.. South San Francisco. CA 94080. USA
`
`Received November 8. 1995: Revised and Accepted January 2. 1995
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`co—precipitates arise
`DNA-calcium phosphate
`spontaneoustv in supersaturated solutions. Highly
`effective precipitates for transfection purposes,
`however, can be generated only in a very narrow range
`of physico—chemical conditions that control
`the
`initiation and growth of precipitate complexes. The
`concentrations of calcium and phosphate are the main
`factors influencing characteristics of the precipitate
`complex. but other parameters, such as temperature,
`DNA concentration and reaction time are important as
`well. An example for this is the finding that almost all
`of the soluble DNA in the reaction mix can be bound
`into an insoluble complex with calcium phosphate in
`<1 min. Extending the reaction time to 20 min results
`in aggregation andror growth of particles and reduces
`the level of expression. With improved protocols we
`gained better reproducibility and higher efficiencies
`both for transient and for stable transfections. Up to
`60% of cells stained positive for [i-gal and transient
`production of secreted proteins was improved 5- to
`10-fold over results seen with transfections using
`standard procedures. Similar improvements in
`efficiency (number of recombinant cell colonies)
`were observed with stable transfections, using
`co—transfected marker plasmids for selection. Transient
`expression levels 2 days after DNA transfer and titers
`obtained from stable cell lines, emerging weeks later,
`showed strong correlation.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Coprecipirates composed of ‘calcium phosphate' {Itydrtis)-apatitei
`and purified DNA have been used for >20 years for the transfer
`to and expression of genetic inl'omtation in mammalian cells in
`culture ( l J. This technique has become one of the major methods
`for DNA transfer to mammalian cells. A number of papers (2-6}
`have. addressed observed variability ol‘ DNA transfer and low
`efficrency and they usually contain specific recommendations for
`
`‘optim'dl' pmcgdtnes. However. these cortuttuttications did not
`report on the complex relationship3i between different “WP"-
`ncnts responsible for the creation of a supersaturated status. We
`present here data that provide the basis for u better understanding.
`at the physico-chemical level. of some of the most crucial aspects
`concerning the t'orrttation of DNA containing precipitate cum-
`pleses. We have applied gained insights in sets 02' transfeciiortt
`both for transient and stable expression of recombinant proteins. We
`used two popular immortalized ceil lines I'or these studies: human
`embryo kidney 293 cells [HI'iK-JUM t‘f—‘JI and dihytlrofulrrte
`rcductasc—minus t[)HFR«i Chinese hamster ovary cells tCI-lU]
`llU—lfil. We were able to improve the efficiency ol'DNA transfer
`and expression in both cell lines.
`This paper also illustrates that a simple cenli'il‘trgation—OD assay
`can be useful in studying kinetics and reproducibility of precipitate
`I‘umtation. This test provides information on the reliability of
`precipitate formation and gives greater assurance for successful
`DNA translcr to cells.
`
`-
`
`'
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Plasmid isolation
`
`Propagation til AmpR plasmids were thine in the bacterial filial"
`DHirt Uslttg :‘tll itgrrnl carbenicillin in Lli rncditrtn. DNA ““35
`isolated using the alkaline lysis method and was purified by dwbl‘.
`equilibrium centrit‘trgation in (\(I'I—etltidittnt bromide gradient“
`described by Sztrttbr‘ook er (ii. [23].
`
`Calcium phosphate—DNA ctr-precipitation
`A Stilutitm of IOU ul of 2.5 M C‘aC‘Ig and the desired amount of
`Plasmid DNA was diluted with tilt) TE buffer (I tnM Tris-HG-
`[).l rnM EDTA. pH to; to a final volume of l tnl. One volume
`0i this 2X Car'DNA solution was added quickly to all equal
`volume of 2x HEPES solution:
`l4lJ mM NaCl,
`5.5 in”
`NagHP04. it) mid HEPES. pH 7.05 at 23°C. or alternattvcli'
`PhUSPhatc-free 2x HEPES buffer was prepared and supple”
`ented with phosphate from a 300 mM stock solution of PH 7‘95
`containing 195 mM NazHP04 and 105 mM NuH1p04- Wm“
`
`___________..-
`
`.
`.
`at
`.
`.
`1"To whum correspondence should be addressed
`Switzerland
`prawn] mum” Delmmm “f Chem-“"3- SWISS Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne. "315 mum
`‘
`.
`.
`.
`+
`.
`Present address. FH Mannheim. Hochsehule l'iir Technik und Gestaltung caret Mannheim Ge
`.
`.
`. mtany
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019 '
`
`Page 5 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 5 of 10
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research. l996. Vol. 24. No. 4
`
`597
`
`'30
`50
`50
`4|}
`30
`20
`10
`
`2000
`
`1500
`
`1000
`
`500
`
`b “
`
`cells
`
`it.positive
`TNK—tPAinnng
`
`1 min.
`
`5 min.
`
`20 min.
`
`1 min.
`
`5 min.
`
`20 min.
`
`Figure 1. Transient expression oi'B-gal or "WK—[PA in HEK—293 and in CH0
`cells transfectcd with a calcium phosphate-DNA precipitate complex. The
`precipitate was allowed to from for l. 5 or 2i] rrrin after mix ing and then added
`to the cells. tAi Cells were l‘ixcd and stained with X—gal 24 h after transfection.
`[Bl Supcrttalrlnt was harvested and analyzed after 6 days.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Complete DNA binding can be achieved within seconds
`upon initiation of crystal formation
`
`Subsequent to the mixing of the calciumiDNA solution with the
`HEPESiphosphatc solution a slight opacity appears within a few
`rninrrtes. indicating that a precipitate has been formed. With the
`intention of having the reaction 'complete'. standard protocols
`suggest an incubation period of up to 20 {4) or even 30 min t 3)
`at room temperature. To measure the rate at which the DNA is
`being incorporated into or associating with the fonning precipitate
`an assay was developed. This test was based on a centrifugation
`step. The DNA concentration remaining in the clarified solutions
`was assessed by determining the optical density at 260 nm.
`Surprisingly. at a pH ol‘ltlfi and a DNA concentration of 25 rag/ml.
`adsorption of DNA occurred within 30 s.
`In fact 30 s was the
`shortest period for completion of this test. When either calcium
`or phosphate was missing in the mixture. no DNA was found to
`be adsorbed [data not shown).
`
`solutions were mixed quickly once. and added to the cell culture
`medium after the time frame indicated.
`
`Ccntrifugation assay
`
`Precipitate formation was confirmed and quantified by absorption
`at 320 nm against a blank lacking the phosphate or alternatively
`lacking both. DNA and phosphate. The association (binding) of
`DNA with precipitate was determined by OD measurement at
`360 and 320 nm of a 250 pl aliquot of the supernatant of the
`precipitation mixture after 30 s centrifugation (16 000 g} in an
`Eppendort' centrifuge. The supernatant was analyzed immediately
`after the centrifugation step. Precautions were undertaken to
`prevent heating up of the rotor when multiple samples were
`analyzed. For precipitation experiments at 0°C the rotor was
`cooled down on ice before it was used.
`
`Cell culture
`
`Cell culture was performed according to Doyle er of. [21}. Both
`CHO cells and 293 cells were grown in a DMEMiFlZ l:l based
`medium. supplemented with 2% fetal call'scrum. CHO cells were
`maintained attached in “i5 cnt2 ilasks. Cells (293 HEK) were
`adapted to growth in suspension and grown in 250 rrrl spinner
`llasks. Both cell lines were subcultivated once or twice a week at
`ratios between HO and 1:100.
`
`Transicnl transt'ections
`
`Cells from the ex porrcntial L—‘rowth phase were seeded t 1—4 x [05
`cellsi‘mli
`into 12-well or fit} nmr plates the day before the
`transfection was done. One hour before the precipitate was added.
`the medium was replaced With l‘rcs'h medium (pH 14}. For each
`ml of medium. 100 pl of precipitate was added. With a calcium
`concentration of 125 mM in the precipitation mixture.
`the
`resulting final concentration ot'calciunr in the cell culture medium
`was ~ I 3.5 mM. The cells were exposed to the precipitate for 2—6 b
`all 37 'C' at a pH of 7.3—7.6. For CHO cells. a glycerol shock was
`applied at this point. The cells were exposed to 2(1'7r glycerol in
`PBS. After l min the glycerol was removed by adding fresh
`medium. aspiration of the mixture and replacement with fresh
`medium. For 293 cells the medium was replaced by fresh medium
`without applying a shock. The cells were then incubated for 1—6
`d3.“ before the supernatant was harvested and analyzed by
`ELISA.
`’l‘ransl'ectjon efficiency was determined by staining
`B-galactosidasc expressing cells with X-Gal after 3-4 It (22).
`
`Stable transfection for CHO cells
`
`A 1: l (wtwi mixture of linearized and purified plasmid containing
`DHFR as a selective marker or the TNK—tPA (lo) expression
`cassette was precipitated as described above. The cells were
`grown for 2 days after transt‘ection in non-selective medium and
`the supernatant was harvested to measure transient expression.
`The cells were trypsinizod and seeded in 100 mm plates under
`different selective pressure. Of these cells, 2% were seeded in 100
`mm plates
`in medium lacking glycine. hypoxanthine and
`lhymidine {GHT— medium), 20% in GHT— medium containing
`30 nM methotrexate (MTX) and 40% at 100 nM MTX. After 10
`dill/5. the product titers from pools ofcells were assayed by ELISA.
`For each level of selective pressure. titers seen from emerging
`Pools of stable cells were normalized against each other.
`
`Time-dependent changes in the precipitation complex
`that atfect the efficiency for transfections
`
`To determine the optimal incubation time for the formation of an
`etl'rciettt precipitate for o‘rmsfections. the reaction mix was trans-
`ferred to cells at dilierent time poims upon initiation of the reaction.
`A B-galactosidase (figul) plasmid ([4) was used to estimate the
`number of tnuist'ected cells (Wansfection efficiency]. An expression
`vector for human tissue plasminogen activator [TNK-IPA) (15.16)
`was used in a second transfection experiment.
`Highest translection elflciencies were observed with precipitation
`mixtures that had been incubated for short periods of time. [n a
`representative experiment ~60% of CHO cells and 38% of
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 6 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 6 of 10
`
`

`

`598
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, 1996. Vol. 24. No. 4
`
`lb
`
`
`
`Figure 2. CHDceIIs with precipitates. visualized by phase-contrast microscopy
`(430x magnification] 4 h after adding the transfection cocktail to the cells. The
`precipitate mix was incubated for till I. (Bi 5 ortCl 40 min before transfer to
`die cells.
`
`HEK-293 cells stained positive for B-galactosidase in plates
`which had been exposed to l min precipitate complexes (Fig. IA).
`The transfection efficiency decreased to 3-5‘% when precipitates
`were used after an incubation period of 20 min. Using a 5 min
`reaction time gave intermediate resuits. Similar dil’threttces. here in
`yield of a secreted protein. were observed with a transl'osted
`TNK—tPA vector ( Fig. I B ]. Almost 2 pgftnl for HER-293 cells and
`0.5 ugl'ml for CHO cells of TNK-tPA were detected by ELISA in
`the supernatant of cells exposed to an 'early' precipitate—complex
`(l min]. ‘Late’ precipitates (20 min] gave only 10% of these titers.
`confirming observations made by O‘Mahoney er al. (6].
`These differences in transfection efficiency or in the levels of
`secreted recombinant protein could be correlated with the nature
`ofthecalcium phosphate precipitate in plates (Fig. 2). Precipitates
`added [ min after mixing. consisted of a large number of very small
`particles covering the surface of individual cells almost completely.
`Many particles scented to adhere to the cells. however many were
`floating in the medium and exhibited Brownian motionThe large
`number of particles and. possibly. Brownitut motion may be
`responsible for the image being of poor quality. Precipitate formed
`within a 5 min reaction time consisted of fewer but larger particles.
`None of these particles were floating. After 40 min the precipitate
`consisted of even fewer particles. some of them as big as the cells
`themselves. The highest nansfection efficiency correlated with the
`generation of many very small particles.
`
`Factors affecting the kinetics of precipitate formation
`
`Multiple aaitsfections. done on the same day with the same solutions
`usually give reproducible results but the transfoction efficiency can
`vary diarrtatically if experiments are performed on different days
`(own observations and personal communications). This provided
`
` boundDNA(ugrrnlt
`
`188mm Ca
`
`250mM Ca
`
`boundDNA(norm!)
`
`125mM Ca
`
`Figure 3. DNA binding capacity of a forming calcium phosphate precipitati- .1:
`1.5 and 20 mitt. {At Increasing DNA conccntnttious from 25 to fit} pglml at I33
`mM calcium.
`IBI Precipitation of 50 pghnl DNA at dili'crcrtt calcium
`concentrations.
`
`the motivation to systematically search for parameters which affect
`the precipitate formation and would change the efficacy in
`transt'cctions. Chen and co-authors (5] reported that lltc plasmid
`concentration needs to be optimized to achieve high tt‘anst‘ection
`efficiencies. We verified this observation and found that
`the
`
`amount of DNA can have a major effect on the precipitation
`reaction (Fig. 3A). At 25 uglntl all the DNA was bound to the
`limiting precipitate within l min. Higher concentrations ol‘DNA
`pautially inhibited the l‘orittation of precipitates.
`resulting in
`reduced amounts of DNA being associated witlt an insoluble
`precipitate complex. A DNA concentration of St] pgr’tttl DNA
`almost completely blocked the formation of precipitates. Even
`after a 20 min incubation time. (209’: of the DNA was associated
`
`with a precipitate.
`In an independent experiment (no temperature control] we
`show that increasing the calcium concentration could reverse ”“5
`phenomenon. 125 tnM calcium (standard) was compared wilh
`calcium concentrations of up to 250 ntM tFig. 38]. At a
`concentration of 2-50 mM calcium twice the amount of DNA was
`
`transferred into an insoluble precipitate. almost as last as seen
`under the standard calcium concentration for 25 (Lg/ml DNA.
`These data indicate that DNA participates early in the prom-‘\
`“lPTCCiPilale complex formation. The interplay ol'concentrationt
`ofcalcium and DNA points to the possibility that DNA molecules
`may ali'ect early events during nucleation and ‘ct'ystal' growth.
`Another important parameter is the temperature. DNA bindntg
`experiments were performed with a HEPES-phosphatc bufferlll
`“’hiCh “75 PhOSPhate concentration was reduced from 0.75 In
`0.6 mM. Results of one of these experiments are presented here
`(Fig. 41 Under reduced phosphate concentration the rate or
`PFCCitJitaIe formation was significantly slower. The indiVldfa'
`reactions Were performed at temperatures ranging from 0 to 37 C-
`At 20°C, a l min reaction time was no longer sufficient to
`completely bind the DNA in solution. Even after 20 min unit
`40% of the DNA was associated with a precipitate. N 3
`temperature of 31°C, however, fast and complete removal elm?ll
`from the solution occurred during the centrifugation step. No C
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 7 of 10
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 7 of 10
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research. 1996. Vat. 24. No. 4
`
`599
`
`A 50
`40
`
`20
`
`
`
`E an
`
`O E
`
`3O
`
`.D
`Ca
`‘5m1
`
`mtvt or phosphate
`
`Figure 5. Effect of calcium and phosphate concentration on the precipitation
`of DNA :5“ 1.1g DNNmt. ETC. pH 105. reaction time = l mini. Five calcium
`concentrations. ranging from |2.5 to 350 mM were tested. as indicated in the
`figure inserts. on Soluble DNA in the supernatant as a function of the phosphate
`mncclttrtttinn. [Bl Turbidity of the precipitation mixture Isuspensiont measured
`at no not.
`
`'—
`'
`. y=15.B XW'M’ 3:0.992 i
`
`3.5
`
`It:
`3
`to
`E 2.5
`8I:
`2
`a
`1 5
`.5
`.
`5
`1
`E
`0.5
`
`
`
`on
`
`so
`
`too
`
`150
`mM of calcium
`
`200
`
`250
`
`300
`
`Figure 6. Relalronslnp between calcrunt and phosphate concentrations
`sufficient to precipitate fill"? of the IJNA tt'tlhilt l min at 3.1 "C in atsolution with
`tit} pgjnd DNA at pH ltlfi.
`
`l35 mM calcium): a reduction of phosphate by
`precipitate tat
`35% to 0.5l ntM completely prevented binding of DNA.
`[a Figure 6 conditions :u’e summarized which address incom-
`plete binding of DNA. Concentrations of calcium and phosphate
`that will precipitate and bind 50% of the DNA provided were
`calculated from the data of Figure 5A. These data show that the
`association of DNA with an emerging calcium phosphate precipi-
`tate is a function of bodt calcium and phosphate concentration.
`
`Correlation between precipitated DNA and levels of
`expression
`
`Using the phosphate concentration as a tool to change the nature
`of the precipitate, we designed an experiment to conelate the optical
`characteristics with the uanstiection efficiency. Sufficient volumes of
`solutions were mixed to quantify the precipitation step and also to
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019
`
`Page 8 of 10
`
`boundDNAtpgt'ml) 24C
`
`Developing an assay to quantify the precipitation step
`
`Spontaneous precipitation occurs only if Concentrations of
`calcium turd phosphate are h i gh enough to ensure supersaturation.
`r’tll tlte data presented above suggest that conditions which affect
`the solubility of 'calcium-phosphate' would directly affect the
`nature ofthe precipitate complexes. To demonstrate this we tested
`live different calcium ctmccntrations between I25 and 250 mM
`
`in combination with It) dil'l'et'cnt phosphate concentrations
`between (HS and 6 rnM and determined the quantity of DNA
`remaining in solution after a centrifugation step (Fig. 5A). Willi
`acalcium concentration of 25“ ml“. the DNA was co-precipiurted
`fil a phosphate concentration of 0.5 mM or higher. When the
`calcium concentration was decreased. higher phosphate concentra-
`tions were needed to cit-precipitate DNA. Precipitatc-contples
`tonaation and binding of DNA could be initiated with each ot'thc
`calcium ct‘atccntratiorts used. yet at 12.5 mm calcium.
`the
`phosphate concentration had to be 2-1 ntM.
`To assess precipitate complex tormation directly. the mixture
`Isuspcnsiont was transferred into a spectrophotometer curettc.
`The non-precipitated solutions show no absorption at 320 nm
`”"2— 531. An increase of absorption at 320 nm indicates the
`appearance of a precipitate. which could be confirmed visually:
`“If: higher the phosphate concentration.
`the more cloudy the
`t'ttxpensron. Increasing concentrations of phosphate resulted for
`faith calcium—DNA mixture in atypical curve. showing ittcrea-‘iillg
`UPUCaI densities at higher phosphate concentrations. This assay is
`will reliable and gave reproducible results when performed with
`The same solutions repeatedly. It allows to distinguish pWCiPim'C-‘t
`WM With different phosphate concentrations together with the
`name calcium and DNA solutions.
`It should be noted.
`that
`alJStJIlJttttn at 320 nm is influenced by various parameters such as
`"i’St-tl “3’3. Particle number and structural characteristics of the
`PreF'PIFate complex and that an individual value does not give
`Ilttilrcations about the ratio of effects mediated by these different
`Pam-meters,
`tract-El?!” binding of DNA correlates with the appearance of a
`Wlpltate. Incomplete binding of DNA occurs in a very
`:imw concentration range of phosphate. While at a PhOFPha‘e
`mttit'ttrauon of 0.7? mM all DNA was associated thh the
`
`B
`
`SE
`
`._
`
`hi
`‘Fn0
`:3D
`o
`
`Figure 4. lilfecl of temperature on tol'ttiatlon of DNA—calcium phosphate
`anipitate crunpleses under a reduced phosphate concentration "run tnM.
`
`nntlrc other hand. all the DNA remained in the supernatant and
`almost no precipitate could be detected after 20 min. This
`indicates a reduced solubility of calcium phosphate at elevated
`temperature. and it appcw's that
`relatively small variations in
`temperature are able to afl'ect
`the kinetics of precipitate cotnples
`litrmation.
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1019
`Page 8 of 10
`
`

`

`600 NucleicAcidr Research. l996, Vol. 24. No. 4
`
`st
`
`3
`13
`c

`9
`'0'D1
`
`A .
`
`B
`
`_. 250
`s
`g 200
`E
`?
`E
`4-
`o.
`T
`a
`"
`
`
`
`0
`
`0.1
`
`‘I
`mlvl of phosphate
`
`i U
`
`0
`0
`o
`3
`
`_|
`s
`£5
`7*
`ii"3
`‘9.
`i
`A
`E
`2
`
`titers
`normalizedstable
`
`
`— "- ‘GHT minus
`"“9... 30"” ”TX
`—"I— 100nM MTX
`
`1 .5
`1
`0.5
`0
`
`normatized transient titers
`
`2
`
`25
`
`_... — - y = 0232??) . 035'. is: in 0.62962
`
`I
`......... y = 0.10132 + 0.66160): Ft: 0.72945
`
`y = 0.20711 . 0.09am Fl: 0.621?
`|
`
`Figure 8. Correlation between transient and slahlc expression of [PA in 3 Sci of
`It] independent lmnslcclions. l-rotit each plate cells \vcrc seeded in selectite
`medium with increasing sclcctnc Pressure 1(ill'l'—. ill a.“ MTX and Ilium“
`MTXi 2 davs alter transt'cction. 'i‘ransicnt expression levels were assessed!
`days after translation stable expression levels were itsseswrl I'rtJIit pools ill
`cells after 2 weeks.
`
`the number of emerging clones alter the selection period oil—3
`weeks was found to be different ior each type of lranst'cction used.
`Most importantly. conditions that generated cliicicttt precipitate
`complexes for transient expression. also resulted in the largest
`number of stable clones (data not shown. 17).
`Figure 8 shows that expression levels generator] transiently (2 days
`after exposure of DNA to the cells) correlate to the protein levels
`observed in pools ol'stahie cells selected alter 2 weeks. Nonnuliretl
`values for transient expression were plotted against nonnaliaxl
`values representing stable expression of pools of recombinant cells
`selected under three different stringency conditions: medium tier
`ol‘glyeine. hypoxanthinc and tliyniidine tGHT—I. or GHT— media
`containing either 30 nM nicthotrexate 1MTX) or IOU nM MTX.
`Stable titers were Itorltialircd within each selection group. TM
`stringency ol' selcction. as expected. affected the stable lransfectiotl
`cliiciency (numbers of clones observed 1: higher selective prcfinm‘
`resulted in fewer clinics as well as in slightly smaller colony tilts
`Linear regression of the plotted data gave correlation coefficients
`of 0.83 for the values seen in the (.iHT— case [99% chance at
`correlation). 0.73 in the 30 nM MTX case [95% chance of
`correlation) and [3.62 in the Hit) nM MTX case (90% chancc 0i
`correlation). It is remarkable that the correlation for the till] 3““
`MTX ease remained good. in spite ol‘ the fact that the individual
`1900's ofstable clones consisted of only six clones (in the carcass
`WhiCh gave lowest transient titers) to 35 clones (in one ollht
`transfections which gave better transient titers). Therefore-837'}
`I
`assessment of a iransfection. using the supernatant just 2 days
`after DNA exposure. indicates whether few or many 300dClam l
`are likely to emerge weeks later.
`I
`
`1
`
`1
`
`i
`|
`
`.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The principle ofthe catcinm-phosphate—DNA t3re‘iii’ii‘ltioiI memo:
`originally developed by Graham and Van der Eh (I), *5 “ml
`Nevertheless the formation of an optimal DNA—calcium Dim--
`uflmfimmwisdmkth Eflmmw o8)hw““'-
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`l
`‘l
`
`i
`
`Pfizer EX. 1019 L
`
`Page 9 of 10
`
`Figure T. Asxessmcnt of various phosphate concentrations during the
`fom'iation of a precipitate (25 pg DNNIIii. 23 5C. IZS mM cailcruni.
`I. aim and
`pH 105}. iii! Quantity of soluble DNA in the supematant alter cenlnlugalion
`of the precipitation mix and optical density of the precipitation iiiixlurc at
`320 rim. I11] Transient expnrssion levels of tPA in the supe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket