throbber
400000146001 itNA DEC 90
`STE ENBOCK ME,M,LA 4
`U N I V OF0141( 041AU WM LIBRAR
`550 dABCOCK DR
`MADISON (cid:9)
`
`mivewt4 T93606
`
``1310
`R
`
`Ex. 1041 - Page 1
`
`

`

`nature of nature
`
`18 May 1989
`Vol. 339 Issue no. 6221
`
`KEMAL AXON GUIDANCE
`
`A red-labelled axon coursing through
`a transplant (blue) in embryonic
`Xenopus brain. Rotation of portions of
`optic tract in the embryo deflects
`neurons growing from the retina
`towards the optic tectum, showing
`that growing axons are guided by
`local cues. See page 218.
`
`THIS WEEK
`
`Fusion doubts grow
`Workers from MIT's Plasma Fusion
`Center conclude that the y-ray
`spectral line observed in the
`Fleischmann—Pons cold-fusion
`experiment was "specious",
`page 183. See also News pages.
`Bees heading north
`African honey bees released in
`Brazil 30 years ago are now
`migrating through Central Mexico
`ata rate of 300 miles per year, so
`are expected in Texas by mid-
`1990. This threatens commercial
`bee-keeping as these bees are
`more difficult to manage than
`other types. New evidence
`suggests that the African bees
`are spreading as an essentially
`intact population, displacing the
`European gene pool rather than
`mating with European swarms.
`Pages 211, 213 and 181.
`A bright Idea
`The conversion of sunlight to
`laser light, the destruction of
`hazardous waste, and the pro-
`duction of high-tensile-strength
`fibres are among the possible
`applications for the high-flux
`solar concentrator, described on
`page 198. This device can con-
`centrate terrestrial sunlight by a
`factor of 56,000, producing an
`irradiance in excess of that of the
`solar surface.
`Enterotoxins and HLA
`A direct demonstration that
`staphylococcal enterotoxins bind
`with high affinity to HLA-DR, and
`must be intact to stimulate T
`cells, is presented on page 221.
`Antigen processing
`The fungal antibiotic brefeldin A,
`which blocks transport out of
`the endoplasmic reticulum,
`reversibly inhibits the presenta-
`tion of cytosolically-synthesized
`antigen in association with MHC
`class I molecules. Page 223.
`
`Vitamin deficiency
`Retinoic acid potentiates the
`production of growth hormone in
`response to thyroid hormone or
`glucocorticoids in vitro, suggest-
`ing that vitamin A deficiency may
`explain in part the lower growth
`rate of malnourished children,
`page 231.
`Zeolite catalysis
`Nuclear magnetic resonance
`reveals the fate of 29 organic
`species in the adsorbed phase
`during zeolite ZSM-5 catalysed
`conversion of methanol to hydro-
`
`carbons. The technique provides
`clues as to reaction pathways on
`molecular sieves and should
`assist the design of new shape-
`selective catalysts, page 200.
`Enzyme catalysis
`Altering specific residues in the
`active site of a serine protease
`unexpectedly broadens its sub-
`strate specificity. Structural
`studies show that this effect is
`probably due to increased flexi-
`bility of the active site 'specificity
`pocket', which in mutant proteins
`can accommodate substrates of
`various sizes. Page 191.
`Storing memories
`Long-term potentiation of synap-
`tic strengths has long been
`regarded as a possible mech-
`anism of storing information in
`the nervous system. Theoretical
`studies indicate that selective
`depression of synaptic efficacy
`is also required for efficient
`memory storage. Long-term de-
`pression is now demonstrated
`experimentally, pages 215 and
`175.
`Guide to Authors
`Vol. 339, page 76.
`
`Nature, (ISSN 0028-0836) is published weekly on Thursday. except the last week in December.
`by Macmillan Magazines Ltd (4 Little Essex Street, London WC2R 3LF). Annual subscription
`for USA and Canada US$275 (institutional/corporate), US$125 (individual making personal
`Dyment). USA and Canadian orders to: 'Nature, Subscription Dept, PO Box 1733, Riverton, NJ
`1188077-7333, USA. Other orders to Nature, Brunel Road. Basingstoke, Hants RG21 2XS, UK.
`Second class postage paid at New York. NY 10012 and additional mailing offices. Authorization
`to Photocopy material for internal or personal use, or internal or personal use of specific clients.
`1., I, granted by Nature to libraries and others registered with the Copyright Clearance Center
`(CCC) Transactional Reporting Service. provided the base fee of $1.00 a copy plus $0.10 a page
`I' Paid direct to CCC, 21 Congress Street. Salem, MA 01970, USA. Identification code for
`Nature: 0028-0836/89 $1.00 + $0.10. US Postmaster send address changes to: Nature, 65
`nleecker Street, New York, NY 10012. Published in Japan by Nature Japan K.K., Shin-Mitsuke
`Bldg, 36 Ichigaya Tamachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162. Japan. ©1989 Macmillan Magazines Ltd.
`
`NATURE SAYS
`Congressional committees do not make good referees
`• Nuclear weapons negotiations are needed
`within NATO
`
`161-162
`
`NATURE REPORTS
`Baltimore hearing ends • Peer review considered •
`One UK research council? Irish research • Money for
`Landsat? • Computer standards row • More money for
`Australian science • Cold fusion abandoned in Japan •
`Movement on climatic change • Chinese student protests
`• Fire kills laboratory mice • Indian agency blasted • No
`163-169
`norms for HDTV (cid:9)
`
`CORRESPONDENCE
`Including: Defining entropy • Peer review of fusion? •
`Moral responsibility • Selfish academics (cid:9)
`
`COMMENTARY
`With dosimeter in the sarcophagus
`Yuri Kanin (cid:9)
`
`NEWS AND VIEWS
`Understanding hydrogen bonds
`John Maddox
`Zeolites: Shaping up for catalysis
`John Dwyer
`Memory: Must what goes up come down?
`Richard G M Morris & David J Willshaw
`Anthropology: A tale of three cities
`J S Jones
`Mid-ocean ridges: Anatomy of the magma reservoir
`Ken C Macdonald
`Epstein—Barr virus: Synthesis for a complex role
`Bill Sugden
`Ceramic microcoils sprung for action
`No new fusion under the Sun
`Bertil Wilner
`Quantum optics: Laser gain without inversion
`Peter Knight
`Evolution: Neotropical African bees
`Robert E Page Jr
`Daedalus: Dry drinking
`
`SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
`Problems with the y-ray spectrum in the Fleischmann et al.
`experiments R D Petrasso, X Chen, K W Wenzel,
`R R Parker, C K Li & C Fiore
`Fusion in from the cold? R Seitz • Mossbauer cancer
`therapy doubts D J Brenner, C R Geard & E J Hall
`Surface-plasmon microscopy W Hickel, D Kamp &
`W Knoll
`
`170
`
`171
`
`173
`
`174
`
`175
`
`176
`
`178
`
`179
`179
`
`180
`
`181
`
`181
`182
`
`183
`
`185
`
`186
`
`BOOK REVIEWS
`James J Gibson and the Psychology of Perception
`by E S Reed Brian Rogers
`RNA Genetics E Domingo et al. eds Stephen C Inglis
`A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution by C P Groves
`Bernard Wood
`Is Science Necessary? Essays on Science & Scientists
`by M FPerutz Desmond King-Hele
`
`187
`188
`
`189
`
`190 ►
`
`Ex. 1041 - Page 2
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`by the newly described ER degradation system29•30. We have
`recently demonstrated that whether or not a protein within the
`ER is degraded can be directly correlated with the state of
`assembly of that protein'' and an analogous process for antigen
`would result in the degradation of any peptide that is not stably
`bound to class I molecules. The peptide-MHC complex then
`leaves the ER and travels through the Golgi apparatus to the
`plasma membrane. This model provides multiple testable
`hypotheses about the cell biology of endogenous antigen pres-
`entation which we are currently examining. (cid:9) q
`
`Received 31 January; accepted 6 April 1989.
`
`1. Unanue E. R. A. Rev. Immun. 2, 395 (1984).
`2. Morrison, L. A., Lukacher, A. E., Braciale, V. L., Fan, D. P. & Braciale. T. J. .1 exp. Med. 163, 903-921
`(1986).
`3. Yewdell, J. W., Bennink, J. F. & Hosaka. Y. Science 239, 637-640 (1988).
`4. Shimonkevitz, R., Colon, S.. Kappler, J. W. & Grey, H. M. J. lmmun. 133, 2067-2074 (1984).
`5. Maryanski, J. L, Pala, P., Corrudin, G., Jordan, B. R. & Cerrotini, J. C. Nature 324, 578-579 (1986).
`6. Townsend, A. R. M. et al. Cell 44,959-968 (1986).
`7. Gotch, F., Rothbard, J., Howland. K.. Townsend, A. & McMichael, A. Nature 326, 881-882 (1987).
`8. Babbitt. B. P., Allen, P. M., Matsueda, G.. Haber, E. & Unanue. E. R. Nature 317, 359-361 (1985).
`9. Guillet..1.-G., Lai, M.-L, Barter. T. J., Smith, J. A. & Getter, M. L. Nature 324, 260-262 (1986).
`10. Buus. S., Sette, A.. Colon. S., Jenis, D. M. & Grey. H. M Cell 47, 1071-1077 (1986).
`
`11. Townsend, A. R. M., McMichael, A. J., Carter, N. P., Huddleston, J. A. & Brownlee. G. G. Cell 39,
`13-25 (1984).
`12. Gotch, F., McMichael, A., Smith, G. & Moss, B. J. exp. Med. 165, 408-416 (1987).
`13. Townsend, A. R. M., Gotch. F. M. & Davey, J. Cell 42, 457-467 (1985).
`14. Townsend, A. R. M., Bastin, J., Gould, K. & Brownlee, G. G. Nature 324, 575-577 (1986).
`15. Townsend, A. et al. J. exp. Med. 168, 1211-1224 (1988).
`16. Moore, M. W., Carbone, F. R. & Bevan, M. J. Cell 54, 777-785 (1988).
`17. Takatsuki, A. & Tamura, G. Agric. Biol. Chem. 49, 899-902 (1985).
`18. Misumi, Y. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11398-11403 (1986).
`19. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Yuan, L C., Bonifacino, J. S. & Klausner, R. D. Cell 66, 801-813 (1989,
`20. Kornfeld, R. & Kornfeld, S. A. Rev. Biochem. 64, 631-664 (1985).
`21. Hogan, K. T. et al. .1 exp. Med 168, 725-736 (1988).
`22. Palese, P., Tobita, K., Ueda, M., & Cornpans, R. W. Virology 61, 397-410 (1974).
`23. Matlin. K. & Simons. K. Cell 34, 233-243 (1983).
`24. Owen. M. J., Kissonerghis, A.-M., & Lodish, H. F. J. biol. Chem. 255, 9678-9684 (1980).
`25. Samelson, L. E.. Germain, R. N. & Schwartz, R. H. Proc. natn Acad. Sci. USA. 80, 6972-6976 (1983
`26. Ashwell, J. D., Cunningham, R. E., Noguchi, P. D. & Hernandez, D. J. exp. Med. 165, 173-194 (1.987,
`27. Bonifacino, J. S., Suzuki, C. K., Lippincott-Schwartz. J., Weissman. A. M. & Klausner, R. D. J. Ce-',
`Biol. (in the press).
`28. Walter, P. & Lingappa, V. R. A. Rev. Cell Biol. 2, 499-516 (1986).
`29. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Bonifacino, J. S., Yuan, L C. & Klausner, R. D. Cell 54, 209-220 (1g881
`30. Chen, C., Bonifacino. J. S., Yuan, L. C. & Klausner. R. D. J. Cell Biol. 107, 2149-2161 (1988),
`31. Cowan, E. P.. Jelachich, M. L., Coligan, J. E. & Biddison, W. E. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`5014-5018 (1987).
`32. Samelson, L E., Harford, J. B. & Klausner, R. D. Cell 4.3, 223-231 (1985).
`33. Sussman, J. J. et at. Cell 52, 85-95 (1988).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We wish to thank Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz. Eric Long, and Jonathan
`Ashwell for discussions and Richard Turner for technical assistance. Anti-influenza Monociong
`antibodies were the gifts of Dr. R. Webster. Brefeldin A was the gift of the Sandoz Co.
`
`Isolation of CD4- CD8-
`mycobacteria-reactive T
`lymphocyte clones from
`rheumatoid arthritis
`synovial fluid
`Joseph Holoshitz*, Frits Koningtt, John E. Coligant,
`Jacqueline De Bruyn§ & Samuel Strober*
`
`* Department of Medicine, Stanford University,
`Stanford, California 94305, USA
`t Biological Resources Branch, National Institutes of Allergy and
`Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
`§ Pasteur Institute of Brabant, Brussels, Belgium
`
`THE majority of peripheral T cells express a heterodimeric, a/13
`T-cell receptor, which recognizes specific antigenic peptides bound
`to self major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, and
`either the CD4 or CD8 surface markers. An additional subset of
`T cells1'2, whose physiological function is unknown, express a
`distinct CD3-associated receptor composed of y and 6 chains'.
`This subset includes cells lacking both CD4 and CD8 surface
`markers, which may be involved in autoimmunity3-6. The recogni-
`tion specificity of the y/6 receptor is not well characterized and
`has been defined in only one case to date, a murine cell line which
`shows MHC-linked specificity'. In this report, we describe the
`isolation of CD4- CD8-, y/8 TCR bearing T cell clones from
`the synovial fluid of a rheumatoid arthritis patient. These T cell
`clones respond specifically to mycobacterial antigens without
`MHC restriction.
`Our reasons for cloning these cells in the presence of mycobac-
`terial antigens were twofold. First, synovial cells, although poor
`responders to mitogens such as phytohaemagglutinin (ref. 8) or
`anti-CD3 antibodies9, have been shown to respond vigorously
`to mycobacterial antigens"°. Second, the association between
`the immune response to mycobacterial antigens and HLA-DR4
`(ref. 11), a class II MHC antigen commonly associated with
`rheumatoid arthritis'', suggested that this immune response
`might be related to the pathology of the disease. The proliferative
`
`# Present address: Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Bank, Bldg 1, E3-Q, University
`Hospital, 2300 RC Leiden. The Netherlands.
`
`226 (cid:9)
`
`responses of fresh synovial cells obtained from a 44-year-old
`patient with early rheumatoid arthritis are shown in Table I.
`There was a significant response to the acetone-precipitable
`fraction of mycobacterium tuberculosis (AP-MT) by synovial
`fluid cells but not by cells from the peripheral blood.
`To enrich for AP-MT reactive T cells, a T-cell line was estab-
`lished from this patient by repeated stimulations of synovial
`fluid T cells with AP-MT in the presence of irradiated,
`autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The resultant
`line, JBT1, had a mixed phenotype. Flow cytometric analysis
`showed that 73% of the cells were CD4+CD8- and 23% were
`CD4-CD8- (Table 1). In unselected synovial fluid the per-
`centage of double negative cells was 11% and in peripheral
`blood it was 6%. Thus, double negative T cells were found in
`a higher percentage in the synovial fluid, and proliferated follow-
`ing repeated stimulations with the mycobacterial antigen
`AP-MT.
`We cloned line JBT1 by the limiting dilution technique and
`propagated fourteen clones successfully. Of the five that have
`been studied in detail, four were found to be double negative,
`whereas the fifth was found to have the CD4+CD8- phenotype.
`Figure 1 shows the fluorescence profiles of the CD4± clone 1.1
`and a representative double negative clone designated 1.2. All
`clones expressed CD2 and CD3 surface markers as well as DR
`antigens and IL-2 receptors but the double negative clones
`expressed neither CD4 nor CD8 (Fig. 1). Both types of clones
`did not stain positively with the following monoclonal anti-
`bodies: anti-Leu 7 or anti-Leu 9 (NK markers), anti-Leu 8
`(suppressor inducer marker), anti-Leu 12 (B cell marker) (data
`not shown). Whereas the CD4+ clone stained positively with
`anti-Leu 1 (CD5), the double-negative clones showed either dull
`or negative staining with this monoclonal antibody (not shown).
`The surface expression of T-cell receptor (TCR) chains was
`examined by staining with monoclonal antibodies. These
`included WT31, specific for an a//3 TCR framework deter-
`minant"; Ti-y A, specific for TCR y-chain14• and two mono-
`clonal antibodies specific for TCR 8-chain, 8 TCS1 (ref. 15)
`and TCR 81 (ref. 16). Flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 2a) showed
`that clone 1.1, a CD4± clone, had an alfl TCR, whereas the
`four double negative clones expressed y/6 heterodimers, as
`indicated by positive staining with both Ti-y A and TCR81 and
`no staining with WT31 antibody (Fig. 2a). The, S TCS1 anti•
`body, which binds many y/ 6 bearing cells", did not stain any
`of our y/6 T cell clones (Fig. 2a), although it stained PEER
`cells (not shown). It is conceivable that our double-negative
`clones express a different V8 gene product.
`
`NATURE • VOL 339 • 18 MAY 1989
`
`Ex. 1041 - Page 3
`
`

`

`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`irnmunoprecipitation analysis using anti-peptide antisera was
`carried out to confirm that the CD3-associated TCR complexes
`expressed by the 1.2, 1.3, and 1.6 T cell clones represent y/5
`TCR complexes (Fig. 2b). Both the anti-TCR-y and anti-TCR-8
`sera precipitated the CD3-associated TCR, indicating that this
`receptor is a y/5 TCR. Because both antisera precipitate the
`1/5 complex it is not possible (without results of further experi-
`ments which are in progress) to determine which of the observed
`bands is y or 5.
`
`The increase in the percentage of double-negative T cells
`following repeated restimulations of the synovial fluid T cells
`with the mycobacterial antigen AP-MT (Table 1) suggested that
`the double-negative cells proliferated in response to AP-MT.
`To test this possibility, we measured proliferation of different
`clones to AP-MT using the thymidine incorporation assay (Table
`2). Both clone 1.1 of the CD4±, a/p TCR phenotype, and the
`four double-negative y/8 TCR clones proliferated in response
`to AP-MT. This proliferation was antigen-specific as the y/8
`
`CD2
`
`CD3
`
`CD4
`
`CD8
`
`DR (cid:9)
`
`IL-2R
`
`.•••••to (cid:9)
`
`411
`
`1.1
`
`1.2
`
`Relative number of cells
`
`Fluorescence Intensity
`
`I FIG. 1 FCM analysis of the surface marker phenotype of two representative
`
`clones. Five out of the fourteen clones obtained were studied more exten-
`sively. One clone, 1.1, was found to be of the CD4+ phenotype and four
`dones4.2.4.3, 1.4 and 1.6, had the double-negative phenotype represented
`rere by clone 1.2. Fluorescence intensity (x axis) as a function of relative
`cell number (y axis) of test antibodies (solid line) superimposed on back-
`ground fluorescence intensity obtained with isotype matched control anti-
`bodies (broken line) are shown.
`METHODS. The JBT1 T cell line was cloned by the limiting dilution technique
`based on the method described by Ottenhof et .31.21, with slight modifications.
`Briefly, viable JBT1 cells purified by Flaill gradient were diluted to give 0.5
`cells per 0.1 ml and plated into flat-bottom 96-microtitre plates (Costar), at
`
`0.1 ml per well over a feeder cell mixture, which consisted of autologous
`irradiated EBV-transformed B cells (106 cells m1-1), peripheral blood mononu-
`clear cells from three random donors (106 cell m1-1) and AP-MT (10 µg m1-1).
`Twenty-one wells contained growing cultures out of 96 wells originally
`seeded. Of these, fourteen clones were successfully propagated by repeated
`weekly cycles of restimulation with the feeder/antigen mixture, followed by
`expansion in IL-2-containing medium, The phenotypic analysis was done
`7-10 days after restimulation. Indirect flow cytometric analysis included the
`following monoclonal antibodies at the first stage: OKT 11 (anti-CD2, Ortho
`Diagnostics), anti-Leu 4 (CD3), anti-Leu 3 (CD4), anti-Leu 2 (CD8), L243
`(anti-DR), anti IL-2 receptor (all from Becton-Dickinson). For second stage,
`FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Tago) was used.
`
`TABLE 1 Proliferative responses and surface phenotype of peripheral blood, synovial fluid mononuclear cells, and the JBT1 anti-AP-MT cell line
`
`Cells derived from
`
`Peripheral blood
`Synovial fluid
`JBT1 Line
`
`Proliferative response
`(stimulation index ± s.d.)
`
`AP-MT
`
`3.2 ± 0.1
`22.3 ± 0.5
`19.0 ± 0.2
`
`PHA
`
`63.7 ± 0.6
`25.3 ± 0.6
`39.5±0.4
`
`Surface phenotype of T cells (% positive cells)
`
`CD4+
`
`CD8+
`
`CD4-CD8-
`
`TCR a/0
`
`TCR y/8
`
`67
`49
`73
`
`17
`40
`0
`
`6
`11
`23
`
`69
`62
`70
`
`4
`11
`ND
`
`Mononuclear cells were separated from fresh heparinized synovial fluid and peripheral blood on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients, The JBT1 anti-AP-MT T cell line
`was established by incubating synovial fluid mononuclear cells (106 m1-1) with AP-MT (prepared as previously describee; 10 fLg m1-1) in RPM! 1640 medium
`supplemented with 10% pooled normal human serum in 24-well plates (Costar). After 5 days, the blasts were resuspended for 7 days in medium containing
`10U ml-1 recombinant human IL-2 (Cetus), and then restimulated for 3 days with AP-MT in the presence of irradiated (3,000 R) autologous peripheral blood
`mononuclear cells in IL-2-free medium. After eight cycles of restimulation followed by expansion in IL-2, proliferation and phenotype were analysed.
`Proliferative responses of peripheral blood and synovial fluid mononuclear cells were measured as describee, incubating with AP-MT (10 lig m1-1) for 5
`days or phytohaemagglutinin (Wellcome Diagnostics 1µg m1-1) for 3 days. Proliferative responses of the JBT1 line were measured by incubating 15 x103
`cells and 75 x 103 irradiated autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells per well with or without AP-MT (1014 m1-1) or phytohaemagglutlnin
`!0.25 FA, m1-1) for 3 days. [3H]thymidine (1 µCI per well) was added to all cultures 18 h before cell collection. Results are expressed as stimulation index
`(ratio of mean c.p.m. with antigen or mitogen/mean c.p.m. without antigen or mitogen). Control values for cultures without antigen or mitogen were 465 ± 31
`at 3 days and 514 ± 177 at 5 days for peripheral blood; 911 ± 168 at 3 days and 346 ± 73 at 5 days for synovial fluid mononuclear cells; and 510 ± 64
`for cell line JBT1. To determine the phenotype of the cells, synovial fluid mononuclear cells and simultaneously drawn peripheral blood mononuclear cells
`were enriched for T cells using the E-rosette technique. Viable JBT1 cells were purified over Ficoll gradients. For two-colour analysis, the following directly
`conjugated antibodies were used: anti-CD4 (Leu 3-FITC), anti-CD8 (Leu 2-FITC), anti-CD3 (Leu 4-PE) (all from Becton-Dickinson) and directly conjugated
`isotype-matched control antibodies (provided by Dr L. Herzenberg). Cells were stained with each of these antibodies alone and with combinations of
`anti-CD3 +anti-CD4, anti-CD3 + anti-CD8 and anti-CD3 +anti-CD4 +anti-CD8. For indirect immunofluorescent stainings, cells were stained with the following
`antibodies: anti-a//3 TCR (W131, Becton-Dickinson), anti-TCR y-chain (Ti-' A, a generous gift of Dr T. Hercend14), or an isotype-matched control antibody,
`followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Tago). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using a B-D single Argon ion laser (488 mm) FACS III
`equipped with filters for fluorescein and phycoerythrin, interfaced to a Digital Equipment Corporation microVAX computer, using the FAGS DESK software.
`ND, not determined.
`
`NATURE • VOL 339 • 18 MAY 1989 (cid:9)
`
`227
`
`Ex. 1041 - Page 4
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`clones did not proliferate in response to myelin basic protein
`(Table 2) and various other control antigens (not shown).
`Although AP-MT is a relatively crude antigen, it is not mitogenic
`as indicated by its failure to stimulate both BF1 ( y/ (5) and 8.1
`(a / 13) control T cells clones derived from the peripheral blood
`of a normal individual (Table 2). BF1 and 8.1 are representative
`of y/ 8 and a/p alloreactive clones, respectively, which recogn-
`ize class I MHC antigens16. We are currently analysing the fine
`antigenic specificity of the double-negative clones. One clone
`(1.6), proliferated in response to P64, a biochemically purified
`heat-shock protein of relative molecular mass 64,000 from
`mycobacterium bovis BCG (Table 2).
`
`The CD4± clone and the four double-negative clones differ
`in their MHC restriction pattern. As shown in Fig. 3, the CD44
`clone 1.1 proliferated only in the presence of autologous antigen.,
`presenting cells and its proliferation could be blocked by anti.
`DR antibodies (60% suppression). In contrast, the double nega.
`tive clones, represented in Fig. 3 by clone 1.3, proliferated in
`the presence of antigen-presenting cells obtained from different
`unrelated individuals. This proliferation could not be blocked
`by anti-class I or class II HLA antibodies. HLA class I-negative
`Daudi cells could present AP-MT to the double negative clones,
`whereas K562 cells, which do not express both class I and class
`II MHC antigens, could not. No proliferative response to AP-
`
`a (cid:9)
`
`WT31
`
`TI - T A
`
`8 TCS1
`
`TCREI1
`
`.-.•.. too
`
`.ro...
`
`1 .1
`
`t. .
`
`1.2 (cid:9)
`
`1.3
`
`II
`
`—98
`
`- 68
`
`-43
`
`- 28
`
`-18
`
`1
`
`anti-CD3—anti-d
`
`anti-CD3—anti-d
`
`0
`..4
`
`anti-CD3—anti-CD3
`
`9
`
`1.2
`
`1.3
`
`1.4
`
`1 . 6
`
`...
`
`:Iwo (cid:9)
`
`Ho
`
`\
`\...
`
`ift\
`
`'..\-...1
`
`I
`
`V'"\.
`, ,
`
`r
`
`t (cid:9) t.
`
`:rut. toot
`
`1
`
`.
`
`1
`i
`
`
`
`ts
`
`Relative number of cells
`
`....t, i
`
`4.1.1, Mt
`
`.•••,t. mi.
`
`Fluorescence intensity
`
`FIG. 2 Surface expression of TCR chains by the clones. a, The CD4+ clone
`1.1 and the four double-negative clones 1.2-1.6 were analysed by indirect
`immunofluorescence using the following antibodies: WT31 (Becton-Dick-
`inson), specific for a/p framework determinant; Ti- y A, specific for TCR
`y-chain14, S-TCS1 (T Cell Sciences), specific for TCR S-chain, and TCR 81
`(prepared by Dr M. Brenner22 and provided by Dr L. Lanier), specific for TCR
`8-chain. Fluorescence of test antibodies (solid line), superimposed on
`fluorescence intensity obtained with a control antibody (broken line) is shown.
`b, Immunoprecipitation analysis. Cells from double-negative clones 1.2, 1.3
`and 1.6 were surface-iodinated and lysed in digitonin lysis buffer as pre-
`viously described23. After preclearing, immunoprecipitations were carried
`out using an anti-human CD3 8 serum24 (provided by A. Weiss). The
`
`228
`
`precipitates were washed and TCR-CD3 complexes eluted by incubating for
`10 min at 80 °C in 200 pi of a 1% SDS solution. After centrifuging the PAA
`beads, the supernatant was removed and divided in four equal aliquots. One
`of these was directly analysed on SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (lane
`1). NP40 (200 p.1, 1.5%) was added to the other aliquots and these were
`subsequently used for reprecipitation with anti-CD3-8 serum (lane 2), anti-
`CD3- y serum (lane 3) or with anti-TCR-S serum (lane 4) before analysis on
`SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. Molecular weight markers are indicated
`on the right. The anti-human CD3-8 and TCR y-chain sera were made against
`peptides corresponding to the C-terminal 14 and 7 residues of these chains
`respectively2325.
`
`NATURE VOL 339 • 18 MAY 1989
`
`Ex. 1041 - Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`TABLE 2 CD4+ and double negative clones proliferate in response to AP-MT
`
`cell clone
`
`1.1
`1.2
`1.3
`1.4
`1.6
`BF1
`8.1
`
`Phenotype
`
`CD4+, a/13
`DN, y/8
`DN, y/B
`DN, y/8
`DN, y/6
`DN, y/8
`CD8+, a//3
`
`AP-MT
`
`12.3+0.1
`9.4+0.1
`12.0+0.2
`4.1 + 0.1
`7.4+0.1
`1.5+0.1
`1.3 + 0.2
`
`Proliferative response (stimulation index + s.d.)
`MBP
`P64
`
`ND
`2.6 + 0.1
`1.210.1
`1.0+0.0
`0.9 + 0.2
`ND
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`5.4 + 0.1
`ND
`ND
`
`PHA
`
`15.8 + 0.1
`39.4 +1.1
`33.6+ 0.4
`7.5+0.1
`11.6+ 0.2
`16.9+0.3
`37.7 ±0.5
`
`proliferation assays were carried out as described in the legend to Fig. 1 using 15 x103 T cells and 75 x103 irradiated (3,000 R) autologous peripheral
`d mononuclear cells per well in the presence or absence of AP-MT (10 .cg m1-1) guinea pig myelin basic protein (MBP, 2014 m1-1, provided by Dr L.
`ieinman), a biochemically purified 64 K heat shock protein of mycobacterium bovis BCG (P64, 11.4 m1-1, prepared as described26) or phytohaemagglutinln
`ffiA; 0.25 pg m1-1). Cultures were pulsed with [3H] thymidine at 54 h and harvested at 72 h. A representative experiment, one of at least five repetitions
`g shown for each clone. Mean c.p.m.± s.d. obtained without antigen were 1,238 ± 242, 364+142, 399+57, 1,513+437 and 624+115 for clones 1.1,
`a 1.3, 1.4, and 1.6 respectively. Control clones of the double-negative, y/8 (BF1) or CD8+ a/p (8.1) phenotype were derived from the peripheral blood
`a normal individual as described16 and were provided by Drs A. Rivas and E. Engleman. Their mean c.p.m. + s.d. without antigen were 138+ 7 and
`oit 120 respectively. ND, not determined.
`
`ANTIGEN.
`PRESENTING
`CELLS
`
`ANTIBODY
`ADDED
`
`AUTOLOGOUS
`
`ANTI HLA ABC
`DP
`Do
`DR
`
`ALLOGENEIC 1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`
`DAUDI
`K562
`XENOGENEIC
`NONE
`
`1.3
`
`illy
`
`• (cid:9)
`
`MEI
`
`ND
`
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`ND
`
`0 100 200 0 100
`RELATIVE PROLIFERATION MI
`
`FIG. 3 Proliferation of double-negative clones to AP-MT is MHC non-
`restricted. The double-negative clones, represented here by clone 1.3 (left
`side) proliferated in the presence of both autologous and allogeneic antigen-
`presenting cells obtained from randomly selected nonrelated individuals.
`HLA typing was disaparate among the allogeneic and autologous cells (not
`shown). Proliferation of the double-negative clones to AP-MT could not be
`blocked by anti-class I or class II antibodies.
`METHODS. Proliferation assays were as described in the legend to Table 2.
`Autologous or allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells, or xenogeneic
`(Lewis rat spleen) cells, or Daudi and K562 cells were used as a source of
`irradiated antigen-presenting cells. Experiments were done in the presence
`and absence of these antigen-presenting cells, and in the presence or
`absence of AP-MT (10 lig m1-1). Anti-HLA monoclonal antibodies were added
`as described26. These included anti-HLA ABC (W6/32, Accurate), anti-HLA
`DP (37/21, B.D.), anti-HLA DQ (Leu 10, B.D.), or anti-HLA DR (L 243, B.D.).
`Results are presented as relative proliferative response (stimulation index
`obtained with AP-MT in the specified test conditions divided by the stimula-
`tion index obtained with AP-MT in the presence of autologous antigen-
`presenting cells, x100).
`
`MT could be found in the absence of antigen-presenting cells,
`or when xenogeneic cells were used (Fig. 3). Taken together,
`these results indicate that recognition of AP-MT by the double-
`negative clones was not restricted by MHC and did not require
`Interaction with class I MHC antigens. Recognition may,
`however, require presentation by a nonpolymorphic determinant
`of class II MHC gene product, or by different cell-surface
`antigens not expressed on K562 cells. This issue may be
`addressed by the use of cell lines transfected with class II MHC
`encoding genes.
`cells bearing the double negative phenotype have been
`replicated in a variety of murine autoimmune conditions3-16.
`For example, L3T4-, Lyt-2- T cells were shown to be capable
`
`of helping B cells to produce IgG antibodies to DNA in three
`systemic lupus erythematosus mouse strains's. Moreover, double-
`negative splenic T cells from normal mice were found to be
`capable of breaking oral tolerance" and to serve as precursors
`of autoreactive T cells6. Non-malignant, human, double nega-
`tive, TCR y/8-bearing cells have been isolated from the
`peripheral blood of a normal adult", a fetus' and an
`immunodeficient patient', but as yet there is no evidence to
`implicate them in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases.
`Our data show that double-negative y/6 cells can proliferate
`in response to a specific soluble antigen. The clones we describe
`were isolated from an autoimmune inflammatory site, and as
`such may be pathogenically relevant. (cid:9)
`0
`
`.eived 21 February: accepted 21 March 1989
`
`Brenner. M. B. of at Nature 322, 145-149 (1986).
`Lanier. L. & Weiss, A. Nature 324, 268-270 (1986).
`3 Morse, H. C. et al. J. lmmun. 129, 2612-2615 (1982).
`4 Hashimoto, Y., Maxam, A. M. & Greene, M. I. Proc. Nato Acad Sci. U.S.A. 83, 7865-7869 (1986).
`5 Delta, S. K., Patel, H. & Berry, D. J. exp. Med. 165, 1252-1268 (1987).
`6 Morisett, J. et al. Eur. 1. Immure 18, 387-394 (1988).
`7 Malls, L. A., Cron, R. & Bluestone, J. A. Nature 330, 262-264 (1987).
`8 Abrahamsen, T. G.. Froland, S. S. & Natvig, J. B. Scared 1. lmmun. 7, 81-90 (1978).
`8 lotz, M. et al. J. clin. Invest. 78, 713-721 (1986).
`r. Holoshitz, J. et al. Lancet II, 305-309 (1986).
`:1 Ottenhoff, T. H. M. et at Lancet II, 310-313 (1986).
`:1 Stansy, P. New Engi. 1. Med. 298, 869-871 (1978).
`:3 Sails, H. et al. J. lmmun. 135, 1922-1928 11985).
`litsukawa, S., Faure, F.. Lipinski, M., Triebel, F. & Hercend, T. J. exp. Med 166, 1192-1197 (1987).
`Hung, P. Nature 330, 501-502 (1987).
`2 Rivas. A., Koide, J., Cleary, M. L. & Engleman. E. G. J. Immun. 142, 1840-1846 (1989).
`
`17. Kitamura, K. et al. J. lmmun. 139, 3251-3259 (1987).
`18. Ferrini. S. et at J exp. Med 166, 277-282 (1987).
`19. Moingeon, P. et at Nature 323, 638-640 119861.
`20. DeBruyn, J. et at. Infect. lmmun. 55, 245-252 (1987).
`21. Ottenhoff, T. H. M. et al. Nature 329, 66-68 (1986).
`22. Band, H. et at Science 238, 682-684 (1987).
`23. Koning. F. et al. J. exp. Med 166, 595-600 (1987).
`24. Loh. E. Y. et at Nature 330, 569-572 (1987).
`25. Lew. A. M. et al. J. lmmun. 138, 807-814 (1987).
`26. Ottenhoff, T. H. M., Elf erink, D. G., Termljtelan, A., Koning, F. & de Vries, R R. P. Human lmmun.
`13, 117-123 (1.985).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We thank Drs T. Hercend, L. Lanier. L Herzenberg, and A. Weiss for antibodies
`and Drs A. Rivas and E. Engleman for BF1 and 8.1 cells. We also thank S. Jones and B. Holm for
`technical assistance and K. Oto for secretarial help. This work was supported by research grants
`from the National Institutes of Health and the Northern California Chapter of the Arthritis Foundation.
`Dr I Holoshitz was supported by Rothschild F

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket