throbber
WI CL71.51,3
`V.I0 (cid:9)
`NO.S (cid:9)
`103
`C.01 -------- SEO: lAW0d9772
`TI: lilo0PUGS
`
`11/ 19/ 98
`
`TM
`
`Clinical Immunotherapeutics, Biopharmaceuticals and Gene Therapy
`
`November 1998, Vol. 10, No. 5 (pp. 341-422)
`ISSN: 1173-8804
`
`Adis Drug Evaluation
`Infliximab
`
`Leading Article
`Immunology of CpG DNA
`
`Disease Management
`Pancreas ransplantation for Diabetes Mellitus
`
`Review Articles
`Effects of MMF on Clinical Transplantation
`Emerging Pharmacotherapy for Pancreatitis
`
`Original Research Article
`Ribosomal Immunotherapy of Respiratory Tract Infections
`
`MS4„ Av.=
`111.
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`1/41.711101I, OP MALT
`
`PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`A
`a s
`
`INTERNATIONAL
`
`A Wolters Kluwer Company
`
`AUCKLAND • CHESTER • HONG KONG • MADRID
`MILAN • OSAKA • PARTS -...'i.PHILADELPHIA • SYDNEY
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Vol. 10, No. 5, 1998
`
`Contents
`
`Leading Article
`
`Disease
`Management
`
`Review Articles
`
`The CpG Motif: Implications for
`Clinical Immunology
`AM Krieg
`
`Pancreas Transplantation for Diabetes Mellitus:
`A Guide to Recipient Selection and
`Optimum Immunosuppression
`RJ Stratta, RR Alloway
`
`341-346
`
`347-357
`
`Acute Pancreatitis: An Overview of
`Emerging Pharmacotherapy
`K Sargen, AN Kingsnorth
`Mycophenolate Mofetil: Effects on
`Clinical Transplantation
`CD Holt, TM Sievers, RM Ghobrial,
`SJ Rossi, IA Goss, SV McDiarmid
`
`Immunological Disorders 359-371
`
`Immunology-Based 373-384
`Agents
`
`Original Research
`Article
`
`Economic Evaluation of Ribosomal
`Immunotherapy in Patients with Chronic Ear,
`Nose and Throat and Respiratory Tract Infections:
`Results for Italy
`K Banz, AM Thomas, D Olivieri
`
`Adis Drug
`Evaluation
`
`Infliximab: A Review of its Use in Crohn's Disease
`and Rheumatoid Arthritis
`SV Onrust, HM Lamb
`
`385-396
`
`397-422
`
`BioDrugs is indexed in Chemical Abstracts, EMBASE/Exceruta Medial, Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Science Citation Index''',
`SciSearcO, Research Alert and the Medical Documentation Serviceml. Indexing by all other major biomedical databases has been applied
`for. Individual articles are available through the ADONIS document delivery system and are available on-line via the World Wide
`Web through BioMedNet. Further details are available from the publisher.
`Copyright: The appearance of the code at the top of the first page of an article in this journal indicates the copyright owner's
`consent that copies of the article may be made for the personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the
`condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive,
`Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, USA, for copying beyond that permitted by sections 107 or 108 of the US Copyright Law. This
`consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes,
`for creating new collective works, or for resale.
`
`This m ata ri a I was, gar.
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 2
`
`

`

`Adis
`
`INTERNATIONAL
`
`A Walters Kluwer Company
`
`International Editorial Board
`
`J.A. Anderson, Detroit, MI, USA
`L. Bergmann, Ulm, Germany
`J. Bousquet, Montpellier, France
`J. Brostoff, London, England
`E. De Clercq, Leuven, Belgium
`G.D. Demetri, Boston, MA, USA
`R.D. deShazo, Jackson, MS, USA
`R. Feld, Toronto, ONT, Canada
`C.J. Fisher Jr, Cleveland, OH, LISA
`T.R. Flotte, Gainesville, FL, USA
`0. Form, Oslo, Norway
`A. Ganser, Hannover, Germany
`F. Guilhot, Poitiers, France
`J.W. Hadden, Tampa, FL, USA
`B.D. Kahan, Houston, TX, USA
`H. Krels, Paris, France
`S.L. Lightman, London, England
`R.F. Luckey, Tampa, FL, USA
`Marder, Rochester, NY, USA
`Merigan Jr, Stanford, CA, LISA
`W.J. Metzger, Greenville, NC, USA
`Y. Mizushima, Hirosaki, Japan
`H.W. Murray, New York, NY, USA
`J,L.Murray, Houston, TX, USA
`C. Picado, Barcelona, Spain
`A.J. Pinching, London, England
`T, A.E. Platts-Mills, Charlottesville, VA, USA
`C. Ponticelli, Milan, Italy
`A.L. Sheffer, Boston, MA, USA
`C.A. Stein, New York, NY, USA
`A.-M. Svennerholm, Gothenburg, Sweden
`J.W.M. van der Meer, Nijmegen,
`The Netherlands
`S.A. Watson, Nottingham, England
`R.S. Weening, Amsterdam,
`The Netherlands
`D.A. Willoughby, London, England
`
`TM
`
`Aim and Scope: The aim of the journal is to provide healthcare decision
`makers with a regular programme of peer reviewed articles covering
`issues in the clinical application of immunological and biotechnological
`knowledge to the treatment of human disease. The journal publishes
`definitive reviews on a broad range of topics in clinical immunology,
`biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, including the treatment of disor-
`ders with an immunological component and the development and opti-
`mum therapeutic use of agents based on immunological and biotechno-
`logical principles. Original research articles on the human clinical
`pharmacology, clinical development and therapeutic optimisation of rel-
`evant drugs are also included. Letters to the editor are welcomed and will
`be considered for publication.
`
`Publication Manager: Kate MacDonald
`Commissioning Editor: Antona J. Wagstaff
`
`Editorial Office and Inquiries: Adis International Limited, 41 Centorian
`Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland 10, New Zealand
`(e-mail: biodnigs@adis.co.nz). Information on the preparation of manuscripts
`will be provided to authors.
`
`http://www.adis.com
`
`Executive Vice-President, Japan: Christopher J. Mellor
`Executive Vice-President, Europe: Philip R. Smith
`Executive Vice-President, USA: Kevin F. 'Emile
`
`BioDrugs (ISSN 1173-8804) is published monthly by Adis International Ltd,
`41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland 10, New
`Zealand. Annual subscription price: North & South America $US895;
`Europe SwF1355; Japan Y134 550; rest of world $US895. Subscription
`orders must be pre-paid. All subscriptions for Europe must be paid in
`Swiss francs; the US dollar rate is not applicable in Europe. (Further
`subscription information is given in the General Information page at the
`back of each issue as space permits.) Printed in Hong Kong by Sun Light
`Printing & Bookbinding Factory
`
`Exclusive subscription agent in Japan: Technomics Inc., CPO Box 882, Tokyo
`100-91, Japan.
`
`Copyright: © 1998 Adis International Ltd. All rights reserved throughout
`the world and in all languages. No part of this publication may be
`reproduced, transmitted or stored in any form or by any means either
`mechanical or electronic, including photocopying, recording, or through
`an information storage and retrieval system, without the written permis-
`sion of the copyright holder.
`Although great care has been taken in compiling the content of this
`publication, the publisher and its servants are not responsible or in any
`way liable for the currency of the information, for any errors, omissions
`or inaccuracies, or for any consequences arising therefrom. Inclusion or
`exclusion of any product does not imply its use is either advocated or
`rejected. Use of trade names is for product identification only and does
`not imply endorsement. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the
`views of the Publisher, Editor or Editorial Board.
`
`vr9: Died
`Ti= (cid:9)
`a: 7^ NP,1Eni Tavbe
`Subj, 77 7_17- (cid:9)
`t Laws
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 3
`
`

`

`ADIS DRUG EVALUATION
`
`8IoDrugs 1998 Nov; 10 (5): 397-422
`1173-8804/98/0011-0397/$13.00/0
`
`Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`Infliximab
`A Review of its Use in Crohn's Disease and
`Rheumatoid Arthritis
`
`Susan V Onrust and Harriet M. Lamb
`Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand
`
`Various sections of the manuscript reviewed by:
`E. Choy, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King's College, London, England; A. Eigler,
`Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Innestadt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich, Germany; S.
`Endres, Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Innestadt der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Munich, Germany;
`B.I. Korelitz, Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA; D.E. Levy,
`Department of Pathology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; R. Maini,
`Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London, England; R. Modigliani, Service d'Hepato Gastro-Enterologie,
`Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; H.E. Paulus, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine,
`University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; M.Robinson, Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive
`Research, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; S. van Deventer,
`Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; J. Vilcek, Department of Microbiology, New
`York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
`
`Data Selection
`Sources: Medical literature published in any language since 1966 on infliximab, identified using AdisBase (a proprietary database of Adis
`International, Auckland, New Zealand), Medline and EMBASE. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published
`articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from the company developing the drug.
`Search strategy: AdisBase search terms were 'infliximab', 'centnf', 'ca2', 'anti-tnf-alpha', 'monoclonal', 'chimeric', 'antibody', 'Crohn's
`disease', 'ulcerative colitis' and 'rheumatoid arthritis'. Medline and EMBASE search terms were 'infliximab', 'centnf', 'anti-tnf', 'monoclonal',
`'antibody', 'anti-tnf-alpha', 'rheumatoid arthritis', 'inflammatory bowel diseases' and 'colitis'. Searches were last updated 14 October 1998.
`Selection: Studies in patients with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis who received infliximab. Inclusion of studies was based mainly
`on the methods section of the trials. Relevant pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data are also included.
`Index terms: Infliximab, tumour necrosis factor-a, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic
`use, tolerability.
`
`Contents
`
`Summary
`1. Introduction (cid:9)
`2. Pharmacodynamic Properties (cid:9)
`2.1 (cid:9) Mechanism of Action
`2.1.1 Effects on TNFa-Regulated Factors (cid:9)
`2.1.2 Effects on Leucocyte Recruitment (cid:9)
`2.1.3 Effects on Peripheral Leucocytes (cid:9)
`2.2 Immunoglobulin Responses (cid:9)
`2.2.1 Anti-Inflixlmab Antibodies
`2,2.2 Antl-Double-Stranded DNA Antibodies (cid:9)
`3. Pharmacokinetic Properties
`4. Clinical Use in Crohn's Disease (cid:9)
`4.1 Single Infusions
`
`This mete. a I
`ettka. L'
`
`z : "pied
`Ey he
`
` 398
` 400
` 401
` 401
` 401
` 404
` 404
` 405
` 405
` 406
` 407
` 408
` 408
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 4
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`398
`
`Onntst & Lamb
`
`5.
`
`4.1.1 Clinical Response Rate (cid:9)
`4.1.2 Onset and Duration of Response (cid:9)
`4,2 Multiple Infusions (cid:9)
`4.3 Effects on Fistulae (cid:9)
`Clinical Potential in Rheumatoid Arthritis
`
`5.1 single Infusions
`5.1.1 Clinical Response Rate
`5.1.2 Onset and Duration of Response (cid:9)
`
`5,2 Multiple Infusions (cid:9)
`5,3 Effect of Concurrent Methotrexate
`
`6. Tolerability (cid:9)
`
`6.1 Acute Infusion-Related Events
`6.2 Infection (cid:9)
`
`6.3 Other Events (cid:9)
`
`7, Dosage and Administration
`8. Place of Infliximab in the Management of Crohn's Disease and
`Rheumatoid Arthritis (cid:9)
`
` 408
` 410
` 410
` 411
`411
`412
`412
` 412
`412
`414
`415
`415
`415
`416
`416
`
` 417
`
`Summary
`Abstract
`
`Pharmacodynamic (cid:9)
`Properties (cid:9)
`
`Infliximab is a chimaeric monoclonal antibody which binds to and inhibits the
`activity of tumour necrosis factor-a (TNFa), a cytokine which is involved in the
`development of both Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with
`treatment-resistant Crohn's disease, infliximab was significantly more effective
`than placebo in the relief of symptoms. 50 to 89% of patients responded to in-
`fliximab and most of them also achieved remission. Patients showed signs of
`relapse 8 to 12 weeks after a single infusion but responded to additional infusions
`of the drug. Infliximab was also effective in closing the fistulae in 68% of patients
`with fistulising Crohn's disease; the response rate with placebo was 26%.
`Infliximab achieved a clinical response in 44 to 81% of patients with refractory
`rheumatoid arthritis. Following a single infusion, symptom recurrence was evi-
`dent after 6 to 12 weeks, but subsequent infusions re-established a clinical re-
`sponse. Concurrent methotrexate appeared to prolong the effects of infliximab in
`this patient group.
`Anti-infliximab and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies developed in some
`patients, particularly those who received multiple infusions of infliximab. Acute
`adverse events consistent with hypersensitivity occurred in some patients who
`received multiple infusions of infliximab. Infection occurred slightly more fre-
`quently with infliximab than with placebo.
`Conclusions: Inflixirnab appears to be an effective therapy for patients with
`treatment-resistant or fistulising Crohn's disease or refractory rheumatoid arthri-
`tis. The tolerability, long term efficacy and optimal dosage regimen need to be
`further defined in comparative trials before the full potential of infliximab is
`realised in these patients.
`Tumour necrosis factor-a (TNFa) is present at elevated levels in inflamed tissues
`and is thought to play a central role in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease and
`rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab is a mouse-human chimaeric monoclonal anti-
`body which binds to and blocks the function of human TNFa. Consistent with
`blockade of TNFa, intravenous infliximab resulted in reduced expression of
`TNFa-regulated chemokines, endothelial adhesion molecules and interleukins in
`
`,e Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. (cid:9)
`
`BioDrugs 1998 Nov: 10 (5)
`
`THE
`
`Suc,jc.c
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Infliximab: A Review (cid:9)
`
`399
`
`patients with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis. A 25 to 50% decrease in
`peripheral rnonocyte counts was observed in some patients who received in-
`fliximab, but resolved within a few weeks.
`Patients who received multiple infusions of infliximab were more likely to
`develop anti-infliximab antibodies than those who received single infusions, but
`concurrent methotrexate or higher doses of infliximab markedly reduced the anti-
`infliximab response. Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies also
`developed in patients more frequently after multiple than after single infusions
`of infliximab.
`
`Serum infliximab concentrations increased in proportion with higher doses, and
`the median volume of distribution was 3.0 L with infliximab 5 mg/kg. Eight weeks
`after patients received infusions of infliximab 1 to 20 mg/kg, serum infliximab
`was detectable only in patients who received ..1() mg/kg. Concurrent methotrex-
`ate tended to increase serum concentrations of infliximab.
`The elimination half-life of infliximab was 9 to 10 days in patients with either
`Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis. This is longer than that reported for intact
`mouse monoclonal antibodies, but shorter than that reported for native human
`antibodies.
`
`In 8- to 48-week clinical trials involving 9 to 107 patients with treatment-resistant
`Crohn's disease, infliximab 5 to 20 mg/kg achieved a clinical response [defined
`as a reduction in Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score of ?_70 points] in
`50 to 89% of patients. In the only fully reported, placebo-controlled trial, single
`infusions of infliximab 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg achieved a clinical response in 50 to
`81% of patients with Crohn's disease compared with 17% of patients with pla-
`cebo. Remission (defined as a CDAI score <150) was achieved in 27 to 50% of
`patients who received infliximab compared with 4% of patients who received
`placebo in this study. There was no dose-response pattern with infliximab 5, 10
`and 20 mg/kg, although the 1 mg/kg dose was associated with a lower clinical
`response rate.
`Patients with treatment-resistant Crohn's disease generally responded to a
`single infusion of infliximab by week 2, the earliest time-point reported, and
`exhibited maximum improvement by week 4 to 6. Disease activity started to
`return after approximately 8 to 12 weeks. A longer overall duration of response
`was achieved with multiple infusions of infliximab. To date, a maximum of 5
`infusions have been administered with an associated duration of effect of at least
`44 weeks.
`In patients with fistulising Crohn's disease, infliximab was significantly more
`effective than placebo on the basis of closure of fistulae. At least 50% of fistulae
`consecutive visits in 68% of patients who received in-
`were closed during (cid:9)
`fliximab 5 nig/kg compared with 26% of placebo recipients. In 55% of infliximab
`recipients, all fistulae were closed.
`
`In 4- to 26-week trials, single doses of infliximab 1 to 20 mg/kg achieved a clinical
`response in 44 to 81% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to (cid:9)
`dis-
`ease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), based on the Paulus 20% or
`American College of Rheumatology criteria (range 7 to 81 evaluable patients).
`In I trial, pain score, swollen joint count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were
`improved by 63, 61 and 45%, respectively, 4 weeks after patients received a single
`infusion of infliximab 10 mg/kg.
`
`Pharmacokinetic
`Properties
`
`Clinical Use in Crohn's (cid:9)
`Disease (cid:9)
`
`Clinical Potential in
`Rheumatoid Arthritis
`
`-2., Adis International Limited, All rights reserved. (cid:9)
`
`BioDrugs 1998 Nov; 10 (5)
`
`i (cid:9)
`
`: n•led
`
`Subict. (cid:9)
`
`LAYS
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 6
`
`

`

`400
`
`Ourust & Lamb
`
`Tolerability (cid:9)
`
`Dosage and (cid:9)
`Administration (cid:9)
`
`The response to infliximab was apparent 1 week after infusion and reached a
`maximum after approximately 3 weeks. The median duration of the Paulus 20%
`response after a single infusion of infliximab 10 mg/kg was 8 weeks in 1 trial.
`Patients who were re-infused with infliximab after responding to an initial infu-
`sion and subsequently relapsing continued to respond similarly. However, the
`duration of the response was reduced with each successive infusion administered
`after relapse in a noncomparative trial in 7 patients; after 1, 2, 3 or 4 infusions,
`the median response duration was 12, 9.1, 8.3 and 7.7 weeks, respectively. Con-
`current methotrexate therapy improved the duration of the response to multiple
`infusions of infliximab.
`Adverse events associated with infliximab were usually mild and resolved spon-
`taneously. Acute, infusion-related adverse events suggestive of hypersensitivity
`(urticaria, somnolence, pruritus, chills, fever, headache, facial flushing, chest
`pain, dyspnoea and/or nausea) occurred in 6 to 38% of patients who received
`multiple infusions of inflikimab and were more common in patients with anti-in-
`fliximab antibodies. Such events were not reported in recipients of a single infu-
`sion of infliximab. The incidence of infection was slightly higher in patients who
`received infliximab than in placebo recipients. Other adverse events, at least
`possibly related to treatment, included hypertension, rigors, rash, headache and
`eczema. Two patients developed symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus after
`multiple infusions of infliximab, and in 1 patient this was correlated with the
`development of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Five patients developed lympho-
`proliferative disorders after receiving infliximab, but the data did not establish a
`relationship between this adverse event and treatment.
`Infliximab is indicated for the management of moderate to severe, active Crohn's
`disease which does not respond to conventional therapies, and for fistulising
`Crohn's disease. The recommended dose in patients with treatment-resistant
`Crohn's disease is a single, 2-hour intravenous infusion of infliximab 5 mg/kg.
`In patients with fistulising Crohn's disease, intravenous infusions of infliximab
`5 mg/kg administered at 0, 2 and 6 weeks are recommended. Currently, no formal
`dosage recommendations are available for the administration of infliximab in
`patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In clinical trials in patients with refractory
`rheumatoid arthritis, the most effective doses of infliximab were 3 and 10 mg/kg,
`and clinical responses were maintained when infusions of infliximab were ad-
`ministered every 4 or 8 weeks.
`Because some infliximab recipients with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid ar-
`thritis have developed anti-dsDNA antibodies, hypersensitivity-type reactions or
`anti-infliximab antibodies, infliximab should be used with caution in patients
`with pre-existing anti-dsDNA antibody titres and in those who have previously
`received mouse or mouse-human monoclonal antibodies.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Infliximab is a chimaeric monoclonal antibody
`which binds to and blocks the function of tumour
`necrosis factor-a (TNFa).[2,3] As illustrated in fig-
`ure 1, infliximab consists of 2 tc light and 271 heavy
`immunoglobulin polypeptides linked by disulph-
`
`ide bonds.ril The variable regions of the polypep-
`tides are derived from cloned cDNAs encoding the
`heavy and light chains of a mouse monoclonal an-
`tibody which has high affinity and specificity for
`human TNFa. The constant regions are derived
`from cloned cDNAs encoding human lc light and
`yi heavy polypeptides.[ I ] The resulting chimaera
`
`4::) Adis International Limited. All rights reserved.
`
`BioDrugs 1998 Nov; 10 (5)
`
`This (cid:9)
`
`•..aa :•pied
`
`La.. A.
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 7
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`Infliximab: A Review (cid:9)
`
`401
`
`CI Mouse
`f: Human
`— Disulphide bond
`
`Fig. 1. Diagram of infliximab, a chimaeric monoclonal antibody
`composed of mouse lc light and 71 heavy chain variable regions
`(V) and human lc light and yi heavy chain constant regions (C),
`which are joined by the disulphide bonds characteristic of immuno-
`globulins.[1]
`
`has high affinity and specificity for human TNFa,
`and blocks the function of this cytokine in vitro and
`in vivo.[ I-3 I
`Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis are
`disorders with unknown aetiologies, but are prob-
`ably autoimmune in origin. They involve chronic
`inflammation of, respectively, the gastrointestinal
`tract (usually the colon and/or distal ileum) and
`multiple synovial joints.14,5I The course of both dis-
`eases is unpredictable, is usually progressive and
`may be interrupted by periods of remission.I4,5I
`Use of intravenously administered infliximab in
`the treatment of Crohn's disease and rheumatoid
`arthritis is evaluated in this review.
`
`2. Pharmacodynamic Properties
`
`Although extensive in vitro and in vivo data are
`available on infliximab, only in vivo studies of the
`effects of infliximab in patients with Crohn's dis-
`ease or rheumatoid arthritis are discussed in this
`section.
`
`2,1 Mechanism of Action
`
`Cytokines are central mediators of the localised
`inflammatory processes in both Crohn's disease
`
`and rheumatoid arthritis.[6,7] In particular, TNFa,
`the target for infliximab, is present at elevated lev-
`els in inflamed tissues and plays regulatory and
`proinflammatory roles in both diseases.[6:7I
`As outlined in figure 2, TNFa induces the ex-
`pression of chemokines, endothelial adhesion mol-
`ecules and other cytokines. As a group, these
`TNFa-induced factors promote the recruitment of
`leucocytes to inflammatory sites, leucocyte activa-
`tion and the production of acute phase pro-
`13,141
`teinsi (cid:9)
`TNFa also stimulates bone resorption
`by osteoclasts, contributing directly to bone ero-
`sion in the joints in rheumatoid arthritis,191 and the
`proliferation of fibroblasts and intestinal smooth
`muscle cells associated with intestinal fibrosis in
`Crohn's disease.112I
`Inhibition of the functions of TNFa is thought
`to be the primary mechanism of action of in-
`fliximab.I7,17I Through the complement cascade
`and/or antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotox-
`icity, infliximab may also be cytotoxic to cells
`which express membrane-bound TNFa, such as T
`and B lymphocytes and monocytes. These cell
`types are present in the inflammatory lesions in
`Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis.I3,18I
`
`2.1.1 Effects on TNFa-Regulated Factors
`As summarised in table I, infliximab decreased
`the levels of many TNFa-regulated chemokines,
`endothelial adhesion molecules and cytokines in
`biopsies of inflamed tissues and sera from patients
`with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthritis at
`time-points ranging from 1 day to 8 weeks after
`administration of infliximab. Biopsy examination
`is preferred because serum levels may not reflect
`short term changes in factor production at the rel-
`evant inflammatory sites.[I
`Reductions in factor levels were generally cor-
`related with clinical response to infliximab in pa-
`tients with Crohn's disease or rheumatoid arthri-
`19-21,23-25,27,28]
`tis.I (cid:9)
`Where it was administered,
`placebo had no effect on the levels of these factors
`in these patients.[20-24] A dose-response effect was
`apparent in 2 studies; the reductions in serum inter-
`cellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), E-
`selectin and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in patients
`
`Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. (cid:9)
`
`BloDrugs 1998 Nov: 10 (5)
`
`Tbi,z mat i (cid:9)
`
`vied
`
`Su:S.E
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 8
`
`

`

`402 (cid:9)
`
`Onrust & Lamb
`
`with rheumatoid arthritis were more marked with
`the 10 than the 1 mg/kg dose of infliximab.['-1,24]
`Infliximab reduced the levels of chemokines in
`biopsies from patients with Crohn's disease [mono-
`cyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), macro-
`phage inhibitory protein-2 (MIP-2) and regulated
`upon activation, normal T cell expressed and se-
`creted (RANTES)11191 and rheumatoid arthritis (IL-
`8 and MCP-1; table 0.1261 However, the levels of
`
`growth-related peptide-a (Groa) and RANTES
`were unchanged in biopsies from patients with
`rheumatoid arthritis who received infliximab.1261
`With infliximab, endothelial adhesion molecule
`levels were reduced in biopsies from patients with
`Crohn's disease (ICAM-1)1221 and rheumatoid ar-
`thritis [E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion mol-
`ecule-1 (VCAM-1)].[201 Production of the cyto-
`kines interferon-y (IFNy) and TNFa in biopsies
`
`TNFa
`(macrophages)
`
`Endothelial
`adhesion molecules
`E-selectin
`ICAM-1
`VCAM-1
`
`(endothelial cells) (cid:9)
`
`Chemokines
`Groa MIP-2
`IL-8 RANTES
`MCP-1
`
`(macrophages,
`endothelial cells, (cid:9)
`gut epithelial cells) (cid:9)
`
`Cytokines
`IFNy
`IL-113
`IL-6
`TNFa
`
`(macrophages, T
`cells, fibroblasts)
`
`Leucocyte recruitment
`
`indicates sites of inhibitory
`; action of infliximab
`
`Leucocyte
`activation
`
`Acute phase
`proteins
`
`(hepatocytes)
`
`Bone
`resorption
`(osteoblasts)
`
`Proliferation
`(fibroblasts,
`smooth
`muscle cells)
`
`•
`Chronic inflammation
`CD: gut
`RA: synovial joints
`
`Tissue damage
`CD: fibrosis
`RA: cartilage/bone erosion
`
`Fig. 2. Proinflammatory actions of TNFa in Crohn's disease (CD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). TNFot induces expression of cytokines,
`chemokines and endothelial adhesion molecules. These factors function in leucocyte activation and recruitment, making major
`contributions to chronic inflammation of the intestine in CD and synovial joints in IRA. These inflammatory processes, along with
`TNFa-induced bone resorption in RA and proliferation of fibroblasts and intestinal smooth muscle cells in CD, contribute to the local
`tissue damage associated with these diseases. The cell types which are most prominently involved in the above actions of TNFa are
`shown in parentheses.i7-16I Groa = growth-related gene product-a; ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IFNy = interferon-t;
`IL = interleukin; MCP-1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MIP-2 = macrophage inflammatory protein-2; RANTES = regulated
`upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; TNFa = tumour necrosis factor-a; VCAM-1 = vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.
`
`Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. (cid:9)
`
`BioDrugs 1998 Nov; 10 (5)
`
`owied
`Thi: s:e•ia I (cid:9)
`a.rad nia,be
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 9
`
`

`

`Infliximab: A Review (cid:9)
`
`403
`
`Table I. Effects of infliximab (INF) on the levels of TNFcx-induced factors in biopsies of inflamed tissues or sera taken from patients with
`Crohn's disease (CD) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In each study, patients received a single infusion of INF 1, 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg (dose was
`not specified in 2 studies).[17.191 Some studies were placebo-controlled; placebo did not reduce factor levels.12°-241 Most studies included X15
`patients, but 2 were larger and included 68121] and 1081231 patients, respectively. Five of the 9 studies referred to below were published as
`abstracts[19,22,23,25.261
`
`Factor (cid:9)
`
`Disease Effect of INF on
`factor levela
`biopsy (cid:9)
`serum
`
`Correlation
`with clinical
`response
`
`Comments
`
`Reference
`
`Chemokines
`Groa
`RA
`IL-8
`RA
`MCP-1
`CD
`RA
`MIP-2
`CD
`RANTES CD
`RA
`
`<-> vs bit
`11 vs bl
`.I. vs bl
`11 vs bl
`,I. vs bl
`1 vs bl
`<-> vs bit
`
`NR
`NR
`Yes
`NR
`Yes
`Yes
`NR
`
`Evaluation was at week 2
`
`Levels were reduced 64% from baseline at week 2
`Evaluation was at week 4
`
`Levels were reduced 45% from baseline at week 2
`Evaluation was at week 4
`Evaluation was at week 4
`Evaluation was at week 2
`
`Endothelial adhesion molecules
`E-selectin RA
`.11 vs bl (cid:9)
`11 vs PL Yes
`
`ICAM-1
`
`CD
`
`,l, vs PL (cid:9)
`
`11 vs PL Yes
`
`RA
`
`14 vs PL Yes
`
`VCAM-1 RA
`
`11 vs bl (cid:9)
`
`<-> vs PL Yesb
`
`CD
`
`1 vs bl
`
`Yes
`
`Cytokines
`IFNy (cid:9)
`
`IL-10
`
`IL-6
`
`RA
`
`CD
`CD
`
`RA
`
`11 vs PL Yes
`
`<-> vs PL No
`1 vs bl
`Yes
`
`11 vs PL
`or bl
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`TNFU
`
`CD
`
`1 vs bl
`
`RA
`
`T vs bl
`
`NR
`
`Levels in biopsies were reduced 60% from baseline at week
`4.120] In sera, levels were reduced -30% from baseline with INF
`10 mg/kg and -8% with INF 1 mg/kg at weeks 2 and 4[211
`Biopsies were evaluated at week 4.122] In sera, levels were
`reduced -5 to 10% from baseline at weeks 2 and 41231
`Levels were reduced 25 or 35% from baseline with INF 10
`mg/kg and 16 or 6% with INF 1 mg/kg at weeks 2 or 4,
`respectively1211
`In biopsies, levels were reduced 36% from baseline at week
`4.1201 Sera were evaluated at weeks 2 and 4121)
`
`At weeks 4 and 8, <0.1% of biopsy-derived mononuclear cells
`produced IFNy compared with 2.2% at baseline
`
`Levels were reduced -50 to 70% from baseline with either INF 1
`or 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 7
`
`Evaluations were at weeks 2 and 4
`Levels were reduced -50% from baseline at weeks 2, 4 and 6,
`and -30% at week 8
`Levels were reduced -75 to 90% from baseline with INF 1 or 10
`mg/kg on days 1 and 71241
`At weeks 4 or 8, 2 to 3% of biopsy-derived mononuclear cells
`produced TNFa compared with 5% at baseline
`Levels of -100 ng/L were detected by ELISA but not by bioassy
`24 hours after patients received INF. At baseline, TNFa was
`typically undetectable by ELISA or bioassay
`
`26
`26
`19
`26
`19
`19
`26
`
`20,21
`
`22,23
`
`21,24
`
`20,21
`
`27
`
`24
`
`23
`25
`
`24,28
`
`27
`
`17
`
`a (cid:9) Biopsies were assayed by immunohistochemistry[19,20,22,261 or in vitro culture of biopsy-derived mononuclear cells with subsequent
`measurement of factor levels in culture medium by specific ELISAs.1271 Sera were assayed by factor-specific ELISAs[21,23,25,28] or an
`unstated method.1241
`b (cid:9) Based on results in biopsy specimens.
`
`bl = baseline; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Groa = growth-related gene product-a; ICAM-1 = intercellular adhesion
`molecule-1; IFNy = interferon-y, IL = interleukin; MCP-1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MIP-2 = macrophage inflammatory protein-2;
`NR = not reported; PL = placebo; RANTES = regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; TNFc = tumour necrosis
`factor-a; VCAM-1 = vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; 11 indicates significantly reduced level (p < 0.05); 1 indicates reduced level, no
`statistics reported; T indicates increased level, no statistices reported; <-> indicates no change in level; indicates no statistics were reported.
`
`Adis International Limited. All rights reserved. (cid:9)
`
`BloDrugs 1998 Nov: 10 (5)
`
`This matsrial. 3i
`at the NC.f E` rr :3
`Subject US Cap ,ri=ot Laws
`
`Ex. 1090 - Page 10
`
`

`

`404
`
`Onrust & Lamb
`
`was also reduced by infliximab in 1 study:1271 when
`mononuclear cells isolated from biopsies obtained
`from 4 patients with Crohn's disease who had re-
`sponded to infliximab were cultured in vitro, these
`cells produced markedly reduced levels of IFNy
`and TNFa when compared with baseline. Such a
`reduction in IFNy and TNFa production was not
`observed in 1 patient who received infliximab but
`did not achieve a clinical response.1271
`The effects of infliximab on the levels of e

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket