throbber
Sandoz v. AbbVie
`Sandoz Ex. 1003
`
`Ex. 1003 - Page 1
`
`Ex. 1003 - Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`NOTES
`
`Ex. 1003 - Page 2
`
`Ex. 1003 - Page 2
`
`

`

`1kB KINASE 2 (IKK2) IS A KEY REGULATOR OF SYNOVIAL INFLAMMATION. P P Tak. D M Gerlag.
`IA A van de Geest. K 11 Aupperie, H I. Bennett. A M Manning. 0 S Firestein La Jolla. CA
`
`'Introduction. NI'-k6 Is a key regulator of inflammatory gene transcription and plays an
`important role in the pathogenesis of riteuniatoid arthritis_ NFkli activation in synoviocytes is
`controlled by IKK2, which initiates IkH degradation. Subsequently. NE-RR is released from
`cytoplasmic 1kB and is translocated to the nucleus. In contrast, the other key member of the IKK
`complex. IKKI, is not involved in synoviocyte NE-kB acne-anon. In these studies. we examined the
`effects of IKK2 activation and suppression on adjuvant arthritis (AA).
`Methods and Results. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (f1.5) were initally infected with an
`adenoviral vector expressing a dominant negative IKK2 gene (DN-IKK2) containing a K>M
`mutation. Transgene expression was driven by the CMV promoter. Immunofluorescence demon-
`strated production of the transgene in FISH Its DN function was confirmed since DN-IKK2
`prevented nuclear transliwation of NF4c6 in transduced HS stimulated for 1 hr with TNF-a (100
`ng/m1). AA was induced in Lewis rats with AL tuberculosis in mineral oil. DN-IKK2 (0=15) or
`control adenoviral construct expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) (n=15) was injected
`intraarticularly in the right ankle on day 12. Paw swelling was measured by plethysmometry. After
`I week the mean increase in the volume of the right paw was 1.0610.12 ml in the 1)NIKK2 treated
`rats compared with I.39±0.072 nil in the control rats (P=0.02). Improvement was also noted in
`the uninjected paws of DN-IKK2-treated animals, suggesting a "contralateral effect'. An adenoviral
`construct encoding the wild type (wt) IKK2 gene. which is constitutively activated when
`overexpressed In cells, was then injected into normal rat joints. wt-IKK2 gene transfer resulted in
`ankle erythema and significant paw swelling compared with the contralareral joint and GFP-treated
`rats (P<0.03). Histologic evaluation revealed synovial mononuclear infiltration and intimal lining
`hyperplasia In animals injected with wild type IKK2 but not in the GFP-treated rats.
`Conclusion. Blocking NEkli by gene therapy with a dominant negative IKK2 mutant ameliorates
`rat AA, whereas activation of NP-kB by wild type IKK2 in vivo induces arthritis in normal rats. These
`data suggest that IKK2 plays a central role In the pathogenesis of arthritis.
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`Signal Pharmaceuticals
`
`1974
`
`1MMUNOMODUIATION OF EXPERIMENTAL CHIAMYDIA-ASSOCIATED REACTIVE ARTHRIIIS.
`Judith A Whitium-Hudson, Nerve Gerard, Erin Davis, Gary Vora, W Mark Saltzman, Elizabeth S
`Stuart, H Ralph Schumacher. Alan P 'Hudson Detroit, Ml. Amherst, MA, Ithaca, NY. Philadelphia, PA
`
`We previously remitted development of a murine model of Chlamythasissociated reactive
`arthritis. Following experimental ocular or genital infection with human biovars of Chlantydia
`trachootatis, the organism disseminates to synovial tissue and histopathologic signs of synovitis
`develop. We tested whether immunization with an antichlamydial vaccine candidate prior to
`infectious challenge modulated joint inflammation. C3H/HeJ mice (5-8/treatment group) were
`immunized with a monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody 6nAb2) which is a molecular mimic of the
`chlarnydial exoglycolipid antigen (GLXA). We demonstrated previously in mice that this vaccine
`protects against ocular chlarnydial infection. In the present studies, we compared the oral,
`intranasal. and subcutaneous routes for delivery of mAb2 encapsulated in poly (lactic acid)
`microspheres. After two immunizations (4 reg mAb2/dose) and confirmation that positive controls
`were serum positive fur anti-GOLA Ah by ELISA, all mice and recipients of normal IgGI or nothing
`were topically challenged intravaginally with K serovar of C trachoma's (200(1 TC1050). Vaginal
`swabs were taken weekly for microbiologic assays. Eight-10 wks later, mice were sacrificed and
`tissues processed for histology or molecular analyses for chlarnydial genes. Infectious loads were
`at d.14, all Immunized mice showed
`significantly reduced by oral immunization even at 0_7 (cid:9)
`significant reductions which correlated with reduced genital tract inflammation at 8-10 wks. Knee
`pathology was assessed in a masked fashion. The mAh2 vaccine recipients all showed highly
`significant reduction (p<.001) in synovial histopothologic scores; the major difference from
`controls was a marked reduction in synovial money toinfiltration. Oral immunization was the most
`protective by all criteria tested. Screening PCR on harvested tissues did not distingush altered levels
`of organism in genital tract or synovium based on vaccination and competitive PCR will be used for
`this. Our results show that the mAb2 vaccine reduces acute chlamydial infection as well as the
`synovial inflammation associated with disseminated infection. Current studies arc testing whether
`the vaccine reduces dissemination directly and/or by reduction of damaging synovial inflammatory
`responses.
`
`1976
`
`SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALENDRONATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN
`PEDIATRIC RHEUMATIC DISEASES. R CIM2Z, F Falcini, M Bardare, F (cid:9)
`L Lenore. A
`Buoncompagni, M L Bianchi Trieste, Genova Italy, Milano. Italy
`
`Treatment of secondary osteoporosis with bisphosphonates is well established in Adults. hut
`clinical studies in the pediatric age are limited
`An open multicenter prospective study was performed to assess safety and eflicay .if alendmnate
`in children with rheumatic diseases. To he included, patients had to he on chronic (cid:9)
`6 months)
`corticostemid treatment or to have a low hone mineral density Forty-three patients (t0 Irmalo,
`males) completed the study.. Diagnoses were juvenile arthritis (1-). SLE 112c demotomyostirs
`3 7 years: 11 patients had already reached
`other (7). Mean age at study entrance was 12.9 (cid:9)
`pubertal maturity. Alendronate was administered orally at the daily (image o(5 or 10 nig IlAwhns-
`Z-scorcs ranged from -1.3 to -5.3. Each patient underwent serial clinical and lahornori Mainatlern
`Standard biochemical test were performed at each participating center. while bone-sped&
`parameters were measured centrally. lumbar spine bone mineral density (1)511)) was measured
`every 6 months with DXA using a standardized protocol. crosscalibratkm of insinuncets. and
`quality control procedures.
`Results showed 3 substantial increase of bone mass in all children. with an average HMI) Int.-RAW
`of 14.2 ± 10% after 1 year. One third of patients obtained a normal HMI) value. In comparison ihr
`average HMI) in 16 of the patients of the study followed during the year immediately preceding the
`onset of alendronaie therapy had increased by only 1% !fright mere-aux' by an an crape of 4 A .4 3
`cm during the study period. Scrum alkaline plitophataw decreased by lb 3 I I 2%. and urinary
`r.8%. Knee radiographs performed in prepubenal children
`procollagen telopeptyde by 26.8 (cid:9)
`showed absence of rickets and presence of metaphyscal lines The drug was well tolerated. except
`for occasional abdominal pain and one episode of esophagitis
`We conclude that alenelronate can be safely administered even in the pediamc age. and ilut ti
`significantly improves bone MASS in children or adolescents with rheumatic diseases and wrondin
`osteoporosis.
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`
`ACR Abstract Concurrent Session
`RA: TNF-Blockade
`Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 10:30 Am-12:00 em
`
`1977 (cid:9)
`
`EFFICACY OF ME FULLY IILIMAN ANTI-TNE ANTIBODY 1121.- IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS L
`BA van de Pune, R Rau, F C lireedveld, J R Kalden, MG :Malaise vt schattenkirchner. P F.mery G I
`Burmener, H 7.ddler, H H MOMSOpOtliO3, D (:ompagnone, J Kempen'. El Kupper The Netherlands,
`Germany, Belgium. United Kingdom, Greece
`
`Objective: Dose-finding phase 11 study comparing 3 dose levels of 1)2E7 and placebo over
`3 months in patients with long standing active rheumatoid arthritis.
`Methods: A total of 283 patients were included In this randomised double-blind. placeba-
`controlled study. DMARDs were discontinued at least 4 weeks before study treatment Patients
`were randomised equally into lour arms to receive weekly doses of either D2E7 at 20. 10.80 nig
`or placebo by subcutaneous (s.c.) self injection for 5 months.
`Results: overall patient characteristics at baseline (median): age 53 years. duration of RA Syrtis.
`SWIC 18. TIC 30, ESR 45 nun/h. CRP 51 mg/I, 4 previous DMARDs. Clinical responses after 3
`months arc summarised below based on EIT analysis
`
`% of pis achieving ACR 20 response
`Median 94) improvement in TJC
`Median % improve lent in SWJC
`Median N improvement in (:101,
`
`Placebo
`
`D2E7 (cid:9)
`
`(n=70)
`10
`
`16
`
`20 mg (cid:9)
`(n=7I) (cid:9)
`49 (cid:9)
`57 (cid:9)
`42 (cid:9)
`55 (cid:9)
`
`1)2E7
`
`40 mg (cid:9)
`(n=70) (cid:9)
`57 (cid:9)
`61 (cid:9)
`59 (cid:9)
`6- (cid:9)
`
`D2E7
`
`80 rag
`(n=72)
`56
`55
`61
`65
`
`Conclusion: For all efficacy parameters studied, all doses of D28 were Statistically Significaraly
`superior to placebo (p < 0.001). 20. 40 and 8.0 mg/week were nearly equally efficacious when
`given s.c. in patients with active RA.
`
`Dtsclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`Grants supporting this work: Arthritis Foundation (1W-H). The Hirsh Foundation (EIiS), NIH
`AI44493 (JW-F1), AR4254 I (AM). and 05141873 (W515).
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`Study sponsored by Knoll AG, Ludwigshafen. Germany
`
`1975
`
`1978
`
`GLICOSAMINE SULFATE SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES PROGRESSION OF KNEE GCNEOARLEIRMS OVER 3 YEARS, A
`LARGE RANI/MP:ED, PIACE110-CONTROLLED, DOUBLEBLIND, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL J-Y Reginster, R Deroisy,
`Paul, R 1. lay, Y. lienunin. G Giactwclli. J Dacre, L C Ratt. C Grasso
`
`Background Results of clinical trials suppon a rule for phnosamine sulfate. a s!inplisrn Modifying Deng in imourthritis
`(047. "nue testy sely designed to test the lorneterrn Hints Male slag efi the prop:J.04On of knee CLAjoint structural
`and symptoms Methods 212 patients with limn L/A (211:11 mite.) were randomly assigned. in a dethic-Mind Fashion. to
`the contintiolei treatment with oral gluommine sulfate 1500 rep otaccasini or plasrbo for 3 years Wright.lwaring
`ants-nip en or radiographs of each knee were. Liken at enrolment and after I and 3 years standardising patient positioning
`anal radinimphir procedure. Total mean joint spare wick', (I(Wl of the medial cnmpartnwnt of the tibk dens:oral joint was
`image analyst hy a validated :anum-Med algorithin. win the nommen medial Mint space at ornament
`lining taken for the primary outwit:on (Small:Sim :wring.). were scored in sack .1.momit Usk hr the 00141 WONLM:
`index, VA3.0 version. lama were analysed seiranitel) :nosed:lig to a per-Firinneiti IPIn approach on ,Ayear oimploces. in on
`an intentiortutu-at (fret) basis including all randomised patients by the lastobramationnanioklimsanl. Results. Tlw two
`palms.: of 106 patients each were [Ornineahie for demographic and disease eloractenstka. Pitcchotreated patients had an
`avenue joint space namming (ESN) of approximately 0.0/14/1 truniyear. while ms JSN occurred In the glass:minims sulfate
`group. A slight worsening in symptoms as ecident At Ihe end of treatment with placebo compared to the unpnreennnt
`olviervist after glitcosainine
`
`PP (cid:9)
`
`PP
`
`Placebo
`(.9-71)
`5.46 (0.15)
`4t 31 (0.13)
`094 (591
`-1-9.11% (12.3)
`
`Glatorsamine sulfate
`(N4:68)
`5.39 (0.16)
`40.07 (0.12)b
`1024 (591
`3% (6.4)d
`
`ITT (cid:9)
`
`Placebo
`(N=1116)
`5.39 (0.12)
`.0.24 (0.10)
`910 (47)
`+5.55 01.61
`
`ter
`
`Glueosamine sulfate
`(N=105).
`5.23 (11.13)c
`40.1210.0'2)
`Wth (46)
`45.4% (5.4)
`
`.1.211 enrolment (mm)
`.tsts 3 years finM)
`WOMAC enrolment
`varittion 3 roan
`
`allel are prennted as mean (SE).
`enrolment radiograph missing.
`(Hr. dp=11.016, `p.--11.04 vs. placebo (ANOVA)
`hp.-01130, (cid:9)
`Conclusions. Combined structure and Symptom Modifying effects suggest that glairosainthe sulfate may he a
`possible Disease Modifying agent In OA.
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`Work reported In this abstract W. supported hr the Roust Research Group
`
`LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH THE FULLY HUMAN ANTI-TNF-ANTIBODY 02E7 SLOWS RADIO.
`GRAPHIC DISEASE PROGRESSION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. R RAU, 0 Herborn. 0 Sander'.
`BA van de Putte, PLC van Riel, A den Brooder, M Schattenkirchner. J Wastlhuber. M Rill. R Rnner.
`J Kempen), H Kopper Germany, The Netherlands, Switzerland
`Objective: Long-term study of the effect of D2E7 on radiographic disease progressi1n) m parents
`with long standing active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
`Methods: Patients were treated with iv 02E7 doses from 0.5 to 10 mg/kg for one vear month' at
`biweekly Intervals (study DE001/003). 66 patients with a complete set of X-rays of hands wrist. and
`feet taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months were evaluated . Additional X-rays preceding study cony
`(pre-value. mean minus t9 months) were available for 22 patients from the Ratingen cellar
`compare
`progression raant,ei svprequeanncdedoufritnhge fitrelmastment with 02r. X-rays were read setwee
`
`blinded ; he patientpr
`irresnkt
`Results: Mean radiographic score values over time are summarised for the total study P)Pula'iun
`01 = 66) as well as for the subgroup with preceding X-rays (n = 22).
`
`Mean RA duration
`Ratingen Score (0-190)
`Sharp erosion score (0-220)
`Sharp JSN wore ((-168)
`
`All centres (cid:9)
`
`(n=66) (cid:9)
`
`Centre (cid:9)
`
`Ratingen (cid:9)
`
`Baseline
`(12.1 yrs)
`47.0
`59.2
`53.9
`
`12 months
`(13-1 yrs)
`46.7
`59.0
`55.0
`
`Pre-value
`(10.2 yrs)
`34.6
`43.9
`45.5
`
`Baseline
`(11.8 yrs)
`41.2
`52.3
`51.7
`
`(n=22)
`
`12 [Waft
`(12.8 311)
`41.4
`52.3
`53.5
`
`During the treatment with 02E7 no evidence for radiographic progression was deserted in
`contrast to the preceding time period with DMARD treatment where a deterioration war 0hvlous
`Conclusion: The data suggest D2E7. a fully human anti-TNF antibody, slows disease P".
`in RA. This result warrants further evaluation.
`
`Disclosure: work reported in this abstract was supported by:
`Manly was supported by Knoll AG, Ludwigshafen. Germany
`
`Ex. 1003 - Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket