throbber
411' (cid:9)
`188
`
`133 70 Ur'.
`
`A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO CLINICAL AND BASIC STUDIES OF THE DIGESTIVE TRACT AND LIVER
`
`ALIMENTARY TRACT
`903 Healing and Relapse of Severe Peptic Esophagitis After
`Treatment With Omeprazole
`DJ, HETZEL, J. DENT, W.D. REED, F.M. NARIELVALA,
`M. MACKINNON, J.H. MCCAW' HY, B. MI'T'CHELL,
`B.R. BEVERIDGE, B.H. LAURENCE, G.G. GIBSON, A.K. GRANT,
`D.J.C. SHEARMAN, R. WHITEHEAD, AND P.J. BUCKLE
`913 Effect of Terbutaline, a /32-Adrenoreceptor Agonist, on
`Gastric Acid Secretion and Serum Gastrin Concentra-
`tions in Humans
`R.C. THIRLBY, C.T. RICHARDSON, P, CHEW, AND M. FELDMAN
`920 Soy Protein Meals Stimulate Less Gastric Acid Secretion.
`and Gastrin. Release Than Beef Meals
`K.E. MCARTHUR, J.H. WALSH, AND C.T. RICHARDSON
`927 Opposite Effects of ic-Opioid Agonists on Gastric Empty-
`ing of Liquids and Solids in Dogs
`M. CUE, J. FIORAMONTI, C. HONDE, X. PASCAUD, J.L. JuNtEN,
`AND L. BUENO
`932 Indomethecin-Induced Gastric Antral Ulcers in Hamsters
`K.P. KOLBASA, C. LANCASTER, A.S. OLAFSSON,
`S.K. GILBERTSON, AND A. ROBERT
`945 Effects of Endogenous. and Exogenous Prostaglandins on
`Glycoprotein Synthesis and Secretion in Isolated Rabbit.
`Gastric Mucosa
`U. SEioLER, K. KNAI LA, R. KOWNA I ZKI, AND K-F. SEWING
`952 Isolation of Endopeptidase-24.11 (EC 3,4.24.11, "En-
`kephalinase") From the Pig Stomach
`N.W. BUNNE AJ. TIIIINLR, J. Ha Y.SZhO, R KOBAYASHI, AND
`J.H. WALSH
`958 Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptides I and II and Calcitonin:
`Distinct Effects on Gastric Acid Secretion in Humans
`C. Mx:LINGER, W. BORN, P. HILDEBRAND, J,W. ENSINCK,
`F. BURKHARDT, J.A. Fiscut R, AND K. GYR
`966 Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide: Enteric and Cardiovas-
`cular Effects in the Dog
`P.G. REASBECK, S.M. BURNS, AND A. SHULKES
`972 Giardia lamblia in Patients Undergoing Endoscopy: Lack
`of Evidence for a Role in Nonulcer Dyspepsia
`M.F. CARR Jr., J, MA, AND P.H.R. GREEN
`975 Effect of Disodium Azodisalicylate on Electrolyte Trans-
`port in Rabbit Ileum and Colon In Vitro
`R. PAMIJKCCI, S.B. HANAULR, AND E.B. CHANC
`982 Breath Hydrogen Testing in Bacterial. Overgrowth of the
`Small Intestine
`P. KERLIN AND L. WONC
`909 Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity by
`Technetium 99m Phagocyte Scanning
`W.E. PULLMAN, P.J. SULLIVAN, P.J. BARR/VIA', J. LISING,
`J.A. BOOTH, AND W.F. DOE
`997 Internal Anal Sphincter in Neurogenic Fecal
`Incontinence
`D.Z. LUBOWSKI, R.J. NICHOLLS, D.E. BURLEIGH, AND M. SWASH
`1003 Primary Culture of the Enteric Nervous System From
`Neonatal Hamster Intestine
`L.Y. KORMAN, E.S. NYLEN, T.M. FINAN, Rd. LINNOILA, AND
`K.L. BECKER
`
`1011 Proenkephalin A-Derived Peptides in the Human Gut
`G-L. FERRI, A. WATKINSON, AND G.J. DOCKRAY
`
`LIVER, PANCREAS, AND BILIARY TRACT
`1018 Evolution and Regression of Pancreatic Calcification in
`Chronic Pancreatitis. A Prospective Long-Term Study of
`107 Patients
`R.W. AMMANN, R. WENCH, R. OT1'0, H. BUEHLER,
`A.U. FREIBURCHAUS, AND W. SIECENTHALER
`1029 Maintenance of Hepatic Bile Acid Secretion. Rate During
`Overnight Fasting by Bedtime Bile Acid Administration
`A. LANZINI, D. FACCHINET11, AND T.C. NoRmrtELD
`1036 Prospective Trial of Penicillamine in Primary Sclerosing
`Cholangitis
`N.F. LARUSSO, R.H. WIESNER, J. Luowic, R.L. MACCARTY,
`S.J. BEAVER, AND A.R. ZINSMEISTER
`1043 Decreased Loss of Liver Adenosine Triphosphate During
`Hypothermic Preservation in Rats Pretreated With
`Glucose
`J.D. PALOMBO, Y. HIRSCHBERG, J.J. POMPOSELLI,
`G.L. BLACKBURN, S.H. ZEISEL, AND B.R. BISTRIAN
`1050 Effect of Nifedipine on Sphincter of Oddi Motor Activity
`M. GUELRUD, S. MENDOZA, G. Rossri LR, L. RAMIREZ, AND
`J. BARKIN
`
`1056 Alcohollike Liver Disease in Nonalcoholics
`A.M. DIEHL, Z. GOODMAN, AND K.G, IsuAR
`1063 Effect of Cessation of Alcohol Use on the Course of Pan-
`creatic Dysfunction in Alcoholic Pancreatitis
`L. GULLO, L BARBARA, AND G. LAeo
`1069 Biliary Motility Associated With Gallbladder Storage and
`Duodenal Delivery of Canine Hepatic Biliary Output
`R.B. SCOTT' AND S.C. DIAMANT
`1081 Intrarenal Thromboxane A2 Generation Reduces the Fu
`rosemide-Induced Sodium and Water Diuresis in Cirrho-
`sis With Ascites
`M. PINZANI, G. LAFTI, E. Ivic Ac (cid:9)
`AND P. GENTILINI
`1088 Pharmacologic Perturbation of Rat Liver Lysosomes: Ef-
`fects on Release of Lysosomal Enzymes and of Lipids Into
`Bile
`R.B. SEWELL, S.A. GM:41,11FM., A.R, ZINsmuls•IER, AM)
`N.F. LARusso
`1099 Effects and Mechanisms of Action of Motilin on the Cat
`Sphincter of Oddi
`J. BEIIAR AND P. BLANC ANI
`
`G. LA VILLA, F. CON/IINE1.1.1,
`
`CASE REPORTS
`1106 Massive Plasma Cell Infiltration of the Digestive Tract
`J.F. COLOMBEL, 1.C. Pe
`J.P. VAERNIAN, A. GALIAN,
`D.L. DELACROIX, J. NEMETH, F. DUPREY, M. HALPHEN,
`P. GODEAU, AND C. DIVE
`1114 Isolated Intestinal Myopathy Resembling Progressive
`Systemic Sclerosis in a Child
`J. JAYACHANDAR, J.L. FRANK, AND M.M. JONAS
`Sandoz v. AbbVie
`Sandoz Ex. 1079
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 1
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`General Information
`GASTROENTEROLOGY: GASTAB 95(4) 903-1166 (1988)
`ISSN 0016-5085
`0 1988 by the American Gastroenterological Association
`Gastroenterology is abstracted/indexed in Biological Ab-
`stracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents, Excerpta
`Medico, Index Medicus, Nutrition Abstracts, and Science
`Citation Index.
`Second class postage paid at New York, NY and at addi-
`tional mailing offices. Issued monthly in two indexed
`volumes per year by Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.,
`655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010. Print-
`ed in U.S.A. at 2901 Byrdhill Road, Richmond, VA 23228.
`1988 Subscription Rates: Institutional, $150.00; individ-
`ual, $90.00; special in-training rate for a period of 3 years
`to residents, fellows, interns, and students, $55.00. In
`requesting this special rate, please give training status and
`name of institution. Outside of the U.S. and possessions,
`please add $45.00 for surface postage and handling. For air
`mail, add $93.00 in U.S.A., Canada, and Mexico. For
`surface air-lift, add $88.00 in Europe and $125.00 in Japan.
`For air mail in all other areas of the world, add $245.00.
`Claims for missing issues can be honored only up to 3
`months for domestic addresses and 6 months for foreign
`addresses. Duplicate copies will not be sent to replace
`ones undelivered through failure to notify Elsevier Science
`Publishing Co., Inc., of change of address,
`Change of address: Please notify Elsevier Science Publish-
`ing Co., Inc., 60 days in advance.
`Postmaster: send all address changes to GASTROENTER-
`OLOGY, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 655 Avenue
`of the Americas, New York, NY 10010.
`Reprints, except special orders of 100 or more, are avail-
`able only from the authors.
`Single copy, microfilm, and back volume information
`available from. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., upon
`request.
`
`Correspondence concerning business matters should be
`addressed to Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc.
`
`Advertising inquiries should be addressed to: Pharmaceu-
`tical Media, Inc., 130 Madison Avenue, New York, NY
`10016.
`
`The Publisher assumes no responsibility for any injury
`and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of
`products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use
`or operation of any methods, products, instructions or
`ideas contained in the material herein. No suggested test or
`procedure should be carried out unless, in the reader's
`judgment, its risk is justified. Because of rapid advances in
`the medical sciences, we recommend that the independent
`verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be
`made. Discussions, views and recommendations as to
`medical procedures, choice of drugs and drug dosages are
`the responsibility of the authors.
`
`Although all advertising material is expected to conform to
`ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication
`does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the
`quality or value of such product or of the claim made of it
`by its manufacturer.
`
`This journal has been registered with the Copyright Clear-
`ance Center, Inc. Consent is given for the copying of
`articles for personal or internal use, or for the personal or
`internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the
`condition that the copier pay through the Center the per
`copy fee stated in the code on the first page of each article
`for copying beyond that permitted by the US Copyright
`Law, If 110 code appears on an article, the author has not
`given broad consent to copy, and permission to copy must
`be obtained directly from the author. This consent does
`not extend to other kinds of copying, such as for general
`distribution, resale, advertising and promotional pur-
`poses, or for creating new collective works.
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 2
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY 1988;95:1036-42
`
`Prospective Trial of Penicillamine in
`Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
`
`NICHOLAS F. LARUSSO, RUSSELL H. WIESNER, JURGEN LUDWIG,
`ROBERT L. MAcCARTY, SANDRA J. BEAVER,
`and ALAN R. ZINSMEISTER
`Departments of Medicine, Pathology, Radiology, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic and
`Mayo Foundation, and the Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota
`
`We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of penicil-
`'amine in primary sclerosing cholangitis. In a ran-
`domized, prospective, double-blind trial, 39 pa-
`tients received penicillamine (250 mg t.i.d.) and 31
`received a placebo. The two groups were highly
`comparable at entry with regard to clinical, bio-
`chemical, radiologic, and hepatic histologic fea-
`tures. Although a predictable cupruresis and a
`decrease in levels of hepatic copper were achieved
`in patients taking penicillamine, there was no ben-
`eficial effect on disease progression within 36 mo or
`on overall survival. Progressive symptoms, deterio
`ration in serial hepatic laboratory values, or his-
`tologic progression on sequential liver biopsy spec-
`imens were similar in both groups, occurring in
`>80% of the entire study population. The develop-
`ment of major side effects led to the permanent
`discontinuation of penicillamine in 21% of the pa-
`tients taking the drug. We conclude that the use of
`penicillamine in primary sclerosing cholangitis is
`not associated with a beneficial effect on disease
`progression or survival, and has considerable tox-
`icity. The study also suggests that primary scleros-
`ing cholangitis is a progressive disease in many
`patients.
`
`p
`rimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a chronic
`hepatobiliary disease of unknown etiology, is
`characterized by diffuse inflammation and fibrosis of
`the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts leading
`to cholestasis, hepatic copper overload, biliary cir-
`rhosis, and premature death from liver failure (1).
`The cause is unknown; damage to small and large
`bile ducts may be due to immune mechanisms.
`Increased hepatic copper concentrations in this con-
`dition probably are the result of diminished hepato-
`biliary copper excretion (2,3). Currently, no effective
`
`medical therapy:for PSC is available. Moreover, no
`controlled therapeutic trials have been performed.
`Because of the cupruretic, antifibrogenic, and hu-
`munosuppressive effects of penicillamine (a-penicil-
`lamine) (4-6), as well as the initial promising results
`of this agent in the treatment of primary biliary
`cirrhosis (PBC), a cholestatic disease with many
`similarities to PSC (7), we initiated in 1980 a ran-
`domized' double-blind trial of penicillamine voHus
`placebo. After treating 70 patients for a minimum of
`36 mo, we found no beneficial effect of penicillamine
`on the progression of PSC. Also, use of this drug was
`associated with a high incidence of serious but
`reversible sitle effects.
`
`Patients and Methods
`Patient Selection
`All patients with PSC who had been evaluated at
`the Mayo Clinic were considered for entry into the study.
`Diagnosis of PSC was based on the following criteria (1):
`established liver disease of >6-mo duration; a serum lsvel
`of alkaline phosphatase more than twice the upper limit of
`normal; a cholangiogram demonstrating diffuse (>25%)
`narrowing, irregularity, dilatation, and tortuosity of the
`extrahepatic biliary ductal system with or without in-
`volvement of the intrahepatic ductal system; and a preen-
`try liver biopsy specimen compatible with the diagnosis of
`PSC and showing cholangitis or portal hepatitis (stage 1),
`periportal fibrosis or periportal hepatitis (stage II), septa)
`fibrosis, bridging necrosis, or both (stage III), or biliary
`cirrhosis (stage IV) (8), Patients were excluded from entry
`for the following reasons: previous biliary tract surgery
`(excluding simple cholecystectomy) or documented
`choledocholithiasis (not cholelithiasis) before the diagno-
`sis of PSC, radiographic changes (e.g., focal constriction
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: PBC, primary biliary cir'
`rhosis; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis.
`© 1988 by the American Gastroenterological Associaticn
`0016-5085/88/$3.50
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 3
`
`

`

`October 1988 (cid:9)
`
`PENICILLAIvIINE IN PSC 1037
`
`with proximal duct dilatation) strongly suggestive of
`cholangiocarcinoma, alcohol abuse, or a malignancy other
`than skin cancer. Of the 197 patients referred to us from
`June 1, 1980, to May 31, 1983, for consideration for entry
`into the trial, 70 (36%) were enrolled and 56 (28%) did not
`fulfill entry criteria and were excluded; 71 patients (36%)
`fulfilled entry criteria but chose not to participate. The
`most common reasons for not entering the trial were
`reluctance to travel to the Mayo Clinic for annual evalua-
`tion, including liver biopsy, economic concerns regarding
`return visits, and apprehension regarding possible drug
`side effects.
`Of these 71 patients with PSC who chose not to enter the
`study, an initial liver biopsy specimen was available for
`review in 54 (76%). The 54 nonstudy patients with liver
`biopsies were compared with the 70 study patients based
`on entry data. Using study versus nonstudy as the depen-
`dent variable, a logistic regression analysis (9) examined
`the association of various entry variables, with study par-
`ticipation. There was an association with histologic, stage
`of disease (77% of study patients vs. 59% of nonstudy
`patients had stage III or IV disease), but no other variables
`were associated with entry into the study.
`
`Study Organization and Randomization
`Each patient was provided with a detailed descrip:
`tion of the nature and goals of the study and signed a
`written consent form. A complete medical history was
`obtained and a physical examination performed on each
`patient at entry. Baseline laboratory tests included a com-
`plete blood count, urinalysis, and measurements of serum
`alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransfer-
`ase, albumin, y-globulin, cholesterol, ceruloplasmin and
`copper, antimitochondrial antibody, hepatitis B surface
`antigen, prothrombin time, immunoglobulins A, G, and M,
`and a 24-h urinary excretion of copper. A barium-swallow
`examination or upper endoscopy, or both, was performed
`to determine whether esophageal varices were present. At
`entry, 56 (80%) patients had endoscopic retrograde chol-
`angiography performed at the Mayo Clinic using a stan-
`dardized procedure. In the remaining 14 (20%) patients,
`cholangiograms performed elsewhere during the 6 months
`before entry were available for review. All patients at entry
`had either a colonoscopic examination (n = 26) or both a
`protoscopic examination and a double-contrast barium
`enema (n = 44). All patients were instructed at entry in a
`low copper diet by a dietitian.
`A preentry liver biopsy specimen was obtained and
`processed as described (10). For the measurement of he-
`patic copper, atomic absorption spectrophotometry was
`used.
`Patient cohorts were stratified based on the presence or
`absence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy or varices on radio-
`rraphic or endoscopic examination of the tipper gastroin-
`testinal tract. Patients were randomly assigned to drug or
`placebo groups. Randomization was weighted in favor of
`the drug group in anticipation of possible drug toxicity
`requiring severance from the study. Penicillamine and
`placebo (furnished to us through the courtesy of Merck
`Sharp & Dohme, West Point, Pa.) were dispensed in
`identical yellow capsules by one pharmacist.
`
`Treatment Regimen and Follow-up
`Patients were reexamined 6 mo and 1 yr after entry
`and at yearly intervals therafter. Liver biopsies and endo-
`scopic retrograde cholangiograms were repeated at 12-mo
`intervals• or as clinically indicated. All biopsy specimens
`were interpreted by one pathologist (J.L.) and all cholangi-
`ograms by one radiologist (R.L.M.) without knowledge of
`the clinical history or treatment group. The initial dose
`was 1 capsule of penicillamine (250 mg) or placebo each
`day for 4 wk. The dose was increased by 1 capsule per day
`every 4 wk until a maintenance dose of 3 capsules per day
`was achieved.
`Patients from either group were referred for liver trans-
`plantation if they developed advanced, irreversible end-
`stage liver disease that resulted in either life-threatening
`complications or an unacceptable quality of life.
`
`Toxicity Monitoring
`Determinations of hemoglobin levels, counts of
`leukocytes and platelets, and routine urinalysis were per-
`formed at 2-wk intervals for the first 3 mo of therapy; after
`that, leukocyte and platelet counts were performed every
`6-8 wk. The 24-hr urinary excretion of protein and copper
`was measured at 1 and 3 mo after entry and at 3-mo
`intervals thereafter. Toxicity was categorized as minor or
`major as previously described (10).
`All decisions regarding appropriate management of pos-
`sible drug reactions were made by an intramural study
`monitor who did not otherwise participate in the study.
`
`Management of Associated Inflammatory
`Bowel Disease
`Inflammatory bowel disease was defined by con-
`ventional radiologic, colonoscopic, or histologic criteria.
`At entry, 45 patients had inflammatory bowel disease. In
`general, study patients with inflammatory bowel disease
`did not require aggressive medical or surgical treatment for
`intestinal disease because it was almost always asympto-
`matic or only minimally symptomatic. Patients did not
`require steroid treatment for their inflammatory bowel
`disease during the trial but 21 (48%) patients with associ-
`ated inflammatory bowel disease were treated with azul-
`fidine or azulfidine and imodium (12 on placebo and 9 on
`penicillarnine). All study patients who had not undergone
`colectomy had annual proctoscopic examination with rec-
`tal biopsy plus double-contrast barium enema (49%) or a
`colonoscopy (51%) performed at the Mayo Clinic, regard-
`less of whether a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease
`had been made at entry.
`
`Statistical Methods
`Comparison of treatment groups focused on five
`endpoints: (a) overall survival (follow-up censored at liver
`transplant or last follow-up); (b) time to treatment failure
`(failure based on clinical, biochemical, cholangiographic,
`and hepatic histologic indices); (c) changes (entry vs. 1 yr)
`in biochemical variables; (d) progression of hepatic histol-
`ogy; and (e) overall progression as judged by a combina-
`tion of clinical (e.g., development of ascites or encepha-
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 4
`
`

`

`1038 LARUSSO ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 95, No,
`
`Table .1, Characteristics of Study Population at Entry
`
`Variable
`
`Number
`Age
`Mean
`Range
`Sex (% male)
`Symptoms 1% present)
`Prior surgery (%)
`Yes
`Proctocolectomy
`Cholecystectomy
`Bile duct.reconstruction
`Associated diseases (%)
`Chronic ulcerative colitis
`Grohn's disease
`Cholelithiasis
`Complications (%)
`Portal hypertension
`Cholangitis
`Biochemical tests (median)
`Bilirubin (mg/dl)
`Alkaline phosphatase (U/L; normal
`<250)
`SCOT (U/L; normal <30)
`Albumin (g/dl)
`Urine copper (pg/24 h; normal <60 p.g/
`24 h)
`Hepatic copper (normal •<40 p..g/g liver)
`Hepatic histology (%)
`Early
`(Stage I or II)
`Advanced
`(Stage HI or IV)
`Duration of follow-up (yr) (median)
`Patients still alive
`Patients dead
`Number undergoing liver transplanation
`SCOT, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase.
`
`Entire
`population
`70
`
`42
`17-71
`63
`83
`
`67
`26
`30
`13
`
`66
`
`17
`
`30
`27
`
`1,8
`1097
`
`81
`3.35
`87
`
`212
`
`23
`
`77
`
`Placebo
`31
`
`42
`17-70
`65:
`90
`
`61
`19
`29
`13
`
`58
`3
`
`26
`35
`
`2.4
`1242
`
`82
`3,46
`119
`
`237
`
`19.
`
`8)
`
`Pencillamine
`39
`
`42
`20-71
`62
`77
`
`72
`31
`31
`13
`
`72
`0'
`
`33
`21
`
`1.5
`973
`
`70
`3.26
`87
`
`150
`
`26
`
`74
`
`39 (n = 53)
`1.2 (n = 17)
`12
`
`24)
`4.1 (n (cid:9)
`1..6 (r). =- 7)
`5
`
`3.7 (n = 29)
`1,0 (n = 10)
`7
`
`lopathy), biochemical (e.g, increases in bilirubin, alkaline
`phosphatase, aminotransferases, and prothrombin time, or
`a decrease in albumin), and hepatic histologic. (e.g., his-
`tologic stages on liver biopsy) variables. A proportional
`hazards regression analysis (11) was used to compare
`treatment groups on overall survival, time to treatment
`failure, and progression, adjusting for entry histologic
`stage and the stratification factor (cirrhosis/portal hyper-
`tension). The two-sample t-test was used to compare the
`changes in biochemical variables.
`
`Results
`
`Study Population
`
`The two treatment groups were comparable at
`the time of randomization with regard to clinical,
`biochemical, cholangiographic, and hepatic his-
`tologic indices. Table 1 shows the characteristics of
`the study population at entry.
`
`Analysis of Treatment Effect
`
`Clinical, biochemical, and cholangiograph is
`changes. There was no consistent clinical improve-
`ment in either the drug or placebo group with regard
`to symptoms such as pruritus,, fatigue, cholangitis,
`portal-systemic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding,
`or specific features on physical examination, such as
`excoriations, hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, or hyper-
`pigmentation. No difference in time to treatment
`failure was detected between placebo and drug
`groups.
`Table 2 shows biochemical changes in the patients
`with data at entry and 1 yr after entry. Changes 'n
`laboratory values over the 1-yr period were similar
`in the drug and placebo groups with regard to levels
`of albumin, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferw
`alkaline phosphatase, y-globulin, platelets, hemoglo-
`bin, and prothrombin time. There was a significant
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 5
`
`

`

`October 1988 (cid:9)
`
`PENICILLAMINE IN PSC 1039
`
`Table 2. Biochemical Data at Entry and at 1 Year°
`
`Variable
`
`Bilirubin (mg/di)
`
`Alkaline phosphatase
`(U/L)
`Aspartate aminotrans-
`ferase (U/L)
`Albumin (g/dl)
`
`y-Globulin
`
`Prothrombin time (s)
`
`Hemoglobin (g/dI)
`
`Platelets (x 103/mm 3)
`
`Urinary copper (mg/
`24 h)
`Hepatic copper (11,g/g)
`
`Group
`
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`Drug
`Placebo
`
`n
`
`32
`28
`32
`28
`32
`28
`32
`28
`32
`28
`39
`31
`39
`31
`32
`28
`28
`27
`21
`23
`
`At entry
`Mean ± SE
`
`3.4 ± 1.3
`3.9 ± 1.0
`1196 -± 123
`1475 ± 169
`87 ± 8
`105 ± 15
`3.4 ± 0.1
`3.4 ± 0.1
`1.7 ± 0.1
`1.6 ± 0.1
`10,6 ± 0.14
`10.7 ± 0.3
`13.1 ± 0.3
`13.0 ± 0.3
`284 ± 28
`244 ± 21
`121 ± 24
`110 ± 18
`233 ±.49.
`292 ±. 65
`
`Median.
`
`1.3
`2.2
`984
`1239
`68
`82
`3.3
`3.5
`1.7
`1.6
`10.4
`10.1
`13.1
`13.6
`244
`258
`76
`80
`123
`212
`
`32
`28.
`32
`28
`32
`28
`32
`27
`32
`27
`32
`28
`32
`28
`32
`28
`28
`27
`21
`23
`
`At 1 yr
`Mean ± SE
`
`4.9 ± 1.1
`4.5 ± 1.2
`1371 ± 188
`1327 ± 1.34
`94 ± 14
`117 ± 16
`3.1 ± 0.1
`3.4 ± 0.1
`1.6 ± 0.4
`1.7 .± 0.1
`10.7 ± 0.14
`11.2 ± 0.3
`13.1 ± 0.4
`12.9 -± 0.3
`231 ± 22
`197 ± 17
`358 ± 50
`112 ± 23
`176 ± 49
`256 ± 39
`
`Median
`
`2.5
`1.8
`1140
`1200
`60
`99
`3.2
`3.4
`1.6
`1.7
`106
`108
`13.2
`13.1
`226
`181
`295
`67
`91
`189
`
`° In those subjects with both 1- and 3-yr data, the biochemical values were similar within each group at 1 and 3 yr. However, 50% of the
`subjects in each group did not have urine copper values, for example, at year 3. Thus, to minimize the possible influence of selection
`bias, the 1-yr data (available in most subjects) 'are presented' above along with the entry data for the same subjects.
`
`obtained showed no change over the course of the
`study on serial cholangiograms. Twenty-one (39%)
`patients showed deterioration in the form of increas-
`ing stricture formation or increasing irregularities of
`the mucosal surfaces of the ducts. Of those 21, 11
`were on penicillamine and 10 were on placebo. Only
`1 patient on penicillamine showed cholangiographic
`evidence of improvement during the trial. A second
`patient on the drug showed possible improvement.
`Thus, penicillamine treatment was not associated
`with reversal of cholangiographic abnormalities and
`did not protect against cholangiographic deteriora-
`tion when compared with placebo.
`Hepatic histology. Figure 1 shows the effect
`of penicillamine versus placebo on the development
`of abnotitialities on liver biopsy in the two groups of
`patients studied. The rate of progression from early
`to advanced disease histologically was as rapid with
`the drug regimen as it was with placebo. Also,
`morphologic features such as inflammation and cho-
`lestasis did not differ substantially between groups
`on entry or on sequential biopsies. The only notable
`difference between groups was a decreased intensity
`in copper staining in specimens from patients on
`penicillamine.
`Survival. Penicillamine did not produce an
`overall improvement in survival as compared with
`placebo (Figure 2); the median survival times were
`>4 yr for both the drug and -placebo groups.
`
`difference between the drug and placebo groups in
`hepatic copper concentration and in urinary copper
`excretion at 1 yr after entry; in the penicillamine
`group a median decrease of 55% in hepatic copper
`was observed, whereas hepatic copper increased by
`1% in the placebo group. Also, urinary copper was
`increased by 250% in the penicillamine group but
`decreased by 20% in the placebo group.
`All patients at entry had cholangiographic find-
`ings consistent with PSC. Thirty of the 54 (56%)
`patients in whom follow-up cholangiograms were
`
`D'-pen
`Placebo
`
`Progression, %
`
`2
`1 (cid:9)
`Years from entry
`Figure 1. The effect of penicillamine (0-pen) on hepatic his-
`tologic progression is shown. Histologic progression is
`defined as an increase of at least one stage (e.g., stage III
`to stage IV) on serial liver biopsy.
`
`3
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 6
`
`(cid:9)
`

`

`1040 LARUSSO ET AL.
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 95, No. 4
`
`D-pen
`Placebo
`
`(10)
`
`Progression variables
`
`• Ascites/varices
`• Bilirubin (> 3 mg/c11 t )
`• Histologic stage
`• Referral for OLT
`• Death by liver failure
`
`Progression, %
`
`(27)
`
`(26)
`
`(21)
`
`Placebo
`D-pen
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Cu
`
`2
`1 (cid:9)
`Years from entry
`
`3
`
`Figure 2. The effect of penicillamine (n-pen) on survival is
`shown. The graph represents the Kaplan—Meier esti-
`mated survival with censoring of patients referred for
`liver transplantation.
`
`0
`
`2 (cid:9)
`
`3
`
`Years from entry
`
`Figure 3. The effect of penicillamine (u-pen) on overall progres-
`sion. The graph represents the Kaplan—Meier estimate.
`OLT = orthotopic liver transplantation.
`
`Overall progression. Penicillamine did not
`affect overall progression of the disease compared
`with placebo (Figure 3) as assessed by a combination
`of clinical, biochemical, and hepatic histologic var-
`iables. The number of subjects requiring liver trans-
`plantation was similar in the placebo (5 of 31) and in
`the penicillamine (7 of 39) groups.
`Toxicity. Major side effects led to the perma-
`nent discontinuation of penicillamine therapy in 8
`of 39 patients (21%) taking penicillamine. In addi-
`tion, there were 20 minor reactions among the
`penicillamine group and 9 among the placebo group
`that may have been drug related (Table 3). When
`toxicity was included in the definition of treatment
`failure, then time to treatment failure was signifi-
`cantly (p < 0.05) shorter in the penicillamine group.
`No patients died as a result of known side effects
`of penicillamine. Presumed major side effects of
`penicillamine always resolved after the drug had
`been discontinued.
`
`Discussiori
`In our study, penicillamine (750 mg/day) had
`no beneficial effect on the course, complications, and
`survival of patients with PSC. This lack of benefit
`over a 3-yr period was evident even though penicil-
`lamine resulted in a marked cupruresis and a signif-
`icant decrease in hepatic copper content.
`As this is the first randomized trial of any medical
`therapy in PSC, we are unable to compare our results
`with a published study. However, use of penicil-
`lamine has been evaluated in PBC (10,12), a chronic
`cholestatic syndrome with many similarities to PSC
`(7). As in our study, penicillamine produces a
`cupruresis and a decrease in hepatic copper content
`in PBC, but does not affect survival. Although certain
`
`biochemical tests (e.g., serum aspartate aminotranr-
`ferase) may be improved by penicillamine in PBC,
`we found no benefit of penicillamine on any bio-
`chemical parameters in our patients with PSC. Sim-
`ilar to studies of penicillamine in PBC, we saw no
`beneficial effect of the drug on the histologic progres-
`sion of PSC.
`Penicillamine was not only ineffective in our pa-
`tients with PSC, its use was associated with a high
`incidence of ,serious side effects. This high rate of
`drug toxicity is similar to that seen in PBC and
`rheumatoid arthritis (10,12,13). Indeed, in each of
`these two diseases, approximately one-third of pa-
`tients receiving penicillamine have side effects seri-
`ous enough to necessitate permanent discontinua-
`
`Table 3. Possible Drug-Belated Side Effects.
`
`Reaction
`
`Placebo
`(n = 31)
`
`Penicillarnige
`(n = 39)
`
`Allergic
`Cytopenia
`Diarrhea
`Proteinuria
`Hair loss
`Hemolysis
`Arthralgias
`Dysgeusia
`Lichen pianos
`
`Total
`
`Drug discontinued because of
`side effects (all reversible)
`Fatal drug reactions
`
`0
`5
`0
`3
`0
`0
`1
`0
`0
`91,
`
`0
`
`0
`
`2"
`5°
`2
`12'
`1
`3
`1
`1
`1
`
`28"
`
`8 (21%)
`
`0
`
`Both patients with allergic reactions, 1 of 5 with cytopenia, and
`5 of 12 with proteinuria had the drug permanently discor Ha-
`uer]. b Reactions in 8 of 31 (26%). Reactions in 25 of 39 (64%).
`
`Ex. 1079 - Page 7
`
`

`

`October 1988 (cid:9)
`
`PENICILLAMINE IN PSC 1041
`
`tion of the drug. Although the high incidence of side
`effects induced by penicillamine in patients with
`rheumatoid arthritis may be associated with the
`increased occurrence of the HLA-DRw3 antigen (14),
`e did not assess HLA antigen status in our patients
`with PSC.
`The results of our study have several implications.
`First, they suggest that therapy aimed at diminishing
`hepatic copper overload in patients with PSC is not
`likely to be beneficial. This conclusion further sug-
`gests that hepatic copper overload is indeed a sec-
`ondary manifestation of the chronic cholestasis
`caused by PSC and does not have a primary patho-
`genetic role in its progression (3). Also, although
`penicillamine has immunosuppressive effects, they
`appear to be relatively weak (5,6). Therefore, we do
`not believe that our negative study should be inter-
`preted as evidence against a role for therapeutic
`trials of immunosuppressive agents in PSC, particu
`larly as recent, accumulating data support altered
`immunity as an important pathogenetic factor in this
`disease (15,16). Indeed, we are currently conducting
`just such a trial using cyclosporiny A a potent
`immunosuppressive agent. Given the chronic, fi-
`brotic nature of PSC and recent encouraging data
`with colchicine in PBC (17), it would seem reason-
`able to also consider therapeutic trials using antifi-
`brogenic agents in. PSC, perhaps in combination with
`immunosuppressive agents. Recent uncontrolled
`data from our group showing improvement in liver
`tests in a small group of patients with PSC given
`colchicine plus prednisone supports this approach
`(18). Finally, although our results showing no bene-
`ficial effect of.penicillamine in PSC are disappoint-
`ing, the availability of a large, homogeneous popu-
`lation of patients and the opportunity to follow these
`patients serially in the context of a therapeutic trial
`has allowed us to generate important and novel data
`on the clinical, biochemical, radiologic, and his-
`°logic features of this previously obscure syndrome
`12,3,7,8,15,16,19). Indeed, from the viewpoint of
`natural history, our results showing clinical, bio-
`.themical, or hepatic histologic progression, alone or
`in combination, in the overwhelming majority of our
`patients suggest that PSC is often a progressive
`disease (20),
`In conclusion, our results suggest that penicil-
`lamine is .not effective in the treatment

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket