throbber
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs
`
`Monthly Focus: Pulmonary-Allergy, Dermatological, Gastrointestinal &
`Arthritis
`
`Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`Gert Van Assche & Paul Rutgeerts
`Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000
`Leuven, Belgium
`
`The current treatment of Crohn’s disease is limited by a lack of long-term
`efficacy of corticosteroid therapy and the associated side effects. Biological
`treatment strategies aimed at neutralising immune responses, offer new
`opportunities for the management of chronic inflammatory disorders. In
`Crohn’s disease, anti-TNF agents have taken the lead in development of
`immune-modulating drugs since TNF is known to be a pivotal cytokine in
`this illness. Different strategies have been explored aimed at inhibiting TNF
`but at present, the majority of clinical data have been obtained with
`monoclonal antihuman TNF antibodies. The chimeric anti-TNF IgG1
`antibody infliximab (cA2, Remicade©, Centocor) has been proven,
`in
`multiple clinical trials, to be an effective and well tolerated therapy for the
`management of acute Crohn’s disease and recently this compound has
`obtained FDA and European Medicines Evaluation Agency
`approval.
`Although there are some concerns about immunogenicity of the anti-TNF
`antibody resulting in the formation of human antichimeric antibodies
`(HACA) as well as lymphoproliferative disorders, the clinical benefit in the
`treatment of refractory Crohn’s disease is a major therapeutic breakthrough.
`Further studies will be needed to establish the role and optimal dosing
`scheme of anti-TNF antibodies in maintenance of remission, monitor safety
`in the long run and to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative anti-TNF
`agents such as the TNF receptor/Fc fusion protein etanercept (Enbrel®,
`Immunex) and TNF synthesis inhibitor thalidomide.
`Keywords: Crohn’s disease, medical therapy, TNF
`
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1):103-111
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Priority status within GI research and drug development has been assigned
`to Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis as they are the two main types of
`inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the incidence is rising both in the US
`and in Europe. IBD usually emerges in young adults and causes severe
`morbidity. Whereas in ulcerative colitis inflammatory lesions are restricted
`to the large bowel, Crohn’s disease can affect the entire GI tract. The
`majority of patients have terminal ileitis, colitis or a combination of both,
`even so isolated colitis, upper GI involvement and perianal disease are an
`integral part of the clinical picture. The current therapy for Crohn’s disease
`is limited by a lack of long-term efficacy and by the severity of side effects.
`Since Crohn’s disease is a chronically relapsing disease, the ideal treatment
`should be aimed at the induction and maintenance of remission without
`stricture formation. This should be reflected histologically in the restoration
`of mucosal inflammation and lack of excessive fibrosis of the deeper layers.
`
`Van Assche & Rutgeerts
`Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`http://www.ashley-pub.com
`
`Review
`Introduction
`
`1.
`
`2. Role of TNF in IBD
`pathogenesis
`
`3. Biological inhibitors of
`TNF
`
`4. Mechanism of action and
`pharmacokinetics of
`anti-TNF agents
`
`5. Use of anti-TNF therapy in
`IBD
`
`5.1 Infliximab
`
`5.2 CDP571
`
`5.3 Etanercept
`
`5.4 Inhibitors of TNF
`synthesis
`
`6.
`
`Safety of anti-TNF agents
`in Crohn’s disease
`
`6.1 Immunogenicity and
`autoantibodies
`
`6.2 Infusion-related reactions
`
`6.3 Infections
`
`6.4 Malignancies
`
`7. Expert opinion
`
`Bibliography
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`103
`2000 © Ashley Publications Ltd. ISSN 1354-3784
`
`

`

`104 Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`Corticosteroids have been the cornerstone for the
`treatment of severe Crohn’s disease over the last
`twenty years but
`this approach faces important
`drawbacks. Firstly, over time, the disease becomes
`refractory to the steroid treatment in most patients and
`secondly, there are adverse side effects when using
`steroids in the long-term. In the last decade, azathio-
`prine and its active metabolite 6-mercaptopurine have
`gained momentum in the maintenance of remission in
`Crohn’s disease. The reports on the use of other
`immune suppressive drugs such as methotrexate,
`cycloporine and FK-506 (tacrolimus) have been
`contradictory and at present, these regimens should
`be considered experimental.
`
`As in other chronic inflammatory conditions such as
`rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
`the emphasis of drug
`development
`for Crohn’s disease has been on
`biological therapies which target a single inflamma-
`tory mediator or pathway. This approach is surprising
`since intestinal
`inflammation in Crohn’s disease
`activates numerous inflammatory pathways which
`have a high degree of redundancy [1]. All experi-
`mental therapies are aimed at changing the balance
`between stimulatory and inhibitory inflammatory
`mediators in the inflamed bowel wall. For example,
`the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-11 have
`been used both in animal models and in Crohn’s
`disease patients [2,3] with limited success. On the
`other hand, treatment strategies aimed at eliminating
`effects of the pivotal cytokine TNF have proven to be
`successful in a large number of patients with refrac-
`tory Crohn’s disease. This efficacy has led to the
`approval by the US FDA and the EMEA of the use of
`infliximab, of a chimeric monoclonal anti-TNF
`antibody, in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. This
`review discusses the molecular characteristics,
`efficacy and safety of various anti-TNF agents that are
`being developed for the treatment of Crohn’s disease.
`
`2. Role of TNF in IBD pathogenesis
`
`Although the aetiology of Crohn’s disease is multifac-
`torial and has not been fully elucidated, it is clear that
`chronic intestinal inflammation results from a disrup-
`tion in the balance between pro-
`and
`anti-inflammatory mediators that are present in the
`normal intestinal mucosa. A variety of these mediators
`are expressed in the inflamed bowel, but in experi-
`mental models of
`intestinal
`inflammation TNF is
`present at an early stage along with IL-1 and IL-6 [4]. In
`patients with Crohn’s disease TNF levels are elevated
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`in the inflamed mucosa and also in the serum, when
`the patient has severe illness [5,6]. Both macrophages
`and activated T-lymphocytes are considered to be the
`cellular sources of TNF in gut mucosa. Although TNF
`production is probably not specific for intestinal
`inflammation causing Crohn’s disease, the predomi-
`nant Th1 phenotype of the CD4+-T cells makes it a
`key mediator of the inflammatory process responsible
`for this disease and a potential target for treatment.
`
`Transcription of the TNF gene positioned on the short
`arm of chromosome 6 leads to the secretion of
`inactive soluble 17 kD TNF-monomers that combine
`into 51 kD trimers, the active TNF ligand [7,8]. The
`transmembrane TNF precursor protein is processed
`by the TNF-α converting enzyme (TACE) that converts
`it into the 17 kD soluble monomere, while the unproc-
`essed 25 kD TNF remains attached to the cell
`membrane, where it is involved in cell-cell contact
`activation. The ligand binds two or three receptors
`simultaneously resulting in receptor polymerisation
`and signal-transduction. [9]. TNF-receptor activation
`triggers a variety of biological effects both locally
`including neutrophil attraction and granuloma
`formation and systemically such as the induction of
`the acute phase reaction. It is important to note that
`TNF-receptors in the cell membrane are cleaved by
`proteolytic enzymes and that this results in circulating
`soluble receptor
`fragments with TNF binding
`capacity, which can act as TNF scavengers.
`
`3. Biological inhibitors of TNF
`
`The anti-TNF agents currently in development for
`treating chronic inflammatory disorders can be mostly
`divided into three classes:
`
`(cid:129) anti-TNF antibodies
`
`(cid:129) TNF receptor/antibody fusion proteins
`
`(cid:129) inhibitors of TNF synthesis
`
`The anti-TNF antibodies bind soluble TNF ligand. This
`action neutralises the cytokine and in addition it may
`lead to lysis of cells with the membrane-bound TNF
`via complement fixation or cell mediated cytotoxicity.
`The major drawback of anti-human antibodies is the
`formation of antibodies against
`the molecule,
`potentially leading to their rapid clearance and to
`infusion reactions upon repeated exposure. At
`present, clinical experience in IBD has largely been
`with the Centocor chimeric human/mouse
`monoclonal antibody (mAb) infliximab. This first
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`Figure 1: Schematic representation of the engineered anti-TNF antibodies infliximab and CDP571 and the TNF receptor/Fc fusion
`protein etanercept. The chimaeric antibody infliximab contains the variable regions of a murine anti-human TNF antibody. CDP571 is
`a humanised antibody in which only the hypervariable, complementarity determining regions are murine. Etanercept is entirely human
`and contains two p75 TNF receptor molecules. Note that an Fc region is present in both infliximab and etanercept which are derived of
`an IgG1, whereas CDP571 is an IgG4.
`
`Van Assche & Rutgeerts 105
`
`IgG1 antibody
`
`variable
`
`constant
`
`Fc portion
`
`Chimeric human/mouse
`antibody
`
`Humanised human/mouse
`antibody
`
`Human receptor/Fc
`fusion protein
`
`murine
`human
`
`75 % human
`
`Fc
`
`95 % human
`
`100 % human
`
`Fc
`
`Infliximab
`
`CDP571
`
`Etanercept
`
`generation engineered protein is produced by a
`murine myeloma cell
`line transfected with cDNA
`encoding the constant domains of the human IgG1
`antibody [10]. Since the protein is still 25% murine
`(Figure 1) it induces the formation of HACA. From
`the second generation of
`‘humanised’ antibodies,
`CDP571 (Celltech) is currently being evaluated for the
`treatment of Crohn’s disease. This protein is 95%
`human, but still gives rise to human antihuman
`antibodies (HAHA) [11]. For the TNF receptor fusion
`protein, etanercept and for inhibitors of TNF synthesis
`such as thalidomide, phase-I clinical
`trials are at
`present being conducted for the treatment of Crohn’s
`disease. Inhibitors of TACE that inhibit the release of
`soluble TNF may enter clinical
`trials for Crohn’s
`disease in the near future.
`
`4. Mechanism of action and
`pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF agents
`
`The chimaeric antibody cA2 (infliximab) binds with
`high affinity to the membrane bound TNF monomers
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`and to the soluble TNF trimers [12,13]. Upon binding
`to TNF on cell membranes, the human IgG1, part of
`the molecule triggers both complement activation and
`cell mediated cytotoxicity. In vivo studies have shown
`that
`infliximab induces a decrease in mucosal
`pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with the
`activation of Th1-cells [14]. Interestingly infliximab
`acts as a cytokine scavenger prolonging the serum
`half-life of TNF probably by protecting it
`from
`proteolytic degradation. [15]. The serum t½ values for
`infliximab vary between 9.5 and 14 days for the 5 - 20
`mg/kg infusion dose [15,16].
`
`The humanised antibody CDP571 (Celltech) consists
`of a human IgG4 (Figure 1) and therefore it does not
`activate complement and does not
`trigger
`cell-mediated cytotoxicity. CDP571 probably
`functions as a scavenger of soluble TNF trimers and
`blocks membrane bound TNF. The serum half-life for
`the 5 mg/kg dose is 14 days, but unlike infliximab,
`CDP571 was detectable for up to 12 weeks after a
`single dose of 2 - 10 mg/kg.
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`106 Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`Figure 2: Schematic representation of mechanisms of action of anti-TNF agents infliximab, CDP571 and etanercept.
`
`lysis of TNF-expressing cells
`infliximab
`
`apoptosis of TNF-expressing cells
`infliximab ?
`
`complement activation
`cell mediated cytotoxicity
`
`T- cells
`macrophages
`
`neutralization of membrane-bound
`TNF trimers
`infliximab, CDP571
`
`neutralization of soluble TNF trimers
`infliximab, CDP571, etanercept
`
`The fusion protein, etanercept consists of the TNF
`binding region of the human 75 kD receptor linked to
`the Fc domain of IgG1. Each molecule carries two TNF
`receptors (Figure 1). The fusion protein has a higher
`affinity for TNF trimers than the native soluble
`receptor fragments and it has an increased serum
`half-life (± 5 days) [17,18].
`
`5. Use of anti-TNF therapy in IBD
`
`5.1 Infliximab
`Infliximab was first used in a 14-year old girl with
`Crohn’s disease refractory to medical treatment, at a
`dose of 10 mg/kg, given twice with a two week
`interval. The patient went into remission lasting for
`three months [19]. Subsequently in the same centre,
`ten patients with Crohn’s disease refractory to steroid
`treatment, were included in a pilot study. Eight
`consecutive patients were treated with 10 mg/kg and
`two additional patients with 20 mg/kg to assess
`product safety (Table 1). Dramatic results with rapid
`onset were seen in nine out of ten patients, who
`reported clinical improvement within one week and
`went into remission (CDAI index < 150) at two weeks.
`The clinical remission lasted for eight weeks and at
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`after four weeks endoscopic and histological evalua-
`tion showed a dramatic improvement in these nine
`patients [20].
`
`A dose finding study was then initiated, enrolling 20
`patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease
`(CDAI 220-400) refractory to steroid treatment. At four
`weeks clinical improvement as defined by a 70 point
`drop in the CDAI score was observed in 40% patients
`in the 1 mg/kg group and in 80% in all higher dosage
`groups (5 - 10 - 20 mg/kg). At week 12, the 5, 10 and
`20 mg/kg group had comparable response rates (67%,
`80% and 50% respectively). However, optimal
`remission rates (CDAI < 150) at week two were
`observed in the 10 mg/kg group. The clinical
`response of the patients in the high dose groups was
`reflected in the endoscopic activity score [21]. For
`Phase IIb/Phase III placebo-controlled trials the
`dosing scheme was based on this study (5 – 10 - 20
`mg/kg).
`
`A placebo-controlled multicentre Phase IIb/III trial
`was subsequently initiated in which 108 patients with
`refractory Crohn’s disease were included [22]. The
`continuation of concomitant conventional
`therapy
`was allowed. Patients received placebo or 5, 10 or 20
`mg/kg infliximab at the start. At four weeks clinical
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`Table 1: Clinical trials investigating the use of anti-TNF antibodies in Crohn’s disease.
`
`Van Assche & Rutgeerts 107
`
`Indication
`
`Patients
`
`Duration
`(weeks)
`
`Clinical remission
`
`Ref.
`
`Clinical improvement (% of
`patients)
`Infliximab, cA2, Centocor
`infliximab
`placebo
`(10 mg/kg)
`100%
`80%
`17%
`50%
`26%
`56%
`35%
`66%
`CDP571, Celltech
`CDP571
`CDP571
`placebo
`(5 mg/kg)
`(5 mg/kg)
`[27]
`0%
`30%
`50%
`55%
`8
`30
`active CD
`Note: For all infliximab clinical trials the results of the 10 mg/kg dosage are represented since this dose was used in all studies.
`Clinical improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 70 points in the CDAI (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index). Remission was
`considered to occur if the CDAI dropped below a score of 150. For the trial in patients with fistulae clinical improvement was defined
`as closure of at least 50% of draining fistulae and remission as closure of all fistulae.
`
`active CD
`active CD
`active CD
`fistulae
`maintenance
`
`10
`20
`108
`94
`73
`
`8
`4
`4
`18
`44
`
`infliximab
`(10 mg/kg)
`100%
`20%
`25%
`38%
`51%
`
`placebo
`
`4%
`13%
`21%
`
`placebo
`
`[20]
`[21]
`[22]
`[26]
`[25]
`
`improvement was observed in 17% (4/24) of patients
`receiving placebo and in 82% (13/27) of the 5 mg/kg
`infliximab group (p = 0.005). The response rates in the
`higher dose groups were lower than those in the 5
`mg/kg group. Clinical remission (CDAI score < 150)
`occurred in 48% of the patients receiving 5 mg/kg
`versus 25% in both the 10 and 20 mg/kg group. In the
`placebo group only 4% of the patients went into
`clinical remission.
`
`Additional information on the effect of infliximab on
`inflammatory lesions in active Crohn’s disease was
`gathered in the European centres involved in this first
`Phase IIb/III study. At week four, a close correlation
`between the clinical response to infliximab on the one
`hand and improvement
`in both endoscopic and
`histological scores was observed [23,24]. The
`reduction in the severity of inflammation coincided
`with the disappearance of TNF and downregulation of
`adhesion molecules in the lamina propria [24].
`
`This study provided firm evidence of the effectiveness
`of anti-TNF antibodies in the acute management of
`refractory Crohn’s disease both for clinical improve-
`ment and for remission. Long-term maintenance of
`remission was evaluated in a follow-up study where
`patients who had shown a response to the initial
`infusion of infliximab or placebo were again random-
`ised to receive 10 mg/kg infliximab or placebo at
`weeks 12, 20, 28 and 36. In addition patients who had
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`entered the open label study with 10 mg/kg after a
`failure of response to the first infusion were offered
`the possibility to be enrolled in the repeated infusion
`study. Seventy-three patients were included and
`patients were followed until week 48 (8 weeks after
`their last infusion). At week 48 a persistent clinical
`response was noted in 66% (24/36 of infliximab versus
`35% (13/37) of placebo treated patients (P < 0.01). The
`difference between remission rates in the placebo and
`infliximab group was also significant [25]. Since the
`optimal dose and dosing interval for maintenance
`therapy can not be distilled from this study and
`because there was a high variance in concomitant
`therapy (amino-salicylates, steroids and azathioprine)
`among the 73 patients, the FDA did not approve of the
`use of infliximab in maintenance therapy for Crohn’s
`disease.
`
`As enterocutaneous fistulae are a debilitating compli-
`cation of Crohn’s disease, a second Phase III study
`was directed towards patients with this complication.
`The study was designed as a multicentre, double-
`blind placebo-controlled trial. Ninety-four patients
`with abdominal wall or perianal fistulae were treated
`with three infusions of either placebo or cA2
`(infliximab) at 5 or 10 mg/kg [26]. Three infusions
`were given at week 0, 2 and 6 and patients were
`followed through week 18. Clinical improvement was
`defined as the closure of at least 50% of draining
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`108 Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`fistulae for four weeks or more and occurred in 26%
`(8/31) of placebo patients versus 67 (21/31) in the 5
`mg/kg and 56% (18/32) in the 10 mg/kg infliximab
`group (p = 0.002). In addition, remission, defined as
`the closure of all draining fistulae for ≥ 4 weeks, was
`observed in a significantly higher proportion of
`infliximab treated patients (Table 1). The onset of
`response was also more rapid in the cA2 group as
`compared to the placebo group (median time to
`response 14 days [cA2] versus 42 days [placebo]).
`
`Taken as a whole these studies, which have enrolled a
`total of 233 patients, have shown that infliximab is
`highly effective in the induction of remission in
`moderate to severe Crohn’s disease, more particularly
`since most patients were refractory to conventional
`therapy including steroids and immunosuppressives.
`Moreover, the data suggest that there may be a role for
`the antibody given as repeated infusions in the
`maintenance of clinical remission.
`
`5.2 CDP571
`One single dose, multicentre, placebo-controlled,
`double-blind trial
`investigating the efficacy of the
`humanised antibody CDP571 in Crohn’s disease has
`been reported. [27]. The trial enrolled 30 patients with
`moderate to severe refractory Crohn’s disease who
`were treated with a single infusion of either placebo
`or CDP571 at 5 mg/kg. The primary end point in this
`study was defined as a decrease in the median CDAI at
`week two. In the CDP571 treated patients, the median
`CDAI dropped 96 points in two weeks (263 to 267, p <
`0.001) whereas there was no significant change in the
`placebo group. The study suggests that there may be a
`role for CDP571 in the short-term management of
`refractory Crohn’s disease, although the results of
`now completed studies will be needed to evaluate the
`optimal dosing scheme and the long-term effects.
`
`5.3 Etanercept
`At present no clinical studies focusing on the use of
`the TNF fusion protein, etanercept in Crohn’s’ disease
`have been completed.
`
`5.4 Inhibitors of TNF synthesis
`The use of small molecule TNF-inhibitors such as
`PDE4 inhibitors and thalidomide for treating Crohn’s
`disease is still in an early phase of development. The
`PDE4 inhibitor oxpentifylline has been used in 16
`patients with steroid dependent Crohn’s disease in a
`non-blinded study with a single dose of 400 mg q.i.d.
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`[28]. After 4 weeks, there was no evidence of clinical
`or endoscopic improvement in these 16 patients. For
`thalidomide, preliminary results suggest
`that
`this
`molecule may have a role in the acute treatment of
`Crohn’s disease although the drug carries the threat of
`adverse side effects such as birth defects and
`neuropathy [29]. Thalidomide is used in other chronic
`inflammatory diseases associated with oral aftous
`lesions and may prove useful in the management of
`patients with oro-pharyngeal Crohn’s disease.
`
`6. Safety of anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s
`disease
`
`Anti-TNF agents and more specifically infliximab has
`been used in over 20,000 patients, many in controlled
`trials and is generally well tolerated. However, as
`TNF-α is a pleiotropic cytokine with a variety of
`biological effects, inhibition of the molecule raises
`important safety considerations including immuno-
`genicity, infusion-related reactions, infections and risk
`of malignancy. It is important to note that the side
`effects of infliximab are noted from data obtained in
`Crohn’s disease as well as in RA.
`
`6.1 Immunogenicity and auto-antibodies
`Of all Crohn’s disease patients enrolled in clinical
`trials with infliximab 13% developed HACA. The
`presence of HACA may predispose patients to
`infusion-related reactions and to rapid clearance of
`infliximab.
`Immune modifying therapy such as
`steroids, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine appears to
`protect against the formation of HACA (10% in this
`group versus 23% in patients without concomitant
`immune modulating therapy) [16]. Repeated exposure
`to infliximab after a prolonged interval may lead to a
`serum-sickness type delayed hypersensitivity
`reactions as was recently reported in a retreatment
`trial [30]. Classical serum sickness symptoms including
`myalgia, fever, rash, urticaria, polyarthralgia and facial
`oedema were found in 10 out of 40 patients of whom
`6 were admitted to hospital. All the patients tested had
`high titres of HACA and rapidly cleared circulating
`infliximab. These reactions urged the manufacturer to
`request shorter intervals for repeated infliximab
`infusions. HAHA were found in 35% and 16% of
`patients treated with CDP571 and etanercept respec-
`tively although the clinical
`implication of HAHA
`formation has not been established.
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`Three patients (one with Crohn’s disease and two
`with RA) developed a lupus-like syndrome after
`treatment with infliximab, although anti-double
`stranded (ds)-DNA-antibodies were found in 8.6% of
`all patients. The auto-antibodies disappeared from the
`serum after discontinuation of infliximab treatment.
`No data on auto-antibody formation after treatment
`with CDP571 are available, but etanercept treatment
`may result in the formation of antinuclear antibodies
`and anti-ds-DNA antibodies. Anti-ds-DNA 15%
`(etanercept) versus 4% (placebo).
`
`6.2 Infusion-related reactions
`Reactions related to infliximab infusion were defined
`as any adverse event occurring during or within 2 h
`post-infusion. Among infliximab-treated patients, 16%
`experienced an adverse event as compared to 6% of
`controls. Of 1207 infliximab infusions, 5% were
`associated with aspecific symptoms such as fever or
`chills, 1% with cardiopulmonary reactions (chest pain,
`dyspnea and hypotension) and 1% with urticaria
`and/or pruritus. Patients who developed HACA were
`more at risk for infusion reactions whereas concomi-
`tant immune-modulator treatment protected against
`reactions to infliximab infusion [16].
`
`Local reactions at the injection site were observed in
`up to 37% of patients treated subcutaneously with
`etanercept although discontinuation of the therapy
`was never necessary.
`
`6.3 Infections
`Although the total number of infections reported after
`treatment with infliximab was higher than in controls
`(21% vs. 11%) this did not result in an increase of the
`incidence of serious infections requiring antibiotic
`treatment. In the calculation, an adjustment was made
`for the length of follow-up (average of 22 weeks for
`infliximab and 12 weeks for placebo).
`
`Serious infections in the infliximab treated patients
`included pneumonia, cholecystitis, cellulitis and
`catheter-related sepsis. In addition, after treatment
`with CDP571 and etanercept there is no increased risk
`of serious infections. In patients with enterocutaneous
`fistulae treated with infliximab, newly formed
`abscesses were observed in 12% [26]. This is probably
`not so much due to impaired host defence, but rather
`reflects the natural evolution of relapse in anal
`Crohn’s disease and by rapid closing of the cutaneous
`orifice with entrapment of faecal material.
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`Van Assche & Rutgeerts 109
`
`It is of interest to note that no opportunistic infections
`were reported in patients treated with infliximab,
`which is in accordance with the absence of
`leucopenia and of impairment of T-cell proliferation
`after infliximab treatment.
`
`6.4 Malignancies
`Due to the pleiotropic nature of the TNF bioactivity,
`which includes tumour suppression,
`there is a
`theoretical risk of increased malignancy with anti-TNF
`agents. An elevated incidence of
`leukaemia and
`lymphoma has been observed in patients receiving
`drugs for long-term immunosuppressive agents,
`including Crohn’s disease patients. Of 394 patients
`treated with infliximab one patient with Crohn’s
`disease developed a non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This
`patient had been diagnosed with Crohn’s disease 30
`years before anti-TNF treatment and had been on
`long-term immune modulator therapy. Four more
`lymphomas were found in infliximab treated RA
`patients. In the largest patient cohort reported in the
`literature by Greenstein, 4 in 1,480 Crohn’s disease,
`patients developed a lymphoma in a 20 year time
`interval (1960 - 1982) [30]. Therefore, for Crohn’s
`disease one case of lymphoma does not allow to
`conclude that there is an increased incidence after
`treatment with infliximab although it warrants a
`heightened alertness towards lymphoproliferative
`disorders in these patients.
`
`7. Expert opinion
`
`Anti-TNF agents are the first representatives of new
`biological
`therapies for the treatment of Crohn’s
`disease, opening both new opportunities for patients
`with a debilitating disease and a challenge for drug
`development. The bulk of experience in clinical trials
`and recently also as a registered treatment in the US
`has been obtained with Centocor’s anti-TNF antibody
`infliximab. This compound has been demonstrated to
`be effective in the induction of clinical improvement
`and remission of moderate to severe active Crohn’s
`disease, refractory to standard treatment
`in most
`patients. In addition, anti-TNF therapy appears to be
`effective for both Crohn’s ileitis and colitis as for
`complicated disease with enterocutaneous fistulae.
`However, since infliximab induces rapid healing of
`inflamed tissue as was first observed in perianal
`fistulae, there is some concern about the potential
`induction or worsening of strictures by anti-TNF
`treatment. The role of anti-TNF agents in the
`Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs (2000) 9(1)
`
`Downloaded by [AbbVie Library] at 07:40 28 September 2017
`
`

`

`110 Anti-TNF agents in Crohn’s disease
`
`maintenance of remission has not been clearly
`established at present and therefore immune-
`modulator treatment such as azathioprine is not
`discontinued after
`infliximab infusion even if
`repeated infusions of infliximab can now be offered.
`More studies will be needed to evaluate the benefit of
`combining anti-TNF therapy with methotrexate in
`Crohn’s disease. This combination has been shown to
`be superior to infliximab monotherapy in RA [32].
`
`Although tolerance to anti-TNF agents is generally
`very good, infusion reactions and delayed hypersensi-
`tivity have been observed. Infusion reactions are
`generally mild and easily controlled with standard
`measures. The optimal dosing interval and concomi-
`tant therapy to avoid the formation of HACA (for
`infliximab) and HAHA (for CDP571), which are
`clearly associated with reactions to repeated infusion,
`needs to be determined in the future. As far as the risk
`for lymphoproliferative disorders is concerned, a
`careful and long-term follow-up of
`the growing
`cohort of Crohn’s disease patients treated with
`infliximab will be needed. As data on the use of other
`TNF-binding molecules such as CDP571, etanercept
`and thalidomide are accumulating, a further
`expansion of
`the use of anti-TNF agents in the
`treatment of IBD is to be expected.
`
`Bibliography
`
`Papers of special note have been highlighted as:
`(cid:129)
`of interest
`(cid:129)(cid:129)
`of considerable interest
`
`1.
`
`(cid:129)
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`(cid:129)
`
`5.
`
`FIOCCHI C: Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and
`pathogenesis. Gastroenterology (1998) 115:182-205.
`Detailed review of the current hypotheses on the aetiology
`of Crohn’s disease.
`
`VAN DEVENTER SJH, ELSON CO, FEDORAK RN: Multiple
`doses of intravenous interleukin 10 in steroid-
`refractory Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology (1997)
`113:383-389.
`
`SANDS BE, BANK S, SHINSKY CA et al.: Preliminary
`evaluation of safety and activity of recombinant
`interleukin 11 in patients with active Crohn’s disease.
`Gastroenterology (1999) 117:58-64.
`
`NEURATH MF, FUSS I, PASPARAKIS M et al.: Predominant
`pathogenic role of tumor necrosis factor in experi-
`mental colitis in mice. Eur.
`Immunol. (1997)
`J.
`27:1743-1750.
`This paper provides firm evidence of the importance of TNF
`in an experimental model of IBD colitis.
`
`MURCH SH, BRAEGER CP, WALKER-SMITH JA et al.:
`Location of tumor necrosis factor alpha by
`
`© Ashley Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`(cid:129)(cid:129)
`
`10.
`
`(cid:129)
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`(cid:129)
`
`immunehistochemistry in chronic inflammatory
`bowel disease. Gut (1993) 34:1705-1709.
`
`MURCH SH, LAMKIN VA, SAVAGE MO et al.: Serum
`concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha in
`childhood chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut
`(1991) 32:913-917.
`
`AGARWALL BB, KOHR WJ, HASS PE et al.: Human tumor
`necrosis factor. Production, purification and charac-
`terization. J. Biol. Chem. (1985) 260:2345-2354.
`
`SMITH RA, BAGLIONI C: The active form of tumor
`necrosis factor is a trimer.
`J. Biol. Chem. (1987)
`262:6951-6954.
`
`FLIER JS, UNDERHILL LH: The tumor necrosis factor
`ligand and receptor families. N. Engl. J. Med. (1996)
`334:1717-1725.
`Concise review of the molecular biology of TNF and its
`importance in human disease.
`
`KNIGHT DM, TRINTH H, LE J et al.: Construction and
`initial characterization of a mouse-human chimeric
`anti TNFantibody. Mol. Immunol. (1993) 30:1443-1453.
`Original paper describing the dicovery of the first clinically
`relevant monoclonal anti- TNF-antibody.
`
`ISAACS JD, WATTS RA, HAZELMAN BL et al.: Humanised
`monoclonal antibody therapy for rheumatoid
`arthritis. Lancet (1992) 340:748-752.
`
`SIEGEL SA, SHEALY DJ, NAKADA MT et al.: The
`mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody cA2
`neutralizes TNF in vitro and protects transgenic mice
`from cachexia and TNF lethality in vivo. Cytokine (1995)
`7:15-25.
`
`SCALLON BJ, MOORE MA, TRINH H et al.: Chimeric
`anti-TNF-a monoclonal antibody binds recombinant
`transmembrane TNF-= and activates immune effector
`functions. Cytokine (1995) 7:251-259.
`
`PLEVY SE, LANDERS CJ, PREHN J et al.: A role for TNF=
`and mucosal T helper-1 cytokines in the pathogenesis
`of Crohn’s disease. J. Immunol. (1997) 159:6367-6282.
`This paper provides experimental evidence that
`TNF-antibodies interacts with TNF to ameliorate Crohn’s
`disease.
`
`15. WAGNER C, MACE K, DEWOODY K et al.: Infliximab
`treatment benefits correlate with pharmacodynamic
`parameters in Crohn’s disease patients. Digestion
`(1998) 59:124-125.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`REMICADE (INFLIXIMAB). Product monograph (1999).
`
`MOHLER KM, TORRANCE DS, SMITH CA et al.: Soluble
`tumor necr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket