throbber
THE LANCET
`
`Volume 345, Number 8946c Founded 1823 • Published weekly • Saturday 11 February 1995 ,/
`
`/
`
`EDITORIAL
`333 Canada's threatened healthcare system
`
`COMMENTARY
`335 World summit on social development
`J Havard
`336 Do cell membrane dynamics participate in insulin resistance?
`M-A Devynck
`337 Temperature and cardiovascular mortality K-T Khaw
`338 Antipyretics in severe sepsis
`
`F Shann
`
`ARTICLES
`339 Public health impact of Rwandan refugee crisis: what happened
`in Goma, Zaire, in July, 1994? Goma Epidemiology Group
`344 Effects of pulsed 13-stimulant therapy on P-adrenoceptors and
`chronotropic responsiveness in chronic heart failure
`S Adamopoulos, M Piepoli, F Qiang, E Pissimissis, M Davies, L Bernardi, C Forfar,
`P Sleight, A Coats
`349 Long-term results of single course of adjuvant intraportal
`chemotherapy for colorectal cancer Swiss Group for Clinical
`Cancer Research (SAKK)
`353 Temperature extremes and mortality from coronary heart
`disease and cerebral infarction in elderly Chinese W-H Pan,
`L-A Li, M-J Tsai
`
`SHORT REPORTS
`355 Hepatitis B virus infection without immunological markers after
`open-heart surgery (cid:9)
`J W F Rasenack, H-J Schlayer, F Hettler, T Peters,
`S Preisler-Adams, W Gerok
`357 Cell membrane dynamics and insulin resistance in non-insulin-
`dependent diabetes mellitus
`P Tong, T Thomas, T Berrish, D Humphriss,
`L Barriocanal, M Stewart, M Walker, R Wilkinson, KGMM Alberti
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH
`359 Why treatment centres failed to prevent cholera deaths among
`Rwandan refugees in Goma, Zaire A K Siddique, A Salam, M S Islam,
`K Akram, R N Majumdar, K Zaman, N Fronczak, S Laston
`
`REVIEW ARTICLE
`362 Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, and coronary heart disease
`G K Goode, J P Miller, A M Heagerty
`
`************** S -DIGIT 20;40
`LANCE 02(122400 0 01 nO n26 0E12
`
`
`
`GROUP PERIODICAL REGISTRATION
`LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
`WASHINGTON. DC 20E40-0001
`
`CLINICAL PRACTICE
`365 Subcutaneous immunoglobulin
`replacement in patients with
`primary antibody deficiencies:
`safety and costs (cid:9)
`A Gardulf,
`V Andersen, JI3jOrkander,
`D Ericson, S S Froland,
`R Gustafson, L HammarstrOm,
`M B Jacobsen, E Jonsson,
`G Moller, T Nystrom, B Soeberg,
`C I E Smith
`
`VIEWPOINT
`369 Should morbidity replace
`mortality as an endpoint for
`clinical trials in intensive
`care? (cid:9)
`A J Petros,
`J C Marshall, H K F van Saene
`
`Bookshelf
`371 (cid:9) Raising Lazarus
`372 (cid:9) Ethics in clinical practice; Ethics
`and biotechnology
`The pediatric spine
`373 (cid:9) Cystic fibrosis
`Doctors, dilemmas, decisions
`
`376 (cid:9)
`
`News
`375 (cid:9) The new politics of risk
`assessment
`Australian Northern Territories
`to debate euthanasia
`India's kidney transplant racket?
`Anxious times for German
`university hospitals
`France wavering about
`decriminalisation of drugs
`377 (cid:9) Bioethics convention
`endorsed—at a price
`Regulating ICSI in France
`Cautious optimism over new
`anti-HIV agents
`378 (cid:9) UK to study congenital limb-
`reduction defects
`Money for UK medical research
`379 (cid:9) Conflicting views on alleged
`plagiarism
`Sao Paulo's illegal pharmacies
`380 Towards a tighter PHLS
`UK health department urged
`to take the lead
`Russian medical aid
`for Chechnya
`News in brief
`381 Letters to the Editor
`see contents list inside
`
`The Lancet® (ISSN 0099-5355) is published weekly by The Lancet Ltd. The Lancet's agent is located at 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010-5107. Tel: 212-633-3800.
`Fax: 212-633-3850. Second Class Postage paid at New York, NY and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Lancet, 655 Avenue of the Americas,
`New York, NY 10010-5107. All literary matter in The Lancet is Copyright. The Lancet Ltd, 1995. The Lancet® is a registered trademark.
`
`ra
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 1
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`For Patients With Chronk Bronchitis,
`Infection May Be Just The Beginning.
`Haemophilus influenzae
`can lead to a vicious circle of
`respiratory decline.
`H influenzae has been shown to persist in
`the sputum of many patients with
`chronic bronchitis, and has been shown
`to slow ciliary beating and increase
`mucus production in vitro.
`Cipro® Tablets give you the power to
`aggressively treat H influenzae and
`resolve infections for many chronic
`bronchitics, before things turn vicious.
`
`Additionally, in two studies that
`included other pathogens, a total of
`95% of bronchitis patients (n=84) had
`, favorable outcomes:
`So the next time bacterial infection
`starts something you'd prefer to avoid,
`trust the power of Cipro® Tablets.
`Cipro® Tablets are indicated for lower
`respiratory infections caused by
`Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
`Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis,
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus
`influenzae, Haemophilus paraintluenzae,
`Streptococcus pneumoniae.
`
`Power proven against
`H influenzae.
`In three studies of bronchitis patients,
`where pathogens were identified, all
`patients with H influenzae (n=43)
`responded favorably* to Cipro® Tablets.
`
`*Favorable outcome defined as improvement or resolution
`of clinical signs and symptoms.
`t In vitro activity does not necessarily imply a correlation
`with in vivo results.
`
`ra
`
`(ciprofloxacin Ha) Tablets
`500 mg 750 mg
`The most potent fluoroquinolone.t
`
`Most frequently reported adverse events (>1%): nausea; diarrhea; vomiting;
`abdominal pain/discomfort; headache; rash; restlessness.
`
`Please see CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS sections
`of brief summary of prescribing information on following page.
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 2
`
`

`

`ltrItT opr,
`FEB 1 5
`GROUP
`COPY
`The 0
`
`For Patients With Chronic Bronchitis,
`Infection May Be Just The Beginning.
`Haemophilus influenzae
`can lead to a vicious circle of
`respiratory decline.
`H influenzae has been shown to persist in
`the sputum of many patients with
`chronic bronchitis, and has been shown
`to slow ciliary beating and increase
`mucus production in vitro.
`Cipro® Tablets give you the power to
`aggressively treat H influenzae and
`resolve infections for many chronic
`bronchitics, before things turn vicious.
`
`Additionally, in two studies that
`included other pathogens, a total of
`95% of bronchitis patients (n=84) had
`favorable outcomes.*
`So the next time bacterial infection
`starts something you'd prefer to avoid,
`trust the power of Cipro® Tablets.
`Cipro® Tablets are indicated for lower
`respiratory infections caused by
`Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
`Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis,
`Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus
`influenzae, Haemophilus paraintluenzae,
`Streptococcus pneumoniae.
`
`Power proven against
`H influenzae.
`In three studies of bronchitis patients,
`where pathogens were identified, all
`patients with H inlluenzae (n=43)
`responded favorably* to Cipro® Tablets.
`
`*Favorable outcome defined as improvement or resolution
`of clinical signs and symptoms.
`In vitro activity does not necessarily imply a correlation
`with in vivo results.
`
`Pro
`
`(ciprofloxacin HCI) Tablets
`500 mg 750 mg
`The most potent fluoroquinolone.t
`
`Most frequently reported adverse events (>1%): nausea; diarrhea; vomiting;
`abdominal pain/discomfort; headache; rash; restlessness.
`
`Please see CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS sections
`of brief summary of prescribing information on following page.
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Volume 345, Number 8946 • Founded 1823 • Published weekly • Saturday 11 February 1995
`
`EDITORIAL OFFICES
`LONDON
`42 Bedford Square,
`London WC1B 3SL, UK
`
`Telephone 0171 436 4981
`International + 44 171 436 4981
`
`Fax 0171 436 7550
`International + 44 171 436 7550
`
`Editor
`Robin Fox MB FRCPE
`
`Deputy editor
`David Sharp MA
`
`Senior editor
`Imogen Evans MD PhD FRCPC
`
`Staff editors
`John Bignall MB
`Vivien Choo MB
`Stephanie Clark PhD
`Astrid James BSc MB
`John McConnell BSc
`David McNamee MSc PhD
`Rosalind Osmond MSc
`Pia Pini BSc FIBMS
`Sarah Ramsay BA
`Clare Thompson BSc
`
`NEW YORK
`655 Avenue of the Americas,
`New York, NY 10010, USA
`Tel 212 633 3810 (fax 3850)
`
`Assistant editor
`Richard Horton BSc MB
`
`Associate editor
`David H Frankel MD
`
`INTERNATIONAL
`ADVISORY BOARD
`Michael Baum FRCS (London)
`Henri Bismuth MD (Paris)
`lain Chalmers MSc (Oxford)
`A J Dunning MD (Amsterdam)
`Eric Espiner FRACP (Christchurch)
`Robert Fletcher MD (Boston)
`Suzanne Fletcher MD (Boston)
`Karen Gelmon FRCPC (Vancouver)
`Johan Giesecke MD (Stockholm)
`Kelsey Harrison NNmA (Liverpool)
`Jun-ichi Hata MD (Tokyo)
`Sven Hernberg MD (Helsinki)
`Ralph Horwitz MD (New Haven)
`T Jacob John FRCPE (Vellore)
`Yuet Wai Kan FRS (San Francisco)
`Jay A Levy MD (San Francisco)
`Giuseppe Remuzzi MD (Bergamo)
`Juan Rodes MD (Barcelona)
`Frank Sham, FRACP (Melbourne)
`Thomas Sherwood FRCP (Cambridge)
`Michael Steel FRCPE (St Andrews)
`John Swales FRCP (Leicester)
`Jan Vandenbroucke MD (Leiden)
`David Weatherall FRS (Oxford)
`Yoshio Yazaki MD (Tokyo)
`
`Letters to the Editor
`
`381 Travellers' diarrhoea and use of
`single-dose ciprofloxacin
`D C Fiore;
`M J G Farthing;
`M P Connor, A D Green;
`C Hall, J Cornell;
`D Maher, A D Harries
`
`382 Topical treatment for Dupuytren's
`contracture
`A G Freeman
`
`382 Subcutaneous gammaglobulin for
`patients with secondary
`hypogammaglobulinaemia
`L Hammarstrom and others
`
`383 End of New Zealand asthma
`epidemic
`C Schuijt, H Staudinger;
`P Ernst, S Suissa
`
`384 Cardiovascular disease in the
`tropics, ethics, and need for action
`S Lindeberg
`
`385 Dual role for Afipia fells and
`Rochalimaea henselae in cat-
`scratch disease
`S Alkan and others
`
`385 Outcome in offspring of women with
`mild hyperphenylalaninaemia
`I Smith, S Tillotson;
`H L Levy and others;
`D Smithells
`
`386 Sudden infant death syndrome and
`volatile antimony compounds
`P N Gates and others
`
`387 Unnecessary D & Cs
`J G Hooker
`387 Smoking, Alzheimer's disease, and
`confounding with genes
`B L Plassman and others
`
`388 Shifting indications for
`hysterectomy
`J Studd;
`A Saha;
`M Hickey, I S Fraser
`
`389
`
`Is contrast enhancement in cranial
`computed tomography necessary?
`P Demaerel and others
`
`389 Folic acid in prevention of neural
`tube defects
`N J Wald, M P Gilbertson;
`W Doyle
`
`390 HIV testing in prison
`T P Flanigan
`
`390 Nitric oxide production and
`heart failure
`D S Winlaw and others
`
`391 Superoxide dismutase and
`amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
`R J Swingler and others
`
`391 Parental influence on inheritance
`of familial amyotrophic lateral
`sclerosis
`R W Orrell and others
`
`392
`
`Involvement of macrophages in
`lethal forms of graft-versus-host
`disease
`T Facon and others
`
`393 Breastfeeding and neurological
`status
`J F Orlebeke and others;
`C I Lanting and others
`
`393 Migration of Echinococcus
`granulosus via lymphatics
`P J Cant
`
`394 Lack of effect of nedocromil sodium
`in ACE-inhibitor-induced cough
`H Puolijoki, M Rekiaro;
`J G F Cleland
`
`395
`
`When practice makes perfect
`A Karni
`
`395 Hepatitis B vaccine boosting among
`young healthy adults
`M Gesemann, N Scheiermann;
`W R Gilks and others
`
`396 Efficacy of lamivudine on replication
`of hepatitis B virus in HIV-infected
`patients
`Y Benhamou and others
`
`397 Vertical transmission of hepatitis
`A virus
`I Tanaka and others
`
`397 Risk factors in melanoma
`F H J Rampen
`
`398 Delay in onset of malaria with
`mefloquine prophylaxis
`J H Day, R H Behrens
`
`398 Subacute cutaneous lupus
`erythematosus associated with
`cilazapril
`M L Fernandez-Diaz and others
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 4
`
`

`

`THE LANCET
`
`Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in patients with
`primary antibody deficiencies: safety and costs
`
`Ann Gardulf, Vagn Andersen, Janne Bjorkander, Diddi Ericson, Stig S Froland, Rolf Gustafson, Lennart Hammarstrom,
`Marten B Jacobsen, Egon Jonsson, Gudrun Moller, Tiina Nystrom, Blom Soeberg, C I Edvard Smith
`
`Summary
`Immunoglobulins (IgG) as replacement therapy in primary
`antibody deficiencies can be given as intramuscular
`injections, or as intravenous or subcutaneous infusions. Our
`aims were to obtain information on the frequency of
`adverse systemic reactions during subcutaneous therapy,
`the occurrence and intensity of tissue reactions at the
`infusion sites, and serum IgG changes. Furthermore, we
`compared costs between the different replacement
`regimes.
`Our study included 165 patients (69 women, 96 men,
`aged 13-76 years) with primary hypogammaglobulinaemia
`or IgG-subclass deficiencies. Data were compiled from
`questionnaires filled in by the patients and from their
`medical records. 33 168 subcutaneous infusions (27 030
`in home therapy) had been given. 106 (of which 16 were at
`home) adverse systemic reactions (100 mild, 6 moderate)
`were recorded in 28 patients (17%). No severe or
`anaphylactoid reactions occurred. Despite large
`immunoglobulin volumes given during 434 patient years
`(28 480 infusions), no signs have been found that indicate
`the transmission of hepatitis virus. Transient tissue
`reactions occurred at the infusion sites but were not
`troublesome to most patients and we found significant
`increases in mean serum IgG. The use of subcutaneous
`instead of intravenous infusions at home would reduce
`the yearly cost per patient for the health-care sector by
`US $10 100 in Sweden alone.
`We conclude that subcutaneous administration of IgG is
`a safe and convenient method of providing
`immunoglobulins. We were able to reach serum IgG
`concentrations similar to those by the intravenous therapy
`and we found that the method could also be used
`successfully in patients with previous severe or
`anaphylactoid reactions to intramuscular injections.
`Lancet 1995; 345: 365-69
`
`Karolinska Institute at Huddinge University Hospital
`(A Gardulf RN, PhD, L Hammarstrom MD, R Gustafson MD,
`T Nystrom RN, C I Edvard Smith Nit)), Infectious Diseases
`(R Gustafson) and Department of Internal Medicine
`(Prof E Jonsson PhD); Karolinska Institute at Karolinska Hospital
`(A Gardulf); The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment
`in Health Care (Prof E Jonsson, G Mailer RPT, BA);
`Karolinska Institute, Department of Physical Therapy (G Moller);
`Sahlgrenska University Hospital, The Asthma and
`Allergy Research Centre (J Bjorkander MD, D Ericson RN),
`Gothenburg, Sweden; Rigshospitalet, Department of
`Internal Medicine TTA (V Andersen rvio, B Soeberg MD),
`Copenhagen, Denmark; Rikshospitalet, Section of Clinical
`Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Department A
`(Prof S S Froland MD, M B Jacobsen MD), Oslo, Norway
`Correspondence to: Dr Ann Gardulf, Department of Clinical
`Immunology, F71, Huddinge University Hospital,
`S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
`
`Vol 345 • February 11, 1995
`
`Introduction
`People with primary hypogammaglobulinaemia, such as
`common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) or X-linked
`agammaglobulinaemia (XLA), need to be given IgG
`replacement therapy.' Patients with selective IgG-subclass
`deficiency, with or without simultaneous IgA deficiency,
`may also benefit.',2 Replacement therapy can be given as
`intramuscular injections or as intravenous or sub-
`cutaneous infusions of immunoglobulin preparations. The
`last two may be administered at home by the patients
`themselves,5-' and subcutaneous administration,' is
`becoming more popular. This change is mainly because of
`reports of low risk of adverse systemic reactions'," and
`normal serum IgG concentrations'""-" being achieved.
`However, reports of the subcutaneous method have so far
`been restricted to patients with CVID or XLA and to
`studies on relatively few patients, although treatment has
`been given to adults,b,','-12 and children.804-16 Furthermore,
`most of the published results have been based on slow
`subcutaneous infusions.'-'2,'4-'5
`We collated our multi-centre study to obtain
`information on: the frequency of adverse systemic
`reactions during hospital and home therapy; the
`occurrence and perceived intensity of tissue reactions at
`the infusion sites; and the serum IgG concentrations. We
`compared the costs of different replacement regimens.
`
`Patients and methods
`Patients
`165 patients (69 women, 96 men, mean age 43, range 13-76
`years) with ongoing or previous subcutaneous replacement
`therapy were included from 4 centres in 3 Scandinavian
`countries: Stockholm and Gothenburg in Sweden; Copenhagen
`in Denmark; and Oslo in Norway. The sample included patients
`with CVID (n 101), XLA (n 7) and IgG-subclass deficiencies
`with (n 5) or without (n 52) simultaneous IgA deficiency. Before
`initiation of subcutaneous therapy, most ptients (n 126, 76%)
`were treated by intramuscular injections (n 69), intravenous
`infusions (n 13), or alternate intramuscular injections and
`intravenous infusions (n 44).
`From 165 patients, subjects 18 years or older who received
`ongoing subcutaneous therapy and were able to read and write,
`were asked to report their opinions of the subcutaneous method.
`158 patients fulfilled the criteria and 152, 89 women and 63 men
`(96%), answered the questionnaire.
`
`Clinical details
`Data of previous and ongoing immunoglobulin therapy, adverse
`systemic reactions, liver function tests, and serum IgG
`concentrations were compiled from medical records. Blood
`samples for IgG and IgG subclasses were always collected as
`preinfusion samples during hospital treatment. In home therapy,
`blood collection varied with respect to IgG administration. Blood
`samples from the patients on intramuscular or intravenous
`treatment before subcutaneous therapy were collected as
`preinfusion samples. The reported systemic reactions were
`classified in one of the following four groups: mild, moderate,
`
`365
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 5
`
`

`

`THE LANCET
`
`Number of
`patients
`
`Immunoglobulin preparations
`
`mg/kg month
`mean (min-max)
`
`Infusion rate (mL/h/
`syringe driver)
`
`mL/infusion
`site (max)
`
`Infusion Interval
`
`400* (210-730)
`
`20t
`
`10 (18)
`
`Once per week
`
`Gammaglobulin Kabi, Pharmacia,
`Sweden 165 mg/mL or
`Gammabulin, Immuno, Austria
`160 mg/mL
`Gammaglobulin Kabi, Pharmacia,
`Sweden 165 mg/mL
`Nordimmun, Novo Nordisk, Denmark
`150 mg/mL
`Gammaglobulin Kabi, Pharmacia,
`Sweden, 165 mg/mL
`*A dose of 400 mg/kg/month was given to the majority of the patients (54/59, 92%). tTwo syringe-drivers were used simultaneously during hospital practice (=40 mL/h). tFaur
`syringe-drivers were used simultaneously during hospital practice (=80 mL/h).
`Table 1: Patients and data about immunoglobulin preparations and the subcutaneous therapy
`
`Stockholm, Sweden
`
`59
`
`Gothenberg, Sweden
`
`Copenhagen, Denmark
`
`Oslo, Norway
`
`40
`
`20
`
`46
`
`325 (80-800)
`
`465(310-765)
`
`220 (140-480)
`
`214
`
`4-8
`
`5
`
`10
`
`20
`
`Once per week or once
`every two weeks
`1-4 times per week
`
`20 (40)
`
`1-3 times per week
`
`severe, or anaphylactoid reactions. We classified symptoms such
`as headache, dizziness, cold sweats, nausea, fatigue, and myalgias
`as mild reactions. Moderate and severe reactions included
`wheezing, dyspnoea, chest pain, flushing, tachycardia,
`abdominal, and/or back pain, diarrhoea, and chills. If these
`reactions required treatment (adrenaline, hydrocortisone, etc),
`they were classified as severe, otherwise as moderate. Mental
`confusion and clouding of consciousness were also classified as
`severe reactions. Table 1 shows the routes and immunoglobulin
`preparations employed.
`All the infusions were given in the abdominal wall, thigh
`and/or buttocks (the latter used only in Gothenburg) by using
`portable syringe drivers (MS16A, Graseby Medical, UK)
`combined with infusion sets with 0.3-0-6 mm butterfly needles.
`All patients in Stockholm, Copenhagen, Oslo, and 1 patient in
`Gothenburg self infused the immunoglobulin at home (n=125).
`The remaining patients in Gothenburg received their infusions in
`the hospital's out-patient clinic.
`
`Questionnaire
`23 questions (out of 38) in the questionnaire concerned patients'
`perceptions of tissue reactions at the infusion sites. The patient
`answered yes or no to questions about occurrence of tissue
`reactions and also visual analogue scales about intensity, 1 local
`reaction is not troublesome, 100 local reaction is very
`troublesome.
`
`Cost
`The cost of the replacement therapy to the Swedish health-care
`system included: immunoglobulin preparations, materials,
`personnel, rooms, and administrative overheads. We used the
`data to compare the costs of five available, alternative-therapy
`regimens: hospital treatment with intramuscular injections;
`intravenous or subcutaneous infusions; and home therapy with
`intravenous or subcutaneous infusions. A WHO-suggested
`monthly immunoglobulin dose of 400 mg per kilogram was used
`in the costing. We compared the costs by calculating them in US
`dollars at 1993 prices (7.80 Swedish kronor to 1 US dollar).
`
`Statistical analysis
`We used non-parametric and parametric statistical methods. The
`differences between two groups were tested by the Mann-
`
`Whitney U-test or by Student's t-test. The differences between
`several groups were tested by the Kruskal—Wallis, one-way
`analysis of variance or by ANOVA (with a 95% CI). The
`relations between variables were expressed by Spearman rank-
`order-correlation coefficients or Pearson's product-moment-
`correlation coefficients. Nominal data were treated by the x' test.
`Statistical significance was accepted if p<0•05.
`
`Ethics
`The study was approved by the local ethics committee at each
`participating hospital and, in Stockholm, also by the ethics
`committee at the Karolinska Institute. Informed consent was
`obtained from the patients or from their parents.
`
`Results
`Duration of subcutaneous IgG-replacement therapy
`ranged from 5 months to 9 years 8 months (median 3
`years). 33 168 infusions, of which 27 030 at home, were
`administered (table 2). 106 adverse systemic reactions
`were reported in 28 patients (17%). 100 were mild and
`the remaining 6 moderate. There were no severe or
`anaphylactoid reactions. 16 of the 106 reported mild or
`moderate reactions occurred at home. Table 2 shows that
`a low total frequency of reactions were reported from
`Copenhagen and Oslo; this was because if mild reactions
`occurred, they were not recorded at these two centres.
`There was no difference in the reported frequency of
`adverse systemic reactions between the patients with
`CVID or XLA compared with patients with IgG-subclass
`deficiencies, or between men and women.
`Of the 126 patients who previously had intramuscular
`injections and/or intravenous infusions, 48 had
`experienced 678 adverse systemic reactions. In the years
`before subcutanous therapy, 9554 intramuscular
`injections had been given to the patients of which 486
`(5%) resulted in an adverse reaction. These reactions
`consisted of 430 mild, 25 moderate, 16 severe, and 15
`anaphylactoid reactions. During 1416 intravenous
`infusions, 192 (14%) reactions (146 mild, 46 moderate)
`were reported. Of the 48 patients with adverse reactions
`
`Hospital-based therapy and home therapy
`
`Number of
`infusions
`
`Number and types of
`reactions (patients)
`
`During home therapy
`
`Total number of
`reactions (%) (patients)
`
`Number of
`infusions
`
`Number and types of
`reactions (patients)
`
`Total number of
`reactions (%) (patients)
`
`Stockholm
`Gothenburg
`Copenhagent
`Oslot
`
`Total
`
`8836
`4353
`8619
`11 360
`
`33 168
`
`Mild
`
`57 (n=17)
`43 (n=7)
`
`Moderate*
`
`3 (n=3)
`2 (n=2)
`1 (n=1)
`0
`
`100 (n=24)
`
`6 (n=6)
`
`60 (0.7) (n=20)
`45 (1.0) (n=7)
`1 (n=1)
`0
`
`106 $ (n=28)
`
`7674
`370
`8534
`10 452
`
`27 030
`
`Mild
`
`Moderate*
`
`14 (n=3)
`0
`
`1 (n=1)
`0
`1. (n=1)
`0
`
`14 (n=3)
`
`2 (n=2)
`
`15 (n=4)
`0
`1 (n=1)
`0
`
`16 (n=5)
`
`*No severe or anaphylctoid reactions occurred during the subcutaneous infusions. 1-At these two centres, mild reactions were not recorded. $The prevalence of systemic adverse
`reactions was estimated as 0.8% (Stockholm, Gothenburg).
`Table 2: Frequency and types of adverse systemic reactions during subcutaneous Immunoglobulin replacement therapy
`
`366
`
`Vol 345 • February 11, 1995
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 6
`
`

`

`Symptom
`
`Score intervals"
`
`Median
`
`1-25
`Grade I
`
`26-50
`Grade II
`
`51-75
`Grade III
`
`76-100
`Grade IV
`
`Swelling (n=123)
`Soreness (n=106)
`Redness (n=81)
`Induration (n=77)
`
`70 (57%)
`44 (42%)
`67 (83%)
`45 (58%)
`
`26 (21%)
`28 (26%)
`4 (5%)
`16 (21%)
`
`19
`29
`5
`15
`*VAS score 1=local reaction not troublesome, 100=local reaction very troublesome.
`Table 3: The four commonly reported, transient, local tissue
`reactions reported
`
`20 (16%)
`20 (19%)
`8 (10%)
`9 (12%)
`
`7 (6%)
`14 (13%)
`2 (2%)
`7 (9%)
`
`during intramuscular and/or intravenous therapy, 35 did
`not have any reactions when they used the subcutaneous
`route and the 13 others had only mild reactions.
`18 patients had acquired chronic hepatitis C from
`contaminated batches of intravenous gammaglobulin
`products before subcutaneous therapy and one patient
`had hepatitis B from intravenous drug abuse. The
`remaining 146 patients (28 480 infusions, 434 patient
`years) were followed-up for signs of hepatitis virus
`transmission during subcutaneous therapy. The
`investigations included tests for AST, ALT, alkaline
`phosphatase and total bilirubin every 3-6 months. In spite
`of large doses IgG, no signs indicated the transmission
`of hepatitis virus by intramuscular products given
`subcutaneously.
`
`Local tissue reactions
`The responSes to the questionnaire in 152 patients,
`revealed that 87% of the patients had experienced some
`form of tissue reaction in the infusion sites at least once.
`The number of patients reporting local reactions were for
`swelling 123, soreness 106, redness 81, induration 77,
`local heat 56, itching 34, bruising 24, and rash 8. These
`tissues reactions were reported to occur sporadically and
`to be transient. Most patients did not perceive them to be
`troublesome (table 3). There were no skin infections or
`abscesses.
`The perception of inconvenience caused by local
`reactions such as swelling (p<0.05), soreness (p<0.05),
`and induration (p<0.05) were inversely correlated with
`their body mass index (BMI),2 thus the lower the BMI,
`the more pronounced the perception of symptoms. When
`comparing patients who received slow (Copenhagen and
`Oslo) versus rapid (Stockholm and Gothenburg)
`infusions, there were no differences between the two with
`the exception of itching (p<0.05); the patients on rapid
`infusion thought this symptom was more pronounced.
`
`Patients ending the therapy
`After six years, 1 female patient in Copenhagen stopped
`having the subcutaneous infusions when she refused any
`form of replacement treatment. In Gothenburg,
`subcutaneous therapy was stopped because of local tissue
`reactions which gave pronounced erythema, itching, and
`soreness in two female patients after 95 and 173
`infusions, respectively.
`
`Serum IgG and IgG-subclasses
`Table 4 shows that in individuals with CVID or XLA who
`had not previously received immunoglobulins, mean
`serum IgG levels increased.
`In subjects who were treated with intramuscular
`injections immediately before subcutaneous therapy,
`mean IgG concentration increased from 3.0 to 6.2 g/L
`(p<0.001, paired Student's t-test) after 6 months of
`
`Vol 345 • February 11, 1995
`
`THE LANCET
`
`IgG concentration
`(g/L)
`
`Stockholm*
`
`Copenhagen*
`
`Oslo*
`
`Total
`
`0
`
`6
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36 months
`
`2.1
`8.2
`0.4-4.2) 6.0-11-0
`(n=8)
`(n=8)
`0.5
`5.9
`0-1.6
`2.3-9.2
`(n=8)
`(n=6)
`2.5
`5.0
`0-1-4.7
`2-5-7.8
`(n=8)
`(n=8)
`1.7
`6.4
`0-4.7
`2-3-11.0
`(n=24)
`(n=22)
`
`10.1
`7-9-14.7
`(n=8)
`4.9
`2.3-8.7
`(n=5)
`5.9
`
`(n=5)
`7.5
`2.3-14.7
`(n=18)
`
`10.9
`7.5-14.0
`(n=8)
`5.6
`
`(n=5)
`6.4
`4.5-8.3
`(n=4)
`8.3
`3.8-14.0
`(n=17)
`
`9.9
`6.9-12-7
`(n=7)
`6.7
`5-3-8.9
`(n=6)
`
`8.4
`5.3-12-7
`(n=13)
`
`Data are given as mean, range, and number of patients. Normal range for IgG (adults):
`7-15 g/L. *Gothenburg excluded as they had no unsubstituted CVID/XLA subjects.
`Table 4: Serum IgG levels (g/L) before and during 36 months of
`subcutaneous gammaglobulin therapy in previously
`unsubstituted CVID/XLA subjects
`
`Yearly cost*
`
`Percent of cost related to IgG
`preparations
`
`Hospital•based therapy
`Intramuscular injections
`Intravenous infusions
`Subcutaneous infusions
`
`Home therapy
`Intramuscular injections
`Subcutaneous infusions
`
`3204
`14 124
`4656
`
`13 224
`3096
`
`75%
`93%
`51%
`
`99%
`78%
`
`*Cost per year in $US at 1993 prices, and as the percentage of the cost that relates
`to the immunoglobulin preparations.
`The calculations are based on an immunoglobulin dose of 400 mg/kg/month. The less
`costly products registered in Sweden have been used in the calculations.
`Table 5: The yearly costs of five alternative strategies of IgG
`replacement therapy
`
`subcutaneous therapy (46). In subjects treated with
`intravenous infusions before subcutaneous therapy, mean
`IgG concentration increased from 4.9 to 7.3 g/L
`(p<0.001, paired Student's t-test) after 6 months (27). In
`all patients with CVID or XLA, a significant correlation
`was found between the monthly immunoglobulin doses
`given and serum IgG concentrations reached (p<0.001)
`after 6 months on the subcutaneous therapy.
`In patients with IgG subclass deficiencies not previously
`treated the mean subclass concentrations increased during
`the first 6 months: with IgG1 deficiency the mean IgG1
`concentration increased from 31 to 5.5 g/L; in patients
`with IgG2 deficiency, the mean IgG2 concentration
`increased from 0.6 to 44 g/L, and in patients with IgG3-
`deficiency, the mean IgG3 concentration increased from
`0.13 to 0.22 g/L.
`
`Cost of replacement therapy
`The total, yearly costs for the hospital-based
`intramuscular and subcutaneous treatments were
`approximately comparable, while the cost of the
`intravenous treatment was 3-4 times higher. Comparison
`between the two home-therapy alternatives showed that
`the total, yearly cost of the subcutaneous therapy was
`approximately $3100 compared with $13 200 for the
`intravenous therapy (table 5). The costs for the
`immunoglobulin preparations represented most of the
`total yearly costs: intramuscular therapy 75%, intravenous
`therapy 93-99%, and subcutaneous therapy 51-78%.
`
`Discussion
`The main purpose of IgG replacement therapy is to
`reduce the frequency and severity of infections. The
`development of immunoglobulins which have a low risk of
`
`367
`
`Ex. 1095 - Page 7
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`THE LANCET
`
`virus transmission and cause as few adverse systemic
`reactions as possible is important. Likewise, the
`administration should have a minimal, negative impact on
`patients' daily lives. Home therapy has been shown to be
`convenient for the patients, as it is time-saving, reduces
`the time lost from work or school and increases
`independence.'-6,8,1708 The use of the subcutaneous
`administration route has been reported from several
`countries.6-12, 14-16,19,20
`In our study, there were only 106 adverse systemic
`reactions with more than 33 000 subcutaneous IgG
`infusions. The prevalence of undesired reactions was less
`than 1%. Most reactions (100/106) were mild, the
`remainder were classified as moderate. For comparison,
`126 of the same patients had had a total of 678 reactions
`during intramuscular or intravenous treatment. The
`prevalence of adverse reactions in connection with
`intravenous infusions was calculated as 14% and for the
`intramuscular injections as 5%. However, severe and
`anaphylactoid reactions occurred only during
`intramuscular therapy not during intravenous therapy.
`Subcutaneous therapy was in our study safely used at
`home, and used on patients who had previously
`experienced severe or even anaphylactoid reactions during
`intramuscular treatment.
`16 of the 106 reactions in our study occurred at home.
`The low number of reactions reported during home
`therapy may be explained in two ways: more reactions
`might occur during the initial, hospital-based phase of the
`therapy, when the patients still have a higher frequency of
`infections leading to the formation of antigen-antibody
`complexes;" or the patients may be less inclined to report
`mild reactions when they have home therapy. However,
`we believe that moderate or severe reactions will be
`reported by patients.
`The most common transient local tissue reactions at
`the infusion sites were swelling, soreness, redness,
`induration, local heat, and itching. Less subcutaneous
`tissue seems to increase the inconvenience of these local
`reactions. The difference between the intensity of itching
`and the infusion rate (slow vs rapid) may be due to
`mechanical and/or chemical local mechanisms afflicting
`superficial, dermal sensory nerve fibres.22
`Unfortunately, mild adverse systemic reactions were
`not routinely recorded at the two clinics where slow
`infusions were practised. It was therefore not possible to
`investigate whether rapid infusions

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket