throbber
Volume 342 No.6252 21/280ecember1989 $5.75
`
`A“, " .._r,'
`
`LII‘IL Stack}; ‘
`
`IJI‘IIVEI’:3ETY III QELIIIIRI‘ III,
`
`”LILI'
`~
`
`It
`
`RETURN TO
`CIRCULATION DESK
`
`INTERNATIONALWEEKLY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
`
`DRAINAGE PATTERNS
`
`MANTLE PLUMES AND CONTINENTAL
`
`Pfier Ex. 109
`
`Page 1 of 1 1
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 1 of 11
`
`

`

`
`
`nature
`
`21/28 December 1989
`Vol. 342 Issue no. 6252
`
`DRAINAGE PATTERNS 4 The Rio Pelotas in southern Brazil,
`
`along the border between the Santa
`Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul states.
`This river flows west. away from the
`Atlantic, down the flank of a dome of
`basaltic lavas uplifted by a mantle
`plume. See page 873.
`
`
`HUME; A111} commu.
`
`
`THIS WEEK
`
`Volcano predicted
`A ten-year study of the Poas vol-
`cano in Costa Rica provides the
`first unambiguous evidence that
`small changes in gravity can be
`precursors to a volcanic eruption,
`and may be of predictive value.
`Pages 902 and 862.
`
`Setback on male gene
`Genetic evidence strongly sug—
`, gests that the development of
`testes can be determined by a
`region of the Y chromosome that
`,
`‘ does not contain ZFY. thought to
`’ be the testis-determining gene
`(page 937) but which now seems
`in fact to determine spermato—
`genesis (page 940). See also
`News and Views page 860.
`
`Antibody construction
`The hypothesis that a few key
`. conserved residues in the hyper-
`variable
`regions of
`antibody
`genes determine the main chain
`conformation of
`these hyper-
`variable loops is supported by
`Zggctural predictions. see page
`Arresting enzyme
`Self fertilization in many flower-
`ing plants is prevented by self-
`incompatibllity genes with many
`alleles, but it has not been known
`how they work. One of these
`genes was recently isolated from '
`tobacco and is now shown to have
`strong similarity to ribonuclease.
`Ribonuclease
`activity can be
`demonstrated in proteins
`ex-
`tracted from the plant style where
`they presumably act on the pollen
`tube cells to arrest growth. Page
`955.
`
`Rules for waves
`Experiments performed in a wave
`tank show that the moderating
`effect of rain on wave motions is
`exerted by the suppression of
`short-wavelength gravity waves,
`and the accompanying reduction
`in the breaking of long waves.
`The finding affects the validity of
`some remote sensing data, sea
`surface radar imaging and radar-
`based wind
`speed measure-
`ments, page 893.
`Lunar flnd
`Evidence from a thin section of
`the Antarctic meteorite Elephant
`Moraine 87521 shows it to be of
`lunar origin. But unlike previously
`discovered lunar meteorites, it is
`made up of material from a mare
`region, rather than from the high-
`lands. Page 889.
`Signal splicing
`Alternative splicing of the mRNA
`for the 02 dopamine receptor,
`the target of antischlzophrenia
`drugs, gives rise to two forms of
`the receptor, one of which con—
`tains an additional 29 amino-
`acid fragment in a putative signal
`transduction loop. Pages 923,
`926 and 865.
`
`Membrane fusion arrest
`When cells enter mitosis. all
`intracellular membrane traffic is
`halted. Experiments with endo-
`cytic vesicles in vitro suggest that
`the cell-cycle
`control protein
`kinase cdc2 is responsible for
`this inhibition. Page 942.
`
`Enzyme chaperone
`Chaperonins, a ubiquitous class
`of proteins thought to play a part
`in the post-translational folding
`and assembly of other proteins,
`Nitrate source
`facilitate the reconstitution of the
`green-
`The
`‘ozone-unfriendly’
`enzyme
`ribulose bisphosphate
`house gas N20 may be produced
`carboxylase (Rubisco) in a step-
`wise fashion from an unfolded
`in the ocean primarily by produc-
`tion of nitrate (denitrification)
`state in vitro. Page 884.
`not. as was thought, by oxidation
`Guide to Authors
`of
`ammonium (nitrification).
`Facing page 958.
`Page 895.
`l‘Jairire‘m (ISSN 0028-0836) is published weekly on Thursday, exce t the last week in December.
`by Macmillan Magazines Ltd (4 Little Essex Street. London WC-R SLF). Annual subscription
`for USA and Canada US$295 (instilutional/corporate). US$125 (individual making personal
`payment). USA and Canadian orders to: Nature, Subscri
`tion Dept, PO Box 1733. Riverton, NJ
`08077-7331USA. Other orders to Nature, Brunei Roa . Basin stoke. Hams RG21 2X5. UK.
`Second class postage paid at New York, NY 10012 and additional mailing offices. Authorization
`to photoco y material for internal or ersonal use. or internal or personal use of specific clients.
`is granted y Nature to libraries antrothers registered with the Copyright Clearance Center
`cation code {or
`is paid direct to CCC. 21 Congress Street. Salem, MA (11970. USA. ldenti i
`(CCC) Transactional Reporting Service. provided the base tee of $1.
`a copy plus $0.10 a page
`Nature: 0128-0836/89 $1.00 + $0.10. US Postmaster send address changes to: Nature,
`(:5
`Bleecker Street. New York. NY 10012. Published in Japan by Nature Japan KK.. Shin-Mitsuke
`Bldg. 36 Ichiguya Tamachi. Shinjuku-ku. Tokyo 162. Japan. [0 1989 Macmillan Magazines Ltd.
`
`
`NATURE SAYS
`
`We must not forget Sakharov I Gorbachev has problem
`
`841
`
`
`NATURE REPORTS
`
`Moscow’s farewell to Sakharov I DNA fingerprinting trial fails I
`Animal rights I India plans Antarctic base I Patents I Shuttle
`rescue I Cancer drugs restricted I Selling student places
`CORRESPONDENCE
`848
`
`Journals and databanks I Explosives I Embryos I Etc.
`
`842
`
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`The overdose ofdrugs in Japan
`M Fuk ushima
`Reflections on the discovery of fission
`R Peierls
`
`NEWS AND VIEWS
`
`Making authors toe the line
`John Maddox
`Plate tectonics: Helium line in the Banda arc
`Eli A Silver
`Cell biology: Mitosis and membranes
`Graham Warren
`Ecology: Answers that lie in the soil
`Peter D Moore
`Synthetic chemistry: Chemists get topological
`Roland Pease
`Mammalian sex determination: Thumbs down for zinc finger?
`Paul S Burgoyne
`Volcano prediction: Measures of little gravity
`Robert I Tilling
`Immunology: Making antigen-receptor genes
`Gary Rathbun, Frederick W Alt & George D Yancopoulos
`Daedalus: Lifeless prose
`
`SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
`
`D, receptor, a missing exon K A Eidnc, P L Taylor. J Zabavnik.
`P T K Saunders & J D Inglis l Exxon Valdez bird toll
`J F Piatt & C J Lensink
`Bacterial zipper R Giraldo, C Nieto, M-E Fernandez-
`Tresguerres & R Diaz I Which Haldane? R Passmore
`
`BOOK REVIEWS
`
`No Ghost in the Machine: Modern Science and the Brain,
`the Mind and the Soul by R Correrill John Morton
`For lnstructionand Recreation: A Centenary History
`of the Museums Association by G Lewis Carole Scott
`I The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease C R Scriver,
`A L Bequdet, WS Sly & D Valle eds Richard W E Watts
`Mathematical Biology by] D Murray M B Usher
`Prochloron: A Microbial Enigma R A Lewin
`& L Cheng eds T Cavalie r-Smith I Cold Fusion: The Making
`of a Scientific Controversy by F D Pear David Lindlcy
`Empires ofTime: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures
`by A A veni Owen Gingerich
`The Experimental Foundation of Particle Physics
`by R N Cahn D H Perkins I One and Two Dimensional
`NMR Spectroscopy by Arra-ur-Rahman P J Hore
`
`ARTICLES
`
`The role of mantle plumes in the development of continental
`drainage patterns
`K G Cox
`Conformationsol‘ immunoglobulin hypervariable regions
`C Chothia. A M Lesk, A Tramontano, M Levitt, S J Smith-Gill,
`G Air. S Sheriff, E A Padlan. D Davies, W R Tulip, P M Colman,
`S Spinelli. P M Alzari & RJ Poljak
`
`
`
`850
`
`852
`
`855
`
`856
`
`857
`
`858
`
`859
`
`880
`
`862
`
`863
`864
`
`865
`
`866
`
`867
`
`868
`869
`
`870
`
`871
`
`872
`
`873
`
`877>
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 2 of 11
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 2 of 11
`
`

`

`MacLennan
`Blockage 0? 043 T-ceil development by TCR yd transgenes
`M BonneVIlle, I Ishlda, P Mombaerts, M Katsukl, S Verbeek, A
`Berns & S Tonegawa
`A protein binding to the JK recombination sequence of immuno-
`globulin genes contains a sequence related to the integrase motif
`N Matsunami, Y Hamaguchi, Y Yamamoto, K Kuze,
`K Kangawa, H Matsuo, M Kawaichi & T Honjo
`Genetic evidence that ZFY is not the testis-determining factor
`M s Palmer, A H Sinclair, P Berta, N A Ellis, P N Goodfellow,
`N E Abbas & M Fellous
`ny gene expression patterns are not compatible with a primary
`role m mouse sex determination
`P Koopman. J Gubbay, J Collignon & R Lovell-Badge
`Inhibition ofendocytic vesicle fusion in vitra by the cell-cycle
`control protein kinase cdc2
`T'Tuon-llkoskl ' MiA Felix, MPOICB & IGruenberg
`Dissectionol' functional domains ofthe pituitary-speCIfic
`transcription factor (FHF'I
`_
`L E Them” J'I‘ Castrillo, D Wu & M Kan"
`A highly divergent HIV-2 related isolate
`U DFmCh' M AdfimSk" R Kreutz, A Seipp, H Ki'ihnel &
`H Rubsamen-Walgmann
`Isolation and characterization of the G-actin—myosin head
`lex
`comp
`,
`P Chaussepied & A A Kasprzak
`Sensitivity to cyclosporin A is mediated by cyclophilin in
`Neurospora crassa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae
`M Tropschug. l B Barthelmess & W Neupert
`Style self-incompatibility gene products ofNicotiana alata
`are rlhonucleases
`‘
`B A McClure. V Haring. P R Ebert, MA Anderson,
`.
`R J Simpson, .FSakiyama & A E Clarke
`Changes in spinal cord reflexes after cross-anastomoms ol‘
`gunk??? :nd zuscle “CI-1:95 m the adult rat (Erratum)
`B C
`a on
`P D_ Wa
`_
`_
`An optical yield that Increases With temperature In a
`pgotfihgmically Induced enantiomeric Isomenzauon
`0" c
`n
`_
`_
`_
`YInoue, T Yokoyama, N Yamasaki & ATal
`'I he Winter solstice phenomenon at Newgrange, Ireland: acCIdent
`orgsign? (Correction)
`58
`
`T
`ay
`9
`-See News and Views
`
`NEXT WEEK IN NATURE
`.
`.
`.
`The next Issue, dated 4 January 1990 includes items on: The year’s
`
`934
`
`931
`
`940
`
`942
`
`945
`
`948
`
`950
`
`953
`
`955
`
`958
`
`958
`
`889
`
`890
`
`893
`
`'
`
`895
`
`897
`
`900
`
`902
`
`906
`
`908
`
`913
`
`916
`
`918
`
`920
`
`923
`
`'
`
`1
`
`
`
`Mechanism ofantigen-driven selection in germinal centres
`Y-J Liu, D E Joshua, GTWilliams. C A Smith, J Gordon & I C M
`
`929
`
`931
`
`Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate
`cal-boxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin
`Proteins and Mg-ATP
`p Goloubinoff. J T Christeller. A A Gatenby & G H Lorimer
`884
`
`LETTERS TO NATURE
`'
`,
`.
`,
`,
`figugrlbasalt breccia identified among Antarctic meteorites
`“
`e ancy
`.
`,
`Nc¥lg033|efihefl copper oXIde compounds wnh Blo
`or
`I ayers
`,
`,
`.
`.
`Y gORU’a’: mma’lHPTLakag“ 5:512:23 I:h'gak" H Asa“°'
`5“ 333:“ in 52%;! mm
`’3 “e
`M A‘l‘simplispdr 1; 13Thorpe
`Nitrification rates and lsN abundances ofN20 and N0; in the
`western North Pacific
`N Yoshida H Morimoto M Hirano I Koike S Matsuo E Wada
`T 5.aino & A Hat!ori
`‘
`'
`'
`'
`Evidence for a change in the periodicity oftropical climate cycles
`at 2.4 Myr from whole-core magnetic susceptibility measurements
`J Bloemendal & P deMenocal
`Thermal entrainment by deflected mantle plumes
`. M A Richards & R W Griffiths
`Gravity changes as a precursor to volcanic eruption of Paris
`volcano, Costa Rica
`H Rymer & G Brown
`.
`.
`.
`.
`A helium Isotope transect along the lndonesran archipelago
`D R Hilton & H Craig
`Leakage ofhelium from the Pannonian basin
`D J Martel J Deak P Dovenyi F Horwith R K O‘Nions
`E R Oxburgh L Stegena & M étute
`‘
`Boron isotopeievidence for the involvement of non-marine
`.
`. t
`.
`th
`.
`.
`f th B k
`1111
`d
`'ts
`3:332;ng 55:33; E :1 $65215. ore ep05i
`Wavelength sensitivity in blindsight
`P Sioerig & A Cowey
`Arachidonic acid induces a prolonged inhibition ofglutamate
`uptake into glial cells
`B Barbour, M Szatkowski, N Ingledew & D Attwell
`Molecular cloning, expression and regional distribution of rat
`ciliary neurotrophic factor
`K A Stockli, F Lottspeich, M Sendtner. P Masiakowski.
`P Carroll R Ginz D Lindh0|m & H Thoenen
`Alternative splicing directs the expression oftwo Dz dopamine
`receptor isoforms
`-
`c war 2
`2233355,: Sol‘wloff, M-P Marlres, J-F Riou, L] Emorine
`anniversaries l Extendingthegenetic alphabet I Marine bacteria
`Multiple D2 dopamine receptors produced by
`alternative RNA splicing
`i
`.
`.
`926
`EJRbéfifergaJr‘ L D Mchttle, C R Gerfen, L C Mahan &
`
`‘ SUBSCRIPTION
`
`Annual indexes (1971—1988)
` Annual Subscription Rates (including Annual Index)
`
`
`PSA & Canlada
`$ 95
`USSIOrOO each
`nstitutlona corporate rate
`US 2
`-
`-
`-
`ENQ‘ I IRIES
`Individual rate
`US$125
`13?;chgirstIssue facSImile
`
`
`The individual rate is available only to subscribers
`
`
`paying by personal check or personal credit card.
`Orders (wnh remittance) ‘0:
`
`Your mailing label contains your
`
`
`b
`,
`.
`Student rates available on request.
`ggfiflgfion Offices
`.
`aturc
`unique SU SCflpthn
`grders (with payment) 8r subscriptionenquiries to:
`65 Bleecker Street
`
`
`New York,NY10012. USA
`
`’ number
`
`
`Subscription Department
`Tel: (212) 477-9628
`
`
`11:33:31}733
`Details of subscription rates in all other countries
`are available trom this address
`
`
`NJ 08077-7333 USA
`Nature in microform
`Call toll—free (USA only); (800) 524—0384
`
`
`_
`For information contact:
`
`
`Please allow 6-8 weeks for your subscription
`to start.
`University Microfilms International
`
`300 North Zeeb Road
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`Ann Arbor
`Back issues
`
`
`
`US$9.00
`MI 48106, USA
`Binders
`Washington Editorial Office
`Nature
`‘
`
`
` Binder orders to: Nature, Jesse Joneslnd. Dept
`t
`-
`-
`NAT499 E. Erie Ave. Phila. PA 19134 Char e
`
`orders call toll free 1—800—972—5858. Single binder:
`Please make a not: of vour number and quote
`337255;?"3'51'885 Bummg
`
`
`USA $10.95; Canada 31245. Setof Four:
`it whenever you contact us about your
`’
`
`
`
`subscription
`
`
`USA9995; Canada 345 .95.
`Te': (202) 7374355
`
`
`NATURE - VOL 342 ‘ 21/28 DECEMBER 1989
`V“
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 3 of 11
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 3 of 11
`
`

`

`NATURE ~ VOL 342 - 21/28 DECEMBER 198!
`—#
`
`NATURE EDITORIAL OFFICES
`
`
`LONDON: 4 mile Essex Street, WCZR 3LF
`Telephone: (01) 836 6633 Telex: 262024
`Editor: John Maddox
`
`Deputy Editor: Peter Newmark
`Editorial Staff: Peter Aldhous, Philip Ball, Maxine Clarke,
`David Concar, Rosalind Cotter, Laura Garwin, Henry Gee,
`Claire Hooper, Rory Hewlett, Tim Lincoln, Philippa Lloyd,
`Anne Martin, Christine McGourty, Geoffrey North, Roland Pease,
`Miranda Robertson, Teresa Scranney and Charles Wenz
`Art & Design: Nicola Barker, Jaqueline Dowdall and Stephen Sullivar
`Administration: Mary Shechan, Deborah Anderson, Tamara Boakl
`Kathleen Charters, Andrew Clifford, Helen Hagemann,
`Debra Houghton-Webb, Thalia Mitchell, Andrea Passley,
`Maureen Simpson and Julia Wright
`
`WASHINGTON: 1137 National Press Building, DC 20045
`Telephone: (202) 737-2355
`Washington Editor: Alun Anderson
`Associate Editor: David Lindley
`Administration: Penelope Walker, Nadejda Stancioff
`and Lisa Stull
`
`
`MUNICH: Sandstrasse 41, 8000 Munchen 2
`Telephone: (089) 527036
`Munich Correspondent: Steven Dickman
`
`TOKYO: Shin-Mitsuke Building (4F), 3-6 Ichigaya Tamachi,
`Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162
`Telephone: 031-267-8751
`Tokyo Correspondent: David Swinbanks
`Promotion Manager: Koichi Nakamura
`Japan Advertisement Manager: Phillip Hamill
`Administration: Rinoko Asami
`
`
`Managing Director: Ray Barker
`Editorial Director: Mary Waltham
`Marketing Manager: Caroline Moore
`International Advertisement Manager: Fiona Anderson
`International Sales Manager: Julie Bryant
`Sales Executives: Angela Kays, Emma Hipwell and Daryl Rayner
`Classified Advertisement Manager: Julie Skeet
`
`NEW YORK OFFICE: 65 Bleecker Street, New York, NY 10012
`Telephone: (212) 477-9600 Telex: 668497UW
`President: Andy Sutherland
`American Advertising Manager: Henry Dale
`Classified Advertising Manager: Marianne Ettisch
`Circulation Director: James A. Skowrenski
`
`
`CANADA: Display & Classified: Peter Drake, 17 Pine Crescent,
`Toronto, Ontario M4E 1L1—(416)690-2423
`DISPLAY ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVES
`New York: Nature Office
`Chicago: Didier & Broderick, Inc. (708) 498-4520
`West Coast: Marian Delaney and Lynn Stickrod (415) 781-3801
`New England & Mid-Atlantic: Steven Hauck (212) 477 9693
`Southeast: Nature New York Office
`France: Clare Newell (1) 40 53 03 39
`Switzerland: Verena Loewenthal, Interpress, CH-8103 Unterengstringen,
`Zurich (01) 750 5511 Fax (01) 750 2210
`Israel: Daniel Zimet, Zimet Advertising & Publishing (03) 261653 Fax (03) 2
`Japan: Phillip Hamill (03) 267 8751
`Netherlands and Belgium: Adele Struyck, Astra, Netherlands (0343]) 1702
`Scandinavia: Andrew Karnig, Andrew Karnig & Associates,
`Sweden (08) 4400 05
`Germany and Austria: Tel. (089) 524081/ Fax (089) 5232222
`
`Nature63 ISSN 0028-0836
`
`,.
`
`Registered as a news aper at the British Post Office
`© 989 Macmillan
`agazines Ltd
`Vol. 342 No. 6252 21/28 December 1989
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 4 of 11
`
`BWA plIECE
`
`OF HHSTORY
`
`NATURE VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1
`First published Thursday, November 4, 1869
`
`NOW available as a high quality facsimile,
`the first ever issue ofNature containing
`among others J. Norman Lockyer’s
`famous article ‘T116 Recent TotalEclipse ofthe
`Sun’, a report on science teaching in
`schools in 1869 and ‘Tn'assz'cDinosauria’ an
`
`absorbing report by T. H. Huxley.
`This fascinating issue makes a highly original gift
`and an interesting addition to your own collection.
`To obtain your copy simply fill in the form below.
`
`r—_—'T;§a:1r—e,—M—ac-r:ii—ll;l\_d;ga—zin—es Ltd,
`"
`iBrunel Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire RGZI 2X8, UK.
`Please send me ......... facsimile(s)ofthe first issue
`ofNature at a cost per issue of|:| UK $2.50 [I Rest of
`World $4.50 (Surface) E] Rest ofWorld $6.00 (Airmail).
`I enclose a cheque for .................'
`
`II I
`
`I I | I I I I
`
`Address ......................................................
`
`II I
`
`I || | | | |
`
`I
`I
`l—
`
`‘Payment may be made in any currency at the
`prevailing exchange rate. Cheques should be made
`payable to Nature. Prices include postage and packing.
`_________ _____]
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 4 of 11
`
`

`

`1:5. Ollier, C. D, Tectonics and Landforms [Longman New York, 1981),
`26, Fitch, F. J & Miller, J. A Spec, Pub/s geol, Soc. S Afr 13. 247-266 (1984)
`27 Cox, K G J. Petrol 21, 629765011980).
`2H England, P. C, & Molnar. P. Geology (in the press).
`29. Petri. S & Fulfarb. V. J, Geologia do Brasil (Editora da Umversidade de 850 Paulo, 1983).
`30. Tankard, A.
`.l. er al. Crustal Evolution of Southern Africa (Springer, New Vork, 1982).
`31. Craddock. C led) Antarctic Geascrenoe onrversrty of Wisconsin Press. Madison. 1982)
`
`32. King, L, C. South African Scenery 2nd edn (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 1951).
`33, King, L. C, The Morphology of the Earth (Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh, 1962).
`34. Partridge, T. C, [L Maud, R R. S Afr geol. J so. 179-208 (1987).
`35. Cahen, L, Snelling, N. J., DelnaIJ. & Vail, J. R. The Geochrono/ogy and Evolution orArnca (Clarendon.
`Oxford. 1984).
`36, Brown. R. W. 6thlnt. Conf. Fission Track Dating Abstr Vol. Université de Franche-Comté,Besan<;on,
`1988).
`
`
`
`ARTICLES
`
`Conformations of immunoglobulin
`hypervariable regions
`
`Cyrus Chothia‘l, Arthur M. Lesk”, Anna Tramontanoi, Michael Levitt“,
`Sandra J. Smith-Gill“, Gillian Air“, Steven Sheriift’", Eduardo A. Padlan’“,
`David Davies#, William R. Tulip", Peter M. Colman”, Silvia Spinelli“,
`i’edro M. Alzari“ & Roberto J. Poljak“
`"‘ MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK
`3: European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Postfach 1022.09, D6900 Heidelberg, FRG
`§ Department of Cell Biology, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford. California 94305, USA
`+ Christopher Ingold Laboratory. University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WClH OAJ, UK
`ll National Institute of Cancer and # National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
`Maryland 20892, USA
`fl Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA
`tt CSIRO Division of Biotechnology, 343 Royal Parade, Parkville 3052, Australia
`5:: Unite d'lmmunologie Structurale, Département d'lmmunologie, Institut Pasteur. 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris, France
`
`On the basis of comparative studies of known
`antibody structures and sequences it has been
`argued that there is a small repertoire of main-
`chain conformations for at least five of the six
`
`hypervariable regions of antibodies, and that the
`particular conformation adopted is determined by
`a few key conserved residues. These hypotheses
`are now supported by reasonably successful pre-
`dictions of the structures of most hypervariable
`regions of various antibodies, as revealed by
`comparison with their subsequently determined
`structures.
`
`THE relationships between the amino-acid sequences of
`immunoglobulins and the structures of their antigen-binding
`sites are important for understanding the molecular mechanisms
`of the generation and maturation of the immune response and
`for designing engineered antibodies. Antigen-binding sites are
`formed by six loops of polypeptide, the hypervariable regions;
`three from the variable domain ofthe light chain (VL) and three
`from the variable domain of the heavy chain (VH), denoted L1,
`L2, L3, and H1, H2, H3, respectively (Fig. la). Within the
`domains, the loops are connected to a B-shcct framework whose
`structure is conserved "3. The specificity and affinity of the bind-
`ing sites are governed by the structures of the six hypervariable
`regions”.
`Two models can be proposed for the relationship between
`the amino-acid sequence and structure ofthe binding-site loops.
`In one model, different sequences produce different conforma-
`tions for both the main chain and side chains of the loops.
`Because hypervariable regions have different sequences in
`different antibodies, this model implies that each region adopts
`a diiferent conformation in different antibodies. In the other
`
`
`** Present address: The Squibb institute for Medical Research, PO Box 4000,
`Princeton, New Jersey 08543-4000. USA.
`
`NATURE - VOL 342 ~ 21/28 DECEMBER 1989
`
`model, antibodies have only a few main-chain conformations
`or “canonical structures’ for each hypervariable region. Most
`sequence variations would only modify the surface provided by
`the side chains on a canonical main—chain structure. Sequence
`changes at a few specific sets of positions would switch the main
`chain [0 a different canonical conformation.
`
`Canonical structure model
`Experimental evidence indicates that the canonical structure
`model describes the relationship between amino-acid sequence
`and structure for at least five of the six hypervariable regions”.
`Kabat er al.5 found conserved residues at sites within certain
`sets of hypervariable regions and suggested that they had a
`structural role. Padlan and Davies“, and more recently de la
`Paz er al.7, showed that some of the hypervariable regions
`in the immunoglobulins of known structure have the same
`main-chain conformation in spite of several differences in
`sequence.
`
`Chothia and Lesk" identified the residues that through pack-
`ing, hydrogen bonding, or the ability to assume unusual values
`of the torsion angles 45,
`ll: or w, are primarily responsible for
`the main—chain conformations of the hypervariable regions in
`the structures then known—the Fab fragments of NEW (ref.
`10), McPC603 (ref. 1|), KOL (ref. 12) and J539 (ref. 13) and
`the VL domains of REI
`(ref. 14) and RHE (ref. 15). The
`conformations are determined by the interactions of a few
`residues at specific sites in the hypervariable regions and, for
`certain loops, in the framework regions. Hypervariable regions
`that have the same conformations in different immunoglobulins
`have the same or very similar residues at these sites (Fig. 1 and
`Table 1). Examination of the amino-acid sequence of the anti-
`body D1.3 showed that its hypervariable regions are the same
`size as those in known structures and contain the same or similar
`residues at the sites responsible for known conformation59. On
`the basis ofthese observations the atomic structure ofthe VL-VH
`dimer of D1.3 was predicted before its experimental determina-
`tion. Comparison ofthis predicted structure with the preliminary
`crystal structure showed that the conformations of four of the
`hypervariable regions had been predicted correctly; the confor-
`mation of L3 was significantly different from that predicted, and
`877
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 5 of 11
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 5 of 11
`
`

`

`ARTICLES
`
`
`TABLE 1 Sequences and conformations of VK and VH hypervariable regions of known structure
`L1 Regions‘i
`Canonical
`Structure
`
`29
`3F
`V
`V
`V
`i
`i
`i
`V
`L
`L
`
`30
`
`S
`N
`R
`|
`H
`G
`S
`L
`V
`
`Blabcdef32 2253371
`****
`
`SIALY
`firereiieViAMY
`———-————Y|AMY
`K—————-VIALY
`N—i—«———Y|ALY
`N—————————NIALF
`T—.———v-—AIALY
`NSGN KNFiSLF
`H5-
`(3
`TY VSLF
`
`Protein
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`4
`
`J539
`HyHEL»5
`NQlO
`RE!
`01.3
`HyHEL-iO
`NC41
`McPCGOB
`4-4-20
`
`S
`S
`S
`5
`S
`S
`S
`S
`5
`
`S
`S
`S
`Q
`G
`Q
`0
`E
`Q
`
`S
`S
`S
`D
`N
`S
`D
`S
`S
`
`'otal no. of sequences known for L1 regions: human, 95; mouse. 299.
`Canonical structure
`1
`2
`3
`4
`Human sequences that fit (96)
`—
`60
`5
`5
`Mouse sequences that tit (%)
`15
`25
`20
`10
`
`64
`il<
`
`ccsccceG<
`
`3
`
`A00
`
`___._.__—__...*
`
`50
`
`51
`
`52
`
`E
`G
`E
`Y
`o
`Y
`W
`D
`K
`
`A
`A
`i
`T
`T
`A
`A
`T
`V
`
`S
`S
`S
`T
`s
`S
`S
`S
`8
`
`Protein
`
`REI
`McPC603
`J539
`D13
`HyHEL—S
`HyHEL-1O
`NC41
`N010
`4-4.20
`
`L2 Regions
`Canonical
`Structure
`
`1
`
`Total no. of sequences known for L2 regions; human, 69: mouse. 183.
`Canonical structure
`1
`Human sequences that fit (Va)
`95
`Mouse sequences that fit (96)
`95
`
`L3 Regions
`Canonical
`Structure
`
`1
`
`2
`3
`
`Protein
`
`RE
`McPCGO3
`D1.3
`Hyi-EL-lo
`NC41
`4-4-20
`N010
`1539
`HyHEL-5
`
`91
`
`92
`
`93
`
`94
`
`Y
`D
`F
`S
`H
`5
`W
`w
`w
`
`Q
`H
`W
`N
`Y
`T
`S
`r
`G
`
`S
`S
`S
`s
`S
`H
`S
`Y
`R
`
`L
`Y
`T
`W
`P
`V
`N
`i3
`N
`
`9596
`l“
`FY
`PL
`PR
`PY
`PW
`PW
`PL
`LI
`t
`p,
`
`90
`4
`Q
`N
`H
`Q
`Q
`Q
`Q.
`Q
`t
`o
`
`Total no. of sequences known for L3 regions: human, 52; mouse, 152.
`Canonical structure
`1
`2
`3
`Human sequences that fit (96)
`90
`—
`2
`Mouse sequences that fit (%)
`80
`10
`1
`
`“m
`
`Hl had a very different fold from that predicted". (We report
`below that the refined conformation of D13 corresponds more
`closely to the predicted structure.)
`An examination ofthe library of the known immunoglobulin
`sequences shows that many immunoglobulins have hyper-
`variable regions that are the same size as those in the known
`structures and contain the same or closély related residues at
`the sites responsible for the known conformationss. These
`observations indicate that for at least five of the hypervariable
`regions there is only a small repertoire of canonical main-chain
`conformations and that the conformation actually present can
`often be predicted from the sequence by the presence of specific
`residues.
`
`for
`structure model
`canonical
`the
`accuracy of
`The
`immunoglobulin binding sites depends on (1) the correct deter~
`878
`
`mination of the sets of residues responsible for the observed
`conformations and (2) changes in the identity of residues at
`other sites not significantly affecting the conformations of the
`canonical structures. The model can be tested, refined and
`extended by using it to predict the atomic structures of binding
`sites in immunoglobulins before their structures have been deter-
`mined by X-ray crystallography
`We have now tested the canonical structure model by using
`it to predict the structures of four immunoglobulins before their
`structures
`had
`been
`experimentally
`determined. These
`immunoglobulins are HyHEL-S (ref. 16), HyHEL-IO (ref. 17),
`NC41 (ref. 18) and NQlO (S.S., P.M.A. and R.J.P., manuscript
`in preparation). The analysis of the amino-acid sequences of
`these immunoglobulins indicated that 19 of their 24 hypervari-
`able regions should have conformations close to known canoni—
`
`NATURE - VOL 342 - 21/28 DECEMBER 1989
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 6 of 11
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 6 of 11
`
`

`

`AR l'ICLES
`
`
`H1 Regionsi
`Canonical
`Structure
`
`1
`
`1'
`
`Protein
`
`McPC603
`KOL
`1539
`01.3
`HyHEL-S
`NC41
`N010
`4-4-20
`NEW
`HyHEL-lo
`
`26
`it
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`G
`
`27
`*
`F
`F
`F
`F
`Y
`Y
`F
`F
`S
`D
`
`28
`
`T
`I
`D
`S
`T
`T
`T
`T
`T
`S
`
`29
`at
`F
`F
`F
`L
`F
`F
`F
`F
`F
`l
`
`S
`, S
`S
`T
`S
`T
`S
`S
`S
`T
`
`Total no. of sequences known for H1 regions: human. 50; mouse, 321.
`Canonical structure
`1
`Human sequences that fit (%)
`50
`Mouse sequences that fit (%)
`80
`
`H2 Regions§
`Canonical
`Structure
`
`Protein
`
`523
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`NEW
`01.3
`HyHEL-lO .
`
`HyHEL—S
`NC41
`
`KOL
`J539
`NQiO
`
`McPC603
`44120
`
`—
`
`—
`3k
`P
`T
`
`D
`P
`S
`
`N
`N
`
`b
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`—
`
`—
`—~
`—
`
`K
`K
`
`c
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`—
`
`—
`——
`—
`
`G
`P
`
`53
`
`54
`
`Y
`G
`Y
`
`G
`N
`
`D
`D
`G
`
`N
`Y
`
`H
`D
`S
`
`S
`T
`1*)
`G
`S
`S
`(1:)
`K
`N
`
`30
`
`31
`
`32
`
`34
`*
`M
`M
`M
`V
`I
`M
`M
`M
`Y
`W
`
`94
`1!
`Fl
`R
`R
`R
`R
`R
`R
`G
`R
`N
`
`F
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`Y
`F
`Y
`D
`D
`
`D
`S
`K
`G
`D
`N
`S
`D
`N
`D
`
`55
`i.
`G
`G
`G
`(t)
`G
`G
`
`S
`G
`S
`iv
`Y
`Y
`
`71
`
`e
`A
`L
`r
`R
`R
`R
`in
`
`R
`
`Total no. of sequences known for H2 regions: human, 54: mouse, 248.
`Canonical structure
`1
`2
`3
`’
`4
`Human sequences that fit (96)
`15
`1
`40
`15
`Mouse sequences that fit (96)
`15
`40
`5
`2O
`
`The residues listed here (single-letter code) are those that form the hypervariable regions and those in the framework regions that are important for the observed conformations
`of these regionsa. The hypervariable regions are taken as those outside the framework B-sheeta. Except for H2, they are similar to, but not identical with the regions that show
`high sequence variations and which Kabat et al.26 use to define hypervariable regions. The sequences are grouped so that those that have the same main-chain conformation.
`or canonical structure, are adjacent. The canonical structure numbers used below refer to the conformations shown in Fig. 1. The residues in the hypervariable and framework
`regions that are mainly responsible lor these conformationsB are indicated by an asterisk. The classification and sequence requirements of the H2 conformations have been
`revised in the light of work described here and elsewhere“. For each hypervariable region the number of human and mouse sequences listed by Kabat et 3126 are given, We
`also give the percentage of these sequences that are the same size as the known canonical structures and have the same residues at the positions marked by an asterisk.
`i Canonical structure ‘4 is illustrated in Fig. 4. Although the size of the known L1 structures varies between 6 and 13 residues, they have closely related folds with residues
`26—19 and 32 packed against the framework in the same conformations, The remaining residues form a turn or loop on the surface (Figs 1 and 4). The ends of the long loops
`have some flexibility. There are another 25% of the human sequences and 20% of the mouse sequences that have one more residue than structure 2, or one fewer than structure
`4, and whose sequences satisfy the requirements listed above. It is expected that these differ only in the conformations of the tips of the surface loops.
`IThe H1 nypervariable regions with canonical structure 1 have very similar conformations: the r.m.s. differences in the coordinates of their main‘chain atoms are 0.3—0.8 A.
`The H1 regions in NEW and l-IyHEL-lO only partly satisfy the sequence requirements for structure 1 and have a distorted version of its conformation.
`§The H2 region here comprises residues 523755. The region with high sequence variation is 50—65 (ref. 26).
`In the known structures the main—chain conformation of 50—52
`and 56—63 do not differ significantly3 (Fig. 1b). (*1 The residues at positions 55 or 54 in the canonical structures 2, 3 and 4 have residues with positive values for as and ll],
`and usually. but not in all cases. Gly, Asn or Asp is found at these sites. For a sequence to match that of canonical structure 2, 3 or 4 the presence of these residues at sites
`54 or 55 is required.
`
`cal structures. We then compared the predicted structures of
`these hypervariable regions with the subsequently determined
`structures. Another immunoglobulin structure, 4-4-20 (ref. 19)
`has recently been reported. We did not have the opportunity to
`predict the structure of4-4—20 before its experimental determina-
`tion, and we discuss here only how its hypervariable regions
`have the conformations expected from the known canonical
`structures. Also, we report that the refined conformation of D1,}
`(ref. 20) corresponds more closely to the predicted structure.
`
`MOdel building p'ocedure
`Thc main-chain conformations of the hypervariablc regions in
`the VK and VH domains of known structure are shown in Fig.
`1. The residues responsible for these conformations are listed
`NATURE . VOL 342 . 21/28 DECEMBER 1989
`
`in Table 1. Each hypervariable region in the immunoglobulins
`of unknown structure was examined to determine (1) Whether
`it has the same size as any homologous hypervariable region of
`known structure and (2) whether its sequence contains the set
`of residues responsible for a known conformation. Except for
`L3 in HyHEL-S, all the light-chain regions correspond to a
`known canonical structure, as do all the H1 regions and the H2
`region in HyHELJO (Table 1). The conformation predicted for
`the H2 regions in NC41 and HyHEL-S was based on the analysis
`of the H2 region in the preliminary structure of .1539 (ref. 8).
`in all three of these antibodies the H2 region is a four-residue
`turn with Gly at the fourth position and the predicted conforma-
`tion is that almost always found for such turns“. (Below we
`present a more accurate analysis of H2 regions.) For H3 regions
`in HyHEL-S, HyHEL-lO, NC41 and N010, no prediction of
`879
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`
`Page 7 of 11
`
`Pfizer Ex. 1009
`Page 7 of 11
`
`

`

`ARTICLES
`
`
`conformation could be made on the basis ofthe known canonical
`structures.
`
`The sequences of the VL and VH domains were compared to
`see which of the known framework structures have sequences
`close to those ofthe unknown structures. From the comparisons
`
`of the hypervaria

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket