throbber
JULY 2000 VOL 59 SUPPLEMENT [
`
`nnals of the
`Rheumatic
`'Diseases
`
`eular
`
`81
`?L•
`
`1r
`
`Annual European Congress of
`RHEUMATOLOGY
`R 20
`Abstracts
`Nice, 21-24 June 2000
`
`4The EULAR Journal
`
`Ex. 1107 - Page 1
`
`

`

`EULAR 2000
`
`•
`;0E0561 SIX MONTH EFFICACY OF THE FULLY HUMAN ANTI-TNF ANTIBODY D2E7 IN RHEUMATOID
`ARTHRITIS
`n de Pawl, 11,,Rau2 C. Breed*, r ift Kalcfpn', M.G. mapise5 M, SOFfienkirchne", R Emery!, G.A Burniesrerg, H. Zeldkr
`11' Moinsopolilos D Compagnone R Dressler , pompon! , kiippee
`'
`
`P (cid:9)J UnieersiOe Leiden, The Netherfandh Ithemakflalk Raangen; 'Universe Erlangen; Universirdt Altinehen; g
`UPtiverJOy Wiimegeork
`Meetpnisehe Hochschule Hannover: Knoll AG Ludwigshafen, Germany, Unlversky Liege. Belgium, Leeds
`Univerantil (cid:9)
`General Infirmeny; UK. thriversrly Athens, Greece
`Objeelire: Dose-finding phase it seedy comparing 3 dose levels or D2E7, a Mal iy human anti-TNE antibody, and placebo over 3 months in
`patients with long standing Naive rheumatoid erthriliS. followed by 3 months blinded D2E7 lireetliellt. • (cid:9)
`.
`Methods: A 061 of 283 patients were included in this randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Overall patient characteristics at
`baseline (median): age 53 years, duration (IRA 8 yours. TX 30, 51C II, ESR 45 mnvb, CRP 5.1 insfa 4 previous DMARDI. DMARDn
`were discontinued at least 4 weeks before study treatment. Patients welt randomised equally into four arms to receive weekly doses of either
`D2E7 at 20, 40, 80 mg or placebo by subcutaneous (s.e.) self injection for 3 months. After month 3 placebo treated patients were given still
`blinded 40 mg D2E7 weekly, wh ite all other doses were continued as modernised.
`Results: Clinical 14$13433305 after 3 and 6 months of treatment are summarised below based on ITT analysis:
`I Response er Improvement
`Plea/40 mg 20 mg 40 mg 00 stg
`Tree anent
`Trearnens period [rrontbs] 316
`316
`316
` 13/59
`49156 53/64 56/63
`ACR 23
`57169 61/63 55/63
`'NC Enedianl
`41/54 59/60 61/42
`00c I/14.411Rn]
`54159 67/54 64/66
`CRP (Median)
`
`5/55
`16/56
`1/67
`
`3/6
`
`The typo and incidence of adverse picots was similar between the three dale groups of 0217 end placebo.
`For ail efficacy parameters studied, all doses of D2E7 were gal iS iitally significantly superior so placebo (p e 0.001). 20, 40 and
`80 rnp/week were statistically equally efficacious when given s.e. in patients with active RA. The treatment benefit was stable for 611
`parieleterS over
`
`Concurrent Session OS: Rheum:, Oki Arthritis - Treatment
`
`Supported by 86 0nrolricla educational gram from Wyeth AyerSi.
`Page i
`
`Ex. 1107 - Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket