throbber
April NM
`
`(cid:9) (cid:9)
`
`4TTENUATION OF RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE RETRF.ATMENT
`kpuiXIIIIAR INFUSIONS FOR ACTIVE CROHN'S IHSFASE
`160; puTENTIAL FACTORS THAT MINIMIZE DECREASED
`RESPONSE,
`ILam, Eric A. Vasil iauskas, Maria T. Abreu, Philip V. Hassand,
`Lei
`geiceich, Joanne Gatennie, Laura Record, Thomas F. Schaible,
`
`F. Taiwan. Cedars-Sinai Mcd Ctr. Los Angeles, CA; Centocor,
`Stephan
`efee ern, PA.
`Initial Inniximale(5-20mg/kg) treatment(tx) for active CD is associated
`with a 65% response and 33% remission rate at 4 wks. However, the
`efficacy of Infliximab rctreatment(retx) for CD flare is unclear. AIM: to
`.4o1y me elliacy and safety of open labeled retx hdlixintab(5mg/kg) for
`recurrent CD. Methods: Grourngiell enrolled in Centocor C01 (cid:9)
`16 &
`em64e24 trials between 8/1/95 - 11130/98. Pts received Infliximab(5-
`-elmgete) for CDAI >220, then 0-4 maintenance infusions(inf) Q8wks X
`4. After 2A yrs(mean1.1.3 retx infsii5mg/kgi for CDAI (cid:9)
`21.16 were given,
`ekes were kept stable. Gp 2:enrollersent between 10/20198- 11/1/99. After
`Leda infi5tagiarge 1-2 vets infs(5mgfkg)fur CDAI > 15(1 were given.
`Change in reeds were allowed. CDAI was dune at wk 0. and 4 after each
`eiresiort. Response = j CDA1a70, or achievement of CDAI s 150. Re.
`mission = CDAIs150. Results: A significant decreasing trend in ACDAI
`sficr retx lots occurred in Gpl(p=.0116),laut not Gp2tp=.2.879). In Gp 1.
`"1:..resp and remission was also lower with retx. In Gp2. median 3,CDAI
`in % rasp and remission was minimal. Gp2
`after rets#1 decreased. but (cid:9)
`median wk0 CDAls were progressively lower with retie One delayed
`hypersensitivity rm. occurred in each Gp I & Gp 2. Gp I; mean #day5 last
`inf#1 e. 863. Op 2; Mail *days between inf
`maintenance inf (cid:9)
`1eirem#1 = 82,and retx#1--k- *2 =107. 82% in Op 2 were txd with
`6MPAZA or MTX vs 20% in Op I. Conclusion: Concurrent use of
`ironemorrieduLatory drugs with Inflixisnati therapy, and early retreatment
`fee CD flares may limit potential attenuation of response to multiple
`infusions.
`
`Oros* 1
`
`Group 2
`
`irltisiar. a
`N
`Idiumirb rnsIll
`Median Cat) s
`(cid:9) 0
`Median .1 .\ CDAI ..
`Fess I%/ •
`Renisport 4%).
`
`1
`tO
`5,10,20
`291
`160
`7(70)
`5(501
`
`Rat( 1 Reot 2 Rale 3
`10
`5
`9
`5
`5
`5
`333
`327
`264
`68
`53
`7
`7470/ NA
`2040
`04I
`21201
`2124
`
`1
`11
`5
`286
`178
`9021
`6(731
`
`RI* 1 Rani 2
`10
`5
`5
`5
`273
`230
`111
`182
`4450)
`4931
`411301
`60901
`
`- n.
`
`3598
`A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CDP571, A HUMAN-
`IZED ANTIROI)'i TO TNFA, IN MODERATELY TO SEVERELY
`ACTIVE CROHN'S DISEASE.
`William 1, Sandlwirn, Stephan R. Targan, Stephen Ia. Hanauer, Daniel H.
`Present. Lloyd R. Sutherland, Michael A. Kamm, Doug C. Wolf, J. P.
`Baker, Christopher J. Hawkey. Patricia K. Heath, Brian G. Feagan, Mayo
`Clio. Rochester. MN; Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA; Univ of
`Chicago. Chicago, IL; Mount Sinai Sch of Medicine, New York, NY; Univ
`of Calgary. Calgary. AB, Canada; St Mark's Hosp. London, United King-
`dam: Atlanta Gastroenterology Assoc, Atlanta, GA; Univ of Toronto,
`Toronto. ON, Canada; Univ Hosp. Nottingham. United Kingdom; Celltech/
`Chirescientx, Slough, United Kingdom: Univ of Western Ontario, London,
`ON, Canada_
`BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) re plays a pivotal role in
`the inflammation of Cmhn's disease (CD). AIMS: To determine the eine
`caey and safety of the humanized anti-TNF antibody. CDP571, for induc-
`tion and maintenance of clinical improvement in patients with moderate to
`.everely active Crohr's disease. METHODS: 169 adult patients with
`nesecrate to severely active CD (CDA1 score 220-4501 were enrolled into
`J 24 week study and randomized to one of six treatment arms: I) CDP571
`:0 metikg at week 0 followed by 10 mg/kg at weeks 8 and 16; 2) CDP571
`10 nig/kg at weeks 0. 8, and 16; 3) placebo at weeks 0, 8. and 16; 4)
`CDP571 20 mg/kg at week 0 followed by 10 mg/kg at week 12; 5) CDP571
`10 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 12; and 6) placebo at weeks 0 and 12. Concern-
`ment medications were held constant at the pre-study dose, The Croho's
`
`AGA AASS
`
`disease activity index (CDAI) score was determined serially throughout the
`study. Clinical improvement was defined as a decrease in the CDAI score
`of > 70 points from the week 0 score. RESULTS: Clinical improvement
`at week 2 occurred in 15/56 (27%) of the placebo group, 29154 (54%) of
`the 10 mg/kg group (p=0_005); and 21/57 (37%) of the 20 mg/kg group
`(p.‘0.256). The survival curve of time to withdrawal during the 24 weeks
`study was significant for CDP57I compared to placebo for the 12 week
`dosing group (p=0.012) but not the 8 week dosing group (p=0.2291. The
`median change in CDAI for the I Orngfkg 12 weekly dosing group remained
`70 points below baseline throughout the 24 weeks of the study. Two of 13
`(15%) of placebo patients with draining fistiala.s at entry had closure of
`>1= 505E. of fistulas during the study compared with 12/24 (50%) in the
`CDP57I groups ip,-0.074). The frequency of adverse events AEs) were
`similar in the CDP571 and placebo groups: AEs at the time of infusion
`were 12% vs 7% (placeboXp=0.424); infections 14% vs 10% p=0.631);
`anti-CDP571 antibodies 9% vs (1% (p=0,016); and natimucleur antibodies
`plus anti- asDNA 7% vs 0% (p=0.052). There were no cases of lymphoma,
`drug induced lupus, or delayed hypersensitivity reactions in the study.
`CONCLUSIONS: CDP57I is effective in inducing clinical response at two
`weeks in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn s disease. The
`optimal dose Ls 10 mg/kg. Benefit was seen with repeat dosing and the
`optimal dosing frequency is every 12 weeks. CDP57I also closes draining
`tistid.es. CDP57I is safe and well tolerated, Support: Celhech/Chimerience.
`
`3599
`A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED,
`MULTI-CENTER TRIAL OF THE ENGINEERED HUMAN ANTI-
`BODY TO TNF (CDP5711 FOR STEROID SPARING AND MAIN-
`TENANCE OF REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH STEROID-DE-
`PENDENT CROHN'S DISEASE.
`Brian G. Ragan, William J. Sandborn, J. P. Baker. F. Cominelli, Lloyd R.
`Sutherland, C. D. Elson. Bruce Salzberg., A. Archambauh. Charles N.
`Bernstein. G. R. Lichtenstein, Patricia K. Heath, Stephen B. Hanauer.
`London Clin Trials Research Group, London. ON, Canada; Mayo Clio,
`Rochester, MN; Univ of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univ of Virginia.
`Charlottesville, VA; Univ of Calgary. Calgary. AB, Canada; Urns. of
`Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Atlanta Gastroenterology' As-
`soc, Atlanta, GA; Univ of Montreal, Montreal. PQ. Canada: Univ of
`Manitoba, Winnipeg. M13, Canada; Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
`PA; Celltech Therapeutics Inc, Slough, United Kingdom; Univ of Chicago
`Hospitals, Chicago. IL.
`BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis freetor(TNFOr plays a pivotal role in
`the inflammation of Crulan's disease (CD). We determined the efficacy and
`safety of humanized anti-TNF antibody, CDP571, for steroid sparing and
`maintenance of remission in patients with steroid-dependent CD, METH-
`ODS: 71 patients with steruid-dependent CD (CDAI < 150, AND a
`prednimme dose of 15-40 mg/day or a budesrmide dose of 9mghlay for >
`8 weeks, AND a failed attempt to taper prednisone or budesanide within 8
`weeks) were enrolled into a 16 week study and randomized to one of two
`treatments: 1) CDP571 20 mg/kg at week 0 followed by 10 mg/kg at week
`8; 2) placebo at weeks 0 and 8. Predoisone was decreased from the week
`0 dose by 5 mg/week to a dose of 10 mg/day, and then by 2.5 mg/week
`until discontinuation. Budesonide was decreased from 9 mg/day to 6
`meduy for 3 weeks, 3 mg/day for 3 weeks, and then discontinued.
`5-Aminosalicylatee, patine antimemholites and methotremne were held
`constant at the pre-study dose. The primary outcome was defined as total
`steroid withdrawal without a flare of CD (increase in CDAI to > 220
`points). RESULTS: 39 patients received CDP571 and 32 received placebo:
`the demographic characteristics of the patients were not different in the two
`groups. At week 40, 17/39 (43.6%) of patients who received CDP571
`remained free of a disease flare as compered with only 7/32 (21.9 %) of
`thuse who received placebo (P = 0.049). CDP57I therapy was well
`tolerated. No severe infusion reactions were identified, Serious adverse
`events occurred in 12.5% of patients receiving placebo and 17.9% of those
`assigned to active treatment; the majority of these were disease related and
`none were attributed tee CDP571 therapy, Only one patient (2.6%) devel-
`oped detectable antibody to CDP57I. 6.7% of patients developed anti-
`dont-Fie-stranded DNA antibodies. No CILSC5 of lupus or lymphoma oc-
`curred. CONCLUSIONS: CDP57 I is an effective therapy which facilitates
`withdrawal of coniecisteroids in adults with chronic steroid dependent CD.
`Therapy with CDP571 is associated with a low incidence of adverse events.
`A low race of auto-antibody formation was mime and antibodies to
`CDP571 occurred infrequently.
`
`Ex. 1099 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Supplement to
`
`lutill8 • Nuniber 4 • Suppl 2
`Part 1 of 2
`
`...
`
` e
`
`Digest' e ease Week
`and the
`Olst Annual Meeting of the Amer n
`i
`Gastroenterologicai Association it
`May 21-24, 2000, SJn Dieg9, to
`
`Program of the Annual Meeting of the Amerk n
`astroenter.logical Association, the A erican i
`iv he Study of Liver Dise es, the
`Associa r: .
`Gastro.-Jr,r,- 4 * 6 Research Group, the' ociety fo
`Surge , , the Alimentary Tract, and the American
`Societ or Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
`r
`Abstracts of Paper SUbmitted to the American 4 1
`Gastroenterological Association
`i
`Abstracts of PapereSubmitted to the Anjerican (cid:9)
`Associa'on for le Study of Liver Diseases
`. i
`i
`o th Society fo
`61
`'q
`
`go
`
`11
`
`▪ Abstrac s of Paers Submi r (cid:9)
`- Surgery of the Mime itary (cid:9)
`
`Ex. 1099 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Notes
`
`VEVil (cid:9)
`
`F UECIT11.7.-
`
`_ (cid:9)
`
`6 9Clikq
`
`LtBRABY
`
`Ex. 1099 - Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket