throbber
V•37
`
`C . 02 (cid:9)
`TI: GUT
`
`WI GU821
`NO.S (cid:9)
`199a
`SEQ: u14200000
`
`1 1/ 20/95 ut
`
`AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
`
`Leading articles
`
`593 (cid:9) Metal stents in the oesophagus R P Sturgess, A I Morris
`Peptides and gastrointestinal mucosal integrity R1 Playford
`595 (cid:9)
`
`Oesophagus
`
`Peptic ulcer
`
`598 (cid:9)
`
`603 (cid:9)
`
`Endocytosis of fluorescent microspheres by human oesophageal epithelial cells: comparison
`between normal and inflamed tissue D Hopwood, E M Spiers, P E Ross, J Anderson,
`B McCullough, F E Murray
`Oesophageal sensation assessed by electrical stimuli and brain evoked potentials — a new
`model for visceral nociception 0 Frobert, L Arendt-Nielsen, P Bak, P Funchjensen,
`P Bagger
`
`610 (cid:9)
`
`613 (cid:9)
`
`Basic fibroblast growth factor treatment for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
`associated gastric ulceration M A Hull, D J E Cullen, N Hudson, C J Hawkey
`Corticosteroids reduce regenerative repair of epithelium in experimental gastric ulcers
`M Carpani de Kaski, R Rentsch, S Levi, H J F Hodgson
`617 (cid:9) Mortality after remote surgery for benign gastroduodenal disease
`C C S Stael von Holstein, H Anderson, S B S Eriksson, B Huldt
`
`Small intestine
`
`623 (cid:9)
`
`630 (cid:9)
`
`639 (cid:9)
`
`Intestinal absorptive capacity, intestinal permeability and jejunal histology in HIV and their
`relation to diarrhoea J Keating, I Bjarnason, S Somasundaram, A Macpherson, N Francis,
`A B Price, D Sharpstone, J Smithson, I S Menzies, B G Gazzard
`Administration of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) peptides for three days stimulates
`proliferation of the small intestinal epithelium in rats C B Steeb, J F Trahair, L C Read
`Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients L R Pistorius,
`W H Sweidan, D W Purdie, S A Steel, S Howey, J R Bennett, D R Sutton
`
`Motility
`
`Inflammatory
`bowel disease
`
`643 (cid:9)
`
`Evaluation of antral motility in humans using manometry and scintigraphy K Jones,
`M Edelbroek, M Horowitz, W-M Sun, J Dent, J Roelofs, T Muecke, L Akkermans
`649 (cid:9) Motor activity recorded in the unprepared colon of healthy humans M Lemann,
`B Flourie, L Picon, B Coffin, R Jian, J C Rambaud
`Effects of simvastatin and cholestyramine on bile lipid composition and gall bladder
`motility in patients with hypercholesterolaemia J W A Smit, K J Van Erpecum,
`P Portincasa, W Renooij, I) W Erkelens, G P Van Berge-Henegouwen
`
`654 (cid:9)
`
`660 (cid:9) Mycobacterium paratuberculosis DNA not detected in Crohn's disease tissue by fluorescent
`polymerase chain reaction D S Rowbotham, N P Mapstone, L K Trejdosiewicz,
`P D Howdle, P Quirke
`668 (cid:9) Meta-analysis of the role of oral contraceptive agents in inflammatory bowel disease
`P G Godet, G R May, L R Sutherland
`A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in the management of Crohn's disease
`S Candy, J Wright, M Gerber, G Adams, M Gerig, R Goodman
`
`674 (cid:9)
`
`679 (cid:9)
`
`Quantitative assessment of overall inflammatory bowel disease activity using labelled
`leucocytes: a direct comparison between indium-111 and technetium-99m HMPAO
`methods J C Mansfield, M H Giqffer, W B Tindale, C D Holdsworth
`
`PROPERTY
`llaI6 OFI THE
`LIBRARY OF
`MEDICINE
`
`BMJ
`
`CONTENTS CONTINUED INSIDE
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 1
`
`

`

`CONTENTS CONTINUED
`
`684 (cid:9)
`
`690 (cid:9)
`
`696 (cid:9)
`
`702 (cid:9)
`
`708 (cid:9)
`
`712 (cid:9)
`
`721 (cid:9)
`
`727 (cid:9)
`
`731 (cid:9)
`
`Kinetic studies on colonocyte metabolism of short chain fatty acids and glucose in
`ulcerative colitis M Rye Clausen, I' B Mortensen
`Transglutaminases in Crohn's disease G D'Argenio, L Biancone, V Cosenza,
`N Della Valle, F 1' D'Artniento, M Boirivant, I; Palime, G Mazzacca
`F Makowiec, E C lehle, M Starlinger
`
`Clinical course of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease
`Oral efficacy of a leukotriene B , receptor antagonist in colitic cotton-top tamarins
`I) Fretland, T Sanderson, I' Smith, L Adams, I? Carson, 7 Fuhr, j Tanner, N Glop
`I. Beaugerie, N Patey, N Brousse
`Ranitidine, diarrhoea, and lymphocytic colitis
`
`Overexpression of nn/23-111 and nnt23-.H2 genes in colorectal carcinomas and loss Of
`,
`nm23-H I expression in advanced tumour stages 1 A Martinez, S Prevot, B Nordhnger
`I M A Nguyen, y Lac:at-rim, A Mintier, I Lascu, C Valliant, J capeau, M L Lacombe
`
`Efficacy of longterm interferon treatment in chronic liver disease evaluated by sensitive
`0 Yokosuka, N Kato,
`polymerise chain reaction assay for hepatitis C virus RNA
`K Hosoda, Y Ito, F Imazeki, M Ohto, M Omata
`
`Gangaidzo, V RGordeuk
`Hepatocellular carcinoma and African iron overload I ;/'
`
`A Kapur,
`
`Linear IgA dermatosis, coeliac disease, and extraintestinal B cell lymphoma
`F 7' Isaacs, P R Kelsey
`
`Large intestine
`
`Liver
`
`Hypothesis
`
`Case report
`
`International (cid:9)
`Gastroenterology
`
`734 A D Beattie
`
`736 (cid:9) Book reviews Notes
`
`
`
`Th is m atari a 1 Was copi ed
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 2
`
`

`

`674
`
`_
`
`Gut 1995; 37: 674-678
`
`A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in
`the management of Crohn's disease
`
`S Candy, J Wright, M Gerber, G Adams, M Gerig, R Goodman
`
`Abstract
`While immunosuppressive agents are
`used widely in the management of
`Crohn's disease, their efficacy has not
`been well established in randomised con-
`trolled trials. This study was designed to
`examine whether azathioprine increases
`remission rate when used in conjunction
`with a diminishing dose regimen of pred-
`nisolone over a period of 12 weeks. It
`further examined whether azathioprine
`offers any therapeutic advantage over
`placebo in the maintenance of remission
`in Crohn's disease over a period of 15
`months. Sixty three patients with active
`Crohn's disease were treated with a 12
`week diminishing dose of prednisolone
`and at the same time entered into a
`randomised, double blind 15 month
`trial of either azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg) or
`placebo. Remission rates between the two
`groups were compared at 12 weeks and at
`15 months. There was no significant
`difference in the proportion of patients
`who had achieved and maintained
`remission by week 12 but at 15 months
`there was a highly significant difference in
`the proportion of patients in remission
`(42% receiving azathioprine v 7% receiv-
`ing placebo), p=0.001. Using life tables
`this beneficial effect was reflected as the
`difference in the median number of days
`on the trial (p =0.02). There were signifi-
`cantly greater decreases over the trial
`period in the median erythrocyte sedi-
`mentation rate, C reactive protein, and
`leucocyte count in the azathioprine group.
`There were no cases of severe bone
`marrow suppression or clinical pancreati-
`tis. In conclusion, azathioprine offers a
`therapeutic advantage over placebo in the
`maintenance of remission in Crohn's
`disease.
`(Gut 1995; 37: 674-678)
`
`Keywords: Crohn's disease, azathioprine,
`immunosuppression.
`
`clinical settings but their efficacy has yet to be
`proved unequivocally in controlled trials. A
`recent meta-analysis of all published single
`drug controlled trials concluded that no single
`drug affords a therapeutic advantage in the
`maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.'
`This study was designed to examine the com-
`bined effect of azathioprine and prednisolone
`in inducing remission in active Crohn's disease
`and further to test the efficacy of azathioprine
`alone in the maintenance of remission.
`
`Methods
`
`PAT 11'.1511
`The study was approved by the Ethics and
`Research Committee of the Faculty,. of
`Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital. Each
`patient gave written informed consent before
`entry into the study. Patients between the ages
`of 15 and 65 years with confirmed Crohn's
`disease who were being followed up at the
`Groote Schuur Hospital Inflammatory Bowel
`Disease Clinic provided the source population.
`The inclusion criteria were a radiological or
`endoscopic diagnosis of Crohn's disease and
`the presence of active disease determined by a
`score of 200 or more on the Crohn's Disease
`Activity Index." Patients excluded were thos,e
`with extensive previous surgery for Crohn s
`disease or those with symptoms suggestive of a
`mechanical obstruction that might require
`imminent surgery. Recent immunosuppres-
`5100, compromised hepatic function, preg-
`nancy, and lactation were further exclusions:
`s
`At entry, age, the time since onset Of symptom
`
`and the time since diagnosis, smoking status,
`extent of
`disease, previous surgery, previous
`medical management (specifically any recent
`corticosteroid treatment), disease activity
`(reflected by the CDAI, erythrocyte sechmen:
`tation rate (ESR), serum C reactive protein
`(CRP) and orosomucoid) and the presence or
`(cid:9) were
`absence of perianal disease and fistulas
`recorded.
`
`The aetiology of Crohn's disease is unknown
`and as a result treatment options are limited.
`Corticosteroids, despite their side effects,
`remain the treatment modalities of choice.
`Intensive research has been directed at finding
`a safe and effective alternative to corticos-
`teroids, particularly for use in resistant Crohn's
`disease and in the maintenance of remission.
`Immunosuppressive drugs such as azathio-
`prine and its active metabolite, 6-mercapto-
`purine, have been used extensively in these
`
`STUDY DRUG
`The azathioprine formulation was in the form
`of film coated tablets, trade name imuran
`(Wellcome Pty, Kempton Park, South Africa).
`
`STUDY DESIGN
`This was a single centre, two phase, douhlde
`blind, placebo controlled trial that compare
`,
`rednisolone and
`the combined effect of p and placebo Ina
`azathioprine v prednisolone
`the treatment of active Crohn's disease over
`
`
`
`This m aterial was copied
`
`Gastrointestinal
`Clinic, Department of
`Medicine, University
`of Cape Town and
`Groote Schuur
`Hospital, South Africa
`S Candy
`J Wright
`M Gerber
`G Adams
`M Gerig
`R Goodman
`
`Correspondence to:
`Dr S Candy, Groote Schuur
`Hospital, Gastro-intestinal
`Clinic, E23, E-Floor,
`NGSH, Observatory, Cape
`Town 7925, South Africa.
`
`Accepted for publication
`16 March 1995
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 3
`
`

`

`44%041,
`
`A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in the management of Crohn's disease
`
`675
`
`cyte count at week 1 was normal, the patient
`was advised to take the full dose (2.5 mg/kg to
`the nearest 50 mg) as a single daily admini-
`stration. Where the leucocyte count dropped
`to less than 4X 109/1, the dose of trial drug
`was reduced, usually by 50 mg initially. The
`count was then monitored closely. In the
`event of good recovery, the original dose was
`reinstated. Compliance was assessed at each
`subsequent visit by means of a tablet count.
`
`EVALUATION METHODS
`Patients were asked to keep a diary charting
`stool number and consistency, abdominal
`pain, general wellbeing, concomitant medica-
`tion, and any adverse clinical experiences.
`There were two evaluation points; the first
`being at cessation of prednisolone at 12 weeks
`and the second at the end of 15 months. The
`primary measure of therapeutic response was
`in each case the proportion of patients in
`remission. Remission was defined at 12 weeks
`as a CDAI of <150 and at 15 months as a
`CDAI <175. Withdrawal for any reason other
`than clinical relapse was considered thera-
`peutic failure.
`Secondary measures of therapeutic response
`were the median change in CDAI, ESR, serum
`CRP, serum orosomucoid concentration, and
`leucocyte count between the first and last
`visits.
`The difference in leucocyte count between
`baseline and final visit was compared for
`responders v non-responders within the aza-
`thioprine group to ascertain whether induction
`of leucopenia predicts clinical response.
`
`period of 12 weeks (phase 1). The second
`phase (phase 2) compared azathioprine alone
`v placebo in the maintenance of remission
`induced in phase 1 over a further 12 months.
`Patients were recruited as they presented
`over a 36 month period. They were stratified
`according to disease extent into three groups;
`group 1: those with only ileal disease, group 2:
`those with ileocolitis, and group 3: those with
`isolated colonic disease. They were then ran-
`domised to either active medication or placebo
`to ensure equal representation of disease
`extent within the treatment groups. At entry a
`baseline assessment of the previous weeks'
`symptoms was made and the patients were
`examined clinically. Blood was drawn to
`measure ESR, serum CRP and orosomucoid,
`as well as comprehensive haematological and
`biochemical indices.
`Visits were scheduled weekly for the first
`month, twice weekly for the second month, and
`monthly thereafter for the remainder of the trial
`or until withdrawal. Predetermined withdrawal
`criteria were: failure to achieve remission within
`the first 12 weeks (defined by a CDAI of
`--ISO), relapse (defined as a CDAI >175) at
`any stage thereafter, patient request, discretion
`of the investigators and bone marrow suppres-
`sion, defined as a haemoglobin of less than
`7.0 g/dl, a white cell count of less than 2 x 109/1
`or a platelet count lower than 100X109/1.
`Haematological and biochemical indices were
`monitored independently by a physician not
`involved in the clinical assessment. Decisions
`regarding drug dose adjustment were relayed to
`the patient by the nurse practitioner who was
`also responsible for symptom assessment,
`drawing blood, counting remaining tablets, and
`issuing the trial medications.
`The physician responsible for the clinical
`examination recorded any reported side effect
`or adverse event experienced by the trialist
`since the last visit and noted any concomitant
`medication taken.
`All medications for Crohn's disease were
`stopped at entry except for antidiarrhoeal
`drugs, which too were recorded at each visit.
`
`STATISTICAL METHODS
`All patients randomised into the trial were
`analysed — that is, analysis was performed on
`an intention to treat basis. No data necessary
`for the calculation of the CDAI were missing.
`A two-tailed X2 test was used to analyse the
`difference in the proportion of patients in
`remission at week 12 and at trial end. A
`Wilcoxon test was used to compare the median
`change from baseline to last visit in CDAI,
`ESR, CRP, orosomucoid concentration, and
`leucocyte count between the two groups.
`The calculated 'relative risk' — that is, the rela-
`tive protective effect proferred by azathioprine —
`was adjusted for key potential confounders
`using the Mantel-Haenszel calculation. The
`simultaneous influence of a number of covari-
`ates on the association of treatment status and
`outcome was examined by means of the logistic
`regression procedure of SAS (Ver 6.08). A
`Kaplan-Meier life table analysis was used to
`compute the median time to relapse. Analysis of
`variance was used to compare the median time
`to relapse by disease extent.
`
`Results
`
`PATIENTS
`A total of 63 patients were randomised to
`receive either placebo or azathioprine in
`
`slimy DRUG ADMINISTRATION
`At day 1, all randomised patients were given
`prednisolone at a starting dose of 1 mg/kg/day.
`They were requested to decrease this dose by
`5 mg per week to zero at the end of week 12.
`Where a patient weighed less than 60 kg, the
`starting dose was maintained for a longer
`period of time before decreasing to ensure that
`prednisolone was continued throughout phase
`I. Similarly, if the weight was greater than 60
`kg, the dose was reduced more rapidly over the
`first two weeks to ensure completion of
`prednisolone by the end of week 12.
`Also on day 1, patients were presented with
`tablets of identical appearance (scored '50 mg'
`on one side and 'Imuran' on the other). The
`dose was calculated at 2.5 mg/kg but each
`patient was asked to take only one tablet (50
`mg) per day lbr the first week as a preventative
`measure against idiosyncratic leucopenia in
`those randomised to azathioprine. If the leuco-
`
`This material was copied
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 4
`
`

`

`676
`
`TABLE 1 Baseline characteristics
`
`Baseline characteristic
`
`Male (%)
`Female (%)
`Age (y) (median and range)
`Weight (kg) (median and range)
`Duration of symptoms (y) (median and range)
`Time since diagnosis (y) (median and range)
`Extent (I:IC:C)
`Previous surgery (%)
`Episode in previous 6-12 months (%)
`Corticosteroids in previous 6-12 months (%)
`No previous corticosteroids (%)
`Smoking status (%)
`Severe disease (CDAI >300) (%)
`CDAI*
`ESR (min/h)*
`CRP (mg%)*
`Orosomucoid (g/1)*
`Leucocyte count (x 109/1)*
`
`Azathioprine (n-33)
`
`Placebo (n-30)
`
`7 (21)
`26 (79)
`33.9 (15-60)
`53.1 (46.7-62)
`3.7 (0.6-19.3)
`2.6 (0'1 19.0)
`8:20:5
`6 (18)
`28 (85)
`22 (67)
`5 (15)
`22 (67)
`17 (52)
`301 (264-358)
`.45 (20-59)
`5.4 (2.9-7.3)
`1.85 (1.27-2.52)
`9.0 (7.0-10.9)
`
`11 (37)
`19 (63)
`31.8 (21-62)
`57.5 (48-64)
`4.7 (0.2-19•4)
`3.7 (0.1-18.7)
`6:19:5
`8 (27)
`21 (70)
`19 (63)
`
`2 7) (
`20 (67)
`13 (43)
`282 (240-356)
`26 (15-42)
`3.9 (2.8-51)
`1.79 (1.47-2.52)
`10.0 (5.6-12.6)
`
`*Median and interquartile range. (cid:9)
`
`C-colonic disease.
`
`addition to a 12 week course of prednisolone.
`The treatment and placebo groups were
`similar with respect to the basic demographic
`data (Table I).
`
`EARLY DISCONTINUATION OF THERAPY
`At 12 weeks, 20 of 63 randomised patients
`(32%) had been withdrawn: nine of 33 (27%)
`in the azathioprine group and 11 of 30 (37%)
`in the placebo group.
`Overall, 47 (74.6%) of those randomised
`withdrew before the end of the trial: 28 of 30
`(93%) in the placebo group and 19 of 33
`(58%) in the azathioprine group. Table II gives
`the reasons for withdrawal.
`
`PRIMARY EFFICACY PARAMETERS
`
`Remission at 12 weeks
`There was no significant difference between
`the proportions of patients who had achieved
`and maintained remission at 12 weeks: 24 of
`33 (73%) in the azathioprine group v 19 of 30
`(63%) receiving placebo (p
`
`Remission at 15 months
`There was a highly significant difference
`between the proportions of patients who were
`still in remission at the end of the trial period: 14
`of 33 (42%) in the azathioprine group v two of
`30 (7%) receiving placebo, (1)=0.001).
``Relative risk' (relative protective effect of aza-
`thioprine v placebo was 6.36 (95% confidence
`intervals (CI) 1.6 to 25.7). This ratio remained
`clinically and statistically significant after adjust-
`ing for disease severity (RR-=6.84 (1.68 to
`
`TABLE 11 Reasons for withdrawal
`
`Reason
`
`No response phase I
`Default
`In remission
`Not in remission
`Clinical side effect
`Haematological side effect
`Patient request
`Clinical relapse (phase 2)
`Other, for example, pregnancy
`
`Treatment group
`
`Placebo (cid:9)
`(n-28) (cid:9)
`
`Azathioprine
`(n=19)
`
`9
`
`0
`2
`0
`
`13
`
`7
`
`2
`
`7
`
`This material was copi ed
`fibs hLLhd and may be
`
`Candy, Wright, Gerber, Adams, Gerig, Goodman
`
`24.93), time since diagnosis (RR=6.48 (1.68 to
`24.93)), and sex (RR= 6.9 (1.65 to 28.8)).
`The influence of a number of variables was
`further examined with logistic regression using
`a stepwise procedure, without changing the
`result. The analysis was repeated after exclud-
`ing defaulters and those withdrawn for reasons
`other than relapse; the result remained
`clinically and statistically highly significant.
`The question of effect modification by
`disease extent was considered by stratifying
`into three groups; ileitis (n-14), ileocolitis
`(n=39), and colitis (n=10). Table III gives
`a summary of this analysis. Although the
`category `ileocolitis' seems to predispose to a
`CI
`more favourable outcome (OR= 14.7 (95%
`2.2 to 96•5), the small numbers in the other
`groups and wide confidence intervals make
`analysis meaningless.
`
`Life table analysis
`Overall - the median number of days on the
`trial was 263 (range 4-540) with azathioprine v
`139 (range 7-446) with placebo (v-0.02)
`(Figure).
`Analysed by disease extent -
`number of days on the trial for those ram
`domised to azathioprine was 345 where disease
`was restricted to the ileum, 249 for those with
`ileocolitis, and 233 for those with colitis alone
`(p=0.57). Similarly, for those receiving
`placebo, the number of days on the trial were
`96, 147, and 141 respectively (p= 0'74).
`
`the median
`
`SECONDARY EFFICACY PARAMETERS
`
`At 12 weeks
`There were no significant differences from
`baseline between the two groups with respect
`0•06) or ()roo
`to
`=0•9), CRP (cid:9)
`CDA1 (cid:9)
`mucoid (p0•8). 'The median LSR increased
`,
`by 1.5 nun/hour among those receiving
`17,
`prednisolone alone while it dropped by
`,..
`nun/hour in thosepatients receiving azatilt°
` p
`1 (cid:9),). rine. This represents a highly significant 04)
`
`ference in favour of azathioprine 09 '4.0
`
`At 15 months
`Fable IV lists the median differences in
`for trial corn
`secondary efficacy parameters
`mencement to trial end.
`
`end
`TABLE III Proportion of patients in remission at trial
`by disease extent (cid:9)
`
`Responders (n•=16)
`
`Non-responders 01'47)
`
`14
`2
`
`4
`
`Total (n=63)
`Azathioprine
`Placebo
`Ileitis (n=14)
`Azathioprine
`Placebo
`Ileocolitis (n-39)
`Azathioprine
`Placebo
`Colitis (n-10)
`Azathioprine
`Placebo
`
`19
`18.
`
`it
`
`11
`
`1A)1( (cid:9)
`I l
`
`I./
`
`1 h
`
`SE (cid:9)
`SE
`
`I
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 5
`
`(cid:9)
`(cid:9)
`

`

`A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in the management of Crohn's disease
`
`677
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`0
`W..?, 40
`
`20
`
`N
`
`• Azathioprine
`+ Placebo
`
`in the general population; 70% v 30% for
`white women and 68% v 33% for women of
`mixed race. A less striking trend was found
`among male patients with prevalences of 57%
`v 41% for white, and 64% v 50% for men of
`mixed race.
`
`_ _L (cid:9)
`I (cid:9)
`I (cid:9)
`1 (cid:9)
`(cid:9)1 (cid:9) IIIII
`I
`I (cid:9)
`l (cid:9)
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
`Duration of trial (months)
`
`Life table representation.
`
`Leucocyte count
`The change in median white cell count was
`significantly different between the two groups.
`Median leucocyte count actually rose in the
`placebo group.
`In those patients randomised to azathioprine,
`the white cell count at the final visit was signifi-
`cantly lower in those who responded — that is,
`those in remission at trial end — than those who
`did not (p=0.005) (Table V). Nine of 13
`patients who developed leucopenia sufficient to
`warrant a decrease in drug dose v five of 20 who
`did not, were still in remission at the end of the
`trial (OR=6.75 (95% CI 1.15 to 42.7)).
`
`Acute phase reactants
`The reduction in median values for ESR and
`CRP were significantly different between the
`two groups. For technical reasons final visit
`orosomucoid concentrations were performed
`in only 45 patients. The median drop in this
`index of disease activity was 0.58 in the
`azathioprine group v 0.28 in those receiving
`placebo. This difference did not reach statisti-
`cal significance.
`
`CDAI
`As a result of the
`median differences
`cant between the
`groups (p=0.06).
`
`wide range in values, the
`in CDAI were not signifi-
`azathioprine and placebo
`
`Smoking
`To ascertain whether the rates of smoking were
`consistent with the published data for South
`Africa,3 the group was analysed by sex, popula-
`tion group, and smoking status. The preva-
`lence of smoking among female patients in this
`trial was approximately double that expected
`
`TABLF, iv
`subjects)
`
`Change from baseline to trial end (median, interquartile range, and number of
`
`Treatment gmttp
`
`Subject (n) AzoilOoprinc
`
`Subject (n) Placebo
`
`30 (cid:9)
`30 (cid:9)
`30 (cid:9)
`22 (cid:9)
`30 (cid:9)
`30 (cid:9)
`
`50 (-8-222)
`-6.5 (-17-9)
`0(-I0-17)
`0.28 (0.14-0.70)
`(-2.8-3.2)
`(-
`
`v0.06
`p=0.0005
`p=0.003
`p=0.15
`p=0.02
`p-0.9
`
`Cl)AI
`Rsik
`CRp
`()1,e rtiocmomucoid
`. ncYte
`"'eight
`
`32
`191.5 (15.5 256.5)
`32
`1551 II)
`31
`30 (0 5 3)
`21
`058 (0.18- 1.06)
`12
`2.8 (045 4.85)
`31
`( 10.2 0)
`negative value ,:hows an increase over vial period.
`
`A
`
`Discussion
`In this placebo controlled study of 63 patients
`with active Crohn's disease, azathioprine
`offered a clinically significant advantage over
`placebo in the maintenance of remission
`induced by a three month course of diminish-
`ing dose prednisolone. No significant adjunc-
`tive role could be shown for this drug when
`used with prednisolone in the induction of
`remission over a period of 12 weeks. A signifi-
`cantly greater decrease in the ESR was noted
`in those receiving combination therapy, how-
`ever.
`Previous controlled trials of immuno-
`suppression in Crohn's disease have shown
`conflicting results.4-11 Small numbers and dif-
`fering methodologies make comparison of
`these studies difficult, though Pearson, in a
`recent meta-analysis, has shown a significant
`role for azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in
`both active and maintenance therapy.12 In a
`comparatively large randomised withdrawal
`study, O'Donoghue and colleagues found
`azathioprine at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day to be
`effective in the maintenance of remission.8
`This early study has been criticised for having
`examined a subgroup of patients who had
`responded to the drug before withdrawal. The
`largest and perhaps most vigorous of these
`studies, the National Cooperative Crohn's
`Disease Study failed to show a significant role
`for azathioprine in either acute management
`(part 1) or as maintenance therapy (part 2).9
`Their negative findings may be explained by
`the fact that during both parts of this trial,
`azathioprine was used as single drug therapy
`and mostly at the low dose of 1 mg/kg.
`Interestingly, multivariate analysis of the
`maintenance trial, despite the overall negative
`findings, established that patients treated with
`corticosteroids before entry into the study,
`maintained remission for significantly longer
`than those who were not.
`The largest controlled trial to find a positive
`role for immunosuppression in Crohn's disease
`was that of Present et al, which was published
`shortly after the findings of the NCCDS in
`1980.10 In this two year double blind crossover
`study of 83 patients, the authors showed
`6-mercaptopurine (the active metabolite of
`azathioprine) to be significantly superior to
`placebo. At a mean starting dose of 1 mg/kg,
`patients receiving 6-mercaptopurine had a 67%
`overall improvement in symptoms compared
`with 8% receiving placebo. Their study showed
`convincing support for 6-mercaptopurine in
`the treatment of fistulas and as a corticosteroid
`sparing agent.
`Ewe and colleagues who have published
`data to support the use of a combination
`regimen of azathioprine at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg
`and prednisolone in active Crohn's disease,
`
`Ilimmumummimmounimmiimiimil
`
`rhismaterialwascopie-d
`
`Ex. 1070 - Page 6
`
`

`

`678
`
`Candy, Wright, Gerber, Adams, Gerig, Goodman
`
`TABLE v Median white cell count and interquartile range in subjects randomised to
`azathioprine. A comparison of those who completed the trial in remission (responders) with
`those who did not (non-responders)
`
`Subjects (n) (cid:9)
`
`Baseline
`
`Final visit (cid:9)
`
`Difference
`
`Responders
`Non-responders
`
`14
`18
`
`9.3 (7.0-13.0)
`8.5 (5-6-10.7)
`
`4.9 (3.9-5,7)
`6.8 (5.1-9.0)
`
`4.3 (2.0 (cid:9) 5.9)
`1•5 ( -0.9-3.0)*
`
`*p=0.005. The number of patients analysed was 32 not 33 as one was withdrawn on day 5
`without final visit data.
`
`concluded that patients went into remission
`more often and earlier and stayed in remission
`longer on the combined regimen.' I We were
`unable to show this adjunctive role in phase 1
`of our study. There are two possible explana-
`tions. Firstly, the protocol in Ewe's study
`allowed for the dose of prednisolone to be
`increased in the event of deterioration in symp-
`toms on two occasions. In our study a CDAI
`score of more than 150 in phase 1 resulted in
`immediate withdrawal. Secondly, their trial
`period was four months in total compared with
`the three months of our phase 1. Assuming
`that azathioprine may take up to four months
`to become effective,13 a possible subgroup of
`late responders would have been lost in our
`study. Examination of the life table graph
`shows divergence of the group's relapse rates at
`approximately four months. It is interesting to
`note, however, that the median ESR was
`significantly lower at 12 weeks in those
`randomised to azathioprine. Though not
`statistically significant, there was a similar
`trend for CRP.
`The rationale for not using azathioprine and
`6-mercaptopurine as first line therapy in
`Crohn's disease has been the potentially
`serious side effects. Clinical pancreatitis,
`reportedly the commonest short-term compli-
`cation (3-7%)I 4 was not encountered in our
`study, though routine amylase and lipase tests
`were not performed. A single patient devel-
`oped epigastric pain sufficient to warrant with-
`drawal from the study. Serum and urinary
`amylase values taken at the time of withdrawal
`were normal. The pain resolved spontaneously
`and at completion of trial analysis, the patient
`was found to have been randomised to
`placebo. Bone marrow suppression sufficient
`to warrant withdrawal from the study (see
`criteria in methods) was not encountered, but
`13 of 33 patients in the azathioprine group did
`require a decrease in their drug dose as a result
`of a fall in leucocyte count below 4 X109/1. (All
`counts increased after diminution of dose.)
`Leucopenia did not occur during the combina-
`tion prednisolone/azathioprine period and,
`where it did occur thereafter, there was no
`consistent time interval in which it developed.
`Despite small numbers, there was a highly
`significant negative correlation between leuco-
`cyte count and therapeutic outcome within
`the azathioprine group. Colonna
`et al in a
`retrospective study found a strong positive
`correlation between extent of drug induced
`leucopenia and clinical success of immuno-
`suppressive therapy,15 Our study confirms this
`finding.
`
`Under the influence of the beneficial find-
`ings of Korelitz et (4416 im munosuppression has
`
`Th is material was copied
`at the NLM and may be
`ht Laws
`
`been used extensively in fistulous disease. As
`radiological studies were not performed at
`entry and completion in this trial, success of
`therapy could not be ascertained for entero-
`enteral fistulas. In the two patients with recto-
`vaginal fistulas receiving active medication,
`drainage diminished entirely during the trial
`but this may reflect firming of the stool rather
`than fistulous healing. The only patient with
`extensive perianal Crohn's randomised . to
`
`
`azathioprinedrawnbet.( )re d1i2d wneoeticsr.espond and was with-
`
`The association between smoking and
`Crohn's disease has been established epidemi-
`-
`ologically." When analysed by sex and popula
`tion group, the prevalence of smoking in our
`overall sample was higher than in the general
`populational Multivariate analysis, however,
`prine. to show smoking status as an effect
`-
`azathio-
`modifier in determining response to azathio
`
`The results of this trial add weight to the
`-
`accumulating evidence tor the use of a combi
`nation of azathioprine and short-term corticos-
`teroids in active Crohn's disease. Further, our
`data suggest that azathioprine at a starting dose
`5 mg/kg/day is safe and effective in the
`of 2.
`longterm maintenance of remission induced by
`such a combination regimen.
`illienitri)rwaiiitial nitillepslitti.citeit:tailibalreltaslywsiesr.e kindly supplied bY .Well• °919s
`SA I,ty I Ad. We are grateful to Doctor Rodney Ehrlich for hi-
`
`1 Salomon I', Kornbluth A, Ai ,:•nberg J, janowitz HD. flow
`, (cid:9) 1,,"1",,l'', , I . 1( /i:ii t ri r,..iivi,il 1992; 14: 211 5.
`I''''Illi:11..1t,'1•,:-1.1:ii. oi l' i'rjW(;r,flKIlleln'sidlif.e'll)seev.ell\opliMicetna-1
`:::/.'x:;i::'.7:0;;;',';,,i;,-
`. (cid:9)
`Gitstrocnterub0
`;1 1 ,i , ,liii'. I )1,-t - Activity Index.
`•,1 (cid:9)
`litiiiii,yi r:,..yl?,:,S,,aloojee Y. Si,noking (in Soudthi,A912.ri;e10::
`1) wi:,iii:::::ilit:i.li.;;..1,1ii,111:.1,,..,r.,,,1111:,,,,,i,i .: ,11.,,;i;;..,,, i,1 11,:iiii,cti .: rek,eitileoij, .,i:)narwn son Am.
`
`I Y,2;,-11111,12.111),i.,(1,N1,111
`
`I../ (cid:9)
`
`:0,.1:;iiiii , ,t, I ), 1,,,.cl, 1), f
`
`.,::::::11111:',%(dIti5metarsocIleldatfricia411
`
`i(p)7iri ;o fi,,Ii•:
`i tr'hj''' . is,t111,cr'‘';'r: i nis:RI , S
`(..1 :i.,1/1,1',,)1,,,,,,),I,./i):,,/, ,,III,•,,,,/,),!,,,i!.18, ii;1,, if )ii i(,::(i.or:)15(iatiwi,.;is,,,,,,,r,t,nInts:e‘tici,:r(ted,ow:viiiwii,c).7iili...1a:t11.66unco:kp(,r)iiinloco:vin,...clui(11.:i, 6 (cid:9) Kl..'slin ''/ 111, i'l
`l):11,1::: I Ii j", M itchell
`
`
`8., (cid:9)
`
`
`I
`tsrleeZ /)\Ocr9117t5“;) 7'6:
`.'ncI lilji::11 ;:./iii iii)),I):).1-') i)i)_. li''); (IX:1;41)11111A1'sj:dKiseiri.s
`
`);aix:ralhtnri,:l d(i)sf ci::se-.,
`
`N LIII,:_i': :: :1; ii),,,i,.)(1,-,1 p:,
`ljj,f)out )Ict-rbelaitnnlewntitlfl(d
`maintenance
`
`. i Hest
`,,.,
`) met) RW, Switi IM4, Sessions j" I' Jr, 13ecktelj.Y ,
`National Cooperative Crdr.,,-
`9 (cid:9)
`II I
`. _ (cid:9) W1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket