throbber
PCT
`
`WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`Intematlonal Bureau
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`(51) International Patent Classification 6 1
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`
`WO 99/57134
`
`C07K 1/18, 16/32
`
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`11 November 1999 (11.11.99)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`3 May 1999 (03.05.99)
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`60/084,459
`
`6 May 1998 (06.05.98)
`
`US
`
`(71) Applicant: GENENTECH, INC. [US/US]; 1 DNA Way, South
`San Francisco, CA 94080-4990 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors: BASEY, Carol, D.; 319 Hillview Lane, Winters,
`CA 95694 (US). BLANK, Greg, 8.; 1320 Hobart Street,
`Menlo Park, CA 94025 (US).
`
`(74) Agents: LEE, Wendy, M. et al.; Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way,
`South San Francisco, CA 94080—4990 (US).
`
`(81) Designated States: AE, AL, AM, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG,
`BR, BY, CA, CH, CN, CU, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, GB,
`GD, GE, GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG,
`KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LV, MD, MG, MK,
`MN, MW, MX, NO, NZ, PL, PT, RO, RU, SD, SE, SG, SI,
`SK, SL, TJ, TM, TR, TT, UA, UG, UZ, VN, YU, ZA, ZW,
`ARIPO patent (GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, SD, SL, SZ, UG,
`ZW), Eurasian patent (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ,
`TM), European patent (AT, BE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI,
`FR, GB, GR, IE, IT, LU, MC, NL, PT, SE), OAPI patent
`(BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE,
`SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published
`With international search report.
`Before the expiration of the time limit for amending the
`claims and to be republished in the event of the receipt of
`amendments.
`
`(54) Title: PROTEIN PURIFICATION BY ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY
`
`1.0 M NaCI
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`A method for purifying a polypeptide by ion exchange chro-
`matography is described which involves changing the conductivity
`and/or pH of buffers in order to resolve a polypeptide of interest
`from one or more contaminants.
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`LOADING
`BUFFER
`50 mM NaCI
`
`INTERMEDIATE
`BUFFER
`70 mM NaCl
`
`I
`
`ELUTION
`BUFFER
`95 mM NaCI
`
`‘
`
`WASH
`BUFFER
`50 mM NaCI
`
`REGENERATION
`BUFFER
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 1 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 1 of 39
`
`

`

`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`Slovenia
`SI
`LS
`Lesotho
`SK
`Slovakia
`LT
`Lithuania
`SN
`LU
`Senegal
`Luxembourg
`SZ
`Swaziland
`LV
`Latvia
`TD
`Chad
`MC
`Monaco
`TG
`MD
`Togo
`Republic of Moldova
`MG
`TJ
`Tajikistan
`Madagascar
`TM
`Turkmenistan
`MK
`The former Yugoslav
`TR
`Turkey
`Republic of Macedonia
`TT
`Mali
`Trinidad and Tobago
`UA
`Ukraine
`Mongolia
`UG
`Mauritania
`Uganda
`US
`United States of America
`Malawi
`UZ
`Uzbekistan
`Mexico
`VN
`Viet Nam
`Niger
`YU
`Netherlands
`Yugoslavia
`ZW
`Norway
`New Zealand
`Poland
`Portugal
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Sudan
`Sweden
`Singapore
`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`Iceland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People’s
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`PT
`RO
`RU
`SD
`SE
`SG
`
`Zimbabwe
`
`Albania
`Armenia
`Austria
`Australia
`Azerbaijan
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`Belgium
`Burkina Faso
`Bulgaria
`Benin
`Brazil
`Belarus
`Canada
`Central African Republic
`Congo
`Switzerland
`cote d’Ivoire
`Cameroon
`China
`Cuba
`Czech Republic
`Germany
`Denmark
`Estonia
`
`ES
`FI
`FR
`GA
`GB
`GE
`GH
`GN
`GR
`HU
`IE
`IL
`IS
`IT
`JP
`KE
`KG
`KP
`
`KR
`KZ
`LC
`LI
`LK
`LR
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 2 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 2 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`PROTEIN PURIFICATION BY ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Field ofthe Invention
`
`This invention relates generally to protein purification. In particular. the invention relates to a method
`
`for purifying a polypeptide (e. g. an antibody) from a composition comprising the polypeptide and at least one
`
`contaminant using the method of ion exchange chromatography.
`
`Description of Related Art
`
`The large-scale. economic purification of proteins is increasingly an important problem for the
`
`biotechnology industry. Generally, proteins are produced by cell culture, using either mammalian or bacterial cell
`
`lines engineered to produce the protein of interest by insertion of a recombinant plasmid containing the gene for
`
`that protein. Since the cell lines used are living organisms, they must be fed with a complex growth medium,
`
`containing sugars. amino acids, and growth factors, usually supplied from preparations of animal serum.
`
`Separation of the desired protein from the mixture of compounds fed to the cells and from the by-products of the
`
`cells themselves to a purity sufficient for use as a human therapeutic poses a formidable challenge.
`
`Procedures for purification of proteins from cell debris initially depend on the site of expression of the
`
`protein. Some proteins can be caused to be secreted directly from the cell into the surrounding growth media;
`
`others are made intracellularly. For the latter proteins. the first step of a purification process involves lysis of the
`
`cell. which can be done by a variety of methods. including mechanical shear, osmotic shock, or enzymatic
`
`treatments. Such disruption releases the entire contents of the cell into the homogenate. and in addition produces
`
`subcellular fragments that are difficult to remove due to their small size. These are generally removed by
`
`differential centrifugation or by filtration. The same problem arises. although on a smaller scale, with directly
`
`secreted proteins due to the natural death of cells and release of intracellular host cell proteins in the course of
`
`the protein production run.
`
`Once a clarified solution containing the protein of interest has been obtained. its separation from the
`
`other proteins produced by the cell
`
`is usually attempted using a combination of different chromatography
`
`techniques. These techniques separate mixtures of proteins on the basis of their charge, degree of hydrophobicity.
`
`or size. Several different chromatography resins are available for each of these techniques, allowing accurate
`
`tailoring of the purification scheme to the particular protein involved. The essence of each of these separation
`
`methods is that proteins can be caused either to move at different rates down a long column, achieving a physical
`
`separation that increases as they pass further down the column. or to adhere selectivelyto the separation medium,
`
`being then differentially eluted by different solvents. In some cases, the desired protein is separated from
`
`impurities when the impurities specifically adhere to the column. and the protein of interest does not, that is, the
`
`protein of interest is present in the "flow-through".
`
`Ion exchange chromatography is a chromatographictechnique that is commonly used for the purification
`
`of proteins. In ion exchange chromatography, charged patches on the surface of the solute are attracted by
`
`opposite charges attached to a chromatography matrix, provided the ionic strength of the surrounding buffer is
`
`low, Elution is generally achieved by increasingthe ionic strength (tie. conductivity) of the buffer to compete with
`
`the solute for the charged sites ofthe ion exchange matrix. Changing the pH and thereby altering the charge of
`
`l
`
`10
`
`15
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 3 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 3 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`IO
`
`15
`
`20
`
`the solute is another way to achieve elution of the solute. The change in conductivity or pH may be gradual
`
`(gradient elution) or stepwise (step elution). In the past, these changes have been progressive; z'.e., the pH or
`
`conductivity is increased or decreased in a single direction.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention provides an ion exchange chromatographic method wherein a polypeptide of
`
`interest is bound to the ion exchange material at an initial conductivity or pH and then the ion exchange material
`
`is washed with an intermediate buffer at a different conductivity or pH, or both. At a specific point followingthis
`
`intermediate wash, and contrary to ion exchange chromatography standard practice. the ion exchange material
`
`is washed with a wash buffer where the change in conductivity or pH, or both, from the intermediate buffer to
`
`the wash buffer is in an opposite direction to the change in conductivity or pH, or both. achieved in the previous
`
`steps. Only after washing with the wash buffer,
`
`is the ion exchange material prepared for the polypeptide
`
`molecule of interest to be eluted by the application of the elution buffer having a conductivity or pH, or both,
`
`which differ from the conductivity or pH, or both, ofthe buffers used in previous steps.
`
`This novel approach to ion exchange chromatography is particularly useful in situations where a product
`
`molecule must be separated from a very closely related contaminant molecule at full manufacturing scale, where
`
`both purity and high recovery of polypeptide product are desired.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`the invention provides a method for purifying a polypeptide from a composition
`
`comprising the polypeptide and a contaminant, which method comprises the following steps performed
`
`sequentially:
`
`(a) binding the polypeptide to an ion exchange material using a loading buffer, wherein the loading
`
`buffer is at a first conductivity and pH;
`
`(b) washing the ion exchange material with an intermediate buffer at a second conductivity and/or pH
`
`so as to elute the contaminant from the ion exchange material;
`
`(c) washing the ion exchange material with a wash buffer which is at a third conductivity and/or pH,
`
`wherein the change in conductivity and/or pH from the intermediate buffer to the wash buffer is in an opposite
`
`direction to the change in conductivity and/or pH from the loading buffer to the intermediate buffer; and
`
`(d) washing the ion exchange material with an elution buffer at a fourth conductivity and/or pH so as
`
`to elute the polypeptide from the ion exchange material. The first conductivity and/or pH may be the same as
`
`the third conductivity and/or pH.
`
`Where the ion exchange material comprises a cation exchange resin, the conductivity and/or pH ofthe
`
`intermediate buffer is/are preferably greater than the conductivity and/or pH of the loading buffer;
`
`the
`
`conductivity and/or pH of the wash buffer is/are preferably less than the conductivity and/or pH of the
`
`intermediate buffer: and the conductivity and/or pH of the elution buffer is/are preferably greater than the
`
`conductivity and/or pH of the intermediate buffer. Preferably, the conductivity and/or pH of the wash buffer is/are
`
`35
`
`about the same as the conductivity and/0r pH of the loading buffer.
`
`Preferably elution of the contaminant and of the polypeptide is achieved by modifying the conductivity
`
`of the intermediate buffer and of the elution buffer, respectively, while keeping the pH of these buffers
`
`approximately the same.
`
`The invention also provides a method for purifying a polypeptide from a composition comprising the
`2
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 4 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 4 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`polypeptide and a contaminant. which method comprises the following steps performed sequentially:
`
`(a) binding the polypeptide to a cation exchange material using a loading buffer. wherein the loading
`
`buffer is at a first conductivity and pH;
`
`(b) washing the cation exchange material with an intermediate buffer at a second conductivity and/or
`
`pH which is greaterthan that of the loading buffer so as to elute the contaminant from the ion exchange material;
`
`(c) washing the cation exchange material with a wash buffer which is at a third conductivity and/or pH
`
`which is less than that of the intermediate buffer; and
`
`(d) washing the cation exchange material with an elution buffer at a fourth conductivity and/or pH which
`
`is greater than that of the intermediate buffer so as to elute the polypeptide from the ion exchange material.
`
`In addition, the invention provides a method for purifying an antibody from a composition comprising
`
`the antibody and a contaminant. which method comprises loading the composition onto a cation exchange resin,
`
`wherein the amount of antibody loaded onto the cation exchange resin is from about 20mg to about 35mg ofthe
`
`antibody per mL of cation exchange resin and, optionally, further comprising eluting the antibody from the cation
`
`exchange resin. The method preferably further comprises an intermediate wash step for eluting one or more
`
`contaminants from the ion exchange resin. This intermediate wash step usually precedes the step of eluting the
`
`antibody.
`
`The invention further provides a composition comprising a mixture of anti-HER2 antibody and one or
`
`more acidic variants thereof, wherein the amount of the acidic variant(s) in the composition is less than about 25%
`
`and preferably less than about 20%. eg. in the range from about 1% to about 18%. Optionally, the composition
`
`further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
`
`Brief Description OfThe Drawings
`
`Figure l
`
`is a flow diagram showing how one could perform cation exchange chromatography by altering
`
`conductivity (e.g. to the NaCl concentrations of Example 1 below) or by altering pH (e.g. to the pH values as
`
`shown in the flow diagram).
`
`Figure 2 is a flow diagram showing how one could perform anion exchange chromatography by altering
`
`conductivity (e.g. to the NaCl concentrations as depicted in the figure) or by altering pH (e.g. to the pH values
`
`as shown).
`
`Figure 3 is an absorbance trace from a cation exchange chromatography run of Example 1 at full
`
`manufacturing scale. Points at which the column is washed with the different buffers described herein are marked
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`with arrows.
`
`Figure 4 depicts recombinant humanized anti-HERZ monoclonal antibody (rhuMAb HERZ) recovered
`
`in each chromatography fraction (calculated as the percentage of the sum total of all fractions of the relevant
`
`chromatography). Flow through, wash steps, and prepool fractions are all effluent samples collected from the
`
`onset of load to the initiation of pooling. The pool fraction is the five column volume effluent sample of elution
`
`35
`
`starting at the leading shoulder’s inflection point. The regeneration fraction contains effluent captured from the
`
`end of pooling to the end of regeneration.
`
`Figure 5 shows the quality of rhuMAb HERZ in each cation exchange chromatography pool sample as
`
`evaluated by carboxy sulfon cation exchange high pressure liquid chromatography (CSx HPIEX). Peaks a, b, and
`
`l are deamidated forms of rhuMAb HERZ. Peak 3 is nondeamidated rhuMAb HERZ. Peak 4 is a combination
`
`3
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 5 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 5 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`of C-terminal Lysine containing and iso-aspartate variants of rhuMAb HERZ.
`
`Figure 6 shows the absorbance (280 nm) profiles ofthe 0.025 M MES / 0.070 M NaCl, pH 5.6 wash for
`
`each chromatography. The mass of rhuMAb HER2 applied to the cation exchange resin effects the peak’s
`
`absorbance level at the apex as well as the amount of buffer required to reach the apex. Due to minor peaks which
`
`occur (as best seen in the 30 mg/mL load) in this wash, the apex is defined as absorbance levels of at least 0.5
`
`absorbance units (AU),
`
`Figures 7A and 7B show the amino acid sequences of humMAb4D5-8 light chain (SEQ ID NO: 1) and
`
`humMAb4D5-8 heavy chain (SEQ ID N022), respectively.
`
`Detailed Description Of The Preferred Embodiments
`
`10
`
`Definitions:
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`The “composition” to be purified herein comprises the polypeptide of interest and one or more
`
`contaminants. The composition may be “partially purified” (Le. having been subjected to one or more purification
`
`steps, such as Protein A Chromatography as in Example 1 below) or may be obtained directly from a host cell
`
`or organism producing the polypeptide (e. g. the composition may comprise harvested cell culture fluid).
`
`As used herein, "polypeptide" refers generally to peptides and proteins having more than about ten
`
`amino acids. Preferably, the polypeptide is a mammalian protein, examples of which include renin; a growth
`
`hormone. including human growth hormone and bovine growth hormone; growth hormone releasing factor;
`
`parathyroid hormone; thyroid stimulating hormone; lipoproteins; alpha- 1 -antitrypsin; insulin A-chain; insulin B—
`
`chain; proinsulin; follicle stimulating hormone; calcitonin; luteinizing hormone; glucagon; clotting factors such
`
`as factor VlllC; factor IX, tissue factor, and von Willebrands factor; anti-clotting factors such as Protein C; atrial
`
`natriuretic factor; lung surfactant; a plasminogen activator, such as urokinase or human urine or tissue-type
`
`plasminogen activator (t-PA); bombesin; thrombin; hemopoietic growth factor; tumor necrosis factor-alpha and
`
`-beta; enkephalinase; RANTES (regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted); human
`
`macrophage inflammatory protein (MlP-l-alpha); a serum albumin such as human serum albumin; Muellerian-
`
`inhibiting substance; relaxin A—chain; relaxin B-chain; prorelaxin; mouse gonadotropin-associated peptide; a
`
`microbial protein, such as beta-lactamase; DNase; lgE; a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen (CTLA),
`
`such as CTLA-4; inhibin; activin: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); receptors for hormones or growth
`
`factors; Protein A or D; rheumatoid factors; a neurotrophic factor such as bone-derived neurotrophic factor
`
`(BDNF), neurotrophin-S, -4, -5, or —6 (NT-3, NT-4, NT-5, or NT-6), or a nerve growth factor such as NGF-B;
`
`platelet-derived growth factor (PDG F); fibroblast growth factor such as aFGF and bFGF; epidermal growth factor
`
`(EGF); transforming growth factor (TG F) such as TG F-alpha and TGF-beta, including TGF-B l, TGF-BZ, TG F-
`
`133, TOP-[34, or TGF-BS; insulin-like growth factor-1 and -II (IGF-I and lGF-lI); des(l-3)—IGF-1 (brain IGF-I),
`
`insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs); CD proteins such as CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD20;
`
`erythropoietin; osteoinductive factors; immunotoxins; a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP); an interferon such
`
`as interferon~alpha, -beta, and -gamma; colony stimulating factors (CSFs), e. g., M~CSF, GM-CSF, and G-CSF;
`
`interleukins (ILs), e. g., lL-l to lL—10;superoxide dismutase; T-cell receptors; surface membrane proteins; decay
`
`accelerating factor; viral antigen such as, for example, a portion of the AIDS envelope; transport proteins: homing
`
`receptors; addressins: regulatory proteins; integrins such as CD1 la, CD1 lb, CD1 1c, CD18, an ICAM, VLA-4
`
`and VCAM; a tumor associated antigen such as HER2, HER3 or HER4 receptor; and fragments and/or variants
`4
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 6 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 6 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`of any ofthe above~listed polypeptides. Most preferred is a full length antibody that binds human HER2.
`
`A “contaminant” is a material that is different from the desired polypeptide product. The contaminant
`
`may be a variant of the desired polypeptide (e. g. a deamidated variant or an amino-aspartate variant of the desired
`
`polypeptide) or another polypeptide. nucleic acid. endotoxin etc.
`
`A "variant" or "amino acid sequence variant" of a starting polypeptide is a polypeptide that comprises
`
`an amino acid sequence different from that of the starting polypeptide. Generally, a variant will possess at least
`
`80% sequence identity, preferably at least 90% sequence identity, more preferably at least 95% sequence identity,
`
`and most preferably at least 98% sequence identity with the native polypeptide. Percentage sequence identity is
`
`determined, for example, by the Fitch et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 1382-1386 (1983), version of the
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`algorithm described by Needleman et al., J. Mol. Biol. 48:443-453 (1970), after aligning the sequences to provide
`
`for maximum homology. Amino acid sequence variants of a polypeptide may be prepared by introducing
`
`appropriate nucleotide changes into DNA encoding the polypeptide, or by peptide synthesis. Such variants
`
`include. for example, deletions from, and/or insertions into and/or substitutions of, residues within the amino acid
`
`sequence of the polypeptide of interest. Any combination of deletion, insertion. and substitution is made to arrive
`
`at the final construct. provided that the final construct possesses the desired characteristics. The amino acid
`
`changes also may alter post-translational processes ofthe polypeptide. such as changing the number or position
`
`of glycosylation sites. Methods for generating amino acid sequence variants of polypeptides are described in US
`
`Pat 5,534,615, expressly incorporated herein by reference, for example.
`
`An “acidic variant” is a variant ofa polypeptide ofinterest which is more acidic (e.g. as determined by
`
`cation exchange chromatography) than the polypeptide of interest. An example of an acidic variant is a
`deamidated variant.
`
`A “deamidated” variant of a polypeptide molecule is a polypeptide wherein one or more asparagine
`
`residue(s) ofthe original polypeptide have been converted to aspartate, Le. the neutral amide side chain has been
`
`converted to a residue with an overall acidic character. Deamidated humMAb4D5 antibody from the Example
`
`below has Asn30 in CDRl of either or both of the VL regions thereof converted to aspartate. The term
`
`"deamidated human DNase" as used herein means human DNase that is deamidated at the asparagine residue that
`
`occurs at position 74 in the amino acid sequence of native mature human DNase (US Patent 5,279,823; expressly
`
`incorporated herein by reference).
`
`The term "mixture" as used herein in reference to a composition comprising an anti-HERZ antibody,
`
`means the presence of both the desired anti-HER2 antibody and one or more acidic variants thereof. The acidic
`
`variants may comprise predominantly deamidated anti-HER2 antibody, with minor amounts of other acidic
`
`variant(s). It has been found, for example, that in preparations of anti-HER2 antibody obtained from recombinant
`
`expression, as much as about 25% of the anti-HER2 antibody is deamidated.
`
`In preferred embodiments of the invention,
`
`the polypeptide is a recombinant polypeptide. A
`
`35
`
`“recombinant polypeptide” is one which has been produced in a host cell which has been transformed or
`
`transfected with nucleic acid encoding the polypeptide, or produces the polypeptide as a result of homologous
`
`recombination. "Transformation" and "transfection" are used interchangeably to refer to the process of
`
`introducing nucleic acid into a cell. Following transformation or transfection, the nucleic acid may integrate into
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 7 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 7 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`the host cell genome, or may exist as an extrachromosomalelement. The “host cell” includes a cell in in vitro cell
`
`culture as well a cell within a host animal. Methods for recombinant production of polypeptides are described
`
`in US Pat 5,534,615, expressly incorporated herein by reference, for example.
`
`The term "antibody" is used in the broadest sense and specifically covers monoclonal antibodies
`
`(including full length monoclonal antibodies), polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e. g., bispecific
`
`antibodies), and antibody fragments so long as they exhibit the desired biological activity.
`
`The antibody herein is directed against an “antigen” of interest. Preferably, the antigen is a biologically
`
`important polypeptide and administration of the antibody to a mammal suffering from a disease or disorder can
`
`result in a therapeutic benefit in that mammal. However, antibodies directed against nonpolypeptide antigens
`
`(such as tumor-associatedglycolipid antigens; see US Patent 5,091 , l 78) are also contemplated. Where the antigen
`
`is a polypeptide, it may be a transmembrane molecule (e. g. receptor) or ligand such as a growth factor. Exemplary
`
`antigens include those polypeptides discussed above. Preferred molecular targets for antibodies encompassed by
`
`the present invention include CD polypeptides such as CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD20 and CD34; members of
`
`the HER receptor family such as the EGF receptor, HER2, HER3 or HER4 receptor; cell adhesion molecules such
`
`as LFA-l, Macl, p150.95, VLA—4, ICAM-l, VCAM and av/b3 integrin including either a or b subunits thereof
`
`(e.g. anti-CD1 la, anti—CD1 8 or anti-CD1 lb antibodies); growth factors such as VEGF; IgE; blood group antigens;
`
`flk2/flt3 receptor; obesity (OB) receptor; mpl receptor; CTLA-4; polypeptide C etc. Soluble antigens or fragments
`
`thereof, optionally conjugated to other molecules, can be used as immunogens for generating antibodies. For
`
`transmembrane molecules, such as receptors, fragments of these (e. g. the extracellular domain of a receptor) can
`
`be used as the immunogen. Alternatively, cells expressing the transmembrane molecule can be used as the
`
`immunogen. Such cells can be derived from a natural source (e.g. cancer cell lines) or may be cells which have
`
`been transformed by recombinant techniques to express the transmembrane molecule.
`
`The term "monoclonal antibody" as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of
`
`substantially homogeneous antibodies. i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical
`
`except for possible naturally occurring mutations that may be present in minor amounts. Monoclonal antibodies
`
`are highly specific. being directed against a single antigenic site. Furthermore,
`
`in contrast to conventional
`
`(polyclonal) antibody preparations which typically include different antibodies directed against different
`
`determinants (epitopes), each monoclonal antibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen. The
`
`modifier "monoclonal" indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially
`
`homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any
`
`particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention
`
`may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler et al., Nature 256:495 (1975), or may be made
`
`by recombinant DNA methods (see, e.g., US. Patent No. 4,816,567). In a further embodiment, “monoclonal
`
`antibodies” can be isolated from antibody phage libraries generated using the techniques described in McCafferty
`
`et al., Nature, 348:552-554 (1990). Clackson et al., Nature, 352:624-628 (1991) and Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol,
`
`222158 1-597 (1991) describe the isolation of murine and human antibodies, respectively, using phage libraries.
`
`Subsequent publications describe the production of high affinity (nM range) human antibodies by chain shuffling
`
`(Marks et al., Bio/Technology, 10:779-783 (1992)), as well as combinatorial infection and in vivo recombination
`
`as a strategy for constructing very large phage libraries (Waterhouse et al., Nuc. Acids. Res., 21:2265-2266
`6
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 8 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 8 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`(1993)). Thus, these techniques are viable alternatives to traditional monoclonal antibody hybridoma techniques
`
`for isolation of monoclonal antibodies. Alternatively, it is now possible to produce transgenic animals (e. g., mice)
`
`that are capable, upon immunization, of producing a full repertoire of human antibodies in the absence of
`
`endogenous immunoglobulin production. For example, it has been described that the homozygous deletion of
`
`the antibody heavy-chain joining region (1“) gene in chimeric and germ-line mutant mice results in complete
`
`inhibition of endogenous antibody production. Transfer of the human germ-line immunoglobulin gene array in
`
`such germ—line mutant mice will result in the production of human antibodies upon antigen challenge. See, e. g.,
`
`Jakobovits et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 902255] (1993); Jakobovits et al., Nature, 362:255-258 (1993);
`
`Bruggerrnann et a1., Year in lmmun0., 7:33 (1993); and Duchosal et al. Nature 3552258 (1992).
`
`The monoclonal antibodies herein specifically include "chimeric" antibodies (immunoglobulins) in
`
`which a portion ofthe heavy and/or light chain is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in
`
`antibodies derived from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or subclass, while the
`
`remainder ofthe chain(s) is identical with or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies derived from
`
`another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass, as well as fragments of such antibodies, so
`
`long as they exhibit the desired biological activity (US. Patent No. 4,816,567; and Morrison et al., Proc. Natl.
`
`Acaa’. Sci. USA 81:6851-6855 (1984)).
`
`The term “hypervariable region” when used herein refers to the amino acid residues of an antibody
`
`which are responsible for antigen-binding. The hypervariable region comprises amino acid residues from a
`
`“complementaritydetermining region” or “CDR” (LC. residues 24-34 (L1 ), 50-56 (1.2) and 89-97 (L3) in the light
`
`chain variable domain and 31-35 (H1), 50-65 (H2) and 95-102 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain; Kabat
`
`et a1., Sequences of Polypeptides of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes
`
`of Health. Bethesda. MD. (1991)) and/or those residues from a “hypervariable loop” (Le. residues 26-32 (L1),
`
`50-52 (L2) and 9 1 -96 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 26—32 (H1), 53-55 (H2) and 96-101 (H3) in the
`
`heavy chain variable domain; Chothia and Lesk J. Mol. Biol. 196:901-9 17 (1987)). "Framework" or "FR" residues
`
`are those variable domain residues other than the hypervariable region residues as herein defined. The CDR and
`
`FR residues ofthe rhuMAb HER2 antibody ofthe example below (humAb4D5-8) are identified in Caner et al.,
`
`Proc. Natl. Acaa’. Sci. USA, 8914285 (1992).
`
`"Humanized" forms of non-human (e. g., murine) antibodies are chimeric antibodies that contain minimal
`
`sequence derived from non—human immunoglobulin. For the most part, humanized antibodies are human
`
`immunoglobulins(recipient antibody) in which residues from a hypervariable region ofthe recipient are replaced
`
`by residues from a hypervariable region of a non-human species (donor antibody) such as mouse, rat, rabbit or
`
`nonhuman primate having the desired specificity, affinity, and capacity. In some instances, Fv framework region
`
`(FR) residues of the human immunoglobulin are replaced by corresponding non-human residues. Furthermore,
`
`humanized antibodies may comprise residues which are not found in the recipient antibody or in the donor
`
`antibody. These modifications are made to further refine antibody performance. In general, the humanized
`
`antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains, in which all or
`
`substantially all of the hypervariable loops correspond to those of a non-human immunoglobulin and all or
`
`substantially all of the FR regions are those of a human immunoglobulin sequence. The humanized antibody
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`
`Page 9 of 39
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1013
`Page 9 of 39
`
`

`

`WO 99/57134
`
`PCT/US99/09637
`
`optionally also will comprise at least a portion of an immunoglobulin constant region (Fc). typically that ofa
`
`human immunoglobulin.
`
`The choice of human variable domains, both light and heavy, to be used in making the humanized
`
`antibodies is very important to reduce antigenicity. According to the so-called "best—fit" method, the sequence
`
`of the variable domain of a rodent antibody is screened against the entire library of known human variable-
`
`domain sequences. The human sequence which is closest to that of the rodent is then accepted as the human
`
`framework (FR) for the humanized antibody (Sims et al., J. Immunol, 151 :2296 (1993); Chothia et al., J. Mol.
`
`Biol., 1962901 (1987)).
`
`Another method uses a particular framework derived from the consensus sequence of all human
`
`antibodies of a particular subgroup of light or heavy chains. The same framework may be used for several
`
`different humanized antibodies (Carter 2! (1]., Proc. Natl. Acaa’. Sci. USA, 89:4285 (1992); Presta et al., J.
`
`lmmnol.. 15122623 (1993)).
`
`It is further important that antibodies be humanized with retention of high affinity for the antigen and
`
`other favorable biological properties. To achieve this goal, according to a preferred method, humanized antibodies
`
`are prepared by a process of analysis of the parental sequences and various conceptual humanized products using
`
`three-dimensionalmodels ofthe parental and humanized sequences. Three-dimensional immunoglobulin models
`
`are commonly available and are familiar to those skilled in the art. Computer programs are available which
`
`illustrate and di

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket